EN 50360:2001+A1:2012 SAR EVALUATION REPORT For Baoji Jiayuyutong electronic co.,Ltd Building A, 28# Longteng Street, Jianyi Village, Henggang Town, Longgang District, Shenzhen, P. R. China Model: JY-F2 Report Type: Product Type: Original Report Smartphone Test Engineer: Report Number: Report Date: Wilson Chen RDG150116005-20 2015-01-24 Bell Hu Reviewed By: SAR Engineer Prepared By: Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) 6/F, the 3rd Phase of WanLi Industrial Building, ShiHua Road, FuTian Free Trade Zone Shenzhen, Guangdong, China Tel: +86-755-33320018 Fax: +86-755-33320008 www.baclcorp.com.cn Note: This test report is prepared for the customer shown above and for the equipment described herein. It may not be duplicated or used in part without prior written consent from Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. This report is valid only with a valid digital signature. The digital signature may be available only under the Adobe software above version 7.0. Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Attestation of Test Results Company Name EUT Information EUT Description Model Number Test Date Baoji Jiayuyutong electronic co.,Ltd Smartphone JY-F2 2015-01-20 Frequency Band Max. SAR Level(s) Measured EGSM 900 0.402 W/kg 10g Head SAR 0.613 W/kg 10g Body SAR DCS 1800 0.143 W/kg 10g Head SAR 0.325 W/kg 10g Body SAR WCDMA 900 0.182 W/kg 10g Head SAR 0.269 W/kg 10g Body SAR WCDMA 2100 0.103 W/kg 10g Head SAR 0.284 W/kg 10g Body SAR Limit(W/Kg) 2.0 EN50360: 2001+A1:2012 Product standard to demonstrate the compliance of mobile phones with the basic restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (300MHz – 3GHz) EN62209-1:2006 Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices – Human models, instrumentation, and procedures – Part1:Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for hand-held devices used in close proximity to the ear (frequency range of 300 MHz to 3GHz) Applicable Standards EN62209-2:2010 Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices – Human models, instrumentation, and procedures – Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz) EN 62479:2010 Assessment of the compliance of low power electronic and electrical equipment with the basic restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (10 MHz to 300 GHz) IEEE1528:2013 Draft Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques. Note: This wireless device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure limits specified in DIRECTIVE 1999/5/EC & EN 50360:2001+A1:2012 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement procedures specified in EN62209-1:2006 & EN62209-2:2010. The results and statements contained in this report pertain only to the device(s) evaluated. SAR Evaluation Report 2 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY ......................................................................................................................... 4 EUT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................... 5 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ......................................................................................................................................... 5 REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUILDELINES ............................................................................................... 6 SAR LIMITS ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 FACILITIES .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................... 9 EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION ............................................................................................................. 16 EQUIPMENTS LIST & CALIBRATION INFORMATION .................................................................................................... 16 SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION .............................................................................................. 17 LIQUID VERIFICATION ............................................................................................................................................... 17 SYSTEM ACCURACY VERIFICATION ........................................................................................................................... 20 SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION DATA ..................................................................................................................... 