Power Projection Enhancement Team (PPET)
Assessment Checklist FY02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
Page
1
Bookmark
2
Go to Page
SIDPERS
3-6
Go to Page
Reassignment Processing
7-8
Go to Page
E-1/E-4 Advancements
9
Go to Page
SGT/SSG Promotions
10
Go to Page
Suspension Of Favorable Personnel Actions
11
Go to Page
AWOL/DFR Controls
12
Go to Page
13-15
Go to Page
16
Go to Page
16
Go to Page
Officer Reassignment Processing
17-18
Go to Page
Enlisted Reassignment Processing
19-21
Go to Page
22
Go to Page
23-24
25-27
Go to Page
Go to Page
28-31
Go to Page
32
Go to Page
33-34
Go to Page
Table Of Contents
Work Center Supervisor PSC/BDE/BNS1
Battalion S1 (BNS1) Management:
Promotions:
Enlisted Promotions
Enlisted Promotion Worksheet (DA
Form 3355-E)
AAA-294 – SGT/SSG Recommended List for Promotion
Reassignments:
Personnel Readiness:
MOS Medical Review Board (MMRB)
PERSTEMPO
Unit Status Reporting (USR)
SIDPERS Interface Management (PAS)
Personnel Processing:
Transition Center
Replacement Center
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
1
WORK CENTER SUPERVISOR PSC/BDE/BNS-1
NCOIC:
UNIT:
E-Mail Address:
AREAS
1. LOCAL SYSTEM TABLES MANAGEMENT:
a.
b.
Pg. 1 Of 1
Are all the below tables populated:
(1) T14, Suspense Instructions?
(2) T16, Authentication Details?
(3) T43, Order Distribution Scheme?
(4) T51, Command Sequence Information?
(5) T71, Mailing/Distribution Address?
(6) T72, Letterhead Details?
(7) T73, Office Symbol?
(8) T78, Authority Line?
Has the Order Control Log been set?
2. REFERENCE MATERIAL:
YES
XXX
XXX
NO
XXX
XXX
REMARKS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX
a. FORSCOM PPET HomePage
http://www.forscom.army.mil/ppet
b. Hastily Executed Lookup Program (H.E.L.P.) SCP0409-00.
c. PERSCOM SIDPERS-3 Procedures and Guidelines
http://www-perscom.army.mil/tagd/sidpers3/page1.htm.
d. MILPER Messages.
http://perscomnd04.army.mil/milpermsgs.nsf
e. Army Publications and Regulations.
http://www.usapa.army.mil/
3. ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT:
XXX
a. Are new SIDPERS-3 Users trained IAW Local and
PERSCOM security procedures and guidelines?
b. Are there primary and secondary active Tarantella
and SIDPERS account?
c. Have all departed personnel user accounts been
retired?
d. Have all user accounts of personnel on leave or TDY
been disabled upon departure?
e. Has the Security Automation System Manager been
provided a copy of all Tarantella and SIDPERS-3 user
IDs and password since date of last password change?
f. Are user accounts reviewed monthly to ensure
system security is maintained?
g. Are passwords changed every 90 days or IAW local
policy?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
2
SIDPERS (BNS1)
NCOIC:
Pg. 1 Of 4
CLERK:
UNIT:
E-Mail Address:
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
a. # Of 75B personnel assigned/authorized?
b. # Of non-75B personnel assigned SIDPERS
duty?
c. # Of personnel trained in SIDPERS 3?
d. # Of UPC’s assigned?
___________
___________
___________
___________
2. REFERENCE MATERIAL:
Are the following updated reference materials on hand thru automated or hard copy:
YES
NO
a. Hastily Executed Lookup Program?
b. AR 600-8-6, dated 24 September 1998?
c. AR 600-8-11 dated I October 1990?
d. AR 600-8-101dated 1 March 1997?
e. AR 600-8-105 dated 24 October 1994?
f.
AR 614-100 dated 31 October 1997 Change 1?
g. AR 600-8-19 dated 2 October 2000?
h. AR 600-8-2 dated 30 October 1987?
i. DA PAM 600-8 Management and Administrative
Procedures?
j. AR 630-10 (Absence Without Leave, Desertion,
And Administration Of Personnel Involved In Civilian
Court Procedures)?
k. AR 190-9 (Absentee Deserter Apprehension
Program And Surrender Of Military Personnel To
Military Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies)?
l.
Unit SOP?
m. Local SIDPERS MOI/LOIs?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
3
SIDPERS (BNS1)
NCOIC:
Pg. 2 Of 4
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
3. PERSONNEL PROCESSING
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Are soldiers’ required to properly in-process the
installation prior to reporting to the unit?
b. Are BN staff activities/units accomplishing the
requirements specified in the Personnel Inprocessing Record, DA Form 5123-1-R?
c. Does the BNS1 conduct a final check of soldier’s
in-processing to ensure non-deployment conditions
are corrected or reported to the commander?
d. Does the BNS1 follow-up on all suspense actions
required for soldier’s readiness processing
requirements? Note: See AR 600-8-101, Chapter 4,
Levels 1 and 2.
e. Are soldiers arriving to the unit with
PERSTEMPO historical report? Note: Identify high
deployers.
f. Is the DA Form 647 being maintained IAW AR
600-8-6?
4. MAINTAIN PERSONNEL REPORTS
a. Are the following files/reports maintained IAW AR
25-400-2?
(1) AAA-162 (Unit Personnel Accountability
Report)?
(2) AAA-165 (Unit Personnel Accountability
Notices)?
(3) AAA-342 (Alpha Roster)?
(4) AAA-095 (Suspension of Favorable
Personnel Action Management Report)?
(5) AAA-161 (Unit Manning Report)?
(6) AAA-344 (Personnel Edit Report)?
(7) AAA-117 (Unit Enlisted Advancement
Report)?
(8) AAA-294 (Unit Eligibility Roster)?
b. Does the unit annotate the Unit Commander’s
Finance Report monthly with all newly
arrived/departed personnel and provide it to the
Finance Office?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
4
SIDPERS (BNS1)
NCOIC:
Pg. 3 Of 4
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
5. UNIT PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY
REPORT (AAA-162) RECONCILIATION
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Is the battalion producing the report twice monthly
to reconcile with the PAS?
b. Are unit historical copies produced monthly in
conjunction with the Unit Status Reporting (USR)
submission?
c. Does the strength reported on USRs match the
AAA-162?
d. Are corrective measures taken to ensure
transactions are submitted during or immediately
after reconciliation?
e. Does the unit conduct a PAI whenever a
f. Change of Command occurs or as directed? Is it
forwarded to the PAS for review?
g. Are PAIs procedures IAW AR 600-8-6?
