Selling Secrets of Phone

advertisement
Selling Secrets of Phone Users to
Advertisers
By CLAIRE CAIN MILLER and SOMINI SENGUPTA
Published: October 5, 2013









FACEBOOK
TWITTER
GOOGLE+
SAVE
EMAIL
SHARE
PRINT
SINGLE PAGE
REPRINTS

SAN FRANCISCO — Once, only hairdressers and bartenders
knew people’s secrets.
Enlarge This Image
Jim Wilson/The New York Times
Drawbridge executives Eric Rosenblum, left, and Kamakshi Sivaramakrishnan,
the founder. The company is one of several start-ups that have figured out how
to follow people in new ways.
More Tech Coverage
News from the technology industry, including start-ups, the Internet, enterprise
and gadgets.
On Twitter: @nytimesbits.
Now, smartphones know everything — where people go, what they search for, what they
buy, what they do for fun and when they go to bed. That is why advertisers, and tech
companies like Google and Facebook, are finding new, sophisticated ways to track
people on their phones and reach them with individualized, hypertargeted ads. And they
are doing it without cookies, those tiny bits of code that follow users around the
Internet, because cookies don’t work on mobile devices.
Privacy advocates fear that consumers do not realize just how much of their private
information is on their phones and how much is made vulnerable simply by
downloading and using apps, searching the mobile Web or even just going about daily
life with a phone in your pocket. And this new focus on tracking users through their
devices and online habits comes against the backdrop of a spirited public debate on
privacy and government surveillance.
On Wednesday, the National Security Agency confirmed it had collected data from
cellphone towers in 2010 and 2011 to locate Americans’ cellphones, though it said it
never used the information.
“People don’t understand tracking, whether it’s on the browser or mobile device, and
don’t have any visibility into the practices going on,” said Jennifer King, who studies
privacy at the University of California, Berkeley and has advised the Federal Trade
Commission on mobile tracking. “Even as a tech professional, it’s often hard to
disentangle what’s happening.”
Drawbridge is one of several start-ups that have figured out how to follow people
without cookies, and to determine that a cellphone, work computer, home computer and
tablet belong to the same person, even if the devices are in no way connected. Before,
logging onto a new device presented advertisers with a clean slate.
“We’re observing your behaviors and connecting your profile to mobile devices,” said
Eric Rosenblum, chief operating officer at Drawbridge. But don’t call it tracking.
“Tracking is a dirty word,” he said.
Drawbridge, founded by a former Google data scientist, says it has matched 1.5 billion
devices this way, allowing it to deliver mobile ads based on Web sites the person has
visited on a computer. If you research a Hawaiian vacation on your work desktop, you
could see a Hawaii ad that night on your personal cellphone.
For advertisers, intimate knowledge of users has long been the promise of mobile
phones. But only now are numerous mobile advertising services that most people have
never heard of — like Drawbridge, Flurry, Velti and SessionM — exploiting that
knowledge, largely based on monitoring the apps we use and the places we go. This
makes it ever harder for mobile users to escape the gaze of private companies, whether
insurance firms or shoemakers.
Ultimately, the tech giants, whose principal business is selling advertising, stand to gain.
Advertisers using the new mobile tracking methods include Ford Motor, American
Express, Fidelity, Expedia, Quiznos and Groupon.
“In the old days of ad targeting, we give them a list of sites and we’d say, ‘Women 25 to
45,’ “ said David Katz, the former general manager of mobile at Groupon and now at
Fanatics, the sports merchandise online retailer. “In the new age, we basically say, ‘Go
get us users.’ “
In those old days — just last year — digital advertisers relied mostly on cookies. But
cookies do not attach to apps, which is why they do not work well on mobile phones and
tablets. Cookies generally do work on mobile browsers, but do not follow people from a
phone browser to a computer browser. The iPhone’s mobile Safari browser blocks thirdparty cookies altogether.
Even on PCs, cookies have lost much of their usefulness to advertisers, largely because
of cookie blockers.
Responding to this problem, the Interactive Advertising Bureau started a group to
explore the future of the cookie and alternatives, calling current online advertising “a
lose-lose-lose situation for advertisers, consumers, publishers and platforms.” Most
recently, Google began considering creating an anonymous identifier tied to its Chrome
browser that could help target ads based on user Web browsing history.
For many advertisers, cookies are becoming irrelevant anyway because they want to
reach people on their mobile devices.
Yet advertising on phones has its limits.
For example, advertisers have so far had no way to know whether an ad seen on a phone resulted
in a visit to a Web site on a computer. They also have been unable to connect user profiles across
devices or even on the same device, as users jump from the mobile Web to apps.
More Tech Coverage
News from the technology industry, including start-ups, the Internet, enterprise and gadgets.
On Twitter: @nytimesbits.
Without sophisticated tracking, “running mobile advertising is like throwing money out
the window. It’s worse than buying TV advertisements,” said Ravi Kamran, founder and
chief executive of Trademob, a mobile app marketing and tracking service.
This is why a service that connects multiple devices with one user is so compelling to
marketers.
Drawbridge, which was founded by Kamakshi Sivaramakrishnan, formerly at AdMob,
the Google mobile ad network, has partnerships with various online publishers and ad
exchanges. These send partners a notification every time a user visits a Web site or
mobile app, which is considered an opportunity to show an ad. Drawbridge watches the
notifications for behavioral patterns and uses statistical modeling to determine the
probability that several devices have the same owner and to assign that person an
anonymous identifier.
So if someone regularly checks a news app on a phone in bed each morning, browses the
same news site from a laptop in the kitchen, visits from that laptop at an office an hour
later and returns that night on a tablet in the same home, Drawbridge concludes that
those devices belong to the same person. And if that person shopped for airplane tickets
at work, Drawbridge could show that person an airline ad on the tablet that evening.
Ms. Sivaramakrishnan said its pinpointing was so accurate that it could show spouses
different, personalized ads on a tablet they share. Before, she said, “ad targeting was
about devices, not users, but it’s more important to understand who the user is.”
Similarly, if you use apps for Google Chrome, Facebook or Amazon on your cellphone,
those companies can track what you search for, buy or post across your devices when
you are logged in.
Other companies, like Flurry, get to know people by the apps they use.
Flurry embeds its software in 350,000 apps on 1.2 billion devices to help app developers
track things like usage. Its tracking software appears on the phone automatically when
people download those apps. Flurry recently introduced a real-time ad marketplace to
send advertisers an anonymized profile of users the moment they open an app.
Profiles are as detailed as wealthy bookworms who own small businesses or new
mothers who travel for business and like to garden. The company has even more specific
data about users that it does not yet use because of privacy concerns, said Rahul Bafna,
senior director of Flurry.
Wireless carriers know even more about us from our home ZIP codes, like how much
time we spend on mobile apps and which sites we visit on mobile browsers. Verizon
announced in December that its customers could authorize it to share that information
with advertisers in exchange for coupons. AT&T announced this summer that it would
start selling aggregated customer data to marketers, while offering a way to opt out.
Neither state nor federal law prohibits the collection or sharing of data by third parties.
In California, app developers are required to post a privacy policy and to clearly state
what personal information they collect and how they share it. Still, that leaves much
mystery for ordinary mobile users.
Download