Investor Relations Communications Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Goals: o Attract longer-term investors o Stabilize investor base o Build value for shareholders 2. Target highest potential institutional investors for one-on-one marketing: o Concentrate on small- to mid-cap value oriented portfolios o Highly selective approach o Requires management accessibility 3. Market aggressively to individual investors: o Market through BetterInvesting (also known as the National Association of Investors Corp.) o Capitalize on consumer appeal and familiarity 4. Increase analyst coverage: o Target brokerage houses with strong institutional sales o Address regional brokerages first to build credibility 5. Program: o Initial program runs nine months o Initial program cost: [Insert estimate] Investor Relations Communications Plan 1. Goals o Attract long-term investors o Stabilize investor base (reduce volatility) o Build value for shareholders 2. Observations and Situation Analysis Volatility deters value-oriented investors whose longer-term orientation tends to stabilize trading and support sustained price appreciation. Telecom stocks in general exhibit higher than average volatility; XYZ Corp.’s volatility is in the mid range for telecom peers (Table 1) XYZ Corp. tends to have a higher percentage of short sellers and lower percentage of institutional ownership than peer companies (Table 2) Among peer companies reviewed, XYZ Corp. is among those with the highest percentage of low and moderate turnover institutional investment and the lowest percentage of high turnover (Table 3) Although institutional interest is constrained by difficulty in taking large positions, there is potential institutional interest in XYZ Corp.: 76 institutional portfolios with low to moderate turnover, Value, GARP or Specialty investment styles, and positions in 2 or more lower-cap peers, but not XYZ Corp. (Table 4, institutional investment style definitions in Appendix 3) 50 mutual funds with low to moderate turnover, Value, GARP or Specialty investment styles, and positions in 2 or more lower-cap peers, but not XYZ Corp. (Table 5, institutional investment style definitions in Appendix 3) Low level of institutional holdings, partially due to high percentage of inside holdings Small-cap funds most likely receptive to stocks with limited float Potentially strong consumer franchise favors addressing retail market, but not all participants in retail market are suitable targets; media hype creating lottery mentality BetterInvesting offers opportunity to reach stable individual market, but approach favors dividend reinvestment XYZ Corp. has only one analyst with coverage (Table 6) Increased analyst coverage tends to increase P/E as well as build reservoir of potential investors 3. Messages o XYZ Corp. has turned the corner Eliminated under performing operations Gross margin improving Balance sheet is sound o Value-building strategy Capitalize on global presence Emphasize gross margin rather than revenue growth Branded services Accessories 4. Strategy o Encourage long positions Target institutions which hold peer companies but not XYZ Corp., select small cap funds and others Address individual Investors through Corporate website and BetterInvesting o Increase analyst coverage o Strengthen Market Maker relationships o Counter short interest by building shareholder loyalty as well as value 5. Tactics A - To encourage long positions (1) Institutional Investors a - Identify holders of peers but not XYZ Corp. b - Identify high potential small cap funds c - Mail and personal contact campaign Meetings with fund managers (groups or one-on-one) in key cities in region, then around U.S. -- three or four days per month Direct mail to top prospects and holders of large positions (see Appendix 1) d - Conference participation Institutionally sponsored Commercially sponsored e - Work with Marketing establish industry leadership image Press articles/interviews Expert spokespersons Reprints of articles by/about XYZ Corp. f - Message articulation Short (20 minute) and long (40 minute) format standard chart presentations for use at conferences and key city meetings (2) Individual Investors a - Use IR web page to promote value of XYZ Corp. investment by demonstrating a strong commitment to shareholders - IR Mission statement Treat shareholders as partners Open communication - Comments from management Strategy Milestones - Conference information (date, time, call-in