Contract# 10-PCJPB-P-44A
Work Directive #6851
Table of Contents
Purpose of the Proposed Project ................................................................. 6
Potential Lane Closures and Detours ............................................................ 25
Construction Trip Generation and Distribution ............................................. 27
Traffic Impact Assessment ....................................................................... 27
Mitigation/Project Commitments .............................................................. 33
TOC
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Location ............................................................................................... 3
Figure 2: Deteriorating Conditions of Los Gatos Creek Bridge ....................................... 4
Figure 3: Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement / South Terminal Phase III Project Site
Plan ................................................................................................................................. 8
Figure 4A: Construction Staging Plan – Initial Out-of-Creek Construction ..................... 12
Figure 4B: Construction Staging Plan – Season 1 In-Creek Construction ...................... 13
Figure 4C: Construction Staging Plan – Winter Out-of-Creek Construction ................... 14
Figure 4D: Construction Staging Plan – Season 2 In-Creek Construction Part 1 ........... 15
Figure 4E: Construction Staging Plan – Season 2 In-Creek Construction Part 2 ........... 16
Figure 4F: Construction Staging Plan – Finish Out-of-Creek Construction .................... 17
Figure 5: Traffic Analysis Locations ............................................................................... 21
Figure 6: Traffic Plan ..................................................................................................... 26
List of Tables
Table 1. Construction Stage Work Elements ................................................................ 10
Table 2. Intersection Level of Service Criteria .............................................................. 18
Table 3. Levels of Service at Intersections within the Study Area Based on Traffic
Counts........................................................................................................................... 22
Table 4. Traffic Sensitivity Analysis .............................................................................. 23
Table 5. Existing (2013) Traffic Delay from Trains at Grade Crossing .......................... 24
Table 6. Cumulative Conditions Traffic Delay from Trains at Grade Crossing ............... 29
Table 7. Transportation CEQA Thresholds ................................................................... 30
Appendices
Appendix A: Capacity Analysis Worksheets
Appendix B: ATR Counts
Appendix C: At Grade Crossing Delay Analysis
TOC
1.0 Summary
The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) which operates the San Francisco
Bay Area’s Caltrain passenger rail service proposes to replace the two-track railroad bridge that crosses Los Gatos Creek, in the City of San Jose, Santa Clara County,
California. The Proposed Action is needed to address the structural deficiencies and safety issues of the Caltrain Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge to be consistent with the standards of safety and reliability required for public transit, to ensure that the bridge will continue to safely carry commuter rail service well into the future, and to improve operations at nearby San Jose Diridon Station and along the Caltrain rail line.
The purpose of this report was to evaluate the potential traffic impacts that could result from the proposed project to inform the environmental review processes under California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The report includes a description of the methodology utilized, existing traffic conditions in the project area, and potential impacts to traffic during construction and operation.
The long-term impact on traffic due to the proposed project is limited to an increase in gate down time of three to five seconds at the Auzerais Avenue at-grade crossing due to the provision of a third track through the crossing. The at-grade crossing will continue to operate at LOS C or better even in a 2020 cumulative condition taking into account future development and increases in train service that are independent of the proposed project. The replacement bridge and tail track will improve the reliability of the rail transportation system and will have no effect on other modes.
Project-related construction trip generation (six inbound and six outbound Passenger
Car Equivalents per hour) is negligible in comparison to existing peak hour traffic volumes (for example, 430 eastbound-westbound vehicles on Auzerais Avenue in the
AM Peak hour). Specific truck routes have not been determined at the current level of design, but regardless of which intersections are affected by the construction’s truck routing, the additional temporary traffic load will not substantially change the volume to capacity ratio and the affected intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable
(as defined by San Jose) level of service D or better. Therefore, the impact is less than significant.
Auzerais Avenue will temporarily be closed at the at-grade crossing for two weekends, beginning on a Friday night and ending on Monday morning. The contractor will be required to prepare and implement a traffic management plan, and project special provisions will require that emergency service providers be given adequate advance notice of any street closures and detours during construction phases of the proposed project. Because of the limited duration of the closure and the availability of numerous alternative routes, no significant adverse impact will occur.
2.0 Introduction
The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) which operates the San Francisco
Bay Area’s Caltrain passenger rail service proposes to replace the two-track structurally
1
deficient railroad bridge that crosses Los Gatos Creek, in the City of San Jose, Santa
Clara County, California (see Figure 1).
This report provides an update to the Construction Traffic Impact Technical
Memorandum for the Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement Project prepared by
Parsons in August 2009 to reflect changes in the project design and construction staging. The report describes the proposed project, the street network, existing traffic patterns and conditions; at-grade rail crossings, site access and staging areas, potential lane closures and detours; and potential construction traffic impacts.
As shown in Figure 1, the proposed project area, generally bounded by the San Jose
Diridon Station to the north, Interstate 280 (I-280) to the south, Sunol Street to the west, and Royal Avenue on the east, occupies the width of the right-of-way (ROW) owned by
JPB and extends a distance of approximately 0.4 mile.
Two tracks, Main Tracks 1 and 2 (MT1 and MT2), run parallel through the entire project area. MT1 is owned by the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and MT2 is owned by the
JPB for Caltrain service. Both tracks connect with San Jose Diridon Station Tracks 1 through 9 immediately south of the Park Avenue Overpass. From the Park Avenue
Overpass, the double-track alignment continues southward for approximately 800 feet before passing beneath the West San Carlos Street vehicular bridge. Immediately south of the West San Carlos Street vehicular bridge, the two tracks turn in a southeasterly direction and extend approximately 200 feet across the Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge.
Both tracks continue southeast for approximately 500 feet before crossing Auzerais
Avenue at grade. South of Auzerais Avenue, the double-track alignment continues for approximately 400 feet before reaching the project area's southern boundary immediately north of the I-280 overpass. Beyond I-280, the alignment continues south to Caltrain’s Gilroy Station.
2
Figure 1: Project Location
3
The proposed project is needed to address the structural deficiencies and safety issues of the Caltrain Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge to be consistent with the standards of safety and reliability required for public transit. The project proposes to construct a third track to preserve rail service during the construction period. Following completion of construction, the third track would be retained to improve operations at nearby San Jose
Diridon Station and along the Caltrain rail line. These project needs are discussed below.
2.2.1 Existing Safety Concerns
The existing Los Gatos Creek Bridge measures 174 feet in length and 35 feet in width and is approximately 100 years old. The bridge is made up of two bridge types, steel girders on concrete piers and timber trestle on wooden pile bents (piers). There are a combined nine piers and bents in the creek including the abutments. Second-hand steel girders (now much older than 100 years) were used during the original construction of the bridge and contribute an additional risk for the structural failure of the bridge.
The existing bridge was inspected in 2005 and 2012 as part of the on-going JPB Bridge
Program and many elements were found to not meet current load requirements.
Although the steel spans are in good condition, the southerly timber trestle approach spans have been damaged by fire and have experienced moderate section loss. The bridge was evaluated per current industry requirements for the inspected condition and was found to rate below the current and projected service loads as well as the JPB design criteria for live load capacity (Cooper E80) for new bridges. The bridge was also analyzed for seismic capacity and found to be vulnerable during significant magnitude earthquakes.
Figure 2 shows two photographs from the most recent bridge inspection in 2012. The photographs highlight the deteriorating conditions of the bridge from the charring and rotting of the south bridge cap.
Figure 2: Deteriorating Conditions of Los Gatos Creek Bridge
4
The bridge has reached and exceeded the 75-year useful life for which it was designed.
Due to its increasing age, the compromised condition of the southerly trestle approach spans, failure of some bridge elements to meet current and projected service loads, and vulnerability in the event of a significant earthquake, the Los Gatos Creek Bridge needs to be replaced with a new structure.
2.2.2 Need for Tail Track
Caltrain currently operates 46 northbound and 46 southbound trains per weekday (for a total of 92 trains per day). Forty of these trains originate and terminate at Tamien
Station, located approximately 1.3 miles south of the Los Gatos Creek Bridge. Most
Caltrain service to Tamien Station and further south utilizes only one of the two tracks through the project area, MT2.
The San Jose Diridon Station has recently completed an expansion program that included four new platform faces with extended platform lengths. The expansion allows for more trains to serve the San Jose Diridon Station and more passengers to access the Caltrain trains.
In addition to Caltrain, Altamont Corridor Express (ACE), Capitol Corridor, and Amtrak also serve San Jose Diridon Station. ACE currently operates three weekday trains to
San Jose during the morning peak period and three weekday trains departing San Jose in the evening peak period. Capitol Corridor operates seven weekday trains originating and departing from San Jose Diridon Station (for a total of 14 trains per day). Amtrak
Long Distance currently operates the Coast Starlight which serves San Jose Diridon
Station with two trains per day (one northbound and one southbound). While ACE and
Capitol Corridor trains terminate passenger service at San Jose Station, one Capitol
Corridor train and three ACE trains use Tamien Station and the Tamien yard for layovers. These trains utilize MT1 through the project area from San Jose Station to
Tamien Station. Since MT -1 is owned by UPRR, freight service has priority use for the track.
Currently, the two tracks are sufficient to provide service through this rail corridor.
However, several trains a day pass through the project area just to access the layover area at Tamien Station. There is no siding along this stretch of the Caltrain corridor; therefore non-revenue, non-passenger trains are traveling the full length between
Diridon and Tamien Stations just to turn around. Moreover, other trains that terminate at
San Jose Diridon Station have limited rail yard space to efficiently maneuver and change directions. A tail track extending south from San Jose Diridon Station would improve operations at San Jose Diridon Station and accommodate the trains otherwise laying over and changing direction at Tamien Station.
