Canadian Supreme Court Bias I
This study examines the distribution of cases that come before the Supreme Court of Canada, and their
outcomes. Distinctions based on issue, sex, and representation are analyzed. Data from the Canlii database
is used. All entries that fit the parameters of the study for the last 10 years are included in full. The cases
used in this study are listed in the appendixes.
Types of Appeals 1997 - 2007
Number of .
.. Cases
818
468
332
17
Total Appeals
Civil Appeals
Criminal Appeals
Family Appeals
Percent
100.0
57.3
40.6
2.1
% of Male Family Appeals = 8 / 818 x 100 = 1.0 %
Self Represented Appeals 1997 - 2007
Total Appeals
Civil Appeals
Criminal Appeals
Family Appeals
Number of .
.. Cases
3
2
1
0
Percent
0.37
0.24
0.13
0.0
% of Appeals Won by Self Represented Parties = 0 = 0 %
Family Appeals 1982 – 2007
Total Appeals
Male Appeals
Female Appeals
Number of
…..Cases
46
21
25
Number of
….. Wins
24
7
17
Self Represented Family Appeals = 0 = 0%
The Discrination Index = % Female Wins - % Male Wins = 68.0 – 33.3 = 34.3 %
Percent
… Wins
52.2
33.3
68.0
Family appeals by Issue 1982 - 2007
Appellant
Number of Males
Number of Male Wins
Appellant
Number of Females
Number of Female Wins
Custody
1
0
Access
2
1
Custody
1
1
Access
1
0
Mobility
3
1
Support
10
2
Mobility
1
0
Support
11
5
Other
6
2
Other
12
10
Summarized in percentage terms
Custody
Access
Mobility
% Chance of Male Win
% Chance of Female Win
0.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
33.3
0.0
20.0
45.5
33.3
91.6
4.3
6.4
8.5
44.6
38.2
% of Family Issues
Support
Other
Appellant
Conclusions
Family appeals comprise only 2.1 % of appeals heard at the Supreme Court over the last decade. Self
represented appeals comprised only 0.37 %. There has not been one single self represented family appeal in
the last 25 years. No self represented appellant has won an appeal in the last 10 years. Two self represented
female respondents have won in family cases in T. (M.) v. A. (H.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 445, and Leskun v.
Leskun, 2006 SCC 25. A male self represented respondent also won in a civil case in Blank v. Canada
(Minister of Justice), 2006 SCC 39 (CanLII). Males have won 33.3 % of the family appeals they have
brought before the Supreme Court. Females have won 68.0 % of their family appeals. Support and ‘ other ‘
issues were the most prevalent issues for both sexes. By far the most common ‘ other ‘ issue was property
equalization. The odds of a man bringing a family appeal before the Supreme Court are extremely low,
close to 1 %. The chances of a self represented person of either sex bringing a self represented family
appeal before the Supreme Court are apparently nonexistant. Examples of cases that appear to demonstrate
a sexual bias are portrayed in the next segment. A full list of the cases appraised in this study is given in the
appendixes following. It must be concluded that family cases comprise only a very small percent of the
total and there is a clear bias in favor of women. Self represented parties have almost no access to the
highest court.
Sexual Bias Cases
R. v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 852
Appellant, a battered woman in a volatile common law relationship, killed her partner late one night by
shooting him in the back of the head as he left her room.
I share the view expressed by Willoughby in "Rendering Each Woman Her Due: Can a Battered Woman
Claim Self-Defense When She Kills Her Sleeping Batterer" (1989), 38 Kan. L. Rev. 169, at p. 184, that
"society gains nothing, except perhaps the additional risk that the battered woman will herself be killed,
because she must wait until her abusive husband instigates another battering episode before she can
justifiably act".
R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688
The accused, an aboriginal woman, pled guilty to manslaughter for the killing of her common law husband
and was sentenced to three years' imprisonment.
She suspected the victim was having an affair with her older sister and, when her sister left the party,
followed by the victim, the accused told her friend, "He's going to get it. He's really going to get it this
time".
When the accused and the victim returned to their townhouse, they started to quarrel. During the argument,
the accused confronted the victim with his infidelity and he told her that she was fat and ugly and not as
good as the others. A few minutes later, the victim fled their home. The accused ran toward him with a
large knife and stabbed him in the chest. When returning to her home, she was heard saying "I got you, you
fucking bastard".
Held: The appeal should be dismissed.
More importantly, the accused was granted, subject to certain conditions, day parole after she had served
six months in a correctional centre and, about a year ago, was granted full parole with the same conditions.
The results of the sentence with incarceration for six months and the subsequent controlled release were in
the interests of both the accused and society.
R. v. Latimer, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 3
The accused was charged with first degree murder following the death of T, his 12-year-old daughter who
had a severe form of cerebral palsy. T was quadriplegic and her physical condition rendered her immobile.
She was said to have the mental capacity of a four-month-old baby, and could communicate only by means
of facial expressions, laughter and crying. T was completely dependent on others for her care. She suffered
five to six seizures daily, and it was thought that she experienced a great deal of pain.
After learning that the doctors wished to perform additional surgery, which he perceived as mutilation, the
accused decided to take his daughter's life. He carried T to his pickup truck, seated her in the cab, and
inserted a hose from the truck's exhaust pipe into the cab. T died from the carbon monoxide.
The trial judge explained that the Criminal Code provided only for a recommendation over the 10-year
minimum, but suggested that the jury could make any recommendation it liked. The jury recommended one
year before parole eligibility. The trial judge then granted a constitutional exemption from the mandatory
minimum sentence, sentencing the accused to one year of imprisonment and one year on probation. The
Court of Appeal dismissed.affirmed the conviction but reversed the sentence, imposing the mandatory
minimum sentence of life imprisonment without parole eligibility for 10 years.
Held: The appeals against conviction and sentence should be dismissed
Weatherall v. Canada (Attorney General), [1993] 2 S.C.R. 872
It does not follow from the fact that female prison inmates are not subject to cross-gender frisk searches
and surveillance that these practices result in discriminatory treatment of male inmates.
Given the historical, biological and sociological differences between men and women, it is clear that the
effect of cross-gender searching is different and more threatening for women than for men.
Moreover, women generally occupy a disadvantaged position in society in relation to men.
Young v Young ( 1993 )4 SCR 3
In Canada, statutes providing for equality in entitlement to custody were passed in some provinces as early
as 1923, although the process of legislative entrenchment was not completed until 1977
Moreover, research uniformly shows that men as a group have not yet embraced responsibility for
childcare. The vast majority of such labour, both before and after divorce, is still performed by women,
whether those women work outside the home or not
Frame v. Smith, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99
After their separation, the wife was granted custody, with generous visiting privileges to the husband, and
more specific orders of access were later issued. The husband maintains that his former wife did everything
in her power to frustrate his access to the children: she moved to distant cities without notification, changed
the children's surname and religion, told them that the appellant was not their father, forbade telephone
conversation with him, and intercepted his letters to them. The husband alleges he has undergone
considerable expense and has suffered severe emotional and psychic distress because of this conduct and
claims damages from respondents flowing from their wrongful interference with the legal relationship he
had with his children.
20 In sum, it is by no means certain that permitting civil actions against the custodial parents can be said to
be in the best interests of the child, whether this be by creating a tort or recognizing a fiduciary relationship
arising out of a court order. Resort even to fines and imprisonment, which is permitted by the Act, has been
described as not "entirely appropriate"; see James G. McLeod, "Annotation" to O'Byrne v. Kore (1986), 2
R.F.L. (3d) 104, at p. 105. That is because these may encroach on the resources of the custodial parent and
because the child may suffer from the knowledge that one parent has taken such drastic action against the
other.
22 No possible basis for a cause of action having been presented, I would dismiss the appeal with costs
T. (M.) v. A. (H.), [1995] 1 S.C.R. 445
2 The applicant was found to have failed to pay a sum of $25,000 on account of arrears of support
payments. Briefly, the history of the proceedings is as follows. On July 31, 1991, Bishop J. rendered
judgment against the applicant ordering payment of, inter alia, support payments. On May 7, 1992, the
applicant was found in contempt by Zerbisias J. of the Superior Court, District of Montreal, [1992] R.D.F.
386 (sub nom. Droit de la famille ‑ ‑ 1605), and sentenced to four months in prison provided that he was
to be released on payment of the sum in arrears.
I am also persuaded by the respondent that as a further condition of this order, the applicant is not to
exercise his right of access to the children of the marriage under the judgment of Bishop J. during the
period of interim release.
Thibaudeau v. Canada, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 627
, … , and (5) the status of separated or divorced custodial parents is linked to the enumerated ground of sex
given that the great majority of the members of this group are women. The distinction in s. 56(1)(b), based
on the status of separated or divorced custodial parent, is discriminatory and infringes s. 15(1) since it runs
directly counter to the values underlying it.
The respondent and the intervener SCOPE relied on the evidence in the record as showing that 98 percent
of alimony recipients are women.
The non-custodial parent, for his part, always automatically benefits from the deduction,
The logic of the deduction/inclusion scheme is further called into question by the fact that our society
strongly encourages women to attain financial self-sufficiency, and, in pursuit of that essential objective, to
increase their income.
Miglin v. Miglin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303
It is typically women who come to the bargaining table as the financially dependent spouse, and hence the
more vulnerable party in the negotiating process.
It would be perverse in the extreme to assume that Parliament's intention in enacting the Act was to
financially penalize women in this country.
Miron v. Trudel, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 418
I think it important to note at this juncture that courts and legislatures have already acknowledged that the
effect of a distinction based on marital status may be felt more severely by women than by men.
Following the lesson of Brooks, I would respectfully suggest that more is required; if we are not to
undermine the promise of equality in s. 15(1) of the Charter, we must go beyond biological differences and
examine the impact of the impugned distinction in its social and economic context to determine whether it,
in fact, perpetuates the undesirable stereotyping which s. 15(1) aims to eradicate.
M. v. H., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3
If the relationship breaks down, the woman is usually left in a worse situation, probably with impaired
earning capacity and limited employment opportunities.
First, Part III of the FLA is said to have been designed to remedy the systemic inequality associated with
opposite-sex relationships, including the economic dependence of women on men resulting from women
assuming primary responsibility for child care and from gender-based inequality in earning power.
The history of family law is, in many ways, the history of the gradual emancipation of women from legal
impediments to full equality.
Clarke v. Clarke, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 795
The Act is accordingly remedial in nature. It was designed to alleviate the inequities of the past when the
contribution made by women to the economic survival and growth of the family was not recognized. In
interpreting the provisions of the Act the purpose of the legislation must be kept in mind and the Act given
a broad and liberal construction which will give effect to that purpose.
Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980
As Lord Simon observed nearly 30 years ago: "The cock-bird can feather his nest precisely because he is
not required to spend most of his time sitting on it"
Finally, I come to the argument that, because the legislature has chosen to exclude unmarried couples from
the right to claim an interest in the matrimonial assets on the basis of contribution to the relationship, the
court should not use the equitable doctrine of unjust enrichment to remedy the situation. Again, the
argument seems flawed. It is precisely where an injustice arises without a legal remedy that equity finds a
role.
Willick v. Willick, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 670
Moreover, there are related public policy goals to consider. As recently recognized by L'Heureux-Dubé J.
in Moge v Moge ( 1992 ) 3 SCR 813 "there is no doubt that divorce and its economic effects" (p. 854) are
playing a role in the "feminization of poverty" (p. 853). A statutory interpretation which might help defeat
this role is to be preferred over one which does not. [Emphasis added.]
I most heartily agree.
Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813
The general economic impact of divorce on women, however, is a phenomenon the existence of which
cannot reasonably be questioned and should be amenable to judicial notice.
Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Walsh, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 325
After the Divorce Act, S.C. 1967-68, c. 24, was enacted in 1968, divorce became more common as a social
phenomenon. , … , In the notorious case of Murdoch v. Murdoch, [1975] 1 S.C.R. 423 (Laskin J. (as he
then was), dissenting), this Court refused to allow a wife of 25 years to obtain any interest in the property,
the title to which was held in her husband's name. All claims in equity and partnership failed. Despite one
successful attempt by this Court a few years later to redress this shameful situation, in Rathwell v. Rathwell,
[1978] 2 S.C.R. 436
Francis v. Baker, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 250
The respondent earned $63,000 per year at the date of trial. Under the terms of a separation agreement, she
also received $30,000 per year in child support payments from the appellant.
The trial judge exercised her jurisdiction under the Divorce Act to award the respondent the Table amount
of child support applicable to the appellant's income or $10,034 per month for both children.
Parliament did not choose to impose a cap or upper limit on child support payments, and the appellant has
advanced no reason why this Court should do so.
Marzetti v. Marzetti, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 765
The central issue in this appeal, as I have already noted, is whether the Trustee or the Director ( Family
Responsibility Office ) has priority in respect of Marzetti's post-bankruptcy income tax refund
Moreover, there are related public policy goals to consider. As recently recognized by L'Heureux-Dubé J.
in >Moge v. Moge, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 813, "there is no doubt that divorce and its economic effects" (p. 854)
are playing a role in the "feminization of poverty" (p. 853). A statutory interpretation which might help
defeat this role is to be preferred over one which does not.
Brooks v. Canada safeway ltd., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1219
Everyone in society benefits from procreation but one of its major costs is placed, under this plan, on one
group in society -- pregnant women.
Underinclusion may be simply a backhanded way of permitting discrimination.
Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy is discrimination on the basis of sex.
In the second part of this judgment I state that this disadvantage can be viewed as a disadvantage suffered
by women generally.