number) - Quarterly results release dates - Industry trends - Technology updates - Any other useful, interesting, non-material information b - Link to BetterInvesting from corporate IR page c - Emphasize home state (or region) BetterInvesting Chapters Participate in Investor Fairs Visit a meeting of each club Letter and phone contact to follow-up d - Extra level of service in lieu of dividend (e.g., conference call for individual investors to meet with management) e - Plain English quarterly reports to shareholders in summary form. Post on web page, email and fax. Include instructions on accessing 10-Q either on web or requesting hard copy. B - Increase analyst coverage (1) Target regional brokerages with strong institutional sales (Appendix 2) as well as national firms (2) Add to news release and conference call fax lists (3) Phone and direct mail to establish contact (4) Meetings with management (5) Analyst Day - presentations and tours C – Strengthen market maker relationships (1) Address top five (over 50% of trading activity) (2) NASDAQ can assist with introductory meetings (3) Add to news release and conference call fax lists (4) Phone and direct mail follow-up (5) Meetings with management D - To counter short interest -- build shareholder confidence and loyalty 1. Use IR website to promote value of XYZ Corp. investment by demonstrating a strong commitment to shareholders a - IR Mission statement Treat shareholders as partners Open communication b - Comments from management Strategy Milestones c - Conference information (date, time, call-in number) d - Quarterly results release dates e - Industry trends f - Technology updates g - Any other useful, interesting, non-material information 2. Offer all investors (including individuals) opportunity to listen to conference calls, ask questions and receive copies of all news releases 3. Plain English quarterly reports to shareholders in summary form. Post on website, email and fax. Include instructions on accessing 10-Q either online or requesting hard copy. 6. Measurement 7. Changes in ownership and analyst coverage are indicators most closely linked to Investor Relations communications 8. Implementation 9. Budget Program Elements…………………….$162,000 (see Table 8 for a program budget) Technical Resources…………………. 32,000 $194,000 Table 1 Volatility: XYZ vs. Peers Beta Coefficient ABCD 0.47 EFGH 0.56 IJKL 0.62 MNOP 1.19 QRST 1.21 UVWX 1.27 XYZC 1.31 DCBA 1.39 HGFE 1.43 LKJI PONM TSRQ XWVU Source: I/B/E/S 1.49 2.01 2.07 2.86 Table 2 Ownership Profiles Peer Co. Ticker Inst. Insider Short % % Approx. Approx. Short Shares Out % of % of Balance of of Inst. Shares Insider Shares Shares Ttl Ttl Ttl Ttl PONM 761,800,000 1,250 58% 59% % 21,800,000 % UVWX 2,180,000,000 2,254 51% 1,111,800,000 11% 239,800,000 2% 40,500,000 787,900,000 36% TSRQ 55,700,000 213 50% 27,850,000 12% 6,684,000 2% 1,140,000 20,026,000 36% DCBA 932,300,000 1,167 45% 417,804,000 49% 455,096,000 6% 59,400,000 0 0% EFGH 2,700,000,000 2,612 44% 1,188,000,000 1% 27,000,000 1% 16,300,000 1,468,700,000 54% LKJI 753,400,000 1,394 40% 301,360,000 7% 52,738,000 1% 9,660,000 389,642,000 52% XWVU 27,100,000 213 40% 10,840,000 19% 5,149,000 4% 1,150,000 9,961,000 37% MNOP 4,690,000,000 1,527 23% 1,078,700,000 1% 46,900,000 0% 9,070,000 3,555,330,000 76% XYZC 60,142,000 88 22% 13,231,240 46% 27,665,320 3% 1,780,000 17,465,440 29% IJKL 85,800,000 239 17% 89% % 3,240,000 % HGFE 2,310,000,000 291 11% 254,100,000 84% 1,940,400,000 1% 15,900,000 99,600,000 4% ABCD 7,830,000,000 772 8% 626,400,000 77% 6,029,100,000 0% 9,900,000 1,174,500,000 15% Source: Market Guide # of inst. Table 3 Institutional Investor Turnover Low Moderate QRST 40 37 ABCD 36 40 UVWX 36 39 XYZC 41 33 MNOP 33 40 IJKL 30 40 LKJI 31 39 TSRQ 36 34 DCBA 31 37 XWVU 28 37 EFGH 36 28 HGFE 26 37 PONM 27 36 Source: NASDAQ Online High 23 24 25 26 27 30 30 30 32 35 26 37 37 Table 4 Selected Institutional Targets (Positions in two or more small to mid cap XYZC peers) Name Turnover Style Type of Company Franklin Advisers, Inc. M Income Value Banks & Trusts Merrill Lynch & Company Inc. M Specialty Research Firms Mellon Equity Associates, LLP M Core Value Investment Advisors Franklin Portfolio Associates L.L.C. M Deep Value Investment Advisors Renaissance Technologies Corp. L Specialty Hedge Funds Delphi Management, Inc. L Deep Value Investment Advisors Pinnacle Associates Limited M GARP Investment Advisors Anchor Capital Advisors, Inc. M Deep Value Investment Advisors