ECD/LS End of Project Evaluation Terms of Reference Design Monitoring and Evaluation Unit World Vision Haiti 1 Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 3 B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 3 i. Context ..................................................................................................................................... 4 ii. Summary of the Project………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….4 C. END OF PROJECT EVALUATION ............................................................................................ 7 i. Purpose of the study ................................................................................................................. 7 ii. Specific objectives ................................................................................................................... 7 iii. Indicators to be measured ...................................................................................................... 8 iv. Performance factor ................................................................................................................. 8 v. Suggested research methodology ........................................................................................... 9 vi. Key stakeholders .................................................................................................................... 9 vii. Evaluation limitations ............................................................................................................. 9 viii . Report outline ..................................................................................................................... 10 ix. Evaluation timeframe ............................................................................................................. 11 C. EXPRESSION OF INTEREST .................................................................................................. 11 i. Required expertise, skills and experience .............................................................................. 11 ii. Application procedures .......................................................................................................... 11 ANNEXES .................................................................................................................................... 12 2 A. INTRODUCTION This document aims to give clear instructions on the process of the evaluation of the ECDLS Project. It has been elaborated by the team of DME as well as revised and corrected by the project team. It contains information on the objectives of the study, the deliverables, the methodology, the resources and the schedule proposed. The consultant will work with the program manager and the DME team. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project title: Early Childhood & Development Learning Spaces (ECDLS) Goal Earthquake-affected Children in Haiti have improved access to quality holistic early childhood education and learning programs Geographical area targeted: Type and no. of beneficiaries targeted: Sectors: Departement de l’Ouest, Haïti : Communes of Delmas, Pétion-Ville 500 former ECDLS/ CFS beneficiaries aged 3-8 years old 30 schools based in Petionville and Delmas, 100 early childhood classes WaSH and Education Implementation Period: Budget October 2011 – December 2012 1,970,000 $US 3 i. Context Early Childhood Education (ECE) is the term commonly used to describe the formal teaching and care of young children by people other than their family or in settings outside of the home. ECE focuses on providing a solid foundation for social, physical, intellectual, creative, and emotional development. Early Childhood has been defined as a period of life between 0 to 6 years of age. This is the period of greatest growth and development, when the brain develops most rapidly, almost at its fullest. It is a period when walking, talking, self-esteem, vision of the world and moral foundations are established. Child development is the basis of human development. It is connected with living with dignity and achieving quality of life. The early years of life are critical to the development of intelligence, personality and social behavior. Research on brain development attests to the importance of key mental, physical and social capabilities. If these fundamental capabilities are not well established from the start, and especially if neurological damage occurs, the learning potential is adversely affected. Early Childhood Education focuses on children learning through play. UNESCO advocates for Early Childhood Care and Education (ECCE) programs that attend to health, nutrition, security and learning and which provide for children's holistic development. World Vision’s ECD Learning Spaces are part of a range of programs that promote inclusive education and child protection. ii. Summary of the project Immediately following the earthquake, World Vision began to establish Early Childhood Development Learning Spaces in various camps throughout Port Au Prince. For the past year and half, WV supported over 1,100 boys and girls ages 3 to 8 years old. The ECD LS’s provided a safe space to learn while meeting the psychological and emotional needs of children directly affected by the earthquake. With the help of community members, parents, and local animators, children benefited from the services offered by the ECD Learning Spaces. However, families have to move back into their home or new host communities since camps are closing down. Many parents are still facing problems sending their children back to school, with money being their number one constraint. In order to continue to support and protect these former beneficiaries in their new living environment WV implements since October 2011 a project in 30 schools of Petionville and Delmas entitled: Early Childhood Development and Learning Space. The main objective of this project is: to improve access to quality to holistic education programs in Petionville and Delmas for children, and the specific objectives are: to increase access to Early Childhood Education for children aged between 4 to 7 years old who are currently not in school, to improve capacity of parents, teachers and communities to undertake, participate and better manage Early Childhood Development Learning, to improve access