The disfavoured treatment accorded Mrs. Brooks, Mrs. Allen and Mrs. Dixon flowed entirely from their
state of pregnancy, a condition unique to woman. They were pregnant because of their sex.
R. v. Morgentaler, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 30
Forcing a woman, by threat of criminal sanction, to carry a foetus to term unless she meets certain criteria
unrelated to her own priorities and aspirations, is a profound interference with a woman's body and thus a
violation of security of the person.
A woman's right to make that choice freely is fundamental
It is probably impossible for a man to respond
This is not, in my view, just a matter of interfering with her right to liberty in the sense (already discussed)
of her right to personal autonomy in decision-making, it is a direct interference with her physical "person"
as well.
Thus, women's needs and aspirations are only now being translated into protected rights.
Furthermore, as the Chief Justice correctly points out, at p. 56, the committee bases its decision on "criteria
entirely unrelated to [the pregnant woman's] own priorities and aspirations".
She is truly being treated as a means -- a means to an end which she does not desire but over which she has
no control. She is the passive recipient of a decision made by others as to whether her body is to be used to
nurture a new life. Can there be anything that comports less with human dignity and self-respect?
Per McIntyre and La Forest JJ. (dissenting):
Historically, there has always been a clear recognition of a public interest in the protection of the unborn
Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 S.C.R.
925,
In August 1996, the respondent was five months pregnant with her fourth child. She was addicted to glue
sniffing, which may damage the nervous system of the developing fetus. As a result of her addiction, two of
her previous children were born permanently disabled and are permanent wards of the state. On a motion
by the appellant, a superior court judge ordered that the respondent be placed in the custody of the Director
of Child and Family Services and detained in a health centre for treatment until the birth of her child. One
of the grounds for the order was the court's parens patriae jurisdiction. The superior court judge, while
acknowledging that the courts have never exercised this power on behalf of an unborn child, saw no reason
why the power should not be extended to protect unborn children. The order was later stayed and ultimately
set aside on appeal. The Court of Appeal held that the existing law of tort and of parens patriae did not
support the order and, given the difficulty and complexity entailed in extending the law to permit such an
order, the task was more appropriate for the legislature than the courts.
Held (Sopinka and Major JJ. dissenting): The appeal should be dismissed.
By contrast, extension of the parens patriae jurisdiction of the court to unborn children has the potential to
affect a much broader range of liberty interests since the court cannot make decisions for the unborn child
without inevitably making decisions for the mother herself.
Tremblay v. Daigle, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 530
Held: The appeal should be allowed.
The injunction must be set aside because the substantive rights which are alleged to support it -- the rights
accorded to a foetus or a potential father -- do not exist.
The hearing before this Court was interrupted just after the lunch recess by Mr. Bédard, counsel for Ms.
Daigle, who informed the Court that he had just learned that his client had had an abortion.
Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 S.C.R.
925,
In August 1996, the respondent was five months pregnant with her fourth child. She was addicted to glue
sniffing, which may damage the nervous system of the developing fetus. As a result of her addiction, two of
her previous children were born permanently disabled and are permanent wards of the state. On a motion
by the appellant, a superior court judge ordered that the respondent be placed in the custody of the Director
of Child and Family Services and detained in a health centre for treatment until the birth of her child. One
of the grounds for the order was the court's parens patriae jurisdiction. The superior court judge, while
acknowledging that the courts have never exercised this power on behalf of an unborn child, saw no reason
why the power should not be extended to protect unborn children. The order was later stayed and ultimately
set aside on appeal. The Court of Appeal held that the existing law of tort and of parens patriae did not
support the order and, given the difficulty and complexity entailed in extending the law to permit such an
order, the task was more appropriate for the legislature than the courts.
Held (Sopinka and Major JJ. dissenting): The appeal should be dismissed.
By contrast, extension of the parens patriae jurisdiction of the court to unborn children has the potential to
affect a much broader range of liberty interests since the court cannot make decisions for the unborn child
without inevitably making decisions for the mother herself. Such a change would not be an incremental
change but a generic change of major impact and consequence. It would seriously intrude on the rights of
women.
Trociuk v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 835
On September 5, 1997, the court recognized Mr. Trociuk as the father. In that and subsequent hearings, the
chambers judge declined to amend the birth registration forms to include the father's particulars and to
change the surnames of the triplets. The father twice requested that the Director of Vital Statistics amend
the birth registration forms to include his particulars. Both requests were refused.
44 Mr. Trociuk asks this Court to order that his particulars be included on the registration of birth and that
his children's surname be changed to Ernst-Trociuk. The amended legislation provides a procedure by
which Mr. Trociuk can apply to have his particulars included on the birth registration. That is the
appropriate means by which to achieve this end. The children are now 7 years old. This Court is not in a
position to determine whether the asked-for change of surname is in the best interests of the children and,
absent the consent of both parents, this surely must be considered before an order to change the surname
can be made. The request is therefore denied.
Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E., 2004 SCC 66
The purpose of the Public Sector Restraint Act was to reduce the women's pay below this contractual
entitlement and its intended effect was to continue to pay women less than was paid to men for work of
equal value. Passage of the Act on April 18, 1991 put women hospital workers in a worse position than
they were on April 17, 1991.
The contextual factors listed in Law lead to the conclusion that the targeting of an acquired right to pay
equity amounted to discrimination within the meaning of s. 15(1) of the Charter. First, a pre-existing
disadvantage is shown since "women's jobs" are chronically underpaid and the Act perpetuated and
reinforced the idea that women could be paid less for no reason other than the fact that they were women.
British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, [1999] 3
S.C.R. 3,
The British Columbia government established minimum physical fitness standards for its forest firefighters.
One of the standards was an aerobic standard. The claimant, a female firefighter who had in the past
performed her work satisfactorily, failed to meet the aerobic standard after four attempts and was
dismissed. The claimant's union brought a grievance on her behalf.
Held: The appeal should be allowed
The procedures adopted by the researchers who developed the aerobic standard were problematic on two
levels. , … , Second, the studies failed to distinguish the female test subjects from the male test subjects,
who constituted the majority of the sample groups.
The broader legal issue is whether the aerobic standard that led to Ms. Meiorin's dismissal unfairly excludes
women from forest firefighting jobs. Employers seeking to maintain safety may err on the side of caution
and set standards higher than are necessary for the safe performance of the work. However, if men and
women do not have an equal ability to meet the excessive standard, the effect may be to exclude qualified
female candidates from employment for no reason but their gender.
Janzen v. Platy enterprises ltd., [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1252
It strains credulity to argue that the sole factor underlying the discriminatory action was appellants' sexual
attractiveness -- a personal characteristic -- and that gender was accordingly irrelevant.
The evil to be remedied is the utilization of economic power or authority so as to restrict a woman's
guaranteed and equal access to the work-place, and all of its benefits, free from extraneous pressures
having to do with the mere fact that she is a woman.
Because they were women, the appellants were subject to a disadvantage to which no man at the restaurant
would have been subject.
Symes v. Canada, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 695
The definition of "business expense" was shaped to reflect the experience of businessmen, and the ways in
which they engaged in business. As Dorothy Smith points out in "A Peculiar Eclipsing: Women's Exclusion
From Man's Culture" (1978), 1 Women's Studies Int. Quart. 281, when only one sex is involved in defining
the ideas, rules and values in a particular domain, that one-sided standpoint comes to be seen as natural,
obvious and general. As a consequence, the male standard now frames the backdrop of assumptions against
which expenses are determined to be, or not to be, legitimate business expenses.
Native Women's Assn. of Canada v. Canada, 1994 CanLII 27 (S.C.C.)
During the constitutional reform discussions which eventually led to the Charlottetown Accord, a parallel
process of consultation took place within the Aboriginal community of Canada. The federal government
provided $10 million to fund participation of four national Aboriginal organizations: the Assembly of First
Nations ("AFN"), the Native Council of Canada ("NCC"), the Metis National Council ("MNC") and the
Inuit Tapirisat of Canada ("ITC"). The Native Women's Association of Canada ("NWAC") was specifically
not included in the funding
NWAC was concerned that their exclusion from direct funding for constitutional matters and from direct
participation in the discussions threatened the equality of Aboriginal women
The application was dismissed by the Trial Division. The Federal Court of Appeal also refused to issue an
order of prohibition.
Held: The appeal should be allowed and the declaration made by the Federal Court of Appeal should be set
aside.
Appendix 1 Family Appeals 1997 to 2007
6
2007-02-09 Dickie v. Dickie, 2007
SCC 8 (CanLII)
2006-06-21 Leskun v. Leskun,
[2006] 1 S.C.R. 920, 2006 SCC 25
(CanLII)
2006-07-31 D.B.S. v. S.R.G.;
L.J.W. v. T.A.R.; Henry v. Henry;
Hiemstra v. Hiemstra, [2006] 2
S.C.R. 231, 2006 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2005-11-10 Contino v. LeonelliContino, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 217,
2005 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2004-03-26 Hartshorne v.
Hartshorne, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 550,
2004 SCC 22 (CanLII)
2003-04-17 Miglin v. Miglin,
[2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2003 SCC 24
(CanLII)
7
2001-07-12 Boston v. Boston,
[2001] 2 S.C.R. 413, 2001 SCC 43
(CanLII
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2001-09-28 Van de Perre v.
Edwards, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014,
2001 SCC 60 (CanLII
1999-01-28 Chartier v. Chartier,
[1999] 1 S.C.R. 242, 1999 CanLII
707 (S.C.C.)
1999-03-25 Bracklow v. Bracklow,
[1999] 1 S.C.R. 420, 1999 CanLII
715 (S.C.C.)
1999-06-10 Hickey v. Hickey,
[1999] 2 S.C.R. 518, 1999 CanLII
691 (S.C.C.)
1999-07-09 Best v. Best, [1999] 2
S.C.R. 868, 1999 CanLII 700
(S.C.C.)
1999-09-16 Francis v. Baker,
[1999] 3 S.C.R. 250, 1999 CanLII
659 (S.C.C.)
1997-11-07 S. (L.) v. S. (C.),
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 1003, 1997 CanLII
298 (S.C.C.)
sex
win
...lose
description
w
w
m
l
m,
m,
w,
w
w
l
w
Court of Appeal sets off table child support, wife appeals
m
w
Court overturns separation agreement on equalization of
property, husband appeals
m
w
m
w
w
w
w
w
Wife signs separation agreement waiving spousal support
and then later requests, lower courts grant spousal
support
Wife worth 493 K gets support of 3.2 K per month from
husband now worth 7 K., judge reduces support to 1 K,
Court of Appeal raises to 2 K, husband appeals, I K
reinstated
Woman has child in affair and gets sole custody and
support, husbsband appeals and Court of Appeal gives
him and his wife custody, mother appeals and gets
custody
Non biological father cannot withdraw from relationship
with child, no one appears for husband
w
w
Wife doesn’t make efforts to become self sufficient,
retains spousal support
w
w
Wife gets support increase for inflation
m
w
Appeal Allowed on pension valuation method but
dismissed on all other issues
m
l
Wife gets guideline support of 10 K per month
w
w
Restrictions on custodial wife removed
Contempt, security, man not in country, paid over 1
million in support, imprisoned for 45 days for stopping
paying
Support, man is unemployed and must pay $ 2250 per
month, self represented respondent wife appointed
amicus curiae
Retroactive support, allowed in 2 cases disallowed in 2
cases, all 4 cases lose, court affirms power to make
retroactive awards
Appendix 2 Family Appeals 1982 to 1997
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Gordon v. Goertz, [1996] 2 S.C.R.
27
W. (V.) v. S. (D.), 1996 CanLII
192 (S.C.C.)
P. (S.) v. R. (M.), [1996] 2 S.C.R.
842
T. (M.) v. A. (H.), [1995] 1 S.C.R.
445
P. (M.) v. L.B. (G.), [1995] 4
S.C.R. 592
G. (L.) v. B. (G.), [1995] 3 S.C.R.
367
Masters v. Masters, [1994] 1
S.C.R. 883
Marzetti v. Marzetti, [1994] 2
S.C.R. 765
Willick v. Willick, [1994] 3 S.C.R.
670
Thomson v. Thomson, [1994] 3
S.C.R. 551
Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R.
980
Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3
P. (D.) v. S. (C.), [1993] 4 S.C.R.
141
T. (K.N.) v. P. (G.R.) [1992] 1
S.C.R. 210
Strang v. Strang, [1992] 2 S.C.R.
112
Rawluk v. Rawluk, [1990] 1
S.C.R. 70
Lacroix v. Valois,[1990] 2 S.C.R.
1259
Clarke v. Clarke, [1990] 2 S.C.R.
795
Elsom v. Elsom, [1989] 1 S.C.R.
1367
leblanc v. leblanc, [1988] 1 S.C.R.
217
Pelech v. Pelech, [1987] 1 S.C.R.
801
Richardson v. Richardson, [1987] 1
S.C.R. 857
sex
win
...lose
m
m
(w) M,
(l) A
(l) M
w
(w) O
m
(w) O
m
(w) M
w
(l) S
m
(l) S
Wife allowed to move to Australia with child, court
changes husbands access from Australia to Canada
Wife given custody in US court and husband has custody
in Canada, child goes with wife.
Compensatory allowance on equalization paid monthly is
decreased, woman appealsand wins
Sentenced to 4 months in prison for not paying 25 K
support, allowed to stay released until appeal is heard.
