S_300_349 - StealthSkater

advertisement
Table of Contents - "S_350_399.doc"__
S-354. from Andrew Potter regarding room-temperature semiconductors
S-355. from Andrew Potter regarding on-board power supplies (for UNITEL)
S-356. from Thomas Skeggs regarding SkyBooks' Montauk series
S-357. from Iona Miller regarding her essays on Consciousness
S-358. from Thomas Skeggs regarding current status on his projects
S-359. from Thomas Skeggs regarding "stargate" rumors
S-360. Larry Maurer discusses concepts with "B.G." & Ed Halerewicz, Jr.
S-361. from Tom Skeggs regarding "defenses" against remote-viewing
S-362. from Jonathon Bluestone regarding dimensional portals
S-363. from Jonathon Bluestone regarding "breaking news" at Tinker AFB
S-364. from Bob King regarding "stargates" and past civilizations
S-365. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing "anomalies"
S-366. from Thomas Skeggs regarding UFO-technology dependent on consciousness?
S-367. from Michael D'Agostino regarding rotating induction fields
S-368. from Michael D'Agostino regarding alternative technologies
S-369. from Michael D'Agostino Technological Progress through Unconventional Thinking
S-370. from Michael D'Agostino - misc. comments following receipt of backup-CD
S-371. from Thomas Skeggs regarding FTA progress
S-372. from Andrew Potter regarding Transdimensions, Inc. of Huntsville, Alabama
S-373. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Corso's book
S-374. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding alleged ET-government back-engineering
S-375. from Thomas Skeggs regarding similar concepts to his 'Star Chamber'
S-376. from Michael D'Agostino regarding ELFRAD signals at Phi Hertz
S-377. from Michael D'Agostino regarding physics theories
S-378. from Thomas Skeggs regarding superluminal electromagnetic fields
S-379. from Tom Skeggs regarding his mysterious childhood phone-call
S-380. from Tom Skeggs regarding updating his papers on Biological and Magnetic Teleportation
S-381. from Tom Skeggs regarding "stealing" ideas from others
S-382. from Robert Neil Boyd forwarding Holographic Cloning & Information Transfer
S-383. from Tim Ventura regarding limitations of science and observation
S-384. from Bill Hamilton regarding Bob Lazar and MJ-12
S-385. from Bill Hamilton regarding Bob Lazar and Dan Burisch
S-386. from Tim Ventura regarding anti-gravity research
S-387. from Bill Hamilton regarding above-top-secret research
S-388. from Bill Hamilton regarding above-top-secret research
S-389. from Tom Skeggs regarding recent FTA progress
S-390. from Michael D'Agostino regarding Bob Beckwith
S-391. from Simon Raschle regarding challenging the status quo
S-392. from Michael D'Agostino regarding "Multiplexed Time"
S-393. from Tom Skeggs regarding virtual e-p pairs producing propulsion
S-394. from Michael D'Agostino regarding more reflections on Bob Beckwith
S-395. from Michael D'Agostino regarding 'rods'
S-396. from Bob King regarding a 'rods' video
S-397. from Bob King regarding copying a 'rods' VHS tape
S-398. from Michael D'Agostino regarding a 'rods' video
S-399. from Michael D'Agostino regarding Standing and Scalar waves
492
S-354. from Andrew Potter regarding room-temperature semiconductors
From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
Date: Sun, July 11, 2004 10:18 am
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Mark,
For my Technical Writing final project I'm doing a report on room-temperature superconductors.
Check out some of this information I've found:
From theoretical physicist Michio Kaku:
"Every kid wonders how big, bulky reindeer can fly. In holiday blockbusters such as
'Harry Potter' and 'Lord of the Rings', we see magicians flying on broomsticks. Is the notion
of flying feasible?
"Scientists today can duplicate flying in the laboratory using powerful magnets. We
can even levitate a train a tiny bit so it floats on air. But to fly like a reindeer, you would
need room-temperature superconducting magnets. Which we don't have yet.
Presently, we still have to cool our magnets to near absolute zero. But one day, if we
discover room temperature superconductors, this could spark a second industrial
revolution."
From UNITEL's Larry Maurer:
> "The key to our system, we believe, lies in the close hexagonal-packed "honeycomb"
lattice of flux zones which naturally occur in niobium which is a natural Type II
superconductor.
>
> "The honeycomb lattice is indeed the high-temperature superconductor key as I
understand it. I found an article stating the universe was virtually a CHP lattice structure
on the scale of 10-75 which seems to make sense. However, I haven't seen any further
mention or proof of it."
From KeelyNet:
"As Einstein has shown, the observed speed-of-light is always a constant because the
length of an object contracts in the direction of motion and its local time rate slows in
perfect balance. Reynolds' theory enables me to show that the mechanism whereby this
occurs is inherent in the very structure and dynamics of Reynolds' medium.
"This medium is granular -- composed of uniform, spherical grains much smaller than
subatomic particles and filling the entire Universe. In fact, it is the Universe. In matterfree space, the grains are hexagonally arrayed and almost close-packed."
Interesting, Aye?!
493
S-355. from Andrew Potter regarding on-board power supplies (for UNITEL)
From: Andrew Potter <potterae@email.uc.edu>
Date: Mon, July 12, 2004 5:49 am
To: lmaurer1101@hotmail.com
cc: kram@stealthskater.com
Larry,
If you are dealing with 2 very powerful oppositely-charged electromagnets in your ship, why not
turn the whole ship into one giant electric generator/motor in order to supply power to the ship? This
motor could also be used to spin the laser beam. The engineering would be simple. Just a basic electric
motor would suffice, commutator, etc. Of course you'd also want a back-up power source such as a
battery. But that wouldn't be a problem because batteries these days are packing more-and-more of a
punch.
Here are some links: http://www.physicscentral.com/lou/lou-02-02.html -andhttp://www.howstuffworks.com/motor.htm .
Also, you recently said that you wanted to use diamonds on your craft to produce some of the effects
(BEC, electron cloud, room-temperature superconductor). I believe you were referring to this article:
http://www.physicsweb.org/article/news/7/4/5 .
How does this affect your ship design (especially the lens)? Is the honeycomb structure still
important now that you'll be using diamonds to create the superconducting effects? Will you have to rework the design somewhat?
Best regards,
-Andrew
S-356. from Thomas Skeggs regarding SkyBooks' Montauk series of books
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
Date: Sun, July 13, 2003 9:47 am
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Subject: Philadelphia Experiment Photo
Hello Mark
Hope all is well. I have gone down with a cold within the last few days, unable to do much. I
started writing this e-mail on the July 10.
In my old collection of papers I found a British article called “The Physics of a Flying Saucer“ by
Ted Roach, an Australian Engineer. (The pictures do not appear in his book). In this article was a brief
paragraph on the Philadelphia Experiment. It included 2 photos. The caption reads “The USS Eldridge
and the prototype machinery used in the infamous Philadelphia Experiment".
There are no credits to these pictures. The article appeared in the now defunct "Alien Encounters"
Magazine September 1997. I don’t know if the pictures are genuine. The description in Chica Bruce’s
494
book tends to match up with the photographs. (I attached one photo in JPEG format. I can send the
other if you want a copy.)
Last week, I ordered some books including The Philadelphia Experiment: Murder which you pointed
out. Plus I ordered Montauk Revisited and the Pyramids of Montauk. They arrived today [July 10].
I was taken aback by some of the claims made by Preston Nichols. I see what you really mean when
he goes off on a tangent. I thought his first book was too unbelievable. I have only flicked through
them. The remote-viewing data points to a scheme where children were being used in the program. It
relates to the strange and disturbing dreams. Nichols points this out in his book. But I think he's offthe-mark with his blue-eyed blonde-haired kiddies and the Aryan connection. The teenager that I "saw"
had brown hair. There was a lab in New York State which was trying to expand the psychic potential of
children. It closed down in 1978 following an arson attack.
I also read some of The Philadelphia Experiment: Murder on the technology used in that test. It's
similar to Montauk. The difference is the Philadelphia Experiment used an AC rotating magnetic
field with low-voltage high-currant coils. The Montauk Project used a UHF microwave system
linked to a 3-coil antenna array to produce rotating magnetic fields that are sensitive to conscious
thoughts (like intent).
In the Philadelphia Experiment system, the people go wherever the ship goes back-and-forth in
space and time. The Montauk system works on the principle that a psychic can mentally direct where
objects go within the influence of the magnetic field. The purpose is to produce a stable connection
between 2 different sets of space-time coordinates. (But this also depends on the stability of psychic’s
mind).
In an e-mail I sent you, I stated that the Montauk Delta-T Antenna may act like a electronic orgone
accumulator. I have been doing some new research that may show that the entire Montauk system may
have acted as a "resonant circuit" (which is a type of reactive circuit capable of resonance). A series
resonant circuit uses a resistor, inductor, and a capacitor arranged in series. Resonance occurs in such a
circuit when the impedance is the minimum and the currant amplitude is the maximum. I have found
the equations for such circuits. And I think I can make up a small prototype based on remote-viewing
data and the research I have done recently.
In the Pyramids of Montauk on page 78, there is a photo of a church. I don’t know if the teenager I
"saw" was at this church. I only saw the interior -- not the exterior. Something terrible happened and
the teenager sought sanctuary within the church.
There is also a chapel on the Montauk AFB. Dreams are considered to be the "soul product" of the
unconscious mind and are only experienced by the individual. But I think some dreams can be altered in
some way to "project a message". In that way, people can share the same dream. It's commonly used in
remote-influencing where you can actually induce someone to have nightmares. You can send a
message like "stay away" or "help me". The trick of dealing with remote-influenced dreams is to look at
it rationally and not jump to conclusions too quickly.
Since 2001, I have been having strange dreams about a "syndicate" headed by a professor of modern
history, a French-African missionary, and 2 university students. (There are other members, too.) They
had sent up a tented camp in the Sahara desert. And they recruit people with special skills to carry a
series of tasks to help people.
495
The last dreams were in the beginning of April when a man informed me of something to do with
travel between June 15-21. I cannot recall of it. Another involved southern Iraq when the war was on. I
saw something in the Philadelphia Experiment Murder on pages 142-143 regarding a strange cult called
Ong's Hat. So I ordered a copy of Ong's Hat by Joseph Matheny.
So far, I'm really pleased that I cannot find any connection between the Ong's Hat or the dreams
regarding the "syndicate" that I keep dreaming of. It's all very strange stuff. I have tried to give up
doing research into time-travel but I always seem to end-up doing some more work on the subject. I
posted a message on TTI in April that I was giving it up. I used the login name of "TGS".
I'm actually in the early stages of booking a 5-day trip to New York. It's still uncertain at the
moment. There are some problems I need to sort out on my end. I have always wanted to go there. I
think it will a once-in-a-lifetime experience due the very high costs involved.
All the best
Tom
S-357. from Iona Miller regarding her essays on Consciousness
To: stealthskaters@hotmail.com
From: Iona Miller <iona_m@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, August 9, 2003 2:02 pm
Subject: Hello from Iona Miller/Quantum Bioholo
Hey, Stealth Skater!
I could find everything on your site but your name … haha!
My buddy chaotician Chris King found your mirror of my paper "Quantum Bioholography" and
brought it to my attention. You have a very intriguing group of papers on your site, and several of my
friends are there ;D
496
I thought you might like to know that a simpler of version of "QB" appears in this month's Nexus
magazine under the title "From Helix to Hologram". [I will forward a copy from my Asklepia mailbox.]
This follows my 2-part series there on Schumann Resonance and HAARP (one of which Duncan has
posted at Nexus online). I have also sent him pieces on Neurotheology and a new 10K word essay on
modern Psi research largely on our work at Emergent Mind. Be sure to check out the new JNLRMI
issue on remote-viewing.
Now that you've had this oblique introduction, you may want to visit my homepages and those of my
former husband who is also posting my new writing at http://nwbotanicals.org
Good work spreading this research and helping people shortcut their surfing process. You are
welcome to write me. Add a link to my homepages somewhere if you like.
Cheers,
Iona Miller
S-358. from Thomas Skeggs regarding current status on his projects
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Subject: Updates-News-FTA
Date: Fri, August 22, 2003 4:14 pm
Hello Mark,
Hope all is well in West Virginia.
I have been doing a lot of thinking regarding some of the projects I have been work on. I have made
some very costly mistakes recently. I have also had a problem with my back following the accident I
had in June when I fell down a grass bank and landed in a flower bed. I was trimming the bank with a
large brush cutter which landed on top of me. I ended up in a minor injuries unit. The legal dispute
does not seem to be going to well. Unknown to me, there was a deadline in force. My appeal may be
turned down cause I appealed after the deadline.
The FTA has almost come to a halt -- mainly due trying to find the right parts. Finding a company
which would supply with 7071 aero-grade aluminum has proven to be almost impossible. I am also
seriously over-budget. So I have put the construction on hold. Another problem is the size of the
capacitors. They hold a charge of between 2-6 Farads depending on the dielectric materials used in the
caps. And the energy output is the Megawatt range. One idea was to fill the caps with distilled water
which has a dielectric constant of 80K. But if the caps fail, the energy release could be explosive! The
caps have a diameter of 30 cm. And they are made of glass with only a wall thickness of 2-3mm.
The airframe has been a real problem, too. It required a large 2-meter triangular insulating plate to
isolate the top section charged positive with the bottom section charged negative. The insulating plate is
4mm thick. But it's too flexible. I was adding a lot of aluminum to stiffen it. But this has added to the
overall weight. The electronics have also caused problems where more larger batteries had to be added.
Which adds to the weight. So the FTA Defiance is grossly overweight now.
I have dropped the magnetic teleportation prototype completely due to the cost overruns of the
FTA. I have also stopped work on the PSI and time-travel research due to costs. The trip to New York
497
cost me more than I planned. But I am glad that I did go earlier or I would have been caught up in that
black out.
The only good news is that I found my written notes I wrote some 9 years ago for a rocket plane. I
did some work on this years ago as a hobby. Rockets are easy to build. The drawback is that they burn
a lot of fuel and they are noisy. They can get very hot-quickly. But I saw an article in a magazine about
a company making rocket planes (I think their website is at www.xcor.com).
I also explored using rocket motors on the FTA some years where I would use water converted into
hydrogen and oxygen. But I ran into problems where I needed to machine parts for a prototype. Soon I
hope to have the right tools to machine my own parts. The idea for this came from articles in Nexus
magazine about articles on running a car on water!
Well must go now.
All the best
Tom
S-359. from Thomas Skeggs regarding "stargate" rumors
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Re: my updates ...
Date: Sun, August 31, 2003 5:20 pm
from: <kram@stealthskater.com>
> Hi Tom!
>
>
I completed another batch of updates to my site. What would probably be of most
interest to you is an interactive chat on a UK-based UFO network by former ELINT Sgt. Dan
Sherman of "Project Preserve Destiny" fame. His "intuitive communications" seem parallel
to remote-viewing abilities. The particular article I uploaded can be accessed at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Sherman_3.doc . British citizens are also
asking him about his involvement in Project Stargate (which I thought was just a sci-fi tv
program). All of his stuff is on the http://www.stealthskater.com/Sherman.htm page.
>
>
Also added archived interviews with Col. Corso, Bob Lazar, and NATO SHAPE
attache Robert Dean, "Project Pounce" Col. Steve Wilson =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Corso_02.doc, .../Lazar_04.doc,
.../Lazar_05.doc, .../Lazar_06.doc, .../Dean_01.doc, .../Dean_02.doc, .../Wilson_01.doc .
>
>
There's an excellent site at http://www.swa-home.de also. An excerpt from
Bearden's book on Soviet scalar weaponry research hints at explanations for UFO propulsion
as well as the Philadelphia Experiment science =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Bearden_22.doc .
>
> All for now -> -- Mark
498
Hello Mark -Thanks for the 2 e-mails.
I saw that you thought "Stargate" was just a TV show. Have you read the Stargate Conspiracy by
LynnPicknett and Clive Prince? One man who caught my attention in the book was Dr Andrija
Puharich - the man who introduced Uri Geller to the World in the late 1970s. Purarich also set up his
own private research lab called Lab Nine in at Ossining north of New York City along the Hudson river.
He conducted a series a experiments with some gifted children who had pronounced psychic
abilities. The lab was funded by one of Canada's richest families -- the Bronfmans who ran the Seagram
liquor business. Purarich worked in U.S. intelligence and he work on MK-ULTRA project. He was
involved heavily involved in work similar to Sgt. Sherman. Purarich was using the gifts kids to channel
messages from alien beings. And it was a major player in a cult known as "The Nine".
The authors suggest that "The Nine" may have been invented by Puharich as an experiment to get
people to believe in outrageous things. The cult had a large following include some influential
businessmen and women, psychics, scientists, writers, artists, and politicians-some senior members like
Al Gore.
In 1977-78, Lab Nine was burnt down following an arson attack. The children were forced to leave
and Purarich fled to Mexico. He blames the arson attack on the CIA because he had claimed they
wanted to take over the Project. Some claimed that the kids were traumatized by the arson attack and by
being split up following 3 years of living together in a tight-knit community.
Purarich was also a close friend of writer James Hurtak and Thomas Bearden who conducted
research for the U.S. Army in psychotronics in the late 1970s.
Another good book is called The Hunt For Zero Point by Nick Cook (a writer for Jane's Defence
Weekly). Cook digs deep into the world of black projects to seek out research into anti-gravity. Cook
believes that "Project Rainbow" was a hoax and was implemented in the 1950s to discredit Thomas
Townsend Brown.
I think I also recently made another mistake. I had the address of that company I mentioned when
conducting experiments into making my biophysical-biophotonic field visible to other people at distance
locations. I found the address last week, so I wrote them a letter and sent it to them in Los Angeles.
Now I think that could be a grave mistake.
Last week or so has been hell! Some drunk driver crushed his car into the front garden destroying a
wall and a row of shrubs. Which happened about 3 am. 9 policemen and women turned up in 5 police
cars and blocked the road. Then the 2 dogs escaped at work. So the police and dog wardens were out
looking for them cause they will attack and try to kill other animals. They found them and put them in a
kennel for a few days. And I saw my doctor to get some stronger pain killers for my back because it
maybe due to arthritis.
I have been working on the FTA. But progress has been very slow. I have got some of the computer
input/output boards working and have doing some programming using Visual Basic to develop some test
programs.
I have been searching my computers for old copies of any info I have left on the "Star Chamber".
Once I have got them all together, I can start to edit them into a single book.
499
Well, must go
Tom
S-360. Larry Maurer discusses concepts with "B.G." & Ed Halerewicz, Jr.
>From: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>
>To: hal_warp@hotmail.com
>Cc: "B.G."@t-online.de
>Subject: Fwd: Re: Inverse Faraday Effect in High Intensity Laser Produced Plasmas
>Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 23:14:11 +0000
>
>Ed:
>
>I do not understand how you find the seems very unlikely: "than lenses in combination with
microwaves can produce a 1039 G field, it reeks to much of perpetual motion in my humble
opinion." Since we are talking about an extremely large diameter (4 ft.) CPA laser lens with the
extremely powerful potential of table-top CPA lasers with small 1 cm dia. beams. Matti Pitkanen
fairly supported your math description as well. I know it seems unfathomable in strength. But as
John A. Wheeler and Gerard t'Hooft pointed out to Michael, we need a tremendous amount of power
in order for our system to work.
>
>Certainly I know it is something that we did not want to bring up as we only want to stick to our
patent and our technology without any UFO stuff since it is the truth of how we first started out with
our design we are confronted with the fact that we have the Eugene, OR Police dept. and the many
witnesses from various citizens of Eugene reporting the very vehicles we saw from close range. We
are reluctant to talk to them again. But we have set up a meeting with retired Police Chief John
Rutledge and Lt. Horton.
