Annual Performance Evaluation for Support Staff
Armstrong State University
Name:
Title:
Supervisor:
Rating Period (month/day/year):
Adherence to University Policy/Ethics:





Department:
From 1/1/
to
12/31/
Aligns with Job Description and Supports Armstrong’s Core Value Statement
#6 - We value ethical behavior and accountability that support high standards
of performance.
Adheres to university and departmental guidelines and established policies.
Conforms to university and department job standards and requirements.
Promotes and communicates policies and procedures in a positive manner.
Acts in the best interest of the University at all times, serves as an example for others.
Conducts business in an ethical manner.
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Rating:
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Job Knowledge:




Aligns with Job Description
Possesses skills and knowledge required for the job.
Ability to understand the required duties, responsibilities, skills, and procedures.
Demonstrates and applies a thorough understanding of his/her job processes and procedures.
Ability to anticipate and meet internal/external customer needs in a timely manner.
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Rating:
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Quality of Work:


Aligns with Job Description and Supports Armstrong’s Core Value Statement #6 - We value ethical
behavior and accountability that support high standards of performance.
Thoroughness and accuracy of work performed.
Performs to established standards.
Rating:
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Page 1 of 4
Dependability and Attendance:




Aligns with Job Description and Supports Armstrong’s Core Value Statement #6 - We
value ethical behavior and accountability that support high standards of performance.
Consistency in carrying out assignments.
Punctual to work.
Maintains consistent work attendance.
Demonstrates reliability under normal and ever-changing circumstances.
Rating:
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Productivity:




Aligns with Job Description and Supports Armstrong’s Core Value Statement #6 –
We value ethical behavior and accountability that support high standards of performance.
Produces a significant volume of acceptable, thorough, and accurate work.
Meets deadlines and assumes ownership of work product.
Continually strives to improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Ability to perform at a high level regardless of circumstances.
Rating:
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Interpersonal Skills:





Aligns with Job Description and Supports Armstrong’s Core Value Statement #3 –
We value an environment of mutual trust and collegiality that builds an inclusive community.
Demonstrates the ability to work in concert with others to foster a productive work environment.
Establishes and maintains friendly and professional relationships with peers and other constituents.
Respectful to co-workers.
Communicates with respect to co-workers and customers.
Expresses thoughts and ideas clearly.
Rating:
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Comments or Performance Examples:
Provide justification for “Exceptional” or
“Unsatisfactory.”
Page 2 of 4
Training Completed During Performance Period
This section identifies job-specific training completed during the performance period.
Training
Date Completed
Professional Development
Employee and Supervisor complete this section together.
List professional development needs for the next evaluation period, and explain how professional development can be
secured.
Current Goals
Employee and Supervisor complete this section together.
Goals defined and agreed upon last year and list results/status of efforts.
Goal Setting
Employee and Supervisor complete this section together. List job-related goals for the next evaluation period, and
explain how these goals can be achieved. In addition, align goals with the strategic goals and initiatives of the
university, and explain how the goals will promote and progress Armstrong’s strategic plan.
Employee Comments
This section provides the non-exempt employee being evaluated the opportunity to respond to the evaluation, to articulate
intentions for goal-setting and plans for improving performance and raising appraisal ratings, and to comment on ways in
which the employee believes his or her supervisor can help him or her grow professionally and/or manage more
effectively.
Page 3 of 4
Overall Performance Rating
N/A Not Applicable
Exceptional- Performs position requirements above expected level
Satisfactory - Performs position requirements at expected levels
Unsatisfactory - Performs position requirements below expected levels
Job Description Review: Please check the appropriate box.
Employee job description has been reviewed during this evaluation and no changes have been made to the
job description at this time. A copy of job description is attached to this evaluation.
Employee job description has been reviewed during this evaluation and modifications have been proposed
to the job description. The modified job description is attached to this evaluation.
Signatures
My signature acknowledges that my supervisor and I have discussed this evaluation, and have received a copy of the
evaluation and related attachments.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Employee Signature
Date
The non-exempt employee's signature indicates that the evaluation has been reviewed with the employee, and does not necessarily
indicate agreement with the supervisor's appraisal.
This evaluation was prepared by:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Supervisor Signature
Date
This evaluation was reviewed by:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Second-level Supervisor Signature (if applicable)
Date
Please provide a completed copy to the Director of Human Resources.
Page 4 of 4