In addition, if there is a delay in one of the rail services, or if a train breaks down, the lack of any siding along this alignment creates a delay along the entire route. The tail track in the project area would also be able to serve as a temporary, emergency layover area for passenger trains only. Passenger trains that use the tail track will not stop or change directions across Auzerais Avenue.
5
The South Terminal program of improvements includes multiple phases, each of which has independent utility from the other and from the JPB’s plans to electrify the corridor.
Phase I of the South Terminal improvement program was completed in 2012 and involved the addition of two new platforms and four new tracks at San Jose Diridon
Station, as noted above. The JPB has completed operational analyses that indicate the need for track improvements north and south of San Jose Diridon Station. South
Terminal Phase II would add a fourth main track of approximately 2,100 feet in length from Caltrain’s Centralized Equipment Maintenance and Operations Facility (CEMOF)
(MP 46.9) to the north end of San Jose Diridon Station (MP 47.3), just north of West
Santa Clara Street. The Phase II project is integral to ensuring all passenger trains can efficiently maneuver between the tracks at San Jose Diridon Station and the main tracks north of the station, while following the required operating profile, as well as providing capacity for Caltrain non-revenue equipment moves between CEMOF and San Jose
Diridon Station. No timeline for the CEQA evaluation of Phase II is currently available.
The South Terminal Phase III project being evaluated in this IS/MND would improve the reliability of the Diridon-Tamien Station segment, and would allow greater flexibility at
San Jose Diridon Station by enabling out-and-back movements of empty trains switching tracks without competing with revenue trains at CP Alameda (north of the station) or south of the station. These benefits are distinct from the operational benefits provided by the Phase II project. In addition, completion of the Phase III project would not cause or require the Phase II project to be built in the future. The Phase II project need described above is independent of Phase III. The two projects have logical termini and do not impact the same area. Therefore, it is appropriate for South Terminal Phase II and III to be addressed in separate CEQA documents.
2.2.3 Purpose of the Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace the structurally deficient Los Gatos
Creek railroad bridge and provide a tail track south of San Jose Diridon Station in order to:
•
Ensure safe rail travel for Caltrain passengers and other users of the Los Gatos
Creek railroad bridge;
•
Improve operations at the San Jose Diridon Station and provide an efficient way for trains to change directions; and,
•
Minimize system-wide delays by providing a temporary, emergency layover area.
Without the proposed project, the replacement of the Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge would not be completed and the bridge would present an increasing safety hazard to all users. In addition, operations at nearby San Jose Diridon Station would not be improved and system-wide delays would be likely to occur.
The proposed project consists of replacing the existing Los Gatos Creek Bridge while maintaining rail services across the bridge. The new bridge will consist of a two-track alignment over Los Gatos Creek with the addition of a tail track extending south from
San Jose Diridon Station. The addition of the tail track, which comprises Phase III of the
South Terminal Project, is incorporated into the Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement
6
project because the two projects are co-located along the same extent of track. Since the railroad bridge over Los Gatos Creek will be replaced with a new structure, and construction will require a fully functional shoofly track (i.e., temporary track) and bridge in order to maintain operations during construction, building both projects together has been determined by the JPB to be considered more cost-effective and to have less impact to the sensitive environment in the project area.
Figure 3 illustrates the elements of the proposed project. The existing bridge consists of a north abutment, three piers in the creek area, and a series of timber bent segments on the south end; the new bridge would have a north abutment, two piers within the creek area, and a south abutment. The two tracks that currently utilize this bridge are MT1
(owned by UPRR and on the east side of the bridge) and MT2 (owned by the JPB).
7
Figure 3: Los Gatos Creek Bridge Replacement / South Terminal Phase III Project Site Plan
8
The new bridge will be wider than the existing bridge, with the expansion occurring on the west side to accommodate the tail track to improve operations at the San Jose
Diridon Station just to the north of the project area. The tail track and several shoofly tracks will be used to route trains around the area under construction in order to maintain active rail service across the bridge at all times. The ultimate alignments of MT1 and
MT2 over the new bridge will be generally unaltered from their current configuration.
The northern limit of the tail track begins approximately 300 feet north of West San
Carlos Street, and the southern limit of the tail track is located 300 feet south of Auzerais
Avenue, where it ties back into MT2 before the alignment crosses over I-280. Due to spacing requirements between adjacent tracks, minor right-of-way acquisitions from two parcels on the west side of the tracks will be required.
In order to construct the new piers and bridge superstructure, Los Gatos Creek will require temporary realignment via a diversion channel or pipe twice during construction to allow creek flow at all times during construction. During the in-creek work windows, discussed more fully in Sections D and IV, diversion channels will redirect potential flow away from construction areas. During the out-of-creek work windows, when no construction will take place in the water, the creek channel will be returned to its natural state. In addition, rock slope and scour protection materials (riprap) will be installed on the north bank of the creek.
There is an existing storm sewer that runs east/west under the creek and immediately adjacent to the existing bridge’s north abutment. In order to construct the approach slab for MT1, it is necessary to replace the existing storm sewer with a new storm sewer that will be located slightly to the north of the existing sewer line. The new storm sewer will be directionally bored under the creek from dry ground outside of creek footprint, in order to minimize impacts to the creek. Directional boring requires the construction of two temporary pits: a delivery, and a receiving pit, both approximately six feet wide by approximately 10 feet long. Since the exact location of these pits is not known at the current 35 percent level of design, a larger impact area (rectangular extension of project limits just south of West San Carlos Street) is shown in Figure 3 to account for the various possible locations of the pit. The sewer will be advanced using horizontal directional drilling. The fluid will be recycled in the delivery pit and reused. The soils under the creek are clayey and are highly resistant to failure of the drilling fluid (a.k.a. frac out). In the unlikely event that there is a pressure loss in the fluid, construction will halt immediately and the contractor shall initiate mitigation procedures in order to minimize impacts to the creek.
Proposed staging and laydown areas have been identified on the east side of the existing bridge. A portion of the staging area lies on private property and temporary construction easements will be needed for this area.
2.3.1 Construction Staging
Replacement of the Los Gatos Creek railroad bridge is estimated to last approximately
24 months starting in 2015. Work within the creek will be limited to the time between
June 15th and October 15th in order to accommodate sensitive environmental resources. As a result of the environmentally constrained window for work within the creek, the in-creek construction elements will be completed in two consecutive summer
9
seasons. The construction stages and major work elements are outlined in Table 1 and illustrated in Figures 4A through 4F.
Construction trucks entering and leaving the project site will follow different routes depending on the staging area they need to reach and the most direct access to/from the closest freeway (I-280). Figure 4A identifies the proposed construction access pathways.
Table 1. Construction Stage Work Elements
Construction
Stage
1 – Initial out-of-creek construction
Time period for Work
Project Start to June 15
Construction Work Elements
2 - Season 1
in-creek construction
3 - Winter out-of-creek construction
4 - Season 2
in-creek construction
5 - Finish out-of-creek construction
June 16 to
October 14
October 15 to June 15
June 16 to
October 14
October 15 to project completion o
Relocate fence by staging area o
Relocate overhead and underground utilities as required o
Construct north end of tail track up to bridge approach area o
Install shoring and grade temporary access ramp/pathways o
Construct southwest wingwall for abutment 4 o
Temporarily realign channel flow o
Add tie-backs and shoring as needed o
Grade temporary access pathways into creek area o
Construct temporary creek diversion, new sanitary sewer line under the creek, and piers 2 and 3 for new tail track bridge o
Install precast abutments and southwest wingwall caps and remove tie-backs o
Adjust shoring and remove access ramps o
Restore channel flow o
Construct tail track bridge superstructure o
Install tail track over new track bridge o
Install new fiber optic and other electrical associated with new bridge o
Cut in tail track at ends on train-free weekends and begin operations o
Remove tie-backs under MT2 track and add tie-backs and shoring for MT1 o
Grade temporary access pathways into creek area o
Construct temporary creek diversion o
Cut timber deck and remove existing MT2 section of bridge superstructure, piers, and abutments o
Construct piers, abutments, and superstructure for new MT2 bridge o
Construct MT1 shoofly on approaches and across MT2 bridge o
Remove existing MT1 section of bridge superstructure, piers, and abutments o
Construct piers and abutments for new MT1 bridge o
Grade ultimate creek channel, regrade upstream channel embankment, and place riprap as necessary o
Remove access pathways from creek area and regrade downstream channel embankments o
Restore channel flow o
Construct superstructure for new MT1 bridge o
Construct new MT1 track on new bridge o
Remove remaining access pathway segments o
Remove temporary MT1 shoofly and return service to MT1 mainline track
10
Construction
Stage
Time period for Work
Construction Work Elements o
Remove temporary tail track connection and return service to MT2 mainline track
2.3.2 Project Coordination
The Los Gatos Creek Replacement / South Terminal Phase III project is located in the proximity of other improvement projects, including: the City of San Jose’s Los Gatos
Creek Trail Extension; the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Vasona
Light Rail Transit Extension; Santa Clara Valley Water District flood control and water operation plans; California High Speed Rail; and City of San Jose’s West San Carlos
Street overpass replacement. The JPB is coordinating with these project sponsors and will continue its outreach through final design to ensure that project elements are consistent with the goals and objectives of these related projects and do not preclude the design and implementation of these projects. One of the members of the JPB Board is the VTA; therefore, significant coordination is maintained between the agencies.
