STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
Criminal Justice
CMRJ698
Comprehensive Exam in Criminal Justice
8 Week Course
Table of Contents
Instructor Information
Evaluation Procedures
Course Description
Grading Scale
Course Scope
Course Outline
Course Objectives
Policies
Course Delivery Method
Academic Services
Course Materials
Selected Bibliography
Instructor Information
Table of Contents
Course Description (Catalog)
Comprehensive final examination for students in the Master of Arts in Criminal Justice
program. The "Comprehensive Final Exam" is tailored specifically to each program and
must be taken after students have completed 36 hours of study (i.e. during the semester
following the final course) and successfully completed before the award of a degree. The
course number for the exam will be the Area of Study or Major, followed by a 700
number (i.e. for Strategic Intelligence, the Comprehensive Exam course number is
IN700, for Management, the Comprehensive Exam course number is DM703).
Table of Contents
Course Scope
This is the comprehensive final exam administered at the conclusion of your courses in
the Criminal Justice program. The examination is six hours in duration, closed book, and
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
proctored. Examinations will consist of questions relevant to core and major courses as
well as electives. This examination may be taken in the final semester of coursework, or
the semester immediately following.
Table of Contents
Course Objectives
Upon completion of this course the student will be able to:

Demonstrate comprehension of various core and elective criminal justice courses
through the responses to examination questions based upon the degree program
objectives of the Master of Arts in Criminal Justice program.
Table of Contents
Course Delivery Method
This M.A. in Criminal Justice course delivered via distance learning will enable
students to complete academic work in a flexible manner, completely online.
Course materials and access to an online learning management system will be
made available to each student. Online assignments are due by the last day of
each week and include 2 weeks with Forums, five separate Assignments within
the Assignment Folder (one being the Week 3 Assignment; practice Question, and
the other four dealing with proctor requirements/notifications), and the
Comprehensive Exam itself, which is due no later than Sunday of Week 8.
Assigned faculty will support the students throughout this eight-week course.
Table of Contents
Course Materials
Required Text
None. Preparation for the comprehensive exam does not require any participation with
other students or a professor (beyond the forums in Week 1 and 2, and the Week 3
Assignment; Practice Exam Question). Beyond this, the professor is not expected to take
you through study drills. At this point, you should be sufficiently prepared to reflect
upon key common concepts and theories learned during your academic. It is
recommended that students review (as a minimum) all core programs. For example:
Ethics, Criminology, and Research classes, etc, as these core classes and topics are
heavily utilized for each student’s random comp questions. Again, it is the responsibility
for all students to review all past core courses in order to prepare for the examination, as
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
well as to submit the proctor information (as stated in the Assignments Folder; via 4
different assignments), and to ultimately take the exam in the final week of class.
Software Requirements