22 EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 28 TEST POSITIONS FOR DEVICE OPERATING NEXT TO A PERSON’S EAR........................................................................ 28 CHEEK/TOUCH POSITION ........................................................................................................................................... 29 EAR/TILT POSITION ................................................................................................................................................... 29 TEST POSITIONS FOR BODY-WORN AND OTHER CONFIGURATIONS .............................................................................. 30 SAR EVALUATION PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................................. 31 TEST METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 31 CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT ........................................................................................... 32 PROVISION APPLICABLE ............................................................................................................................................ 32 TEST PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 TEST RESULTS: .......................................................................................................................................................... 32 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 35 TEST RESULTS: .......................................................................................................................................................... 35 SAR PLOTS (SUMMARY OF THE HIGHEST SAR VALUES) .......................................................................................... 38 APPENDIX A MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ............................................................................................... 46 APPENDIX B PROBE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES .................................................................................... 47 APPENDIX C DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES .................................................................................. 57 APPENDIX D EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS .................................................................................................... 84 LIQUID DEPTH ≥ 15CM ............................................................................................................................................ 84 BODY-WORN BACK SETUP PHOTO ............................................................................................................................. 84 LEFT HEAD CHEEK SETUP PHOTO.............................................................................................................................. 85 LEFT HEAD TILT SETUP PHOTO ................................................................................................................................. 85 RIGHT HEAD CHEEK SETUP PHOTO ........................................................................................................................... 86 RIGHT HEAD TILT SETUP PHOTO ............................................................................................................................... 86 APPENDIX E EUT PHOTOS .................................................................................................................................... 87 EUT – FRONT VIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 87 EUT – BACK VIEW .................................................................................................................................................... 87 EUT – LEFT SIDE VIEW ............................................................................................................................................. 88 EUT – RIGHT SIDE VIEW ........................................................................................................................................... 88 EUT – TOP VIEW ....................................................................................................................................................... 89 EUT – BOTTOM VIEW................................................................................................................................................ 89 EUT – UNCOVERED VIEW ......................................................................................................................................... 