University of Arizona School of Geography and Development TRAD 104 – The Geographies of US Diversity Instructor: Dereka Rushbrook Office: 453A Harvill Office Hours: 9-11 M, W, F E-mail: dereka@email.arizona.edu Course Website: d2l.arizona.edu Class Information (Day, Time, Location): Course Description Understanding the mosaic of diversity in the US is foundational to citizenship – to being an educated member of our society able to contribute to key local, regional, and national debates regarding everything from immigration to affirmative action. Moreover, without an understanding of the role that space and place have in shaping the contexts of diversity, we will be unable to answer some key questions that confront us as a society, including: – – – – – Does the election of President Barack Obama mean we are entering a race-less or post-racial society? Why hasn’t cultural and economic globalization signaled the end of cultural, racial, and ethnic divides? How do differences in class, race, and gender get put into place locally, and how do these aspects of diversity intersect with patterns of aging, disability/health, and sexuality? What will be the role of nationalism in defining your sense of place in the world, and your patterns of travel and migration? How do the spaces of our everyday lives – in homes, workplaces, and recreational sites – affect our ‘performance’ as socially marked individuals? These questions are profoundly important to human geographers. Their answers are complex, sometimes subjective, and especially critical for the implications they have for the way that we, as members of a society, interact with one another and the rest of the world. This course seeks to provide students with theoretical and practical tools for understanding questions of identity and difference in this intensely interconnected world. Students are asked to think critically about their own perspective and to understand how various factors, historically and geographically, have shaped and continue to shape their understanding and experience of diversity in the United States. Throughout the semester we explore the ways in which specific regions and places influence and are shaped by various forms of diversity. Required Materials Susser, Ida and Thomas C. Patterson, eds. 2001. Cultural Diversity in the United States: A Critical Reader. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 0631222138. *Required. Referred to as CDUSA. Shinagawa, Hajime and Jang, Michael, 1998. Atlas of American Diversity. Rowman Altamira. ISBN: 9780761991281. *Required. Referred to as Atlas. One composition book to be used as a field journal. One package of 5” x 7” notecards. TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook You will need to bring the required readings and your package of notecards to every class. Course Objectives Students taking this course should leave with: An solid understanding of the historical-geographic forces (voluntary and forced migration, genocide, regional economic transformations) that led to the varied patchwork of US diversity that we have today. A strong knowledge of the map of that diversity, and an ability to understand how its variation influences contemporary debates in the social, economic, political, and environmental spheres. An solid understanding of how social diversity and space intersect to provide the template through which all people experience others on a daily basis, from the home to the workplace and beyond. A strong knowledge of theoretical lenses used by geographers and other social scientists in accounting for and analyzing social diversity across places. D2L Class materials, course announcements and grades will be posted to the course D2L website. Students are responsible for checking D2L regularly. Course Schedule Week 1 8/24 Introduction & Plagiarism Assignment 8/26 Movie Reading: “Introduction” (Atlas) pgs. 17-22 Week 2 Topic: What do we mean when we say landscape? Identity? Social construction? Discourse? Hybridity? Dualisms? Reading: “Cultural Diversity in the United States” (CDUSA); Del Casino Jr., “Social Geography? What’s That?” pg. 11-21; “Asian Pacific Americans” (Atlas), pgs. 45-56 Week 3 Labor Day – No Class Topic: What is diversity? How are nationalism and diversity mutually constitutive? Reading: “Diversity in Anthropological Theory” (CDUSA); Del Casino Jr., “Social Geography? What’s That?” pgs. 21-28; Mitchell, “Geographies of Belonging: Nations, Nationalism, and Identity in an Era of Deterritorialization,” pgs. 259-282 Week 4 Topic: How has gender been constructed in American society? What makes gender different from sexuality? Reading: Sharp, “Feminisms”; Swedland and Urla, “The Anthropometry of Barbie: Unsettling Ideals of the Feminine Body in Popular Culture,” pgs.277-313 Week 5 Topic: Are spaces in our society gendered? How? Reading: Mitchell, “Feminism and Cultural Change: Geographies of Gender,” pgs. 199-228 Exercise: Gender representations in television & film Week 6 – Exam 1 Topic: How has race been historically constructed in American society? TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Reading: Kobayashi, “Critical ‘Race’ Approaches to Cultural Geography,” pgs. 238-247; Mitchell, “A Place for Everyone: Cultural Geographies of Race,” pgs. 230-241 Week 7 – Group Project Meetings Topic: What does it mean to say that there are racial spaces? How have spaces been racialized? Reading: “The Color-Blind Bind” (CDUSA); Mitchell “A Place for Everyone,” pgs. 241-258; “African Americans” (Atlas), pgs. 23-34 Week 8 – Group Project Meetings Topic: How is ethnicity tied to nationalism? How are ethnicity and nationalism represented in the spaces around us? Reading: Agnew, “Nationalism,” pgs. 223-237; “Ethnic Enclaves and Cultural Diversity” (CDUSA); “Native Americans” (Atlas), pgs. 97-103 Week 9 Topic: Why should we study health in a class about diversity? Reading: “Diversity in the Context of Health and Illness” (CDUSA); “Non-Hispanic Whites: European Americans” (Atlas), pgs. 111-116 Week 10 Topic: What are the geographies of health and healthcare? How are health facilities and health care access spatially distributed? Reading: Del Casino Jr., “Social Geography and the Geographies of Health,” pgs. 99-124; “A Comparison of American Race and Ethnic Social and Economic Status” (Atlas), pgs. 135-155 Week 11 – Exam 2 Topic: How are young peoples’ relationships with space different from adults? Reading: Gagen, “Landscapes of Childhood and Youth,” pgs. 404-415; Del Casino Jr., “On the Geographies of Children and Young People,” pgs. 185-210 Week 12 – Field Journal Due Topic: Is there a geography to aging? How is age represented in the landscape? Reading: Del Casino Jr., “Social Geography and the Geographies of Health,” pgs. 249-263; Nazareth, “The Leisure Economy,” pgs. 61-73 Week 13 Topic: What is sexuality and how does it differ from gender? Reading: Phillips, “Sexuality,” pgs. 265-276; Mitchell, “Sex and Sexuality: The Cultural Politics and Political Geography of Liberation,” pgs. 171-184 Week 14 Topic: How is sexual identity lived in and through the landscape? Reading: Maskovsky, “Sexual Minorities and the New Urban Poverty” (CDUSA); Mitchell, “Sex and Sexuality: The Cultural Politics and Political Geography of Liberation,” pgs. 184-198 Week 15 – Exam 3 Topic: Case study: reading the legal system through diversity. Reading: Merry, “Racialized Identities and the Law” (CDUSA) Week 16 – Projects due; Presentations Topic: Course Wrap-Up. Final Exam: the final exam will be held according to the university final exam calendar TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Evaluation In-Class Exams (Two highest exam grades @ 15%) – 30% In Class Writing Assignments & Quizzes – 20% Group Project (10% group grade + 15% individual grade, based on journal and paper) – 25% Final Exam – 25% Total 100% The normal University of Arizona grading scheme applies: 90-100(A), 80-89(B), 70-79(C), 60-69(D), and below 60(E). Attendance Attendance will not be formally taken for each class meeting, but will be measured with in-class writing assignments and/or quizzes. Students who miss class will be unable to make up these exercises. Note: students are allowed to drop two assignments or quizzes without penalty. The effectiveness of this course is largely dependent on the full participation of all class members. Therefore, attending class is not enough—active participation with the instructor and your colleagues is essential for ensuring an optimal learning environment. Assignments Reading assignments for this course are listed on the tentative outline of the lecture topics. Any additional readings will be communicated to you and will be available on the D2L class website. Although the lecture material is important relative to the topics we cover, class discussion of assigned readings is an equally important factor in this course. Therefore, it is imperative that you keep up with class readings. Reading quizzes may be implemented to ensure the class is keeping up with reading assignments. It is the student’s responsibility to turn the assignments in on time. Assignments are not accepted via e-mail. Exams Three in-class exams and a final exam will be given. The lowest score of the in-class exams will be dropped. The final exam is cumulative. All exams will consist of multiple choice, short answer, and essay questions. The exams will cover all materials from lecture, class readings and videos. There will be no make-up exams unless a Dean’s excuse is provided. Group Project The goal of this project is to demonstrate your ability to apply concepts you learned in the class to your own personal experiences and to engage critically with the city in which you live. Groups for this assignment will be determined during class. As a group, you will select one element of Tucson’s built environment (for example, parks, grocery stores, playgrounds, schools) from the provided list. You will then engage in a case study of that element, noting context, diversity of uses and users, and, when appropriate to the topic, spatial distributions and/or disparities in different areas. As a group, you will explore your subject