Classroom Walls that Talk: Using Online Course Activity of

advertisement

Classroom Walls That Talk: Using

Online Course Activity of Successful

Students to Raise Awareness of

Underperforming Peers

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

AACRAO Technology Conference

July 19, 2010

Overview

• About UMBC

• Problem—Why did we do this?

• A Solution, Not THE Solution

• • Lessons Learned

• Future Plans

• Effective Practices

• Resources

• Q & A

About UMBC

• Founded in 1966

• “Research extensive university” Carnegie classification

• Fall 2009 Stats

– 12,870 Students

• 9,947 undergrad, 2,923grad

– 730 Faculty

• 480 FT, 250 PT

• Selected Brags

– #1 “Up and Coming National University”

U.S. News America’s Best Colleges, 2010

– 1 st in undergrad chemistry degrees awarded to African Americans

– One of 50 Best Colleges for Women

– 7-time National College Chess

Champions

About Blackboard @ UMBC

• Blackboard Learn 9.1

• As of Spring 2010 (began using in SP200)

– 95% of all students

– 75% of all instructors

– 65% f ll (1 645 FA2010)

– 356 Communities

• Includes all student, faculty and staff senates

• Support Staff:

– 2 FTE (Admin & Support)

– 1 Server Admin

“So, is Blackboard making a difference?”

PROBLEM

HOW DO YOU ANSWER?

Bb System Reporting

Bb Course Reporting

Questions

• Functional

– What is the relationship between Blackboard use and teaching and learning?

– What tools can we give users to shed light on (and improve) their own performance within the system?

• Technical

– How do we query the system without breaking it?

– How do we scale and maintain the process?

• Bb – Core product?

• Community – Building Blocks?

• Other?

A SOLUTION

www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports

Transparency & “Self Help”

• Show faculty what peers are doing through publicly available reports of student use.

• “Average hits per student” course rankings don’t

• New user tools build on “activity” as an indicator

(not a cause) of student success.

• We are NOT interested in if Blackboard makes good students, but how good students use

Blackboard.

How We Query Bb: Static Replica

Blackboard

(Static Replica)

Blackboard

(Production)

Queries

(PHP Scripts)

Complete copy of database made daily at 1 a.m. for reports

Cached Reports www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports

Code Download & Video Show &

Tell

• Code Download

– http://www.umbc.edu/oit/newmedia/blackboard/ stats/getthecode.php

• Video Show & Tell “Walkthrough” (same as above)

Related News

LESSONS LEARNED

Bb Activity by Grade Distribution

Bb Activity of D & F students

• Based on voluntary participation by instructors in 131 courses, students earning a D or F tend to use Bb 39 percent less than students earning higher grades .

– SP2010 21 courses | 37 percent less

– FA2009 | l

– SP2009 11 courses | 47 percent less

– FA2008 13 courses | 40 percent less

– SU2008 7 courses | 33 percent less

– SP2008 26 courses | 32 percent less

– FA2007 15 courses | 36 percent less

• Does the pattern hold true during the semester?

• What if students knew this information sooner?

Check My Activity (CMA) Tool

CMA “Dashboard”

CMA “Dashboard”

CMA Student Usage

LRC’s Tips for Engagement

LRC’s “Tips” Usage

FA2008 SCI100 Findings

• How would you describe the CMA’s view of your Bb activity compared to your peers?

– 28% “I i d b h t it h d ”

– 12% “It confirmed what I already knew”

– 42% “I’d have to use it more to see”

– 16% “I haven’t used it.”

– 2% did not respond to this question

FA2008 SCI100 Findings

• If your instructor published a GDR for past assignments, would you be more or less inclined to use the CMA before future

– 54% “More inclined”

– 10% “Less inclined

– 36% “Not sure”

Next Steps

• Quantitative

– Expand the sample of UMBC courses being studied.

– Study the demographic backgrounds of students.

• Qualitative

– Why do UMBC students use the CMA?

– Why do they return?

• Literature Review

– CMS activity as predictor vs. indicator of success.

– How do others use the CMS for intervention?

EFFECTIVE PRACTICES

New Tools & Approaches

Examples of other CMS “Data Mining” projects

` 5/30/08, Chronicle of Higher Education

` Argosy University

` Purdue University

` Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania

` South Texas College

` SUNY Buffalo

` Tiffin University

` University of Alabama

` University of Central Florida

` University System of Georgia

` Blackboard Greenhouse Grant - Project ASTRO

` OSCELOT.org, Advanced System Tracking & Reporting tool

` Hofstra University

“Colleges Mine Data to

Predict Dropouts”

“At the University System of

Georgia , researchers monitored how frequently students viewed discussion posts and content pages on course Web sites for three different courses to find connections between online success. In the graph below, students who were

"successful" received an A, B, or C in the class, and students who were "unsuccessful" received a D, F, or an incomplete.”

- 5/30/08 Chron of Higher Ed .

Educause Center for Applied Research

Most Valued CMS Features

(ECAR, 2007)

Educational Technology Framework

Exploratory Supported Strategic Mission Critical Transformative

Transition 4

Transition 2 Transition 3

Phase I

Transition 1

Phase 2

Time

Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5

Selected References

• Campbell, J.P., DeBlois, P.B. & Oblinger, D.G. (2007, July/August) Academic analytics: A new tool for a new era . EDUCAUSE Review, 42 4): pp. 41-57.

Retrieved March 3, 2009 from http://connect.educause.edu/Library/EDUCAUSE+Review/AcademicAnalyt icsANewTool/44594

• Rampell, C. (2008). Colleges Mine Data to Predict Dropouts . The Chronicle of Higher Education , 5/30/08. Retrieved March 6, 2009 from http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i38/38a00103.htm#web-course (login required)

• Young, J. (2009). College 2.0: A wired way to rate professors—and connect teachers. The Chronicle of Higher Education , January 8, 2009. Retrieved

April 23, 2009 from http://chronicle.com/free/2009/01/9311n.htm

RESOURCES

"Project ASTRO" Blackboard Greenhouse Grant

Eric Kunnen

Coordinator of Instructional Technologies

Grand Rapids Community College ekunnen@grcc.edu

Santo Nucifora

Manager of Systems Development and Innovation santo.nucifora@senecac.on.ca

STARFISH EARLY ALERT

• Identify & Detect

– Manual Flags

– Automatic Flags

– Attendance

– Instructor

– Advisor

& T k

More info: http://www.starfishsolutions.com

– Groups of Courses and Students

• Improve & Retain

– Student Communication and 360 Close Loop

STARFISH EXAMPLE

AUTOMATIC FLAGS BASED ON BLACKBOARD

GRADEBOOK/COURSE ACCESS

Administrators can set up flags to be raised that are autogenerated. Flags can be raised by the system by grades and average scores and specific gradebook columns in

Blackboard. Flags can also be raised based on students’ access to their courses in Blackboard. Additional customization is available through API’s.

Keep an Eye on “SIGNALS”

MORE INFORMATION

• Project ASTRO http://projects.oscelot.org/gf/project/astro/

• Starfish Early Alert Project Site http://www.starfishsolutions.com

P d U i it Si l P j t Sit http://www.itap.purdue.edu/tlt/signals/

• UMBC’s Blackboard Reports & CMA http://www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports

Questions? Comments

Thanks fritz@umbc.edu

www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports

Download