and knowledge in appropriate sanitation and hygiene practices among ECD children in school. To achieve these objectives the project go through the realization of several activities including: rehabilitation and construction of classrooms, installation of tanks for water supply, installation of hand-washing station, construction or rehabilitation of latrines in targeted schools, distribution of school supplies and educational material to 30 schools, training of teachers of ECD classes, training for parents, members of the schools committee on participation and management of ECD education, awareness session for parents and members of communities on the right to education, and finally the training of children on basic hygiene practices. This project is being implemented in 30 schools providing: ECD furniture, construction, rehabilitation, didactic materials, training, 500 ECD students aged 4 to 7 years old (no tuition fee, didactic materials distribution, and sensitization), 100 ECD teachers (training on Tipa Tipa ECE teaching method) and 500 parents (training on children rights to education). To enable a better implementation of the project, WV has established partnership with the directors of 30 schools and with a firm specializing in educational training on Early Childhood Education for teachers, parents, school directors and other institutions: Tipa Tipa. Tipa Tipa has to train teachers to its ECE classes teaching method, support them by providing adequate tools to monitor children behavior and learning. Tipa Tipa also has to train parents on children rights to education. 4 This project for a total cost of US 1,870,000 is funded by WV Germany and WV Netherland. It extends from October 2011 to December 2012. Ultimate Outcome Earthquake-affected Children in Haiti have improved access to quality holistic early childhood education and learning programs Immediate Outcome Increased access to formal early childhood education for children aged between 4 to 7 years old who are currently not in school and have previously benefited from WV ECDLS activities in camps Capacity of parents and teachers from targeted schools to engage in, participate in and better manage Early Childhood Development Learning is improved Access and Knowledge in appropriate sanitation and hygiene practices improved among ECD children in targeted schools Output ECD classrooms constructed and rehabilitatio n of schools supported in 30 schools, with priority being given to ECD need 30 schools provided didactic materials following the Ministry of Education's guidelines Tipa Tipa training in ECD conducte d for 100 teachers from 30 targeted schools, with preferen ce for ECD teachers Ageappropriate ECD and other school furniture provided to 30 schools 500 former WV ECDLS beneficiaries aged 4-7 are registered and enrolled in formal ECD classes in Ministryapproved schools Tipa Tipa has conducted Awareness sessions on children’s right to education especially early childhood development for parents of former camp children enrolled in targeted schools 5 Water tanks installed in 30 schools Latrines constructed and rehabilitated in 23, including handwashing stations and rain-water harvesting systems in 9 schools where indicated Children benefiting from ECDLS education in targeted schools sensitized to improved hygiene practices Key activities include: Schools Education WASH Students (aged 3-7) Work with school directors to identify existing needs in term of furniture and didactic materials Obtain official Government list of ECD materials Buy and distribute didactic materials in 30 schools Buy and distribute furniture in 30 schools Monitor and verify school attendance records on a weekly basis TipaTipa to Conduct Trainings for teachers Tipa Tipa to carry out an end of year evaluation of the teachers Assess school needs for construction and rehabilitation Obtain approval from relevant Government authorities Obtain approval from relevant Government authorities for classrooms construction and rehabilitation Initiate procurement and select contractors Supervise construction and rehabilitation process, paying attention in particular to national standards and child protection considerations Assess school needs for construction and rehabilitation of latrines Obtain approval from relevant Government authorities Obtain approval from relevant Government authorities for latrines construction and rehabilitation Initiate procurement and select contractors Supervise construction and rehabilitation process, paying attention in particular to national standards and child protection considerations Procure 30 400 galloon tuft tanks Deliver the Tuft Tanks Support schools who do not have sufficient funds to install the tanks on their own Distribution of hygiene kit. 6 Place 500 former ECDLS beneficiaries in 30 school free of charge Distribute didactic materials kit) Conduct mini-training for teachers on ECD materials Tipa Tipa to Conduct/train parents on child rights to education Tipa Tipa to conduct initial assessment of children placed in the schools Tipa Tipa to develop foundational life skill domain checklist for teacher reports based on approved ECD materials from MENFP Tipa Tipa to conduct end of year assessment of children ECDLS coordinators demonstrate and explain good hygiene practices to ECDLS children C. END OF PROJECT EVALUATION Evaluation type: End of Project Evaluation Period to be covered by October 2011 – December 2012 evaluation: Proposed methodology: WV proposes the use of qualitative and quantitative research methods in gathering information from a wide array of sources. i. Purpose of the Study The proposed study is an End of Project Evaluation of the ECDLS project. It will evaluate the project in its different components: distribution of furniture and didactic materials, training of the teachers, parents and children construction and rehabilitation of class rooms, construction and rehabilitation of latrines and will provide an analysis of the extent to which the project met its objectives. The evaluation will also assess the project’s overall performance using criteria such as Impact, Relevance and Appropriateness, Productivity, Community Participation, and Integration of interventions. Findings from the evaluation will be shared with WV Netherlands and WV Germany and used to report on the project’s impact. This evaluation will further inform World Vision Haiti’s future programming with earthquake affected populations in the Port au Prince Area and raise lessons and best practices for future projects carried out within the World Vision partnership on ECDLS programming. ii. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Specific Objectives Evaluate and validate the project’s achievements with regards to implementation targets and milestones; Examine the effectiveness of the project in terms of its purpose and intended outcomes; Evaluate the relevance and appropriateness of the strategy and activities implemented; Investigate the project’s coherence to in-country policies and practices, as well as humanitarian and internationally recognised norms and practices; Investigate the level of coordination with internal and external actors in terms of planning, resource management and implementation. Evaluate the project’s implementation efficiency and document constraints and challenges faced by the implementation team; Evaluate the project’s coverage in terms of reaching the most vulnerable groups of children; Ascertain the impact (positive, negative, intended, unintended etc) the project had on target communities; Examine to what extent crosscutting themes were integrated into the project and results achieved; Together with various stakeholders, document important lessons learned and best practices; Suggest strategic and operational recommendations that can be used by WVI in ongoing and future projects. Evaluate how the WV code of conduct and other standards were mainstreamed in the project. Evaluate the relationship between the standards of education in emergencies INEE compared to the ECD/LS project. 7 iii. Indicators to be measured % of targeted schools offered appropriate early childhood education by project end (age-appropriate classrooms / furniture / didactic material, ECD-trained teachers) % of ECD teachers in targeted schools utilizing improved tools to monitor physical, social, cognitive and emotional foundational life skill domains. % of trained parents reporting improved knowledge on child rights to education % of targeted ECD students that can tell at least 3 times when it is critical to wash hands. % of targeted ECD students that report they have used the latrines and hand-washing stations at their school within the past two days. iv. Performance factors The project will be evaluated based on the following performance factors: Impact Relevance - To what extent did the project reduce the vulnerability of earthquake affected individuals in early childhood education - To what extent was this directly due to the intervention and / or other factors? - What were some of the unplanned and/or negative impacts of the project and how did these affect the overall impact? - How did the integration of several technical components/sectors impact of the project? and Appropriateness Productivity Participation Recommendation for - To what extent did the project respond to the education needs of the population - Was the assistance provided adapted and timely? - To what extent were project resources, capabilities and selected strategies adapted to the needs and local context? - To what extent did the project adhere to international and national standards? - To what extent did the project harness, develop the capacities and address the different needs, interests and vulnerabilities of affected women and men, girls and boys? - Describe any new or innovative ideas or approaches that the project explored or implemented to achieve its expected results? - To what extent were activities’ costs justified by their outputs/results? - Were there any implementation delays and why? - To what extent did the project identify and mitigate risk in the implementing environment? - To what extent were the individuals and groups reached consistent with the program's intended beneficiaries? How were vulnerable communities and beneficiaries identified? How were vulnerable communities and beneficiaries selected, and who selected Them? Was the selection process transparent, fair and free from interference? Was the beneficiary verification process adequate/appropriate? - To what extent did World Vision involve beneficiaries in the design, delivery and monitoring of the project? - To what extent did World Vision cooperate with local actors? - To what extent did World Vision coordinate its activities with other Non Governmental Organization and State Actors? - How would you recommend continuing to work with this group of beneficiaries? future programming 8 v. Suggested research methodology Attached to this Term of Reference are key project documents, assessments and strategy documents for desk review. The consultant is expected to spend the evaluation period in country and present a draft report as well as collect primary data from key project stakeholders before departure. World Vision recommends that the consultant uses both qualitative and quantitative methods to collect this data. The consultant is expected to submit a work plan within the first 3 days of assignment and to confirm the study methodology, tools and sample size with the project manager and DME unit. The consultant will have the sole responsibility for the hiring, training, supervision and payment of the enumerators’ needed for this study. Upon request, World Vision may recommend people who were engaged in similar studies previously, but it will be the responsibility of the consultant to select and manage these enumerators. Logistical support such as transport and office use will need to be agreed upon before the study is initiated. vi. Key stakeholders It is expected that the consultant(s) will consult various stakeholders for this study. Suggested stakeholders include: Project Manager: The Project Manager has led the project since its beginning and will be a key source for background information, data and key documentation. The Project Manager will also be responsible for approving the consultant’s work plan and methodology as well as for coordinating and communicating with internal and external project stakeholders on the study. Sector Managers: The consultant is encouraged to engage with the Advocacy Manager, Camp Coordination Manager, Camp Transition Manager, CTU/LMMS Manager and HAT Manager. Design, Monitoring and