6. Submission of Arrival Transactions:
a. Does the unit attempt to submit arrivals on
soldiers immediately upon signing into the unit? Is
the soldier annotated on the AAA-162 upon arrival to
the unit?
b. Does the Work Center Supervisor (WCS) ensure
that temporary arrivals are not submitted?
c. Does the unit notify the PAS when they are
unable to submit a regular arrival after three days?
d. Are arrival transactions revoked for erroneously
arrived soldiers?
7. Submission of Departure Transactions:
a. Does the unit wait until a pending loss record is in
SIDPERS 3 prior to submitting departure
transactions?
b. Does the unit ensure departure transactions are
not submitted on soldier’s separating or retiring?
c. Does the unit verify the Transition Center is
submitting departure transactions within 24 hours of
effective date?
d. Does the unit notify the PSB when a gaining UIC
is not reflected in SIDPERS-3 and a soldier is within
30 days from his/her PCS?
e. Are departure transactions submitted NLT the
next workday after the soldier departs the unit?
f. Are departure transactions submitted in error,
revoked on the same day or as soon as discovered?
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
5
SIDPERS (BNS1)
NCOIC:
Pg. 4 Of 4
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
6. UNIT PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY
NOTICES (AAA-165) RECONCILIATION
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Do Battalions and separate companies annotate
any changes on the latest copy of the AAA-165 until
action is taken and a new report printed?
b. Are BNS1’s and separate companies working and
resolving all notices as soon as possible?
7. UNIT MANNING REPORT (AAA-161)
a. Does the unit ensure that the current MTOE
document is correct in SIDPERS-3?
b. Are all changes manually posted to the AAA–161
upon receipt and SIDPERS transactions updated
submitted as necessary?
c. Are all soldiers in a unit assigned a position
number reflected on the AAA–161? Note: Soldiers
should not remain assigned to position number 9992
(Incoming Assigned Personnel) beyond 7 days after
arrival in a unit.
d. Are assigned soldiers who cannot be properly
slotted reflected as “Reassignable Overstrength?”
8. ALPHA ROSTER (AAA-342)
a. Does the BNS1 view or print this report?
b. Are RSC Codes 1D, 1Q, 2Y, 3B, and 3E
immediately resolved?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
6
REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING (BNS1)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
Pg. 1 Of 2
UNIT:
AREA
1. ARE THE FOLLOWING REFERENCES
AVAILABLE:
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. AR 600-8-11 (Reassignment) & Update to
CH 7, dated 5 Aug 99?
b. AR 600-8-105 Military Orders 28 Oct 94)?
c. AR 614-30 (Overseas Service) 16 May 97?
d. AR 614-100 (Officer Assignment Policies,
Details and Transfers) 15 Jul 84?
e. AR 614-200 (Selection of Enlisted Soldiers
for Training and Assignment) 31 Oct 97?
2. REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING:
a. Do clerks have access to SIDPERS-3 with
their own ID and password?
a.
b. Do clerks print the SIDPERS-3
Reassignment Interview Schedule (AAA-287)
weekly to determine who must attend upcoming
levy briefings?
c. Is the clerk printing the SIDPERS-3
Reassignment Notices (Memorandum, AAA-231)
weekly and distributing to soldiers in a timely
manner?
d. Does the Bn S1 screen the reassignment
notice for special processing requirements and
schedule the BnS1 Interview?
e. Is the S1 conducting the BnS1 interview prior
to soldier attending the levy briefing by
completing the First Endorsement on the AAA231?
f. Does the Bn S1 generate a Deficiency Notice
from the Bn Cdr report (AAA-049) for each
soldier on AI? Is corrective action initiated before
sending the soldier to Reassignments Section for
an interview?
g. Does the unit ensure that soldiers attend their
scheduled levy briefing?
h. Does the Bn S1 ensure that all
documentation and requirements for the soldiers
AI are completed & forwarded to Reassignments
Section for orders issuance?
i. Are reassignment orders received at least 90
days prior to soldier’s report date?
j. Does the unit submit DPRT transactions to
update the database on EDAS/local/or intra-unit
reassignments?
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
7
REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING (BNS1)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
Pg. 2 Of 2
UNIT:
E-Mail Address:
AREA
YES
NO
REMARKS
3. PROCESSING DELATION/DEFERMENT
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Is the S-1/orderly room aware of policies and
procedures for requesting deletion or deferment
of AI and counsels/assists soldiers with
applications?
b. Is the S-1/orderly room ensuring requests for
deletion/deferment are submitted within 30
calendar days from the EDAS cycle date, or if a
situation arises after the initial 30 day period, the
request is submitted within 72 hours?
c. Is the Bn S1 aware of the procedures to
request for early arrival? Are requests submitted
in a timely manner?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
8
E1 – E4 ADVANCEMENTS (BNS1)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
Pg. 1 Of 1
UNIT:
AREA
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
a. Is the current AAA-117 Report reconciled against the
previous months report to determine if previous actions have
processed?
b. Does S1 screen AAA-117 Report for
additions/deletions/grade discrepancies, and are the reports
annotated with current data? If changes are made, are they
then transferred to ad hoc query?
c. Does promotion clerk compute waiver allocations utilizing
the AAA-119 (E2-E3 only)?
d. Does the unit use a battalion roll-up to compute E4 waiver
allocations using AUTHORIZED E4 strength only?
e. Are allocations computed correctly?
f. Are units excluding soldiers from waiver computations
IAW AR 600-8-19, chapter 2, para 2-5h? (Army Civilian
Acquired Skills Program, Stripes for Education, Ranger and
CMF 18)
g. Do commanders review the AAA-117 report to determine
advancement potential of each soldier by indicating
“YES/NO” next to the soldier’s name? Does the commander
sign the report? Does the battalion commander circle
“YES/NO” and sign the report for all specialist advancements
with waiver?
h. Are soldiers denied automatic advancement to PV2, PFC
and SPC on a DA Form 4187E prepared using SIDPERS-3
and using proper codes and submitting transaction on the
20th of the month prior?
i. Is a DA Form 4187E (SIDPERS-3 generated) prepared
for those soldiers selected for advancement?
j. Is a copy of the AAA-117 report forwarded to the
Promotions Section after completion and verification along
with waiver computation worksheet, ADHOC query, and two
copies of DA Form 4187 on each soldier selected for
advancement?
k. Is the PSB suspense being met for turn-in of AAA-117?
l. Is the original AAA-117 Report, waiver computation
worksheet (AAA-119), ADHOC query and copy of promotion
orders filed in accordance with AR 25-400-2?
m. Are there any illegal promotions?
n. Are advancement certificates (DA Form 4874) prepared
for those soldiers advanced to SPC?
o. Are SIDPERS transactions submitted on SPC/CPL and
below who are reduced?