11
Figure 4A: Construction Staging Plan – Initial Out-of-Creek Construction
12
Figure 4B: Construction Staging Plan – Season 1 In-Creek Construction
13
Figure 4C: Construction Staging Plan – Winter Out-of-Creek Construction
14
Figure 4D: Construction Staging Plan – Season 2 In-Creek Construction Part 1
15
Figure 4E: Construction Staging Plan – Season 2 In-Creek Construction Part 2
16
Figure 4F: Construction Staging Plan – Finish Out-of-Creek Construction
17
3.0 Methodology
This section provides a description of the intersection level of service LOS criteria and the at-grade crossing delay model methodologies.
The primary performance indicator for intersections is level of service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measure that describes operational conditions and provides an index to the quality of traffic flow. LOS is defined in letter designations from A to F. LOS A represents the best operating condition, LOS C describes a stable flow condition, and
LOS F represents the worst operating condition and is generally considered
“unacceptable” to most drivers. Since the LOS of a traffic facility is a function of the traffic flows placed upon it, the LOS of a facility may vary greatly, depending on the time of day, day of week, or period of year. LOS for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time (see Table 2). The average control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay.
Table 2. Intersection Level of Service Criteria
Level of Service
Average Control Delay (seconds/vehicle)
Signalized Intersection
A
B
C
D
E
F
Source: Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2000)
.
≤ 10
>10 to 20
>20 to 35
>35 to 55
>55 to 80
>80
For CEQA purposes, the threshold of significance for impacts to signalized intersections was defined according to the City of San Jose Traffic Impact Analysis Handbook thresholds, which state:
“A significant LOS impact occurs when the project would cause the Levels of
Service at an intersection to fall below LOS D with the addition of project traffic to baseline conditions. For intersections already operating at unacceptable LOS (E or F) under the baseline condition, a significant impact is defined as the proposed project causing:
1
Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 2000
18
1. An increase in average critical delay value by 4.0 seconds or more and an increase in the critical V/C ratio of 0.010 or more, or
2. A decrease in average critical delay and an increase in the critical V/C ratio of 0.010 or more.”
The at-grade crossing delay study used a railroad crossing delay model to estimate the delay experienced by vehicular traffic. The model was developed by Parsons for the
Surface Transportation Board to measure traffic delay and safety consequences of the merger of the Union Pacific and Southern Pacific Railroads.
the model is used in this study.
This model calculates four measures of crossing delay, as follows:
•
Average delay per highway vehicle , in seconds – This is the average delay per vehicle crossing railroad tracks during a 24-hour period. It is used to compute the corresponding LOS based in the 2000 HCM signalized intersection delay criteria shown in Table 2.
•
Total delay per day at crossing , in vehicle hours – This delay includes the time waiting for the traffic queue to dissipate as well as when the crossing is closed by the gate.
•
Maximum average delay per vehicle , in seconds – This statistic measures the average delay per vehicle resulting from the worst crossing blockage of the day caused by a single train.
A degradation of average delay per highway vehicle to the equivalent of LOS D or lower was identified as the threshold for significant impacts to at-grade crossings under CEQA
(consistent with the LOS D threshold for signalized intersections discussed in Section
3.1).
4.0 Existing Conditions
This section provides a description of the street network in the project area, and the results of existing conditions traffic and at-grade crossing analyses.
Regional access is provided by Interstate 280 (I-280), California State Route 87
(Guadalupe Parkway), and Interstate 880 (I-880). Local access to the site is provided by
Bird Avenue/South Montgomery Street, West San Carlos Street, Sunol Street, and
Auzerais Avenue.
2
Parsons, 2009, Draft Traffic Impact Report for the Dumbarton Rail Corridor Project.
19
Interstate 280 (I-280)
I-280 is generally an east-west eight-lane freeway in the vicinity of the project site.
Access to the project site to and from I-280 is provided via full interchange at Bird
Avenue.
California State Route 87
California State Route 87 is a four-lane freeway that is aligned in a north-south orientation. Access to the project site is provided via partial interchanges at Park
Avenue, Auzerais Avenue, and Woz Way.
Interstate 880 (I-880)
I-880 is a north-south six-lane freeway in the vicinity of the project site. I-880 provides access to the project site via a full interchange at I-280.
Local access to the site is provided various roadways:
Auzerais Avenue is an east-west two-lane arterial providing direct access to southbound SR 87 and to the project site. Auzerais Avenue provides east-west access through the at-grade crossing between Bird Avenue and Sunol Street. In the vicinity of the site, Auzerais Avenue provides sidewalks and parking on both sides of the street.
Bird Avenue is a four to six lane north-south arterial with access to I-280. Bird Avenue accesses the project site through a signalized intersection with Auzerais Avenue and provides access to the east side of the at-grade rail crossing on Auzerais Avenue. After the intersection of Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street, Bird Avenue continues to become South Montgomery Street.
Sunol Street is a north-south two-lane street with access to the west side of the at grade rail crossing through a signalized intersection with Auzerais Avenue.
West San Carlos Street is an east-west four-lane street. It is grade separated were it passes over the railroad tracks.
Dupont Street is an east-west two-lane dead-end street that extends from West San
Carlos Street to Los Gatos Creek Trail and the railroad tracks.
The intersection capacity analyses for eight signalized intersections that may be potentially affected by construction traffic were provided by the City of San Jose.
eight intersections are listed below and shown in Figure 5:
•
I-280 and Bird Avenue (N) (signalized)
•
I-280 and Bird Avenue (S) (signalized)
•
Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street (signalized)
•
Bird Avenue and Auzerais Avenue (signalized)
•
South Montgomery Street and Park Avenue (signalized)
•
Park Avenue and Sunol Street (signalized)
•
West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street (signalized)
3
May 13, 2013 Email from Paul Ma, City of San Jose to Wendy Aviles, The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
20
•
Sunol Street and Auzerais Avenue (signalized)
Figure 5: Traffic Analysis Locations
Table 3 summarizes the intersection analysis summary of the key intersections based on the latest turning movement counts available. The dates when traffic data was collected range from 2008 to 2012, depending on the intersection. Detailed capacity analysis worksheets from City of San Jose’s Traffix Database are attached in Appendix A.
Acceptable intersection operations in the City of San Jose are defined as LOS D or better.
The intersections selected for analysis operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and the PM peak hours based on the latest counts available from the City of San Jose.
4
San Jose Traffic Impact Analysis Handbook – Policies & Guidelines, Volume II, 2011
21
Table 3. Levels of Service at Intersections within the Study Area Based on Traffic
Counts
Intersection
I-280 and Bird Avenue (N)
Traffic
Count
Year
2012
LOS
C
AM Peak Hour
Average Delay
(sec)
32.0 C
PM Peak Hour
LOS
Average
Delay
(sec)
27.4
I-280 and Bird Avenue (S) 2012 C 28.6 C 25.0
Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street
Bird Avenue and Auzerais Avenue
2012
2009
C-
C+
34.1
22.0
D
C
39.0
25.8
S. Montgomery Street and Park Avenue
West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street
2009
2012
2008
C
B
A
29.5
16.1
7.4
C
B-
B+
28.1
18.5
10.4 Park Avenue and Sunol Street
Sunol Street and Auzerais Avenue 2009 A 7.9 A 7.5
Source: Traffix Database, City of San Jose.
Notes:
LOS = Level of Service. LOS calculations conducted using Traffix level of service analysis software using the HCM methodologies.
Delay is measured in seconds per vehicle.
A sensitivity analysis was prepared to ensure that the intersection LOS calculated from traffic counts conducted in 2008 (Park Avenue and Sunol Street) and 2009 (Bird Avenue and Auzerais Avenue, S. Montgomery Street and Park Avenue, and Sunol Street and
Auzerais Avenue) remained a reasonable baseline for assessing potential temporary impacts of the project. The sensitivity analysis involved identifying annual average traffic volume growth rates between 2008 and 2012 for intersections with count data available for both years. These growth rates were then applied to the intersections with only 2008 or 2009 counts available to estimate 2012 traffic volumes. The 2012 estimated traffic volumes were then used to estimate any potential changes in LOS due to growth since
2008-2009.
Two intersections in the study area had data available for 2008 and 2012: Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street, and West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street. Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street was selected as being representative of two intersections on the east side of the study area: Bird Avenue and Auzerais Avenue, and South
Montgomery Street and Park Street.
The West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street intersection was selected as being representative of two intersections on the west side of the study area (this intersection has higher growth rate than the Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street intersection, possibly due to proximity to the Monte Vista Townhome development): Park Avenue and
Sunol Street, and Sunol Street and Auzerais Ave.
Table 4 summarizes the results of the traffic sensitivity analysis. Based on the estimated
2012 traffic volumes, it was concluded that Bird Avenue and Auzerais Avenue, and
South Montgomery Street and Park Avenue will remain at LOS C in the AM and PM
22
peak periods in 2012. The 2009 average delay at these intersections was under 30 seconds per vehicle; the increased volumes in 2012 will not be enough to increase average delay to over 35 seconds (LOS D threshold).
Park Avenue and Sunol Street, and Sunol Street and Auzerais Ave will likely drop from LOS A in 2008/2009 to LOS B in the AM peak hour in 2012 due to estimated traffic volume growth. Both intersections will also likely be at LOS B in the PM peak hour in 2012.
In conclusion, consideration of traffic growth between 2008/2009 and 2012 showed that all intersections in the study area will operate at LOS C or better, with the exception of the Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street intersection that operates at LOS D in the
PM peak period.