Goldman Sachs & Company M Specialty Research Firms AAL Capital Management Corporation M GARP Investment Advisors First Manhattan Capital Management L GARP Investment Advisors WM Advisors Inc. M GARP Investment Advisors Lord, Abbett & Co. M Income Value Investment Advisors Wallace R. Weitz & Company M GARP Investment Advisors Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Invt. Mgmt. M GARP Investment Advisors (MAS) Dreyfus Corporation M GARP Investment Advisors Evergreen Institutional Asset Management L Core Value Banks & Trusts Smith Barney Asset Management L GARP Investment Advisors Virginia Investment Counselors L Core Value Investment Advisors Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Invt. Mgmt. M GARP Investment Advisors U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Asset Mgmt. (MN) M Core Value Banks & Trusts Zurich Scudder Investments, Inc. M Core Value Investment Advisors T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. M GARP Investment Advisors Heartland Advisors, Inc. M Deep Value Investment Advisors Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (NJ) M Deep Value Investment Advisors Raymond James & Associates, Inc. M Specialty Investment Advisors Fidelity Management & Research M GARP Investment Advisors Teacher Retirement System of Texas L GARP Pension Funds Texas Employees' Retirement System M Core Value Pension Funds Bank of Oklahoma M Income Value Banks & Trusts First National Bank of Southwest Ohio L Core Value Banks & Trusts Lyon Street Asset Management Company L Income Value Banks & Trusts Kahn Brothers & Company Inc. L Deep Value Investment Advisors Federated Investors, Inc. M Core Value Investment Advisors Dean Investment Associates M Core Value Investment Advisors Banc of America Capital Management, Inc. M Core Value Banks & Trusts Morgan Guaranty Trust Corp. M Core Value Banks & Trusts Ragen MacKenzie Inc. M Specialty Research Firms Fleet Investment Advisors, Inc. L GARP Banks & Trusts Banc One Investment Advisors Corporation M Core Value Banks & Trusts Manchester Capital Corporation L Core Value Investment Advisors Sandler Capital Management M Specialty Investment Advisors Ohio Public Employees' Retirement System Ayco Company Lazard Asset Management Ltd. Roll & Ross Asset Management Associated Bank N.A. Victory Gradison Capital Management Ohio State Teachers' Retirement System Gofen & Glossberg, L.L.C. Prudential Securities, Inc. Northern Trust Company of Connecticut Parametric Portfolio Associates, Inc. Royce & Associates, Inc. U.S. Trust Corporation Qwest Management Wesbanco Bank Wheeling BNY Asset Management Shufro, Rose & Co. LLC Citizens Investment Services Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Advisors, Inc. RBC Dain Rauscher Wessels Capstone Asset Management Company National City Corporation Deere & Co. Travelers Investment Management Co. (TIMCO) Advest Group Manufacturers Advisers Corporation (Toronto) CIBC World Markets Corp. J.P. Morgan Private Bank Hilliard Lyons Investment Management HSBC Asset Management Firstar Bank N.A. Wells Fargo Bank, Iowa N.A AIB Investment Managers Ltd. (Dublin) Source: NASDAQ L M M M M M L L M M M M L L M L M L M M M L L M M GARP GARP Core Value Core Value GARP GARP Core Value Core Growth Specialty GARP Deep Value Deep Value Core Value Core Value Core Value Income Value Deep Value Core Value Specialty Core Value Specialty Core Value Core Value GARP Core Value Pension Funds Investment Advisors Investment Advisors Investment Advisors Banks & Trusts Investment Advisors Pension Funds Investment Advisors Research Firms Investment Advisors Investment Advisors Investment Advisors Banks & Trusts Pension Funds Banks & Trusts Banks & Trusts Investment Advisors Banks & Trusts Research Firms Investment Advisors Research Firms Investment Advisors Banks & Trusts Pension Funds Investment Advisors M M M M L M M L M Specialty GARP Specialty Core Value Core Value Core Value Core Value Core Value GARP Research Firms Insurance Co.s Research Firms Banks & Trusts Investment Advisors Banks & Trusts Banks & Trusts Banks & Trusts Investment Advisors Table 5 Selected Mutual Fund Targets (Positions in two or more small- to mid-cap XYZ peers) Name Turnover Style GCG Trust - Capital Growth Series M GARP UBS (Lux) Equity Fund – Technology M Specialty Franklin Global Communications Fund M Specialty Gabelli Global Telecommunications Fund L Specialty INVESCO Telecommunications Fund M Specialty Franklin Templeton VIP Franklin Global Comm. M