QUESTIONS
Jason G. Brent www.jgbrent.com
Warnings:
1. Do not expect an answer to the questions which I will pose below. It is almost certain that humanity will not answer the questions I will pose below in time to prevent the horrific deaths of billions of human beings.
2. In this essay I will use a phrase which carries a lot of emotional baggage. I am using that phrase with full knowledge that it will upset you, cause you emotional distress and disgust you. My purpose in using that phrase is to make it clear to you that the problems facing humanity cannot be sugarcoated and must faced today if we want to avoid the horrific deaths of billions of human beings.
3. You almost certainly will take the position that what I have written below is highly immoral. That does not trouble me as what I have written below is immoral based upon the definition used by humanity today. However, the definitions used by humanity today for the words "moral", " immorality" and 'immoral" are totally irrelevant and unimportant. The only definitions of "morality", "moral" and "immoral" which are important are those made by nature. Nature does not care about the definitions of those words used by humanity.
The only questions which are important for humanity today are-- Who will make up the master race? When will the master race be created? and How will the master race be created? The master race will not be based upon race, religion, national origin, or anything similar. Rather, the words "master race" merely describe those who will survive to reproduce after the substantial reduction in population.
Due to the facts set forth below there will be a substantial and precipitous reduction in the human population in the very near future . At this point in this essay I will not set forth a date which this will occur nor will I set forth the level to which population will be reduced. However, it will be very soon and very substantial.
Facts 1) the Earth is finite in size, 2) the non-renewable resources the Earth can provide humanity are finite in size, 3) the non-- renewable resources which the Earth provides humanity are essential for industrialized civilization to continue to function and to permit
7 billion of our species to exist on this planet, 4) when one or more of those nonrenewable resources are exhausted, in an economic sense, industrialized civilization will collapse and the number of human beings that survive to reproduce after that collapse will be substantially below 7 billion, 5) humanity is presently using resources commonly thought of as renewable at a rate greater than the resources can be replaced by nature and/or human intelligence and, therefore, these renewable resources must be considered non-renewable, 6) new technologies, recycling, environmentalism, substitution of one resource for another resource, alternative energy sources and anything else humanity may do today or in the future will not stop the reduction in population from the current 7 billion to some lower number, 7) space travel is not the answer to the coming collapse of our population--- we will not be able to import resources from extra-terrestrial sources in

time and in an amount to prevent the coming collapse and will not be able to export population to extra-terrestrial planets in time and in amount to prevent the coming dramatic and precipitous drop in the human population, and 8) humanity has withdrawn from the Earth the most easily accessible resources which the Earth can provide-- in the future resources will become more expensive and difficult to obtain as they will be substantially less accessible and will be more difficult to process into usable forms.
A strong case can be made that the reduction in population described above has already commenced. You may want to consider the collapse of society in Somalia, the Sudan and
Rwanda. You may want to review the deaths caused by starvation, lack of sanitation and similar items. You may want to examine the "Arab Spring" and determine if these events were caused by a desire for democracy or because of the inability of the governments involved to provide jobs and resources (including food at affordable prices) that the masses needed and demanded. By definition if the "carrying capacity" of the Earth is 100 and there are 300 people alive 200 must die off. And the carrying capacity of the Earth cannot be infinite, it must be a finite number.
You are urged to read the works of William Catton, Richard Heinberg, David Pimental,
James Lovelock, Chris Clugston and many others who have presented factually supported cases that the Earth cannot support (without defining the word "support" or the words
"carrying capacity") more than 2 billion human beings. You are urged to go to www.wakeupamerika.com (it is spelled with a "k" and not a "c") and read the brilliant work of Chris which presents evidence, which in my opinion cannot be refuted, that there will be a rapid and precipitous decline in population in the very near future due to the inability of the Earth to provide the resources which our civilization requires.
There are many words which could be used to describe those who will be alive after the reduction in the human population. They could be called " reproducers" , "survivors",
"lucky ones", "unlucky ones, "the ones chosen by God", "the ones that produced the most offspring, "the most vicious ones", "the strongest ones, the ones who lived in the most remote places, etc. Hopefully, you get the idea that there are many words and concepts which could be used to describe those that survive the coming collapse of civilization and the social order. I have chosen to call those that survive and reproduce "the master race" for the reasons I set forth above. However, what they are called is really unimportant.
While you may disagree with the position I have taken that there is a 100% certainty that a substantial and precipitous drop in population will occur in the very near future, based upon all of the problems presently facing humanity, you cannot disagree that there is a substantial chance that there will be a substantial reduction in population within a relatively short period of time. Even if the chance of a substantial reduction in population occurring within the next 150 years is only 50%, humanity must plan and prepare for that horrific situation. The point is very simple-- we can debate the variables as to time when such a reduction occur and percentage chance of it occurring. However, unless the time is very far into the future and the chance of it occurring is very low humanity must plan and prepare for the event happening as failure to plan and prepare will result in the horrific deaths of billions of human beings.

Since life began on this planet, about 3.6-.40 billion years ago, there is one rule that never has been violated and never will be violated--- when the number of individuals of a particular species exceeded the ability of the niche which the species occupied to provide the resources for that level of population a struggle for existence occurred until the number of individuals was reduced to the level which the resources of the niche could provide-- commonly known as Darwinism, survival of the fittest or the law of natural selection. And this law will be applied to humanity once the Earth cannot supply the resources needed by the population at the then existing level of per capita usage of resources--- when the combination of the number of people inhabiting the Earth and the average per capita usage of resources exceeds the ability of the Earth to provide those resources.
Let me be very blunt! Everything in this essay is not politically correct. All of humanity does not want to discuss or consider the possibility that Darwinism applies to humanity and that there will be a struggle for existence with the strong (no matter how defined) either killing or not permitting the weak (no matter how defined) to reproduce. The human sense of what is moral or immoral finds what is written in this essay highly offensive and disgusting. However, as indicated at the beginning of this essay the human sense of what is moral or immoral is unimportant. Nature determines what is moral and what is immoral.
What is important is that humanity must plan today for a substantial and precipitous decline in population due to the inability of the finite Earth to provide the resources necessary for the current 7 billion or the projected 10 billion to survive.. There are two, and only two, ways by which a very substantial reduction in population can occur--1) by the intelligence of the human species or 2) by letting nature determine who will survive and reproduce after the substantial reduction in the population. To put the ways by which population will be reduced into other words--- either 1) by violence or 2) nonviolence or at least a minimum level of violence and destruction.
To summarize what is written here--- since humanity (based upon the number of individuals existing on the planet and based upon their average per capita usage of resources) has exceeded or will shortly exceed the ability of the Earth to provide the necessary resources for 7 billion or 10 billion of our species to continue to survive, there will be a substantial and precipitous reduction in population causing a struggle for existence between and among human beings. In order to reduce the number of horrific deaths that must occur, humanity must plan for that reduction and answer the three questions I posed at the beginning of this essay-- Who will make up the master race?
When will the master race be created? and How will the master race created?
One last comment. If you got this far in the essay, you must think the author is a nasty son of a bitch and thinks he should be a member of the master race. I am not a nasty son of a bitch, but I do think I should be a member of the master race. However, and more importantly, I will do all in my power to convince my two grandsons not to have children and let my line die out. I take that position because someone must start the ball rolling to rapidly reduce population and since I am writing about it I should one of the ones to get

the ball rolling. Also I would rather my line die out than for my great-grandsons to become murders or be murdered or my great-granddaughters to be gang raped to death by a band of marauders searching for food and other resources when the collapse comes.