The fact remains that this design obviously does work and we believe we have completely figured
the vehicles in question (radar invisibility and all) system out. I cannot just let our endeavors be
blown off as if the design came from some pipe dream or something while knowing full well that
foreign entities in Japan or Europe be constructing prototypes as we speak. There may be some
technical value in discussions of the descriptions of the various sightings such as when the craft
accelerated, they seemed to throw off more sparks from the stern; the orange-ish color of the sparks;
the size and magnitude of some of the sparks (as big as grapefruits); and the "snaking" of the
vehicles (under acceleration) that was as if the craft were aligning themselves like a piece of metal to
a strong magnet.
>
>Certainly we have to keep "tongue in cheek" concerning these sightings when describing our
design in technical terms as there is a difference in what we saw as compared to what we can
actually build. All I have to say is, Ed, that we have pretty much figured all the technical
information needed down to the last nut and bolt here. Michael Miller is certainly brilliant enough in
his knowledge of quantum physics which has been tested by the very best in scrutiny of his
knowledge along with my 30+ years in engineering in both structural and mechanical disciplines.
UIC & KHD have written the contract for the construction and testing of our initial prototype which
also means a lot. So, Ed, I think that your math description along with rest of the technical review is
right on and definitely not "IF-fy". I firmly believe it is not just our chance to understand this
wonderful technology but your chance as well. Whoever was behind flying those vehicles that got
500
our vivid attention definitely made a serious mark in giving us the right criteria in their antics they
produced during their flights on the occasions we speak of.
>
>I look forward to hearing anything positive concerning your technical review which Michael & I
are ready to debate on at anytime. I am now just finishing the scale model of the larger cigar-shaped
vehicle for a discussion of "show and tell" when we sell our books and meet with various
organizations including the Eugene police and the FBI.
>
>Regards,
>Larry
>
>>From: "Edward Halerewicz, Jr." <hal_warp@hotmail.com>
>>To: <520011760580-0001@T-Online.de>,"Larry Maurer"
>><lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>,<halgravity@yahoo.com>,<dre1101@yahoo.com>,<froning
@flagstaff.az.us>,<mcke8344@cox.net>,<rgrunt@yahoo.com>,<Puthoff@aol.com>,<yminami@pq.jp.nec.com>,<potterae@email.uc.edu>
>>Subject: Re: Inverse Faraday Effect in High Intensity Laser Produced Plasmas
>>Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 03:18:06 -0500
>>
>>Greetings,
>>
>>I don't believe existing experiments prove that the propulsion concept would work, if it was
possible to "teleport" an apple from New York to Hawaii you would have something. But at
present there is only circumstantial evidence which backs the propulsion concept, I concede
that CPA interpretation of the laser plasma may increase the magnetic field strength, although it
still seems very unlikely than lenses in combination with microwaves can produce a 1039 G
field, it reeks too much of perpetual motion in my humble opinion.
>>
>>To create a stealth effect with the smart skin you would likely not need to bend radar waves,
you could possibly do one of two simpler things. You could use the electron cloud to scatter
incoming radar waves and shift them to different frequencies so that they become useless in
detecting a craft. Secondly you may try to create an oscillation with the SEDs which match the
radar frequency, you could then have the electron cloud act as a carrier source so that radar
emissions flow around a craft. It probably won't be easy, but it may be easier to pursue those
choices rather than attempting to bend or absorb radar waves with exotic spacetime "warping."
>>
>>As far as reflecting spacetime, I very much think that is simply wishful thinking, the idea
that neutrinos could be responsible for gravitation is very hard to swallow. Gravitons in theory
should be of spin two variety and have zero mass, neutrinos have mass and are fermions,
neutrinos form this reasoning can be ruled out. So I found Barret's interpretation which "B.G."
quoted somewhat questionable, although the modulated wave guide concept seemed
interesting. Even so the EM effects on metric perturbations would be small, to be engineered
would require tapping into the various quantum potentials of EM radiation which matter can
detect require a detailed stochastic analysis of the electromagnetic vacuum to say the least.
>>
>>Lochak's paper only seems to use field theory to justify the monopole, although it offers no
experimental consequences of their presence which would reveal their existence so that must be
taken with a grain of salt. The ionized neutrino=monopole stems from applying the fine
structure constant to the properties of the monopole, further according to Lochak's paper this
ionization is caused by tachyons, which causes other problems. The ground state of g=0 for the
501
neutrino seems unlikely if the ionization level is~68.5 e (eq. 5.20), by reasoning of the
Schoerdinger wave equation, g may approach 0 for the neutrino do to its low mass however for
ionization requires a ground state higher than zero, since neutrino mass is small may be the
reason for this however this would only apply for lone neutrinos, the monopole energy seems
more like a the wave nature create by the neutrino interacting with another particle which
creates a high magnetic potential.
>>
>>Lastly Woodside only offered a research proposal and not much beyond that. In short I
consider these monoploe analogies of gravitation too full of holes to be taken seriously,
accepting such interpretations for "spacetime reflections" at best would be pseudo science so I
strongly caution against this interpretation.
>>
>>----- Original Message ---->>From: "B.G."@t-online.de>
>>To: "Larry Maurer" <lmaurer1101@hotmail.com>; <halgravity@yahoo.com>;
>><dre1101@yahoo.com>; <froning@flagstaff.az.us>; <mcke8344@cox.net>;
>><rgrunt@yahoo.com>; <Puthoff@aol.com>; <hal_warp@hotmail.com>;
>><y-minami@pq.jp.nec.com>; <potterae@email.uc.edu>
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:01 PM
>>Subject: Inverse Faraday Effect in High Intensity Laser Produced Plasmas
>>
>>Larry and Ed,
>>
>>I again read through the paper "A Physical Review of UNITEL’s proposed Aerospace
Vehicle" to be published in the Journal of Advanced Propulsion Methods.
>>>
>>>"The plasma laser according to UNITEL’s design proposal is powered through a
microwave frequency horn, as microwaves pass through the lens the design
hypothesizes that they are phase shifted to the RGB optical spectrum, forming a
coherent packet of group waves (or a beam of white light). The crystal induced phase
then again by UNITEL’s proposal begins a 720-rotation of the laser plasma."
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>"While it is conceivable that charges rotating near the speed of light can produce
high energy magnetic fields, its is most certainly unclear how such fields can create a
direct interaction with the ZPF. The only clue from the considerations above is the fact
that through quantum field theory the laser plasma could create a topological charge
field which would mimic the field properties of the theoretical monopole."
>>....
>>>
>>>"As monopoles aren’t allowed to exist classically without a symmetrical geometric
property known as duality it may be possible for an artificial monopole to induce a
symmetry breaking of classical field theory which may result in the presence of ultra
high energy scales (it is also believed that monopoles haven’t been observed directly
because there masses may be greater than what current particle accelerators can produce
[16]). However the above possibility is only speculation and Unitel doesn’t seem to
give any further clues as to how such an interaction with the ZPF can take place. At best
it seems that producing a high strength magnetic field is possible in theory, but how
such fields could be created in practice remains an open question."
502
>>
>>----->>
>>The attached paper (see appletonife.pdf) deals with the generation of magnetic fields in
laser-produced plasmas. "One particular phenomenon, the inverse Faraday effect (IFE), has
been a source of some controversy as theoretical predictions are in disagreement. IFE is a
magneto-optical phenomenon in which the propagation of circularly polarized radiation
through a non-linear medium induces an axial magnetic field along the direction of
propagation."..."For 1µm laser radiation at I = 1019 Watts/cm2 and a plasma density of 8 x
1020cm3 recent calculations predict a magnetic field of greater than 10 MG which should be
localised in space to the focal region of the intense laser pulse."
>>
>>----->>
>>Ed continues in his review paper (see MQT.pdf) on page 10 and 11:
>>
>>>"UNITEL also makes the claim that the monopole like state their ship mimics is
capable of reflecting spacetime [2], but the how is somewhat elusive. The potential
benefit of this is that the craft could be isolated in its own mini-universe or baby
universe, and therefore the craft as a whole would not be limited in its tunneling ability.
Even under the scenario where the laser-hull can exist in the same quantum state as
described in Section 3.1, the tunneling ability of the craft would be limited to the
particles on the hull of the craft. However if spacetime could be reflected then all that
would be required for the whole of the ship to tunnel is to have the baby universe mimic
the quantum state of the laser-hull configuration. There are however problems which
can arise from this interpretation, the first is that nothing is known to “reflect
spacetime” so this argument is very speculative to say the least. The second problem is
the nature of the proposed interaction suggest that the crafts baby universe would reside
in AdS spacetime."
>>>....
>>>"What is further needed is a description of what theoretical effects must occur to
produce the proposed high field strength, as well to state the strengths which existing
technologies can produce in order to demonstrate its usefulness as a realistic propulsion
system."
>>
>>I agree with Larry that we should discuss several more applications of the smartskin and
various effects to test for such as bending or absorbing radar waves.
>>
>>Larry wrote:
>> "As far as I can see most everything that was theoretical concerning our propulsions
sytem has been proven with working devices. Monopoles have not been actually
observed as yet but Berry's phase for the photon (monopole effects) has recently been
tested successfully in Physical Review Letters as you know that back in 1986 Tomita &
Chiao have produced the Berry's phase effect with RF waveguides and optical fibers.
Our CPA laser design in the space vehicle will produce the same effect only with much
more power (fusion). I know Ed Halerewicz has conservatively estimated 1040 Gauss in
the beam to attract the ship which is phenomenal by itself; but we will have much
stronger effects with flux pinning CPA system producing strong quantum effects. "
>>
503
>>Should we also quote the work of Barrett and Lochak in this context? I mean for the
manuscript to be published at the German Aeronautics Congress in November 2003. What
can "reflect spacetime"? What are monopoles according to the view of Barrett and Lochak?
>>
>>Barrett was quoted:
>>
>>A new conception of magnetic monopole is presented based on (1) a distinction
between descriptions of medium-independent fields and the constitutive relations to the
medium in which they exist, and (2) the magnetic monopole defined as the excited state
of a neutrino (Lochak, II). Using twistor formalism, it is shown that the interactive
exchange between electromagnetic fields and the space-time metric (gravitational
metric or aether) is a second-order differential mapping of the A-vector potential onto
the metric (aether) provided by the neutrino-antineutrino pair concept (Lochak).
>>
>>The excited state of the neutrino, i.e., the magnetic monopole is proportional to the
rate of change of the real part of the dielectric and magnetic susceptibilities and also of
the rate of change of the neutrino, is a phase change which is proportional to the rate of
change of the imaginary part of the dielectric and magnetic susceptibilities and also of
the electrical and magnetic conduction. Thus, the electromagnetic field and the spacetime metric (neutrino network) have an independent or inherent existence, but the
excited states (magnetic monopole) and phase changes of the neutrino have a dependent
existence derived from fluctuations in the electromagnetic field aforementioned.
Justification for field-metric exchanges is found is the requirement for entropy-energy
balance conservation between fields and metric.
>>
>>The twistor formalism is only exactly applicable to the electromagnetic field
conditioned by polarization modulation (an angular momentum twistor). The
electromagnetic field without polarization modulation is well-known to be of U(1)
symmetry and thus of non-Abelian Yang-Mills form. Conditioning the U(1)
electromagnetic field into SU(2) form, in effect, adds a degree of freedom to the field.
>>
>>The consequences of this new picture are both an understanding of the ubiquitous
nature of the magnetic monopole leading to a reformulation of Maxwell's theory, as
well as an approach to the unification of electromagnetism and gravitational theory.
>>
>>The major conclusion is that the relation of local fields and their metric is governed
by an adiabatic polarization modulation waveguide. Experimental testing of this theory
can proceed at radar, infrared and visible frequencies. While the necessary speed of
polarization modulation at optical frequencies (in the picosecond range) is quite
difficult to obtain technically, the necessary speeds required for polarization modulation
at infrared and radar frequencies are easily obtained.
>>
>>-->>See also the Lochak link with reference to: W.A. Rodrigues, Jayme Vaz, and E.
Recami Free Maxwell Equations, Dirac Equation and non-dispersive debroglie wavepackets Courants, Amers Ecueils en Microphysique, G. Lochak and P. Lochak, eds., p.
379-392 (1993).
>>
>>http://www.recom.hotmail.ru/LOCHAK_MONOPOLE.doc
>>
504
>>The symmetry between Electricity and Magnetism and the problem of the
existence of a Magnetic Monopole
>>
>>They describe two charge conjugated particles — a monopole and an antimonopole — with the same charge constant but opposite helicities and going up and
down the time. The charge operator G is thus related to the helicity and our monopole
appears as a kind of excited neutrino : the system (8.4) reduces to the neutrino twocomponent equations if g = 0.
>>>
>>>Therefore, this monopole may be considered as a "magnetically excited" neutrino.
More exactly, we have a family of monopoles with different values of n and the neutrino
is the ground state with n = 0. It is thus natural to ask the question : is it possible that
such monopoles have not only electromagnetic but weak interactions? And this question
leads to another one: is it possible to produce monopoles in weak reactions instead of
neutrinos? If it is so, there must be different families of monopoles associated with the
different leptons e, m and t. Finally, this leads to the hypothesis that these monopoles
could play a role in the magnetic activity of the sun, in particular in the sunspots. Apart
from the neutrinos produced by weak interactions responsible for the solar energy, massless monopoles could appear and, contrary to the ordinary neutrinos, they would undergo
an important loss of energy in the condensed matter and it could be a possible
explanation for the lack of registered solar neutrinos.
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>6. A spinor wave equation for a magnetic monopole.
>>>
>>>Now, we shall find a wave equation for a magnetic monopole. It will be shown that
the famous Dirac equation for the electron admits not only one local gauge invariance but
two — and only two. As it is known, the first invariance (the ordinary phase invariance)
corresponds to an electric charge
>>; the second one corresponds to a magnetic monopole. The new spinorial equation so
obtained describes, in quantum terms, the Curie symmetry laws, and we shall see that
new symmetries are involved, that can be given only in quantum mechanics, without any
classical equivalence : especially the correct definition of an anti-monopole.
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>7. Symmetries of the wave equation.
>>>
>>>a) Gauge invariance.
>>>
>>>By definition, eq. (6.29) is invariant with respect to the chiral gauge transformation
(6.23). This entails the conservation of the axial current that will play the role of a
magnetic current :
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>It must be noticed that this magnetic current is not parallel to the electric current and
that its pseudo-tensorial variance is in accordance with the Curie laws. The question of its
space-like character will become clear a little further. The same expression for the
505
magnetic current was previously suggested by Salam [41] for reasons of symmetry, but
here, it is deduced from a wave equation and a gauge condition.
>>>
>>>b) CPT.
>>>
>>>In this formulae, the most important point is that the charge conjugation does not
change the sign of the magnetic constant of charge. In the next section, we shall see what
exactly charge conjugation means, but we can already assert that two conjugated
monopoles have the same charge constant and that two monopoles with opposite charges
are not charge conjugated: changing g in - g in eq. (6.29), we find a new equation which
is not unitary equivalent to the original one. Therefore, we cannot create or annihilate
pairs of monopoles with opposite charges g and - g, in the way pairs of electric charges
are created or annihilated. The properties of charge conjugation of eq. (6.29) show that
there is no danger of an infinite polarization of vacuum which could occur from the zero
mass of our monopole and it shows that one cannot invoke the hypothesis of great masses
to explain the rarity of monopoles or, at least, the difficulty to observe them. The fact that
chiral invariance and conservation of magnetism are easily broken shows that, more
probably, monopoles are abundant in nature and that the difficulty of the isolation of one
of them is not a question of energy. But what are conjugated monopoles ?
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>8. Weyl's representation. Two-component theory.
>>>
>>>They describe two charge conjugated particles — a monopole and an anti-monopole
— with the same charge constant but opposite helicities and going up and down the time.
The charge operator G is thus related to the helicity and our monopole appears as a kind
of excited neutrino : the system (8.4) reduces to the neutrino two-component equations if
g = 0.
>>>
>>>.....
>>>
>>>The important point is that w is not quantized: the monopole in a coulombian electric
field is always in a ionizing state. This fact, predicted by Dirac, may be guessed for two
reasons : 1) Because we know the spiraling motion on the cone described in the classical
case by Poincaré and we know that our equation has the Poincaré equation as a classical
limit. 2) The potential B given in (5.15) has an infinite string and thus, the wave equation
cannot have square integrable solutions.
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>In other words : 1) The electric current becomes isotropic, but this is not interesting
for us, because we have supposed that the particle has no electric charge ; 2) More
interesting is the fact that the magnetic current vanishes for a pair of charge conjugated
monopoles, although their charges are not of opposite sign. If we were living in an aether
made of such pairs of monopoles, it would be very difficult to observe them, which
means that perhaps the apparent rarity of monopoles is not due to a true rarity, but to the
difficulty of observing only one of them. It must not be forgotten that we are living in a
world full of electrons and that it is not so easy to "see" one of them !
>>>
>>>.…
506
>>>
>>>14. The presence of tachyons in the non linear monopole equation.
>>>
>>>This is the dispersion relation of a supraluminal particle, a tachyon, the theory of
which was extensively developed for many years, in particlular by E. Recami and
coworkers [51], [52], [53]. The wave equation (13.4) seems to be the first one in which
tachyon solutions appear, although it was originally written for quite independent
reasons. This nonlinear equation was more accurately described in some works in view of
finding soliton solutions and stability properties [54], [55]. Nevertheless, the following
result is unpublished :
>>>
>>> Consider the nonlinear equations (13.4) in the case of a coulombian electric field,
that is with a pseudo-potential (5.15) or (5.16). The equations cannot be separated as
were the equations (8.4) and the 2´2 matrix operators (11.1) cannot represent the total
angular momentum.
>>>
>>>....
>>>
>>>15. Miscellaneous remarks.
>>>
>>>1) A geometric property. When m (r2) is constant in eq. (13.2) and (13.4), it was
shown (see [12], [40]) using an older work of Rodichev [56]), that the presence of a
monopole may be considered as a local torsion of an affine twisted space, the total
curvature of which is : R = Const. ´ r2. Therefore, an aether made of pairs of monopoles
is a flat space (because in this case, r = 0) and the question of the observability of
monopoles may be expressed in a geometrical form : if such an aether do exist, what
must be done in order that a local torsion appear?
>>>
>>2) A possible relation between magnetic monopoles and weak interactions.
>>>
>>>We know that the equations (6.28) or (8.4) give the neutrino equations as a particular
case, for g = 0, and g is quantized by the Dirac condition (5.8) (which is also a
consequence of our equations) :
>>>
>>>.....
>>>
>>>Therefore, this monopole may be considered as a "magnetically excited" neutrino.
More exactly, we have a family of monopoles with different values of n and the neutrino
is the ground state with n = 0. It is thus natural to ask the question: is it possible that such
monopoles have not only electromagnetic but weak interactions? And this question leads
to another one: is it possible to produce monopoles in weak reactions instead of
neutrinos? If it is so, there must be different families of monopoles associated with the
different leptons e, m and t.
>>>
>>>Finally, this leads to the hypothesis that these monopoles could play a role in the
magnetic activity of the sun, in particular in the sunspots. Apart from the neutrinos
produced by weak interactions responsible for the solar energy, mass-less monopoles
could appear and, contrary to the ordinary neutrinos, they would undergo an important
loss of energy in the condensed matter and it could be a possible explanation for the lack
of registered solar neutrinos.