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
9
SGT/SSG PROMOTION (BNS1)
NCOIC:
Pg. 1 Of 1
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
a. Does the commander use the Enlisted Promotion Report
(AAA-294) to identify soldiers eligible for promotion to
SGT/SSG?
b. Does the commander complete the DA Form 3355
Section A for those soldiers recommended and nonrecommended for promotion?
c. Does the promotion authority complete DA Form 3355,
Section A by entering the signature block, signature and
checking approval or disapproval?
d. Does the promotion authority review DA Form 3355 and
DA Form 4856 on non-recommendation for final decision IAW
AR 600-8-19, Para 3-12h and Milper-Message 00-238?
e. Does the promotion authority properly appoint the
promotion board?
f. Does the S-1 promotion clerk review the DA Form 3355
with the soldier to determine accuracy and completeness?
g. Is soldier's signature obtained on the worksheet?
h. Are promotion boards convened prior to the 15th of the
month?
i. Does promotion authority convene a promotion board
and, after the board adjourns, review the board proceedings,
and personally approve or disapprove the report within 3
working days?
j. Does the promotion authority file the original reports of
the board proceedings, DA FM 3356 and DA FM 3357?
k. Are tracking systems established to monitor
reevaluations, point adjustments, initial promotion packet
submission, & the 24-month revalidation process to the
Promotions Section?
l. Are soldier’s identified/removed from the Promotion
Standing List (IAW AR 600-8-19, Para 3-31? Are requests
for removal forwarded to the PSB?
m. Are copies of the unit EDAS C-10 and AAA-095 report
authenticated by the unit commander and forwarded to the
Promotions Section by the established suspense date?
n. Does the promotion clerk review the EDAS C-10 for
accuracy, ensure all recommended soldiers are listed on the
report and report all discrepancies to the Promotion Section
for corrective action?
o. Does the S-1 ensure that the latest promotion points are
posted on the EDAS C10 Report, initialed by the soldiers,
and filed?
p. Does promotion clerk provide source documents to notify
the Promotion Section of reductions involving SGT/SSG
personnel?
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
10
SUSPENSION OF FAVORABLE PERSONNEL ACTIONS(BNS1)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
Pg. 1 Of 1
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
a. Does the company commander request S-1 to prepare
DA Form 268-E (SIDPERS-3) and does the company
commander ensure it is authenticated?
b. Does the S-1/separate company orderly room furnish a
copy of AAA-O95 Report and DA Form 268-E to S-2 and
retention?
c. Does the S1 forward a copy of the DA Fm 268 to the
servicing Finance and Accounting Office?
d. Does the S-1/separate company orderly room update and
annotate the AAA-O95 Report file copy identifying FLAG and
ERUP codes?
e. Is the S-1/separate company orderly room sending the
AAA-O95 Report to the commander for review and
signature?
f. Are ERUP codes being submitted by retention and
verified by the S1?
g. Is the S-1/separate company orderly room retaining the
final copy of DA Form 268 in a separate folder for one year?
h. Does the unit verify the accuracy of the flagged soldiers
on the AAA-160?
i. Are “initial” and “removal” FLAG transactions submitted
with the correct effective date?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
11
AWOL AND DFR CONTROL (BNS1)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
Pg. 1 Of 1
UNIT:
AREA
YES
E-Mail Address:
NO
REMARKS
a. Whenever a soldier is absent without authorized
leave, does the commander conduct an immediate
inquiry to determine the soldier's true status?
b. Based on the latest AAA- 162 report,
dated____________, is there any soldier listed in an
AWOL/DFR duty status?
c. Does the S-1/separate company unit clerk prepare
a DA Form 4187 for submission to PSB and FAO upon
notification that a soldier is AWOL (24 hours after
scheduled return date)?
d. Does the S-1/separate company notify the local
Provost Marshal within 24 hours of soldier's absence
and provide information, which could lead to early
apprehension?
e. Does S-1/unit commander initiate Suspense of
Favorable Actions (FLAG) utilizing SIDPERS 3
immediately upon determination that a soldier is
AWOL?
f. Does S-1/unit commander initiate action regarding
reporting of derogatory information and suspense of
access? Is DA Form 5248-R submitted to S-2?
g. Is a signed copy of the personal property inventory
retained by the S-1/separate company for inclusion in
the DFR packet?
h. Does the S-1/separate company prepare a letter
notifying absentee's next of kin by 10th day of
absence?
i. Does the S-1/separate company drop individual
from the rolls from the unit at 0001 hours on the 31st
consecutive day of AWOL?
j. Does S-1/separate company submit the DFR
SIDPERS transactions?
k. Does S-1/separate company prepare a DA Form
4187 for DFR?
l. Does the unit commander complete DD Form 553
and forward a copy to the local provost marshal office?
m. Does the unit commander complete DD Form 458
and forward along with DFR packet to PSB?
n. Does the unit forward the original copy of the DFR
packet within 48 hours after soldier has been placed in
a DFR status?
o. Are files maintained IAW DA PAM 25-400-2?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
12
ENLISTED PROMOTIONS
NCOIC:
Pg. 1 Of 4
CLERK
UNIT:
AREA
Are the necessary references and reports on hand to
process Enlisted promotion actions:
a. Hastily Executed Lookup Program?
b. AR 600-8-105 dated 24 October 1994?
c. AR 600-8-19 dated 2 October 2000?
d. Local SIDPERS MOI/LOIs UNIT SOP?