Mother moves to France with child, father gets custody
order, mother can’t be found, doesn;’t defend fathers
lower court action, files action in france. No reason to
overturn lower courts ruling
Woman denied support variance asks for interim variance
until appeal is heard, denied
No significant change from time of separation agreement
m
(l) S
Bankruptcy refund taken for support
w
(w) S
Wife gets support increased, lowered by Court of Appeal
w
(l) M
w
(w) O
Wife with custody moves from Scotland to Manitoba,
husband gets order for custody, court orders childs return
to Scotland
Constructive trust for common law wife
w
(w) O
(l) O
(l) A
m
(w) O
description
Woman with custody wins costs and financial issues,
access restrictions removed for father
Husbands access limited so he does not indoctrinate
daughter in religious beliefs
Compensatory allowance not awarded, appellants sex not
given
Man retired and gets variation, Court of Appeal changes
terms
Wife gets constructive trust
m
(w) S
m
(l) O
w
(w) S
w
(w) O
Woman gets lump sum spousal award that survives
husbasnds bankruptcy
Pension is asset for equalization
w
(w) O
Wifes share of equalization increased
w
(w) O
Husband not entitled to an equal division of property
w
(l) S
Divorce agreement upheld
w
(l) S
Separation agreement upheld
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Caron v. Caron, [1987] 1 S.C.R.
892
C.(G.) v. V.‑ F.(T.), [1987] 2
S.C.R. 244
w
(l) S
Separation agreement upheld
m
(l) C
Frame v. Smith, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 99
Derrickson v. Derrickson, [1986] 1
S.C.R. 285
Sorochan v. Sorochan, [1986] 2
S.C.R. 38
m
(l) O
Kids don’t want to live with father so custody given to
dead wifes sister
Access denial not a tort
w
(l) O
Divorce Act applies to natives in property equalization
w
(w) O
Common law wife gets constructive trust
m
(l) S O
w
(w) O
m
(l) S
Divorce Act does not supercede provincial regulations,
wife gets support and permanent exclusive possession of
home
Common law wife gets trust for operating farm with
husband
Wifes support cancelled is reinstated
Lamb v. Lamb, [1985] 1 S.C.R.
851
Beaudouin-Daigneault v. Richard,
1984 CanLII 15 (S.C.C.)
Messier v. Delage, 1983 CanLII 31
(S.C.C.)
Appendix 3 Self Represented Appeal 1997 - 2007
1
2
R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine,
2003 SCC 74 (CanLII)
Lovelace v. Ontario, 2000 SCC 37
(CanLII)
Cooper v. Canada (Human Rights
Commission), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 854
3
sex
win
...lose
m
l
m
l
m
.m
l
. l
description
Marijuana laws. Malmo-Levine self represented, Caine
represented
Casino profits not shared with natives living off the
reserve
Airline pilots, mandatory retirement, ruled Human Rights
Commission has no right to challenge constitutional
validity of Airline Act
Appendix 4 All Appeals 1997 - 2007
2007 Mar
2007-03-23
2007-03-22
2007-03-16
2007-03-15
2007-03-08
2007-03-01
Council of Canadians with Disabilities v. Via Rail Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 15 (CanLII)
Lévis (City) v. Fraternité des policiers de Lévis Inc., 2007 SCC 14 (CanLII)
Phoenix Bulk Carriers Ltd. v. Kremikovtzi Trade, 2007 SCC 13 (CanLII)
R. v. Bryan, 2007 SCC 12 (CanLII)
R. v. Spencer, 2007 SCC 11 (CanLII)
Canada (Attorney General) v. Hislop, 2007 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2007 Feb
2007-02-23 Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2007-02-09 Dickie v. Dickie, 2007 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2007-02-08 Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke, 2007 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2007-02-01 R. v. Trochym, 2007 SCC 6 (CanLII)
2007 Jan
2007-01-31 R. v. Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5 (CanLII)
2007-01-26 McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v. Syndicat des employés de
l'Hôpital général de Montréal, 2007 SCC 4 (CanLII)
2007-01-25 Double N Earthmovers Ltd. v. Edmonton (City), 2007 SCC 3 (CanLII)
2007-01-19 Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Commissioner of Customs and Revenue),
2007 SCC 2 (CanLII) 2007-01-11 Kingstreet Investments Ltd. v. New Brunswick (Finance), 2007 SCC 1
(CanLII)
2006 Jan
200601-27
200601-27
200601-26
Isidore Garon ltée v. Tremblay; Fillion et Frères (1976) inc. v. Syndicat national des employés de garage du
Québec inc., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 27, 2006 SCC 2 (CanLII)
Young v. Bella, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 108, 2006 SCC 3 (CanLII)
Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canadian Airlines International Ltd., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2006 SCC
1 (CanLII)
2006 Feb
2006-02Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Vancouver (City), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 227, 2006 SCC 5 (CanLII)
23
2006-02- ATCO Gas & Pipelines Ltd. v. Alberta (Energy & Utilities Board), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 140, 2006 SCC 4
09
(CanLII)
2006 Mar
2006-03-30 R. v. Lavigne, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 392, 2006 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2006-03-30 R. v. Chaisson, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 415, 2006 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2006-03-23 R. v. Pittiman, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 381, 2006 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2006-03-17 R. v. Hotte, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 379, 2006 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2006-03-16 Mazzei v. British Columbia (Director of Adult Forensic Psychiatric Services), [2006] 1 S.C.R.
326, 2006 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2006-03-02 Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256, 2006 SCC 6
(CanLII)
2006 Apr
2006-04-27 R. v. Rodgers, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 554, 2006 SCC 15 (CanLII)
2006-04-27 R. v. Graveline, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 609, 2006 SCC 16 (CanLII)
2006-04-21 H.J. Heinz Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 441, 2006 SCC
13 (CanLII)
2006-04-21 Tranchemontagne v. Ontario (Director, Disability Support Program), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 513,
2006 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2006-04-13 Lévis (City) v. Tétreault; Lévis (City) v. 2629-4470 Québec inc., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 420, 2006
SCC 12 (CanLII)
2006 May
2006-05-25 Placer Dome Canada Ltd. v. Ontario (Minister of Finance), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 715, 2006 SCC 20
(CanLII)
2006-05-18 Bisaillon v. Concordia University, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 666, 2006 SCC 19 (CanLII)
2006-05-05 Childs v. Desormeaux, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 643, 2006 SCC 18 (CanLII)
2006-05-04 R. v. Gagnon, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 621, 2006 SCC 17 (CanLII)
2006 June
2006-06-29 Fidler v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2006 SCC 30 (CanLII)
2006-06-23 Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 1027, 2006 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2006-06-22 R. v. B.W.P.; R. v. B.V.N., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 941, 2006 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2006-06-22 Buschau v. Rogers Communications Inc., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 973, 2006 SCC 28 (CanLII)
2006-06-21 Leskun v. Leskun, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 920, 2006 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2006-06-21 R. v. Pham, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 940, 2006 SCC 26 (CanLII)
2006-06-09 Canada 3000 Inc., Re; Inter-Canadian (1991) Inc. (Trustee of), [2006] 1 S.C.R. 865, 2006 SCC
24 (CanLII)
2006-06-02 Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., [2006] 1 S.C.R. 772, 2006 SCC 22 (CanLII)
2006-06-02 Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin v. Boutiques Cliquot Ltée, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 824, 2006 SCC 23
(CanLII)
2006-06-01 Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 744,
2006 SCC 21 (CanLII)
2006 July
2006-07-31 D.B.S. v. S.R.G.; L.J.W. v. T.A.R.; Henry v. Henry; Hiemstra v. Hiemstra, [2006] 2 S.C.R.
231, 2006 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2006-07-27 GMAC Commercial Credit Corporation - Canada v. T.C.T. Logistics Inc., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 123,
2006 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2006-07-27 Celanese Canada Inc. v. Murray Demolition Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 189, 2006 SCC 36
(CanLII)
2006-07-21 United States of America v. Ferras; United States of America v. Latty, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 77,
2006 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2006-07-21 United Mexican States v. Ortega; United States of America v. Fiessel, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 120,
2006 SCC 34 (CanLII)
2006-07-13 R. v. Boulanger, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 49, 2006 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2006-07-10 Baier v. Alberta, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 311, 2006 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2006-07-07 Goodis v. Ontario (Ministry of Correctional Services), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 32, 2006 SCC 31
(CanLII)
2006 Aug
2006 Sept
2006-09-08 Blank v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 319, 2006 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2006-09-08 R. v. Kong, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 347, 2006 SCC 40 (CanLII)
2006 Oct
2006-10-26 R. v. Krieger, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 501, 2006 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2006-10-26 Pharmascience Inc. v. Binet, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 513, 2006 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2006-10-20 Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Canada; Inco Ltd. v. Canada, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 447, 2006 SCC 46 (CanLII)
2006-10-13 R. v. Shoker, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 399, 2006 SCC 44 (CanLII)
2006-10-13 Walker v. Ritchie, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 428, 2006 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2006-10-12 Robertson v. Thomson Corp., [2006] 2 S.C.R. 363, 2006 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2006-10-05 Isen v. Simms, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 349, 2006 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2006-10-05 R. v. Hazout, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 361, 2006 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2006 Nov
200611-23
200611-17
200611-16
200611-09
200611-03
R. v. Déry, 2006 SCC 53 (CanLII)
Pro Swing Inc. v. Elta Golf Inc., 2006 SCC 52 (CanLII)
R. D. v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2006 SCC 51 (CanLII)
Fédération des producteurs acéricoles du Québec v. Regroupement pour la commercialisation des produits
de l'érable inc., 2006 SCC 50 (CanLII)
AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2006] 2 S.C.R. 560, 2006 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2006 Dec
2006-12-21 R. v. Morris, 2006 SCC 59 (CanLII)
2006-12-15 McDiarmid Lumber Ltd. v. God's Lake First Nation, 2006 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2006-12-14 R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2006-12-08 R. v. Angelillo, 2006 SCC 55 (CanLII)
2006-12-08 R. v. Larche, 2006 SCC 56 (CanLII)
2006-12-07 R. v. Sappier; R. v. Gray, 2006 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2005 Jan
2005-01R. v. Clark, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 6, 2005 SCC 2 (CanLII)
27
2005-01R. v. Roberts, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 22, 2005 SCC 3 (CanLII)
27
2005-01R. v. Ménard, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 24, 2005 SCC 4 (CanLII)
27
2005-01R. v. Grandinetti, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 27, 2005 SCC 5 (CanLII)
27
2005-01- British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. British Columbia (Environmental Appeal Board), [2005]
20
1 S.C.R. 3, 2005 SCC 1 (CanLII)
2005 Feb
2005-02-25
2005-02-25
2005-02-24
2005-02-24
Tsiaprailis v. Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 113, 2005 SCC 8 (CanLII)
R. v. Decorte, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 133, 2005 SCC 9 (CanLII)
Marche v. Halifax Insurance Co., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 47, 2005 SCC 6 (CanLII)
R. v. Krymowski, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 101, 2005 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2005 Mar
2005-03-31 Solski (Tutor of) v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 201, 2005 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2005-03-31 Gosselin (Tutor of) v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 238, 2005 SCC 15 (CanLII)
2005-03-31 Okwuobi v. Lester B. Pearson School Board; Casimir v. Quebec (Attorney General); Zorrilla v.
Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 257, 2005 SCC 16 (CanLII)
2005-03-24 Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 286, 2005 SCC 17
(CanLII)
2005-03-18 Vaughan v. Canada, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 146, 2005 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2005-03-18 Nova Scotia (Minister of Health) v. J.J., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 177, 2005 SCC 12 (CanLII)
2005-03-18 Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 188, 2005 SCC 13
(CanLII)
2005-03-17 UL Canada Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 143, 2005 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2005 Apr
2005-04-29 H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401, 2005 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2005-04-27 R. v. Mapara, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 358, 2005 SCC 23 (CanLII)
2005-04-27 R. v. Chow, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 384, 2005 SCC 24 (CanLII)
2005-04-22 R. v. Paice, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2005 SCC 22 (CanLII)
2005-04-21 Fédération des producteurs de volailles du Québec v. Pelland, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 292, 2005 SCC
20 (CanLII)
2005-04-21 Gladstone v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 325, 2005 SCC 21 (CanLII)
2005-04-19 R. v. P.E.C., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 290, 2005 SCC 19 (CanLII)
2005-04-14 R. v. R.G.L., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 288, 2005 SCC 18 (CanLII)
2005 May
2005-05-25 Janssen-Ortho Inc. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 776, 2005 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2005-05-20 Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667, 2005 SCC 30 (CanLII)
2005-05-20 Glegg v. Smith & Nephew Inc., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 724, 2005 SCC 31 (CanLII)
2005-05-20 R. v. Fice, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 742, 2005 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2005-05-19 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 533, 2005 SCC 26
(CanLII)
2005-05-19 R. v. Gunning, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 627, 2005 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2005-05-19 Prebushewski v. Dodge City Auto (1984) Ltd., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 649, 2005 SCC 28 (CanLII)
2005-05-19 R. v. Dionne, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 665, 2005 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2005 June
2005-06-29 Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. v. Ontario, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 188, 2005 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2005-06-29 R. v. Woods, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 205, 2005 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2005-06-28 Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 91, 2005 SCC
39 (CanLII)
2005-06-28 Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 100, 2005
SCC 40 (CanLII)
2005-06-16 R. v. Orbanski; R. v. Elias, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2005 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2005-06-16 Ryan v. Moore, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 53, 2005 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2005-06-10 R. v. Stender, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 914, 2005 SCC 36 (CanLII)
2005-06-09 Royal Bank of Canada v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., [2005] 1 S.C.R. 779, 2005 SCC 34
(CanLII)
2005-06-09 Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 1 S.C.R. 791, 2005 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2005 July
2005-07-29 R. v. Hamilton, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 432, 2005 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2005-07-22 Provincial Court Judges' Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice);
Ontario Judges' Assn. v. Ontario (Management Board); Bodner v. Alberta; Conférence des juges du Québec
v. Quebec (Attorney General); Minc v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 286, 2005 SCC 44
(CanLII)
2005-07-22 R. v. G.R., [2005] 2 S.C.R. 371, 2005 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2005-07-22 GreCon Dimter inc. v. J. R. Normand inc., [2005] 2 S.C.R. 401, 2005 SCC 46 (CanLII) 200507-20 R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220, 2005 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2005 Aug
2005-08-18 R. v. Roberge, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 469, 2005 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2005 Sept
2005-09-30 R. v. Turcotte, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 519, 2005 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2005-09-30 Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration); Esteban v. Canada (Minister
of Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 539, 2005 SCC 51 (CanLII)
2005-09-29 British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., [2005] 2 S.C.R. 473, 2005 SCC 49
(CanLII)
2005 Oct
2005-10-28 E.B. v. Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia, [2005] 3
S.C.R. 45, 2005 SCC 60 (CanLII)
2005-10-28 R. v. R.C., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 99, 2005 SCC 61 (CanLII)
2005-10-27 Conférence des juges du Québec v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 3 S.C.R. 41, 2005 SCC
59 (CanLII)
2005-10-21 Hilewitz v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration); De Jong v. Canada (Minister of
Citizenship and Immigration), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 706, 2005 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2005-10-21 Blackwater v. Plint, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2005 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2005-10-20 Reference re Employment Insurance Act (Can.), ss. 22 and 23, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 669, 2005 SCC
56 (CanLII)
2005-10-19 Canada Trustco Mortgage Co. v. Canada, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601, 2005 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2005-10-19 Mathew v. Canada, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 643, 2005 SCC 55 (CanLII)
2005-10-12 Moufarrège v. Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 598, 2005 SCC 53
(CanLII)
2005-10-06 D.I.M.S. Construction inc. (Trustee of) v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 2 S.C.R. 564,
2005 SCC 52 (CanLII)
2005 Nov
2005-11-24 Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage), [2005] 3 S.C.R. 388,
2005 SCC 69 (CanLII)
2005-11-24 Merk v. International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron
Workers, Local 771, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 425, 2005 SCC 70 (CanLII)
2005-11-18 R. v. Escobar-Benavidez, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 386, 2005 SCC 68 (CanLII)
2005-11-17 Kirkbi AG v. Ritvik Holdings Inc., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 302, 2005 SCC 65 (CanLII)
2005-11-17 R. v. Pires; R. v. Lising, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343, 2005 SCC 66 (CanLII)
005-11-17 R. v. Rodrigue, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 384, 2005 SCC 67 (CanLII)
2005-11-10 Contino v. Leonelli-Contino, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 217, 2005 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2005-11-10 Boucher v. Stelco Inc., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 279, 2005 SCC 64 (CanLII)
2005-11-03 Montréal (City) v. 2952-1366 Québec Inc., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 141, 2005 SCC 62 (CanLII)
2005 Dec
2005-12-22 Edgar Richard Goforth v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2005 CanLII 55894 (S.C.C.)
2005-12-22 Edgar Richard Goforth c. Sa Majesté la Reine, 2005 CanLII 55895 (C.S.C.)
2005-12-22 May v. Ferndale Institution, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809, 2005 SCC 82 (CanLII)
2005-12-22 Castillo v. Castillo, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 870, 2005 SCC 83 (CanLII)
2005-12-22 R. v. Wiles, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 895, 2005 SCC 84 (CanLII)
2005-12-21 R. v. Labaye, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 728, 2005 SCC 80 (CanLII)
2005-12-21 R. v. Kouri, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 789, 2005 SCC 81 (CanLII)
2005-12-19 Forum des maires de la Péninsule acadienne v. Canada (Food Inspection Agency), [2005] 3
S.C.R. 906, 2005 SCC 85 (CanLII)
2005-12-16 Zenner v. Prince Edward Island College of Optometrists, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 645, 2005 SCC 77
(CanLII)
2005-12-16 R. v. C.D.; R. v. C.D.K., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 668, 2005 SCC 78 (CanLII)
2005-12-15 Charlebois v. Saint John (City), [2005] 3 S.C.R. 563, 2005 SCC 74 (CanLII)
2005-12-15 R. v. Henry, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, 2005 SCC 76 (CanLII)
2005-12-15 R. v. MacKay, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725, 2005 SCC 79 (CanLII)
2005-12-14 R. v. MacKay, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 607, 2005 SCC 75 (CanLII)
2005-12-02 R. v. Spence, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 458, 2005 SCC 71 (CanLII)
2005-12-02 R. v. Boucher, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499, 2005 SCC 72 (CanLII)
2005-12-02 Dikranian v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2005] 3 S.C.R. 530, 2005 SCC 73 (CanLII)
2004 Jan
2004-01-30 Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1
S.C.R. 76, 2004 SCC 4 (CanLII)
2004-01-29 Giguère v. Chambre des notaires du Québec, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2004 SCC 1 (CanLII)
2004-01-29 I.A.T.S.E., Stage Local 56 v. Société de la Place des Arts de Montréal, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 43,
2004 SCC 2 (CanLII) 2004-01-29 Crystalline Investments Ltd. v. Domgroup Ltd., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 60,
2004 SCC 3 (CanLII)
2004-01-20 Vann Niagara Ltd. v. Oakville (Town), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 158, 2003 SCC 65 (CanLII)
2004 Feb
2004-0219
2004-0219
2004-0219
2004-0219
2004-0217
2004-0212
2004-0212
2004-0212
Townsend v. Kroppmanns, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 315, 2004 SCC 10 (CanLII)
R. v. Kehler, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 328, 2004 SCC 11 (CanLII)
C.U. v. Alberta (Director of Child Welfare), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 336, 2004 SCC 12 (CanLII)
Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2004 SCC 9 (CanLII)
9050-3400 Québec Inc. v. Riverin, Girard & Associés Inc., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 301, 2004 SCC 8 (CanLII)
R. v. Lyttle, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 193, 2004 SCC 5 (CanLII)
R. v. Daoust, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 217, 2004 SCC 6 (CanLII)
Transport North American Express Inc. v. New Solutions Financial Corp., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 249, 2004
SCC 7 (CanLII)
2004 Mar
2004-03-26 Penetanguishene Mental Health Centre v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 498,
2004 SCC 20 (CanLII)
2004-03-26 Pinet v. St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 528, 2004 SCC 21 (CanLII)
2004-03-26 Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 550, 2004 SCC 22 (CanLII)
2004-03-25 John Doe v. Bennett, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 436, 2004 SCC 17 (CanLII)
2004-03-25 Foster Wheeler Power Co. v. Société intermunicipale de gestion et d'élimination des déchets
(SIGED) inc., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 456, 2004 SCC 18 (CanLII)
2004-03-25 United Taxi Drivers' Fellowship of Southern Alberta v. Calgary (City), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 485,
2004 SCC 19 (CanLII)
2004-03-19 R. v. Cheddesingh, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 433, 2004 SCC 16 (CanLII)
2004-03-04 CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 339, 2004 SCC 13
(CanLII)
2004-03-04 R. v. Smith, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 385, 2004 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2004-03-04 Gifford v. Canada, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 411, 2004 SCC 15 (CanLII)
2004 Apr
2004-04-29 Alberta Union of Provincial Employees v. Lethbridge Community College, [2004] 1 S.C.R.
727, 2004 SCC 28 (CanLII)
2004-04-22 Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629, 2004 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2004-04-22 Cartaway Resources Corp. (Re), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 672, 2004 SCC 26 (CanLII)
2004-04-22 R. v. Fontaine, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 702, 2004 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2004-04-19 R. v. Lohrer, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 627, 2004 SCC 24 (CanLII)
2004-04-08 Voice Construction Ltd. v. Construction & General Workers' Union, Local 92, [2004] 1 S.C.R.
609, 2004 SCC 23 (CanLII)
2004 May
2004-05-21 Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Schmeiser, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004 SCC 34 (CanLII)
2004-05-18 Harper v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 827, 2004 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2004-05-14 Bank of Nova Scotia v. Thibault, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 758, 2004 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2004-05-14 Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Communauté
urbaine de Montréal, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 789, 2004 SCC 30 (CanLII)
2004-05-14 Pritchard v. Ontario (Human Right Commission), [2004] 1 S.C.R. 809, 2004 SCC 31 (CanLII)
2004-05-14 Nutribec Ltée v. Quebec (Commission d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles), [2004] 1
S.C.R. 824, 2004 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2004 Apr
2004-06-30 Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Assn. of Internet
Providers, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 427, 2004 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2004-06-30 R. v. Demers, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 489, 2004 SCC 46 (CanLII)
2004-06-30 Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 551, 2004 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2004-06-30 Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de St-Jérôme-Lafontaine v. Lafontaine (Village), [2004]
2 S.C.R. 650, 2004 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2004-06-23 Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 248, 2004 SCC 42
(CanLII)
2004-06-23 Vancouver Sun (Re), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 332, 2004 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2004-06-23 R. v. Kerr, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 371, 2004 SCC 44 (CanLII)
2004-06-18 R. v. Rémillard, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 246, 2004 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2004-06-11 British Columbia v. Canadian Forest Products Ltd., [2004] 2 S.C.R. 74, 2004 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2004-06-11 Quebec (Commission des droits de la pesonne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Quebec (Attorney
General), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 185, 2004 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2004-06-11 Quebec (Attorney General) v. Quebec (Human Rights Tribunal), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 223, 2004
SCC 40 (CanLII)
2004-06-10 Bibaud v. Québec (Régie de l'assurance maladie), [2004] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2004 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2004-06-10 Finney v. Barreau du Québec, [2004] 2 S.C.R. 17, 2004 SCC 36 (CanLII)
2004-06-10 Banque nationale de Paris (Canada) v. 165836 Canada Inc., [2004] 2 S.C.R. 45, 2004 SCC 37
(CanLII)
2004 July
2004-07-29 Gilles E. Néron Communication Marketing Inc. v. Chambre des notaires du Québec, [2004] 3
S.C.R. 95, 2004 SCC 53 (CanLII)
2004-07-29 Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Ontario (Superintendent of Financial Services), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 152,
2004 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2004-07-29 Cabiakman v. Industrial Alliance Life Insurance Co., [2004] 3 S.C.R. 195, 2004 SCC 55
(CanLII)
2004-07-23 R. v. Mann, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 59, 2004 SCC 52 (CanLII)
2004-07-16 Anderson v. Amoco Canada Oil and Gas, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2004 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2004-07-16 R. v. Raponi, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 35, 2004 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2004-07-16 Nova Scotia Power Inc. v. Canada, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 53, 2004 SCC 51 (CanLII)
2004 Aug
2004 Sept
2004-09-30 R. v. Perrier, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 228, 2004 SCC 56 (CanLII)
2004-09-30 R. v. Chan, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 245, 2004 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2004-09-30 Côté v. Rancourt, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 248, 2004 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2004 Oct
2004-1029
2004-1029
2004-1029
2004-1028
2004-1028
2004-1028
2004-1028
2004-1014
2004-1001
2004-1001
2004-1001
2004-1001
R. v. Tessling, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432, 2004 SCC 67 (CanLII)
Peoples Department Stores Inc. (Trustee of) v. Wise, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 461, 2004 SCC 68 (CanLII)
R. v. Blake, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 503, 2004 SCC 69 (CanLII)
Lefebvre (Trustee of); Tremblay (Trustee of), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 326, 2004 SCC 63 (CanLII)
Ouellet (Trustee of), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 348, 2004 SCC 64 (CanLII)
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 357, 2004 SCC 65
(CanLII)
Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E., [2004] 3 S.C.R. 381, 2004 SCC 66 (CanLII)
Martineau v. M.N.R., [2004] 3 S.C.R. 737, 2004 SCC 81 (CanLII)
