ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: AN INTRODUCTION Administrative Law is the body of rules, orders, and decisions issued by administrative agencies, such as the federal Securities and Exchange Commission or a state’s public utilities commission. Enabling Legislation: Legislative action specifying the name, purpose(s), function(s), and power(s) of the agency created by the legislation. As a general rule, an agency lacks the power to act beyond the scope of its enabling legislation. Administrative Agencies: Agencies authorized by federal or state legislation to make and enforce rules to administer and enforce legislative acts (e.g., the Social Security Administration). Executive Agencies: Agencies formed to assist the President or, at the state level, the Governor, in carrying out executive functions (e.g., the Justice Department). Independent Regulatory Agencies: Agencies neither designed to aid nor directly accountable to the legislative or executive branches (e.g., theSecurities and Exchange Commission). Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 1 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) AGENCY POWERS AND THE CONSTITUTION Delegation Doctrine: Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution empowers Congress to make all laws necessary for executing its specified powers. The courts have interpreted this passage as empowering Congress to establish administrative agencies and vest them with rulemaking, enforcement, and adjudicative powers. Rules vs. Statutes: While the Constitution empowers only Congress to make statutory laws, administrative agencies, to whom Congress delegates the responsibility for enforcing many of its statutory laws, are empowered to make rules, which are as legally binding as the statutes passed by Congress (and, perhaps, more likely to be vigorously enforced because the power to enforce agency rules generally lies with the same agency that made the rule in the first place, whereas the power to enforce Congressional statutes generally rests with some arm of the Executive Branch). Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 2 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) ADMINISTRATIVE RULEMAKING Rulemaking: The process of formulating new regulations. Rulemaking by federal agencies typically occurs in the following steps: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: A proposed rule and some discussion of its rationale are published by the agency in the Federal Register. The notice invites public comment and notifies the public of the times and places of any hearings on the proposed rule. Comment Period: Following publication in the Federal Register, the agency must allow ample time for public comment. The agency need not respond to all comments, but it must respond to any significant comments that bear directly on the proposed rule by either modifying the proposed rule or explaining why the modification was not made. Final Rule: Once the final version of the rule is decided upon by the agency, it will be published first in the Federal Register and then compiled annually in the Code of Federal Regulations. Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 3 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) AGENCY INVESTIGATIONS Both as part of the rulemaking process and as part of the enforcement of the rules, agencies conduct inspections of regulated entities’ facilities or business records. While many businesses voluntarily comply with agency requests for an inspection, those that do not may face: a subpoena compelling the entity to produce records (subpoena duces tecum) or to provide testimony (subpoena ad testificatum), or a search warrant compelling the entity to make its facilities available to the agency for inspection. To determine if an agency is overstepping its bounds in conducting an investigation, courts may consider: (1) whether the investigation has a legitimate purpose; (2) the relevance of the information sought; (3) the specificity of the agency’s demand for testimony or documents; and (4) the burden the demand places on the entity. Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 4 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) AGENCY ADJUDICATION If an agency determines that an entity has violated one or more rules, the agency may take administrative action against the entity. When possible, the agency will seek to secure the entity’s voluntary compliance, thus avoiding the expense and inconvenience of full-blown judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings. If voluntary compliance is not forthcoming, agency adjudication proceeds as follows: A formal complaint is filed by the agency, to which the subject entity files an answer. Following a period permitted for discovery, the agency and the entity will appear before an administrative law judge (ALJ) who will conduct a quasi-judicial (or “court-like”) proceeding, the exact nature of which varies from agency to agency. The ALJ issues an initial order, which is subject to appeal to the agency’s governing board (e.g., the actual commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission). After disposing of any appeal, the agency issues a final order, which may be appealed to a designated court (e.g., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit) Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 5 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) LIMITATIONS ON AGENCY POWERS Judicial Controls: Most agency decisions are subject to judicial review, provided that the party seeking review can establish that (1) it has standing to sue the agency, (2) there is an actual controversy between it and the agency, and (3) it has exhausted all administrative remedies. Courts defer to agency fact-finding and actions, and generally review agency decisions only for procedural irregularities, failure to properly interpret applicable statutes, lack of evidentiary support, constitutional issues, and abuse of agency power. Executive Controls: A president or governor generally has the power to appoint agency officials and to veto enabling legislation as well as appropriations. Legislative Controls: Congress or a state legislature must enact and may review and amend enabling legislation, and generally controls appropriations (subject to executive veto) to an agency. Congress may also “freeze” the implementation of new rules before they take effect. Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 6 West’s Business Law (9th ed.) PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY Freedom of Information Act (FOIA): Requires federal agencies to disclose certain records to any person on request, subject to restrictions as to time and place, and to make their records available electronically – including, but not limited to, via the Internet. Some states have similar legislation. “Sunshine” Legislation: Subject to certain specified exceptions, agency meetings must be (1) noticed to the public in advance and (2) open for public observation, if not participation. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA): Provides that, whenever a new regulation will have a “significant impact” upon a “substantial number” of small businesses, the agency must consider less burdensome alternatives, notify small businesses about forthcoming regulations, and reduce the record-keeping responsibilities of small businesses. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA): Empowers federal courts to enforce the RFA, requires federal agencies to explain new regulations in “plain English,” provides ombudsmen to receive comments and complaints from small businesses, and entitles small businesses to recover expenses and legal fees incurred due to “excessive” agency demands. Ch. 43: Administrative Law - No. 7 West’s Business Law (9th ed.)