507
>>
>>Dr. Myron Evans recently wrote:
>>>
>>>This shows that electrodynamics must be a higher symmetry gauge field theory
than U(1), and I suggested O(3) electrodynamics (http://www.aias.us, see my 200 page
review "O(3) Electrodynamics" in volume 119(2) of Advances in Chemical Physics).
My latest three papers in Found. Phys. Lett. Develop electrodynamics as a torsion in
general relativity, and shows that electrodynamics must be a wedge product of two
metric four vectors if gravitation is an outer product of two metric four vectors, as in
Einstein's theory of general relativity for gravitation. This procedure unifies the two
fields (gravitation and electrodynamics) with the metric four vector and automatically
shows that electromagnetism is a non-U(1) gauge field theory, because the tangent
space in a U(1) gauge field theory is a scalar. The physical space, however must have
four space-time dimensions, and the electromagnetic potential field must be a tetrad
form. The electromagnetic gauge field is then a torsion form, and the gravitational field
a Riemann form. The Riemann and torsion forms are defined by the Maurer Cartan
equations of differential geometry, which therefore become laws of grand unified field
theory. The topological phase described above is the result of the non-Abelian Stokes
Theorem and is therefore a Hodge or Montonen Olive duality having the important
result of allowing grand unification of the four known fields by identifying the tangent
space of general relativity with the fiber bundle space of gauge field theory. Up to now
this was thought to be impossible because the tangent space was thought to be a
physical space of general relativity and the fiber bundle space an abstract space of
gauge field theory in special relativity. My new equations are generally covaraint for all
four fields, i.e obey the Principle of General Relativity for all four fields. This is an
important advance over the Standard Model.
>>
>>See also:
>>http://www.physics.mq.edu.au/~dalew
>>http://www.physics.mq.edu.au/~dalew/thesis/ResPro3a.ps
>>
>>Investigation of Relativistic Longitudinal Gauge Fields and their Interactions
>>by Dale Alan Woodside
>>
>>Regards,
>>"B.G."
S-361. from Tom Skeggs regarding "defenses" against remote-viewing
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Date: Sat, October 4, 2003 10:57 am
Subject: This e-mail is quite long
Hello Mark,
508
The last few weeks have been a bit unusual at times. About 4 hours after I sent you my last e-mail,
my request was approved by the moderator on Sarfatti's group. I got a chance to look at the messages on
Nick Cook.
I never heard from that scientist [Dr. Reginald Jaynes] you mentioned about doing experiments with
Tesla coils and stop watches. I saw his website a few months ago.
Sarfatti does appear to question if Nick Cook does actually worked for Jane's Defence Weekly. In
Briton, I have seen him on British Television on some news reports during the Iraqi war. I remember a
sign came up with "Nick Cook / Jane's Defence Weekly" on it. So it does appear he still works for
them.
Another thing is when we encounter something which we are skeptical of, what most people do is to
just flick through and look for a clues which supports their views and use it as ammo to prove your
point. Many skeptics do this all the time. And I personally believe we all do it at some time or another.
The real hard-line skeptics just do it more often and get a reputation of debunking other people's work.
I need some time to examine the posts in more detail. I have read the book from cover-to-cover and
I was really taken with it. But Nick Cook does admit he is not a scientist and has to rely on a mysterious
"Deep Throat" figure who claims to be one of Briton's foremost scientist's. So if the book is
disinformation, it maybe the work of the mysterious scientist who was guiding him on what to look for
and what questions to ask etc. It appears some may be shooting the messenger.
The Nazi secret weapons projects are something I examined. I produced my own paper on the
subject which is just a collection of articles and reports on subject. It's not on computer files; I just a
have a hard copies. My computer files were lost during one of those virus attacks.
I also worked at Duxford Aviation Museum in Cambridgeshire during the early 1980s. There was
some canteen gossip about secret WWII aircraft in which some the aircraft technicians would have
loved to get the spanners on. But I do exercise caution with such tales because some do appear to be just
that-canteen gossip. Next thing you know, someone has written a book on the subject claiming it to be
true.
On the other hand, I recall it was at Duxford I first heard the name "Dreamland" where a RAF tech
told us he took part in "Red Flag" exercises there with the RAF and there was an area out of bounds to
all pilots called "Dreamland". And rumor was it was where the USAF tested new aircraft.
On the subject of remote-viewing, I generally see it as a tool. Remote-influencing is the same. And
so is empathic ability. Sometimes I use R-V with search engines on the iInternet to search quickly for
valid information.
There are stories of new technologies designed to detect or destroy remote-viewers. But much of
this is poppycock. One remote-viewer describes "biophysical logic bombs" which act like a virus.
What they are is what is called "negative memes" [habit] which are designed to disrupt the remoteviewer's ability to remote-view. They appear to act like strange attractors where the meme can grow
with each figure of Eight cycle. The negative meme can appear as obsession which can completely take
over the personality of the individual.
Cause some who investigate the meaning of consciousness suggest that the personality can to act
like a strange attractor when viewed within a phase space model. Tim Refat suggested that these
biophysical logic bombs can drive people to take their own lives. The antidote is awareness of a present
509
of something foreign or alien. Then simply use visualization techniques to do some bomb disposal work
and simply implant a positive meme to counteract the negative one. (Remember the "Butterfly effect" in
Chaos theory).
Tesla coils do act as a deterrent. But even a Tesla coil has an 'ON' switch or is connected to the
mains supply.
The only true method against remote-viewing is not technology but psychology if I come up against
a protected location designed to keep the likes of me out. Then there is always a way in or weak link in
the security system. Persistence pays off in the end and you can break or crash the system and gain
access.
The only way to stop a remote-viewer is to damage their confidence in his/her ability to remote-view
by trying to implant negative memes by claiming to you and to others that you are totally wrong. Like
in the "Butterfly effect" where they can sow the seeds of self-doubt. A small effect can lead to large one
over time. A basic understanding of Chaos theory provides a solution in that equal and opposite effect
can also cancel out the effect.
They will try and do anything to induce stress and despair or hopelessness by trying to put you into
situations where you cannot win. "Resistance is futile" is the message that they will try to put across.
Like to imply or project in a public place that you are a lunatic, crackpot, a crank, or a mental case etc.
I think consciousness plays a key role in matters relating to time-travel, remote-viewing,
teleportation. David Deutsch stated in the Fabric of Reality that time is static, time does not flow. It is
Consciousness that flows. Which generate the concept that time seamlessly flows from the Future into
the Past.
I am becoming convinced that the atoms which make up our body simply do not just inhabit the
present "Now" but also inhabit both a few milliseconds in the Future and the Past. It's our
Consciousness that simply defines we are here in the "Now".
I think people with ESP can simply expand their biophysical and other fields into the Past or Future.
Remote-viewing is simply placing you biophysical field to another "Now". Remote-viewing is simply a
discipline to educate the human consciousness to become more flexible on not just to interpret the World
around us but to interact with objects at distance locations.
The Incunabula press catalog appears to be on the right track. But the book is written by someone
who was not a member of that group. And it's published by Sky Books which has a close association
with Dr. David Anderson who got some funding from the Department of Defense in a study on the
nature of memory.
This I know because he was on British TV a few years ago. That's why I sent him my "Tempus
Codex" and "CTC construct" papers. The Incunabula ideas on quantum consciousness, chaos theory,
and quantum mechanics appear to be on track when combined with Eastern ideas on meditation, art, and
music. Like Sufism when combined with Western technology in the form of an isolation chamber or
psychoenergetic generator both in the shape of an "egg".
But there is a lot of disinfo out there like the music-art-mediation plus high technology re-appears in
the papers of the "Wingmakers". Some of it may true. Disinfo is usually a complex mixture of fact and
fiction. I think some of these so-called "leaks" is to get people who a savvy enough to solve problems
510
but stupid enough to publish the answers. Because the powers-that-be know there is a great deal of
talented people out there who can do the work of their best scientists.
Ordinary people have a different mindset to scientists. Like you said, many experts have singular
expertise. And their social status within the scientific community can effect the outcome of their work.
They may not publish the results of tests and theories as they are. They may re-write to make them
more acceptable for the scientific community to except them because they may fear the damage it may
do to their careers and reputation.
This line of work involving teleportation and the means to time-travel requires a multi-disciplinary
approach where you're a "jack-of-all-trades but a master-of-none".
The Incunabula approach to this multi-disciplinary method looks like it has a built-in security
measure where it's up to the individual to find the answers. To reveal all the answers to make
teleportation possible could simply result in the destruction of new places they inhabit and could also
lead to the deaths of the people who live there.
In an ideal world, it would be great to publish everything. But sadly, we live a materialistic world
driven mainly by greed and envy. And if you find Heaven, it could descend into Hell if the wrong kind
of people are allowed unlimited access. Also there are a great deal of people who believe if they can't
have access, they will make sure that no one else can have access.
I also a strange e-mail from a man who I think works for the Soros Foundation in New York
(http://www.soros.org ) . Someone called "Khuffman". It was sent to my Hotmail account and was
headed "ftadefy Lets be friends". The message was blank. I thought it was a virus. But I did a search
and sent a reply. I think my address is blocked. So that's puzzling. It was dated September 21. But I
only noticed it yesterday because my Hotmail account gets lots of junk mail.
Constant testing and contradiction. Seems also be used like a weapon. Where if I write, it someonesomewhere will go out of there way to contradict you removes to prove you wrong. So you doubt
yourself and your ability.
For example, I had this idea that I wrote to the authorities asking about my appeal. I knew they
would not reply because they have what they want. They are so stuck-up and pompous that they will not
reply. So I stated to a few people that I know what they will write. Some excuse about losing the
paperwork, etc. So they get wind of it to contradict my views, to try and reinforce the self doubt.
So in that area, their games are up. They are appearing to be acting in a totally predictable way.
They appear to give the impression that are clever-smarter and the rule of Law is totally on their side
and there is nothing I can do about it. But all problems can be solved. It just requires a multi
disciplinary approach to seek out a solution.
As for constant testing where people know the answer to a question. They know the answer to test
my ability. This is a real bane because I do not have all the answers. Just some of them. If I had all the
answers to questions, I would be a smart-ass -- not a remote-viewer. And no one likes a smart-ass. Also
constant testing stands in the way of doing something for real.
I'm sorry this e-mail is a bit along. But I yesterday, I had one of the strangest events I can recall for
sometime. But it's very difficult to work out. I went to an isolated location and I woke up on a wooded
hillside some 4 hours later. Real strange X-files stuff!
511
We must go for now.
Tom
S-362. from Jonathon Bluestone regarding dimensional portals
From: "Jonathan D. Bluestone" <jondbluestone@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Tue, October 7, 2003 3:02 pm
Subject: Dimensional Portal's
Hi Mark,
Nice to hear from you and thanks for the information. I'm currently working on cataloging
information from old books for a large UFO and mysteries database effort which I hope to get onto the
web in one form or another sometime.
Actually, if you're interested, I may well have a job for your RV friend [Tom Skeggs] of a nature
which I'm sure he will appreciate if he wants it. I'm currently based in Oklahoma City -- not far from a
location, 122nd Street and Broadway Extension. Anyway, I have it on excellent authority (and the
reports of Brad Steiger) that in 1969 the authorities were digging at that location when they uncovered
more than 3,000 square feet of tiled floor from a previous civilization beneath 3 feet of solid rock. Now
if he [Skeggs] can confirm that and possibly explain what it was or what was in this area, I plan to
contact a few of my ESP colleagues and use that data for further research.
I'm also thinking of relocating to Montana for research purposes. But right now, that move seems
uncertain. If you happen to know of anyone who can conduct visualization in regards to this, I would
also be interested in knowing if-and-when my move is likely to happen and what it may well involve. In
regards to these sites which are being shut down because they seem to contain nuggets of truth, may be
it's time some of us used a copy of Getright or Teleport Pro to get those sites and their content before
they vanish as quickly as they spring into being.
In regards to Saddam's "stargates", I'm sorry to report that those rumors are unfounded. But there is
a dimensional portal (or whatever you wish to call it) in the Alps on the border of Tibet/China. Its exact
location is a mystery to me. Bbut it happens to be the only one which I know of and my information
source is about as accurate as it can be. Unfortunately, I cannot and will not mention that source's
nature. You have to trust me on this. But find a RVer and confirm if you wish.
Hey, stay in touch more often!
Best Wishes,
Jonathan Bluestone
S-363. from Jonathon Bluestone regarding "breaking news" at Tinker AFB
From: "Jonathan D. Bluestone" <jondbluestone@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Wed, October 8, 2003 7:05 am
512
Subject: Prepare for an Update
Mark,
Fascinating! I'm quite fond of ancient knowledge. Oh, when I get the chance (which will be in the a
day or so), I have some enlightening information about operations currently taking place here in the
Oklahoma City which relate to energy devices and HPAC developments at Tinker Air Force Base. Can't
say more without compromising you and possibly me. But if the information I've been supplied can be
believed, it is best shared with the community at large.
Jon
S-364. from Bob King regarding "stargates" and past civilizations
From: Bob <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Re: "stargates" near Saddam ???
Date: Sat, October 11, 2003 9:56 pm
> I found a thread which talked about Burisch but then went on to discuss rumors of actual
"stargates" found near Saddam's bunker. (The abstracted document 'Burisch_8.doc' is
attached.) Some regard Iraq as where civilization first sprang up. Wasn't the movie
"Stargate" based in Egypt?
The whole basis for all this is that the civilizations we know of today mostly started in the Middle
East. Which of course accounts for all the different religious attitudes in that area and the conflicts
which have arisen from them. One has to remember that similar archeological findings have now been
made in France, China (Tibet), and South America. A lot of this is tied into the concepts which show
that the original inhabitants of France and South America especially completely disappeared of the face
of the Earth and left few remaining things to even show they were there at all. It also accounts for the
disappearance of the "people" who built the pyramids in China and South America.
The whole subject is very complex and I don't think any positive answer will be found in our
lifetimes -- and maybe never -- because this Civilization is on the verge of collapse which will put
Mankind back many hundreds of years and much more will be lost again during the rebuilding of some
kind of new civilization.
I hope I don't live to see the collapse as the wars we have had up to now are nothing to the
devastation which will occur when it happens this time 'round.
If you doubt this in any way, then go back in History and compare the failures of the earliest
civilizations and the ones following and see how the consequences get more devastating every time.
> Maybe the "weapons of mass destruction" was the stargate and not nuclear or biological???
Far-fetched but interesting reading ...
Not as far fetched as you may think.:-)
513
Regards, Bob
S-365. from Thomas Skeggs regarding remote-viewing "anomalies"
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Date: Thu, October 23, 2003 6:14 pm
Re: Carey Sublette's treatise on Nuclear Weapons Design
Hello Mark,
The subject of remote-viewing nuclear weapons (or any object which emits energy) is a strange even
within the usual subject of RV. What I have read is that different remote-viewers see the remote
locations differently. Some remote-view in color while some in just black&white. Some detect that an
object gives off a glow or aura. I think one remote-viewer says that the nuclear weapons he "sees" give
a green glow.
Sometimes I like to remote in false color where I instruct my biophysical self to seek out an object or
target and detect any energy being emitted. And for my biophysical self to see that energy in the form
of various colors. It was like looking at something using a thermal imaging camera.
Some remote-viewers can also use an energy source to boost something called the "signal line".
This is the subtle connection which exists between the physical remote-viewer and his/her biophysical
self. If you don't have a psychotronic generator, use someone else's. You simply "bilocate" to that
location. Get your biophysical self to interface with the energy source and continue on journey to your
chosen target of interest.
That's why my psychotronic generators are tiny be cause they just provide enough energy to kickstart my biophysical self into remote-viewing mode. The larger psychotronic generators can be
manmade objects or natural or sacred sites.
Prior to the Iraqi war, I did a search for WMD and found very little there at the time. What they did
have was destroyed by UN weapons inspectors. And what the old Iraqi government did was to smuggle
some out into Iran and Syria. I think some was in exchange for more up-to-date weaponry. The invasion
of Iraq has made things worse because people knew where all the WMD were. Now they are spread all
over the Middle East and it's only a matter of time when terrorist groups will use them.
There is exists a probability that a terrorist attack involving chemical or biological weapons may
occur next year (Feb-March or Oct) in a major city along the Eastern seaboard. It may be New York or
Washington again. And it maybe aimed at the metro. This is something I picked up when remoteviewing NYC.
But sometimes I see the impact of an attack and other times I don't. When this happens, it means the
attack is still uncertain. Something has gone wrong which can prevent the attack from taking place. For
example, one of the planners may have been captured or killed, so the attack is cancelled or changed.
But in a way, an attack does seem to fit in with the growing situation. Next year, U.S. elections
occur and terrorists may try and disrupt them. The worst thing that can happen is for the Bush
514
Administration to cancel the elections as it may trigger widespread demonstrations and civil unrest.
Forcing the Government to push for more Dreconian laws which lead to more demonstrations.
What I am sensing is that there are some wealthy business people in the Middle East who want
America to be seriously weakened or destroyed completely. They are simply funding the terrorists as
means to achieve their objects. They know they cannot beat America in an all-out war. So the only way
they can destroy or damage America is to get the Americas to fight each other.
When I keep such info to myself, it usually comes true. Tell someone else and the opposite happens.
In this case, I don't want it to be true.
The "secret" surrounding nuclear weapons (that you allude to) is something like Bruce Cathie
suggesting that nuclear weapons don't always work. I recall reading that he believes the nuclear
weapons can only be detonated at certain locations. But I have not read up in detail on his work, so I
don't know if its true.
-- Tom
S-366. from Thomas Skeggs regarding UFO-technology dependent on consciousness?
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: <kram@stealthskater.com>
Date: Wed, November 5, 2003 7:28 pm
Re: UFO-technology dependent on consciousness ???
Hi Mark,
from: <kram@stealthskater.com>
> Hi Tom!
>
> I came across some researcher named William McDonald who seems to make a living
from a large UFO-related site at http://www.alienufoart.com .
>
> He supposedly enlisted the late John Andrews to make a replica of the purported Roswell
UFO that served as a model for the "Have Blue" and "Tacit Blue" stealth programs (see =>
http://www.alienufoart.com/RoswellUFO.htm , archived as
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Andrews_02.doc ).
>
> Remember what I kept questioning about repeated quotes from great minds who said this
UFO technology was beyond anything they had learned? Here's a quote made by this guy
that may shed some insight (IF it's indeed true):
>
>> "The "Biological/Artificial life Fusion/Interface Hypothesis" is in a nutshell, an
explanation into how artificially intelligent molecularly fabricated vehicles have
achieved the ultimate level that machine technology can achieve; and how it requires
direct physical or transmitted interface with organic neuralganglia tissues (Brainsminds) in order to navigate what so many theoretical physicists call 'Hyperspace',
'subspace', the 'ether', and the 'Zero-Point Energy field'."
515
>> ---Bill McDonald 2003 - Oasis Earth Hypothesis
>> http://www.alienufoart.com/OasisEarth.htm
I have been real busy lately.
The man you mentioned --William McDonald -- may have appeared on a British TV doc a few
years ago. I have the interview on tape. A retired U.S. Army Counter-Intelligence Officer claimed
he was part of a highly secret group called "The Nine". Which reminded me of the strange cult also
called "The Nine". This group was involved in protecting the first nuclear weapons. And the U.S
Army was involved because the Air Force was part of the Army (Army Air Corps) in early 1947. I
think in October it was made in a separate department (USAF).