Evaluation (DME) Unit: The DME Unit has coordinated the monitoring of the project. The Unit will be responsible for reviewing the consultant’s work plan and methodology and will be available to support the consultant through the evaluation process. Program Officer: The Program Officer will also be available to support the consultant through the evaluation process. Beneficiaries: The project has targeted a number of beneficiaries. The consultant is expected to actively involve project beneficiaries in the study. Project Partners: The project was implemented in coordination with a number of partners (DINEPA, MENFP, School directors, DGS, Tipa Tipa). The consultant is expected to seek their input for this Study. vii. Evaluation Limitations Given that the project has not been renewed for this year, some beneficiaries may have change school and will not be available. In addition, some teachers trained may have changed school or simply quit teaching. Some stakeholders may not be available at the time of the evaluation. 9 viii. Report Outline World Vision will discuss with the successful consultant(s) the content and length of the final report. Below, however, is a suggested outline. Section Contents Title Page Title page to include name of project being evaluated, geographical location of project, dates of evaluation and name(s) of evaluators Acknowledgements List of people who participated in the evaluation (directly and indirectly) Affirmation As required by WVI Executive Summary Summary of the report, highlighting key findings as pertaining to outcomes and recommendations Table of contents List of content as captured in this table List of Tables List of all tables referenced in the text List of Figures List of all figures referenced in the text List of Abbreviations/ Acronyms and definition of terms Acronyms) This is to be provided on a separate page, which follows the title page. Introduction Overview - Introduction and background of the study - Rationale for evaluation - Scope and focus of evaluation Study methodology Methodology - Key questions - Sampling framework - Sources of data - Data analysis method - Sites visited - Meeting held with beneficiaries and stakeholders - Timeline - Limitations Study Findings Overview of findings - Special attention should be paid to changes in the lives of women and progress towards gender equality Lessons learnt List of lessons learnt Conclusions and List of recommendations Recommendations Appendices Terms of Reference Samples of instruments/tools Statistical results List of meetings held List of respondents 10 - References Stories Communication material The consultant will share the final report, once completed, directly with: - World Vision Haiti: ECDLS Project Manager – Valerie Noisette (valerie_noisette@wvi.org) and Jessica DinstilProgram Officer ( Jessica_dinstil@wvi.org) ix. Evaluation Timeframe The evaluation shall be completed and a report submitted within 36 days of signing the contract. The suggested timeline is mentioned below. No Output Responsibility # of Days 1 Finalizing the ToR / Work plan Independent consultant 2 days 2 Development and finalization of tools, Recruitment Independent consultant 4 days and training of data collectors and field testing 3 Data collection Independent consultant 15 days 4 Data entry, Cleaning and analysis Independent consultant 5 days 5 Submission of the draft Report Independent consultant 5 days 6 Submission of the Final Report Independent consultant 5 days D. EXPRESSION OF INTEREST i. Required expertise, skills and experience Masters degree or higher in a relevant field; Experience in Evaluating Education Projects and Programs Minimum 3 years relevant monitoring and evaluation (M&E) experience in developing countries with NGOs working on development/ humanitarian assistance; Expertise and experience in designing, planning and implementing evaluations of humanitarian assistance in complex emergencies; Expertise and experience in designing, planning and implementing qualitative and quantitative research methods, including community-based participatory appraisals in developing countries; Expertise and experience in conducting data analysis using statistical packages; Familiarity with programming in rural and preferably also urban contexts in developing countries; Ability to work under tight schedules with minimal supervision; Ability to impart knowledge, supervise other team members, integrate into a multi-cultural team, and good facilitation skills; Excellent spoken and written English, working knowledge of French preferred; Preferably previous experience in Haiti; Preferably familiar with WVI mission, projects, concepts and tools. 11 ii. Application procedures Interested candidates should send an electronic copy of their CV or resume (indicating a minimum of two relevant professional references), last two evaluation reports, a concept proposal (including research methodology and tools, schedule, logistical requirements and budget), and their expectations in terms of remuneration no later than 23 January 2013 to Mr. Jean Baptiste Yangni, jean-baptiste_yangni@wvi.org. The consultant’s proposed budget should include: Expected remuneration Haitian taxes (20% for companies not registered in Haiti and 2% for registered ones) Airfare Insurance In country accommodation In country meals Payment of enumerators Training of enumerators Office supplies ANNEX 1 – Key Acronyms CIDA CIE ECD DME FGD GoH HAT ICTD ICT4E IDB (also BID) IDP MINUSTAH MoU MENFP NGO (also ONG) UN UNESCO UNICEF USAID WASH WFP WV WVC WVUS Canadian International Development Agency Children in Emergencies Early Childhood Development Design, Monitoring and Evaluation Focus Group Discussion Government of Haiti Humanitarian Accountability Team Information and Communication Technology for Development Information and Communication Technology for Education Inter-American Development Bank Internally Displaced Person Mission des Nations Unies pour la stabilisation en Haïti Memorandum of Understating Ministere Education National et de la Formation Professionel Non Governmental Organization United Nations UN Educational, Scientific, Cultural Organization UN Children’s Fund United States Agency for International Development Water, Sanitation and Hygiene World Food Programme World Vision World Vision Canada World Vision United States 12