Specialty Secs. Vanguard Windsor II Fund (Dallas) L Income Value Weitz Partners Value Fund M GARP Heartland Value Fund L GARP WM Mid Cap Stock Fund L N/A Prudential Small Company Fund, Inc. M Core Value Wasatch Small Cap Growth Fund L GARP Van Kampen American Value Fund M Income Value Fidelity Select Wireless Portfolio L Specialty iShares Dow Jones US Telecom Sector Index Fund M Specialty Weitz Value Fund M GARP Kent Small Company Growth Fund L GARP Putnam Utilities Growth & Income Fund M Specialty Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund L GARP AIM Global Telecommunications Class M Specialty DFA U.S. 6-10 Small Company Series L Index StrategicNova U.S. Midcap Value Fund M GARP Kemper Small Cap Value Fund L GARP Kobren Delphi Value Fund M Core Value Gabelli Global Multimedia Trust Inc. L Specialty Scudder Small Company Value Fund M Deep Value Northern Global Communications Fund M Gabelli Asset Fund L Core Value Protective CORE U.S. Equity Fund M Deep Value Goldman Sachs Funds US CORE Equity Portfolio M Specialty TIFF U.S. Equity Fund M Deep Value Gabelli Equity Trust, Inc. L Core Value Evergreen Utility and Telecommunications Fund L Specialty Advance Capital I Equity Growth Fund L GARP Gabelli Global Opportunity Fund M N/A Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund M Deep Value USAA Small Cap Stock Fund M Legg Mason U.S. Small-Capitalization Value Trust M Deep Value Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund M GARP Target Portfolio Trust-Small Capitalization Value M Core Value Delaware Pooled Small-Cap Growth Equity M Portfolio Elliott & Page American Growth Fund M GARP Guardian Investor-Gabelli Capital Asset Fund M GARP JPVF Small Company Portfolio M GARP Chase Vista Capital Advantage - Capital Growth Scudder Variable - Scudder Small Cap Value Port. JP Morgan Investment - JPM USD Global Balanced CG Capital Markets Fund Small Cap Value Equity T. Rowe Price Total Equity Market Index Fund Advance Capital I Balanced Fund Source: NASDAQ M M M M L L GARP GARP Core Value Deep Value GARP Core Value Table 6 Analyst Recommendations Strong Peer Company (Ticker) Buy (1) XWVU DCBA EFGH LKJI PONM HGFE MNOP IJKL TSRQ ABCD UVWX XYZC Source: Zacks 5 16 12 8 8 5 8 2 1 2 Buy (2) 2 9 3 10 10 10 13 5 3 8 11 Neutral (3) Total Recommendations Consensus 2 3 2 3 3 5 3 2 11 10 1 7 27 18 20 21 18 26 10 5 20 23 1 Table 7 Market Maker Volume: Knight Securities Schwab Capital Markets Herzog, Heine, Geduld Legg Mason Wood Walker Susquehanna Capital Group McDonald & Co. Sec. Inc. Island System Corporation Raymond James & Associates Sherwood Securities Corp. Tucker Anthony Incorporated Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Merrill Lynch B-Trade Service LLC Jefferies & Company Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co. REDIBook ECN LLC Midwest Stock Exchange ABN AMRO Securities (USA) Bank of America Securities The Brass Utility % of Total 15.8% 11.0% 8.9% 7.1% 6.5% 5.1% 5.0% 4.1% 3.3%% 3.2% 2.8% 2.2% 1.8 1.7% 1.7% 1.6% 1.3% 1.2% 1.1% 1.0% 12 Month Total 17,726,588 12,344,113 9,956,671 7,988,534 7,272,433 5,685,036 5,600,771 4,637,603 3,727,791 3,614,863 3,158,224 2,459,886 1,992,040 1,947,648 1,896,202 1,786,262 1,472,055 1,339,109 1,237,399 1,143,958 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 3.0 First Union Securities 1.0% Southwest Securities Inc. 0.9% Fidelity Capital Markets 0.9% ING Barings Furman Selz, LLC 0.9% Sanders Morris Harris Inc. 0.8% Salomon Smith Barney 0.7% Millennium Securities Corp. 0.7% Arichipelego 0.6% Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co. 0.6% 25 MisTSRQaneous Market 2.7% Makers Non-registered Market Makers 4.1% Total 100% Source: NASDAQ Italic = ECN 1,086,171 1,012,312 962,173 961,323 918,219 758,603 753,143 697,783 650,634 2,986,500 4,566,789 112,340,836 Table 8 Strategy/Tactics Budget Strategy: Encourage Long Positions Tactics: Institutions Individuals Targeting study & analysis 1 Web Page 1 1 Mission Statement 1 1 Conference Calls 1 1 Webcast conference calls 1 1 Expanded Fax Distribution 1 Management Presentations 1 Regional Meetings 1 Sponsored Conferences 1 Spokesmanship/Interviews 1 1 Article reprints 1 NAIC Membership 1 NAIC chapters (Texas) 1 Greensheet 1 Annual Conference 1 Phone and Direct mail Fax/Conference Call follow-up Analyst visits Analyst Day 1 = primary 2 = secondary Increase Coverage Market Maker Relationships Counter Short Interest 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Budget $20,000 5,000 3,000 4,000 500 2,000 36,000 20,000 7,000 1,000 7,000 4,500 15,000 10,000 7,000 20,000 $162,000 Appendix 1 – Direct Mail to Institutions & Mutual Funds Monthly mailings to include: 1. Letters from XYZ Corp. Management: CEO – Growth strategy and outlook COO – Overview of operations CFO – Financial performance and key metrics Regional Management – Region overviews 2. Article reprints, news releases with cover letter 3. Non-material background data (e.g., product mix by technology) with cover letter 4. Product sample with cover letter on marketing strategy 5. Marketing CD (or USB flash drive) and cover letter on value-added services 6. 