1.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACCURACY OF
DA FORM 3355-ES AND EDAS C10:
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
REMARKS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Does Promotion Section conduct monthly
reconciliation of promotion packets using EDAS C10?
b. Are all promotion packets accounted for?
c. Are promotions packets properly maintained and
contain all supporting documentation?
d. Are systems in place to monitor initial promotion
packet submitted & forwarded to the unit?
e. Are unit promotion board proceedings received
within 3 working days after the board convening date?
f. Are systems in place to monitor requests for
reevaluation/point adjustments?
g. Are systems in place to monitor the 24-month
revalidation process?
h. Are systems in place to ensure timely submission
of promotion points into EDAS/TAPDB?
i. Are systems in place to monitor soldier’s promotion
eligibility using the by-name list?
j. Are systems in place to ensure EDAS transaction
updates SIDPERS 3?
k. Are incoming promotable SPCs/SGTs identified
during in processing?
l. Are outgoing promotable SPCs/SGTs identified
during out-processing to ensure that they hand-carry
their promotion packet to their next duty station?
m. Are clerks familiar with EDAS/TAPDB promotion
functions?
n. Does the Promotion Section have access to
PERNET/EDAS/MS51?
o. Does the Promotion Section have SIDPERS3
access?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
13
ENLISTED PROMOTIONS
NCOIC:
Pg. 2 Of 4
CLERK
UNIT:
AREA
2.
ACCURACY AND TIMELINESS OF
PROMOTION ORDERS SGT/SSG:
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Are promotions orders produced and maintained
IAW AR 600-8-105?
b. Does the promotion section verify that soldiers are
in a promotable status prior to orders being published?
c. Do all promotion orders contain pertinent
information related to a soldier’s promotion (i.e.
NCOES waiver, Exception to Policy granted by HQDA,
Conditional Promotion, etc.)?
d. Are orders published at least two duty days prior to
the effective date of promotion?
3.
MONITORING THE AAA-117 REPORT:
a. Is there a system in place to ensure timely
submission of the AAA-117 report from the units?
b. Are the AAA-117 reports reviewed prior to
acceptance from the units for accuracy?
c. Is the promotions section auditing 10% of units
serviced?
4.
MONITOR EDAS C10:
a. Does the section have an EDAS C10 report on
file for each unit serviced?
b. Are all EDAS C10 reports monitored and
updated to reflect soldier promotion, in/outprocessing soldiers, or promotion point changes?
5.
SENIOR PROMOTION ORDERS
DISTRIBUTION:
a. Are queries run to identify NCOs eligible for
promotion?
b. Are copies of promotion orders distributed NLT two
working days prior to the effective date of promotion?
c. Are NCOs eligibility verified prior to promotion?
6.
EDAS By-Name-List Management:
Are Non-Promotion Reason Codes coded in EDAS in a
timely manner and are all codes correct?
7.
Promotion Standing List Removal
Management:
Is DA PERSCOM policies and procedures for removing
soldiers from the Promotion Standing List followed?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
14
ENLISTED PROMOTIONS
NCOIC:
Pg. 3 Of 4
CLERK
UNIT:
AREA
8.
E5/E6 Conditional Promotions
Management:
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Are request for conditional promotions to SGT
being processed IAW MILPER Messages 01-108 and
01-236?
b. Are all fully eligible SSG’s being conditionally
promoted when the cutoff for promotion has been met?
c. Are soldiers being administratively reduced when
NCOES requirements are not meet within 12 months
of promotion effective date?
d. Is EDAS/SIDPERS being screened to determine
conditional promotion eligibility prior to conditionally
promoting soldiers?
RECOMMENDATIONS/REMARKS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
15
ENLISTED PROMOTIONS
Pg. 4 Of 4
ENLISTED PROMOTION WORKSHEET (DA FORM 3355-E)
NCOIC:
CLERK:
ELEMENT
UNIT:
YES/NO
ELEMENT
TYPE
APPROVAL AUTHORITY
NAME
AWARDS/DECORATION
SSN
MILITARY EDUCATION
RECOMMENDED
GR/MOS
WAIVERS
REQUIRED
CIVILIAN EDUCATION
DUTY
PERFORMANCE
POINTS
TOTAL BOARD POINTS
YES/NO
E-Mail Address:
ELEMENT
YES/NO
RECOMMENDED
INDIV
BOARD
RECORDER
(INIT/TOTAL
REEVAL)
PROMOTION
AUTH
(INIT/TOTAL
REEVAL)
SOURCE
DOCUMENTS
PROMOTION
BOARD
PROCEEDINGS
EDAS SCREEN
PRINTOUT
TOTAL ADMIN ISTRATIVE
POINTS
TOTAL PROMOTION
POINTS
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL
APFT SCORES
WEAPON QUAL
AAA-294 – SGT/SSG Recommended List for Promotion
ELEMENT
YES/NO
ELEMENT
ZONE OF
CONSIDERATION
NAME
PROMOTION
SCORES
PROMOTION POINTS DATE
YES/NO
ELEMENT
YES/NO
RECOMMENDED
MOS
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
16
OFFICER REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING
NCOIC:
CLERK:
AREA
1. AVAILABILITY OF REQUIRED
ITEMS:
a. Are all of these references available:
UNIT:
Pg. 1 Of 2
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
(1) AR 600-8-11 (Reassignment) 1 Oct
94?
(2) AR 600-8-105 (Military Orders) 28
Oct 94?
(3) AR 614-30 (Overseas Service) 25
Sep 98?
(4) AR 614-100 (Officer Assignment
Policies?
(5) Details and Transfers) 17 Sep 90?
(6) DA Pam 600-8-30(PAS)?
(7) DA Pam 600-8-31 (Bde/Bn)?
(8) DA Pam 600-8-32 (PSB/MPD)?
(9) DA Pam 600-8-33 (G1/AG)?
b. Do all soldiers have a current desktop
SOP?
2. TOPMIS PROCESSING:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Does Officer Reassignment Section have
access to PERNET/TOPMIS/TOPMIS II?
b. Does the Officer Reassignment Section
print the summary report on TOPMIS II
weekly and obtain the RFOs for all officers
who were placed on AI during the previous
week?
c. Is the clerk inputting the non-EDAS
assignment instructions in SIDPERS-3 prior
to creating the reassignment folder?
d. Does the PSB have procedures to identify
soldiers on AI without assignments in
SIDPERS?
e. Is the clerk notifying the officer to attend
the levy briefing?
f. Does the Officer Reassignment Section
have a system to follow the reassignment
process from receipt of the RFO until
distribution of the PCS orders to the
unit/officer?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
17
OFFICER REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING
NCOIC:
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREA
3. MANAGE PERSONNEL
ASSIGNMENTS:
Pg. 2 Of 2
E-Mail Address:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Does individual reassignment files contain
applicable documents?