Table 4. Traffic Sensitivity Analysis
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Traffic Count
Years
Available
Previous
Traffic
Volume
(2008 or
2009
2012
Traffic
Volume
3
Annual
Average
Growth
Rate
Previous
Traffic
Volume
(2008 or
2009
2012
Traffic
Volume
3
Annual
Average
Growth
Rate
Bird Avenue and
West San Carlos
Street
Bird Avenue and
Auzerais Avenue
1
South Montgomery
Street and Park
Avenue
1
West San Carlos
Street and Sunol
Street
Park Avenue and
Sunol Street
2
Sunol Street and
Auzerais Avenue
2
2012 and
2008
2009
2009
2012 and
2008
2008
2009
2,457
2,608
1,710
838
835
313
2,723
2,817
1,847
2.60%
2.60%
2.60%
3,213
2,728
1,888
1,479 15.26% 1,332
1,474 15.26%
479 15.26%
882
415
3,335
2,805
1,942
1,703
1,128
499
Notes:
1. Intersections represented by Bird Avenue and West San Carlos Street growth.
2. Intersections represented by West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street growth.
3. 2012 traffic volumes in italics were estimated using growth rates developed from nearby intersections with counts available for 2008 and 2012.
0.94%
0.94%
0.94%
6.34%
6.34%
6.34%
Traffic delay at the Auzerais Avenue crossing was calculated based on average daily traffic (ADT) on Auzerais Avenue and estimates of the number of passing trains, lengths, and speeds. Mechanical ATR counts were conducted in both directions for 48 hours in
15-minute intervals on Auzerais Avenue adjacent to the existing at-grade rail crossing
(see Figure 5). These counts were conducted on Tuesday and Wednesday of the third week of February 2013. The 2013 ADT volumes on Auzerais Avenue are 2,962
23
(eastbound) and 2,886 (westbound) vehicles per day. Detailed information regarding the
ATR counts is shown in Appendix B.
Existing traffic delay was calculated based on 2013 ADT volumes, estimates of current daily number of trains, lengths, and speeds. The maximum average delay per delayed vehicle, total delay per day, and average delay per vehicle at the analyzed railroad crossing location is presented in Table 5.
While there is no commonly accepted method for rating the severity of at-grade crossing delay, Table 5 shows LOS results based on the same criteria used to determine intersection delay. This includes average daily delay per vehicle as a measure by which to indicate the amount of circulation disruption attributable to the rail crossing throughout the day as compared to typical peak-hour intersection conditions. Detailed information regarding the existing 2013 at-grade crossing delay at Auzerais Avenue is shown in
Appendix C.
The rail crossing at Auzerais Avenue has a low average delay per vehicle, resulting in a
LOS A.
Table 5. Existing (2013) Traffic Delay from Trains at Grade Crossing
Crossing Street
Average
Daily
Traffic
Average
Delay per
Vehicle (sec)
Corresponding
HCM
Intersection LOS
Total Delay per Day
(veh-hours)
Max Average
Delay per
Delayed
Vehicle (sec)
Auzerais Avenue 5,848 2.18 A 3.54 101.59
Source: The Louis Berger Group, Inc., 2013.
Note:
Maximum average delay per delayed vehicle measures the average delay per vehicle in the worst crossing blockage of the day by a single train.
5.0 Construction Conditions
This section provides a discussion of the construction site access and staging areas, truck routes, potential lane closures and detours, and construction trip generation and distribution.
Most construction activities will be limited to 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on weekdays per San
Jose construction noise ordinance. The exception is a small amount of trackwork that must be conducted at night to not interfere with rail operations. Access, staging and laydown areas are shown on Figure 3. The potential staging and laydown areas are proposed on a paved lot behind of the Orchard Supply Hardware (OSH) store and east of the rail tracks and the existing railroad bridge. Primary access to the staging and laydown areas are provided from Auzerais Avenue. Access pathways are also located on the west side of the bridge, as shown in Figure 4A, but there would not be a staging area on the west siede.
24
Specific truck routes will be determined in the project’s final design. Once these specific truck routes are determined, JPB will reach out to those residences and businesses affected by construction traffic to maintain safe access to the neighboring properties. For impact analysis purposes, it is assumed that any of the intersections in the project area could experience construction truck traffic.
As part of the addition of the tail track, the at-grade crossing at Auzerais Avenue will require some improvements (such as relocating the existing crossing gates). This activity will require a temporary partial closure of Auzerais Avenue, and therefore traffic detours. The partial closure of Auzerais Avenue will occur only during two separate weekends, starting on a Friday night and ending early during a Monday morning. The
Traffic Plan is shown in Figure 6.
During the Auzerais Avenue partial closure, limited access to Auzerais Avenue will be maintained, however the road will be closed to through traffic (traffic crossing east-west on Auzerais Avenue). Although the east side of Auzerais Avenue (east of the at-grade crossing) will remain accessible directly from Bird Avenue, Royal Avenue, and Drake
Street, the west side of Auzerais Avenue (west of the at-grade crossing) will be accessed from the east side using Bird Avenue, Royal Avenue, West San Carlos Street and Sunol Street. Construction signs will be used to ensure safety during construction activities.
Pedestrians will also be affected by construction activities. Local residents crossing east-west on Auzerais Avenue will be directed to take Royal Avenue, West San Carlos
Street, Dupont Street and Los Gatos Creek Trail.
25
Figure 6: Traffic Plan
26
The construction activities are estimated to last approximately 24 months starting in
2015. It is projected that the majority of construction work will occur during weekdays from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. During the construction activities, additional traffic will be generated due to commuting construction workers and the construction trucks, specially the haul trucks and concrete trucks.
Based on the previous traffic impact study prepared for the project by Parsons in 2009, there will be an average of 8 workers on site per workday during the peak months of construction. During the peak construction period, construction workers will generate 10 daily trips (assuming one-third of the workforce will carpool to the site), 7 of which will occur during the AM and PM peak hours (assuming 70% of workforce commutes during peak traffic hours). These assumptions are conservative—given the start time of construction at 7:00 AM; many workers will need to arrive on the site before 7:00 AM and thus will not commute during the AM peak hour (approximately 8:00 AM- 9:00 AM based on the Auzerais Avenue ATR counts). Similarly, with a construction end time of
7:00 PM, not all workers will commute home in the PM peak hour.
If a peak employee load of 12 workers occur, approximately 6 inbound and 6 outbound construction trucks (haul trucks and concrete trucks) trips will occur over a typical eighthour work day. This is an average of 2 truck trips inbound and 2 truck trips outbound per hour
. To be conservative, it is assumed that the same number of construction trucks per
hour will occur during a 12-hour work day. Considering that the trucks will follow a random arrival-departure distribution, it is projected that as many as 3 trucks trips inbound and 3 truck trips outbound may occur during the AM and PM peak hours. Using a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) factor of 2.0 for trucks, a total of 6 inbound and 6 outbound PCE’s per hour are estimated.
6.0 Traffic Impact Assessment
This section analyzes the construction related traffic impacts and summarizes the traffic impact analysis conclusions in terms of the CEQA significance thresholds.
There will be no long-term impacts related to traffic congestion (no additional trips will be generated by the project and no changes to the operation of existing intersections/roadways will occur).
Project-related construction trip generation (six inbound and six outbound Passenger
Car Equivalents per hour) is negligible in comparison to existing peak hour traffic volumes (for example, 430 eastbound-westbound vehicles on Auzerais Avenue in the
AM Peak hour). Regardless of which intersections are affected by the construction’s truck routing the additional temporary traffic load will not substantially change the volume to capacity ratio and the affected intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable
5
Parsons, 2009, Construction Traffic Impact Technical Memorandum for the Los Gatos Creek Bridge
Replacement Project
27
(as defined by San Jose
) level of service D or better. The impact will be less than significant.
The temporary Auzerais Avenue closure on two weekends will not exceed San Jose traffic impact standards because it will occur during the weekend, detour routes will be provided, and the work will be scheduled to avoid major events at the SAP Center.
At the Auzerias Avenue at-grade crossing the JPB estimates the length of gate down time will increase by approximately three to five seconds due to the increased length of the crossing with the addition of the tail track. The proposed project does not include any increase in the number of trains utilizing the crossing. Given the existing LOS A at this crossing, the increase in delay due to three to five seconds longer of gate down time will not cause an exceedence of the City of San Jose’s LOS standard.
To address public comments on the draft IS/MND, a cumulative impact analysis of the at-grade crossing was conducted. Per San Jose policy, a project is deemed to contribute to a cumulative traffic impact if the addition of traffic from pending projects (or application of a growth factor) plus project-generated traffic/delay results in a significant impact based on the same criteria as for project-level impacts (in this case the LOS D standard).
As part of the cumulative impact analysis, the at-grade crossing delay at Auzerais
Avenue was evaluated for three additional scenarios:
•
Background Conditions refer to background traffic volumes estimated by adding to the existing ADT volumes the projected ADT volumes from approved, but not yet completed developments in the project area.
•
Cumulative Conditions without Project were represented by adding to the existing traffic volumes the additional vehicle traffic and train service generated by all other potential projects in the study area that have been proposed, but have not yet been approved.
•
Cumulative Conditions with Project refer to Cumulative Conditions including the addition of 4 seconds longer gate down time due to the wider at-grade crossing at Auzerais Avenue.