7. Order flow schematic to illustrate unique service capabilities with cover letter on XYZ Corp. capabilities Occasional mailing of promotional product with XYZ Corp. logo imprint Appendix 2 – Targeted Analysts Regional: Regional Firm A, Analyst Name Regional Firm B, Analyst Name Regional Firm C, Analyst Name Regional Firm D, Analyst Name Regional Firm E, Analyst Name Regional Firm F, Analyst Name National: National Firm A, Analyst Name National Firm B, Analyst Name National Firm C, Analyst Name National Firm D, Analyst Name Appendix 3 – Investment Style Definitions In Nasdaq Online, there are 13 possible styles, defined below, by which institutional investors are classified by the source of the data, the Carson Group. The Carson Group employs quantitative techniques based on key financial fundamentals of an investor's portfolio: primarily, the portions of the portfolio above the weighted average of the S&P 500 for price-to-earnings ratio, dividend yield, price-to-book ratio, and five year estimated earnings per share (EPS) growth. An institution must generally meet all the criteria for a given style. In some cases, however, the securities that an investor is buying and/or selling currently provide a better indication of the true investment style being employed. If a portfolio is not available for a given investor, the Carson Group applies its unique knowledge of the investor's behavior to accurately classify its dominant style. For "Global" investors, a specific style has been given which is based on a review of the North American securities held in the portfolio. The 13 possible investment styles are as are as follows: Aggressive Growth -- Aggressive growth investors employ an extreme version of the growth style. Their aggressiveness may be defined primarily by holding stocks in companies that are either growing extremely quickly, are in an early stage of their life cycle, and/or have minimal or no current earnings. In general, Aggressive Growth investors have higher portfolio turnover than most investors, as their style requires them to react quickly as new information becomes available that is either positive or negative concerning growth rates. Core Growth -- As the name suggests, these managers invest in large, blue chip companies that have historically performed at or near the top of the S&P 500 in terms of earnings and revenue growth. As a result, Core Growth investors are often willing to pay up for these blue chip companies, purchasing issues that trade at higher price-to-earnings and price-to-book multiples. As an example, companies in the Pharmaceutical and Consumer Product industries often are heavily weighted in Core Growth investor's portfolios. Core growth investors usually have a long term investment horizon, as they employ a buy and hold strategy. Core Value -- Investors with this investing style focus on buying securities at relatively low valuations on an absolute basis or in relation to the market or historical levels. Value portfolios typically exhibit below-average price-to-earnings, price-to-book and price-to-cash flow multiples. In addition, growth and profitability characteristics are frequently below market averages, but with an expectation for improved future performance. Core Value investors typically invest in industries such as Energy and Financials, which trade at discounts to the general market, but perform consistently over the long term. This style is similar to Core Growth, as Core Value investors also try to employ a buy and hold strategy--holding issues until their valuations start to approach or exceed market multiples. Deep Value -- This style is a more extreme version of value investing that is characterized by holding the stocks of companies with extremely low valuation measures. Often these companies are particularly out-of-favor or in industries that