26/04/2011 Religious and Political Overtones in Scott‟s Gladiator CLAS3410 Classics on Screen 2010-11 Gladiator‟s success at the box office and near single-handed rejuvenation of cinema concerning the ancient world is due not only to its indulgent violence and visual spectacle, but also to its continuing relevance to modern, particularly American, politics and social climate. The portrayal of political factions such as the Senate, Army, power-hungry ruler and salt-of-the-earth hero are still visible both in real life and fiction. The political shift from Clinton‟s liberal Government to George W. Bush‟s conservative one is mirrored in Commodus‟ usurping of power from the philosophically-minded Marcus Aurelius in Gladiator. And some of the characters have a modern American President to whom they can be correlated. Francesca Ratnage Rory Vieyra The Presidential Mirror Clinton‟s aggressive economic expansion may be reflected in Marcus Aurelius‟ military expansion of the Empire. Marcus seeks to be a good ruler by moving forward, but at the same time he shows no bloody-mindedness: „For twenty five years I have conquered , spilt blood, expanded the Empire … since I became Caesar, I have known four years without war, four years of peace in twenty and for what?‟ When Marcus questions his actions in this way it is hard to equate him with the foolhardy George Bush even though both instigated military campaigns. Commodus is the Emperor who best embodies George Bush. When the Presidency was conferred onto Bush, America had enjoyed one of its biggest financial expansions ever. The surplus at the end of the financial year of 2000 was $237 Billion, just before Bush took office; after his resignation there was a deficit of roughly $1 trillion. This arose from reckless tax cuts and spending on the two wars in the Middle East. Bush‟s government had made little provision for the future and instead tried to give people a short term high via tax cuts and grandiose counter terrorism initiatives. Commodus also seems to have little foresight, as he disregards the Senate‟s advice and silences Gracchus when he speaks of the problems of plague in the Greek quarter. 1 26/04/2011 - Commodus constantly attempts to proffer himself as a man of the people. „I am their father, the people are my children, and I shall hold them to my bosom and embrace them tightly…‟ This line, addressed to Gracchus in the Senate, displays disregard for practicality in favour of an emotional ideal. He also gives the people the aforementioned short term high in the form of gladiatorial games and distribution of free bread. - Like Commodus, George Bush always tried to show himself as an average Southern guy even though he was born in Connecticut, and educated at Harvard and Yale. - Bush‟s colloquial phraseology, such as when he said „The mission is to rout terrorists… to smoke „em out…‟ in order to be more accessible to the public earned him the contempt of his fellow politicians. Commodus suffers the same fate in Gladiator. He is loved by the people and feared by the Senate for it. On a fundamental level, we can argue that Maximus is directly made to represent Christ. • Alternatively, one might argue that Maximus is a hero for a modern age. Indeed, the film‟s poster seems to promote this idea with its slogan, “A Hero Will Rise” Maximus dies for the „sins‟ of Rome, to return it to its Republican origins and away from corruption, just as Christ died to cancel out the sins of humanity and enable a new beginning. • If Ridley Scott‟s ancient Rome is an analogy of contemporary America, then the idea of Maximus as a general is fitting. Scott deploys a militaristic hero for an increasingly militaristic age. The climax, the fight between the despotic Commodus and the hero Maximus, is preceded by clear Christian iconography. The audience sees Maximus chained in a position evocative of the crucifixion. • It is significant that when Maximus is dead, Lucilla proclaims to onlookers, “He was a solider of Rome. Honour him”, emphasising the importance of militaristic prowess in both ancient Rome and contemporary America. • When Maximus has killed Commodus and is himself dead, Lucilla reminds us of the greater significance of Maximus‟ sacrifice: Maximus, a second messiah, can be seen as placed in the context of ancient Rome to illuminate how American society has regressed to a state of corruption and savagery comparable to that of ancient Rome. The sacrifice of Maximus is needed to redeem Rome and give it back to itself. “Is Rome worth one good man‟s life? We believed it once, make us believe it again.” • In this way, the setting of ancient Rome provides a safe distance from which the film can critique contemporary America whilst still maintaining an outwardly entertaining and generally profitable motif. - The film also parallels modern America in the way that it presents Rome as place of opportunity and enlightenment in the eyes of those who have not been there. In reality it does not live up to its image. This is very similar to the presentation of the „American Dream‟ in popular media, such as Arthur Miller‟s play Death of a Salesman. - Near the beginning of the film Maximus and Aurelius discuss why war has been waged, with Maximus saying „… the rest of the world, it is brutal and cruel and dark. Rome is the light.‟ Aurelius retorts „Yet you have never been there. You have not seen what it has become.‟ Maximus‟ naive picture of Rome is deftly smashed once he views it himself. Before his fight with the undefeated champion Tigris he says „Marcus Aurelius had a dream that was Rome. This is not it.‟ - Rome and America are supposed to be enlightened and just superpowers, but they can be seen to be rife with inequality, danger and powerful men scheming for personal gain. 2 26/04/2011 • This idea of origins and their uses appears central to a critical interpretation of Gladiator. We can compare the simplistic life of Maximus with the decadence of Commodus and see the relative heroism and corruption that stem from them as a result. The film heavily contrasts the austere life and dreams of Maximus with those of Commodus. Maximus tells Marcus Aurelius:“My house is in the hills of Trujillo. A very simple place...” • • He uses similar imagery to motivate his troops in the opening battle scene: “Three weeks from now I will be harvesting my crops, imagine where you will be, and it will be so.” • Commodus in comparison is fixated by decadence and ostentation, as symbolised by the Colosseum. As emperor he tries to win the people by ordering 100 days of games, indicating that they too are preoccupied with spectacle. • We might therefore consider the tension between Maximus and Commodus to be representative of a conflict between social ideologies as well as political. • Gladiator, then, presents a critical view of contemporary America through a critique of ancient Rome. We see the short-sighted government of Commodus, who appeases the mob and shuns the Senate, as dangerous and degenerative for society. The film ultimately appears to argue that Maximus‟ function as hero and reluctant martyr is to return Rome to its origins of Republic. So too then, must America look to its origins. As a country it fought for independence from tyranny and the right for liberty and democracy. Ironically, as a superpower its determination to enforce these views might well be its destruction. Gladiator is in some ways a warning to contemporary America through the medium of ancient Rome, to look within itself for inequalities before it attempts to educate others. • • Concluding Remark • Maximus‟ function as hero and reluctant martyr is to return Rome to its origins as a Republic. So too must America look to its origins. Gladiator is in some ways a warning to contemporary America through the medium of ancient Rome to look within itself for inequalities before it attempts to educate others. The film can be seen to gain resonance after 9/11, as it arguably provides a discursive view of America that is sympathetic with that of its most vocal contemporary critics, the Middle East. One of the main points of contempt for Islamic fundamentalists is the spread of Western culture, the founding of an ideological empire on the back of capitalist consumerism. Fundamentalists argue that the enforcing of Western values upon other cultures is a corrupting influence. As Maximus dies to return Rome to its Golden Age, his death also carries contemporary significance, evoking the reprise of a moral and simplistic lifestyle in the face of overwhelming decadence and vacuous consumerism. Winkler, M.M. „Cinema and the Fall of Rome‟, Transactions of the American Philological Association 125 (1995), 135-54 Winkler, M.M. „The Roman Empire in American Cinema after 1945‟, Classical Journal 93 (1998), 167-96. Gladiator, (2000), Directed by Scott, R., Universal and DreamWorks, [DVD]. 3