This idea of using the conscious thoughts of the pilot is something I have been working on with
the FTA. As in RV, you can project your biophysical self to another location when you place a craft,
device, or vehicle within an intense field which shields it from the surrounding universe. Hopefully,
the mass making up object will jump to the location you are projecting your biophysical self. It's
like the mass catches up to your biophysical self. How it's actually done is still puzzling. My money
is on quantum tunneling. But I have not rule out wormholes.
The psychotronic generators are used to boost the amplitude of the biophysical field or self to
move to another location. I also think that the conscious action of moving one's morphogenetic field
would also do the trick. It's real tricky to explain. Especially the additional built-in biofeedback
hardware which connects up the pyschotronic generators with the drive system to generate an intense
field.
Since early October, I have re-started work on producing a ne-yet-small capacitor discharge
drive prototype that I have nicknamed "Cardinal Point". This new device is circular-shaped instead
of triangular. It has 3 heavy-duty capacitors wired to a pair of stainless steel torus-shaped plates. In
the central hole is an electrodynamic heat pump which pumps out hot air, heated by 3 heater
elements. Also there will be a fan blade to force the air between the 2 stainless plates. Then it is
directed downwards to create thrust.
The real trick to create the maximum amount of thrust is the fan blades causes the air to spin,
thus producing a vortex. The device flies on top of an artificial tornado of hot air. To speed up,
develop, and to improve construction, I am contracting parts out to different companies. But I have
hit a few setbacks. I will have to wait up to 9 weeks for parts to arrive. The transformers are on
back-order and will arrive in mid-Nov.
I also hope to restart work on the psychotron biofeedback hardware nicknamed "Firefox" later
this month for a larger model I hope to build next year.
I have just located an ideal location that I have nicknamed "The Shadeworks". During WWII,
the British set up numerous secret factories in woodlands so they would not get bombed. They
called them "Shadeworks" because they will mainly hidden in woodland under cammo netting.
The major problem with the Shadeworks is funding because I would really love to go full-time
on developing the new Cardinal Point FTA. The large workshop is in a real bad state of repair and it
may take a month to make it habitable. But the purpose of the small prototype is to clearly
demonstrate that the technology works. With such a prototype, I maybe able to seek funding from a
European aerospace company.
516
I'll send you some pics later. At the moment, it's just a pile of bits. I also got a CAD program to
design parts with which has proven very useful. I also got a PDF program to convert .docs into .pdf
format. And I have also written some design programs for the new model using Visual Basic.Net to
help me with the maths.
Well, must go now.
Tom
P.S. Is that offer to send me a copy of the UNITEL book still open? I could e-mail my address.
S-367. from Michael D'Agostino regarding rotating induction fields
From: "mangomike1"@yahoo.com
To: stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject: Electrical science fact or fiction
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:23:10 -0000
Hello StealthSkater,
I always enjoy your postings on the "Strange Science" list. I have a question that you might answer
for me. (On other list sites, they will not even post it!)
I stumbled on a website a couple of years ago (unable to locate now) which states either a
symmetrically-shaped capacitor in a continual rotational state or its induction field (if it's in a state of
rotation) will hold/store a "Infinite Charge" and not arc regardless of accumulated charge as long as
rotation is maintained.
From memory, the article claimed the closest explanation lies in Quantum Physics called a "Smeared
Vector". The article also stated if you mount/attach a volt-ohm meter to the rotating capacitor and have
another outside of induction field measuring with brushes, the volt-ohm meter attached will display the
actual voltage while the other volt-ohm meter outside with brush contact will always display 0 (zero).
The article claimed this is due to the different reference frame from which the measurement is taken
from. Sounds like Special Relativity.
Is this science-fiction or is there some truth to the matter of rotating Induction Fields?
I have several friends who have their degrees in EE and one who was an Electronics Warfare Officer
for the U.S. Navy. They either reply "Don`t Know" or "No - due to the Laws of Conservation". But
none of them have ever heard of the Biefeld-Brown effect either!
As crazy as all of this may sound, all I really want is a answer and -- if true -- is there an
explanation?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Mike
-- mangomike1@yahoo.com
517
S-368. from Michael D'Agostino regarding alternative technologies
From: mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Thu, November 6, 2003 12:48 pm
Subject: Re: more background info …
Hello Mark,
There really are no so-called "experts" in the field of theoretical physics. There are those that have
achieved recognition within their educational or social order. And many professors will usually walk
the line because of their positions within the educational systems. They don't want to "make waves" or
"break ranks" unless, of course, their book sales are doing great and they have decided to change their
career path. It's all about money and financial stability.
I believe I already know the answer to my question. It would just make life easier if someone
jumped out and said 'yes' or 'no' -- an infinite charge can or cannot exist in a continually rotating
unidirectional induction field.
I made the choice to retire early at the age of 40. There are some brilliant minds out there. I know I
must have read hundreds of abstracts and manuscripts. Although I may be way off-track myself, who is
really qualified to say. Science is the observation of natural systems in and around us. Until mainstream
science explains or eliminates E/M phenomena and anomalies not covered by Faraday, Maxwell etc., the
search for Truth will continue.
In an article in Time magazine, Feb 24, 2003, page 45 titled: "Cosmic Fingerprint". In the article,
information gathered by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (or W-MAP) was analyzed by the
Goddard Space Flight Center. The W-MAP team said the Universe can be explained with 5 numbers:
(1) The Cosmos is 13.7 billion years old (give-or0take a couple of hundred million years).
(2) The first stars turned on 200 million years after the 'Big Bang'.
Finally, the Universe is made of 3 things;
(3) 4% ordinary atoms
(4) 23 % dark matter
(5) 73 % dark energy
Mark, so here we are in our 4 % Universe. Before, they claimed our recognized universe was 10%.
Now 4%.
It appears as our methods of detection improve our known Universe is shrinking. Methods of
"Linear" detection are Frequency, Amplitude, and Phase of Linear-transverse waves. Linear- transverse
waves must propagate from point 'A' to 'B' through Euclidean Space. Not so for non-Linear Standing
and Scalar waves.
We do not presently have the equipment to detect or measure the non-linear fields/waves other than
measuring impedance in electrical systems.
518
My background is Business. But my passion has always been Science and the study of natural
systems. As a former business person, I'm results-oriented. So this area of unconventional physics is a
real challenge and -- yes! there are a lot of heavy hitters in the field which are recognized by the
mainstream Science community although I'm not interested in recognition. I'm interested in results.
Like you, I was also interested in this UFO phenomena when I was a teen. I remember the
Barney&Betty Hill UFO abduction story and the small details which stuck in my memory. Like the
interior of the craft, no 90-degree corners or angles, everything was rounded which would suggest static
buildup was probably a concern.
I also remember several years ago on the Art Bell show and his web page with supposed pieces from
a UFO craft sent in by several listeners. All of them were sent to an independent lab for testing and
analysis. Most of the pieces did not pan out. They were made right here on Earth although two of the
pieces -- when looked at through an electron microscope -- revealed micro-thin layers of a conductor
and nonconductor material in layers. And the purity was too fine to be made on Earth.
In addition, several UFO books I read when I was a teen stated upon boarding the crashed craft and
inspecting it, the military personnel couldn't find any equipment for flight&field control or even a power
supply.
When comparing the above info with the Biefeld-Brown effect and the model lifters, it hit me!
Just like we now have micro layer thin PCB printed circuit boards which conduct and control how
and where the electricity flows, maybe the UFO craft skin contains the Fight and Field control by virtue
of shaped pattern design micro-etched into the many layers of the skin.
If they were wired in parallel, the operators of such a craft would have complete control over the
numerous field algorithms. It would be a flying capacitor. Logarithmic spirals etched in the surface
designed to operate either clockwise and or counter-clockwise in a sequence to induce field rotation and
phase velocity (not group velocity).
Field Phase velocity can (and often does) exceed the speed-of-light while group velocity of a wave
can travel close to (or well below) the speed-of-light.
If the operators used a unidirectional rotating induction-type field and could selectively at will
activate one-or -more positively charged points on the subsurface of craft skin, it would have directional
control over field being symmetrical (hovering) or asymmetrical (direction of flight).
The shape and patterns etched or printed in the multi-layered skin would be the key when
manipulating field dynamics. Mark, induction fields do not radiate energy away and are non-linear,
although in theory if the entire field was either pulsed at lower frequencies (below the resonate
frequency of the craft), the field would expand by the space it occupied.
Standing and scalar fields cannot be measured over time. Only the space they occupy. The general
rule is the higher the frequency, the smaller the field. And likewise the lower the frequency, the larger
the field.
As far as a power supply, you are going to love this. If the energy is contained in the field, all the
occupants would have to do is increase the frequency of the field in which case it would infold into the
center of craft but continue to operate at higher frequencies. In this scenario, having a small model of
the craft in the center shaft of the craft itself would contain and continue to perpetuate the energy as long
519
as it is in rotation. A unidirectional field would perform and result in craft flight in Euclidean 3-D
space. Although orienting the field in a Bi-directional orientation would open up other modes of timespace relocation without movement as we presently understand it.
This can be built using micro-stripping techniques used in PCB (printed circuit boards) with some
effort. Not impossible. The nice thing is with each set of Field Guide Elements 4 spirals per layer, it
would be a great test bed for testing a wide variety of different field algorithms. Also the thin micro
strips would form a Caduceus Coil winding in center shaft. No sharp or 90-angels present and no
physical contact. Induction fields will do the work.
Using close to zero current with high voltage, adjustable high frequency should have similar results
to the "Electrogravity Biefeld-Brown Effect Lifter" except this would be the "sports car" where the
Lifter is a "Model T".
Now you understand what I'm working on.
On my previous e-mail, I provided you with my snail mail address. I'm still interested in receiving
CD. Thanks, Mark, and keep up the good work enjoyed the exchange.
Best Regards
Mike
S-369. from Michael D'Agostino Technological Progress through Unconventional Thinking
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Fri, November 7, 2003 11:28 am
Subject: Re: the CD is on its way !
Mark,
Looking forward to your CD. I will notify you if not received by mid next week. Mark, you have a
treasure trove of information and very abstract concepts presented on your site. I'm sure the
demographic breakdown of visitors would be interesting ranging from Sci-Fi buffs to those with a
personal(subjective) interest to those trying to rationalize and objectify through science - nature.
Regarding my upcoming project with disc(top & bottom half)-shaped printed circuit boards layered
on each other with special patterns designed for high-voltage/very low-current designed to manipulate
different sequenced field orientation (algorithms) in an effort to achieve increase performance, stability,
and directional flight control, I'm not really looking for recognition or funding. (Although if you wish to
share info with others, that would be fine. Information exchanges are usually beneficial.)
SEE LIFTER'S : http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm
A little background info. Back in 1982, a friend and I came up with the idea of using a model 4
Radio Shack computerd and our own breadboarded circuit to connect one incoming phone caller to
another who just called in on the same hunt group. All of this led to the '976' and '1 900' phone numbers
where people call in to a central number and are randomly connected together to talk, arrange a date, or
meeting etc.
520
My partner and I started it with $20,000 and no competition for over 2 years. Our subscriber base
become nationwide when we launched it on 800s. When the competition grew around us, it was too
late. We undercut the market prices based on our customer volume alone. Many tried to buy us out.
That was business "one". I started several other types of business based on new ideas, new concepts,
and again no competition for a year -or-two.
I was on a 12-year roll until my wife and I decided to sell our businesses and commercial real estate
holdings in San Francisco and -- by choice -- retire from the businesses we started. Traveling, sports,
hobbies, and special interests -- now we had time to really live life and pursue our interests!
I'm unconventional in my manner of operation. I didn't attain this station in Life by running with the
pack or thinking in the conventional way. Example: several months after 09/11/2001 when everyone is
running for cover in the Stock Market, my wife and I purchased a large number of index funds (I call
them no-brainers) QQQ and SPY's. When everyone is selling, we are buying.
Making money seems to be a byproduct if you know when to follow through with action and
confidence. I`m not a day trader although I've been called a futurist by friends when it comes to abstract
concepts. As a former business person, I want results as a bottom line. My status now is 'retired'
although I would come out of retirement and come out if the discovery was a big one.
ZPE (Zero-Point Energy), complex standing and exotic Scalar waves with cascading harmonic
values -- I believe -- can be a gold mine if achieved and implemented properly. (Or at the very least,
bought out by one of the big boys in an effort to stop certain types of tech. to reach the consumer market
places.)
I always try to be careful when working with this kind of material. It's beneficial to know where
objectivity ends and subjectivity begins. The line becomes very narrow sometimes. SEE: PEAR
program (Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research) http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/
Nikola Tesla, Keeley, David Bohm, Hal Puthoff, Thomas Townsend Brown, Tom Bearden, Hugh
Everett, De Witt, Einstein etc. are all brilliant people with the ability to open their minds and express
what they envision.
Mark, what you are providing is important as long as we have the insight of connecting the dots,
applying theory in an objectified manner, and determining application and bringing it to market.
You have probably heard of the Fourier Transform. Well, I suspect our minds are Pattern
Recognition Neural Transform - Filters. Carl Jung called it "collective consciousness". 'Consciousness
Harvesting' is so far beyond physical that you are right to call it metaphysics.
From Nov. 25 to March 4, my wife and I will be in Vietnam visiting her family as we do every year.
I will have access to Internet cafes to check my Yahoo! mail. Your CD will come in handy to continue
my research until I return in March to start the layered PCB construction with a computer CAD
program. It will be a fun project.
Mark, on your site I see "Can Mother Nature be tricked into allowing Macroscopic Quantum
Tunneling to take place? [UNITEL]" If everything around us can be reduced to Electrical(+/-),
Magnetic(+/-), and differential rotational qualities as byproducts of a W rotation, the answer is probably
521
'Yes'. In Hyper- and Hypro-environments, fields may turned inside out of themselves. I suspect Gravity
is actually an Electrical field turned inside out on itself.
Mainstream Science claims based on a Hubble Constant and Doppler Shift, the Universe is
expanding. (Or should I say the space between all things is increasing). Yet the Biefeld-Brown Effect
demonstrates an interrelationship between Electricity, inertial Mass, and Gravitation which suggests
expansion may be a Linear-Transverse field illusion of sorts. Something to think about.
Mark, as always it's been a pleasure and please keep up the great writing/work. Sooner or later,
someone will connect the dots. Enjoy!
Best Regards
Mike
S-370. from Michael D'Agostino - misc. comments following receipt of backup-CD
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Wed, November 12, 2003 11:45 pm
Subject: Re: the CD is on its way !
Hi Mark,
Your CD arrived A-Ok. I haven't had time to go into any particular file in depth although I will say
you are covering some pretty exotic and abstract material here.
I've come to the conclusion (like they say in the state of Iowa - the "show-me state") that until
someone somewhere has a working prototype of a device that actually demonstrates something (ZPE,
etc.) under lab conditions and can be duplicated by other labs worldwide, that would be the
match/catalyst to starting a fire that could revolutionize and spread the World over.
In one of your papers on Hyperdimensions characteristic of the triangle, the triangle or trin is also a
function of the Spirals, Logarithmic, and others. A Vortex appearing on a 2-dimensional environment is
a spiral. Natural shapes (Pineapple, Pinecones, Sunflower, seashells, etc.) posses this characteristic.
Just as a spread-spectrum CDMA (code division multiple access ) utilizes a pseudo random code, I
assume Nature also uses codes. Another interesting quality is as randomness increases in the CDMA
system, efficiency also increases. In appearance, the function takes on the qualities of a Strange
Attractor. It can also be thought of as distribution.
I have to go over it again -- one of the files titled "Rotating fields". It seems interesting. I was aware
of the Caduceus Coil. According to Greek mythology, it was the Staff of Hermes given to Mercury.
According to legend, it functioned as both a Healing device and a Communication device to talk to the
gods. It later was adapted as the recognized symbol we know today as the Medical symbol.
Again, thanks for the CD.
Best Regards
Mike
522
S-371. from Thomas Skeggs regarding FTA progress
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sun, November 16, 2003 6:14 pm
Subject: Cardinal Point
Hello Mark,
All is going well to date.
I have been continuing work on the small prototype. Progress is slow because I have to make all the
parts fit within 1mm or the model may vibrate too much and shake itself to bits.
The Shadeworks workshop has gone tits-up for now. This didn't surprise me. I phoned the agent
leasing the site and he said he would me an info pack via e-mail. I didn't get them, so I phoned him. He
said the problem was at his end. He had brought engineers in to fix the computers and he will re-send it.
I never got it.
But the agent said the owner wanted to rent the whole site which had another building on it. It
would have cost about £15000 ($23,000) to rent each year. And that's not including the cost of
electricity, heating, water, etc.
The site is a shit hole and it's been smashed to bits by vandals. So I believed the owner would let it
out to any silly sod who's willing to pay to maintain it. But it looks like the owner has to high hopes for
the site (or some git is messing with my e-mail-in the Midlands of England!). So I still looking for
workshop space. I know I will find some.
I have just got some basic computer modeling software so I could re-test how the circuit layouts of
the new Cardinal point prototype works. And it does! I use to do it all out with pen&paper. Seeing it
work on a computer simulation is great! If the prototype actually produces enough thrust to lift itself off
the ground, I have to want and see.
The idea that some UFOs may function like 3-D circuit boards may be correct because the Cardinal
Point acts like a circuit board where the skin actually carries a charge and the upper section of it acts like
a capacitor. Like in Thomas Townsend Brown's design. (I also got this software to help me start
finishing off work on the "Firefox" system).
I'm currently working on a technical paper on how the capacitor discharge propulsion system works
with charts, diagrams, etc. I have added some new photos to the www.stargate-web.org.uk . The
graphics take the longest to do.
The UNITEL book has not arrived yet. But it can take up to 3-6 weeks by surface mail. I looking
forward to reading it.
So all is well. I'll keep you up to date.
Tom
523
S-372. from Andrew Potter regarding Transdimensions, Inc. of Huntsville, Alabama
From: "Andrew Potter" <potterae@email.uc.edu>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Wed, November 19, 2003 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: Transdimensions, Inc. / more info on its laser-based propulsion
>Andrew ->
>Found some more info on Transdimensions Inc. -- that Huntsville-based firm that is also
exploring propellant-less propulsion by laser like UNITEL.
>
>-- Mark
>>
>> From KeelyNet at http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m14772.html:
>>
>>The Biefield -Brown effect is quite simple: a charged capacitor exhibits motion in
the direction of its positive pole. Therefore it is not anti-gravity since it is not
actually interacting with the gravitational field. After all, you would not call a helium
balloon an anti-gravitational device since clearly there is no field repulsion. But in
the book Lost Science, the claim is made that the device is actually interacting with
the gravitational field (or more correctly with the space/time gravitational field).
>>
>>That got me to thinking if that is true, then there should be time anomalies
associated with the device since if it affects Gravity, it should also affect Time. I then
realized that since the gravitational effects are so small that any time-related effects
would also likely be to small to measure. So forget about time distortion or timetravel.
>>
>>Or maybe not. Nexus Magazine has an interesting article on anti-gravity at
http://www.nexusmagazine.com/Antigravity.html
>>
>>From the evidence given, it may be possible that the Bifield-Brown device (in the
form of Lifters) may have an effect on time after all. See below.
>>
>>Others may have a clue to the second or even a third force at work. Researcher
Fran De Aquino (professor of Physics at Maranhco State University in Sco Lums,
Brazil) has described in the literature that "bubbles of localized space-time" can exist
in variance to the surrounding fields.
>>
>>Anecdotal experience suggests that the lifters may be undergoing such space-time
anomalies.
>>
>>Tim Ventura has a heavy cast-iron bench vise on his work table. Intermittently, he
gets zapped by a charge when he touches the vise. But his experience is seemingly
out of time because he gets zapped before he turns on the machine. He also gets
zapped occasionally during a lift-off and can be jolted again days after turning off his
lifter.