The existing conditions traffic volumes already include the effect of the Monte Vista
Townhome development. To account for other development projects in the vicinity, the future ADT volumes were estimated from the projected Background and Cumulative
Conditions peak hour volume increments on Auzerais Avenue from the Ohlone Mixed-
Used DEIR prepared for the City of San Jose on 2009. The future train service increment on Auzerais Avenue was estimated using information from Caltrain operational analyses of the South Terminal Area. Detailed information regarding the future scenarios is shown in Appendix C.
Table 6 shows the LOS results for the Background, 2020 Cumulative without Project, and 2020 Cumulative with Project scenarios. Even with future development and increases in train service (such as Caltrain electrification), the at-grade crossing would be at LOS C. No significant cumulative impacts would occur, therefore it is not
6
San Jose Traffic Impact Analysis Handbook – Policies & Guidelines, Volume II, 2011
28
necessary to determine if the contribution of the project is cumulatively considerable and no further analysis is warranted.
Table 6. Cumulative Conditions Traffic Delay from Trains at Grade Crossing
Scenario
Average
Daily
Traffic
Average Delay per Vehicle
(sec)
Corresponding
HCM
Intersection
LOS
Total
Delay per
Day
(vehhours)
Max Average
Delay per
Delayed
Vehicle (sec)
Background
2020 Cumulative w/o Project
2020 Cumulative with Project
11,992
12,725
12,725
7.18
31.22
34.02
A
C
C
23.92
110.37
120.24
101.59
101.59
103.59
Source: The Louis Berger Group, Inc., 2013.
Note:
Maximum average delay per delayed vehicle measures the average delay per vehicle in the worst crossing blockage of the day by a single train.
Table 7 summarizes the impacts of the proposed project in relation to the CEQA thresholds for significant adverse transportation impacts. The proposed project will not result in significant adverse transportation impacts based on the CEQA thresholds.
29
CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Transportation
Thresholds a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Table 7. Transportation CEQA Thresholds
Long-Term Operation Impact
Less than Significant Impact. Gate down time will increase 3 to 5 seconds at the
Auzerias Avenue at-grade crossing, but will not result in an exceedence of the City of
San Jose’s intersection level of service standard. The replacement bridge and tail track will improve the reliability of the rail transportation system and will have no impact on other modes.
Temporary Construction Impact
Less than Significant Impact. Project-related construction trip generation (six inbound and six outbound
Passenger Car Equivalents per hour) is negligible in comparison to existing peak hour traffic volumes (for example, 430 eastbound-westbound vehicles on Auzerais
Avenue in the AM Peak hour). The additional traffic load will not substantially change volume to capacity and the affected intersections operate at an acceptable (as defined by San Jose) level of service D or better.
The temporary Auzerais Avenue closure on two weekends will not exceed San Jose traffic impact standards because it will occur during the weekend, detour routes will be provided, and the work will be scheduled to avoid major events at the SAP Center.
Through the use of temporary bypass tracks, Caltrain and
UPRR service will continue uninterrupted during construction of the new bridge and tail track. Therefore, there will be no impact on these services.
The Los Gatos Creek Trail will remain open throughout construction. Sidewalks at Auzerais Avenue at-grade crossing will be closed two weekends, but detour route signage will be provided. Therefore, impacts to bicycle and pedestrian movements will be less than significant.
30
CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Transportation
Thresholds b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Long-Term Operation Impact
Less than Significant Impact. The impact to the Auzerias Avenue at-grade crossing gate down time will not exceed City of San
Jose LOS standards.
No Impact. The proposed project is not located near an airport and does not involve aircraft use.
No Impact. The proposed project will not create hazardous design features. The
Auzerais Avenue at-grade crossing will be reconstructed and will meet Caltrain safety standards (crossing gates, warning bells etc.). Prior to advertising the project, the
JPB will submit an application to the
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC) requesting authority to make minor modifications to the existing crossing at
Auzerais Avenue, in accordance with the
General Order 88B (Modify an Existing Rail
Crossing) process of the CPUC.
The project involves modifications to portions of an existing rail corridor and does not introduce incompatible uses.
Temporary Construction Impact
Less than Significant Impact. All the intersections in the study area operated at acceptable LOS under existing conditions according to the San Jose Traffic Impact
Analysis Handbook (LOS D or better). The number of construction trips attributable to the proposed project will not change LOS at intersections operating at LOS C or better.
No Impact. The proposed project is not located near an airport and does not involve aircraft use.
No impact. The construction plan will not introduce hazards such as sharp curves or dangerous intersections.
Construction will not introduce incompatible land uses.
31
CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Transportation
Thresholds e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Long-Term Operation Impact
No Impact. There will be no long-term effect on emergency access (access will remain the same as existing conditions). f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
No Impact. The proposed project will have no conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation.
By reducing conflict with freight trains, the provision of the tail track is consistent with local and regional plans supportive of transit system reliability.
Temporary Construction Impact
Less than Significant Impact. Auzerais Avenue will temporarily be closed at the at-grade crossing for two weekends, beginning on a Friday night and ending on
Monday morning. The contractor will be required to prepare and implement a traffic management plan, and project special provisions will require that emergency service providers be given adequate advance notice of any street closures and detours during construction phases of the proposed project. Because of the limited duration of the closure and the availability of numerous alternative routes, no significant adverse impact will occur.
No Impact. The Los Gatos Creek Trail, a regional pedestrian/bicycle route, will remain open during construction. The construction site will be fenced from public access, thus no safety issues will occur.
7
For example, the San Jose 2040 General Plan includes a policy to “Increase substantially the proportion of commute travel using modes other than the singleoccupant vehicle” (TR-1.3). San Jose’s mode shift target is to increase the percentage of commute trips to and from San Jose by transit to at least 20% by 2040 (from
4.1% in 2008).
8
Plan Bay Area includes a Transit Performance Initiative, which provides incentives to reward agencies that achieve improvements in ridership and service productivity. Plan Bay Area Target #10c is to “Reduce the share of transit assets past their useful life to 0 percent”. The proposed project would be supportive of both reliability and state of good repair-related goals.
32
7.0 Mitigation/Project Commitments
Although no significant adverse impacts requiring mitigation were identified, the project incorporates several transportation commitments as summarized below.
•
JPB will coordinate with local emergency service providers, including providing advance notice of the Auzerais Avenue closure and detour routes during construction activities and avoiding lane closures during and before special events at the SAP Center (about 0.5 mile to the north).
•
JPB will require construction contractors to provide construction worker parking within the fence line of the various construction sites and staging areas.
•
Prior to advertising the project, the JPB will submit an application to the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requesting authority to make minor modifications to the existing crossing at Auzerais Avenue, in accordance with the
General Order 88B (Modify an Existing Rail Crossing) process of the CPUC.
33
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:41 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing (AM)
Command: Existing
Volume: Existing (AM)
Geometry: Existing (AM)
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: No Project
Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution
Paths: Default Path
Routes: Default Route
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
#3032 280/BIRD (N) C 32.0 0.718 C 32.0 0.718 + 0.000 D/V
#3033 280/BIRD (S) C 28.6 0.567 C 28.6 0.567 + 0.000 D/V
#3077 BIRD/SAN CARLOS C- 34.1 0.511 C- 34.1 0.511 + 0.000 D/V
#3266 AUZERAIS/BIRD C+ 22.0 0.350 C+ 22.0 0.350 + 0.000 D/V
#3709 MONTGOMERY/PARK C 29.5 0.274 C 29.5 0.274 + 0.000 D/V
#3730 PARK/SUNOL A 7.4 0.264 A 7.4 0.264 + 0.000 D/V
#3906 SAN CARLOS/SUNOL B 16.1 0.324 B 16.1 0.324 + 0.000 D/V
#3969 AUZERAIS/SUNOL A 7.9 0.122 A 7.9 0.122 + 0.000 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3032 280/BIRD (N)
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.718
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.0
Optimal Cycle: 55 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Oct 2012 << 7:15-8:15AM
Base Vol: 266 1062 0 0 596 163 0 0 0 197 264 736
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 266 1062 0 0 596 163 0 0 0 197 264 736
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 266 1062 0 0 596 163 0 0 0 197 264 736
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 266 1062 0 0 596 163 0 0 0 197 264 736
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 266 1062 0 0 596 163 0 0 0 197 264 736
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.36 1.50
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 0 0 0 1992 648 2703
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.41 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.4 42.9 0.0 0.0 17.5 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.1 68.1 68.1
Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.72 0.48
Delay/Veh: 50.6 30.7 0.0 0.0 51.9 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 20.5 15.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.6 30.7 0.0 0.0 51.9 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.5 20.5 15.6
LOS by Move: D C A A D- D- A A A B C+ B
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 10 0 0 8 7 0 0 0 3 21 11
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3033 280/BIRD (S)
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.567
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.6
Optimal Cycle: 39 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 0 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Oct 2012 << 7:30-8:30AM
Base Vol: 0 1077 367 384 456 0 328 9 137 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1077 367 384 456 0 328 9 137 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1077 367 384 456 0 328 9 137 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1077 367 384 456 0 328 9 137 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1077 367 384 456 0 328 9 137 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 3455 95 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.21 0.22 0.08 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 44.4 44.4 46.5 90.9 0.0 20.1 20.1 20.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.57 0.57 0.11 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 29.6 31.3 30.0 3.8 0.0 47.2 47.2 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 29.6 31.3 30.0 3.8 0.0 47.2 47.2 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 12 11 1 0 7 7 5 0 0 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3077 BIRD/SAN CARLOS