Épiciers Unis Métro-Richelieu Inc., division "Éconogros" v. Collin, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 257, 2004 SCC 59
(CanLII)
Glykis v. Hydro-Québec, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 285, 2004 SCC 60 (CanLII)
Entreprises Sibeca Inc. v. Frelighsburg (Municipality), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 304, 2004 SCC 61 (CanLII)
Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 323, 2004 SCC 62
(CanLII)
2004 Nov
2004-11-19 Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 575, 2004 SCC 75
(CanLII)
2004-11-19 R. v. Deschamplain, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 601, 2004 SCC 76 (CanLII)
2004-11-19 R. v. Sazant, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 635, 2004 SCC 77 (CanLII)
2004-11-19 Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 657,
2004 SCC 78 (CanLII)
2004-11-18 Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511, 2004 SCC 73
(CanLII)
2004-11-18 Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), [2004] 3
S.C.R. 550, 2004 SCC 74 (CanLII)
2004-11-12 R. v. Smith, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 507, 2004 SCC 71 (CanLII)
2004-11-12 R. v. Zurowski, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 509, 2004 SCC 72 (CanLII)
2004-11-05 R. v. Saunders, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 505, 2004 SCC 70 (CanLII)
2004 Dec
2004-12-10 R. v. Lohrer, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732, 2004 SCC 80 (CanLII)
2004-12-10 UL Canada Inc. v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2004] 3 S.C.R. 760, 2004 SCC 82 (CanLII)
2004-12-09 Reference re Same-Sex Marriage, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 698, 2004 SCC 79 (CanLII)
2003 Jan
2003-01-30 Siemens v. Manitoba (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 6, 2003 SCC 3 (CanLII)
2003-01-21 R. v. Wise, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2003 SCC 1 (CanLII)
2003-01-21 R. v. Pelletier, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 4, 2003 SCC 2 (CanLII)
2003 Feb
2003-02-20
2003-02-20
2003-02-11
2003-02-11
R. v. Zinck, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 41, 2003 SCC 6 (CanLII)
R. v. Feeley, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 64, 2003 SCC 7 (CanLII)
R. v. R.R., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 37, 2003 SCC 4 (CanLII)
R. v. Harriott, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 39, 2003 SCC 5 (CanLII)
2003 Mar
2003-03-21 Martin v. American International Assurance Life Co., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 158, 2003 SCC 16
(CanLII)
2003-03-21 Desputeaux v. Éditions Chouette (1987) inc., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 178, 2003 SCC 17 (CanLII)
2003-03-21 R. v. Allen, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 223, 2003 SCC 18 (CanLII)
2003-03-20 Allen v. Alberta, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 128, 2003 SCC 13 (CanLII)
2003-03-20 Goudie v. Ottawa (City), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 141, 2003 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2003-03-20 R. v. Knight; R. v. Hay, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 156, 2003 SCC 15 (CanLII)
2003-03-14 R. v. Willis, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 127, 2003 SCC 12 (CanLII)
2003-03-13 R. v. M.S., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 125, 2003 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2003-03-11 Reference re Earth Future Lottery, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 123, 2003 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2003-03-06 Canada (Information Commissioner) v. Canada (Commissioner of the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 66, 2003 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2003-03-06 Markevich v. Canada, 2003 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2003 Apr
2003-04-17 R. v. Arradi, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 280, 2003 SCC 23 (CanLII)
2003-04-17 Miglin v. Miglin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 303, 2003 SCC 24 (CanLII)
2003-04-14 R. v. P.A., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 275, 2003 SCC 21 (CanLII)
2003-04-14 R. v. Larue, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 277, 2003 SCC 22 (CanLII)
2003-04-03 Dr. Q. v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 226, 2003
SCC 19 (CanLII)
2003-04-03 Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 247, 2003 SCC 20 (CanLII)
2003 May
2003-0516
2003-0516
2003-0501
2003-0501
2003-0501
Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 476, 2003 SCC 28 (CanLII)
C.U.P.E. v. Ontario (Minister of Labour), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539, 2003 SCC 29 (CanLII)
KP Pacific Holdings Ltd. v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 433, 2003 SCC 25
(CanLII)
Churchland v. Gore Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 445, 2003 SCC 26 (CanLII)
Z.I. Pompey Industrie v. ECU-Line N.V., [2003] 1 S.C.R. 450, 2003 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2003 June
2003-06-27 Figueroa v. Canada (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 912, 2003 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2003-06-26 Ell v. Alberta, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 857, 2003 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2003-06-26 Bell Canada v. Canadian Telephone Employees Association, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 884, 2003 SCC
36 (CanLII)
2003-06-06 Starson v. Swayze, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 722, 2003 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2003-06-06 R. v. Owen, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 779, 2003 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2003-06-06 Trociul v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [2003] 1 S.C.R. 835, 2003 SCC 34 (CanLII)
2003-06-05 R. v. Buhay, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 631, 2003 SCC 30 (CanLII)
2003-06-05 Caisse populaire Desjardins de Val-Brillant v. Blouin, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 666, 2003 SCC 31
(CanLII)
2003 July
2003-07-17 Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 40, 2003 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2003-07-17 Unifund Assurance Co. v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 63, 2003 SCC
40 (CanLII)
2003-07-11 R. v. Asante-Mensah, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2003 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2003 Aug
2003 Sept
2003-09-26 Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, 2003 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2003-09-26 R. v. Johnson, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 357, 2003 SCC 46 (CanLII)
2003-09-26 R. v. Edgar, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 388, 2003 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2003-09-26 R. v. Smith, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 392, 2003 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2003-09-26 R. v. Mitchell, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 396, 2003 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2003-09-26 R. v. Kelly, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 400, 2003 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2003-09-19 R. v. Powley, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 207, 2003 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2003-09-19 R. v. Blais, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 236, 2003 SCC 44 (CanLII)
2003-09-18 R. v. Williams, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 134, 2003 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2003-09-18 ParrySound (District) Social Services Administration Board v. O.P.S.E.U., Local 324, [2003] 2
S.C.R. 157, 2003 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2003 Oct
200310-31
200310-31
200310-30
200310-30
200310-17
200310-07
200310-03
200310-03
200310-02
200310-02
200310-02
R. v. S.A.B., [2003] 2 S.C.R. 678, 2003 SCC 60 (CanLII)
Deloitte & Touche LLP v. Ontario (Securities Commission), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 713, 2003 SCC 61 (CanLII)
Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Quebec (Minister of the Environment), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 624, 2003 SCC 58 (CanLII)
Gurniak v. Nordquist, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 652, 2003 SCC 59 (CanLII)
R. v. Phillips, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 623, 2003 SCC 57 (CanLII)
R. v. Bédard, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 621, 2003 SCC 56 (CanLII)
Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v.
Laseur, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 504, 2003 SCC 54 (CanLII)
Paul v. British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission), [2003] 2 S.C.R. 585, 2003 SCC 55 (CanLII)
K.L.B. v. British Columbia, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403, 2003 SCC 51 (CanLII)
E.D.G. v. Hammer, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 459, 2003 SCC 52 (CanLII)
M.B. v. British Columbia, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 477, 2003 SCC 53 (CanLII)
2003 Nov
2003-11-14 National Trust Co. v. H & R Block Canada Inc., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 160, 2003 SCC 66 (CanLII)
2003-11-14 Maranda v. Richer, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 193, 2003 SCC 67 (CanLII)
2003-11-14 Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Maksteel Québec
Inc., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 228, 2003 SCC 68 (CanLII)
2003-11-06 Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2003 SCC 62
(CanLII)
2003-11-06 Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 77, 2003 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2003-11-06 Ontario v. O.P.S.E.U., [2003] 3 S.C.R. 149, 2003 SCC 64 (CanLII)
2003 Dec
2003-12-23 R. v. Malmo-Levine; R. v. Caine, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571, 2003 SCC 74 (CanLII)
2003-12-23 R. v. Clay, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 735, 2003 SCC 75 (CanLII)
2003-12-18 Beals v. Saldanha, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 416, 2003 SCC 72 (CanLII)
2003-12-18 R. v. Wu, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 530, 2003 SCC 73 (CanLII)
2003-12-12 R. v. Taillefer; R. v. Duguay, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 307, 2003 SCC 70 (CanLII)
2003-12-12 British Columbia (Minister of Forests) v. Okanagan Indian Band, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 371, 2003
SCC 71 (CanLII)
2003-12-05 Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 263, 2003 SCC 69 (CanLII)
2002 Jan
2002-01-24 Bank of Montreal v. Dynex Petroleum Ltd., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 146, 2002 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2002-01-24 R.W.D.S.U., Local 558 v. Pepsi-Cola Canada Beverages (West) Ltd., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 156,
2002 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2002-01-24 Krangle (Guardian ad litem of) v. Brisco, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 205, 2002 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2002-01-18 R. v. Tessier, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 144, 2002 SCC 6 (CanLII)
2002-01-15 R. v. Benji, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 142, 2002 SCC 5 (CanLII)
2002-01-11 Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 1
(CanLII)
2002-01-11 Ahani v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 72, 2002 SCC 2
(CanLII)
2002-01-11 Chieu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 84, 2002 SCC 3
(CanLII)
2002-01-11 Al Sagban v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 133, 2002
SCC 4 (CanLII)
2002 Feb
2002-0222
2002-0222
2002-0222
2002-0221
2002-0221
2002-0221
2002-0221
2002-02-
Ward v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 569, 2002 SCC 17 (CanLII)
Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595, 2002 SCC 18 (CanLII)
Performance Industries Ltd. v. Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club Ltd., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 678, 2002 SCC 19
(CanLII)
R. v. Guignard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 472, 2002 SCC 14 (CanLII)
St-Jean v. Mercier, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 491, 2002 SCC 15 (CanLII)
R. v. Fliss, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 535, 2002 SCC 16 (CanLII)
Bannon v. Thunder Bay (City), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 716, 2002 SCC 20 (CanLII)
R. v. Regan, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297, 2002 SCC 12 (CanLII)
14
2002-0214
2002-0207
2002-0207
Mackin v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance); Rice v. New Brunswick, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 405, 2002
SCC 13 (CanLII)
R. v. Law, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 227, 2002 SCC 10 (CanLII)
Moreau-Bérubé v. New Brunswick (Judicial Council), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 249, 2002 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2002 Mar
2002-03-28 Smith v. Co-operators General Insurance Co., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 129, 2002 SCC 30 (CanLII)
2002-03-28 Kitkatla Band v. British Columbia (Minister of Small Business, Tourism and Culture), [2002] 2
S.C.R. 146, 2002 SCC 31 (CanLII)
2002-03-28 R. v. Brown, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 185, 2002 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2002-03-28 Housen v.Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 2002 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2002-03-28 Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 336, 2002 SCC 34 (CanLII)
2002-03-21 R. v. Lamy, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 860, 2002 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2002-03-21 R. v. Sheppard, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 869, 2002 SCC 26 (CanLII)
2002-03-21 R. v. Braich, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 903, 2002 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2002-03-21 Sarvanis v. Canada, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 921, 2002 SCC 28 (CanLII)
2002-03-21 R. v. Cinous, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2002-03-14 R. v. Mac, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 856, 2002 SCC 24 (CanLII)
2002-03-08 Goulet v. Transamerica Life Insurance Co. of Canada, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 719, 2002 SCC 21
(CanLII)
2002-03-08 Oldfield v. Transamerica Life Insurance Co. of Canada, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 742, 2002 SCC 22
(CanLII)
2002-03-08 Lavoie v. Canada, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 769, 2002 SCC 23 (CanLII)
2002 Apr
2002-04-26 Sierra Club of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 522, 2002 SCC 41
(CanLII)
2002-04-26 Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559, 2002 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2002-04-26 Bank of America Canada v. Mutual Trust Co., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 601, 2002 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2002-04-26 Tremblay v. Syndicat des employées et employés professionnels-les et de bureau, section
locale 57, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 627, 2002 SCC 44 (CanLII)
2002-04-25 Gronnerud (Litigation Guardians of) v. Gronnerud Estate, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 417, 2002 SCC 38
(CanLII)
2002-04-25 R. v. Hibbert, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 445, 2002 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2002-04-25 Berry v. Pulley, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 493, 2002 SCC 40 (CanLII)
2002-04-22 R. v. S.G.F., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 416, 2002 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2002-04-17 R. v. Carlos, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 411, 2002 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2002-04-17 R. v. V.C.A.S., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 414, 2002 SCC 36 (CanLII)
2002 May
2002-05-23 Stewart v. Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 645, 2002 SCC 46 (CanLII)
2002-05-23 Walls v. Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 684, 2002 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2002-05-23 Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 695, 2002 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2002-05-23 First Vancouver Finance v. M.R.N., [2002] 2 S.C.R. 720, 2002 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2002-05-23 Heredi v. Fensom, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 741, 2002 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2002-05-21 R. v. Robicheau, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 643, 2002 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2002 June
2002-06-21 R. v. Burke, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 857, 2002 SCC 55 (CanLII)
2002-06-21 R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56 (CanLII)
2002-06-20 R.C. v. Quebec (Attorney General); R. v. Beauchamps, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 762, 2002 SCC 52
(CanLII)
2002-06-20 Lavigne v. Canada (Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 773,
2002 SCC 53 (CanLII)
2002-06-20 Ross River Dena Council Band v. Canada, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 816, 2002 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2002-06-11 R. v. Perciballi, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 761, 2002 SCC 51 (CanLII)
2002 July
2002-07-18 R. v. Shearing, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 33, 2002 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2002-07-11 Babcock v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2002 Aug
2002-08-08
Somersall v. Friedman, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 109, 2002 SCC 59 (CanLII)
2002 Sept
2002-09-12 CIBC Mortgage Corp. v. Vasquez, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 168, 2002 SCC 60 (CanLII)
2002-09-12 Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz v. Canada (Attorney General); White, Ottenheimer & Baker v.