>>
524
>>Further, he finds anomalous magnetic events in his garage. Firstly, the lifter does
not fly straight up. It goes back to the rear wall of his garage and is stopped and held
in place by the sheet-rock. What could be in the wall that attracts it? What could be
there that is not present elsewhere in the garage? Why not be attracted to a freelance
journalist standing adjacent?
>>
>> Secondly, Ventura finds he has intermittent and inexplicable magnetic fields up to
14 feet away from his lifter. These fields linger for up to 15 minutes after he switches
off the machine. Could all of these effects be part of a larger, more esoteric
phenomenon?
>>
>>Dr. De Aquino stated the following in an email to me: "If a particle absorbs or
emits electromagnetic energy (for example, photons), its gravitational mass (not
inertial mass) is changed. Gravity, as we know, is proportional to the gravitational
mass. Consequently, gravity is also altered." Could the lifter be levitating because it
weighs less, bathing in the glow of 30,000 volts and some kind of anomalous
magnetic field? Further, could it be levitating because gravitons are blocked in some
kind of gravity-shielding manner? Ventura believes this is possible and so do some at
NASA.
>>
>>The Hunt for Zero Point states that NASA sought the services of Dr Eugene
Podkletnov. However, while NASA's replication research languishes, the book
claims that researcher Ning Li, of Huntsville, Alabama is pursuing this line of
research as a private contractor to NASA.
>>
>>Another Huntsville operation (Transdimensional Technologies) is exploring these
multi-faceted phenomena. Its extensive website shows it to be a frequent contractor
to NASA, conducting research into "asymmetrical capacitive propulsion" and
capacitor-based devices to test "ion wind" forces. Jeff Cameron of Transdimensional
is said by Ventura to be "the father of the lifter", having developed the device while
exploring anomalous torsional effects of high-energy lasers. The lasers twisted and
broke the metal frames of unrelated test material, and at the time this was considered
a nuisance. But the unknown forces at work later led Cameron to found
Transdimensional; develop lifter technology to a commercial level; and subsequently
patent many pieces of related technology. Unfortunately, I have been unable to reach
Jeff Cameron or anyone at Transdimensional for any kind of confirmation.
>>
>>Regards, Trevor
Mark,
Thanks for the info. If you need any documents converted from PDF to Word or from Word to PDF,
just send them to me or give me the link and I can do it. I bought a copy of ScanSoft PDF Converter
and I have one of the latest copies of Word XP. Just to help out with your site.
As far as relating UFOs to our consciousness, I don't know. I think that approach will just confuse
us (UNITEL) more. Regards,
-Andrew
525
S-373. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding Corso's book
From : Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Sent : Sunday, November 30, 2003 8:55 PM
To : "Robert Sheaffer" <roberto@debunker.com>
CC : APOLLINAIR <APOLLINAIR@aol.com>
Subject : Re: Corso's Book a Hoax?
On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 05:02 PM, Robert Sheaffer wrote:
>Hello Jack,
>
>It looks like Brad Sparks' review of Corso isn't on-line any more (I'm pretty sure it used to
be). But I found another guy (Tom Mahood, who I don't know) reviewing it. And he also
makes some excellent points against Corso. See
http://www.ufomind.com/area51/list/1997/jun/a24-002.shtml . By the way, Sparks
remains firmly pro-Roswell. He just thinks that Corso's book was a hoax.
>
>best,
>Robert
I don't know. Paola Harris met him and thinks not. There was a second writer who I think Corso
wound up suing. The "hoax" parts were apparently put in by the other guy.
The weakest part of the book concerns the claims about alien technology transfer. But maybe that (
or at least the "spin") was planted by the ghostwriter. You know like "WMD in Iraq can launch against
U.S. in 45 minutes" for example? ;-) They had us all believing that for awhile. I believed it!
My opinion of Corso's book is based on a few key things he says that "ring true" to my intuition.
This is far from rigorous proof of any kind, of course.
1. Crew artificial AI fits my 1953 "experience" in http://stardrive.org/cartoon/spectra.html . That
really happened. Now what was really on the other end of the telephone I do not know.
2. Control of craft via brain waves.
3. Inside of ship is virtually "empty". No massive engines, no kitchens, no toilets. i.e., nano-tech &
stargate virtual instant transportation(perhaps to brane world next door across a small distance in
hyperspace?)
4. Time-Travel -- they come from the Future again. That fits what happened to me in 1953 when the
alleged ET AI said what would happen in 1973 when in fact I met Hal Puthoff et-al as part of the
CIA-funded SRI RV project as Saul-Paul tells it in my book Destiny Matrix. We even have a
90-minute tape of part of my meeting with Hal Puthoff, Russell Targ, Brendan O Regan et-al
arranged by Jacques Vallee who did not show up (curious!). My 1953 contact is discussed on
that tape. Jim Hurtak is also mentioned. All very odd no matter how you cut it. How I got there
is bizarre. It's all in Destiny Matrix.
526
5. My current physics consistent with Corso's "Big Picture" including recent trickle of new
communications with Hal Puthoff. ) i.e., the physics is in
http://qedcorp.com/APS/EmergentGravity.pdf -andhttp://qedcorp.com/APS/StarGate1.mov )
in the light of the amazing surprise of "dark energy" since ~ 1999 "The Right Stuff" to Make Star Trek
Real, IMHO.
S-374. from Dr. Jack Sarfatti regarding alleged ET-government back-engineering
From : sarfatti <sarfatti@mindspring.com>
Sent : Thursday, December 4, 2003 8:53 PM
To : victorgm@webtv.net (Victor Martinez)
CC : pzielins@ix.netcom.com (Paul Zielinski), Puthoff@aol.com, bill@skywatch-international.org,
scott6600@webtv.net, christenw27@cybertrails.com
Subject : Re: Zero-Point, or More? (personal)
I moved and canceled my current Pacbell account. It will be a month before it is moved to my new
location.
What are "Professor" Warwick's academic credentials in Physics? What physics degrees does he
hold? Where is he a professor of physics? BTW, a copy of my PhD in physics from Cornell is at
http://qedcorp.com/APS/ .
On Thursday, December 4, 2003, at 02:37 PM, Victor Martinez wrote:
>DR. SARFATTI:
>
>In the interest of balance and fairness, I forwarded on your e-mail to Professor Warwick for his
review and comments on your peer exchange/review of Dr Puthoff's writings.
>
>You commented on Professor Warwick's comments, so now he's commented on your comments!
Without saying either one of you is "right" or "wrong," I think he's suggesting that since you come
from the "white world" of science, that you're not as willing to think "outside the box" as someone
like Bob Lazar who reverse-engineered alien discs at Area S-4 for a while back in the late '80s at
Papoose Lake. Am I correct?
Lazar is a complete phony. Only ignoramuses take Lazar's Laputanisms seriously.
> Professor Warwick has expanded on his original comments and gives a scholarly presentation.
Read on! -The stuff below is cargo cult pseudo-science - not even wrong.
>>
>>From: Christen Warwick <christenw27@cybertrails.com>
>>Date: Thu Dec 4, 2003 12:54:09 PM US/Pacific
>>To: Victor Martinez <victorgm@webtv.net>
527
>>CC: Paul Zielinski <pzielins@ix.netcom.com>, Puthoff@aol.com, bill@skywatchinternational.org, scott6600@webtv.net
>>Subject: Re: Zero-Point, or More? (personal)
>>
>>UNCLASSIFIED/EXEMPT
>>Keyword: None
>>4 Dec 2003
>>SPECIAL/PLAINTEXT
>>
>>Victor asked Christen:
>>
>>Are you a "crackpot" and a "poseur?!"
>>Christen replied to Victor:
>>>
>>>My good fellow -- the answer is "No." I know that you are challenging in good faith,
sometimes just to see what I will write in reply :-)
>>>
>>>The problem is that "white world" physicists and engineers do not follow the known
paths to the answers.
>>>
>>>Allow me to clarify one of my statements:
>>>
>>>Original text:
>>>>Some UFO propulsion systems use high-VOLTAGE fields, which are specifically
resonated, phased and tuned to a planetary or interstellar field. This requires a powerful
energy source, such as zero-point.
>>>Revised, extended remarks:
>>>
>>>Some EM propulsion fields are high-voltage and ELECTROSTATIC in nature. These
fields CAN be resonated and phased to produce anti-gravitational effects. They don't
require an extremely high energy source. I refer the reader to the work of J.R.R. Searl, who
watched one or more of his test craft fly off into space at great speed before he could stop
them.
>>>
>>>There are thousands of references to J.R.R. Searl's work on the Internet. Below, I have
mentioned one of them.
>>>
>>>Excerpt from: http://antigravitypower.tripod.com/exper4.html
>>>
>>>Prof. John Searl is the ONLY man in history to have built and flown an antigravity
device called a LEVITY DISC, now called Inverse-G-Vehicle.
>>>
>>>This was recorded by the BBC News and by the Newspapers. The BBC ran a weekly
piece on Prof. Searl's work and progress for almost a year. These Television broadcasts
showed the Levity Disc in flight and gave updates on the work being done to build a large
craft.
>>>
>>>If a propulsion system utilizes gravitational amplifiers, it MAY require a high energy
source. (In the case of properly-designed free energy systems, this is not a major problem;
there is PLENTY of power.)
528
>>>
>>>Regarding propulsion systems utilizing Element-115, it has been written:
>>>>
>>>>The "Gravity A" wave emanates from the nucleus of Element 115 and actually
extends past the perimeter of the atom. The propulsion system of the disc amplifies and
focuses this Gravity A wave to cause space/time to bend, much like space/time bends in
the intense gravitational field of a black hole. The ability to direct gravity to cause
space/time distortions allows the disc to cross vast expanses of space/time without
traveling in a linear mode at a high rate of speed.
>>>>
>>>>Inside the reactor, the Element 115 is transmuted to Element 116 which is
unstable and immediately decays releasing antimatter. The antimatter is reacted with
gaseous matter which causes a total annihilation reaction, the 100 percent conversion of
matter to energy. The heat from this reaction is converted to electoral energy by a solid
state, near 100 percent efficient thermoelectric generator. It is this energy that is used to
amplify the "Gravity A" wave.
>>>
>>>I believe it was Dr. Sarfetti who commented:
>>>>>
>>>>>It is not physics as I know it and I have a Ph.D.
>>>
>>>Christen replied:
>>>>
>>>>Of course not! This isn't in the textbooks. This is ALIEN "Black World"
technology. It exists. Apparently, the Doctor has never been in the underground bases.
That may be just as well. This knowledge is 50-to-200 years ahead of what is taught in
the universities.
>>>
>>>Christen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Use of a Zero-Point Field not only provides a direct and indirect means of
propulsion, but it can also warp space-time to create an energy envelope around the
spacecraft, isolating it from the external universe and conventional laws of relativity
and physics.
>>>
>>>Apparently, Dr. Sarfetti commented:
>>>
>>>>>He is a crackpot.
>>>
>>>Christen remarked:
>>>
>>>It appears that the good Doctor is not familiar with the basics of UFO propulsion. At
least a gentleman of his stature was kind enough to REPLY, much to his credit. For his
courtesy, I will provide extended remarks. If the Doctor would observe the right-angled
turns of craft flying through the skies of Earth at high speed, able to traverse the Earth
atmosphere from horizon to horizon in 30 seconds, he might have a different opinion about
physics and propulsion capabilities.
>>>
529
>>>Although the following is the "earth-human" view of the subject, the good Doctor may
wish to review the research of T.E. Bearden concerning the nature and capabilities of scalar
fields. Dr. Bearden has a Ph.D. in Science, an M.S. in Nuclear Engineering, and a B.S. in
Mathematics.
>>>
>>>Welcome to "Alien-101." Standby for briefing.
>>>
>>>Excerpt from: http://www.cheniere.org/
>>>>
>>>>Unlimited clean energy from the vacuum.
>>>>No dependence on foreign oil from politically unstable areas.
>>>>No pollution.
>>>>No degradation of the biosphere.
>>>>No dependence on strategically vulnerable centralized power and distribution
systems.
>>>>No radioactive waste disposal problems.
>>>>
>>>>The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator (MEG)
>>>>
>>>>Has produced up to 100 times more power than was input, by extracting free
energy from the vacuum. The MEG has been independently constructed and its overunity performance independently replicated by other researchers. U.S .Patent awarded
March 26, 2002. Invented by Tom Bearden and 4 colleagues.
>>>>
>>>>[If you don't think it was hard to get a U.S. Patent on a "Free Energy Generator"
past the U.S. Patent Office, think again. It took a Special Master to confirm that the
thing actually works.]
>>>>
>>>More references for the good Doctor:
>>>
>>>Regarding Energy Density of the Vacuum
http://www.cheniere.org/references/energydensityofvacuum.htm
>>>
>>>Hitachi Engineers confirm Over-Unity Process
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/kawai.htm
>>>
>>>Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles
http://www.cheniere.org/books/efv/toc.htm
>>>
>>>Maxwell’s vector equations taught in university are... truncated equations
http://www.cheniere.org/references/maxwell.htm
>>>
>>>Correspondence regarding Grand Unified Field Theory
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/062503.htm
>>>
>>>Happy reading to all,
>>>
>>>Christen
>>>Currently residing on Sol III
530
>>>North American continent
S-375. from Thomas Skeggs regarding similar concepts to his 'Star Chamber'
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sun, December 14, 2003 7:00 am
Subject: Quantum Time Translation Machine
Hello -I've restarted work on the FTA on the Dec. 7. And I finished for 2 months on the Dec. 10.
Referring to my work on the 'Star Chamber' (which I have stopped for now), the nearest match
where scientists have done some research on is the "Quantum Time Travel Machine" postulated by
Yakir Aharonov at Tel Aviv University. The QTTM was written in papers as a "gedanken" experiment.
And because it works according to Quantum Theory, it has advantages over classical time machines
which only effect the time interval between events. (For example, Faraday Labs, St Peterburg's model.)
Aharonov's ideas also include the idea of using quantum mechanical balloons which are linked to
quantum particles. Some particles can exist in various states simultaneously until they are observed.
The 'Star Chambe'r design takes into account the "Parallel Worlds" interpretation. You don't have to
move a mass from 'A' to 'B' because the mass is already there. 'B' is in another parallel world moment.
We all live in our own worlds which appear to be observer-created. And what binds us together in one
physical "real" world is simultaneity which is a principle governed by Classical Physics.
I know that some will strongly objects to the design. But I'm aware of true reasons of why they
object my work.
I also forgot to mention that my "windows of opportunity" do not start on the day of Equinox or
Solstice. They can start a week-or -so before. I've been getting images and audio recently of some man
saying I'm a "Fantasy-prone personality" or some crap like that. I've been sensing something for a long
time now that something will happen on the Dec 18. The day after the 100 years of flight thing. It's not
a terrorist attack or something real bad. I just feel I need to keep my head for a while.
Well, all the best …
Tom
S-376. from Michael D'Agostino regarding ELFRAD signals at Phi Hertz
From : mangomike <mangomike@IJ.NET>
To : "Mark" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Sent : Tuesday, December 30, 2003 11:47 PM
Subject : ELFRAD signals at Phi Hertz
Mark,
531
Unusual signals received in the ELF-VLF radio frequency range. If I had to make an educated guess
on how-or -where superluminal communications is taking place, I start looking in the VLF-ELF to SLF
(super low frequencies) close to-or -around Zero Hertz. The only difference when searching would be
in the detection method.
Instead of detecting and decoding the standard linear-transverse E/M sine and carrier RF frequencies
in that range, shift receivers phase detection for high sensitivity to the nonlinear standing and or scalar
component of the wave. If antenna and receiver are redesigned to function with a extremely high SWR
(standing wave ratio; 100-to-1) and a reliable method of uni- and bi-phase detection was established in
addition to amplitude detection and measurement, we may discover signaling (and communications) are
already taking place.
Communications described above using only the near-field effect and pilot-phase and amplitude of a
standing (unidirectional) wave or the more exotic scalar (bi, tri, quad directional) wave would be instant
and superluminal in nature when using VL-ELF-SLF and would be undetected by conventional RF
(Linear, Transverse) RF receivers or test equipment since all E/M is enfolded to becomes a standing or
scalar component.
As long as both FTL Transceivers are within each other's footprint of one wavelength or less,
communications should be reliable and "instant". In order to ensure long range, it becomes frequencydependent. Lower frequencies = larger waves. When the wave is phased, pilot and carrier 180 o it
becomes a field. In this case, a standing field. The standing field behaves like an induction field. It will
not radiate beyond its designated wavelength.
Mark, there is much work required to fine-tune the details such as the variety of entropy adaptive
coding schemes which could be used in modulation formats better known as encoding-decoding. Subtle
changes would need to detected and measured in Phase and Amplitude.
I remember reading an article on the Neural-Phone. What caught my attention was the type of
modulation used. If I remember correctly, it was PCM (Pulse Coded Modulation).
Maybe through experimentation, different modulation methods may be tried. Except the wave
would be a field and the field would be a unidirectional standing field instead of standard RF-E/M with a
periodic value, giving it the characteristics of frequency. Zero Frequency = Infinite Space.
Thanks for the articles you sent. Happy New Years!
Mike
S-377. from Michael D'Agostino regarding physics theories
From : mangomike <mangomike@IJ.NET>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Sent : Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject : Re: more info on Jack's "telephone incident" ...
> From: Stealth Skater
> Mike ->
532
> Let me hasten to add that despite personality conflicts, we do need people like "Dr. Jack"
who are willing to put themselves on the line and face the bullets of ridicule. The challenge
is to bite out tongues and bare the brunt of their intolerances while we can extract something
useful out of them. It's probably more of an exercise in personnel management, perhaps
similar to the manager of a state-run agency whose policies only permit dismissal of tenured
employees in the most extreme cases. (How do you get them to work when you can't fire
them and can't give them tangible incentives like payraises?)
>
> I first came across Jack's UFO telephone incident when I was browsing his PowerPoint
presentation of the evolution of physics (http://www.stardrive.org/Lilly/sld001.htm ). The
telephone incident begins at http://www.stardrive.org/Lilly/sld026.htm . I converted the file
to a MS-Word document (http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Sarfatti_4.doc ) but left
out the telephone incident at the end. I thought it would cause readers to dismiss the whole
presentation. Indeed, at first I thought it was a joke in bad taste. But Jack has weaved it into
his posts at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SarfattiScienceSeminars and I'm sure at his home
site http://www.stardrive.org .
>
> If someone forced me for my estimate of the entire UFO phenomena, I would guess -- at
this point -- that the "new physics" that is so often referred to by secretive "insiders" is
something WAY BEYOND our most advanced stuff. Not only the theory but also the
materials science engineering. This would explain why demonstrations have been described
as "magic" by some, and would augment comments by Lockheed's Ben Rich and Canadian
radio engineer Wilbert Smith that this technology is "beyond anything the world's best minds
can even conceive of" and "unlike any subject I've ever been formally trained in".
>
>I would further venture that the reported ET/government back-engineering programs were
designed to retrofit selected parts of the ET technology into whatever of ours they could
adapt or "fit it" into. That's why the ETs were always in charge of these programs. They
themselves didn't know how something of theirs would work in our primitive vehicles. I still
feel the "ultimate" "magic"-like technology resides in cConsciousness engineering made
manifest through the use of psycho-reactive materials of construction. But that's not to say
we need to aim for the "ultimate" right now when selected adaptations would certainly equate
to a quantum jump in our technologies.
>
> Even though I was initially interested in UFOs and the Philadelphia Experiment, it has
been the stuff I learned from Tom Bearden (in the pursuit of these topics) that brought me to
possible medical applications by utilizing scalar waves a la Reich, Rife, Priore, etc. I almost
went to Med school (biomedical engineering after getting my Masters in chemical
engineering). But I was married at the time to my high-school sweetheart and I didn't want
her to be a secretary for 6 more years. Of course as my luck usually runs (I'm related to 'Al
Bundy'!), we're divorced now although we remain good friends.
>
> Till another time -> -- Mark
Hi Mark,
I have read the links below on Sarfatti`s incident and his position on Physics/MetaPhysics.
Considering the environment he's working in, it could very well have a negative effect on his credibility
within the larger scientific community.
533
I'm in no way implying these types of rarified events are not real. I just think it may be exercising
poor judgment in releasing this information to the Public domain.
Dr. Jack may be painting himself in a corner in regards to system information and consciousness. In
the many different theories of unification or 'Theory of Everything', that's usually where many drop the
ball. They will not typically factor in Consciousness into the equation. Separating 'Objective' from
'Subjective' is as difficult as separating the behavior of Relativity from "Spooky Action at a Distance" Quantum Physics.
So often do we forget that Natural Systems around us reveal themselves in a multitude of ways.
Only those who realize and properly "interpret/decode" the information around them will see this.
Tom. Bearden's work over the years has definitely influenced me. David Bohm's ideas on enfolding
and unfolding within higher orders of symmetry also play well in explaining lower ordering systems
embedded - enfolded within higher ordering systems.
Shape and Form = Function. The study of higher dimensional topologies fulfilling Mobius-type
transforms would be observed as Time, a periodic period, or frequency.
The principle problem I've always had with superstring theory is no Zero (0) in the system. A form
or variation of a Zero Transform must exist for transition in Time to occur.
Mark, some good books to check out are Quest for Zero Point and Tapping the Zero Point by Moray
B. King.
I've got to run. Talk to you soon.
Mike
S-378. from Tom Skeggs regarding ELFRAD signals at Phi Hertz
From : Thomas Skeggs
Sent : Thursday, January 1, 2004 7:50 AM
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: ELFRAD signals at Phi Hertz
Hello, Mark -Happy New Year and a belated Merry Christmas! I was away for Christmas.
I found some papers some time ago on superluminal electromagnetic fields that deal with
longitudinal waves. When reading them, it seems that EM longitudinal waves may be scalar.
I incorporated the data into my Star Chamber (SC) and FTA design with the use of a center dipole
waveguide. But someone from some forum took it completely out of context and discredited my ideas.
They claimed that no useful information can be propagated FTL. My designs involve enveloping the
device within a EM field of transverse and longitudinal waves. This isolates the object from the
surrounding space-time.
534
The papers -- all by William D. Walker -- were called:
(1) "Experimental Evidence of Near-Field Superluminally Propagating Electromagnetic Fields"
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0009023 (Summary)
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0009/0009023.pdf (Full-Text)
(2) "Analysis of Causality Issue in Near-Field Superluminally Propagating Electromagnetic and
Gravitational Fields"
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0009076 (Summary)
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0009/0009076.pdf (Full-Text)
(3) "Propagation Speed of Longitudinally Oscillating Gravitational and Electrical Fields"
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9706082 (Summary)
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9706/9706082.pdf (Full-Text)
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc?9706082 (June 27, 1997)
Remember I sent you an e-mail on time-travel about Aharonov's quantum time-translation
machine? The idea I have been trying to develop with the SC and FTA is that both are contained
within a bubble-shaped EM field. The SC tries to isolate the interior with a double-layered skin so
as to produce a barrier with negative energy density. This would completely isolate the interior from
the surrounding exterior space-time. When someone in it thinks of a place or time, the interior can
be made to match the place and time and the person should be sent there. That's the PSI remoteviewing component.
I also predict that any mass within the SC would act like a single quantum entity and not a
collection of quantum-sized atoms. The difference between the SC and FTA is the configuration of
the skin. The SC has its outer skin still exposed to the exterior space-time and will be still be
subjected to Classical laws. The interior layer of the skin will only subjected to Quantum laws.
Some have tried to discredit my work by claiming it violates this-or-that law. But the interior is
not subjected to Classical laws which are over-ruled by the Quantum laws like quantum gravity and
uncertainty. No laws are violated in the interior because the Classical laws do not apply within the
device. The skin in the SC acts as a transition zone between the exterior Classical world and
internal artificial Quantum world.
So a person in the SC can exist at (A) the same location at different times or (B) exist in 2
locations at different times. When the person makes an observation, then that person can appear at
the different time or location because it causes a partial collapse of the wave function. Also they are
teleporting into a Classical space-time where being in 2 places at once or different times is
forbidden.
I'm have been reexamining the particle-in-box equations again over Christmas to see how I can
incorporate that into my designs. I'm glad I got 2003 over with. It's been shit! I feel I'm getting back on
track. And I plan to really get things swinging in 2004!
I also have some news on wacky phone calls. I have written some it down. It happened in the
1970s. When I find it, I'll e-mail it to you.
All for now
Tom
535
S-379. from Tom Skeggs regarding his mysterious childhood phone-call
From : Thomas Skeggs
Sent : Thursday, January 1, 2004 12:58 PM
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : my strange childhood phone-call (maybe similar to Sarfatti"s???)
Hello again, Mark
Here's that strange story for you involving computer voices.
In the early 1970s when I was still quite young and living in East London, we had a phone call. My
mother took the call. And she just sat listening. Then she said to me that this must be a hoax call. She
then listened and said it sounded like a robot. She then let me listen. And it was a 'robot' voice (like
Stephen Hawking's electronic voice).
I recall the voice saying: "... your son will go on to do great things". It was more like listening to a
statement then a conservation.
My mother then put the phone down. Why did she believe it was a hoax? Because we had a series
of hoax calls which one really upset my mother. So we changed our phone number due to them. We
rarely talked about it. I don't think my parents will be able to recall the phone call now. The other time
we talked about this was over dinner the following weekend where I recall my brother and sister looking
puzzled because the phone said "your son will do great things". I think my sister wanted to know which
one. But I think they believed it was my older brother because he was at a private school.
Both my brother and sister have 12 O and A levels between then. I have no qualifications because I
did not sit the exams due to ill health -- not because I failed them. (I usually say "my brother went to
private school, my sister to grammar school, and I didn't go to any bloody school").
Also in the early 1970s, my brother was playing around with an electric motor and a disk. He
showed me something surprising when the disk and motor took off from the floor but the motor and disk
would tip over and crash into the floor. My brother asked me if I knew a way of stopping it from
crashing. My brother went to a private school where the other kids parents were professionals like
lawyers, writers, scientists, actors, etc. A friend at the school showed my brother the flying disk because
one of his relations was an engineer and they were doing some tests.
What brought all this back was that a few years ago, I was reading a book and in it an engineer
mentions the strange effects connected with spinning disks. In one experiment, one prototype took off
and flew across the lab and crashed causing damage to the wall. A young American scientist was
present. Who was working at the Atomic Energy facility at Harwell at the time? His name was Jack
Sarfatti!
I had completely forgotten about that robotic phone-call when my brother gave me a copy of the
Stargate Conspiracy. I'm unable to recall the year that phone call happened. I think it was sometime
between 1971-1974. I remember my brother was private school and the Apollo moon landings were on
TV. I think it may have happened in 1972-73.
If there is a real space faring time traveling computer out there, then it must have a sense of humor to
select someone like Jack. Because he has been told since he was child that he is great and gifted. And
he has developed a somewhat aggressive personality over the years. Then there may be me -- a man
536
who physically disabled and hasn't got a pot to piss in. And I think someone in New York who writes
on Jack's forum also claimed to have had a call in the early 1980s.
What do I think of this? 'To each generation', stuff. Or the phone call. I really don't know. I just
know it happened. But I cannot recall when it actually happened in the 1970s.
Tom
S-380. from Tom Skeggs regarding updating his papers on Biological and Magnetic Teleportation
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Mon, January 5, 2004 7:29 pm
Subject: Re: very interesting! -- your childhood "phonecall"
Hi Mark
I don't think sending a copy of my e-mail to Jack would be a good idea. I have e-mailed him twice
in the past and he has given 2 short and blunt answers basically telling to leave him along.
In fact, the first e-mail I ever made was sent was to Jack Sarfatti, asking him about if he had heard
anything from CIPA because I did not have their e-mail address in 2000. I sent them a 30-page
document on the FTA. This is also when I discovered that convincing people that the FTA works was
going to be an uphill struggle.
Jack may use the info thinking it may silence his critics. But to him, I'm a just person a person of no
importance because I do not hold a degree of any kind. He's more likely to claim that I'm an attention
seeker, trying to seek someone to endorse my work.
The phone call was strange and to me it did happen. I just don't know what it was all about. If it
was genuine, then I cannot understand its logic. If this "AI computer in the Future" is networking
scientists with non-scientific but savy engineers, inventors, designers, researchers, and computer
programmers, then the computer should have picked people who are bit more "user-friendly".
The 2 papers I have written -- "Biological Teleportation"
(http://stealthskater.com/Documents/Skeggs_05.doc ) and
"Magnetic Teleportation" (http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Skegss_06.doc ) need a weekor-two more for me to re-check the math. I was not happy with the Magnetic Teleportation document.
Sometimes it can take up 6 months for me to get a paper just right.
It took that long to write the "Tempus Codex" paper
(http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/StarChamber_05.doc ).
And I'm still not happy with it. (I hope to re-write and update it this year with info on the particle-in-abox maths and quantum time translations and paradoxes).
The errors in the "Biological Teleportation" paper that I sent you are the result of the paper being
scanned into my computer from a hard copy. This is how I back-up my files. If my computer gets
attacked by a virus, I can re-format the disk and re-scan the docs without the risk of re-installing a virus.
It just takes along time to do. And it can produce errors.
537
I will look at the original docs and let you know. Regarding the classical and quantum tunneling, I
have to go over my notes again. When I was writing up the UNITEL doc, I got out all of my textbooks.
I need some time because I have been busy working on the FTA airframe.
All for now.
Tom
S-381. from Tom Skeggs regarding "stealing" ideas from others
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sat, January 10, 2004 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: you & Jack may have more
Sorry I've been unable to reply. I've been ill since Wednesday. And I am finally getting back to
normal now.
The day after I said to you I had not got e-mail when joining Sarfatti's Science Seminars yGroup, I
got permission to join from the moderator. And I have been getting a digest for a few weeks now.
I have noticed that many people he named are mainly American or have moved to America. which is
puzzling to me. (He did mention J.Vallee). That may be due to Americans being more open about it
than in other countries where it's best to keep quite about something like that. Also many are
professional scientists and not just amateurs. Makes you think. If it was just a U.S intel op, then why
select foreign nationals? And how would they know what people will do in the far future? I don't think
intel services are that good.
"Agreeing to terms and conditions" mentioned by Jack regarding his phone-call does ring a bell with
respect to the one I received. But I cannot recall what they were or any other details, just that "agreeing"
was important. But my mother abruptly put the phone down. I think only in recent years things have
been changing slowly for the better.
During my recent illness last week. I had a bit of time to "sense" things out. I sensed that some
people want to create the idea that my FTA design will not work. They hope I will publish more-andmore work in the future. Then they believe they will get it all info on it for free. (This has happened in
the past and I see it happening to others. They dismiss people as cranks to try and force them into
proving them wrong.)
In Paris I sensed out that they require physical proof that my ideas on the FTA work. Not just
ideas/theories which just exist on paper -- anyone can do that!
So I have been just publishing only a summary of my work. I don't think I can do any more than that
because I have gone public with it. At the present time on-my-own, I have no chance of getting a patent
on the FTA.
I'll be in torch again soon.
Tom
538
S-382. from Robert Neil Boyd forwarding Holographic Cloning & Information Transfer
From: "Robert Neil Boyd" <rnboyd@mip.net>
To: "Jerry Dufour" <jerryhd@earthlink.net> (more)
Date: Sat, January 17, 2004 9:59 am
Subject: Fwd: Re: Holographic Cloning and Information Transfer...
------- Forwarded message ------>From: Robert Neil Boyd <rnboyd@mip.net>
>To: Louis <malklaka2012@softhome.net>
>Subject: Re: Holographic Cloning and Information Transfer...
>Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:53:23 -0500
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:03:27 -0500, Louis <malklaka2012@softhome.net> wrote:
>> Neil,
>>
>> Below is the e-mail to Iona that I mention to you. I welcome your comments.
>>
>> --Louis
>>
>> Iona,
>>
>> My research involving Gariaev's "DNA Phantom" effect has led me in an
interesting direction, and I wanted to get your feedback regarding an upcoming
series of experiments I intend to conduct. (Likely not until Spring of 2005:
proper planning prevents poor performance, after all! <G>)
>>
>> Considering Tszyan Kanchzhen's results with his 11-GHz EM version of
Gariaev's process, wherein he successfully expressed the holographic DNA
signature of a duck, then imposed it onto a hen, with the altered morphology
being passed along to the hen's offspring...I intend not only to verify his results,
but to determine:
>>
>> 1.) If the effect can be applied to "Holographic Cloning". i.e., While
Kanchzhen may have stopped his experiment as soon as visually identifiable
duck morphology began to appear in the hen ... how far COULD the process
have gone? Would it be possible to completely transform the hen -- not only
into "a" duck...but into THE exact SAME duck? (DNA assays of both animals
before, and the duck/hen after, would tell the tale.) If so, then "holographic
cloning" would be a reality, with results possibly far in excess of current cloning
modalities. Not only would genetic fading no longer be an issue, there would
be no need to wait for cloned animals to reach adulthood, as an adult of the
same species could be used as a "genetic blank".
>>
>> 2.) Could this effect be used to transfer information from one animal to the
next? We know from studies with rats that one rat can be trained in a specific
task, sacrificed, then fed to other un-trained rats, who then show statistically
significant improvement over control rats in that same task. Could this effect be
539
accomplished via Kanchzhen's effect, applied over less time to avoid expressing
the donor creature's morphology onto the target creature?
>>
>> 3.) Is it possible to extract a complete DNA sample from the hen before the
experiment, and then use this original DNA sample as the source material in
Kanchzhen's process to reverse the imposed duck morphology? A genetic "reset
button" of sorts.
>>
>> 4.) If point 3 is valid, then one could also extract DNA from a patient with a
genetic abnormality, re-sequence the DNA sample to eliminate the error, and
use this corrected DNA sample (via Kanchzhen's process) to correct the genetic
abnormality in the patient in-vivo.
>>
>> Needless to say, I have my work cut out for me. I am currently still in the
early planning stages of the above-mentioned experiments. I appreciate any
feedback you care to provide.
>>
>> Many Thanks,
>> --Louis
> This makes it clear. What has become clear is how the DNA factory is designed.
>
> There was a recent realization in the biological science community that DNA is not the originating
blueprint for physiology and behavioral patterns but that the DNA itself must be patterned after
something else. Something presently "beyond understanding".
>
> This results from the discovery that standard "evolutionary" processes are not capable of
accounting for very complex physical structures appearing in single-celled organisms in one
generation, with no "competition", or "survival>of the fittest" strategies involved in these very
complex expressions.
>
> For example, there is a one-celled creature which has developed an exceedingly complicated and
technically advanced rotary propeller propulsion system that converts proteins into electrical power,
which acts to provide power for an electric motor internal to the cell of the creature, which motor
powers the rotor-whip, allowing for increased motility of the organism in its environment. This
electric motor has bearings, armatures, and so on.
>
> There is no way this exceedingly complicated structure can be accounted for in the Darwinistic
paradigms. Eventually, it was realized that something external to the DNA must be patterning the
DNA. But what? And how?
>
> The DNA is the factory, the assembly line of the cell. So, WHO DESIGNED THE FACTORY?
>
> Well, we see some pretty darn strong evidence in the Gariaev results as to how the factory was
designed. And the "Who" is, of course, the "Cosmic Harmony".
>
> So it is clear to me that we have the answer to the actual origins of Life as arising from the
subquantum energetic domains. I think the sub-quantum is involved in this because the various
vector potentials ARE coherent mass-movements of sub-quantum particles.
>
540
> If you have Gariaev's email address, would you be so kind as to forward this commentary to him?
I've long ago lost his email address to virus attacks and various computer failures. And I think he
would be interested to hear some of this. And, he might give us some feed-back to fuel our own
fires.
>
> Thanks, Louis :)
> Neil
S-383. from Tim Ventura regarding limitations of science and observation
From : Tim Ventura <tventura6@comcast.net>
Sent : Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:37 AM
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : RE: the Life & Times of Jack Sarfatti
I would tend to agree with a lot of the quotes in the article about the other researchers. Interestingly,
I've been able to learn a lot more about these people than is generally known from some of the
comments. Unlike most people would have you believe, Lazar is damned smart. But that doesn't make
his story true. But if I were Edward Teller, I would have definitely considered him for the role that he
supposedly got hired for at Area 51!
With regard to the quote on Lazar "BS! Gravitons have never been accepted or proven … it's just a
hunch. I could go on-and-on. " -- the person that told you that is being a little obtuse (a physicist,
perhaps?) while again it doesn't go for or against Lazar's theory, gravitons are the defacto explanation
for gravity in Quantum Mechanics.
Tim's Note + Debate Resolver:
The accepted 'conventional' theory is Quantum Mechanics. And in QM, every force has a waveparticle duality. The force of gravity must be conveyed in Quantum Mechanics by a particle+wave that
has been arbitrarily named the "graviton". If it's conveyed by something else, then you aren't talking
about QM. This is a limitation of the model for it to remain internally consistent (ref: "phonon"). In
Quantum Mechanics, gravity must be considered to be a "force" because QM assumes a flat space-time
curvature.
Relativity theory overcomes the requirement for gravitons because the 'force' of gravity is seen as a
curvature of time/space rather than as a "force" in a pure sense. Unfortunately, Relativity theory has its
own Achilles heel in that that it considers Magnetism to be a force when in reality it is closer in
similarity to Gravity than to ElectroMagnetism. (Magnetism isn't a true force because it only affects
electric fields moving in relation to each other. In other words, without relative motion magnetic fields
mysteriously "disappear". Which means that it is a pseudo-force or a force resulting from an interaction
of other things.)
My slam against physicists is that they are too specialized to see outside of their own profession.
Perhaps if they studied philosophy or information theory, they would be more equipped as a profession
to realize that there are inherent limits to their methods and models which is why Physics keeps getting
overturned by newer theories. Physics is, unfortunately, a bit autistic as a profession. We accept that as
normal among computer programmers. But among scientists, the public sees this intellectual rigidity an
indicator of intelligence.
541
Here's a perfect example: The failure of string theory is that it predicts several forces that haven't
been seen. The Physics community has responded by stating that these "new forces" only work within
Planck-scale distances which is why we haven't seen them. Perhaps -- as a spoiler -- we haven't seen
them because we don't know what to look for and that in a few millennia we'll realize that they are largescale forces just like any other. Only they go unseen in the experiments that are conducted in our
current environment.
Best wishes!
