LA TROBE UNIVERSITY HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES/ PLANNING HUS 2/3 IST 2013 ASSIGNMENT TWO, ASSESSMENT SHEET Blog Contributions (20%) STUDENT’S NAME: Very Good Good Satisfactory Passable Unsatisfactory Content Active participation/engagement Conceptual/thematic Understanding Creativity Quality of reflection Communication Referencing Comments: Marked by: Grade: See over for details of assessment criteria. Key to Assessment Criteria The assessment criteria are intended as indicators only, they are not added up to make your final mark but are interrelated (e.g. clear communication is an important part of demonstrating your understanding). Content: Your blog entries should demonstrate your engagement with the study tour at FIVE key moments before/during and immediately after our visit to Sheffield (you will be penalised for not making regular contributions in this way). You are required to make a minimum FIVE contributions (equivalent 2000 words) – see assessment information on LMS – THREE of which should be written contributions (you can include photographs and videos to make up the remaining contributions). If you prefer, you can make more regular, shorter entries – there is no limit on the entries you can make. Evidence of Active Participation and Engagement: The blog must demonstrate your active engagement and participation in the study tour through referring to the activities you have taken part in (this might include photographs of activities), reflecting on your expectations, discussing how your expectations have been met/challenged/exceeded, and reflecting on how your thinking has developed during the tour. Conceptual/ Thematic Understanding: Blog entries should engage with and demonstrate an understanding of some of the central concepts/ themes of the subject (for example: industrialisation, urbanisation, urban planning, class, deindustrialisation). Creativity: You will be rewarded for evidence of creative engagement with the study tour e.g. you might upload some images/ video that captures a particular moment in a creative way. You may write about an incident in a creative way, or capture something which others have not noticed. Quality of individual reflection: Your blog entries should demonstrate that you are reflecting on your expectations and experiences of the study tour. You should discuss what you are thinking and why. Avoid just narrating what happens during the tour (story-telling) and examine your responses to what has happened (e.g. why did you find something surprising, interesting, etc) Communication: Clear communication is an important part of contributing to any public/ online forum – whether in textual or visual form. Blog entries will not be assessed in the same way as an academic essay and may include more personal reactions and more informal language (though no inappropriate/ abusive language will be accepted). Blog entries on the public blog should be readable and their meaning should be clear to a general reader. Images/visual material should be clearly labelled and be clearly connected to the study tour themes. Referencing: You should provide a label and a source for any images/videos uploaded to the blog (e.g. Photograph of Sheffield Town Hall, Personal collection, Emma Robertson). If any other materials/ literature are used in your blog (e.g. quotes from reading), an appropriate and consistent system of referencing (as described in the course notes) should be used. Plagiarism will be dealt with as a disciplinary issue. By submitting entries to the Blog, students are confirming that this is their own work.