90 APPENDIX F INFORMATIVE REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 91 SAR Evaluation Report 3 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY Revision Number Report Number Description of Revision Date of Revision 0 RDG150116005-20 Original Report 2015-01-22 SAR Evaluation Report 4 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EUT DESCRIPTION This report has been prepared on behalf of Baoji Jiayuyutong electronic co.,Ltd and their product, Model: JY-F2 or the EUT (Equipment Under Test) as referred to in the rest of this report. Technical Specification Product Type Exposure Category: Antenna Type(s): Body-Worn Accessories: Face-Head Accessories: Multi-slot Class: Operation Mode : Portable Population / Uncontrolled Internal Antenna Headset None Class 12 GSM Voice, GPRS Data, WCDMA, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth EGSM900 Band: 880-915 MHz(TX); 925-960 MHz(RX) DCS1800 Band: 1710-1785 MHz(TX); 1805-1880 MHz(RX) Frequency Band: WCDMA900: 880-915 MHz(TX); 925-960 MHz(RX) WCDMA2100: 1920-1980MHz(TX); 2110-2170MHz(RX) WIFI: 2412-2472MHz Bluetooth: 2402-2480 MHz EGSM 900: 32.50 dBm DCS 1800: 29.60Bm Conducted RF Power: WCDMA 900:22.75dBm WCDMA 2100: 22.28dBm Wi-Fi: 12.60dBm Bluetooth: 3.21dBm Dimensions (L*W*H): Power Source: Normal Operation: SAR Evaluation Report 144mm (L)× 70mm (W)×10mm (H) 3.8VDC Rechargeable Battery Head and Body worn 5 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 REFERENCE, STANDARDS, AND GUILDELINES FCC: The Report and Order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 1.6 mW/g as recommended by the ANSI/IEEE standard C95.1-1992 [6] for an uncontrolled environment (Paragraph 65). According to the Supplement C of OET Bulletin 65 “Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guide-lines for Human Exposure to Radio frequency Electromagnetic Fields", released on Jun 29, 2001 by the FCC, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in North America is 1.6 mW/g average over 1 gram of tissue mass. CE: The order requires routine SAR evaluation prior to equipment authorization of portable transmitter devices, including portable telephones. For consumer products, the applicable limit is 2 mW/g as recommended by EN62209-1 for an uncontrolled environment. According to the Standard, the device should be evaluated at maximum output power (radiated from the antenna) under “worst-case” conditions for normal or intended use, incorporating normal antenna operating positions, device peak performance frequencies and positions for maximum RF energy coupling. This report describes the methodology and results of experiments performed on wireless data terminal. The objective was to determine if there is RF radiation and if radiation is found, what is the extent of radiation with respect to safety limits. SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is the measure of RF exposure determined by the amount of RF energy absorbed by human body (or its parts) – to determine how the RF energy couples to the body or head which is a primary health concern for body worn devices. The limit below which the exposure to RF is considered safe by regulatory bodies in Europe is 2 mW/g average over 10 gram of tissue mass. The test configurations were laid out on a specially designed test fixture to ensure the reproducibility of measurements. Each configuration was scanned for SAR. Analysis of each scan was carried out to characterize the above effects in the device. SAR Evaluation Report 6 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR Limits FCC Limit (1g Tissue) SAR (W/kg) (General Population / Uncontrolled Exposure Environment) (Occupational / Controlled Exposure Environment) Spatial Average (averaged over the whole body) 0.08 0.4 Spatial Peak (averaged over any 1 g of tissue) 1.60 8.0 Spatial Peak (hands/wrists/feet/ankles averaged over 10 g) 4.0 20.0 EXPOSURE LIMITS CE Limit (10g Tissue) SAR (W/kg) EXPOSURE LIMITS (General Population / Uncontrolled Exposure Environment) (Occupational / Controlled Exposure Environment) Spatial Average (averaged over the whole body) 0.08 0.4 Spatial Peak (averaged over any 10 g of tissue) 2.0 10 Spatial Peak (hands/wrists/feet/ankles averaged over 10 g) 4.0 20.0 Population/Uncontrolled Environments are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individual who have no knowledge or control of their exposure. Occupational/Controlled Environments are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by people who are aware of the potential for exposure (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). General Population/Uncontrolled environments Spatial Peak limit 1.6W/kg (FCC) & 2 W/kg (CE) applied to the EUT. SAR Evaluation Report 7 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 