Tim Ventura
http://www.americanantigravity.com
S-384. from Bill Hamilton regarding Bob Lazar and MJ-12
From : Bill Hamilton <skycom22@skywatch-research.org>
Sent : Sunday, January 18, 2004 12:24 PM
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: re Lazar
----- Original Message ----> From: Stealth Skater
> To: tventura6@comcast.net
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 4:55 AM
> Subject: re Lazar
> … As George Knapp said on video, although everyone that lived in Las Vegas heard
rumors about flying discs at Area-51, the national public never heard of Area-51 ... until Bob
Lazar. I in general believe what he is saying. Now that doesn't mean that all that is actually
true. I mean, they could have driven him to S-4 in a blacked-out van and said it was at the
Papoose dry lake bed. When in fact it could have been somewhere else altogether. The
gravity 'A' and 'B' theories he was taught could be wrong. But he's just reporting what he
was taught. That could have been dis-info to safeguard their butts in case he went public
(which he did). When Darlington commented that Lazar apparently had one of the better
work-weeks in history, actually Lazar spent 5 (6,7?) individual business days at the site in
person for a total of a week's "equivalent". Apparently the rest of the time must have been
spent off-site.
Not so. I have talked to witnesses who say that Lazar's depiction of S-4 is accurate in every detail.
Lazar did indeed spend little time on site.
> Why else would the Government so vigorously prosecute him over that brothel thing? The
presiding judge was surprised that the Feds were coming down on him harder than the actual
owner (madam) of the business. Another of the Groom Lake "Interceptors" along with Tom
Mahood was Mark Farmer ("Agent X" -- his nickname inspired Glenn Campbell to get
"PsychoRat"). Off-topic, he told Darlington he wanted to put a brothel somewhere near
Dreamland for the fly boys. Nevada is the only place where such things are legal in certain
locals. The French Foreign Legion has a traveling brothel at all times to prevent the soldiers
542
from causing havoc in the towns. The point is there is nothing anti-U.S. wrong with such
thoughts. The government appears to have used this as a "witch hunt" to silence Lazar.
Also, Lear swears to me that he has seen Lazar's diploma and a sample of E-115. He wasn't lying. I
know Lear too well. I have had other informers mention the Sport Model.
> In the Darlington's book, Tom recounted many theories of Lazar including those that he
was a deliberate dis-info plant by the government, making it very clever indeed along
counter-intel grounds. Tom seems to have done a reversal since the book -- maybe he's come
across some new material. But even his female remote-viewer friend located the 9 hangars in
the Papoose mountain side that Lazar described although they were empty now. (She later
"saw" a single disc at a DOE site Area-19.)
Disinfo claims are hard to prove. Which part of the info is disinfo? Unless you can specify exactly, the
claim is empty.
In short, I tend to believe what Lazar is reporting that he was taught by his superiors there.
That doesn't make it necessarily true, of course. He was relying on their instruments.
Element-115 could be Element-200 in reality; who knows. I think it's just because of his
defiant rebel attitude that he told all. (He probably didn't like guns waved at his head -- that
would make me go over the edge, myself!). Apparently the reactor power unit is the main
missing puzzle to the craft (nnot counting the rumored "artificial reality" and MQT
generating stuff in the upper level). For some reason, the reactor had to be in its 'running'
mode when the 3 scientists tried to cut it open. Bang! Despite Halerewicz's insistence that
"that's how a real physicist talks", I don't know why Teller would refuse to comment on
Lazar at all. More interesting, he said that he would not do so "on camera" which begs the
question did he tell the interviewer anything more while off-camera.
I have learned that is not like the MAJI to have workers disinformed. Maybe us - yes. But not those
they depend on to do reverse-engineering.
Bill H
S-385. from Bill Hamilton regarding Bob Lazar & Dan Burisch
From : Bill Hamilton <skycom22@skywatch-research.org>
Sent : Monday, January 19, 2004 11:59 AM
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: Lazar / Burisch
> From: Stealth Skater
> To: skycom22@skywatch-research.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 2:16 PM
> Subject: Lazar / Burisch
>
> Hi Bill ->
543
> You are quite aware of all the bad press Lear has brought down upon himself. For awhile
there, it was the Campbell vs. Lazar-Huff vs. Lear circus, with the sides frequently changing
positions. It left the audience bewildered in the end and probably had the effect of causing
none of them to be believed. (Some of that was funny in a sad sense, like Lazar going
overboard a la Sarfatti when he tossed dye marker into Lear's swimming pool for Lear tying
tin cans to his corvette [probably Huff's], and then Lear's wife retaliated by shooting out his
tires.)
I am aware of this. However, I know John Lear personally and know what he is like. He bowls me over
sometimes with his weird ideas and theories; but surprisingly when he talks "fact", the details are very
good.
> The person who should be investigated IMO is John Andrews. He claimed to have
introduced Lear to the UFO topic and then later introduced Lazar to Lear. I wish someone
would do a quality bio on him. That would be fascinating reading!
The now-deceased John Andrews is very interesting. But even more interesting is Ben Rich. Andrews
found out a lot from Rich on UFOs. Rich is the one I have recently focused on. His statements indicate
he had a lot of knowledge on the subject of reverse engineering alien technology.
> I don't know where "MAJI" would draw the line regarding sensitive information and the
need to mis-inform. I know that's done by the military on occasions and they in effect use
their own personnel for counter-intel purposes. Kind of clever. I've read Sherman's
understanding on how Above-Top-Secret projects are classified on a need-to-know
compartmentalization basis (http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/TopSecret_1.doc )
. It would seem to me that it would be easier to safeguard secrets if only the very top-level
administrative overseers would have access to ALL the information, and they would dispense
via the national security codes only on such need-to-know basis.
That may be the case. There is confusion in that some intermediaries massage the information in
accordance with their own involvement and beliefs.
> If I were overseeing such MAJI-related projects, I would make all researchers live in a
closed community for as long as they were working on the stuff. If they wanted to be with
their families, then they too would have to be part of that community with no contact with the
outside world. If they don't like the terms, then go find other research somewhere else -- take
it or leave it. If that was not feasible, then a way around those severe terms would be to
disguise and segment such research into parts such that they would be not connected with
any ET-related projects. Perhaps like they did on the Manhattan Project.
Good idea. But not always practical. Almost anything out of the ordinary draws attention. I think they
know this and make the best use of it.
> The only part of the Lazar Tri-Dot tape that aroused my suspicion was a segment where I
caught him trying hard to suppress a grin at the end of some long statement he made. I
shrugged it off then, but others (like Farmer) said he can't look them straight in-the-eye while
telling the stuff. I have no problem with his academic past. If he fooled the government,
more power to him. I heard he was basically fired from the contracting firm at Los Alamos
for spending too much work time on his own personal projects (like the jet car). I tried to
544
argue with Tom Mahood that the real issues here are not whether Lazar really was at suchand-such a place at such times, but rather did these events actually occur? I've used the same
argument with the government on Roswell when I ask them if any flying saucer type
recovery was performed within 1,000 miles from 1945-1950. They always reply I need to be
more specific. That gave me the answer I was looking for even it was through the "back
door". Tom uses the argument that if Bob lied about his educational credentials, then he lied
about everything. That just doesn't wash IMHO.
Here is the rub on the educational credentials. There is no record because that is arranged by the MAJI
ahead of time when they pay for the courses. If the CIA sent one of its operatives to a university for an
advanced degree, they will make sure there is no public or publicly-accessible record of that person so if
compromised, they can show he has no such degree or qualification. Since I work at UCLA I have
found out that students can even request their records to be private and any inquiry from the outside
as to the student status of a person will be responded to in the negative.
> Concerning the fascinating story about Dan Burisch, I can't believe his superiors would
allow him to be photographed with civilians (like you and B.J.) without severe reprisals.
That last instance with his wife saluting him in the car seemed awful "staged" to me. That
would never happen in real life. In war, commanders never are saluted by their underlings to
avoid identification. If I were MAJI and I saw the stuff he was spilling on his projects, he
would be quarrantined forever (or worse) and would never get a chance to write follow-up
correspondences over the succeeding months. I could be wrong, but this smells of deliberate
dis-info. But it's so fascinating that I continue to read each new "chapter". I heard that you
were going to write an article on him for NEXUS magazine.
Lots of misunderstanding here about this case. Wife's salute was not "military". It was a ritual that Dan
and Deb perform. The meetings with him are pre-arranged. Someone wanted him to talk. As for the
validity of the information - that requires a lot of analysis and many more questions. Some makes sense,
some doesn't. The article for NEXUS was published last year. B.J. is now working for "them". Very
strange - the whole case.
> I'm going to forward you 2 e-mails from a "Robert Neil Boyd" who posts on the
Greenglow
list.
I
archived
one
of
his
posts
at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Boyd_01.doc . His UFO sighting reminded me
of UNITEL's (http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/UNITEL_8.doc ) in that it
appears to have been deliberately done. Don't know what to make of this guy. The last email featured a correspondence with Iona Miller (who frequently writes on NEXUS); it has a
new "slant" on DNA. It's over my head, though.
I am on the Greenglow list and have exchanged emails with Neil.
>
The
kind
of
Physics
I'm
familiar
with
can
be
seen
at
http://www.stealthskater.com/Nuke.htm . I minored in nuclear engineering in college.
This quantum foam/superstring/many-sheeted DNA consciousness stuff is beyond my
understanding although it is fascinating to know such concepts exist. Now I see where
Hollywood scriptwriters get their stuff from (and I've long wondered if those guys aren't
government scientists on-the-side trying to secretly "indoctrinate" the public as Marshall
Barnes once told me).
545
Theories in Physics are multiplying like rabbits. Few survive. I majored in Physics for a while but did
not complete. I was interested in engineering physics.
-- Bill
S-386. from Tim Ventura regarding anti-gravity research
From: tventura6@comcast.net
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Tue, January 20, 2004 4:25 pm
Subject: re: Tom Skeggs and his FTA / Star Chamber proposals
Hi Mark -I've read a bit about the Floyd Sweet's FTA if that's what you are talking about. I remember that it's
interesting. But I couldn't find enough on it at the time to really develop an opinion. I'm not sure if
Skeggs' work is similar or not, though ...
Some of the projects that I am "scheduled" to participate in are waiting for funding. So I have been
stuck on the Government stuff pending further notice. One of these might tie into anti-gravity
technology. But I don't know enough yet to tell one way or the other how it's even supposed to work.
Marcus has been claiming that he's going to reveal further results to the public soon. But I don't
have any firm date for new data from him. As things are, it's interesting to hear about his improvements
which seem very logical based on where he was starting from.
It's interesting to note that most of the people that were doing a LOT of work in this technology even
12 months ago are now almost silent. My inbox has been nearly empty lately. And it's not simply the
result of my being back at the office working days.
I think that the AG stuff has natural ups and downs. We're probably in a down-cycle as the economy
picks back up and people get back to work. That's OK but nonetheless a little depressing because we
were making so much progress with the AG research.
I would definitely check out extensions to General Relativity theory for new leads on Gravity. I
suspect that Einstein laid more of the groundwork than anybody suspected because the rotating
magnetic field ideas tie into his conceptual framework for Gravity very nicely.
Thanks,
Tim Ventura
S-387. from Bill Hamilton regarding above-top-secret research
From: "Bill Hamilton" <skycom22@skywatch-research.org>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Wed, January 21, 2004 4:25 pm
Subject: Re: Lazar / gravity theories / Tom Skeggs
546
In TS/SCI projects, one can work on classified material yet know nothing or hear nothing about the
UFO projects. I had a TS/Crypto clearance in the USAF and yet saw no classified data on UFOs. That
doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
As for Area 51, let me quote from an article I just wrote for the MUFON Journal...
"The February 1987 issue of Gung-Ho magazine had a very interesting article
discussing projects called "Unfunded Opportunities" (UFO). It said that these programs
were dealing with technology levels so advanced that one Air Force officer involved in
SR-71 development said: "We are flight testing vehicles that defy description. To
compare them conceptually to the SR-71 would be like comparing Leonardo da Vinci's
parachute design to the space shuttle."
"We have things that are so far beyond the comprehension of the average aviation
authority as to be really alien to our way of thinking," says one retired colonel. Rumor
has it some of these systems involve force-field technology, gravity-drive systems, and
"flying saucer" designs. Rumor further has it that these designs are not necessarily of
Earth human origin. "Lets just put it this way," explained one retired Lockheed engineer,
"We have things flying around in the Nevada desert that would make George Lucas
drool."
Keep looking,
Bill
S-388. from Bill Hamilton regarding above-top-secret research
From: "Bill Hamilton" <skycom22@skywatch-research.org>
Date: Thu, January 22, 2004 2:37 pm
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Subject: Re: the "oldies" may be the best "goodies"
On January 22, 2004 you wrote:
> Yeah, I've always been in the "camp" of you and others. Historical evidence is on our side.
Too many reputable people to dispute, and many of these were in the olden days of no
"digital effects".
>
> What is perplexing is why UFOs seem to reveal themselves to select people. I'm almost
100% convinced of that. That would apply to Sarfatti, Maurer, and even Skeggs (though he
just mentions frequent periods of missing time, never a UFO). Plus they seem to "anticipate"
actions of people BEFORE they actually do it.
They revealed themselves to me in 1957. I had almost continuous sightings from1957-1960 and some
interaction.
> Whatever their agenda, it doesn't appear to have influenced the ordinary person's life to any
great degree. Now, sure, maybe they are intercepting other ET races from invading our
547
planet or setting up EM shields to thwart Solar wind, etc. If they are doing such things and
keeping it "quiet", keep up the good work, fellows! -- just don't tell me about it.
BTW, I have my own theory. But I prefer experiment and engineering. I have one premise to my
theory: Space is a perfect fluid.
> Didn't Jim Goodall make the quote you referenced below ("retired Lockheed engineer)? I
think it was from a Hesseman video "Secrets of the Black World". I saw it on a trailer from a
UFO documentary I rented at Blockbuster.
I think you're right -- it was Goodall. BTW, I appear in that video as well.
> Some skeptics have claimed that it would be impossible to keep secret UFO projects for
decades with all the leaks in Washington. But I recently saw a PBS show on WWII antiaircraft shells that were fitted with a radar proximity fuze. This was never done before. And
the narrator said that more than anything else, this top-secret device saved our naval vessels
from more damage by the kamikaze suicide dive-bombers. The fuze was built using the
vacuum tubes technology of the day. I think it had 20+ parts; and an interviewee said if all
the parts were manufactured to 99& accuracy, the resulting shell had only a 4% probability
of success. (The point was that -- from basic statistics -- the more parts, the more the
precision must be exercised to make the completed shell 95+% reliable.) Its existence was
kept secret until recently. If they can do that with such a "simple" thing as that, think what
they could do with UFOs! (What amazes me more about that shell was even with vacuum
tubes, it could survive the 10,000-G firing of an artillery gun. I remember reading a ~1980
AW&ST issue that solicited proposals to make the Copperhead -- laser homing -- shell
withstand 10,000-G's of force. And this was using solid-state technology which one would
think is a lot more robust than vacuum-tubes. They're reinventing the wheel here! They
didn't learn from yesterday's engineers. I doubt they could build a Saturn V today. Research
into firing AIMs held inside a fighter going supersonic has already been done in the 60's
Delta-Dart, Delta -Dagger, etc. They shouldn't have to repeat it for the F-22. But that's what
they're doing!)
Keep looking,
Bill
S-389. from Tom Skeggs regarding recent FTA progress
From: "Thomas Skeggs" <tomskeggs@tiscali.co.uk>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Thu, January 22, 2004 7:34 pm
Subject: Re: your files archived as MS-Word docs
Hello Mark,
The 'Cardinal Point's are 23 cm in diameter or 230 mm. The overall FTA size is about 2.7m x 2.7m
x 1.6m. (The height maybe shorter in the final model - I did some more re-design work and it requires a
more flatter model). I'm going to update the FTA website and check again for typing errors over the
weekend.
548
The inverter is a 12VDC/240VAC inverter with a quasi-sine wave inverter. I have discovered to
great expense that a true sine wave is vital when using sensitive electronic equipment like computers. I
have blown the computer power supply and damaged the motherboard. It's also blown out the servo
controller and input/output board so I'm having to replace it. That has proven to be a major setback
because I had just finished building the computer and got it running smoothly. (Standard "quasi-" sine
or square wave are okay to power 240VAC lighting, radios, or even game machines. But computer
controlled equipment -- I now know! -- requires a true sine wave of around 40-60hz because I think the
computers need it for timing purposes).
As for running various phases [in the basic construction plan] in parallel, that's not going to be easy.
Currently I'm making a Phase I prototype. So I'm working on the airframe, the computer system, and
reading some over 200 pages on a new input/output board. Plus I'm working on interfacing a GPS
system with the computer. I've already tested a handheld Garmin GPS-12 receiver with a computer
software program. But I'm having problems with the OCX drivers. I've also got a new PCB design
program because I need to construct interface boards between the sensors and the input/output board.
I hired a company to make up some parts for the 'Cardinal Point's. But they kept putting the
completion dates back. So I cancelled the order. One excuse they gave me was that they forgot about
my order?! So I'm having to do about 90% of the work myself.
I have also found time to work on the airframe and in the process of making up 6 mounting brackets.
I've already made 3. And I hope to complete work on the lower section of the FTA by March. That is
the most complex part.
So running different phases in parallel will be real troublesome. I've tried it in the past. I ended up
doing a lot but I get nowhere because I produce parts for different prototypes. So I have to focus on one
prototype at-a-time. When I get it to work, I can show to other companies and they may help me build
the others in parallel. But I need to prove that my design works. That's why I'm committed to
completing the Phase I prototype.
I actually did make a request to an American research & development company called Nine Sigma
based in Ohio. But I'm delayed submitting a proposal now because I wanted to complete work on the
prototype first. So I have something physical to demonstrate instead just a theory.
They are many other events in progress and other components under construction. But for security
reasons, I'm having to keep them confidential for now. I'll let you know how it goes …
All the best
Tom
S-390. from Michael D'Agostino regarding Bob Beckwith
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Thu, January 29, 2004 12:02 am
Subject: Re: more on 'Bob Beckwith' ...
> Hi Mike -549
>
>I first gleaned info about 'Bob Beckwith' in the interview by Chica Bruce in her book
(http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Chica_1.doc ).
>
>But I found more "missing pieces" at a GeoCities "Shadowland" site which contained an
entire chapter excerpt from Beckwith's book. I located his major electrical company and
appended his background, experience, and LOTS of patents to the book excerpt at =>
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Beckwith_01.doc .
>
>I don't know if he himself has ESP/RV-type abilities without reading his entire book. But
he seemed to infer that such "gifted" individuals can make use of advanced technologies
without excessive power requirements.
>
> Later -> -- Mark
Hello Mark,
When I met Robert "Bob" Beckwith in either 1998 or possibly 1999, it was at a MUFON (Mutual
UFO Network) meeting. A friend who was a member invited me. Over a period of 2 years, I must of
attended 3-or-4 meetings and as a result met some people with very interesting stories. From the typical
UFO abduction people to the very mystic/spiritual types and others claiming to hear a continuous
humming noise.
He (Bob) looked to be in his mid- to late-70s at the time. Bob seemed very stand-fast and solid
regarding his theories or how he felt things really are. In his paper Hypotheses, Bob is very descriptive
when explaining the Roswell crash material. Very thin layers of Magnesium/Zinc and alternating layers
of Bismuth. Bismuth is probably one of Nature's most nonconductive materials and makes a great
dielectric. I believe Magnesium/Zinc is a conductive material. I also believe when Bob mentions the
"Super Atom", he may be describing a negative energy state or condition. Likewise what he calls a
"neutrino" may very well represent scalar fields, Zero Point Vectors.
On the bottom half of page 82 in Hypotheses, Bob describes "globes" which hold relatively highfrequency in a bubble of inner space. Mark, when a linear sine wave folds back on itself, it becomes a
standing wave - Non Linear. This standing wave -- especially if experiencing phase -- could in theory
be very stable. What Bob describes as a "globe" could very well be a form or variation of a highvoltage, high-frequency standing wave or scalar wave, non-linear.