(1) Assignments requiring security
clearances, ______ of ______ files
reviewed contained appropriate
documentation.
(2) Assignments requiring APFT
verification, _____ of ______ files
reviewed contained appropriate
documentation.
(3) Assignments requiring TDY
documentation, _____ of ______
files reviewed contain appropriate
documentation.
(4) Assignments requiring special
qualifications, _____ of ______ files
reviewed contain appropriate
documentation.
b. Are Special Management Command
(SMC) assignments managed properly?
c. Does the Officer Reassignment Section
suspense units for documentation that verifies
soldier’s eligibility for an assignment?
5. PRODUCTION OF REASSIGNMENT
ORDERS:
a. Are reassignment orders produced IAW
PERSCOM Regulatory guidelines?
b. Are control procedures in place to ensure
that soldiers receive orders in a timely
manner?
c. Are procedures in-place to accurately
calculate DLOS/Availability date?
d. Are orders published at least 90 days
prior to DLOS?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
18
ENLISTED REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING
NCOIC:
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREAS
E-Mail Address:
YES NO
1. REFERENCE MATERIALS:
XXX
XXX
Are all of these references available:
(1) AR 600-8-11 (Reassignment) 1 Oct 94?
(2) AR 600-8-105 (Military Orders) 28 Oct 94?
(3) AR 614-30 (Overseas Service) 25 Sep 98?
(4) AR 614-200 (Selection of Enlisted Soldiers
for Training and Assignment) 31 Oct 97?
(5) DA Pam 600-8-30(PAS)?
(6) DA Pam 600-8-31 (Bde/Bn)?
(7) DA Pam 600-8-32 (PSB/MPD)?
(8) DA Pam 600-8-33 (G1/AG)?
(9) Local Policies and Procedures?
XXX
XXX
2. EDAS CYCLE PROCESSING:
XXX
XXX
REMARKS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Does Reassignment Section have PERNET and
EDAS access?
b. Does Reassignment Section have access to
SIDPERS-3?
c. Does the Reassignment Section print the EDAS
FTP files to include LOSS, LOSD, DELDEF and
MODF each week and compare data with the
SIDPERS EDAS Cycle to identify discrepancies?
d. Does the Reassignment Section print the
SIDPERS-3 EDAS Soldier Losing Assignments
AAA-234 each week?
e. Is the PAS notified when the weekly EDAS file
has not been received?
f. Does each reassignment packet contain the
SIDPERS-3 losing assignment sheets? Have they
been compared for accuracy and steps taken in
SIDPERS-3 to resolve discrepancies?
g. Are Non-EDAS AIs being populated when EDAS
assignment did not processed in SIDPERS?
h. Does the Reassignment Section have written
procedural guidance for the S1s on reassignment
processing in SIDPERS-3?
i. Does the Reassignment Section take the
appropriate action to delete a soldier’s AI when they
have not reenlisted/extended to meet Service
Remaining Requirements within 30 days from EDAS
Cycle Date?
j. Does Reassignment Section submit requests for
deletion/deferment to arrive at PERSCOM within 60
calendar days of EDAS cycle date, or within 72
hours after situation occurs (after the initial 60
days)?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
19
ENLISTED REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING
NCOIC:
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREAS
E-Mail Address:
YES NO
2. EDAS CYCLE PROCESSING (Cont.):
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
k. Upon receipt of transition orders for personnel
separating/retiring, is the appropriate action taken to
delete the soldier from his/her EDAS assignment?
3. MANAGE PERSONNEL ASSIGNMENTS:
a. Is Reassignment Section conducting initial
screening of the EDAS Cycle IAW AR 600-8-11,
Table 2-4?
b. Is the Reassignment Section processing initial
reassignment notifications IAW AR 600-8-11, Table
2-6?
c. Do individual reassignment files contain
applicable documents?
(1) Assignments requiring security clearances,
______ of ______ files reviewed contained
appropriate documentation.
(2) Assignments requiring APFT verification,
_____ of ______ files reviewed contained
appropriate documentation.
(3) Assignments requiring TDY documentation,
_____ of ______ files reviewed contain
appropriate documentation.
(4) Assignments requiring special qualifications,
_____ of ______ files reviewed contain
appropriate documentation.
(5) Assignments requiring reenlistment or
extensions, _______ of _______ files
reviewed contain appropriate
documentation? Are the Reassignment
Section deleting soldiers within 30 days of
AI if the appropriate documentation is not
received from the unit?
d. Does the Reassignment Section suspense units
for documentation that verifies soldier’s qualification
for an assignment?
e. Does Reassignment Section verify if the
soldier’s availability date is the same as their DLOS
& takes action if there are discrepancies?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
20
ENLISTED REASSIGNMENT PROCESSING
NCOIC:
CLERK:
UNIT:
AREAS
E-Mail Address:
YES NO
5. PRODUCTION OF REASSIGNMENT
ORDERS:
XXX
XXX
REMARKS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Are reassignment orders produced IAW
PERSCOM guidelines?
b. Are control procedures in place to ensure that
soldiers receive orders in a timely manner?
c. Are orders produced and distributed IAW
regulatory guidelines?
d. Are PCS orders administratively correct
e. (IAW AR 600-8-105), especially as to the
availability date vs. DEROS date, report date,
name/UPC of gaining unit, and special instructions
from EDAS?
f. Are PCS orders published at least 90 days prior
to DLOS?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
21
MOS MEDICAL REVIEW BOARD (MMRB)
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
AREAS
1. AVAILABILITY OR REQUIRED
ITEMS
a. Does MMRB clerk have a copy of AR
600-60 and AR 40–501 or are the
regulations readily available on the MMRB
clerk's computer desktop?
b. Does the command have
comprehensive standard operating
procedures (SOP) for conducting MMRBs?
c. Has MMRB clerk coordinated with the
hospital to receive a list of P3/P4 profiles
on recurring basis?
d. Are MMRBs conducted monthly, as a
minimum?
e. Are soldiers with P3 profiles scheduled
for the first MMRB possible, after MMRB
clerk receives profile from the hospital?
f. What is the average MMRB processing
time (from receipt of the profile from the
hospital to the time the approval authority
signs the MMRB results)?
g. Are soldiers scheduled to appear
before MMRBs briefed on the procedures?
h. Are automated tracking systems
established to monitor soldiers pending
MMRBs?
i. Does the MMRB clerk monitor the
progress of soldiers:
(1) Placed in a probationary status,
MEB?