Microsoft Office (MS Word, MS Excel, MS PowerPoint)
Adobe Acrobat Reader (Click here for free download)
Table of Contents
Evaluation Procedures
Grade Instruments
DQs (Includes Participation)
Week 5 Midterm Examination
Week 6 Research Paper
Week 8 Final Examination
Total
Percent of Final
Grade
40
20
20
20
100
Table of Contents
8 – Week Course Outline
Please see the Student Handbook to reference the University’s grading scale.
Table of
Contents
Week
1
Assignment(s)/Requirements
- Review Syllabus
- Forum: Introduce
Yourself...(Mandatory; Week 1)
- Read Critical Thought article
under Week 1 Lessons Tab
- Forum: Week 1; Key Grading
Components
DUE END OF WEEK 1
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
Note: Proctor Assignments via the
Assignments Folder should be
submitted as completed (these are
described in further detail below
this table)
- Forum: Week 2; Critical Thought
2
Note: Proctor Assignments via the
Assignments Folder should be
submitted as completed (these are
described in further detail below
this table)
- Complete Week 3 Sample
Question (via the Assignments
Folder)
3
4-7
8
Note: Proctor Assignments via the
Assignments Folder should be
submitted as completed (these are
described in further detail below
this table)
Continue to prepare for Comp
Exam by as a minimum reviewing
past core courses :
•CMRJ500 - Criminal Justice Ethics
•CMRJ501 - Criminology
•CMRJ505 - Research Methods in
Criminal Justice and Security
•CMRJ512 - Police Administration
•LSTD502 - Criminal Law
•LSTD503 - Criminal Justice Process
Complete Comp Exam
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
As stated in the above table, prior to completing the Comprehensive Final Exam, several
procedures must be followed and confirmed so that when you sit to complete the exam
you will be able to access the exam. With that in mind, four ungraded assignments have
been set up in your course site so that you follow the proper procedures and convey this
to the professor assigned to grade your exam. For each assignment, submit the
information directly into the dialog box. Do not submit an attachment to any of these
assignments.
Assignment 1 – Proctor Identification Submission
After you have identified your proctor, submit this information to the professor by
accessing the Proctor Identification Submission assignment and entering the full name,
address, phone number and email address of this proctor. This should be completed no
later than the start of Week 3 of the course.
Assignment 2 – Online Proctor Form Acknowledgement
After you have completed and submitted your Online Proctor Form, you are to convey
this to your professor by accessing the Online Proctor Form Acknowledgement
assignment and indicate to the professor that you have successfully submitted this form.
This should be completed no later than the start of Week 3 of the course.
Assignment 3 – Proctor Acceptance Confirmation
After you have communicated with your proctor and the proctor indicated he/she
responded electronically to AMU that he/she has agreed to be your proctor, you are to
convey this to your professor by accessing the Proctor Acceptance Confirmation
assignment and indicate to the professor that your proctor has successfully communicated
to AMU that he/she will be your proctor. This should be completed no later than the start
of Week 5 of the course.
Assignment 4 – Proctor Letter Confirmation
After you have communicated with your proctor and the proctor indicated he/she has
received the proctor letter from AMU containing the user name and password necessary
to access your Comprehensive Final Exam, you are to convey this to your professor by
accessing the Proctor Letter Confirmation assignment and indicate to the professor that
your proctor has received the proctor letter from AMU containing the user name and
password to access your Comprehensive Final Exam. This should be completed during
Week 6 of the course.
Once these steps have been completed, you are now ready to sit with your proctor and
complete your Comprehensive Final Exam.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
You are required to complete the Comprehensive Final on/by the Sunday of Week 8 of
this term.
In order to access the Comprehensive Final, you must submit your proctor information.
You will go to https://www.apus.edu/proctor/select-proctor to enter information about
you and your proctor. A group of monitors within academics will monitor the process
and keep track of those of you who have not identified a proctor in a timely manner.
They will communicate with you that the proctor needs to be identified and confirmed
before the exam timeframe. Regular reports will also be provided to the faculty member,
so that he or she knows about any students who have not arranged proctors. The proctor
monitors are under the guidance of AMU, and questions may be referred to AMU. The
email for this is proctor@apus.edu.
You may indicate on the web form that they are unable to find a proctor. If this occurs, a
member of the proctor monitoring staff will contact you to discuss possible options. The
requirements for a proctor are minimal, and you should be able to find someone to fulfill
the role. If you indicate that there is no proctor available to the proctor monitor, the
monitor will pursue the waiver if needed, and provide you with the code to enter the
exam. Faculty members will not be expected to deal with the lack of a proctor in this
situation.
The following are the requirements for proctors:
Your proctor will have overall responsibility for the security of the test administration.
Your proctor must hold either a minimum of a Bachelor's degree OR one of the following
professional positions:
•
Administrator or faculty member of any accredited institution of higher education.
•
School teacher, counselor, librarian, or administrator.
•
Local or regional librarian.
•
Human Resources manager, a training manager, supervisor, or manager of higher
rank.
•
For military personnel: a DANTES test control officer, an educational services
officer, a base librarian, or an officer.
•
Member of the clergy.
Please Note: Family members are not eligible to proctor your exam. Family members
are defined as:
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
•
Spouse, and his or her parents;
•
Sons and daughters, and their spouses;
•
Parents, and their spouses;
•
Brothers and sisters, and their spouses;
•
Grandparents and grandchildren, and their spouses;
•
Domestic partner and his or her parents
This is the comprehensive final exam administered at the conclusion of your courses in
the Criminal Justice program. The examination is six hours in duration, closed book, and
proctored. Examinations will consist of questions relevant to core and major courses as
well as electives. This examination may be taken in the final semester of coursework, or
the semester immediately following.
You should plan on taking your exam in the final week of class.
The examination is proctored and must be written without notes, books, or other
references.
You will answer four questions randomly selected that are related to the program
objectives (objectives are identified further down in this syllabus). As such, your answers
should be well thought out and comprehensive and they should include general references
to books, articles, or other works that support your arguments. You need not quote source
material directly as if in a research paper, but you should clearly articulate the essential
points of the authors you incorporate into your answers. Your responses are expected to
be well organized and free from spelling and grammatical errors.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
CJ Comprehensive Exam responses will be scored on the following scale:
Grading
Rubric
SYNTHESIS
OF
KNOWLEDGE
(FOCUS/
Comp Exam)
[Graduate
Learning
Outcomes
Assessment
Objective #4]
FOUNDATION
OF
KNOWLEDGE
[Graduate
Learning
Outcomes
Assessment
Objective #3]
EXEMPLARY
LEVEL
4
Student exhibits
a defined and
clear
understanding of
the assignment.
Response is
clearly defined
and well
constructed to
help guide the
reader
throughout the
assignment.
Student builds
upon the
response to the
exam question
with wellarticulated
reasoning,
figures, and/or
statements.
ACCOMPLISHED
LEVEL
3
Establishes a good
comprehension of
topic and in the
building of the comp
exam question
response. Student
demonstrates an
effective
presentation of their
response to the
thesis, with most
support statements
helping to support
the key focus of
assignment.
Student
