2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 1 Company(ies): Southern North Sea Velocity String NAM Installation Campaign Author(s): Contact Information: Ewout Biezen ewout.biezen@shell.com Lucas Hoekstra Albert Bootsma Roel Aretz Stefan Gesterkamp Aykut Goncu Abstract: About 100 of the 300 offshore gas wells located in the Southern North Sea asset are currently liquid loading and this number will steadily increase in future as depletion continues. A screening study was carried out to assess whether the production from these liquid loaded wells can be economically extended by installation of either continuous foam injection or a velocity string. This resulted in a 20-well velocity string campaign and a 50 well continuous foam campaign (not addressed in this presentation). The presentation describes the velocity string campaign i.e. velocity string candidate selection, velocity string completion design, well and platform preparation, and actual velocity string installation plus production experience to date. Solutions: The velocity string hardware had to be modified to be successful: the seals on the velocity string hanger were changed from wireline type to completion type to deal with the more challenging completion type deployment conditions; the hanger keys were chamfered to ease deployment; and a different type running tool was mobilized to prevent premature release. Finally a standard part of the VS design had a sliding side door below the subsurface safety valve included to provide flexibility in the choice of flow path: annular deadstring flow or VS flow. Results: Large size (up to 2 7/8” OD) corrosion resistant coiled tubing velocity strings have been installed successfully so far in 10+ Southern North Sea offshore gas wells. The installed velocity strings will provide a longer and stable production future for some of the more depleted gas assets in the North Sea, extending field life and improving ultimate recovery. The campaign style execution provided the opportunity to improve performance, procedures and hardware during the campaign which resulted in an acceptable job duration following the first two jobs which took much longer than expected. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 2 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 2 Company(ies): Effect of Tube Wall Wettability on TNO the Onset of Churning In Upward Delft Gas-Liquid Annular Flow NAM Author(s): Contact Information: E.D. Nennie erik.nennie@tno.nl J.S. Groen S.P.C. Belfroid V. Khosla C.A.M. Veeken Abstract: The production of hydrocarbon gas is often accompanied by liquid. As a result, annular flow is often found in well tubes and pipelines used for the production and transport of hydrocarbon gas, with the liquid flowing partly as a thin wavy film along the tube wall and partly as droplets entrained in the turbulent gas core. As the velocity of the gas decreases, it becomes insufficient to drag the liquid upwards, leading to flow reversal and the transition from annular to churn flow. As a result, liquid begins to accumulate at the bottom of the well, and eventually may block the production of gas. Visualization experiments and experiments at different liquid-to-gas ratios and inclination angles are performed in coated and uncoated steel and Perspex pipes of different diameters: 20 mm, 50 mm and 67 mm. Basic flow characteristics such as pressure drop and liquid hold-up were measured. Experiments with different angles ranging from 90° (vertical) to close to horizontal (10°) were performed for the 20mm diameter tube. The impact of the wall wettability on the flow patterns was examined by performing flow visualizations with a high speed camera in coated and uncoated Perspex tubes. From the experiments if becomes clear that the hydrophobic coating prevents the formation of a liquid film on the tube wall. As a result, the transport of the liquid phase is solely in the form of droplets/ligaments. In the hydrophobic coated tube, the onset of churning is at a lower gas velocity than in the uncoated tube. The change in the flow patterns from annular to churn flow is reflected by a minimum in the measurement pressure drop, followed by a sharp increase. The presence of the coating can reduce the superficial gas velocity corresponding to the minimum pressure drop by as much as 50%. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 3 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 3 Company(ies): Model the Effectiveness of Plunger NAM and Downhole Pump by Transient SPT Group Multi-Phase Flow Simulation Author(s): Contact Information: Kees Veeken Kees.Veeken@shell.com Rahel Yusuf Abstract: Transient multi-phase flow simulations have been carried out to answer two important deliquification questions: What is the effectiveness of a plunger that travels up to the subsurface safety valve but does not cover the short distance between subsurface safety valve and wellhead? The outcome determines the requirement for a second plunger to dewater the top section. How much back pressure is introduced by the flowing wet gas column in the presence of a downhole pump that removes liquids from the bottom of the well? The outcome determines the effectiveness of a downhole pump and defines the best ways of operating a downhole pump. The presentation provides model details and results, and compares model results against field data. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 4 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 4 Company(ies): Product Enhancement, Asset ProIntegrity Management and Control tection, and Human Safety Author(s): Contact Information: Lance Witt lwitt@integrity-measure.com Abstract: Why are chemicals utilized in oil and gas production and transmission? Chemicals improve the quality of hydrocarbon products by reducing and/or eliminating contaminants and predicted destructive events. Chemical treatments also protect assets and human health. Typical contaminants to be mitigated include hydrogen sulfide (H 2S), carbon dioxide, oxygen, water, paraffin, scale, and bacteria. Potentially destructive events include hydrate formation and asset corrosion. In order to maintain the quality of the oil and gas stream component, the appropriate measurement technology must be chosen and the correct methodology followed. An improper choice may lead to inaccurate measurements since chemical interferences can skew results. For instance, when measuring H 2S certain technologies give false high readings due to interference from other sulfur compounds while lead acetate technology is not subject to this interference. False high readings lead to excessive use of H 2S scavenger and a waste of financial resources. Once contaminants and components of a stream are identified and quantified, the appropriate chemicals can be selected. A treatment plan takes into consideration physical properties of chemicals, process conditions, treatment locations, injection methods, pump rates and efficiency, nozzle discharge patterns, tank sizes, and other factors. The most overlooked and misunderstood component of the system is the atomizer nozzle or liquid mixing probe. The optimal program consists of multiple components engineered as a system. Automation of this engineered system maximizes the efficiency of the chemical treatment while providing real time data. Pump rates are automatically adjusted based on containment and chemical concentration data and tank level feedback. Operators treating for H 2S have realized cost savings in the 90% range when the complete automated engineered system is utilized. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 5 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 5 Company(ies): Intrinsically Safe Acoustic InstruEchometer Company ment Used in Troubleshooting GasLift Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Lynn Rowlan lynn@echometer.com Carrie Anne Taylor Abstract: Stringent safety requirements imposed by major operators when fluid level measurements are performed offshore or in enclosed wellhead spaces such as in Alaska’s North Slope create procedural complications, such as the requirement for hot permits, when performing fluid level measurements in producing wells. This need has been eliminated by the development of a small, self contained, fully digital, battery powered instrument that is approved for use in hazardous areas. Examples from North Sea platforms and Alaska North Slope of acoustic liquid test of gas lifted wells will be presented. The signal from the liquid level echo and the signals that correspond to the echoes from the gas lift mandrels are frequently identifiable on the acoustic trace. An “Anomaly” analysis method using the known depth of each mandrel is used to accurately determine the liquid level depth. For this method the software initially places tick marks on the depth axis that correspond to the depth of the known down hole markers in the well. The user then manually relocates the markers, starting with the topmost signal, at the exact point in time of the signal arrival. The acoustic velocity for that time interval is computed knowing the depth to the marker. This procedure yields a more accurate calculation of the liquid level depth especially in those wellbores where there are significant temperature variations, such as in offshore platforms, or when the gas column is stratified. The acquisition and interpretation of the data through an advanced software package automates the analysis even in acoustically noisy environments. Results are observed immediately on the instrument screen then saved in the data base for eventual transfer to external data base. This presentation shows detailed information about the new system and reviews data acquired in gas lift wells. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 6 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: I --- New Technologies, Session Chair: Challenges, General Topics Kelli Poppenhagen Presentation Title: I – 6 Company(ies): Possible ALRDC R&D Projects Artificial Lift R&D Council (ALRDC) Author(s): Contact Information: Cleon Dunham cleon@oilfieldautomation.com Abstract: Part of the Charter of The Artificial Lift R&D Council (ALRDC) is to sponsor, encourage, and/or promote artificial lift R&D projects. ALRDC has an R&D Committee to oversee this activity. ALRDC is considering a number of potential R&D projects. These will be explained in this presentation. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 7 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: II --- Reservoir, StimulaSession Chair: tion, Impact of Loading Norm Hein Presentation Title: II – 1 Company(ies): Joint Industry Project: Predicting TNO the Gain from Deliquification Measures For European Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Wouter Schiferli wouter.schiferli@tno.nl J.P. de Boer E.D. Nennie Abstract: In discussions with various operators, a clear demand was identified for increased application of deliquification measures in North Sea wells. A Joint Industry Project was set up to identify knowledge and experience gained in the United States on gas well deliquification and transfer this to European wells. In the first phase, a literature search was conducted. This provided a broad overview of the techniques used to deliquify gas wells suffering from liquid loading and a set of available guidelines predicting the range of application. Having identified potential techniques, a selection tool was developed which suggests the most suitable deliquification technique for a given well. The selection tool can predict the gains in production and ultimate recovery resulting from applying a range of techniques: Velocity string Eductor Wellhead compression ESP Foam Gas lift Plunger lift Tailpipe extension The selection tool is based on TPC (lift curve) analysis and IPR analysis; performance therefore also depends on reservoir characteristics. For each of these techniques, a model was available or developed to simplify their operating principles to a TPC. Results from this tool can aid in deciding what mitigation measure to implement, as it gives a clear overview of the production gain that is possible for the different techniques. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 8 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: II --- Reservoir, StimulaSession Chair: tion, Impact of Loading Norm Hein Presentation Title: II – 2 Company(ies): The Effect of Surfactants on the Hy- NAM drodynamics of Air-Water Flow for Univ. of Delft Gas Well Deliquification Author(s): Contact Information: A.T. van Nimwegen gert.devries@shell.com L.M. Portela R.A.W.M. Henkes GJ de Vries Abstract: From experience in the gas industry, it is known that injecting surfactants at the bottom of the well prevents liquid loading. Although this technique is frequently applied in practice, understanding the effect the surfactant has on the flow in the well is still poor. Better knowledge and understanding of this effect is required to create a mechanistic model for air-water-foam flow. In this work, laboratory experiments were performed on air-water flow with and without added surfactants in a 12 meter long vertical Perspex pipe with an inner diameter of 50 mm at ambient conditions. Superficial liquid velocities were varied from 2 mm/s to 50 mm/s and superficial gas velocities were in the range of 6 to 40 m/s. A high-speed camera was used to visualize the flow. In addition, the pressure drop was measured to quantify the effect of the surfactants on the flow. The formation of foam is caused by the interfacial morphology of the liquid film, leading to the entrainment of air bubbles into the liquid. At high gas flow rates, the ripple waves and the roll waves on the liquid film cause the formation of foam. The presence of this foam leads to an increased interfacial friction and an increase in the pressure drop. At low gas flow rates, the churning of the air-water flow leads to the creation of foam. The images recorded with the high-speed camera show that the foam makes the flow more regular. It postpones the reversal of the liquid film towards lower gas velocities and suppresses the flooding waves that characterize unstable churn flow. From pressure measurements, we found that the pressure drop significantly decreases at superficial gas velocities below 15 m/s. Furthermore, the more regular flow leads to smaller oscillations of the pressure drop in time. The regularization of the flow and the large decrease of the pressure drop at low gas velocities give insight into why and how liquid loading in gas wells is prevented by the addition of foamers. Acknowledgement: The project is funded by NAM, a Dutch subsidiary of Shell and ExxonMobil. The authors would like to thank Gert de Vries, Kees Veeken, Ewout Biezen and Ruud Trompert from NAM for the valuable discussions. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 9 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: II --- Reservoir, StimulaSession Chair: tion, Impact of Loading Norm Hein Presentation Title: II – 3 Company(ies): Optimal Dead-Leg Tubing Length in Shell EP Long Perforated Completion Intervals Author(s): Contact Information: Matt Vivian Matt.Vivian@shell.com Alec Walker Abstract: Dead-Leg Tubing Configurations are a good solution to lift liquid below top perforations in long multistage fracture treatment wells; however when the entry point is set too shallow it results in liquid across the majority of the production interval and reduced production due to high Bottom Hole Pressures (BHP). Long Perforated Completion Intervals common to gas wells present challenges for High Liquid Gas Ratio (LGR) wells as plunger lift cannot unload sufficient fluid to total depth. Energy Added Lift solutions (gas lift and pumps) would be ideal, but typically fail to meet economic hurdles in gas wells. Often operating companies setup the well configuration as a Dead-Leg using standard tubing flow from surface to the top perforation and annular flow between casing and tubing string run to bottom perforations to fill dead space as velocity reduction. While the annular flow is more effective than traditional tubing at top perforations, the Turner Critical Rate is still nearly double that of the upper tubing string and thus ineffective at maintaining the liquid level near bottom perforations. Therefore it is best to minimize the Dead-Leg length and flow the full well production down around the end of tubing and cycle a plunger as deep as possible. In the Pinedale Anticline Field of the Green River Basin over 100 wells have been configured with DeadLeg entry points and successfully applied plunger lift above the shallower entry point. With a 6,000' perforated interval the Dead-Leg had been placed at 25, 50, and 75% of the completion interval based on the LGR. It has been found the well dictates optimal entry point based on downtime and slugging, but is best setup with as deep an entry point as the LGR can handle and then move the entry point uphole. Findings of field trials will be presented. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 10 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: III --- Compression, GasSession Chair: Lift, Velocity String Kees Veeken Larry Harms Presentation Title: III – 1 Company(ies): Two Short Topics: Using Compres- Consultant sors More Effectively. Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift Author(s): Contact Information: Jim Hacksma jim.hacksma@comcast.net Abstract: Using Compressors More Effectively Liquid loaded gas wells & compressors don’t work together very well. A common characteristic of loaded wells is erratic production, sometimes falling almost to zero. However, compressors can’t tolerate such low gas rates. The compressor can be starved for gas & quit due to low suction pressures. The result is excessive compressor downtime & poor production. Actual field data will be used to show how these problems can be overcome. Improving Upon Poor-Boy Gas-Lift (PBGL) PBGL has very limited application because of two significant limitations. 1) Because PBGL has no gas-lift valves, it is not capable of handling large columns of liquid. 2) And, as with most gas-lift systems, PBGL requires an outside source of gas. It will be shown, however; that with many gas wells both of these limitations can be overcome. It is possible to lift moderate liquid volumes from many gas wells a) without gas-lift valves and b) without an outside source of gas. Actual field data will be used to demonstrate how this is possible. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 11 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: III --- Compression, GasSession Chair: Lift, Velocity String Kees Veeken Larry Harms Presentation Title: III – 2 Company(ies): Plunger Assisted Gas-Lift PCS Ferguson Improving Lift Efficiency in Gas-Lift Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Darryl Polasek Matt.Carpenter@pcslift.com Abstract: Problem being addressed: Operators face many challenges associated with reducing operating costs while maximizing well production. The goal is to achieve the most efficient and effective form of lift based on these considerations. Challenges: There are many situations in which wells don’t have sufficient natural energy to move liquids to the surface at desired rates. Changing well conditions, such as reduced reservoir pressure, increasing water cuts and decreasing gas liquid ratios make consistent and predictable production challenging for operators. Solution: Plunger lift and gas-lift are often considered independently lift methods. However, often they can be used in combination to even greater effect. Plunger lift can be used to assist gas-lift wells with certain characteristics, specifically lower gas and higher liquid production. In continuous flow gas-lift wells with marginal flow characteristics, a flow-thru/continuous flow plunger lift system can be installed in the well to assist in carrying liquids to the surface. The gas-lift and plunger lift system work together to reduce the amount of injected gas and, consequently, lower the compression costs. Plunger assisted gas-lift improves lift efficiency in deviated and horizontal wells, is able to handle high rates of fluid and is beneficial to the tubing as the plunger operation up and down prevents scale or paraffin from forming on the inner tubing walls. Results: Continuous flow gas-lift applications utilizing flow-thru/continuous flow plungers are being used successfully and economically to improve lift efficiency. We will review the scenario when plunger assisted gas-lift has been effective, problems being addressed and our field experiences with these systems. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 12 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: III --- Compression, GasSession Chair: Lift, Velocity String Kees Veeken Larry Harms Presentation Title: III – 3 Company(ies): Inverse Gas-Lift System (IGLS) Weatherford Author(s): Contact Information: Rodger Lacy Rodger.Lacy@eu.weatherford.com Abstract: Many wells are now reaching the stage that they may require to be gas-lifted in order to both maximize the life of well and to increase production. IGLS allows a method of gas injection via an insert string. The system is designed to maximize both gas injection and production flow paths with no reliance on annuli, and with a safety valve that fully isolates both production and injection flow paths on closure. To date a coiled tubing string has been utilized below the well control part of the system. Gas injection is via a newly installed bore consisting of: Intermediate spool and concentric hanger at surface, Coiled tubing or pipe from surface to suspension hanger and dual flow safety valve installed in the existing safety valve profile, Coiled tubing to gas injection depth and gas injection valve. Production is via the annular spaces and bores of the IGLS components and coiled tubing / pipe. IGLS can be installed using traditional intervention techniques therefore making this a cost effective option to any work over program. Components of the IGLS can be used for other applications e.g. water injection systems, in order to dissolve salt deposits that reduce production rates, and can also be combined with some of our Renaissance System components. These systems offer a revival for troubled wells by expanding the productive life. This paper will discuss the development of the IGLS system and describe the first installation in a UK North Sea well. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 13 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Presentation Title: IV – 1 Company(ies): Ball and Sleeve Plunger System Au- Anadarko Petroleum Corporation tomation Algorithm Utilizing Ball Fall IPS Corporation Rates Author(s): Contact Information: B. Smiley Jason.Carmichael@anadarko.com J. Portillo Abstract: Session: IV --- Plunger Lift Initial setup, configuration, and tuning of a ball and sleeve plunger lift system can be a tedious process for an operator that is new to the system. First, the operator must determine if the well is a ball and sleeve candidate by evaluating pressures and flow rates. Next, either based on experience or vendor supplied chart interpretation, the operator must make decisions such as; ball and sleeve size, method of operation, and time and other inputs. Errors in these decisions can lead to insufficient ball and sleeve separation causing short trips and increased liquid loading. In this presentation we review the trial of a PLC program which incorporates ball fall calculations. The PLC program iterates depth based on surface pressure and flow rate; shutting in the well when the ball reaches an inputted point down the tubing string. Results are presented from testing the PLC program for several months utilizing two different ball sizes on a single well. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 14 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Presentation Title: IV – 2 Company(ies): Automatic Plunger Lift Adjustment Encana Pilot Using Lean Methodology Author(s): Contact Information: Kelli Poppenhagen Kelli.Poppenhagen@encana.com Abstract: Session: IV --- Plunger Lift Automatic plunger lift adjustment was implemented on 24 wells in the Encana South Piceance Mamm Creek Field in Colorado using the Lean project methodology approach. The algorithm utilized makes adjustments to plunger lift control settings based on plunger arrival time and also reacts to consecutive missed plunger arrivals. Production for the 24 wells increased by 2.5% with the improvement as the program reacts to continuously changing surface pressures and liquid loads. The lease operator observed a one hour per day time burden savings as a result of the improvement. The project approach from definition to control will be shared including various Lean tools used. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 15 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Presentation Title: IV – 3 Company(ies): Minimizing Plunger Lift Risk T-RAM Canada Lynn Rowlan Contact Information: Carolyn Cepuch Lynn@echometer.com Abstract: Session: IV --- Plunger Lift This presentation will discuss flowing gas velocities plus plunger unloading and arrival velocity. Often operators think that high pressure wells are more dangerous. High pressure gas wells have gas a velocity profile with less change from the bottom to the top of the well. Low pressure gas wells have a dramatic change in velocity from the bottom to the top of the well. Average plunger rise velocity is monitored by most controllers, but impact speed at the surface is generally not known. Data collected on a low pressure well will show very high impact velocities can occur. As gas wells are produced to lower reservoir and lower gathering pressures, more and more wells are becoming low pressure wells. The operator must be concerned about high velocity plunger impacts, due to the potential for damage and greater risk. Point of impact speed is generally not known and this lack of knowledge leads to a false sense of security. Bumper spring and lubricator assemblies are designed to stop the plunger at the surface and prevent damage. Rather than continue “crashing” into striker blocks, let’s move them out of the way. Instead of driving your truck into the wall and building bigger bumpers, quit driving into the wall. The concept of lubricator extension is a mechanism that can be used to stop the impact of fast arriving plungers. The feature of extending the lubricator to stop a plunger was observed during laboratory testing at the full scale well model. Features of the lubricator extension are the plunger must clear the top outlet to allow for chamber compression and some liquid must be present. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 16 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Presentation Title: IV – 4 Company(ies): Comparison of Plunger Fall Model to Echometer Company Field Data PL Tech T-RAM Canada Author(s): lynn@echometer.com Lynn Rowlan James F. Lea Carolyn Cepuch Rick Nadkrynechny James McCoy Abstract: Session: IV --- Plunger Lift A new plunger fall velocity model has been developed that predicts a plunger fall velocity in a well as different pressure conditions. This model is based on filed measured plunger fall velocities and laboratory measured fall velocity. All plungers have the same general trend of fall velocity; where the plunger fall velocity is fast at low pressure and slow at high pressure. Data acquired from various wells will be used to compare the measured fall velocity of different types of plungers to the predicted fall velocity by the new model. Some construction features of plungers cause a plunger to fall rapidly, while other features cause the plunger to have a slower fall velocity. A particular plunger’s known fall velocity at a specific pressure and temperature is input into the model and the model will calculate the fall velocity at other pressures and temperatures. Published fall velocities can be used for each plunger type but may not be accurate for all wells, because fall velocity is significantly impacted by well pressure. By accurately knowing the plunger fall velocity, the proper shut-in time for the plunger lift installation can be determined. Use of an acoustic instrument is an effective method to determine a fall velocity during the shut-in time period for input into the model. When changes to the well cycle impact the operating pressure, this new model can be used to determine the change in time required for the plunger to fall to bottom during shut-in. Setting the well’s controller to have the shortest possible shut-in time can maximize oil and gas production from the plunger lift well. Determining the plunger fall velocity will allow the operator to set the minimum shut-in time for the plunger lift installation. Knowing the plunger fall velocity for specific well conditions will ensure that the plunger will reach the bottom of the tubing by the end of the shut-in period. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 17 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Presentation Title: IV – 5 Company(ies): Dynamic IPR and Gas Flow Rate De- Echometer Company termined for Conventional Plunger Lift Well Author(s): Contact Information: Lynn Rowlan Lynn@echometer.com Abstract: Session: IV --- Plunger Lift The tubing and casing pressure acquired during a conventional plunger lift well’s cycle can be used to determine the Inflow Performance Relationship for the well and calculate the gas flow rate from the formation and down the flow line. If the tubing and casing volume from the end of the tubing to the surface is thought of as a closed volume, then the change in gas volume can be calculated from the measured surface pressures. The cumulative production from the formation and the instantaneous gas flow rate down the flow line can be computed from the measured pressures, gas properties, and height of the gas free liquid in the tubing, plus the wellbore configuration. Gas flow from the formation occurs during the entire cycle whether the flow line valve is open or closed, as long as the flowing BHP is less than the reservoir pressure. Generally there are two peak instantaneous gas flow rates down the flow line, one peak occurs at the beginning of the unloading period when the flow line valve is first opened and a second peak gas flow rate occurs at the beginning of the afterflow period immediately after the plunger arrives at the surface. The initial high gas flow rate is due to gas stored in the tubing above the plunger and the second high gas flow rate is due to gas accumulated behind the plunger which lifted the plunger and liquid to the surface. In a conventional plunger lift well these calculated instantaneous gas flow rates are reasonably accurate. If there is high gas velocities in the tubing, then the frictional effects can cause gas to stack in the tubing then the flow rate is impacted by pressure drop due to friction. The Dynamic IPR of the well determined from one complete conventional plunger lift cycle can be used to calculate the flow from the formation when the flow line valve is open or closed. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 18 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Session: IV --- Plunger Lift Presentation Title: IV – 6 Plunger Lift Report Card Author(s): Rick Nadkrynechny Lynn Rowlan Carolyn Cepuch Abstract: Technical Presentations Session Chair: John Green Bill Hearn Company(ies): T-RAM Canada Echometer Company Contact Information: lynn@echometer.com A new software tool allows the operator to generate a report card on his Plunger Lifted well. Data can be manually entered into the system or loaded from an EXCEL plunger inspection form that has been performed on location at the well site. A Plunger Wizard button provides interactive help for inputting the well’s current plunger information. Once you have the complete well information, then click grade to view the results examine any apparent issues. Suggestions for improving operation of the well will be listed in the results box. This system provides a systematic approach to identifying and solving plunger lift problems. Following are examples of several report card suggestions: 1) There appears to be an unnecessary pressure drop of 234kPa between the wellhead and separator. Check for things like undersized choke trim or hydrates in line. 2) An average orifice differential of 1670kPa is a high for optimal performance. If possible an increase in orifice plate size would help increase production. 3) One or more arrival speeds was greater then 300m/min, which depending on plunger mass is dangerous. Think about looking into why this happened and ensure it doesn’t happen regularly. 4) Your fast shut down time of 6.5min allows for arrival velocities up to 387m/min. Depending on plunger mass, this can be dangerous and can result in damaged equipment. Consider lowering this to something near 11.2min. 5) There are factors that can cause non arrivals where it may be necessary to shut down the well. These factors can include: The plunger may not be dropping, which can load up the well, or the plunger may actually be arriving and not be sensed by the controller which can cause damage to equipment. 6) It is important to gauge the cap threads to check for signs of stretching caused by possible high force impacts. 7) A passing choke can cause the well to load up during the off cycle by allowing liquid and gas to continue to enter the tubing. The valve needs to be serviced. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 19 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 1 Company(ies): Optimizing Chemical Injection ABB Totalflow Author(s): Contact Information: Dave Barry dave.barry@us.abb.com Abstract: I have developed a program to optimize chemicals. The first installation was on a Chesapeake location and they reported that they cut chemical usage by 85% and increased production by 35%. As you may know Chesapeake has been cutting back and sadly they shut this well in. We are presently installing some for ConocoPhillips and BHP with several other companies very interested. The installations we have done have been with the TXAM pumps. I am sure someone from TXAM or one of the producing companies would want to join me, if this presentation is approved. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 20 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 2 Company(ies): Foamer Application to Optimize Nalco Company Production of Horizontal Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Fenfen Huang, et al fhuang@nalco.com Abstract: Efficient and effective removal of liquid in the low gas rate natural gas wells is key in optimizing the tail-end production. Many mechanical and chemical artificial lift methods have been successfully utilized by the oil and gas industry to manage the liquid deliquification for mature vertical gas wells with the aid of various modeling tools to predict the liquid loading. Horizontal drilling has played a critical role in the development of the natural gas shale plays. For the horizontallydrilled natural gas wells, their undulating trajectory with low spots for liquid accumulation, and/or deeper well toe than the heel, can cause earlier onset of liquid loading and also complicate the understanding and deliquification remedy of these wells compared to vertical wells. While mechanisms and modeling of liquid loading in horizontal wells have attracted interest of many studies, this presentation will focus on the application of chemical foamers to optimize the production of horizontal natural gas wells. Laboratory development of the chemical solutions, technology execution in the field, and successful case studies illustrating benefits gained from the chemical foamer program in horizontal wells will be demonstrated. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 21 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 3 Company(ies): Chemical Pellet Trials BP Author(s): Contact Information: Paul Nguyen Paul.Nguyen@bp.com Abstract: Chemical Pellet is a solid controlled-release additive that slowly desorbs overtime. In brine water it is slow dissolving, producing a continuous treatment to inhibit scale/paraffin. The BP Operation Team is currently facing challenges with: 1) Cost and timing of installation. 2) Maintaining current continuous injection. a. Refilling chemical (PM work). We found wells that have injection but no chemical. b. There are wells with injection but it’s not working. 3) Frequency of batch treatment not clearly communicated. a. Missed bi-weekly batch treatment. b. Wells that are waiting for rig work are continuously being batched without any production. 4) Treatment effectiveness. a. Batch treatment causing wells to log off. b. The rate of continuous treatment has to manually adjusted overtime. Chemical Pellet will benefit the following: 1) Significantly reduce field personnel’s exposure to hazardous chemical and mechanical equipment associated with continuous chemical injectors. 2) Reduce well work relating to stuck/plug tubing due to scale/paraffin. 3) Reduce maintenance failure that can result to rig work. 4) Directly treat the downhole wellbore. 