SECTION:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Average MMRB processing time =
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
(2) Recommended for reclassification?
(3) Referred to the physical disability
system?
j. Is MMRB section involved in the USR
laydown process to verify the accuracy of
personnel reported non-deployable due to
MMRB proceedings?
k. Are departing soldiers screened to
determine if they have a P3 profile and are
pending MMRB action?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
22
PERSTEMPO
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
AREAS
1. INSTALLATION LEVEL
SECTION:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Is there published guidance to
subordinate commands?
b. Is periodic training scheduled for new
PERSTEMPO clerks/managers?
c. Are PERSTEMPO accounts cancelled
when clerks rotate?
d. Are procedures in place to manage
high deployers at the installation level?
e. Are request to exceed thresholds
processed IAW PERSTEMPO business
rules?
f. Is the installation PERSTEMPO
Manager conducting periodic checks to
ensure units are entering creditable events
into the system?
2. UNIT LEVEL
a. Have units appointed primary and
alternate PERSTEMPO clerks?
b. Have primary and alternate
PERSTEMPO clerks received training via
the train the trainer program or from the
online module?
c. Does the primary and alternate clerks
have valid PERSTEMPO accounts?
d. Are accounts /passwords shared?
e. Are clerks knowledgeable on how to
log into AKO and PERSTEMPO and enter
PERSTEMPO data?
f. Do PERSTEMPO clerks maintain a list
of all managed AHRIs with a signature?
g. Are CDRs/1SGs authenticating data
before it is entered into the PERSTEMPO
system?
h. Are CDRs/1SGs checking data entered
into the system to ensure it is accurate?
i. Are source documents maintained for
each creditable event entered into the
system? (Unit Training Files Marks # 35041b)
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
23
PERSTEMPO
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
AREAS
2. UNIT LEVEL (Cont.)
j. Is PERSTEMPO included as part of inprocessing and out-processing
procedures?
k. Are high deployers managed IAW
PERSTEMPO Business Rules?
l. Is the commander informed of potential
high deployers?
m. Are letters prepared and forwarded
IAW the time line specified in the business
rules?
n. Does the unit ensure departing clerks
PERSTEMPO accounts are cancelled?
o. Are the following references on hand
automated or hard copy:
(1) Local command policy?
SECTION:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
(2) PERSTEMPO User's Manual
(latest version)?
(3) PERSTEMPO Business Rules
(latest version)?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
24
UNIT STATUS REPORTING
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREA
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Total by category:
XXX
XXX
(1) Required =
XXX
XXX
(2) Authorized =
XXX
XXX
(3) Assigned =
XXX
XXX
(4) Available =
XXX
XXX
b. Total by Grade:
XXX
XXX
(1) Required =
XXX
XXX
(2) Authorized =
XXX
XXX
(3) Assigned =
XXX
XXX
(4) Available =
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
1. REFERENCES & MATERIALS:
Are the following references & materials available:
(1) AR 220-1 w/applicable changes and messages?
(2) DA PAM 611-21?
(3) Unit Accountability Report, AAA-162?
(4) Enlisted MOS Inventory by name, AAA- 163?
2. PERSONNEL ACCOUNTABILITY
c. Is supporting documentation presented at USR turn
in to reflect changes to reconcile the AAA-162 and the
AAA-163?
d. When are the above reports reconciled?
3. DETERMING REQUIRED STRENGTH
a. Is the MTOE/TDA used to determine required
strength?
b. Does Required Strength exclude augmented TDA for
non-TOE positions?
c. Does Required Strength include authorized PROFIS
personnel?
d. Is the current PROFIS roster dated within 30 days of
USR? PROFIS updated monthly?
4. DETERMING ASSIGNED STRENGTH
a. Is assigned strength percentage determined by
comparing assigned versus required strength?
b. Are PROFIS personnel assigned to required PROFIS
positions?
c. Is assigned strength adjusted to the “as of” date of
the USR? (15th of the month)?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
25
UNIT STATUS REPORTING
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREA
5. DETERMINE AVAILAVBLE PERSONNEL:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Is there a list of non-availables by name and
condition?
b. Are personnel attached to other units excluded?
6. DETERME AVAILABLE STRENGTH
PERCENTAGE
a. Is available strength percentage based on a
comparison of available strength and required strength?
b. Are PROFIS personnel included?
7. Determine Available MOS QUALIFIED
PERSONNEL
a. Is available MOSQ percentage based on a
comparison of available strength and required strength?
b. Does MOSQ exceed available strength?
c. Are officers counted on a one for one basis?
d. Using the first 3 characters of the MOSC, are enlisted
soldiers MOSQ when they can be used in their PMOSC,
SMOSC, AMOSC or an MOSC that can be substituted
for the above IAW DA PAM 611-21?
e. Using the first 4 characters of the MOSC, are
Warrant Officers MOSQ when they can be used in their
PMOSC, SMOSC, AMOSC or an MOSC that can be
substituted for the above IAW DA PAM 611-21?
f. Have PROFIS personnel been awarded Area of
Concentration (AOC) and Additional Skill Identifier (ASI)?
g. Are personnel in over-strength skills reported as
excess?
8. DETERMINE AVAILABLE SENIOR GRADE
PERCENTAGE
a. Is available SR Grade percentage based on a
comparison of the number of available Commissioned
officer, Warrant Officer & SGT-CSM to required SR
grade personnel?
b. Are PROFIS counted in the SR grade calculation
when MOSQ?
9. CALCULATE PERSONNEL LEVEL
a. Are P-levels calculated IAW AR 220-1 para 4-7 step
10?
b. Are composite P-levels calculated IAW AR 220-1
para 10-5.b table 10-1?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
26
UNIT STATUS REPORTING
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREA
10. DETERMINE PERSONNEL TURNOVER
PERCENTAGE:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Is turnover is based on comparing the number of
personnel reassigned or separated from the reporting unit
during the 3 months preceding the “as of” date of the
report to assigned strength on the “as of” date?
11. MANDATORY REMARKS:
a. Are top 10 critical MOSs identified?
b. Are remarks required IAW para 4-10?
12. MANNING PRIORITY:
a. Is the utilization guidance in AR 614-200 para 3-10a
(10) & d (7) being considered when computing MOSQ?
b. What’s the procedure for identifying available
personnel for Squad Crew Manning?
c. Are personnel assigned to “OTHER MTOE positions
battle rostered to a squad crew for USR reporting?
d. Are personnel serving in SD, BMM, & TD who are
available battle rostered to a squad crew for USR
reporting?
13. AUTHENTICATION OF PERSONNEL
REMARKS:
Does the G1/S1 write or validate the personnel remarks in
the ready remarks and overall personnel narrative
sections of the unit status report?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
27
SIDPERS INTERFACE MANAGEMENT (PAS)
The PAS falls within the managerial framework and field unit organization of the military personnel system.
The PAS can be divided into five major functional areas. These areas are Management, Communications,
Customer Support, Training and System Database Maintenance. NOTE!!!!!!!!! The SIDPERS portion will
significantly change "after" the fielding of the Super Server - Host Terminal Data Server (HTDS) concept.
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREAS
1. REFERENCE MATERIALS:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. FORSCOM PPET HomePage
http://www.forscom.army.mil/ppet
b. Hastily Executed Lookup Program (H.E.L.P.) SCP0409-00.
c. PERSCOM SIDPERS-3 Procedures and Guidelines
http://www-perscom.army.mil/tagd/sidpers3/page1.htm.
d. MILPER Messages.
http://perscomnd04.army.mil/milpermsgs.nsf
e. Army Publications and Regulations.
http://www.usapa.army.mil/
2. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES:
a. Does the PAS chief and the Dragon Master plan, direct,
control, and coordinate the PAS operation?
b. Does PAS publish memorandums of instruction about
its operations for local administrators and SIDPERS users?
c. Does the PAS systematically disseminate to users the
SIDPERS procedural updates and changes received from
PERSCOM in messages, bulletins, and other publications?
d. Does the PAS chief and Dragon Master develop
contingency plans for use during partial or full mobilizations,
civil disorder, war and natural disasters?
e. Does the PAS chief and Dragon Master manage the
SIDPERS-3 database of record (HTDS)?
f. Do the PAS chief and Dragon Master review user
procedures and directs SIDPERS-3 performance
monitoring and measuring programs to ensure accuracy
and timeliness of data?
g. Does the PAS management monitor a viable schedule
to control the flow of data to and from the PAS SIDPERS-3
database of record (HTDS)?
h. Is management constantly reviewing system input and
output queues to ensure that required processing and direct
reporting to PERSCOM comply with higher headquarters
procedures?
i. Is PAS maintaining a SIDPERS-3 Software library
including all Software Version Description documents?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
28
SIDPERS INTERFACE MANAGEMENT (PAS)
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREAS
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
4. CUSTOMER SUPPORT:
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Is the PAS System Administrator:
XXX
XXX
3. COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Are there controls in-place to monitor and manage
SIDPERS-3 data flow for external sites (TAPDB, DJMS,
ISM, ORG, TAADS, etc…?
b. Are logs being maintained of all out-going and incoming transactions?
c. Is PAS logging, filing and providing guidance for
software updates?
d. Is the PAS establishing connectivity to all sites in both
tactical and garrison environments?
a. Attempting to assist/resolve problem telephonically with
Work Center operators?
b. If the problem appears isolated to a specific transaction
type, is the PAS operator checking to see if there is
reference to this problem in the PERSCOM Error
Resolution Handbook and if so, following the recommended
course of action?
c. Recording the symptoms/problems that the user is
experiencing and actions that lead to the problems? Also
recording any visible damages to hardware that the Work
Center operator has noted?
d. Applying common solutions for similar problems that
have occurred in the past, if applicable?
e. If above checks do not resolve the problem, is the
Dragon Master and/or the PAS chief?
f. If the above procedures do not correct the problem, is
FSD contacted and diagnostic checks performed as
directed by the FSD?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
29
SIDPERS INTERFACE MANAGEMENT (PAS)
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREAS
5. TRAINING:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Note: The PAS must assess the quality of data and originator input to identify training requirements. The
Training NCO must have the tools to become knowledgeable in all areas of BNS1, G1/AG, PSB or MPD and
PAS-level procedures.
XXX
XXX
6. DATABASE MAINTENANCE AND
VERIFICATION:
XXX
XXX
Is the PAS managing and/or knowledgeable with the
following reports IAW PERSCOM procedures and regulatory
guidance:
XXX
XXX
Is the Training NCO:
a. Conducting assistance visits to BNS1 quarterly unless
the BNS1 requests additional assistance. Recommend
PAS analyst designated for the units accompany the
training NCO on the assistance visit?
b. Scheduling sustainment-training classes for SIDPERS-3
users newly assigned PSB/BDE/BNS1 clerks?
c. Scheduling classes or informational briefings for
different levels of responsibility, such as commanders,
personnel sergeants, first sergeants, and battalion
adjutants or S1s, BNS1, clerks, PAS System
Administrators, and PSB or PSC clerks and Work Center
Supervisors?
d. Facilitating cross training among PAS personnel?
e. Has the Security Automation System Manager been
appointed in writing?
f. Has the Security Automation System Manager been
provided a copy of all Type 1 & SIDPERS-3 user IDs and
date of last password change?
g. Are user accounts reviewed monthly to ensure system
security is maintained? Are passwords changed every 90
days?
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. EDAS Cycle Audit Sheet (AAA-002)?
b. TADDS Processing Error Report (Line Error) (AAA071)?
c. TAPDB Organization Change Report (AAA-080)?
d. Total Army Locator Report (AAA-083)?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
30
SIDPERS INTERFACE MANAGEMENT (PAS)
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREAS
6. DATABASE MAINTENANCE AND VERIFICATION
(Cont.):
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
e. Organization Reconciliation Report (AAA-084)?
f.
SIDPERS/TAADS Comparison (AAA-087)?
g. TAADS-R Listing (AAA-088)?
h. Authorized Strength File Listing (AAA-089)?
i. SIDPERS/TAADS Update Report (AAA-090)?
j. Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions
Management Report (AAA-095)?
k. Interface Input Transaction List (AAA-105)?
l. Interface Outlogger (AAA-107)?
m. Personnel Due to Depart Between YYYYMMDD and
YYYYMMDD (AAA-108)?
n. Unit Enlisted Advancement Report (AAA-117)?
o. Report Of AWOLs by Name (AAA-160)?
p. Unit Manning Report Position & Incumbent Data (AAA161)?
q. Unit Personnel Accountability Report (AAA-162)?
r. Unit Personnel Accountability Notices (AAA-165)?
s. E-5/E-6 Recommendation List For Promotion of
Enlisted Personnel (AAA-242)?
t.