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.511
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 34.1
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: C-
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2012 << 8:00-9:00AM
Base Vol: 442 803 143 52 247 61 100 310 90 75 362 38
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 442 803 143 52 247 61 100 310 90 75 362 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 442 803 143 52 247 61 100 310 90 75 362 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 442 803 143 52 247 61 100 310 90 75 362 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 442 803 143 52 247 61 100 310 90 75 362 38
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.53 0.47 1.00 2.38 0.62 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4752 846 1750 4489 1109 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.10 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.3 53.7 53.7 18.5 12.9 12.9 13.4 21.0 21.0 14.7 22.4 22.4
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.38 0.38 0.19 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.47 0.29 0.35 0.51 0.12
Delay/Veh: 21.1 22.1 22.1 44.6 51.3 51.3 52.5 44.9 43.5 49.2 44.5 40.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 21.1 22.1 22.1 44.6 51.3 51.3 52.5 44.9 43.5 49.2 44.5 40.8
LOS by Move: C+ C+ C+ D D- D- D- D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 8 8 2 4 4 4 5 3 3 6 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3266 AUZERAIS/BIRD
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.350
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.0
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: C+
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 29 Oct 2009 << 7:30-8:30AM
Base Vol: 236 1238 122 30 587 44 17 50 157 80 39 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1238 122 30 587 44 17 50 157 80 39 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 236 1238 122 30 587 44 17 50 157 80 39 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 236 1238 122 30 587 44 17 50 157 80 39 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 236 1238 122 30 587 44 17 50 157 80 39 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.63 0.31 0.06
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 457 1343 1750 1102 537 110
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.07 0.02 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 45.7 73.6 73.6 7.0 34.9 34.9 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 30.4
Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.35 0.11 0.29 0.35 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.29 0.29 0.29
Delay/Veh: 26.9 11.5 9.7 55.7 33.8 31.0 34.9 34.9 37.2 36.4 36.4 36.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 26.9 11.5 9.7 55.7 33.8 31.0 34.9 34.9 37.2 36.4 36.4 36.4
LOS by Move: C B+ A E+ C- C C- C- D+ D+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 7 2 1 5 1 2 2 5 4 4 4
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3709 MONTGOMERY/PARK
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.274
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.5
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 27 Oct 2009 << 7:45-8:45AM
Base Vol: 193 582 184 17 229 27 27 117 181 37 91 25
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 193 582 184 17 229 27 27 117 181 37 91 25
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 193 582 184 17 229 27 27 117 181 37 91 25
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 193 582 184 17 229 27 27 117 181 37 91 25
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 193 582 184 17 229 27 27 117 181 37 91 25
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 48.2 42.3 42.3 23.5 17.6 17.6 45.2 45.2 45.2 45.2 45.2 45.2
Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.29 0.30 0.05 0.27 0.11 0.04 0.08 0.27 0.06 0.06 0.04
Delay/Veh: 24.3 28.1 28.4 39.3 45.7 44.6 23.7 24.1 26.2 23.8 23.9 23.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 24.3 28.1 28.4 39.3 45.7 44.6 23.7 24.1 26.2 23.8 23.9 23.7
LOS by Move: C C C D D D C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 5 1 3 1 1 1 5 1 1 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3730 PARK/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 57 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.264
Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.4
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 29 Apr 2008 << AM
Base Vol: 14 44 9 48 42 19 30 283 8 9 286 43
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 44 9 48 42 19 30 283 8 9 286 43
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 44 9 48 42 19 30 283 8 9 286 43
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 44 9 48 42 19 30 283 8 9 286 43
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 44 9 48 42 19 30 283 8 9 286 43
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92
Lanes: 0.24 0.76 1.00 0.44 0.39 0.17 0.10 0.90 1.00 0.03 0.97 1.00
Final Sat.: 434 1366 1750 771 674 305 173 1627 1750 55 1745 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.02
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.04
Delay/Veh: 17.9 17.9 16.8 19.3 19.3 19.3 4.6 4.6 3.3 4.5 4.5 3.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 17.9 17.9 16.8 19.3 19.3 19.3 4.6 4.6 3.3 4.5 4.5 3.5
LOS by Move: B B B B- B- B- A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 2 2 2 3 3 0 2 2 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3906 SAN CARLOS/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.324
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.1
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 4 Oct 2012 << 8:00-9:00AM
Base Vol: 10 44 17 34 11 26 53 598 6 10 636 34
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 44 17 34 11 26 53 598 6 10 636 34
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 44 17 34 11 26 53 598 6 10 636 34
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 44 17 34 11 26 53 598 6 10 636 34
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 44 17 34 11 26 53 598 6 10 636 34
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.14 0.62 0.24 0.48 0.15 0.37 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 246 1085 419 838 271 641 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.17 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 21.4 21.4 14.6 29.0 29.0
Volume/Cap: 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.28 0.48 0.01 0.03 0.38 0.04
Delay/Veh: 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 27.5 17.7 14.7 19.7 12.1 10.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 24.8 27.5 17.7 14.7 19.7 12.1 10.2
LOS by Move: C C C C C C C B B B- B B+
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 0 4 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (AM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:44 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3969 AUZERAIS/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 64 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.122
Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 19 Feb 2009 << 7:30-8:30AM
Base Vol: 9 9 21 13 22 7 5 69 6 33 98 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 9 21 13 22 7 5 69 6 33 98 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 9 21 13 22 7 5 69 6 33 98 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 9 21 13 22 7 5 69 6 33 98 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 9 9 21 13 22 7 5 69 6 33 98 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 0.23 0.23 0.54 0.31 0.52 0.17 0.06 0.86 0.08 0.22 0.64 0.14
Final Sat.: 404 404 942 542 917 292 109 1509 131 380 1128 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4
Volume/Cap: 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.12
Delay/Veh: 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.9 21.9 21.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.9 21.9 21.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1
LOS by Move: C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ C+ A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:46 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario Report
Scenario: Existing (PM)
Command: Existing
Volume: Existing (PM)
Geometry: Existing (PM)
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: No Project
Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution
Paths: Default Path
Routes: Default Route
Configuration: Existing
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
#3032 280/BIRD (N) C 27.4 0.755 C 27.4 0.755 + 0.000 D/V
#3033 280/BIRD (S) C 25.0 0.704 C 25.0 0.704 + 0.000 D/V
#3077 BIRD/SAN CARLOS D 39.0 0.655 D 39.0 0.655 + 0.000 D/V
#3266 AUZERAIS/BIRD C 25.8 0.496 C 25.8 0.496 + 0.000 D/V
#3709 MONTGOMERY/PARK C 28.1 0.350 C 28.1 0.350 + 0.000 D/V
#3730 PARK/SUNOL B+ 10.4 0.301 B+ 10.4 0.301 + 0.000 D/V
#3906 SAN CARLOS/SUNOL B- 18.5 0.421 B- 18.5 0.421 + 0.000 D/V
#3969 AUZERAIS/SUNOL A 7.5 0.147 A 7.5 0.147 + 0.000 D/V
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3032 280/BIRD (N)
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.755
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.4
Optimal Cycle: 62 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Sep 2012 << 5:00-6:00PM
Base Vol: 144 456 0 0 1448 592 0 0 0 468 4 496
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 144 456 0 0 1448 592 0 0 0 468 4 496
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 144 456 0 0 1448 592 0 0 0 468 4 496
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 144 456 0 0 1448 592 0 0 0 468 4 496
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 144 456 0 0 1448 592 0 0 0 468 4 496
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.48 0.01 1.51
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 0 0 0 2593 14 2643
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.1 66.9 0.0 0.0 53.8 53.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.1 44.1 44.1
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.75 0.51
Delay/Veh: 67.6 12.8 0.0 0.0 24.8 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 35.8 29.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.6 12.8 0.0 0.0 24.8 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 35.8 29.7
LOS by Move: E B A A C C A A A C D+ C
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 3 0 0 13 21 0 0 0 10 18 10
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3033 280/BIRD (S)
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.704
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.0
Optimal Cycle: 53 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 0 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Sep 2012 << 5:00-6:00PM
Base Vol: 0 372 220 628 1284 0 204 16 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 372 220 628 1284 0 204 16 292 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 372 220 628 1284 0 204 16 292 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 372 220 628 1284 0 204 16 292 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 372 220 628 1284 0 204 16 292 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.86 0.14 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 3292 258 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.36 0.23 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 21.4 21.4 61.1 82.6 0.0 28.4 28.4 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.37 0.70 0.70 0.33 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 43.5 53.4 25.1 7.6 0.0 37.4 37.4 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 43.5 53.4 25.1 7.6 0.0 37.4 37.4 47.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D- C A A D+ D+ D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 4 10 19 6 0 4 4 12 0 0 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3077 BIRD/SAN CARLOS