Canada (Attorney General); R. v. Fink, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 209, 2002 SCC 61 (CanLII)
2002-09-12 Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 269, 2002 SCC 62 (CanLII)
2002 Oct
2002-10-31 B. v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 403, 2002 SCC 66 (CanLII)
2002-10-31 R. v. Noël, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 433, 2002 SCC 67 (CanLII)
2002-10-31 Sauvé v. Canada (Chief Electoral Officer), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 519, 2002 SCC 68 (CanLII)
2002-10-31 R. v. Wilson, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 629, 2002 SCC 69 (CanLII)
2002-10-10 R. v. Hall, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 309, 2002 SCC 64 (CanLII)
2002-10-10 Krieger v. Law Society of Alberta, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 372, 2002 SCC 65 (CanLII)
2002-10-08 Canam Enterprises Inc. v. Coles, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 307, 2002 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2002 Nov
2002-11-21 Quebec (Attorney General) v. Laroche, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 708, 2002 SCC 72 (CanLII)
2002-11-21 R. v. Jarvis, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 757, 2002 SCC 73 (CanLII)
2002-11-21 R. v. Ling, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 814, 2002 SCC 74 (CanLII)
2002-11-21 Ruby v. Canada (Solicitor General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 75 (CanLII)
2002-11-01 R. v. Neil, [2002] 3 S.C.R. 631, 2002 SCC 70 (CanLII)
2002-11-01 Macdonell v. Quebec (Commission d'accès à l'information), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 661, 2002 SCC 71
(CanLII)
2002 Dec
2002-12-20 Prud'homme v. Prud'homme, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 663, 2002 SCC 85 (CanLII)
2002-12-20 Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710, 2002 SCC 86 (CanLII)
2002-12-19 Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v. Walsh, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 325, 2002 SCC 83 (CanLII)
2002-12-19 Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 429, 2002 SCC 84 (CanLII)
2002-12-12 373409 Alberta Ltd. (Receiver of) v. Bank of Montreal, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 312, 2002 SCC 81
(CanLII)
2002-12-12 R. v. Squires, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 323, 2002 SCC 82 (CanLII)
2002-12-11 R. v. Harvey, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 311, 2002 SCC 80 (CanLII)
2002-12-06 Spar Aerospace Ltd. v. American Mobile Satellite Corp., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 205, 2002 SCC 78
(CanLII)
2002-12-06 Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 245, 2002 SCC 79 (CanLII)
2002-12-05 Harvard College v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 45, 2002 SCC 76
(CanLII)
2002-12-05 Apotex Inc. v. Wellcome Foundation Ltd., [2002] 4 S.C.R. 153, 2002 SCC 77 (CanLII
2001 Jan
2001-01-26 R. v. Sharpe, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 45, 2001 SCC 2 (CanLII)
2001-01-26 R. v. Parrott, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 178, 2001 SCC 3 (CanLII)
2001-01-26 Ellis-Don Ltd. v. Ontario (Labour Relations Board), [2001] 1 S.C.R. 221, 2001 SCC 4 (CanLII)
2001-01-26 R. v. Deane, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 279, 2001 SCC 5 (CanLII)
2001-01-26 R. v. Ferguson, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 281, 2001 SCC 6 (CanLII)
2001-01-18 R. v. Latimer, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2001 SCC 1 (CanLII)
2001 Feb
2001-02-23 R. v. Berntson, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 365, 2001 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2001-02-21 R. v. Guttman, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 363, 2001 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2001-02-15 United States v. Burns, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283, 2001 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2001 Mar
2001-03-30 Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority Inc. v. CAW-Canada, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 644, 2001 SCC
22 (CanLII)
2001-03-16 R. v. Z.L., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 528, 2001 SCC 16 (CanLII)
2001-03-16 R. v. W.B.C., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 530, 2001 SCC 17 (CanLII)
2001-03-08 Ontario English Catholic Teachers' Assn. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2001] 1 S.C.R. 470,
2001 SCC 15 (CanLII)
2001-03-02 R. v. McClure, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 445, 2001 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2001-03-01 Backman v. Canada, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 367, 2001 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2001-03-01 Spire Freezers Ltd. v. Canada, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 391, 2001 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2001-03-01 Miller v. Canada, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 407, 2001 SCC 12 (CanLII)
2001-03-01 Miller v. Monit International Inc., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 432, 2001 SCC 13 (CanLII)
2001 Apr
2001-04-26 R. v. Rideout, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 755, 2001 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2001-04-26 R. v. Pakoo, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 757, 2001 SCC 28 (CanLII)
2001-04-20 R. v. Ruzic, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 687, 2001 SCC 24 (CanLII)
2001-04-20 R. v. Kelly, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 741, 2001 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2001-04-19 Walker Estate v. York Finch General Hospital, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 647, 2001 SCC 23 (CanLII)
2001-04-17 Westec Aerospace Inc. v. Raytheon Aircraft Company, [2001] 1 S.C.R. iv, 2001 SCC 26
(CanLII)
2001-04-05 United States of America v. Kwok, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532, 2001 SCC 18 (CanLII)
2001-04-05 United States of America v. Cobb, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 587, 2001 SCC 19 (CanLII)
2001-04-05 United States of America v. Tsioubris, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 613, 2001 SCC 20 (CanLII)
2001-04-05 United States of America v. Shulman, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616, 2001 SCC 21 (CanLII)
2001 May
2001-0524
2001-0524
2001-0524
2001-0517
2001-0517
2001-0516
R. v. Find, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 863, 2001 SCC 32 (CanLII)
Mitchell v. M.N.R., [2001] 1 S.C.R. 911, 2001 SCC 33 (CanLII)
R. v. Peters; R. v. Rendon, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 997, 2001 SCC 34 (CanLII)
R. v. Parent, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 761, 2001 SCC 30 (CanLII)
Trinity Western University v. British Columbia College of Teachers, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 772, 2001 SCC 31
(CanLII)
R. v. Dutra, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 759, 2001 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2001 June
2001-06-29 Mount Sinai Hospital Center v. Quebec (Minister of Health and Social Services), [2001] 2
S.C.R. 281, 2001 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2001-06-29 R. v. Pan; R. v. Sawyer, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 344, 2001 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2001-06-28 McKinley v. BC Tel, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 161, 2001 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2001-06-28 Noël v. Société d'énergie de la Baie James, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 207, 2001 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2001-06-28 114957 Canada Ltée (Spraytech, Société d'arrosage) v. Hudson (Town), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 241,
2001 SCC 40 (CanLII)
2001-06-07 Therrien (Re), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2001 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2001-06-07 Canada (Deputy Minister of National Revenue) v. Mattel Canada Inc., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 100,
2001 SCC 36 (CanLII)
2001-06-07 Committee for the Equal Treatment of Asbestos Minority Shareholders v. Ontario (Securities
Commission), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 132, 2001 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2001 July
2001-07-13 Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. v. Dutton, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 534, 2001 SCC 46
(CanLII)
2001-07-13 Ivanhoe inc. v. UFCW, Local 500, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 565, 2001 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2001-07-13 Sept-Îles (City) v. Quebec (Labour Court), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 670, 2001 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2001-07-12 Boston v. Boston, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 413, 2001 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2001-07-12 Danyluk v. Ainsworth Technologies Inc., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 460, 2001 SCC 44 (CanLII)
2001-07-12 Fortin v. Chrétien, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 500, 2001 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2001 Aug
2001 Sept
2001-09-28 671122 Ontario Ltd. v. Sagaz Industries Canada Inc., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 983, 2001 SCC 59
(CanLII)
2001-09-28 Van de Perre v. Edwards, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, 2001 SCC 60 (CanLII)
2001-09-28 Singleton v. Canada, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1046, 2001 SCC 61 (CanLII)
2001-09-28 Ludco Enterprises Ltd. v. Canada, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1082, 2001 SCC 62 (CanLII)
2001-09-27 Berendsen v. Ontario, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 849, 2001 SCC 55 (CanLII)
2001-09-27 R. v. Ulybel Enterprises Ltd., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 867, 2001 SCC 56 (CanLII)
2001-09-27 Saint-Romuald (City) v. Olivier, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 898, 2001 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2001-09-27 Naylor Group Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction Ltd., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 943, 2001 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2001-09-14 Ocean Port Hotel Ltd. v. British Columbia (General Manager, Liquor Control and Licensing
Branch), [2001] 2 S.C.R. 781, 2001 SCC 52 (CanLII)
2001-09-14 R. v. Russell, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 804, 2001 SCC 53 (CanLII) 2001-09-14 R.v. Arcuri, [2001] 2
S.C.R. 828, 2001 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2001-09-13 Monenco Ltd. v. Commonwealth Insurance Co., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 699, 2001 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2001-09-13 Marcoux v. Bouchard, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 726, 2001 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2001-09-13 Lac d'Amiante du Québec Ltée v. 2858-0702 Québec Inc., [2001] 2 S.C.R. 743, 2001 SCC 51
(CanLII)
2001 Oct
2001-10-19 R. v. Advance Cutting & Coring Ltd., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 209, 2001 SCC 70 (CanLII)
2001-10-19 R. v. Rhee, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 364, 2001 SCC 71 (CanLII)
2001-10-19 Derksen v. 539938 Ontario Ltd., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 398, 2001 SCC 72 (CanLII)
2001-10-18 Proulx v. Quebec (Attorney General), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 9, 2001 SCC 66 (CanLII)
2001-10-18 Law Society of British Columbia v. Mangat, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 113, 2001 SCC 67 (CanLII)
2001-10-18 Hollick v. Toronto (City), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158, 2001 SCC 68 (CanLII) 2001-10-18 Rumley v.
British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184, 2001 SCC 69 (CanLII)
2001-10-12 R. v. J.W.R., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 7, 2001 SCC 65 (CanLII)
2001-10-12 Canadian Pacific Ltd. v. Montreal Urban Community, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 426, 2001 SCC 74
(CanLII)
2001-10-11 Autobus Thomas Inc. v. Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 5, 2001 SCC 64 (CanLII)
2001-10-02 R. v. Mankwe, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 3, 2001 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2001 Nov
2001-11-16 Cooper v. Hobart, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537, 2001 SCC 79 (CanLII)
2001-11-16 Edwards v. Law Society of Upper Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 562, 2001 SCC 80 (CanLII)
2001-11-15 R. v. Jabarianha, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 430, 2001 SCC 75 (CanLII)
2001-11-15 R. v. Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442, 2001 SCC 76 (CanLII)
2001-11-15 R. v. O.N.E., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 478, 2001 SCC 77 (CanLII)
2001-11-15 R. v. Nette, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 488, 2001 SCC 78 (CanLII)
2001-11-09 R. v. Scott, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 425, 2001 SCC 73 (CanLII)
2001 Dec
2001-12-20 Holt Cargo Systems Inc. v. ABC Containerline N.V. (Trustees of), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 907, 2001
SCC 90 (CanLII)
2001-12-20 Antwerp Bulkcarriers, N.V. (Re), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 951, 2001 SCC 91 (CanLII)
2001-12-20 Sam Lévy & Associés Inc. v. Azco Mining Inc., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 978, 2001 SCC 92 (CanLII)
2001-12-20 R. v. Larivière, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1013, 2001 SCC 93 (CanLII)
2001-12-20 Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016, 2001 SCC 94 (CanLII)
2001-12-07 Osoyoos Indian Band v. Oliver (Town), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 746, 2001 SCC 85 (CanLII)
2001-12-07 R. v. Khan, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 823, 2001 SCC 86 (CanLII)
2001-12-07 Prévost-Masson v. General Trust of Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 882, 2001 SCC 87 (CanLII)
2001-12-07 Smith v. Canada (Attorney General), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 902, 2001 SCC 88 (CanLII)
2001-12-07 Privacy Act (Can.) (Re), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 905, 2001 SCC 89 (CanLII)
2001-12-06 R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575, 2001 SCC 81 (CanLII)
2001-12-06 R. v. Hynes, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623, 2001 SCC 82 (CanLII)
2001-12-06 R. v. Golden, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 679, 2001 SCC 83 (CanLII)
2001-12-05 Paul D'Aoust Construction Ltd. v. Markel Insurance Co. of Canada, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 744, 2001
SCC 84 (CanLII)
2000 Jan
2000-01-31 R. v. Proulx, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 61, 2000 SCC 5 (CanLII)
2000-01-31 R. v. L.F.W., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 132, 2000 SCC 6 (CanLII)
2000-01-31 R. v. R.N.S., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 149, 2000 SCC 7 (CanLII)
2000-01-31 R. v. R.A.R., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 163, 2000 SCC 8 (CanLII)
2000-01-31 R. v. Bunn, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 183, 2000 SCC 9 (CanLII)
2000-01-20 Kovach v. British Columbia (Workers' Compensation Board), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 55, 2000 SCC 3
(CanLII)
2000-01-20 Lindsay v. Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 59, 2000 SCC 4
(CanLII)
2000-01-14 Public School Boards' Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 44,
2000 SCC 2 (CanLII)
2000-01-13 Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3, 2000 SCC 1 (CanLII)
2000 Feb
2000-02-17 R. v. Wells, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 207, 2000 SCC 10 (CanLII)
2000-02-17 R. v. Brooks, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 237, 2000 SCC 11 (CanLII)
2000 Mar
2000-03-02 Ingles v. Tutkaluk Construction Ltd., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 298, 2000 SCC 12 (CanLII)
2000-03-02 Nanaimo (City) v. Rascal Trucking Ltd., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 342, 2000 SCC 13 (CanLII)
2000-03-02 Regina Police Assn. Inc. v. Regina (City) Board of Police Commissioners, [2000] 1 S.C.R.