through personal visits, Internet research and library materials. When doing so, note the presence or lack of that element along with its quality, quantity, size, and other relevant factors and how those differ or are similar in different parts of the city. You will link that element to at least one of the social characteristics (such as income, race, age, etc.) discussed in class and in the readings. Based on this experience, the group will design a photo essay. The photo essay will be given a group grade. TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Each student will also complete a 2-page, double-spaced paper individually. This is not a research paper but rather a reflection on your personal experience with this project. Students will receive an individual grade on this paper. Additional details on this project will be distributed in class. These papers will be uploaded to turnitin.com. Group Meetings: Groups will be required to set up a meeting with the professor mid-way through the semester to discuss their projects. Groups must explain how they have organized the project, including: their accomplishments to date, their plan for presenting the information at the group project final, the content of the material that will be included, and how tasks have been divided among group members. Field Journal: Each student will compile a journal, which shall include at least bi-weekly entries (marked by date, time, and location). The journal must include, but is not limited to, field and research notes, student’s weekly contributions to the overall project, and reflections on the group project’s content. These reflection notes are intended to engage the student in thinking reflexively about the project and what he or she is observing and thinking about the socio-spatial environment of Tucson. This is not an opportunity for students to comment on the nature of the course assignments themselves, rather it is to keep a log of fieldwork. This is also a chance to think critically about assignments, issues raised in class, and reactions to situations occurring in student’s everyday lives. The journal-in-progress will be due at the group project meeting and again in Week 12. Each time it will be returned to students. The completed journal will be turned in with the final project. In-Class Writing and Quizzes Students are required to purchase a package of 5x7 index cards. Students will use these in class to speculate on future topics and to reflect on how their thinking has changed after they have studied each topic, and for short quizzes and writing assignments. Attendance will not be taken. Instead these cards will be collected regularly and used in lieu of attendance as part of the final participation grade. There will be no make-ups of in-class quizzes or writing assignments. Instead, the two lowest scores will be automatically dropped. Late Work Given the nature of the group project, no late photo essays will be accepted. Students who fail to turn in their reflection paper on time will be subject to a 10% deduction per day from the assignment’s grade. *Academic Success* For most students, this course presents challenges in terms of reading requirements, exams, the group assignment, and high expectations for critical thinking. In order to succeed academically, students need to attend class regularly, take comprehensive notes, come to class prepared and prepare to think critically about a wide array of issues. Students who do not follow this advice will most likely be disappointed with their performance. If you are experiencing personal issues that may be affecting your performance in the class or if you are having difficulty understanding course material, please contact the instructors as soon as possible so we can work with you to remedy the situation. *Key—If you are experiencing problems (personal or class related) and it is affecting your class performance, make contact sooner rather than later. TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Academic Integrity Plagiarism information and examples of citations can be found at the University of Arizona Library homepage: http://www.library.arizona.edu/help/tutorials/plagiarism/index.html One of the introductory assignments for this class is a plagiarism exercise that explains and reinforces the importance of academic honesty and avoidance of plagiarism. Students who do not turn the Plagiarism assignment within 1 (one) week of the introduction of the assignment will be administratively dropped from the class. All university rules regarding academic integrity and honesty apply in this course. Course materials that are handed in are expected to be original and your own work. The University of Arizona’s Code of Academic Integrity and the Student Code of Conduct can be found at: http://dos.web.arizona.edu/uapolicies/ No threatening behavior will be tolerated in this class and the following University of Arizona policies will be enforced to deal with such behavior: http://policy.web.arizona.edu/~policy/threatening.pdf Writing Assistance The Writing Center is a free