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.655
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.0
Optimal Cycle: 56 Level Of Service: D
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 18 Sep 2012 << 5:00-6:00PM
Base Vol: 149 314 118 88 1061 114 82 536 298 218 321 36
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 149 314 118 88 1061 114 82 536 298 218 321 36
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 149 314 118 88 1061 114 82 536 298 218 321 36
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 149 314 118 88 1061 114 82 536 298 218 321 36
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 149 314 118 88 1061 114 82 536 298 218 321 36
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.15 0.85 1.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4068 1529 1750 5056 543 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.05 0.14 0.17 0.12 0.08 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.6 31.8 31.8 22.2 38.4 38.4 22.1 31.2 31.2 22.8 31.9 31.9
Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.66 0.66 0.25 0.54 0.66 0.66 0.32 0.08
Delay/Veh: 56.4 35.3 35.3 42.4 36.0 36.0 42.4 38.9 43.1 49.6 35.5 33.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.4 35.3 35.3 42.4 36.0 36.0 42.4 38.9 43.1 49.6 35.5 33.1
LOS by Move: E+ D+ D+ D D+ D+ D D+ D D D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 4 4 3 12 12 3 8 10 9 5 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3266 AUZERAIS/BIRD
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.496
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 25.8
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 29 Oct 2009 << 5:00-6:00PM
Base Vol: 127 500 77 54 1408 20 19 84 244 120 50 25
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 500 77 54 1408 20 19 84 244 120 50 25
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 127 500 77 54 1408 20 19 84 244 120 50 25
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 127 500 77 54 1408 20 19 84 244 120 50 25
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 127 500 77 54 1408 20 19 84 244 120 50 25
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.18 0.82 1.00 0.61 0.26 0.13
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 332 1468 1750 1077 449 224
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.03 0.25 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.5 46.4 46.4 30.9 59.7 59.7 33.7 33.7 33.7 33.7 33.7 33.7
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.23 0.11 0.12 0.50 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40
Delay/Veh: 48.7 24.8 23.7 34.3 20.2 15.3 33.1 33.1 36.8 35.4 35.4 35.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 48.7 24.8 23.7 34.3 20.2 15.3 33.1 33.1 36.8 35.4 35.4 35.4
LOS by Move: D C C C- C+ B C- C- D+ D+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 4 2 2 11 0 3 3 8 6 6 6
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3709 MONTGOMERY/PARK
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.350
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.1
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: C
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 27 Oct 2009 << 5:00-6:00PM
Base Vol: 117 237 50 18 763 37 14 126 163 216 126 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 117 237 50 18 763 37 14 126 163 216 126 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 117 237 50 18 763 37 14 126 163 216 126 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 117 237 50 18 763 37 14 126 163 216 126 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 117 237 50 18 763 37 14 126 163 216 126 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.12 0.03 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.9 40.4 40.4 28.3 45.8 45.8 42.3 42.3 42.3 42.3 42.3 42.3
Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.35 0.06 0.02 0.09 0.26 0.35 0.09 0.03
Delay/Veh: 42.7 27.6 27.2 35.4 26.6 23.4 25.4 26.1 28.0 29.1 26.1 25.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 42.7 27.6 27.2 35.4 26.6 23.4 25.4 26.1 28.0 29.1 26.1 25.5
LOS by Move: D C C D+ C C C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 2 1 1 7 1 0 1 4 6 2 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3730 PARK/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 57 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.301
Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.4
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: B+
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 29 Apr 2008 << PM
Base Vol: 18 50 18 59 124 34 22 239 25 11 251 31
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 18 50 18 59 124 34 22 239 25 11 251 31
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 18 50 18 59 124 34 22 239 25 11 251 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 18 50 18 59 124 34 22 239 25 11 251 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 18 50 18 59 124 34 22 239 25 11 251 31
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92
Lanes: 0.26 0.74 1.00 0.27 0.57 0.16 0.08 0.92 1.00 0.04 0.96 1.00
Final Sat.: 476 1324 1750 476 1000 274 152 1648 1750 76 1724 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.15 0.15 0.02
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5 27.5
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.04
Delay/Veh: 10.5 10.5 10.0 12.3 12.3 12.3 9.8 9.8 7.8 9.8 9.8 7.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 10.5 10.5 10.0 12.3 12.3 12.3 9.8 9.8 7.8 9.8 9.8 7.8
LOS by Move: B+ B+ B+ B B B A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 0 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 9-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3906 SAN CARLOS/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.421
Loss Time (sec): 9 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B-
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 4 Oct 2012 << 4:55-5:55PM
Base Vol: 6 20 16 59 60 74 55 857 27 13 481 35
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 6 20 16 59 60 74 55 857 27 13 481 35
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 6 20 16 59 60 74 55 857 27 13 481 35
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 6 20 16 59 60 74 55 857 27 13 481 35
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 6 20 16 59 60 74 55 857 27 13 481 35
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.14 0.48 0.38 0.31 0.31 0.38 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 250 833 667 535 544 671 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.23 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 12.2 12.2 12.2 14.5 14.5 15.0 29.5 29.5 7.0 21.5 21.5
Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.63 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.53 0.04 0.07 0.41 0.07
Delay/Veh: 26.7 24.6 24.6 31.0 26.3 26.3 22.4 15.4 11.9 28.7 19.5 17.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 26.7 24.6 24.6 31.0 26.3 26.3 22.4 15.4 11.9 28.7 19.5 17.2
LOS by Move: C C C C C C C+ B B+ C B- B
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 7 0 0 4 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Existing (PM) Mon May 13, 2013 16:17:49 Page 10-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSJ Traffix Database - Network Template
(Template modified Oct. 11, 2000)
(blank database)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********************************************************************************
Intersection #3969 AUZERAIS/SUNOL
********************************************************************************
Cycle (sec): 56 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.147
Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.5
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 19 Feb 2009 << 4:00-5:00PM
Base Vol: 3 7 46 14 19 21 2 166 5 15 101 16
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 3 7 46 14 19 21 2 166 5 15 101 16
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 3 7 46 14 19 21 2 166 5 15 101 16
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 3 7 46 14 19 21 2 166 5 15 101 16
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 3 7 46 14 19 21 2 166 5 15 101 16
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 0.05 0.12 0.83 0.26 0.35 0.39 0.01 0.96 0.03 0.11 0.77 0.12
Final Sat.: 94 219 1438 454 616 681 20 1679 51 199 1339 212
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 37.8 37.8 37.8 37.8 37.8 37.8
Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.11
Delay/Veh: 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.4 18.4 18.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.4 18.4 18.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.4
LOS by Move: B- B- B- B- B- B- A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
********************************************************************************
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
********************************************************************************
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SAN JOSE
Prepared by NDS/ATD
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
Total
Combined
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
10:15
Total
AM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
PM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
4:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
8:15
Volumes for: Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Location:
City: San Jose
Auzerais Avenue between Drake Avenue and Railroad Tracks.
Start
Time
12:00
12:15
12:30
12:45
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2:00
Eastbound
Morning
4
0
2
4
0
2
1
4
1
Afternoon
54
60
Hour Totals
Morning
10
7
Afternoon
57
63
52
226
53
48
44
205
46
Westbound
Morning
2
7
6
4
2
2
5
0
4
Afternoon
Project #:
Hour Totals
Morning Afternoon
52
56
51
44
48
53
48
58
19
9
203
207
47
13-7094-001
Combined Totals
Morning
29
16
Afternoon
429
412
0
3
2
0
4
1
1
1
2
3
3
1
0
1
7
9
28
18
39
30
33
55
50
57
54
69
57
69
43
48
64
53
50
72
60
57
58
79
59
60
60
70
34
36
33
23
28
23
6
6
9
9
94
168
241
208
239
256
200
107
23
20
5
2
3
3
3
0
3
7
6
2
6
9
9
3
10
19
18
26
24
43
34
53
44
65
62
48
59
55 14 209
56
51
50
50 9 207
37
48
52
48 21 185
53
62
57
70 31 242
49
40
32
35 87 156
38
33
32
29 174 132
27
32
20
15
30
40
181
342
450
415
424
498
356
239
53
58
45
46
35
41
1125
52
48
51
52
57
55
61
51
2993
8:15 AM
227
0.930
18
13 223 74
10
22
12
8 212 52
14
9
15
9 214 47
4
4
4
1 167 13
1868 1125 1868
5:15 PM
258
0.816
2993
44
42
32
55
50
43
1111
46
43
37
39
48
47
59
35
2949
7:30 AM
224
0.862
21
25 222 105
36
21
21
25 183 103
12
20
10
5 162 47
7
12
12
11 180 42
1838 1111 1838
5:00 PM
242
0.864
2949
445
395
376
347
2236
5942
179
155
94
55
3706
Percentage 37.6% 62.4% 37.7% 62.3%
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Combined
Total
AM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
PM Peak
Vol.
P.H.F.
10:15
10:30
10:45
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
Total
8:15
8:30
8:45
9:00
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
6:15
6:30
6:45
7:00
7:15
7:30
7:45
8:00
4:00
4:15
4:30
4:45
5:00
5:15
5:30
5:45
6:00
Volumes for: Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Location:
City: San Jose
Auzerais Avenue between Drake Avenue and Railroad Tracks.
