<Picture><Picture: Get Your Levied Earnings Back PLUS Damages!>
<Picture>
<Picture>
"Notice of Levy on Wages, Salary, and Other Income"
<Picture>
<Picture>
<Picture>You wouldn't be here reviewing this information unless you have either been
unlawfully garnished, are currently being unlawfully garnished, or are under the
collective threat by the IRS and your employer of imminent garnishment of your property
earnings. You might also be a representative of the IRS, or of the majority of major
corporations in this nation which are acting in unlawful compliance with the IRS, who
wishes to "spy" out the "opposition" or, if a corporation, assess your jeopardy for having
violated the rights of your employees. Either way, welcome to this web page. The laws of
the Several States, and the State & Federal Constitutions, clearly and convincingly
establish the facts that are presented herein; as the IRS like to say - "Substance over
supposition" reveals the true nature of the facts regarding illegal levy and garnishment.
Let's see what the Supreme Court has consistently said about such pre-judgment
garnishments??!!
"The result is that a prejudgment garnishment of the Wisconsin type may as a practical
matter drive a wage-earning [395 U.S. 337, 342] family to the wall. Where the taking of
one's property is so obvious, it needs no extended argument to conclude that absent notice
and a prior hearing (cf. Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237 U.S. 413, 423 ) this
prejudgment garnishment procedure violates the fundamental principles of due process."
Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337 (1969)
"Thus construed, and as applied in this case, we think [ 237 U.S. 413,423 ] 2677 is
repugnant to the 'due process of law' provision of the 14th Amendment, which requires at
least a hearing, or an opportunity to be heard, in order to warrant the taking of one's
property to satisfy his alleged debt or obligation;.." Coe v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 237
U.S. 413 (1915)
"Without pre-attachment notice and a hearing, the risk of erroneous deprivation that the
State permits here is too great to satisfy due process under any of the of the
interpretations of the statutory "probably cause" requirement offered by the parties"
"Historical and contemporary practice support our analysis. Prejudgment attachment is a
remedy unknown at common law." Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991)
YOUR EMPLOYER + IRS "NOTICE OF LEVY" = UNLAWFUL PREJUDGMENT
GARNISHMENT!
Federal and Tennessee [also your State!] laws prohibit garnishment of earnings as a prejudgment remedy to satisfy a claim for a tax debt. The Supreme Court has repeatedly
upheld the constitutional principle that pre-judgment garnishment of wages is not
permitted until a judgment is obtained. In order that the claimed debtor or wage earner
will have the opportunity to be heard and tender any defense he may have, it was held
that wage garnishment prior to a trial on a suit for judgment constituted taking property
without procedural due process of law, which is required by the Fourteenth Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution for the united States of America [Sniadach v. Family Finance
Corp., 395 U.S. 337 (1969)], as embodied in the laws and the constitution of the State of
Tennessee [and your State, too!].
YOU CAN SUE YOUR EMPLOYER IN STATE COURT TO RECOVER YOUR
UNLAWFULLY GARNISHED EARNINGS PLUS DAMAGES FOR YOUR
INJURIES!
Click Here to Review Law Basis
JOIN with me now and file your own civil action under your own State's laws and
constitution!
<Picture>
<Picture>The material presented on this page is intended to help you and your family to
begin the road back to financial wellness after having been unlawfully and
unconstitutionally placed into involuntary servitude and a state of enforced peonage by
the illegal acts of your employer; who has voluntarily complied with an IRS "Notice of
Levy". You must understand that I am acting only to share the results of my law research,
the information & responses developed in my ongoing civil action against my previous
employer, and to share the collective information, filings and results of similar legal
process by others who are in contact with me; NOTHING HEREIN CONTAINED, NOR
IN ANY COMMUNICATION I MAY SHARE WITH YOU, IS INTENDED, NOR
SHOULD IT BE CONSTRUED AS, LEGAL ADVICE!! You are entirely responsible for
reviewing any information that sources from this web page, or myself in the process of
communicating with you, and making your own decisions regarding whatever actions
you may wish to take.
<Picture: The Conservative Ring>
next site || skip 1 site || skip 5 sites || previous site || skip one site previous || JOIN!
<Picture>
<Picture>
<Picture>
Last Modified: Friday, May 8, 1998 at 09:00 PM
<Picture>