TEAM BASED LEARNING: TEAM EVALUATION RUBRIC
CHECKLIST
Module ONE Guidelines
1) Assignment #1:

Mathematical Representation & Congruent Spreadsheet
√

Mathematical Representation is entitled, axes labeled correctly
X

Data Analysis: Mean, median, mode and range
√

Formulas are correct & visible in spreadsheet
√

Relevance or “non-relevance” of each elementary statistic
√

Analysis is correct
X

Both the Mathematical Representation & Spreadsheet are in one file
_ √
TEAM Comment: There are few things that you need to add to your assignment. For example, your
mathematical representation needs to have a title, and Y and X- axis needs to be labeled as well. When you
analyze your data you did mention that “ the higher total favors liking math and liking technology.”
However, in the end the data shows that more students like technology than math. You need to add more
details to you data analysis.
2. Assignment #2a:

Tenets & philosophy of the MST Inquiry Model
__ √ _

Relationship between Science Standards, Multiple Intelligences and Student
Target-Based Assessments
___X

Importance of integrating Web 2.0 tools and source ware in the classroom
_ √

Five -eight paragraphs
___ √

APA style
___ √
Assignment #2b:

Locate six Web 2.0 source ware tools in either Web Hosting, blogs, podcasts etc.
to augment your MST Inquiry Unit.
___√

Beneficial to students’ skill in mathematics, science and/or technology
___ √

URLs cited correctly in APA format
___ X
TEAM Comment: This assignment is developed well and it includes details about the Philosophy of the
MST Inquiry Model. The areas that I suggest elaboration is on the relationship of the MST inquiry to the
science standards. How does inquiry relate to the science standards? And, the APA format for the URLS cite
1
TEAM EVALUATION RUBRIC MODULE ONE
CBSE 7204NET1.V1.2013.7.16
aren’t listed. Here a link that will help to cite this correctly. http://www.citationmachine.net/apa/cite-awebsite. or https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/. Overall, this is a well written assignment.
3. Assignment #3a:

Define Inquiry Approach
__√_

The role of the Pedagogue in Science Inquiry
__√

Define the “Learning Cycle for Elementary Science Instruction”
__√

Five -eight paragraphs
__√_

APA style
__X
Assignment #3b:

Locate six free sites for teaching elementary science to augment your MST Inquiry Unit. __√_

Beneficial to students’ skill in science and technology
__√

URLs cited correctly in APA format
__X_
TEAM Comment: The assignment is well developed and included all the parts. The problem is in the APA
format style and that can be easily fixed by going on the website: www.citationmachine.net It is a very
helpful site for citing websites in APA format.
4. Assignment #4a:


Define (complete definition with an example for each) NCTM’s 5 Content Standards
& 5 Process Standards – Grades 3-5
APA style
X
__X
Assignment #4b

Locate six free sites for teaching elementary mathematics to augment your MST Inquiry Unit.__√ _

Lesson Plan Methodology
__√ _

List each Content & Process Standard every Site addresses
__X_

One paragraph per Web site
__√

APA style
__√ _
TEAM Comment: _In assignment 4a, you did define “Content” and “Process” standards. You gave the
general definition of each. However, you need to give an example for each standard. For example, 1 example
for each content standard and 1 example for each process standard so, altogether 10 examples. In your
second paragraph you mentioned, “content standards consists of 10 categories”. However, out of those 10
there are 5 process standards. You mentioned them again as process standards in your third paragraph. Use
the APA format for your in text citations. You did add the (NCTM) source in your reference page which is
great, just mention the source in your writing too (APA Style).
Part 4b) The six websites for teaching math is well written. However, the last website (Learn-with-mathgames) doesn’t list which Content and Process Standards.
CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENT & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TEAM # __1__ :
After assessing the above assignments for team 1, our team decided that for the most parts, the above
assignments are accurate, however some parts needs to be revised. Our team made some suggestions above,
the summary of these recommendations is as follow:
For assignment #1: Mathematical representation or graph needs to be entitled and axis needs to be labeled
and also add detailed analysis.
For assignment #2a &b: Draw a relationship between a science inquiry model and science standards. URL's
are not cited correctly in APA format. Here a link that will help to cite this correctly.
http://www.citationmachine.net/apa/cite-a-website. or https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/
For assignment #3a&b: It is a well-developed assignment. Use the APA format for citing the websites. As
mentioned above the website www.citationmachine.net would be a great help.
For assignment #4a&b: Add examples, 1 for each NCTM content and process standard. Use in text
citations APA format. For example, (NCTM., 2014). For the last website Learn-with-math-games list the
content and process standards.
EVALUATION TEAM # __7__:
DATE: ____September 22nd, 2014 ___
3
TEAM EVALUATION RUBRIC MODULE ONE
CBSE 7204NET1.V1.2013.7.16