resource for UA Undergraduate and Graduate students as well as faculty and staff. At the Writing Center, a trained peer consultant will work individually with you on anything that you are writing (in or out of class), at any point in the writing process from brainstorming to editing. Appointments are recommended, but are not required. For more information or to make an appointment, visit their website at http://english.web.arizona.edu/index_site.php?id=287 or stop by the Bear Down Gym 102. The Writing Center can also be reached at (520) 621-3182. Students with Disabilities If you anticipate the need for accommodations in taking this course, you need to register with the Disability Resource Center (DRC) and request that the DRC send me a notification of your registration and a summary of your specific need so we may accommodate you in whatever manner necessary. If you have any questions regarding any aspects of this policy or concerns, please contact your instructor. Classroom Policies Please respect other students’ opinions and critiques. The best way to understand and further strengthen your position is to critically analyze and interpret divergent opinions. There is no tolerance for insensitive or discriminatory comments with respect to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity. Students who violate this policy will be asked to immediately leave the class. At times, information in class or what you witness in the field may seem offensive. No matter how disturbing or offensive, the bottom line is critical thinkers should be able to think about and discuss all sorts of events, actions, and behaviors. In addition, inherent to critical thinking is the ability to evaluate facts and opinions effectively. Please be on time to class. Coming late is not only a disruption to the instructor, but it is inconsiderate to your fellow classmates. Please turn off cell phones. Additionally, there is no tolerance of students sending text messages or browsing the internet during class. All such activity should be taken outside the classroom. Students who violate this policy are first given a verbal warning and subsequent violations will result in the student leaving the classroom for that day. TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Treat e-mail with the instructor as a formal means of communication. This means that you should compose your e-mail in a professional manner and avoid constant bombardment of e-mails to the professor. Please be aware that it may be up to 48 hours before you receive a response. Content Policy Information in the syllabus regarding scheduling and course assignments is subject to change with reasonable advanced notice, as deemed appropriate by the instructor(s). Bibliography Agnew, John. 2004. “Nationalism”. In A Companion to Cultural Geography. Eds. James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard C. Schein. Blackwell Publishing. 223-237. Del Casino Jr., Vincent. 2009. “Social Geography? What’s That?” In Social Geography: A Critical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. Del Casino Jr., Vincent. 2009. “Social Geography and the Geographies of Health”. In Social Geography: A Critical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. 99-124 Del Casino Jr., Vincent. 2009. “On the Geographies of Children and Young People”. In Social Geography: A Critical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. 185-210. Gagen, Elizabeth A. 2004. “Landscapes of Childhood and Youth”. In A Companion to Cultural Geography. Eds. James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard C. Schein. Blackwell Publishing. 404-419. Kobayshi, Audrey. 2004. “Critical ‘Race’ Approaches to Cultural Geography”. In A Companion to Cultural Geography. Eds. James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard C. Schein. Blackwell Publishing. 238-247. Mitchell, Don. 2000. “A Place for Everyone: Cultural Geographies of Race”. In Cultural Geography: A Critical Geography. Blackwell. 230-258. Mitchell, Don. 2000. “Feminism and Cultural Change: Geographies of Gender”. In Cultural Geography: A Critical Geography. Blackwell. 199-228. Mitchell, Don. 2000. “Geographies of Belonging: Nations, Nationalism, and Identity in an Era of Deterritorialization”. In Cultural Geography: A Critical Geography. Blackwell. 259-282. Nazareth, Linda. 2007. “Time Off for Good Behavior”. In The Leisure Economy. Wiley & Sons. 61-73. Phillips, Richard. 2004. “Sexuality”. In A Companion to Cultural Geography. Eds. James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard C. Schein. Blackwell Publishing. 265-278. Sharp, Joanne. 2004. “Feminisms”. In A Companion to Cultural Geography. Eds. James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, and Richard C. Schein. Blackwell Publishing. Susser, Ida and Thomas C. Patterson, eds. 2001. Cultural Diversity in the United States: A Critical Reader. Wiley-Blackwell. TRAD 101 Fall 2009 Rushbrook Urla, Jacqueline and Alan C. Swedlund. 2000. “The Anthropometry of Barbie: Unsettling Ideals of the Feminine Body in Popular Culture”. Popular Culture.