demonstrates
proficient
command of the
subject matter in
their response to
the exam
question.
Response shows
an impressive
level of depth of
student’s ability
to relate course
content to
practical
examples and
applications.
Student provides
comprehensive
analysis of
details, facts, and
concepts in a
logical sequence.
Student exhibits
above average
usage of subject
matter in the
response. Student
provides above
average ability in
relating past course
content in examples
given. Details and
facts presented
provide an
adequate
presentation of
student’s current
level of subject
matter knowledge.
DEVELOPING
LEVEL
2
Student exhibits
a basic
understanding of
the intended
question, but the
response lacks
details. While
the response
answers some
portions of the
question, the
reader may have
some difficulty in
seeing linkages
between
thoughts. While
student has
included a few
facts and
statements, this
has limited the
quality of the
exam question
response.
The assignment
reveals that the
student has a
general,
fundamental
understanding of
the course
material.
Whereas, there
are areas of
some concerning
in the linkages
provided
between
reported facts
and reasoning.
Student
generally
explains
concepts, but
only meets the
minimum
requirements in
this area.
BEGINNNIG
LEVEL
1
Exhibits a
limited
understanding
of the question.
Reader is
unable to follow
the logic used
for the response
and
development of
key themes.
Student’s writing
is weak and
there is a
general lack of
supporting facts,
reasoning, and
or statements.
Student tries to
explain some
concepts, but
overlooks critical
details which
should be
included in the
question
response.
Response
appears vague
or incomplete.
Student
presents
concepts in
isolation, and
does not
perceive to have
a logical
sequencing of
ideas as it
regards clearly
addressing the
question being
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
asked.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
APPLICATION
OF
KNOWLEDGE
(CRITICAL
THINKING
SKILLS)
[Graduate
Learning
Outcomes
Assessment
Objective #5]
Student
demonstrates a
higher-level of
critical thinking
necessary for
graduate level
work. Learner
provides a
strategic approach
in presenting
examples of
problem solving or
critical thinking,
while drawing
logical
conclusions which
are not
immediately
obvious. Student
provides wellsupported (but not
necessarily
referenced, as
again this is a
closed book
exam) ideas and
reflection with a
variety of current
and/or world
views in the
assignment.
Student presents
a genuine
intellectual
development of
ideas throughout
assignment.
Student exhibits
a good command
of critical thinking
skills in the
presentation of
material and
supporting
statements.
Response
demonstrates the
student’s above
average use of
relating concepts
by using a variety
of factors.
Overall, student
provides
adequate
conclusions, with
2 or fewer errors.
Student takes a
common,
conventional
approach in
guiding the
reader through
various linkages
and connections
presented in the
response.
However,
student presents
a limited
perspective on
key concepts
throughout the
response.
Student appears
to have
problems
applying
information in a
problem-solving
manner.
Student
demonstrates
beginning
understanding of
key concepts, but
overlooks critical
details. Learner
is unable to apply
information in a
problem-solving
fashion. Student
presents
confusing
statements and
facts in their
response. No
evidence or little
semblance of
critical thinking
skills.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
ORGANIZATION
OF
IDEAS/FORMAT
Student
thoroughly
understands and
excels in
explaining all
major points. An
original, unique,
and/or
imaginative
approach to
overall ideas,
concepts, and
findings is
presented.
Overall format of
assignment
includes an
appropriate
introduction,
body, and
conclusion (using
headings in
accordance with
th
APA 6 edition).
Finished
response
demonstrates
student’s ability to
respond to the
exam question in
a logical
sequence.
Student explains
the majority of
points and
concepts in the
response.
Learner
demonstrates a
good skill level in
formatting and
organizing
thoughts in the
response.
Student presents
an above
average level of
preparedness,
with few
formatting errors.
Learner applies
some points and
concepts
incorrectly.
Student uses a
variety of
formatting styles,
with some
inconsistencies
throughout the
question
response.
Response does
not have a
continuous
pattern of logical
sequencing.
Response
reveals
formatting
errors and a
lack of
organization.
Student
presents an
incomplete
attempt to
provide
linkages or
explanation of
key terms as it
regards
responding to
the exam
question being
asked.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
WRITING
SKILL
[Graduate
Learning
Outcomes
Assessment
Objective
#2]
Student
demonstrates an
excellent
command of
grammar, as well
as presents a
response which
represents a clear
and concise writing
style. Presents a
thorough,
extensive
understanding of
word usage.
Response is errorfree and reflects
student’s ability to
prepare graduatelevel writing for
possible
publication in a
peer-reviewed
(refereed) journal.
Student provides
an effective
display of good
writing and
grammar.
Response reflects
student’s ability to
select appropriate
word usage and
presents an
above-average
presentation of a
given topic or
issue. Response
appears to be well
written with no
more than 3-5
errors. Student
provides a good
final product that
covers the aboveminimal
requirements.
Exam question
response reflects
basic writing and
grammar, but with
more than 5 errors.
Key terms and
concepts are
somewhat vague
and not completely
explained by
student. Student
uses a basic
vocabulary in
assignment.
Student’s writing
ability is average,
but demonstrates a
basic
understanding of
the subject matter
(i.e., question
being asked)
Topics, concepts,
and ideas are not
coherently
discussed or
expressed in the
response.
Student’s writing
style is weak and
needs
improvement,
along with
numerous
proofreading
errors. Response
lacks clarity,
consistency, and
correctness. In
order to meet
minimum writing
expectations the
student would
need to review
and revise the
response.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
Evaluation criteria
The distribution of grades for each of the four questions you answer will be of the
following categories:
1. “Pass with Distinction.” This grade is assigned for essays that are clearly demonstrate
an understanding of the issue beyond what is typically expected of the graduate student.
2. “Pass.” This grade is assigned for essays that meet the requirements for a graduatelevel essay.
3. “Fail.” This grade is assigned for essays that clearly do not meet the requirements for a
graduate-level essay.
The final grade for the exam will be compiled among the four questions (randomly
selected, and unknown to a student until they take the exam):
“Pass with Distinction.” If a student passes three of the four questions “with distinction,”
and at least passes the fourth question, he or she will pass the exam “with distinction.” A
student will graduate “with honors” if a grade of “passed with distinction” and a
minimum grade point average of 3.75 is earned.
“Pass.” If a student at least passes three of the four questions, he or she will pass the
exam.
“Fail.” If a student fails two or more questions, he or she will fail the exam. Such a
student will be offered a second examination containing new questions with a different
faculty member. If a student fails the exam twice, he or she will not be permitted a third
attempt and will not graduate. A different combination of the six study questions will be
used for a second examination. The student has the right to appeal issues related to the
comprehensive examination in line with the standard APUS appeals process.
The final grade will be entered at the end of the semester. Your grade will not be
entered in the system until that time in order to comply with AMU’s policy in this
area.
Table of Contents
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
Grading Scale
Please see the student handbook to reference the University’s grading scale.
Table of Contents
Course Online
Your exam must be completed prior to the end of the semester. It is due on/by the last
scheduled day of the semester on/by 11:55pm eastern time.
Comprehensive examination questions are based on the following program
objectives:
 Distinguish between the major systems of Criminal Justice and how the functions
of police, prosecution, courts, and corrections interface.