FACILITIES The test site used by Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) to collect data is located at 6/F, the 3rd Phase of WanLi Industrial Building, Shi Hua Road, Fu Tian Free Trade Zone, Shenzhen, Guangdong, P.R. of China SAR Evaluation Report 8 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 DESCRIPTION OF TEST SYSTEM These measurements were performed with ALSAS 10 Universal Integrated SAR Measurement system from APREL Laboratories. ALSAS-10U System Description ALSAS-10-U is fully compliant with the technical and scientific requirements of IEEE 1528, IEC 62209, CENELEC, ARIB, ACA, and the Federal Communications Commission. The system comprises of a six axes articulated robot which utilizes a dedicated controller. ALSAS-10U uses the latest methodologies. And FDTD modeling to provide a platform which is repeatable with minimum uncertainty. Applications Predefined measurement procedures compliant with the guidelines of CENELEC, IEEE, IEC, FCC, etc are utilized during the assessment for the device. Automatic detection for all SAR maxima are embedded within the core architecture for the system, ensuring that peak locations used for centering the zoom scan are within a 1mm resolution and a 0.05mm repeatable position. System operation range currently available up-to 6 GHz in simulated tissue. Area Scans Area scans are defined prior to the measurement process being executed with a user defined variable spacing between each measurement point (integral) allowing low uncertainty measurements to be conducted. Scans defined for FCC applications utilize a 10mm2 step integral, with 1mm interpolation used to locate the peak SAR area used for zoom scan assessments. Where the system identifies multiple SAR peaks (which are within 25% of peak value) the system will provide the user with the option of assessing each peak location individually for zoom scan averaging. Zoom Scan (Cube Scan Averaging) The averaging zoom scan volume utilized in the ALSAS-10U software is in the shape of a cube and the side dimension of a 1 g or 10 g mass is dependent on the density of the liquid representing the simulated tissue. A density of 1000 kg/m3 is used to represent the head and body tissue density and not the phantom liquid density, in order to be consistent with the definition of the liquid dielectric properties, i.e. the side length of the 1 g cube is 10mm,with the side length of the 10 g cube 21,5mm. When the cube intersects with the surface of the phantom, it is oriented so that 3 vertices touch the surface of the shell or the center of a face is tangent to the surface. The face of the cube closest to the surface is modified in order to conform to the tangent surface. The zoom scan integer steps can be user defined so as to reduce uncertainty, but normal practice for typical test applications (including FCC) utilize a physical step of 5x5x8 (8mmx8mmx5mm) providing a volume of 32mm in the X & Y axis, and 35mm in the Z axis. SAR Evaluation Report 9 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 ALSAS-10U Interpolation and Extrapolation Uncertainty The overall uncertainty for the methodology and algorithms the used during the SAR calculation was evaluated using the data from IEEE 1528 based on the example f3 algorithm: Isotropic E-Field Probe The isotropic E-Field probe has been fully calibrated and assessed for isotropicity, and boundary effect within a controlled environment. Depending on the frequency for which the probe is calibrated the method utilized for calibration will change. The E-Field probe utilizes a triangular sensor arrangement as detailed in the diagram below: SAR is assessed with a calibrated probe which moves at a default height of 5mm from the center of the diode, which is mounted to the sensor, to the phantom surface (in the Z Axis). The 5mm offset height has been selected so as to minimize any resultant boundary effect due to the probe being in close proximity to the phantom surface. The following algorithm is an example of the function used by the system for linearization of the output from the probe when measuring complex modulation schemes. SAR Evaluation Report 10 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Isotropic E-Field Probe Specification Calibration Method Sensitivity Dynamic Range Isotropic Response Diode Compression Point (DCP) Probe Tip Diameter Frequency Dependent Below 1 GHz Calibration in air performed in a TEM Cell Above 1 GHz Calibration in air performed in waveguide 0.70 μV/(V/m)2 to 0.85 μV/(V/m)2 0.0005 W/kg to 100 W/kg Better than 0.1 dB Calibration for Specific Frequency < 2.9 mm Sensor Offset 