are out-of-favor. Some investors in this category are known for agitating for changes such as new management, the sale of assets or a spin-off. This group of investors is sometimes categorized as "contrarian," as they usually invest in companies whose prospects are regarded as negative by the rest of the market. Emerging Markets -- This style refers to those money managers investing the majority of their equity assets in stocks of companies domiciled outside of North America. In most cases, the North American portion of the portfolio is either too small or does not exist, precluding The Carson Group from determining an accurate investment style based on the fundamentals of these companies. For "Global" investors which have more significant North American holdings, a specific style may be given which will apply primarily to the North American portion of the portfolio. Growth at a Reasonable Price (GARP) -- As the name suggests, GARP investors try to build their portfolios with securities that are trading at a discount to the market, but are expected to grow at higher rate than the market average. This is a more conservative investment style in comparison to an outright growth-oriented strategy. In addition, dividend yield is generally not a concern of GARP investors. Growth -- Growth investors bridge the gap between the Aggressive Growth and Core Growth investment styles. They tend to be slightly more aggressive than Core Growth investors, willing to pay slightly higher multiples for stocks and trade at a more active pace. In general, they are looking for companies growing at superior rates than the general marketplace, but are unwilling to pay for extremely high multiples. Income Value -- These investors are similar to those employing the Core Value style except that they place an emphasis on buying issues with higher than average dividend yields. Index -- These investors generally create portfolios which are designed to match the composition of a broad-based index such as the S&P 500, the Wilshire Small Cap, and the Russell 3000. Therefore, the performance and risk of the portfolio mirrors the general market. Their investment decisions are driven by indices, not by an evaluation of the companies or their securities. The Carson Group categorizes these funds based on the firm's historical investment behavior. International & Emerging Markets -- These investors focus the majority of their investments outside of North America, particularly Western Europe and Japan. Momentum -- These institutions invest in stocks when their earnings, earnings estimates, or prices are advancing at a faster rate than the market or other stocks in the same sector. Momentum investors generally look for stocks experiencing upward earnings revisions or are producing positive earnings surprises. Most of the investors in this category have very high portfolio turnover rates due to a short-term focus, and therefore will liquidate positions at the slightest hint of a disappointment or deceleration. The Carson Group categorizes these funds based on the firm's historical investment behavior. Specialty -- Specialty investors tend to have a narrowly-defined investment universe, in that they have pre-determined biases towards certain companies, industries or sectors, regardless of their financial characteristics. Examples include investors that specialize in specific industries or hold a particularly high concentration of a single stock or a very small set of stocks, or specialize in convertible securities. The Carson Group categorizes these funds based on the firm's historical investment behavior. Yield -- Yield investors focus on companies with yields that are well above-average and on their ability to continue making or increasing dividend payments. Investors that fall into this category tend to focus on income and safety more than on capital appreciation. Beta (Nasdaq definition): A statistical measure of a stock’s volatility compared with the overall market. A beta of less than 1 indicates lower risk than the market; a beta of more than 1 indicates higher risk than the market. Beta (I/B/E/S definition): A measure of the sensitivity of a stock’s price to the movement of an index (S&P 500). In I/B/E/S, the Beta factor is the slope of a straight line fitted to 156 observations of weekly relative price changes. These observations are equal to the ratio of the weekly percent price change in a particular stock to the weekly percent change of the S&P 500.