Analyze the various biological and psychological theories and philosophies of
criminal behavior as they influence modern developments in punishment,
sentencing, and corrections.

Evaluate the various definitions, objectives, and issues of new or emergent
criminal threats, such as terrorism, and how they compare and contrast with
traditional criminal behavior theories.

Assess the rule of law and changes to it as it pertains to direct and indirect
influence and impact on social reactions to crime, corrections, and victims of
crime.

Critically examine landmark criminal justice cases, from the Supreme Court down
to local levels, and determine their cultural, social, and economic impact.

Apply the concepts of professional and ethical behavior within the criminal
justice system.
Table of Contents
Polices
Please see the student handbook to reference all University policies. Quick links to
frequently asked about policies are listed below.
Drop/Withdrawal Policy
Plagiarism Policy
STUDENT WARNING: This course syllabus is from a previous semester archive and serves only as a
preparatory reference. Please use this syllabus as a reference only until the professor opens the classroom and
you have access to the updated course syllabus. Please do NOT purchase any books or start any work based on
this syllabus; this syllabus may NOT be the one that your individual instructor uses for a course that has not yet
started. If you need to verify course textbooks, please refer to the online course description through your student
portal. This syllabus is proprietary material of APUS.
Extension Process and Policy
Table of Contents
Selected Bibliography
Johnson, W., Rettig, R., Scott, G. & Garrison, S. (2004). The criminal justice student
writer’s manual (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Knowles, M., Swanson, R., Holton, E. & Holton, E. (2005). The adult learner: The
definitive classic in adult education and human resource development.
Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science & Technology Books.
Prins, H. (1999). Will they do it again?: Risk assessment and management in criminal
justice and psychiatry. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). (2010).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tannen, D. (2001). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New
York: Quill.
Table of Contents