Start
Time
12:00
12:15
Eastbound
Morning
1
Afternoon
Hour Totals
Morning Afternoon
31
Westbound
Morning
8
Afternoon
47
Hour Totals
Morning
Project #:
Afternoon
13-7094-001
Combined Totals
Morning Afternoon
12:30
12:45
3
4
5
45
49
45 13 170
8
5
3
40
54
48 24 189 37 359
1:00
1:15
1:30
1:45
2
1
1
2
54
50
57
70 6 231
2
2
3
4
57
58
46
46 11 207 17 438
2:00
2:15
2:30
2:45
3:00
3:15
3:30
3:45
1
4
0
2
3
4
2
0
65
57
51
63
46
73
47
63
7
9
236
229
4
2
3
0
0
2
1
4
52
47
49
48
46
50
41
47
9
7
196
184
16
16
432
413
3
7
6
6
4
5
3
4
3
41
58
57
70 15 226
61
61
59
58 20 239
44
10
9
6
5
14
2
7
5
6
47
46
57
55
46
49
57
38
43 20
30
187
205
35
50
413
444
41
41
51
53
56
56
53
60
46
46
42
53
19
17
26
28
49
50
49
1055
41
26
44
32
61
44
45 68 194
35
32
27
27 162 121
32
19
19
26 218 96
10
17
18
10 193 55
8
10
16
6
9
1876
164
180
1055
40
7
11
12
39
1876
16
18
29
47
36
42
56
48
65
47
29
32
32
27
26
36
37
35
44
45
41
50
47
1000
45
54
53
33
33
40
36
31
25
35
25
28
19
26
30
20
15
18
6
11
11
9
5
1822
77
181
189
117
152
183
1000
198
142
116
103
59
36
1822
145
343
407
310
316
363
2055
392
263
212
158
99
75
3698
2931
8:15 AM
225
0.938
4:45 PM
251
0.896
2931 2822
7:45 AM
216
0.831
12:30 PM
217
0.935
2822 5753
Percentage 36.0% 64.0% 35.4% 64.6%
GRADE CROSSING TRAFFIC AND SAFETY EVALUATION - INPUT AND OUTPUT
Existing Conditions_Auzerais Avenue - San Jose
HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION
ADT= 5,848 Average Daily Traffic on highway (vehicles per day, both directions)
N= 2 number of traffic lanes over crossing (both directions)
Paved=
Type=
V=
1
1
25
1 if highway is paved, 0 otherwise
1 if urban signalized arterial, 0 if rural or unsignalized prevailing operating speed (mph)
TRAIN TRAFFIC DESCRIPTION
See Input-2 Sheet for calculatio train speeds and traffic growth f
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Caltrain NB
Speed (mph) Daylight traiNight train Train Length (ft)
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
30.0
1
1
1
0
15
0
0
1
2
5
3,700
3,400
735
2,750
850
Caltrain SB
Amtrak
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
17
1
4
2
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
850
1,900
1,000
1,150
550
1
1
CROSSING CONFIGURATION
Type=
Tracks=
HISTORIC ACCIDENT DATA
Number of Years of Data
Number of Accidents
OUTPUT MOEs
D= 2.18 Average delay per highway vehicle (sec)
LOS=
Dtot=
D ave
PA=
PA=
A corresponding HCM intersection LOS
3.54 Total delay per day (veh-hours)
101.59 Max average delay per delayed veh (sec)
0.15694 predicted annual G/C accidents
0.03796
*predicted annual G/C accidents when considering historic accident data
2 0 = passive; 1 = flashing lights; 2 = flashing lights and gates
2 number of mainline tracks
5
0
NORMALIZING CONSTANTS (1998)
Passive
Flashing lights
Flashing lights & gates
OTHER INPUT DATA
S=
G/C=
Tlost= a=
0.7159
0.5292
0.4921
(1992)
0.8239
0.6935
0.6714
1600 saturation flow of a highway lane, vehicles per hour
0.45
effective G/C at signalized intersections downstream
35 lost time (sec) for gate operation
4 Vehicular accel/decel (ft/sec/sec)
Note: Number of trains pertains to the area south of San Jose Diridon station. Trains starting or ending service at San Jose Diridon are not included.
GRADE CROSSING TRAFFIC AND SAFETY EVALUATION - INPUT AND OUTPUT
Background Conditions_Auzerais Avenue - San Jose
HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION
ADT= 11,992 Average Daily Traffic on highway (vehicles per day, both directions)
N= 2 number of traffic lanes over crossing (both directions)
Paved=
Type=
V=
1
1
25
1 if highway is paved, 0 otherwise
1 if urban signalized arterial, 0 if rural or unsignalized prevailing operating speed (mph)
TRAIN TRAFFIC DESCRIPTION
See Input-2 Sheet for calculatio train speeds and traffic growth f
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Caltrain NB
Speed (mph) Daylight traiNight train Train Length (ft)
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
30.0
1
1
1
0
15
0
0
1
2
5
3,700
3,400
735
2,750
850
Caltrain SB
Amtrak
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
17
1
4
2
2
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
850
1,900
1,000
1,150
550
1
1
CROSSING CONFIGURATION
Type=
Tracks=
HISTORIC ACCIDENT DATA
Number of Years of Data
Number of Accidents
OUTPUT MOEs
D= 7.18 Average delay per highway vehicle (sec)
LOS=
Dtot=
D ave
PA=
PA=
A corresponding HCM intersection LOS
23.92 Total delay per day (veh-hours)
101.59 Max average delay per delayed veh (sec)
0.19386 predicted annual G/C accidents
0.04299
*predicted annual G/C accidents when considering historic accident data
2 0 = passive; 1 = flashing lights; 2 = flashing lights and gates
2 number of mainline tracks
5
0
NORMALIZING CONSTANTS (1998)
Passive
Flashing lights
Flashing lights & gates
OTHER INPUT DATA
S=
G/C=
Tlost= a=
0.7159
0.5292
0.4921
(1992)
0.8239
0.6935
0.6714
1600 saturation flow of a highway lane, vehicles per hour
0.45
effective G/C at signalized intersections downstream
35 lost time (sec) for gate operation
4 Vehicular accel/decel (ft/sec/sec)
Note: Number of trains pertains to the area south of San Jose Diridon station. Trains starting or ending service at San Jose Diridon are not included.
A
GRADE CROSSING TRAFFIC AND SAFETY EVALUATION - INPUT AND OUTPUT
2020 Cumulative Conditions without Project_Auzerais Avenue - San Jose
HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION
ADT= 12,725 Average Daily Traffic on highway (vehicles per day, both directions)
N= 2 number of traffic lanes over crossing (both directions)
Paved=
Type=
V=
1
1
25
1 if highway is paved, 0 otherwise
1 if urban signalized arterial, 0 if rural or unsignalized prevailing operating speed (mph)
TRAIN TRAFFIC DESCRIPTION
See Input-2 Sheet for calculatio train speeds and traffic growth f
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Caltrain NB
Speed (mph) Daylight traiNight train Train Length (ft)
15.0
15.0
15.0
15.0
30.0
3
3
2
0
23
0
0
2
5
8
3,700
3,400
735
2,750
850
Caltrain SB
Amtrak
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
10.0
10.0
27
1
6
3
3
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
850
1,900
1,000
1,150
550
1
1
CROSSING CONFIGURATION
Type=
Tracks=
HISTORIC ACCIDENT DATA
Number of Years of Data
Number of Accidents
OUTPUT MOEs
D= 31.22 Average delay per highway vehicle (sec)
LOS=
Dtot=
D ave
PA=
PA=
C corresponding HCM intersection LOS
110.37 Total delay per day (veh-hours)
101.59 Max average delay per delayed veh (sec)
0.24824 predicted annual G/C accidents
0.04904
*predicted annual G/C accidents when considering historic accident data
2 0 = passive; 1 = flashing lights; 2 = flashing lights and gates
2 number of mainline tracks
5
0
NORMALIZING CONSTANTS (1998)
Passive
Flashing lights
Flashing lights & gates
OTHER INPUT DATA
S=
G/C=
Tlost= a=
0.7159
0.5292
0.4921
(1992)
0.8239
0.6935
0.6714
1600 saturation flow of a highway lane, vehicles per hour
0.45
effective G/C at signalized intersections downstream
35 lost time (sec) for gate operation
4 Vehicular accel/decel (ft/sec/sec)
Note: Number of trains pertains to the area south of San Jose Diridon station. Trains starting or ending service at San Jose Diridon are not included.
GRADE CROSSING TRAFFIC AND SAFETY EVALUATION - INPUT AND OUTPUT
2020 Cumulative Conditions with Project_Auzerais Avenue - San Jose
HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION
ADT=
N=
12,725 Average Daily Traffic on highway (vehicles per day, both directions)
2 number of traffic lanes over crossing (both directions)
Paved=
Type=
V=
1
1
25
1 if highway is paved, 0 otherwise
1 if urban signalized arterial, 0 if rural or unsignalized prevailing operating speed (mph)
TRAIN TRAFFIC DESCRIPTION
See Input-2 Sheet for calculatio train speeds and traffic growth f
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Freight UPRR
Caltrain NB
Caltrain SB
Amtrak
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
ACE deahead
Speed (mph) Daylight traiNight train Train Length (ft)
15.0
15.0
3
3
0
0
3,700
3,400
15.0
15.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
2
0
23
27
1
6
3
2
5
8
3
1
0
0
735
2,750
850
850
1,900
1,000
1,150
30.0
10.0
10.0
3
0
0
0
0
0
550
1
1
CROSSING CONFIGURATION
Type=
Tracks=
HISTORIC ACCIDENT DATA
Number of Years of Data
Number of Accidents
OUTPUT MOEs
D=
LOS=
Dtot=
D ave
PA=
PA=
34.02 Average delay per highway vehicle (sec)
C corresponding HCM intersection LOS
120.24 Total delay per day (veh-hours)
103.59 Max average delay per delayed veh (sec)
0.24824 predicted annual G/C accidents
0.04904
*predicted annual G/C accidents when considering historic accident data
2 0 = passive; 1 = flashing lights; 2 = flashing lights and gates
2 number of mainline tracks
5
0
NORMALIZING CONSTANTS (1998)
Passive
Flashing lights
Flashing lights & gates
OTHER INPUT DATA
S=
G/C=
Tlost= a=
0.7159
0.5292
0.4921
(1992)
0.8239
0.6935
0.6714
1600 saturation flow of a highway lane, vehicles per hour
0.45
effective G/C at signalized intersections downstream
39 lost time (sec) for gate operation
4 Vehicular accel/decel (ft/sec/sec)
Note: Number of trains pertains to the area south of San Jose Diridon station. Trains starting or ending service at San Jose Diridon are not included.