5) Rate of treatment will depend solely on water rate. Evaluation process includes: 1) Economic over 10 years comparing Continuous Injection vs. Batch Treating vs. Chemical Pellet 2) Pressure Loss Gradient from Prosper to evaluate pressure loss between the sand-screen and seating nipple. Thus, evaluate risks of losing gas rate due to friction. 3) Evaluate MSDS with HSE and Corrosion Engineers to ensure no corrosion or safety risk with this product. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 22 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 4 Company(ies): Foam Injection via Capillary String Shell EP in Vicksburg Dry Gas Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Adam Pitman Chandran.peringod@shell.com Abstract: Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 23 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 5 Company(ies): Correlating Laboratory Approaches Multi-Chem, A Halliburton Service to Foamer Product Selection for Gas Well Deliquification Author(s): Contact Information: Shane Rorex shane.rorex@halliburton.com Abstract: Proper product selection is critical when designing a liquid foamer treatment program for gas well deliquification. The proper liquid foamer can provide an incremental increase in gas production by working at the interface between liquid and gas to lower the overall density of reservoir fluids and lower the critical rate for that well, allowing large volumes of fluid to be removed from the wellbore. Liquid foamers are typically selected based on the results of foam testing using live reservoir fluids. Foam height and stability are important criteria that are practically correlated to the efficacy of the well deliquification. For this project, an additional approach is introduced for determining compatibility between reservoir fluids and liquid foamers and correlating the laboratory results to the field performance. By comparing the results of surface tension testing on different liquid foamer base materials, different concentrations, and different synthetic brines, we have found that the foamer performance can be correlated to its dynamic diffusion behavior to the interface between air and brines and stability of critical micelle concentration. This information can be used in conjunction with field foam testing to more accurately predict the expected field performance of a particular liquid foamer Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 24 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: V --- Chemicals --- SelecSession Chair: tion, Installation, Optimization Fenfen Huang Presentation Title: V – 6 Company(ies): To the Heel and Beyond with Soap Pro-Seal Lift Sticks Author(s): Contact Information: Dan Casey dan@prosealinc.com Abstract: Contrary to a popular misconception, the gas well operator should not send the soap stick into the rat-hole and the requirement to shut-in a flowing gas well is the exception, not the rule. Horizontal completions present a challenge to proven artificial lift methods but, if used correctly, soap sticks remain the first choice solution for low cost, early, effective intervention. For the purpose of de-watering with soap sticks, this paper will define the transition from vertical to horizontal profile (it changes), when the well must be shut-in, the duration of shut-in if required, the quantity of soap sticks to use, the depth at which the stick is to land and the preferred frequency of use. The author has assisted in the deployment of 8 to 10 million soap sticks in the past 12 years over every major basin in the US. This presentation will explode certain fallacies related to the use of soap sticks and offer details on the best use of soap sticks over the wide variety of gas wells extant. Examples will include the successful use of soap sticks in tubingless completions when running tubing is difficult or expensive. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 25 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VI --- Automation, Optimi- Session Chair: zation Scott Campbell Presentation Title: VI – 1 Company(ies): Choke Management in Tight Gas Acock Engineering Reservoirs Author(s): Contact Information: Sheldon Cote sheldon.cote@bp.com Abstract: Choke management is a strategy utilized in higher pressure wells (+600 psi shut in pressures) to maintain constant and stable flow at the wellhead. The strategy is used on new and old wells where reservoir pressure is preserved. A choke is implemented to stabilize initial flow backs at completion and during regular production phases on older wells. The strategy utilizes a choke or flow control valve in the flow stream at surface. The choke is managed to control flowing wellhead pressures above sales or line pressures while minimizing rate deferral. Choke management helps protect against line pressure increases. The choke model is controlled either manually or through automated control and algorithm. The intent of choke model is to stabilize instantaneous flow rates on new wells, and flatten decline on existing wells. The strategy works well in both high and low LGR wells. Stabilized instantaneous flow helps protect newly placed stimulations and allows for better control over surface facilities and flow management. When managed properly the strategy can flatten decline on higher pressure wells with higher fluid rates. Choke management has shown the ability to naturally flow wells with LGR's as high as 400 Bbls/mill. Choke management also helps keep condensate in phase downhole minimizing dropout and added flowing friction in the wellbore. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 26 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VI --- Automation, Optimi- Session Chair: zation Scott Campbell Presentation Title: VI – 2 Company(ies): Closed Loop Control of Free FlowApplied Control Equipment ing Gas Wells Author(s): Contact Information: Al Majek jschrader@appliedcntrl.com Mark Mauk Mike Gabel Abstract: Sizable drilling programs in the shale plays of North America have bought about a massive number of free flowing wells. Maintaining optimal performance for so many sites can prove to be a formidable challenge. To fulfill this need, producers have flow from each well manipulated via a single automated choke valve. The primary focus of the system is to maintain a steady flow from the well to the sales line based on an operator entered set point. Multiple overrides come into play based upon operating conditions. Measurements include delta pressure and flow rate from an orifice run feeding a sales pipeline, and static pressure and temperature of the flow line feeding a separator. Specific issues addressed include start-up sequencing, liquid loading, maintaining critical velocity, and transient flow conditions. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 27 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VI --- Automation, Optimi- Session Chair: zation Scott Campbell Presentation Title: VI – 3 Company(ies): Plunger Lift I/O Freewave Technologies Author(s): Contact Information: Jim Gardner jdouglas@catapultpr-ir.com Abstract: Artificial lift technologies are increasingly popular for optimizing upstream solutions such as oil and gas production. The objective of artificial lift is to allow oil and gas producers to automate and optimize well production, as well as minimizes maintenance and life cycle costs. The key to artificial lift is to build enough downhole pressure to lift the fluid to the surface. In order to improve this process, producers utilize a plunger, or valve, to assist with lifting the fluid. Oil and gas measurement and automation technicians and engineers have been tasked with retrieving more data and doing more with less. However, new drilling and production technologies have created the need for new automation techniques. The conventional approach of putting a flow computer or controller (RTU and PLC) on each well head quickly becomes redundant, and excessively expensive. The integration of new production technology created a need for advanced automation techniques, particularly with wireless instrumentation. With new wireless input/output (I/O) technology, operators can easily install and manage an automated plunger lift system. There are dozens of wireless instrumentation products that have come into the market over the past 5 years. Manufacturers have risen to the challenge of creating new products to provide new solutions to the automation challenge. Each manufacturer has taken a different approach to solving these challenges. Understanding your data requirements and matching the differing products to your application is what you really need to consider. This presentation will explore a new approach and new criteria for automated plunger lift and will aim to help producers understand the needs of their own system. Additionally, a focus on the communication layers of a system will help attendees understand the value of wireless I/O and learn how to eliminate redundancies and enable fail safe capabilities in case communication is lost. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 28 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VI --- Automation, Optimi- Session Chair: zation Scott Campbell Presentation Title: VI – 4 Company(ies): Hybrid Communication Networks Freewave Technologies Author(s): Contact Information: Dan Steele jdouglas@catapultpr-ir.com Abstract: The concept of automation is a primary driver of competitiveness for all types of organizations, but, increasingly it is critical for oil and gas companies looking to improve upon their pipeline monitoring efforts. These companies have faced countless regulatory compliance issues, especially due to recurring accidents and events that have made front page news. This has elevated concerns to the extent that government entities across the world continue to produce legislation directed specifically toward improving safety standards in regards to corrosion and cathodic protection (CP) practices. In an industry saturated with many pipeline monitoring solutions, it is critical for operators to understand which technologies are best suited for their pipeline infrastructure and its impact on their CP efforts. Sometimes, it makes the most sense to take a hybrid approach and leverage several solutions for a company’s asset monitoring needs. Obviously, the key building block to a cost-effective, pipeline integrity, corrosion protection program is vital, timely monitoring and reporting of CP data. There are several data communication technologies available today to help automate key functions within an organization, including, cellular, satellite, licensed and spread spectrum wireless data radios, fiber and wire. Traditionally, companies with large geographically dispersed communication networks typically have selected one technology, one source, one vendor to collect, retrieve and report data to assess the health of their pipeline infrastructures. However, there is a new paradigm today in which organizations are breaking away from tradition and deploying multiple communication technologies to create a hybrid communications network that can better serve an organization’s needs. Now there are many different technologies available to: Drive maintenance/monthly costs down – directly impacting the bottom line, Decrease polling cycle times and reducing the time needed to identify and remedy problems within the network, Eliminate system “pinch points” – or single points of failure. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 29 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VI --- Automation, Optimi- Session Chair: zation Scott Campbell Presentation Title: VI – 5 Company(ies): Fully Automated Fluid Level MeasRAG Rohöl-Aufsuchungs Aktiengesellurement Tool – Applications in Oil schaft Production and Gas Well Dewatering Author(s): Contact Information: Christian Burgstaller Christian.Burgstaller@rag-austria.at Abstract: A fully automated fluid level measurement tool was developed recently. The paper describes the technical features of the tool and summarizes via case studies the results of the field tests on various ESPs (electrical submersible pumps) and sucker rod pumps running with and without VSD (Variable Speed Drive) both in oil production and gas well dewatering applications. The unique feature of this system is its fully automated and purely electronic functioning. The measuring device is enclosed, mounted on the casing valve, has a pressure rating of 5000 psi and works with zero emissions on the environment (no outlet of casing gas). Compared with a conventional down hole pressure sensor, mounted on an ESP, the system is insensitive to high well fluid temperatures and simple to maintain due to its easy access on surface location. It additionally has a sampling rate of down to one measurement per minute. The measured fluid level data can be transmitted via a SCADA system. The measurement tool can be run down hole pumps in a more safe way. It can be used to avoid pump-off conditions and the resulting serious equipment damage. It can also be used to control a VSD to keep the fluid level in a well at a specific depth to avoid down hole flow conditions below the bubble point pressure in oil production. Due to the availability of online fluid level data, all kind of pumps (e.g. ESP, Sucker Rod, PCP, and Jet Pump) can be operated safely at more aggressive production rates. Furthermore possible applications of acoustic well diagnosis, also a feature of the tool, which is currently under scientific investigation, are presented. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 30 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VII --- Pumps, ESP, PCP, Session Chair: Hydraulic Rob Sutton Presentation Title: VII – 1 Company(ies): Hybrid Hydraulic Dewatering: Lower Cormorant Engineering Cost – Increased Prod. Author(s): Contact Information: Dave Bolt Travis@cormorant.us.com Ken Newman Travis Bolt Abstract: Cormorant Engineering developed a new method of hydraulic deliquification. The system addresses the problems that arise with fitting a dual acting pump into production tubing. Traditional dual acting hydraulic pumps require three conduits. This is costly and typically unfeasible in through tubing applications. Cormorant has developed in conjunction with Conoco Phillips a new method for achieving a dual acting system with a single acting pump. This new system (referred to as a 1.5 acting system) allows a single acting pump deployed with single coiled tubing yet operates as a double acting system. The system operates through a patented power down pump that allows for optimized area ratios that virtually offset the density difference in oil and water. The power down pump minimizes moving parts and complex flow paths, helping to decrease risk of failure. The combination of the two concepts allows hydraulic dewatering applications for depths up to 15K while maintaining a hydraulic pressure less than 3000 psi. The 1.5 system operates like a traditional single acting system by applying and releasing hydraulic pressure as well as alternating the pressure on the produced water conduit. This action turns a single acting hydraulic pump into a dual acting pump while maintain the simplicity of a single acting pump. This system allows for a 50% to 100% increase in produced fluid production over a traditional single acting system, while maintaining the downhole cost of a single acting system. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 31 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VII --- Pumps, ESP, PCP, Session Chair: Hydraulic Rob Sutton Presentation Title: VII – 2 Company(ies): Factors that Affect the Reliability of UPCO, Inc. Couplings Author(s): Contact Information: Erik Tietz ASriraman@upcoinc.com Arun Sriraman Abstract: Failures in the sucker rod industry can be costly and time consuming. As an end user in this industry, it is very critical to understand the mechanics behind couplings. This paper addresses some of the important aspects of couplings which play an important role in the overall reliability of the rod string. The topics addressed in this presentation are as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Strength of material analysis of coupling and sucker rods. What happens to a sucker rod coupling joint during an improper make up process? Types of manufacturing processes for couplings. Recommended field practices. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 32 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VII --- Pumps, ESP, PCP, Session Chair: Hydraulic Rob Sutton Presentation Title: VII – 3 Company(ies): Evaluation and Performance of Echometer Packer-Type Downhole Gas Separa- Univ. of Texas tors Author(s): Contact Information: Jim McCoy jim@echometer.com A. L. Podio O.L. Rowlan D. Becker Abstract: Many downhole gas separators are inefficient, and the percentage of liquid in the pump is actually less than the percentage of liquid in the fluids in the casing annulus surrounding the gas separator. This presentation discusses a new packer type gas separator design increases separation capacity and efficiency. The separator design can be used with a conventional packer or a special pack-off assembly consisting of elastomer rings on a tube positioned between the separator and the tubing anchor below the separator. The pressure drop across the separator is generally less than 10 psi so flexible elastomer rings can be used instead of a high pressure packer. The separator is generally used with a tubing anchor, and the tubing anchor should be positioned immediately below the separator instead of above the separator, because field data indicates that the tubing anchor can cause an accumulation of gas below the tubing anchor and considerable liquid accumulation above the tubing anchor. A separation technique that diverts the formation fluids into the casing annulus above the pump inlet is used to increase gas separation from liquids efficiently by using the larger area in the tubing/casing annulus. A seating nipple is positioned within inches of the liquids that exist in the casing annulus surrounding the gas separator to reduce the pressure drop so that gas is not released from the oil that flows from the casing annulus into the pump chamber. This presentation describes techniques for evaluating the effectiveness of downhole gas separators. Often times, the evaluation of a separator’s performance is based on pump fillage and the total gas production from the well instead of the amount of gas present in the gaseous liquid column that exists in the casing annulus surrounding the pump. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 33 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VII --- Pumps, ESP, PCP, Session Chair: Hydraulic Rob Sutton Presentation Title: VII – 4 Company(ies): Selection of Downhole Gas SeparaEchometer Company tor University of Texas Author(s): Contact Information: Jim McCoy Lynn@echometer.com Tony Podio Lynn Rowlan D. Becker Abstract: Selection of a properly sized downhole gas separator is critical for efficient trouble-free operation of sucker rod pumps used in deliquification of gas wells. When feasible to correct inefficient downhole gas separation, the first attempt should be to set the pump below the gas entry zone. This is the most efficient method of downhole gas separation. However, in horizontal wells the pump cannot be set below the gas entry zone, and a gas separator should be used below the pump that offers efficient gas/liquid separation. Downhole gas separators can be divided into different types. If the gas separator is placed below the gas entry zone, a single dip tube type of a gas separator should be used below the pump’s seating nipple. If the gas separator is placed in or above the fluid entry zone, then for lower capacity wells a gas separator assembly should be used that consists of an outer barrel having ports at the top of the barrel with a dip tube extending from the pump inlet down into the outer barrel and opening below the ports. If a higher capacity gas separator is required, then the formation fluids must be diverted into the larger diameter casing annulus for gas separation. One of the most basic ideas to consider is the separation of gas from liquid is achieved through GRAVITY separation without the introduction of other mechanisms (centrifugal forces, nozzles, etc.). Also, when the velocity of the gas flow is too high, then turbulence and mixing of the gas and liquid will be detrimental to the separation process. This presentation will provide guidance in the proper selection of downhole gas separator. Discussing the impact of gas entry zone, liquid rate, pump capacity, gas velocity, casing pressure buildup, and other critical parameters that impact the selection of a gas separator. Notes: 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Page 34 2013 Gas Well Deliquification Workshop Technical Presentations Session: VII --- Pumps, ESP, PCP, Session Chair: Hydraulic Rob Sutton Presentation Title: VII – 5 Company(ies): Wellbore Gas/Liquid Separation Muleshoe Engineering Author(s): Contact Information: David Simpson zdas04@muleshoe-eng.com Abstract: Field observations have shown for many years that on pumping wells it is very common for the gas flowing up the tubing/casing annulus to be free of liquid. This has been especially noticeable when the downhole pump was directed to an on-site tank or to a water gathering system. Many operators have interpreted this observation to imply that the annular space is acting as a separator--a very long skinny separator that has fairly poor separation efficiency per unit length, but that has a lot of unit lengths. This paper evaluates some of the critical flow models to determine the flow rates that would allow a well to flow to sales without an on-site separator. The other side of the coin is the gas that flows through the pump. Every pump allows some amount of gas to flow with the pumped liquid, but historically producers have had to accept this “pumped gas” as a necessary evil and live with very high water-gathering pressure, excessive gas in produced water tanks, and lost revenue. This paper concludes with a discussion of a technique to allow the power of the downhole pump to recover pumped gas for sale. Notes: