Tribal Law and Order Act (TLOA) Opportunities and Challenges for Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Jerry Gardner Executive Director Tribal Law and Policy Institute (TLPI) Tribal Law and Order Act (TLOA) Opportunities and Challenges for Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Opportunities Challenges Effectively addressing these opportunities and challenges Overall TLOA Opportunity: TLOA has focused federal government attention on: American Indian/Alaska Native Criminal Justice Issues Tribal Law Enforcement Tribal Justice Systems Tribal Healing to Wellness Courts Some Overall Challenges TLOA was not able to effectively address some of the most important issues due to political limitations (See Oliphant in the room) TLOA was only able to provide funding authorization (virtual $) rather than appropriations (real $) Ongoing need to hold Congress and Administration accountable to fully fund and fully implement TLOA – while fully consulting with tribes So many moving parts – TLOA provisions, reports consultations, webinars, trainings, etc. Illustration of Specific Current Challenge: Draft DOI/DOJ Long Term Plan for Tribal Detention Programs released for comment on 7/14/2011 (last Thursday) Comment Period is only one week. Due by 7/21/2011 (this Thursday) Due to Congress no late than one year from TLOA enactment 7/29/2010 Very important for Tribal Wellness Courts TLOA Overall Intent Enhanced Funding for Tribal Justice Systems Enhanced Authority for Tribal Justice Systems Enhanced Federal Cooperation and Accountability One Way to Look at TLOA Which provisions can Tribal governments take advantage of NOW? Which provisions require Federal action first? Which provisions require funding? Reauthorize/Expand Existing Programs for Funding Tribal Justice Systems Provides 5 more years of authorizations (“virtual funding”) thru FY2015 – for series of tribal justice funding acts • TLOA Section 241: Indian Alcohol and • Substance Abuse Act (1986) TLOS Section 242: Indian Tribal Justice Act (1993) Reauthorizations (continued) • TLOA Section 242: Indian Tribal Justice • • • Technical and Legal Assistance Act (PL 106559) which includes TCAP authorization TLOA Section 243: Tribal COPS TLOA Section 244: DOJ Tribal Jails Program TLOA Section 246: OJJDP Tribal Youth Program (TYP) TLOA Provisions Evidence sharing and declination data: • Requires federal prosecutors to maintain data on criminal declinations in Indian Country, and to share evidence to support prosecutions in tribal court Tribal Police Access to Criminal History Records • Many tribal police have no access to criminal history records. TLOA provides tribal police greater access to criminal history databases that provide them with essential information when detaining or arresting a suspect TLOA Provisions Federal Testimony: Requires Federal Officials who work in Indian country to testify about information gained in the scope of their duties to support a prosecution in tribal court Authorizes Deputization of Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys to prosecute reservation crimes in Federal courts and encourages Federal courts to hold cases in Indian country TLOA Provisions Increases Deputization of Tribal and State Police to Enforce Federal Law: • Enhances Special Law Enforcement Commission program to deputize officers to enforce federal laws on Indian lands Authorizes the Drug Enforcement Agency to deputize tribal police to assist on reservation drug raids Increases recruitment and retention efforts for BIA and Tribal police Expands training opportunities for BIA and Tribal police to receive training at state police academies and tribal, state, and local colleges – where Federal law enforcement training standards are met TLOA Section 221 (PL 280) Amends mandatory “Public Law 280” (18 USC 1162 & 25 USC 1321(a)) Prior to TLOA: • Now: • Retrocession required state concurrence; Secretary of Interior decided Allows for re-assumption to concurrent federal jurisdiction; no state concurrence; AG decides DOJ proposed rule TLOA Section 234 (a)-(b) Amends Indian Civil Rights Act (25 USC 1302) Prior to TLOA: • Tribal courts limited to 1 year per count Now: • Tribal courts limited to 3 years per count and 9 years per case TLOA Section 234 (a)-(b) cont. Amends Indian Civil Rights Act (25 USC 1302) • Tribal courts that exercise felony jurisdiction must provide: • Bar licensed indigent defense counsel • Bar licensed judge • Tribal criminal laws must be publicly available TLOA Section 211(b) Amends ILERA (25 USC 2802) DOI, in coordination with DOJ, must develop a long term tribal detention plan Report must be submitted to Congress within 1 year TLPI provides Tribal Healing and Wellness Courts Training and Technical Assistance Contact: diana@tlpi.org 323.650.5467 www.tlpi.org Part of the NCJA/NCAI Tribal-State Collaboration & John Harte Justice Capacity Building Mapetsi Policy Group Project funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance Senate Committee held 15 hearings (‘07-’10) confirmed longstanding crisis of violence in Indian Country: Epidemic domestic and sexual violence Non-Indian gangs/DTOs target reservations for drug smuggling and other crimes Low police presence, limited training High declination rates & inadequate federal response and coordination with local tribal justice officials Primary Causes of Indian Country Violence: Underfunded tribal justice systems Broken and Divided System ▪ Handcuffed tribal justice systems ▪ Lack of federal accountability ▪ Jurisdictional maze TLO sought to address system and funding Tribal court judges testimony confirmed significant unmet needs, huge caseloads, shoestring budgets Anecdotal information is helpful, but Congress, Administration, and tribes have no consistent source of data to argue for funding increases TLOA section 211 requires BIA to report annually on tribal court spending and unmet needs of tribal court personnel, technology, and facilities Prior to TLOA, existing federal programs to fund tribal courts had been expired 6+ years Gave appropriators excuse to not fund or under-fund Section 242 reauthorized the Indian Tribal Justice Support Act and Tribal Justice Technical & Legal Assistance Acts (BIA and DOJ tribal court programs) Section 244 reauthorize/expanded DOJ Tribal Jails program to include “Justice Center” construction Little opposition to funding, with some exceptions Federal laws and Supreme Court rulings hamper tribal justice systems and force tribal communities to rely on federal and state justice systems Despite reliance: GAO reports in Dec. 2010 that between 2005-09, U.S. Attorneys declined to prosecute 52% of reservation violent crimes, including 67% of crimes of sexual violence RESULT: Tribal courts are overseeing more violent cases, but remained subject to ICRA limit on sentencing Where there was little opposition to funding, there was significant OPPOSITION to increased authority House Judiciary Committee, December 2009 hearing: questioned tribal court fairness, capacity, and constitutionality of sentencing indigent suspect to one day in jail without licensed legal counsel Result: Sec. 234. Tribal Court Sentencing (25 U.S.C. 1302) Enhanced tribal court sentencing authority ▪ 1-3 years imprisonment, $15,000 fine, or both ▪ 9-year cap on stacked sentencing Tribal courts can stack sentences Protections for accused where D is subject to 1+ year ▪ Licensed counsel for indigent defendants ▪ Licensed / law trained judges ▪ Trial must be recorded (audio or video) ▪ Must publish laws, rules of evidence/procedure ▪ Sentencing options: tribal, BOP, state, alternatives Sec. 234. BOP Pilot, alternatives to incarceration Sec. 211. BIA-OJS Responsibilities BIA-OJS long-term plan for incarceration in Indian Country ▪ Coordinate with DOJ ▪ Consult with tribal leaders and tribal justice officials Sec. 241. IASA Reauthorization DOI (OJS/BIE)-DOJ-HHS (IHS) long-term plan for juvenile centers ▪ Consult with tribal and BIA juvenile detention centers Sec. 244. Tribal Jails Program Reauthorization / Expansion DOJ long-term plan to for incarceration in Indian Country ▪ Coordinate with BIA-OJS, IHS, BIE ▪ Consult with tribal leaders and tribal justice officials *DEADLINE OF PLAN SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS: JULY 29, 2011 Section 213. Tribal Prosecutors as SAUSA AG may deputize tribal prosecutors as SAUSAs Sec. 221. PL 280 amendment Provide outlet for tribes to call on U.S., DOJ may reassume federal jurisdiction Sec. 231. Enhanced SLECs Improve authority of tribal police to arrest all offenders, while protecting tribal sovereign immunity, providing FTCA protection Tribal participation is critical to effective implementation TLOA is clearly imperfect = does not mandate funding or overturn Oliphant But it does provide tribal court with added tools to combat crime, and lays building blocks for greater local tribal control through stronger tribal courts Tribal Law & Order Act: Implementation National Association of Drug Court Professionals National Harbor, Maryland July 18, 2011 Tribal Law & Order Act Signed in to law by President Obama on July 29, 2010. Public Law 111-211. Confirmation of Existing Practices Authorizes and mandates: – That tribal prosecutors are specifically eligible for SAUSA status, – That USAOs must designate tribal liaisons with statutorily specified duties, and – That DOJ Office of Tribal Justice become a permanent component at Main Justice. Federal Declinations When federal investigation terminated or USAO declines prosecution, US “shall coordinate” with tribal law enforcement officials. EOUSA to submit annual reports to Congress. Information Sharing Statutorily confirms existing FBI CJIS policy to allow tribal law enforcement access to “Federal criminal information databases” including NCIC (28 USC 534). Requires BIA OJS to report UCR crime data to FBI CJIS on a tribe-by-tribe basis. Public Law 280 Jurisdictional Reform Amends “Public Law 280” (18 USC 1162). Prior to TLOA, retrocession required State concurrence and approval by the Secretary of the Interior. TLOA allows for re-assumption of concurrent federal jurisdiction by the Attorney General; no State concurrence is required. Public Law 280 Jurisdictional Reform DOJ proposed rule published in Federal Register at 76 FR 29675 (May 23, 2011). Comments were due July 7, 2011. Public Law 280 Jurisdictional Reform DOJ Proposed Rule highlights: – Tribe proposes re-assumption of federal criminal jurisdiction. – Extensive consultation with tribe, federal, & state/local agencies. – Factors: improved access to criminal justice resources. – Deputy AG decides after recommendation from FBI, EOUSA, & OTJ. Felony Criminal Jurisdiction Amends Indian Civil Rights Act. Prior to TLOA: tribal courts limited to one year of imprisonment per count. Now: TLOA authorizes up to three years per count and nine years per case. Felony Criminal Jurisdiction Tribal courts that opt-in must provide: Bar-licensed indigent defense counsel, Judge with “sufficient training” to conduct criminal trial, Tribal criminal laws/rules be publicly available, and Court proceedings must be recorded. Tribal Prisoner Pilot Program DOJ Bureau of Prisons Tribal Prisoner Pilot Program. Up to 100 prisoners at BOP expense. Must be sentenced under new tribal court felony sentencing authority. Must be for a violent crime. Sentence must be for at least two years. Prisoner Re-entry BOP must notify tribe’s chief law enforcement officer when releasing to tribal jurisdiction a prisoner convicted of violent crime, drug trafficking, or sex offense. Authorizes Federal Pretrial & Probation Services to appoint officers in IC which can provide for substance abuse & other treatment services. DOJ Grant Funding Prior to TLOA: DOJ jail construction grant program was limited to construction of facilities for incarceration; tribal matching funds required. Now: allows for construction of “tribal justice centers”; no match required. Law and Order Commission Creates new Indian Law & Order Commission to conduct a comprehensive study of IC criminal justice system. Will submit report to President & Congress. Chris Chaney US DOJ Office of Tribal Justice (202) 353-0257 christopher.chaney@usdoj.gov www.justice.gov/otj