I wish I could tell you more about Robert Beckwith. But my contact with him was short and the
scalar wave 'word' sent him off in another direction when I did talk to him. When somebody overreacts,
it's almost like a type of conditioned response. I wonder if there's anything else involved with Bob's
history and scalar waves ???
Have a good one
Mike
S-391. from Simon Raschle regarding challenging the status quo
550
From : Simon Raschle <sraschle@hotmail.com>
Sent : Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:16 AM
To : stealthskaters@hotmail.com
Subject : RE: the Life & Times of Jack Sarfatti
Dear Mark,
Thank you for the email. Sorry for the late reply. My system was down due to hard drive troubles.
I also want to thank you for challenging conventional wisdom. It's the only way we are going to
progress technologically and socially. While I have my reservations regarding some of the theories of
people such as Mr Sarfatti, I do consider them to be valuable. If we have enough people challenging
what is and what could be, eventually we make the necessary breakthrough. And that isn't theory -- it's
mathematics.
Regards,
Simon
S-392. from Michael D'Agostino regarding "Multiplexed Time"
From : mangomike <mangomike@IJ.NET>
Sent : Wednesday, January 28, 2004 7:39 PM
To : "Mark" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Subject : Re: Robert Beckwith and Hypotheses
Hi Mark,
I met Bob Beckwith back in 1998 or 1999. If I remember correctly, he lives in Clearwater, Florida,
a 30-minute drive from my location here in Madeira Beach. I remember I found him extremely
interesting regarding the fundamentals of E/M and the manipulation of waves for RF (Radio Frequency)
communications. It was a MUFON meeting where I met him it.
I remember we talked for about 15 to 20 minutes, then when I brought up 'Scalar Waves', he
suddenly changed his composure, attitude, and tone. He suddenly became very disinterested in the
conversation and wondered off in another direction. I think his remark was there are no such things.
I found the shift in his behavior rather sudden and strange. I did receive a copy of his publication
Hypotheses. After reading it, my feeling is we were talking about the same things and it was a
translation problem in the language alone and some of the concepts.
Beckwith`s work Hypotheses did and still does influence my work today although my views and
language are different. Col. Tom Bearden, Tesla, Keely, Bohm and several other pioneers have also
played a major role in some of my present and evolving theories of "All That Is".
In a similar fashion to Beckwith`s Divided Space, I suspect there may very well be a type of
"Multiplexed Time". Nature Multiplexing Time would make it possible to codify a time-line which can
easily be convoluted together making it possible to have multiple state spaces in the same space
experiencing time in different sequences. A crude but somewhat similar method can be compared to
how some cell phones work like Nextel. TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) provides a means for
551
multiple users to occupying a narrow patch of frequencies which just sounds like noise to the casual
listener. Yet each user has their own and unique communications path.
Mark, have you seen video of those "Rods" which only appear when slowing the video, which
usually runs 30 frames a second? They are small insect-sized "rods" which seem to be attracted to
different areas.
I`ve got to run. Talk to you soon.
Best Regards
Mike
S-393. from Tom Skeggs regarding virtual e-p pairs producing propulsion
From: "Thomas Skeggs"
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Thu, January 29, 2004 7:57 pm
Subject: Re: "MangoMike" actually met Beckwith ...
Hello Mark -I've been busy recently. But the bad weather in the UK means it's too cold to work outdoors. So
work has just stopped on the FTA. I've been using the time carrying out some "brain-storming" sessions
and just using visualization to work out the technical problems I've been experiencing. I usually go for
long walks.
"MangoMike" is right to think Magnesium/Zinc is a conductive material. I was only thinking about
it today, trying to come up with a final design for the FTA skin composition. It's common knowledge in
electrochemistry. If you put some types of metals together, they produce a potential difference between
them. It's known as the Electrochemical Series.
For example: Magnesium/Zinc, Aluminum/Copper, or Aluminum/Zinc.
The potential difference is small for Magnesium -- it's -2.35 volts. Zinc is -0.76 volts. The potential
difference is the result of the emission of ions. But these figures are used based on when the metals emit
ions in an aqueous solution. But it appears some metals are better at producing positive ions and others
are good producing negative ions.
Also I came across notes I wrote on a British UFO case which many UFO researchers dubbed as a
hoax. Yet this case involved the discovery of a small disk-shaped craft about 2-ft in diameter. A British
engineer managed to find it and analyze it. The skin consisted of two copper layers with a plastic based
cement between the two filled with a iron powder. The outer layer was thicker than the inner layer. The
interior contained no moving parts -- just a central Copper tube running from top-to-bottom with a
copper pipe spiraled around it. Analysis of the Copper showed it to be of high purity and appeared to be
made out of a single Copper crystal! The exterior was coated with a white plastic based material.
The engineer was puzzled by its construction. If it was a hoax, someone went to great lengths to
make it. The engineer also described a novel way on how it may work. He believes the virtual e-p pairs
which exist at the microscopic level of space may be forced to become real when you apply a very high
voltage potential across the two metal plates. [But it maybe as high as 1 million electron-volts]. The
552
electrons would be pulled towards one plate and the positrons towards the other. The curved shaping of
the plates plus the unequal thickness may result in the production of a strong force, resulting in
propulsion. I have been searching my notes to see what this force was. To see if it's gravitational or
electrical or both.
I have also been going over my notes on simple harmonic motion. I'll get back to you on this in the
future.
Tom
S-394. from Michael D'Agostino regarding more reflections on Bob Beckwith
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sun, February 1, 2004 1:54 am
Subject: Re: more on 'Bob Beckwith' ...
Hi Mark,
Regarding Beckwith, in his publication Hypotheses across from page 96 are clear photocopies of his
US Navy ID. Beckwith supposedly worked as a government contractor through General Electric. I find
him credible from a brief surface-brush encounter with him.
I have several good friends which are either active or retired US Gov`t/DOD. One of my retired
friends also went through the Navy was sheep-dipped to continue his work as a SIGNINT/COMINT
engineer for "No Such Agency" (NSA) and then US Government contract division - General Electric.
He also had a chance to work on the program team which was under Lockheed Martin-Gov`t contracts Satellite division. Blue-Green submarine laser communications system.
They had some bugs to work out of the system. They kept receiving some kind of interference,
noise at depth. The sonar man listened and determined the noise to be Bio-Noise from a living creature.
They later sent in a research team which determined it was bio organisims and sea life which glow at
similar blue-green optical frequencies. A certain portion of the blue-green optical/light spectrum has
good deep water penetration and provides a secure data link for short digital messages via satellites.
Nature beat us to it again. The sea life already is using the optimal light spectrum for mid range
communications.
Hypotheses, Page 10, Chapter 1:
Summary/Discussion: For years, electrical engineers have worked in an orthogonal sixdimensional space. By "orthogonal" we mean that all dimensions go from negative to
positive infinity with a right-hand relation between any two dimensions. By right-hand
relation, we mean that a curve can be drawn between any two dimensions on a piece of
paper with the dimensions running along two lines at right angels to each other. A
major purpose of Hypotheses is to develop many explanations of "Paranormal"
phenomena using the three dimension of space, a fourth of time, a fifth of voltage
gradient and a sixth of magnetic fields.
553
I have read about Beckwith's ideas of the Universal Space and Divided Spaces. In a manner of
speaking, I agree. If Super Space, Universal Space, Hyper Construct Space or Scalar Space of Zero
Time, Zero Space a "Ether" of sorts exists -- then Yes. This would make all State Spaces or divided
spaces subconstructs and byproducts of the Ether, Super Space, Universal Space have also been called
"Gap Space". This would play into a version or variation of the 'Many Worlds' scenario in which case
an infinite number of realities or state spaces exist at once simultaneously occupying the same space but
all following a different spatial and temporal coding. This would suggest the sum total of all other
realities at once occurring creates what we measure as DC, Static, Noise, Quantum Flux a Non-Linear
Medium.
Beckwith also discusses neutrinos (usually described as a ghost-like particle in many science
articles). I've also discovered some Internet websites describing neutrinos as the counterpart to Scalar
fields in particle form. Maybe the sum total of all Higgs particles distributed within the Manifold in all
phased states/superposition states = the sum total of all neutrino activity within the construct of the
Manifold. And as observed from our finite system detect only the Linear Phased elements of this event
in local perceived - measured space-time. Orthorotation of fractalized Inter Dimensional systems are
most likely dependent on Harmonic Cascading Events. Harmonics can be Linear , Nonlinear, or
combinations of.
Mark, short on time. Got to run. Excuse the typos …
Best Regards
Mike
S-395. from Michael D'Agostino regarding 'rods'
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sun, February 1, 2004 2:47 am
Subject: Re: "rods"
kram@stealthskater.com wrote:
> Hi Mike ->
>
I didn't mean to ignore your question concerning "rods". Never paid too much attention
to them. I read about them at Art Bell and Rense.com. I must be missing something here
because Bob King (New Zealand-based, bobking@xtra.co.nz ) asked me the same thing
some months ago. Bob is a WWII veteran who claims that teleportation was the real reason
behind the P-X (see http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/BobKing_1.doc ; you
should have it on the CD).
>
>
I always thought they were a curious visual anomaly, nothing like "creatures" from
another dimension or morphing UFOs. But feel free to correct me if I'm wrong -- in your
opinion -- and I should investigate the topic closer. There have been times when I've seen to
catch a fleeting glimpse of something out of the corner of my eye, but I've blamed it on
middle-age and "floaters" in my near-sighted eyes.
>
> Talk to you later -554
> -- Mark
Hi Mark,
This may seem like coming from "left field". But through careful consideration, I believe and reason
just as 'rods' are never seen by the naked eye but only captured when slowing down video. Video
generally runs about 30 frames-a-second. If the video is played at normal speed a person will not
usually spot them (i.e., the 'rods'). But when slowed to 5-10 frames-or-less the 'rods' appear.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but out of the tens of thousands videos shot of UFOs aren't at least 5-10%
of them spotted only after playing back their video tapes and noticing a object they didn't see while they
shot the video -- or a blur -- and when slowed frame-by-frame only then does an object or craft appear?
But when played at normal speed the phenomena doesn't appear.
What I'm getting at is maybe if we had the ability to sample audio, video i.e., at rates of 100th of-asecond or greater and by shifting either up-or-down the optical-RF spectrum, we can determine that
there's more going on then meets the eye. Maybe Nature has already found a method of Temporal
Multiplexing allowing multiple spatial substructs to occupy the same Spatial Frame through Temporal
Multiplexing or Coding. Just as computers have clocks, so to all biological life.
Maybe Natural Systems can attain maximum efficiency through adaptive entropy codification
continually exhibiting emergent properties within a golden mean based harmonic cascading ratio of
spatial and temporal environments contained within a Manifold of Hypro- and Hyper-Zero Continuum
to perpetuate emergent properties.
Have a good one.
Mike
S-396. from Bob King regarding a 'rods' video
From : Bob <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Sent : Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:44 PM
Subject : Re: "rods"
Hi
> Mark, have you seen video of those "Rods" which only appear when slowing the video
which usually runs 30 frames-a-second? T hey are small insect-sized "rods" which seem to
be attracted to different areas.
I have seen more than one video on this subject and I don't believe they are faked because many
come off of amateur videos and they didn't even know they were there until analyzed. They have made
specific attempts to film them professionally as well and they show the same things when slowed down.
No one seems to know what they are but speculation is that they could be a lifeform we didn't know
existed or they could be as suggested a time frame warp which only shows when the time frame is
changed, They are not all small either, some have been measured up to 4 feet long.
555
Regards, Bob
S-397. from Bob King regarding copying a 'rods' VHS tape
From: "Bob" <bobking@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Sun, February 1, 2004 2:26 am
To: "kram@stealthskater.com" <kram@stealthskater.com>
Subject: Rods
Hi
I have just checked with my flatmate and it appears she made a tape of the 'Rods' program(s). It may
take some time to find it and copy it so don't hold your breath; but will see what we can find. Our
videos are in 'VHF'. I think yours are in a different format. Please let me know what it's called as I may
have to get the job done commercially for you. If there is room on the tape, I will also put on the
program they did in "Infinite Colours" etc. which you will find fascinating and very relevant to some of
the science you are interested in.
Regards, Bob
S-398. from Michael D'Agostino regarding a 'rods' video
From : mangomike <mangomike@IJ.NET>
To : "Stealth Skater" <stealthskaters@hotmail.com>
Sent : Monday, February 2, 2004 11:24 PM
Subject : Re: Re: "rods" from Bob King
Mark,
Thanks for the info it may be very useful. Over the years I've -- as yourself -- have seen alot of TV
and documentaries on the subject of UFOs. I have personally witnessed two aerial events, phenomena,
that fall into the UFO classification.
Regarding the 'rods' and some UFO sightings captured on video only (i.e., not seen visually), in both
cases only when the film is analyzed frame-by-frame do we spot something. In most cases it's
something very unusual. It may also be a clue to how Time or Temporal fields operate. It would also
answer the question; "How many angels can fit on the head of a pin?" answer: an Infinite number. This
may also lead itself to the question concerning the 'Many Worlds' theory: how can you have an infinite
number of reality-systems/alternate-realities occupying the same space or spatial area?
Rods and Video -- Only UFOs -- when analyzing the footage frame-by-frame -- does the object of
interest just appear for a few or several frames? Or is it "smeared" over a large number of frames? Also
is it possible -- or even worthwhile -- for a spectral analysis of the footage in the hopes of discovering
more data?
556
This could possibly shape the way most of us think about Space and Time Reference Frames. My
guess is Nature has probably already figured out the most effective and efficient means of ordering
reality systems and the domains in between.
Finding and recognizing the correlations in different areas of observation is important. How all of
this relates to the big picture is really anybodies guess.
Thanks for the news of Element-115. I guess another look at Lazar is in order.
Best Regards
Mike
S-399. from Michael D'Agostino regarding Standing and Scalar waves
From: "mangomike@IJ.NET" <mangomike1@yahoo.com>
To: kram@stealthskater.com
Date: Sat, February 7, 2004 10:21 am
Subject: Re: a search on Farday's field theory ...
kram@stealthskater.com wrote:
> Hi Mike ->
> In an effort to understand modern field theory, I did a Google search on Faraday. I'm not
sure if it helped my visualization of "fields", but that man surely was fascinating. Both
Einstein and Maxwell cited him as being a forerunner of their works. And he was plagued
with illnesses and the son of a blacksmith to boot. Among many things, the electric motor
was credited to him.
>
> I wished school textbooks would have included more of the personal history of great
scientists in addition to the formulae they discovered. That's why I enjoyed reading Kaku's
Hyperspace so well. He let me "see" inside the minds of the different researchers.
>
> Some of the good <link>s on Faraday follow:
>
> http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi905.htm
> http://www.woodrow.org/teachers/chemistry/institutes/1992/Faraday.html
> http://www.phy.hr/~dpaar/fizicari/xfaraday.html
> http://www.rigb.org/heritage/faradaypage.html
> http://www.fofweb.com/Subscription/Science/Helicon.asp?SID=2&iPin=azchem0039
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Faraday
> http://www.acmi.net.au/AIC/FARADAY_BIO.html
> http://www1.umn.edu/ships/religion/faraday.htm
> http://www.tompotter.us/fields.html
> http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/faraday.htm
> http://www.phy6.org/Education/whfldlns.html
> http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Projects/Johnson/Chapters/Ch4_4.html
> http://home.earthlink.net/~drestinblack/faraday.htm
> http://physicalworld.org/restless_universe/html/ru_4_12.html
557
> http://www.newgenevacenter.org/sci-theo/5-2_relativity2.htm#lemaitre
> http://www.tompotter.us/faces.html
> http://www-ssc.igpp.ucla.edu/personnel/russell/papers/max_mag/
> http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-Michael-Faraday.htm
>
> Plus, there is a good summary "Timeline on Mathematics and Physics" at
http://superstringtheory.com/history/history1.html .
>
> Bye for now -> -- Mark
Hello Mark,
Its incredible in one sense how far we have come with our technology. In another sense I sometimes
wonder where we might of been now if it wasn't for the destruction of the great library of Rome and the
Medival period of the Dark Ages which spanned between 700-to-800 years. Our psychology, sociology,
and economics played a major role in our development and lack thereof in many cases.
I was in dismay a couple of nights ago when watching CNN International News and heard the
scientific panel assigned by President Bush came to the conclusion and made the statement it would be
about 25 years before it's possible to see hydrogen fuel cells in automobiles. Just as the Kennedys made
it to their social status with whiskey production, the Bush family is said to be deeply invested in oil.
It's frustrating to think the U.S. will probably be the last country on Earth to use alternative clean
fuel for common every day use. The Europeans will probably excel in this field based on necessity
(economics) and the world environment.
Mark, I've always loved and have followed wireless-radio communications as the field has
progressed to its present state of digital wide and narrow band. In the mid 80`s. I remember a friend and
I were testing several different types of two-way radios -- walkie talkies -- using a dual trace
oscilloscope. The DTO will display the time duration between point 'A' and point 'B' usually in milliseconds. This one radio appeared not to be working or communicating with the other radios at all.
When we tested it on the DTO, we determined it was transmitting a standing wave -- not the typical
sine-type wave. What I found interesting is the DTO displayed a Zero (0) duration time. My friend told
me a sine wave travels while a standing wave does not -- it just occupies space. And the space it
occupies is a function of its frequency(wavelength). It wasn't until several years later when reading
some physics articles that it occurred to me that maybe an all-penetrating, all pervasive- and
superluminal effects and/or signaling and communications may already be taking place via Standing or
Scalar types of fields. At Very Low Frequencies (VLF) or Ultra Low frequencies (ULF), the electrical
component of the field would -- in theory -- span and occupy a space almost the size of the Universe.
The magnetic component of the field would represent phase or motion of the electrical component. This
motion is probably very dynamic in its phase subtleties.
Based on this information that would make Zero hertz, Zero Frequency, also known as Direct
Current (DC) the size of what we call a "='Uuniverse'. I've always thought a wave is a open field , as in
sine wave. A field is a sine wave which closes on itself to become a type of virtual bubble which may
just float through our space and be detected as localized impeadence in a electrical system. These
bubbles will vary in size from particle size to the size of a universe , and all sizes in between. These Non
linear virtual type of bubbles probably come in a wide assortment of flavors based on there phase, spin
558
orientation; uni-phase, bi-phase, tri-phase, quad-phase, ei… Different combinations of phase orientation
could, in theory, be an infinite fractalized continuum.
Generally radio communications uses the typical sine wave with a periodic rate of it`s frequency,
like wise a non-linear standing or scalar type field has no presently detected periodic rate.
All waves are usually described with two components: sine/cosine, electrical/magnetic, pilot
wave/carrier wave. According to Arnold Sommerfeld and Leon Brillouin in the early 1900s, after
conducting experiments they concluded the phase velocity of a wave carries no coherent message or
information. This is paramount to stating no information exists in the magnetic, pilot, or cosine.
The phase velocity of a wave typically is measured as a factor which exceeds 'c' -- the speed-of-light
-- where the group velocity can approach but never meet or exceed 'c'. Group velocity is the actual sine
wave moving and traveling through space, where phase is the wave experiencing rotation onto- or-about
itself.
Mark, I agree Faraday, Einstein and many others through out History worked in some very appalling
environments. They all thought "outside the box" which I believe is an essential ingredient and is
relevant to their standard Universal model at the time.
Got to run. Have a Good one…
Mike
<= previous E-mails 300-349
next E-mails 400-449 =>
if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return
to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)
else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE>
this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'
559
Download