360, 2000 SCC 14 (CanLII)
2000 Apr
2000-0427
2000-0427
2000-0413
2000-0413
2000-0413
2000-0413
2000-0413
2000-0413
2000-0413
R. v. G.D.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 520, 2000 SCC 22 (CanLII)
Ajax (Town) v. CAW, Local 222, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 538, 2000 SCC 23 (CanLII)
R. v. Biniaris, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 381, 2000 SCC 15 (CanLII)
R. v. Molodowic, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 420, 2000 SCC 16 (CanLII)
R. v. A.G., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 439, 2000 SCC 17 (CanLII)
R. v. Wust, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 455, 2000 SCC 18 (CanLII)
R. v. Arthurs, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 481, 2000 SCC 19 (CanLII)
R. v. Arrance, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 488, 2000 SCC 20 (CanLII)
Global Securities Corp. v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 494, 2000 SCC 21
(CanLII)
2000 May
2000-05-18 Granovsky v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 703, 2000
SCC 28 (CanLII)
2000-05-18 R. v. Jolivet, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751, 2000 SCC 29 (CanLII)
2000-05-03 Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v. Scalera, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 551, 2000 SCC 24
(CanLII)
2000-05-03 Sansalone v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 627, 2000 SCC 25 (CanLII)
2000-05-03 Laflamme v. Prudential-Bache Commodities Canada Ltd., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 638, 2000 SCC 26
(CanLII)
2000-05-03 Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Montréal (City);
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Boisbriand (City), [2000] 1
S.C.R. 665, 2000 SCC 27 (CanLII)
2000 June
2000-06-22 R. v. Khan, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 915, 2000 SCC 63 (CanLII)
2000-06-15 Reference re Firearms Act (Can.), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 783, 2000 SCC 31 (CanLII)
2000-06-15 Reference re Gruenke, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 836, 2000 SCC 32 (CanLII)
2000-06-15 R. v. Cacheway, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 838, 2000 SCC 33 (CanLII)
2000-06-13 R. v. A.R.B., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 781, 2000 SCC 30 (CanLII
2000 July
2000-07-20 Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842, 2000 SCC 34
(CanLII)
2000-07-20 F.N. (Re), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 880, 2000 SCC 35 (CanLII)
2000-07-20 Will-Kare Paving & Contracting Ltd. v. Canada, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 915, 2000 SCC 36 (CanLII)
2000-07-20 Lovelace v. Ontario, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950, 2000 SCC 37 (CanLII)
2000 Aug
2000 Sept
2000-09-29 R. v. Oickle, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 3, 2000 SCC 38 (CanLII)
2000-09-29 R. v. Morrisey, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 90, 2000 SCC 39 (CanLII)
2000-09-29 R. v. Starr, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144, 2000 SCC 40 (CanLII)
2000 Oct
2000-10-13 Winnipeg Child and Family Services v. K.L.W., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 519, 2000 SCC 48 (CanLII)
2000-10-13 R. v. M.O., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 594, 2000 SCC 49 (CanLII)
2000-10-12 R. v. Darrach, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 443, 2000 SCC 46 (CanLII)
2000-10-12 R. v. Lévesque, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 487, 2000 SCC 47 (CanLII)
2000-10-06 Public School Boards' Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 409,
2000 SCC 45 (CanLII)
2000-10-05 R. v. D.D., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 275, 2000 SCC 43 (CanLII)
2000-10-05 Blencoe v. British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 307, 2000 SCC 44
(CanLII)
2000-10-04 R. v. Caouette, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 271, 2000 SCC 41 (CanLII)
2000-10-04 R. v. Hamelin, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 273, 2000 SCC 42 (CanLII)
2000 Nov
2000-11-30 Martel building Ltd. v. Canada, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860, 2000 SCC 60 (CanLII)
2000-11-16 R. v. Knoblauch, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 780, 2000 SCC 58 (CanLII)
2000-11-10 R. v. Charlebois, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 674, 2000 SCC 53 (CanLII)
2000-11-10 R. v. Beauchamp, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 720, 2000 SCC 54 (CanLII)
2000-11-10 R. v. Russell, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 731, 2000 SCC 55 (CanLII)
2000-11-10 R. v. Avetysan, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 745, 2000 SCC 56 (CanLII)
2000-11-10 Harper v. Canada (Attorney General), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 764, 2000 SCC 57 (CanLII)
2000-11-09 R. v. Sutton, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 595, 2000 SCC 50 (CanLII)
2000-11-09 R. v. J.-L.J., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 600, 2000 SCC 51 (CanLII)
2000-11-09 Musqueam Indian Band v. Glass, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 633, 2000 SCC 52 (CanLII)
2000-11-02 R. v. N.M.P., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 857, 2000 SCC 59 (CanLII)
2000 Dec
2000-12-15 Free World Trust v. Électro Santé Inc., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1024, 2000 SCC 66 (CanLII)
2000-12-15 Whirlpool Corp. v. Camco Inc., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1067, 2000 SCC 67 (CanLII)
2000-12-15 Whirlpool Corp. v. Maytag Corp., [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1116, 2000 SCC 68 (CanLII)
2000-12-15 Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 1120,
2000 SCC 69 (CanLII)
2000-12-14 Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. Victoria (City), [2000] 2 S.C.R. 919, 2000 SCC 64
(CanLII)
2000-12-14 R. v. Araujo, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 992, 2000 SCC 65 (CanLII)
2000-12-11 Syndicat de l'enseignement du Grand-Portage v. Morency, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 913, 2000 SCC 62
(CanLII)
2000-12-05 R. v. Simard, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 911, 2000 SCC 61 (CanLII)
1999 Jan
1999-01-28 Vancouver Society of Immigrant and Visible Minority Women v. M.N.R., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 10,
1999 CanLII 704 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-28 Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods Ltd., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142, 1999 CanLII 705 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-28 Ryan v. Victoria (City), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 201, 1999 CanLII 706 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-28 Chartier v. Chartier, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 242, 1999 CanLII 707 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-25 Chambly (City) v. Gagnon, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 8, 1999 CanLII 703 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-21 Del Zotto v. Canada, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 3, 1999 CanLII 701 (S.C.C.)
1999-01-21 Zink v. Graybec Immobilier Inc., [1999] 1 S.C.R. 6, 1999 CanLII 702 (S.C.C.)
1999 Feb
1999-02-25 R. v. Ewanchuk, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 330, 1999 CanLII 711 (S.C.C.)
1999-02-24 Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Montreal (City);
Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Boisbriand (City), [1999] 1
S.C.R. 381, 1999 CanLII 712 (S.C.C.)
1999-02-04 Sail Labrador Ltd. v. Challenge One (The), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 265, 1999 CanLII 708 (S.C.C.)
1999-02-04 R. v. Godoy, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 311, 1999 CanLII 709 (S.C.C.)
1999 Mar
1999-03-25 R. v. Sundown, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 393, 1999 CanLII 673 (S.C.C.)
1999-03-25 Smith v. Jones, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455, 1999 CanLII 674 (S.C.C.)
1999-03-25 Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 497, 1999 CanLII
675 (S.C.C.)
1999-03-25 Bracklow v. Bracklow, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 420, 1999 CanLII 715 (S.C.C.)
1999-03-17 R. v. W.S. (R.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 391, 1999 CanLII 713 (S.C.C.)
1999 Apr
1999-04-29 Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue) v. Nolisair International Inc. (Trustee of); Sécurité
Saglac (1992) Inc. (Trustee of) v. Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 759, 1999 CanLII
682 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-23 R. v. Monney, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 652, 1999 CanLII 678 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-23 R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, 1999 CanLII 679 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-23 CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 743, 1999 CanLII
680 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-23 R. v. Trombley, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 757, 1999 CanLII 681 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-22 R. v. Campbell, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 565, 1999 CanLII 676 (S.C.C.)
1999-04-22 M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 619, 1999 CanLII 677
(S.C.C.)
1999 May
1999-05-27 R. v. Stone, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290, 1999 CanLII 688 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-20 R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768, 1999 CanLII 684 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-20 Novak v. Bond, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 808, 1999 CanLII 685 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-20 M. v. H., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 3, 1999 CanLII 686 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-20 Corbiere v. Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 203, 1999
CanLII 687 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-03 H. (D.) v. M. (H.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 761, 1999 CanLII 683 (S.C.C.)
1999-05-03 H. (D.) v. M. (H.), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 328, 1999 CanLII 710 (S.C.C.)
1999 June
1999-0617
1999-0617
1999-0617
1999-0617
1999-0617
1999-0617
1999-0610
1999-0610
1999-0610
Bazley v. Curry, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 534, 1999 CanLII 692 (S.C.C.)
Jacobi v. Griffiths, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 570, 1999 CanLII 693 (S.C.C.)
Winko v. British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 625, 1999 CanLII 694
(S.C.C.)
Bese v. British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 722, 1999 CanLII 695 (S.C.C.)
Orlowski v. British Columbia (Forensic Psychiatric Institute), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 733, 1999 CanLII 696
(S.C.C.)
R. v. LePage, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 744, 1999 CanLII 697 (S.C.C.)
R. v. White, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417, 1999 CanLII 689 (S.C.C.)
R. v. G. (B.), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 475, 1999 CanLII 690 (S.C.C.)
Hickey v. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518, 1999 CanLII 691 (S.C.C.)
1999 July
1999-07-09 Dobson (Litigation Guardian of) v. Dobson, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 753, 1999 CanLII 698 (S.C.C.)
1999-07-09 Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817, 1999 CanLII
699 (S.C.C.)
1999-07-09 Best v. Best, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 868, 1999 CanLII 700 (S.C.C.)
1999 Aug
1999 Sept
1999-09-17 Des Champs v. Conseil des écoles séparées catholiques de langue française de PrescottRussell, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 281, 1999 CanLII 660 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-17 Abouchar v. Ottawa-Carleton French-language School Board -- Public Sector, [1999] 3 S.C.R.
343, 1999 CanLII 661 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-17 Poulin v. Serge Morency et Associés Inc., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 351, 1999 CanLII 662 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-17 Perron-Malenfant v. Malenfant (Trustee of), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 375, 1999 CanLII 663 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-17 R. v. Marshall, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 456, 1999 CanLII 665 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-16 R. v. Liew, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 227, 1999 CanLII 658 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-16 Francis v. Baker, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 250, 1999 CanLII 659 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-15 Winters v. Legal Services Society, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 160, 1999 CanLII 656 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-15 Wells v. Newfoundland, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 199, 1999 CanLII 657 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-10 New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G. (J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 46,
1999 CanLII 653 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-10 Fraser River Pile & Dredge Ltd. v. Can-Dive Services Ltd., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 108, 1999 CanLII
654 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-10 Westbank First Nation v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 134,
1999 CanLII 655 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-09 U.F.C.W., Local 1518, v. KMart Canada Ltd., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1083, 1999 CanLII 650 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-09 Allsco Building Products Ltd. v. U.F.C.W., Local 1288P, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 1136, 1999 CanLII
651 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-09 British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, [1999] 3
S.C.R. 3, 1999 CanLII 652 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-02 M & D Farm Ltd. v. Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corp., [1999] 2 S.C.R. 961, 1999 CanLII
648 (S.C.C.)
1999-09-02 Delisle v. Canada (Deputy Attorney General), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 989, 1999 CanLII 649 (S.C.C.)
1999 Oct
1999-10-15 Shell Canada Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 622, 1999 CanLII 647 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 Guarantee Co. of North America v. Gordon Capital Corp., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 423, 1999 CanLII
664 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 R. v. F. (W.J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 569, 1999 CanLII 667 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 R. v. W. (G.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 597, 1999 CanLII 668 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 R. v. Brown, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 660, 1999 CanLII 670 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 R. v. Fleming, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 662, 1999 CanLII 671 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-15 Royal Bank of Canada v. W. Got Associates Electric Ltd., [1999] 3 S.C.R. 408, 1999 CanLII
714 (S.C.C.)
1999-10-07 R. v. Lance, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 658, 1999 CanLII 669 (S.C.C.)
1999 Nov
1999-11R. v. Mills, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668, 1999 CanLII 637 (S.C.C.)
25
1999-11R. v. Davis, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 759, 1999 CanLII 638 (S.C.C.)
25
1999-1165302 British Columbia Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 804, 1999 CanLII 639 (S.C.C.)
25
1999-1118
1999-1117
1999-1112
1999-1105
1999-1104
Public School Boards' Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 845, 1999 CanLII
640 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Marshall, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 533, 1999 CanLII 666 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Timm, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 666, 1999 CanLII 636 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Groot, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 664, 1999 CanLII 672 (S.C.C.)
Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 851, 1999 CanLII 641 (S.C.C.)
1999 Dec
199912-16
199912-16
199912-13
199912-08
199912-07
R. v. Terceira, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 866, 1999 CanLII 645 (S.C.C.)
British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) v. British Columbia (Council of Human Rights),
[1999] 3 S.C.R. 868, 1999 CanLII 646 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Pelletier, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 863, 1999 CanLII 644 (S.C.C.)
Renaud v. Quebec (Commission des affaires sociales), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 855, 1999 CanLII 642 (S.C.C.)
Apotex Inc. v. Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 857, 1999 CanLII 643 (S.C.C.)
1998 Jan
1998-01-30 R. v. Bekoe, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 90, 1998 CanLII 843 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-28 R. v. Shalaan, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 88, 1998 CanLII 842 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-23 R. v. Horne, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 85, 1998 CanLII 840 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-23 R. v. Maracle, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 86, 1998 CanLII 841 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-22 R. v. Poirier, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 24, 1998 CanLII 835 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-22 R. v. Taylor, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 26, 1998 CanLII 836 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-22 Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, 1998 CanLII 837 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-22 R. v. Caslake, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 51, 1998 CanLII 838 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-22 R. v. Underwood, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 77, 1998 CanLII 839 (S.C.C.)
1998-01-20 Dowling v. Halifax (City), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 22, 1998 CanLII 834 (S.C.C.)
1998 Feb
1998-02-27 R. v. H. (N.G.), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 318, 1998 CanLII 812 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-23 J.M. Asbestos Inc. v. Commission d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles, [1998] 1
S.C.R. 315, 1998 CanLII 811 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. Dixon, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 244, 1998 CanLII 805 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. Robart, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 279, 1998 CanLII 806 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. McQuaid, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 285, 1998 CanLII 807 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. Smith, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 291, 1998 CanLII 808 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. Skinner, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 298, 1998 CanLII 809 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-19 R. v. Bisson, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 306, 1998 CanLII 810 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-12 Giffen (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 91, 1998 CanLII 844 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-12 R. v. Malott, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 123, 1998 CanLII 845 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-12 Canderel Ltd. v. Canada, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 147, 1998 CanLII 846 (S.C.C.)
1998-02-12 Toronto College Park Ltd. v. Canada, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 183, 1998 CanLII 847 (S.C.C.)