Alpha Roster (AAA-342)?
u. Personnel Edit Report (AAA-344)?
v. External error report (AAA-351)?
w. Monitoring and resolving DJMS (JUMPS) feedback
(Part IV of AAA-351)?
x. Internal error report (AAA-650)?
y. SIDPERS-3 System Communications Configuration
Report (AAA-996)?
z. SIDPERS-3 Internal Audit Trail Report (AAA-997)?
aa. Performs Organization/Authorization maintenance?
bb. Reconciles 30 day past due notices from TAPDB?
cc. Reconciles Monthly Database Deviation Report
MA1/MA2?
dd. Reconciles all Strength Reports related with all pertinent
WCS and/or SIDPERS operators?
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
31
PERSONNEL PROCESSING - TRANSITION CENTER (TC)
The impact of improper personnel accountability results in bad accounting data, which causes under or over
funding for future budgets, denied retention due to reduction to forces based on installation strength reported
promotions and personnel distribution.
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREAS
1. REFERENCE MATERIALS:
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXX
XXX
a. FORSCOM PPET HomePage
http://www.forscom.army.mil/ppet
b. Hastily Executed Lookup Program (H.E.L.P.) SCP0409-00.
c. PERSCOM SIDPERS-3 Procedures and Guidelines
http://www-perscom.army.mil/tagd/sidpers3/page1.htm.
d. MILPER Messages.
http://perscomnd04.army.mil/milpermsgs.nsf
e. Army Publications and Regulations.
http://www.usapa.army.mil/
2. TRANSITION CENTER MANAGEMENT AND
SIDPERS CLERK:
a. Is there a listing (ADHOC Query etc.) of soldiers eligible
for potential separation?
b. Is the listing being provided to the units to verify
applicable soldiers for scheduling of initial pre-separation
briefing within 120 days of Expiration of Term Of Service
(ETS) or Retirement?
c. Are the appropriate SIDPERS transactions prepared,
submitted and processed?
d. Is the management or SIDPERS clerk coordinating with
the Units and Post Retention to resolve record status codes
of 1Q (Top of the system separation)?
e. Are there any measurement in-place to identify
shortfalls and possible need for sustainment training?
Is the TC SIDPERS clerk managing and/or knowledgeable
with the following reports IAW PERSCOM procedures and
regulatory guidance:
(1) Monthly Database Deviation Report MA1/MA2?
(2) Suspension of Favorable Personnel Actions
Management Report (AAA-095)?
(3) Personnel Edit Report (AAA-344)?
(4) Alpha Roster (AAA-342)?
(5) Unit Personnel Accountability Report (AAA-162)?
(6) Unit Personnel Accountability Notices (AAA-165)?
(7) External Error Report (AAA-351) coordinate with
PAS?
(8) Report Of AWOLs by Name (AAA-160)?
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
32
PERSONNEL PROCESSING - REPLACEMENT CENTER
In-processing welcomes and brings the individual soldier and family members on board and provides an
orderly process resulting in validation and reporting of individual soldier readiness for worldwide deployment to
the gaining commander. This is accomplished through a series of in-processing points that gather and certify
information about the soldier and his family, normally within 72 hours.
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREA
YES
1. REFERENCE MATERIALS:
XXX
NO
XXX
REMARKS
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. FORSCOM PPET HomePage
http://www.forscom.army.mil/ppet
b. Hastily Executed Lookup Program (H.E.L.P.)
SCP04-09-00.
c. PERSCOM SIDPERS-3 Procedures and Guidelines
http://www-perscom.army.mil/tagd/sidpers3/page1.htm.
d. MILPER Messages.
http://perscomnd04.army.mil/milpermsgs.nsf
e. Army Publications and Regulations.
http://www.usapa.army.mil/
2. REPLACEMENT OPERATIONS:
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
a. Are Replacement SIDPERS-3 clerks trained on
current SIDPERS-3 IAW PERSCOM procedures, Local
Policies, and all pertinent Army Regulations?
b. Are SIDPERS transactions being updated and
processed IAW AR 600-8-6 strength reporting period?
Note: The accounting period covers the 24-hour period
beginning at 000l and ending at 2400 for each calendar
day.
c. Are soldiers who go AWOL en route, properly
accounted for?
d. Are there any soldiers on the 30 days past due
report to the replacement UICs?
e. Is commander of the installation or division
replacement unit/activity ensuring that an assigned-notjoined (ASNJ) SIDPERS-3 transaction is submitted
when the soldier does not physically arrive on the report
date IAW orders?
f. Are ASNJ and DFR soldiers "clearing the installation
book”?
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
33
PERSONNEL PROCESSING - REPLACEMENT CENTER
Name, Rank:
E-Mail Address
SECTION:
AREA
2. REPLACEMENT OPERATIONS (Cont.):
YES
NO
REMARKS
XXX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
g. Is the replacement unit commander following
procedures in AR 630-10 to attempt to locate the
soldier? Note: This includes contacting the losing unit
commander, the losing installation PSB, the career
branch at PERSCOM, and unit of attachment (if TDY en
route).
h. Is the assigned-not-joined entry being followed by a
join transaction (when the soldier arrives a few days
later), an AWOL duty status transaction (when the
replacement unit commander's inquiries find no
information) and a dropped-from-rolls (DFR) transaction
30 days after the report date?
i. If the commander's inquiry finds the soldier was
diverted to another assignment (at another installation)
or attached to a unit at another installation, is the
SIDPERS-3 ASNJ entry revoked?
j. When the ASNJ action leads to DFR, is the DFR
packet assembled and forwarded to the US Army
Deserter Information Point, Indianapolis, IN 46249, DSN
699-3700?
k. Is the AAA-162 report printed (at a minimum)
weekly?
l. Does the Replacement Clerk conduct a daily
reconciliation of the AAA 162, AAA-165 and Alpha
Roster (AAA-342)?
m. Are corrective measures taken to re-synchronize the
database and all noted discrepancies researched and
corrected?
n. Are there any measurement in-place to identify
shortfalls and possible need for sustainment training?
o. Is management constantly reviewing system input to
ensure that it is IAW PERSCOM procedures and
guidelines?
REMARKS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
<BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS>
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
34
This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank.
Power Projection Enhancement Team Assessment Checklist, Dated 6 March 2016
35