1998 Mar
1998-03-19 Westcoast Energy Inc. v. Canada (National Energy Board), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 322, 1998 CanLII
813 (S.C.C.) 1998-03-19 Fontaine v. British Columbia (Official Administrator), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 424, 1998
CanLII 814 (S.C.C.)
1998 Apr
1998-04-30 R. v. Consolidated Maybrun Mines Ltd., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 706, 1998 CanLII 820 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-30 R. v. Al Klippert Ltd., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 737, 1998 CanLII 821 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-29 M & D Farm Ltd. v. Manitoba Agricultural Credit Corp., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1074, 1998 CanLII
779 (S.C.C.) 1998-04-29 R. v. Reed, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 753, 1998 CanLII 822 (S.C.C.) 1998-04-29 R. v.
Jussila, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 755, 1998 CanLII 823 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-09 Aubry v. Éditions Vice-Versa inc., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 591, 1998 CanLII 817 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-09 Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. Canadian Liberty Net, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 626, 1998
CanLII 818 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-09 R. v. Charemski, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 679, 1998 CanLII 819 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-02 R. v. Lucas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439, 1998 CanLII 815 (S.C.C.)
1998-04-02 Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 493, 1998 CanLII 816 (S.C.C.)
1998 May
1998-0529
1998-0529
1998-0528
1998-0528
1998-0527
1998-0526
1998-0526
1998-0521
1998-0520
1998-0519
1998 June
R. v. Abdallah, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 980, 1998 CanLII 777 (S.C.C.)
Thomson Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 877, 1998 CanLII 829 (S.C.C.)
Duha Printers (Western) Ltd. v. Canada, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 795, 1998 CanLII 827 (S.C.C.)
Schreiber v. Canada (Attorney General), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 841, 1998 CanLII 828 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Druken, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 978, 1998 CanLII 832 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Bernier, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 975, 1998 CanLII 830 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Mullins-Johnson, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 977, 1998 CanLII 831 (S.C.C.)
Neuman v. M.N.R., [1998] 1 S.C.R. 770, 1998 CanLII 826 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Reitsma, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 769, 1998 CanLII 825 (S.C.C.)
Chippewas of Kettle and Stony Point v. Canada (Attorney General), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 756, 1998 CanLII
824 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-25 R. v. Daigle, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1220, 1998 CanLII 786 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-23 R. v. Gellvear, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1218, 1998 CanLII 785 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-18 Union of New Brunswick Indians v. New Brunswick (Minister of Finance), [1998] 1 S.C.R.
1161, 1998 CanLII 783 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-18 R. v. Puskas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1207, 1998 CanLII 784 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-04 Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 982, 1998
CanLII 778 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-04 Canada Safeway Ltd. v. RWDSU, Local 454, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1079, 1998 CanLII 780 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-04 Battlefords and District Co-operatives Ltd. v. RWDSU, Local 544, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1118, 1998
CanLII 781 (S.C.C.)
1998-06-04 R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128, 1998 CanLII 782 (S.C.C.)
1998 July
1998-07-09 Gauthier v. Beaumont, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 3, 1998 CanLII 788 (S.C.C.)
1998-07-09 R. v. White, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 72, 1998 CanLII 789 (S.C.C.)
1998-07-09 R. v. Ménard, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 109, 1998 CanLII 790 (S.C.C.)
1998-07-09 Eli Lilly & Co. v. Novopharm Ltd., [1998] 2 S.C.R. 129, 1998 CanLII 791 (S.C.C.)
1998-07-09 Merck Frosst Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of National Health and Welfare), [1998] 2
S.C.R. 193, 1998 CanLII 792 (S.C.C.)
1998 Aug
1998-08-20 Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217, 1998 CanLII 793 (S.C.C.)
1998 Sept
1998-09-24 R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449, 1998 CanLII 798 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-24 R. v. Wells, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 517, 1998 CanLII 799 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-17 Pushpanathan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1222,
1998 CanLII 787 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-15 Ref. re Remuneration of Judges of Prov. Court of PEI; Ref. re Independence & Impartiality of
Judges of Prov. Court of PEI; R. v. Campbell; R. v. Ekmecic; R. v. Wickman; Manitoba Prov. Judges Assn.
v. Manitoba (Min. of Justice), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 443, 1998 CanLII 797 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-03 Continental Bank Leasing Corp. v. Canada, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 298, 1998 CanLII 794 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-03 Continental Bank of Canada v. Canada, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 358, 1998 CanLII 795 (S.C.C.)
1998-09-03 R. v. Cuerrier, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 371, 1998 CanLII 796 (S.C.C.)
1998 Oct
1998-10-30 Degelder Construction Co. v. Dancorp Developments Ltd., [1998] 3 S.C.R. 90, 1998 CanLII
765 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-30 Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., [1998] 3 S.C.R. 112, 1998 CanLII 766 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-29 R. v. MacDougall, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 45, 1998 CanLII 763 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-29 R. v. Gallant, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 80, 1998 CanLII 764 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-22 Consortium Developments (Clearwater) Ltd. v. Sarnia (City), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 3, 1998 CanLII
762 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-22 Eurig Estate (Re), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 565, 1998 CanLII 801 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-16 R. v. Lauda, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 683, 1998 CanLII 804 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-15 R. v. W. (D.D.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 681, 1998 CanLII 803 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-01 New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. L. (M.), [1998] 2 S.C.R. 534,
1998 CanLII 800 (S.C.C.)
1998-10-01 R. v. Cook, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 597, 1998 CanLII 802 (S.C.C.)
1998 Nov
1998-11-26
1998-11-26
1998-11-26
1998-11-26
1998-11-13
R. v. Rose, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 262, 1998 CanLII 768 (S.C.C.)
R. v. Arp, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 339, 1998 CanLII 769 (S.C.C.)
R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393, 1998 CanLII 770 (S.C.C.)
Ordon Estate v. Grail, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 437, 1998 CanLII 771 (S.C.C.)
Lawlor v. Royal, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 260, 1998 CanLII 767 (S.C.C.)
1999 Dec
1998-12-24 R. v. Campbell, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 956, 1998 CanLII 761 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-17 R. v. Thomas, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 535, 1998 CanLII 774 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-17 R. v. Warsing, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 579, 1998 CanLII 775 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-17 R. v. Pearson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 620, 1998 CanLII 776 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-16 Shell Canada Ltd. v. Canada, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 616, 1998 CanLII 760 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-11 R. v. Campbell, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 533, 1998 CanLII 772 (S.C.C.)
1998-12-11 R. v. White, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 534, 1998 CanLII 773 (S.C.C.)
1997 Apr
1997-04-28 Brkich & Brkich Enterprises Ltd. v. American Home Assurance Co., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1149,
1997 CanLII 339 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-25 R. v. Coreas, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1147, 1997 CanLII 338 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-24 R. v. Noble, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 874, 1997 CanLII 388 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-24 R. v. McDonnell, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 948, 1997 CanLII 389 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-24 Pointe-Claire (City) v. Quebec (Labour Court), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1015, 1997 CanLII 390
(S.C.C.)
1997-04-24 Hamstra (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia Rugby Union, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1092, 1997
CanLII 391 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-24 R. v. Cook, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1113, 1997 CanLII 392 (S.C.C.)
1997-04-23 Germain v. Montreal (City), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 1144, 1997 CanLII 393 (S.C.C.)
1997 May
1997-05-30 Canadian Egg Marketing Agency v. Richardson, [1998] 3 S.C.R. 157, 1997 CanLII 295
(S.C.C.)
1997-05-29 Canada Post Corp. v. Canadian Union of Postal Workers, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 294, 1997 CanLII
351 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-29 Construction Gilles Paquette ltée v. Entreprises Végo ltée, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 299, 1997 CanLII
352 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-29 Sylvester v. British Columbia, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 315, 1997 CanLII 353 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-29 United States of America v. Desfossés, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 326, 1997 CanLII 354 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-27 R. v. Bedford, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 292, 1997 CanLII 350 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-26 Martin v. Artyork Investments Ltd., [1997] 2 S.C.R. 290, 1997 CanLII 349 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-23 R. v. Senior, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 288, 1997 CanLII 348 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-22 R. v. Feeney, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 13, 1997 CanLII 342 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-22 Opetchesaht Indian Band v. Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 119, 1997 CanLII 344 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-22 Hercules Managements Ltd. v. Ernst & Young, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 165,
1997 CanLII 345 (S.C.C.) 1997-05-22 Soulos v. Korkontzilas, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 217, 1997 CanLII 346
(S.C.C.)
1997-05-22 R. v. Currie, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 260, 1997 CanLII 347 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-20 R. v. Doliente, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 11, 1997 CanLII 341 (S.C.C.)
1997-05-07 Richter & Partners Inc. v. Ernst & Young, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 5, 1997 CanLII 340 (S.C.C.)
1997 June
1997-06-27 Côté v. Canada (Director of Investigation and Research), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 714, 1997 CanLII
310 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-27 R. v. Feeney (Application), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 117, 1997 CanLII 343 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680, 1997 CanLII 309 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 Hickman Motors Ltd. v. Canada, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 336, 1997 CanLII 357 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 Dagg v. Canada (Minister of Finance), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 403, 1997 CanLII 358 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 United States of America v. Dynar, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 462, 1997 CanLII 359 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 Arndt v. Smith, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 539, 1997 CanLII 360 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 Air Canada v. Ontario (Liquor Control Board), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 581, 1997 CanLII 361 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 Armada Lines Ltd. v. Chaleur Fertilizers Ltd., [1997] 2 S.C.R. 617, 1997 CanLII 362 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 R. v. Mara, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 630, 1997 CanLII 363 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-26 ST. Mary's Indian Band v. Cranbrook (City), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 657, 1997 CanLII 364 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-20 R. v. Allender, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 333, 1997 CanLII 355 (S.C.C.)
1997-06-20 R. v. Jack, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 334, 1997 CanLII 356 (S.C.C.)
1997 July
1997-07-10 R. v. G. (S.G.), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 716, 1997 CanLII 311 (S.C.C.)
1997-07-10 R. v. Greyeyes, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 825, 1997 CanLII 313 (S.C.C.)
1997 -07-10 R. v. Cogger, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 845, 1997 CanLII 314 (S.C.C.)
1997-07-10 Doré v. Verdun (City), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 862, 1997 CanLII 315 (S.C.C.)
1997 Aug
1997-08-28 Pasiechnyk v. Saskatchewan (Workers' Compensation Board), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 890, 1997
CanLII 316 (S.C.C.)
1997 Sept
1997-09-26 Canada (Attorney General) v. Canada (Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System), [1997] 3
S.C.R. 440, 1997 CanLII 323 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-26 R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, 1997 CanLII 324 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-26 Peixeiro v. Haberman, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 549, 1997 CanLII 325 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-25 R. v. Belnavis, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 341, 1997 CanLII 320 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-25 Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Tobiass, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 391, 1997
CanLII 322 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-23 Benner v. Canada (Secretary of State), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 389, 1997 CanLII 321 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-23 ST. Mary's Indian Band v. Cranbrook (City), [1997] 2 S.C.R. 678, 1997 CanLII 365 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-18 Ref re Remuneration of Judges of the Prov. Court of P.E.I.; Ref re Independence and
Impartiality of Judges of the Prov. Court of P.E.I., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 3, 1997 CanLII 317 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-18 R. v. Hydro-Québec, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 213, 1997 CanLII 318 (S.C.C.)
1997-09-18 R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320, 1997 CanLII 319 (S.C.C.)
1997 Oct
1997-10-31 Godbout v. Longueuil (City), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 844, 1997 CanLII 335 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-31 Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. G. (D.F.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 925, 1997
CanLII 336 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-30 Wallace v. United Grain Growers Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 701, 1997 CanLII 332 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-30 Gold v. Rosenberg, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 767, 1997 CanLII 333 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-30 Citadel General Assurance Co. v. Lloyds Bank Canada, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 805, 1997 CanLII 334
(S.C.C.)
1997-10-17 R. v. Ly, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 698, 1997 CanLII 330 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-17 R. v. Allen, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 700, 1997 CanLII 331 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-10 R. v. Lawes, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 694, 1997 CanLII 328 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-10 R. v. Solomon, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 696, 1997 CanLII 329 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-09 Libman v. Quebec (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 569, 1997 CanLII 326 (S.C.C.)
1997-10-09 Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624, 1997 CanLII 327
(S.C.C.)
1997 Nov
1997-11-21 R. v. Feeney, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1008, 1997 CanLII 301 (S.C.C.)
1997-11-14 R. v. Bablitz, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1005, 1997 CanLII 299 (S.C.C.)
1997-11-07 R. v. Labrecque, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1001, 1997 CanLII 297 (S.C.C.)
1997-11-07 S. (L.) v. S. (C.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1003, 1997 CanLII 298 (S.C.C.)
1997-11-06 R. v. Skalbania, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 995, 1997 CanLII 337 (S.C.C.)
1997 Dec
1997-12-18 R. v. F. (C.C.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1183, 1997 CanLII 306 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-18 Bow Valley Husky (Bermuda) Ltd. v. Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1210,
1997 CanLII 307 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-18 Porto Seguro Companhia De Seguros Gerais v. Belcan S.A., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1278, 1997
CanLII 308 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-11 Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010, 1997 CanLII 302 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-11 Lewis (Guardian ad litem of) v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1145, 1997 CanLII 304
(S.C.C.)
1997-12-11 Mochinski v. Trendline Industries Ltd., [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1176, 1997 CanLII 305 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-04 R. v. Charland, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1006, 1997 CanLII 300 (S.C.C.)
1997-12-01 R. v. Kudmani, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1142, 1997 CanLII 303 (S.C.C.)