1.56 (+/- 0.02 mm) Probe Length 289 mm Video Bandwidth Boundary Effect Spatial Resolution @ 500 Hz: 1 dB @ 1.02 kHz: 3 dB Less than 2.1% for distance greater than 0.58 mm The spatial resolution uncertainty is less than 1.5% for 4.9mm diameter probe. The spatial resolution uncertainty is less than 1.0% for 2.5mm diameter probe Boundary Detection Unit and Probe Mounting Device ALSAS-10U incorporates a boundary detection unit with a sensitivity of 0.05mm for detecting all types of surfaces. The robust design allows for detection during probe tilt (probe normalize) exercises, and utilizes a second stage emergency stop. The signal electronics are fed directly into the robot controller for high accuracy surface detection in lateral and axial detection modes (X, Y, & Z). The probe is mounted directly onto the Boundary Detection unit for accurate tooling and displacement calculations controlled by the robot kinematics. The probe is connect to an isolated probe interconnect where the output stage of the probe is fed directly into the amplifier stage of the Daq-Paq. Daq-Paq (Analog to Digital Electronics) ALSAS-10U incorporates a fully calibrated Daq-Paq (analog to digital conversion system) which has a 4 channel input stage, sent via a 2 stage auto-set amplifier module. The input signal is amplified accordingly so as to offer a dynamic range from 5µV to 800mV. Integration of the fields measured is carried out at board level utilizing a Co-Processor which then sends the measured fields down into the main computational module in digitized form via an RS232 communications port. Probe linearity and duty cycle compensation is carried out within the main Daq-Paq module. ADC 12 Bit Amplifier Range 20 mV to 200 mV and 150 mV to 800 mV Field Integration Local Co-Processor utilizing proprietary integration algorithms Number of Input Channels Communication SAR Evaluation Report 4 in total 3 dedicated and 1 spare Packet data via RS232 11 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Axis Articulated Robot ALSAS-10U utilizes a six axis articulated robot, which is controlled using a Pentium based real-time movement controller. The movement kinematics engine utilizes proprietary (Thermo CRS) interpolation and extrapolation algorithms, which allow full freedom of movement for each of the six joints within the working envelope. Utilization of joint 6 allows for full probe rotation with a tolerance better than 0.05mm around the central axis. Robot/Controller Manufacturer Number of Axis Positioning Repeatability Controller Type Robot Reach Communication Thermo CRS Six independently controlled axis 0.05 mm Single phase Pentium based C500C 710 mm RS232 and LAN compatible ALSAS Universal Workstation ALSAS Universal workstation allows for repeatability and fast adaptability. It allows users to do calibration, testing and measurements using different types of phantoms with one set up, which significantly speeds up the measurement process. SAR Evaluation Report 12 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Universal Device Positioner The universal device positioner allows complete freedom of movement of the EUT. Developed to hold a EUT in a free-space scenario any additional loading attributable to the material used in the construction of the positioner has been eliminated. Repeatability has been enhanced through the linear scales which form the design used to indicate positioning for any given test scenario in all major axes. A 15° tilt indicator is included for the of aid cheek to tilt movements for head SAR analysis. Overall uncertainty for measurements have been reduced due to the design of the Universal device positioner, which allows positioning of a device in as near to a free-space scenario as possible, and by providing the means for complete repeatability. Phantom Types The ALSAS-10U allows the integration of multiple phantom types. SAM Phantoms fully compliant with IEEE 1528, Universal Phantom, and Universal Flat. APREL SAM Phantoms The SAM phantoms developed using the IEEE SAM CAD file. They are fully compliant with the requirements for both IEEE 1528 and FCC Supplement C. Both the left and right SAM phantoms are interchangeable, transparent and include the IEEE 1528 grid with visible NF and MB lines. SAR Evaluation Report 13 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APREL Laboratories Universal Phantom The Universal Phantom is used on the ALSAS-10U as a system validation phantom. The Universal Phantom has been fully validated both experimentally from 800MHz to 6GHz and numerically using XFDTD numerical software. The shell thickness is 2mm overall, with a 4mm spacer located at the NF/MB intersection providing an overall thickness of 6mm in line with the requirements of IEEE-1528. The design allows for fast and accurate measurements, of handsets, by allowing the conservative SAR to be evaluated at on frequency for both left and right head experiments in one measurement. Tissue Dielectric Parameters for Head and Body Phantoms The head tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the EN62209-1:2006 have been incorporated in the following table. These head parameters are derived from planar layer models simulating the highest expected SAR for the dielectric properties and tissue thickness variations in a human head. Other head and body tissue parameters recommended in EN62209-2:2010. EN62209-1:2006 Recommended Tissue Dielectric Parameters SAR Evaluation Report Head Tissue Frequency (MHz) εr Ơ (S/m) 150 52.3 0.76 300 45.3 0.87 450 43.5 0.87 835 41.5 0.90 900 41.5 0.97 915 41.5 0.98 1450 40.5 1.20 1610 40.3 1.29 1800-2000 40.0 1.40 2450 39.2 1.80 3000 38.5 2.40 5800 35.3 5.27 14 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EN62209-2:2010 Recommended Body Tissue Dielectric Parameters SAR Evaluation Report Body Tissue Frequency (MHz) εr Ơ (S/m) 450 43.5 0.87 835 41.5 0.90 900 41.5 0.97 1800 40.0 1.40 1900 40.0 1.40 2450 39.2 1.80 4000 37.4 3.43 5000 36.2 4.45 15 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EQUIPMENT LIST AND CALIBRATION Equipments List & Calibration Information Equipment Model Calibration Date S/N CRS F3 robot ALS-F3 N/A RAF0805352 CRS F3 Software ALS-F3-SW N/A N/A CRS C500C controller ALS-C500 N/A RCF0805379 Probe mounting device & Boundary Detection Sensor System ALS-PMDPS-3 N/A 120-00270 Universal Work Station ALS-UWS N/A 100-00157 Data Acquisition Package ALS-DAQ-PAQ-3 2014-10-14 110-00212 Miniature E-Field Probe ALS-E-020 2014-10-14 500-00283 Dipole, 900MHz ALS-D-900-S-2 2014-10-08 190-00609 Dipole, 1750MHz ALS-D-1750-S-2 2013-10-08 198-00304 Dipole,1900MHz ALS-D-1900-S-2 2014-10-09 210-00710 Dipole Spacer ALS-DS-U N/A 250-00907 Device holder/Positioner ALS-H-E-SET-2 N/A 170-00510 Left ear SAM phantom ALS-P-SAM-L N/A 130-00311 Right ear SAM phantom ALS-P-SAM-R N/A 140-00359 UniPhantom ALS-P-UP-1 N/A 150-00413 Simulated Tissue 900 MHz Head and Body ALS-TS-900-H Each Time 280-01054 Simulated Tissue 1750 MHz Head and Body ALS-TS-1750-H Each Time 290-01105 Simulated Tissue 1900 MHz Head and Body ALS-TS-1900-H Each Time 295-01103 Power Amplifier 5S1G4 N/A 71377 Directional couple DC6180A 2013-11-12 0325849 Attenuator 3dB 2014-05-08 5402 Network analyzer 8752C 2014-06-03 3410A02356 Dielectric probe kit HP85070B N/A N/A Synthesized Sweeper HP 8341B 2014-06-03 2624A00116 UNIVERSAL RADIO COMMUNICATION TESTER CMU200 2013-11-23 106891 EMI Test Receiver ESCI 2014-06-13 101746 SAR Evaluation Report 16 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM VERIFICATION Liquid Verification Liquid Verification Setup Block Diagram Liquid Verification Results Frequency (MHz) Liquid Type 880.2 Liquid Parameter Target Value Delta (%) Tolerance (%) εr Ơ (S/m) εr Ơ (S/m) Δ εr ΔƠ Head and Body 41.33 0.96 41.50 0.97 -0.410 -1.031 ±5 882.6 Head and Body 41.48 0.97 41.50 0.97 -0.048 0.000 ±5 897.6 Head and Body 41.25 0.99 41.50 0.97 -0.602 2.062 ±5 902.0 Head and Body 41.46 0.99 41.50 0.97 -0.096 2.062 ±5 912.4 Head and Body 41.36 1.00 41.50 0.97 -0.337 3.093 ±5 914.8 Head and Body 41.28 1.00 41.50 0.97 -0.530 3.093 ±5 1710.2 Head and Body 39.37 1.37 40.00 1.40 -1.575 -2.143 ±5 1747.8 Head and Body 39.55 1.41 40.00 1.40 -1.125 0.714 ±5 1784.8 Head and Body 39.44 1.45 40.00 1.40 -1.400 3.571 ±5 1922.4 Head and Body 40.01 1.35 40.00 1.40 0.025 -3.571 ±5 1950.0 Head and Body 40.05 1.45 40.00 1.40 0.125 3.571 ±5 1977.6 Head and Body 40.56 1.38 40.00 1.40 1.400 -1.429 ±5 *Liquid Verification was performed on 2015-01-20 Please refer to the following tables. SAR Evaluation Report 17 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) 900 MHz Head and Body Frequency (MHz) 880.0 880.7 881.4 882.1 882.8 883.5 884.2 884.9 885.6 886.3 887.0 887.7 888.4 889.1 889.8 890.5 891.2 891.9 892.6 893.3 894.0 894.7 895.4 896.1 896.8 897.5 898.2 898.9 899.6 900.3 901.0 901.7 902.4 903.1 903.8 904.5 905.2 905.9 906.6 907.3 908.0 908.7 909.4 910.1 910.8 911.5 912.2 912.9 913.6 914.3 915.0 1750 MHz Head and Body e' e'' 41.3288 41.2421 41.2365 41.4236 41.4772 41.2080 41.4360 41.3590 41.3011 41.3602 41.3648 41.2794 41.2006 41.3297 41.3313 41.4269 41.3468 41.3700 41.2256 41.4115 41.2524 41.2872 41.4536 41.3694 41.4273 41.2538 41.4144 41.2055 41.4356 41.2226 41.2757 41.4581 41.2314 41.4642 41.3134 41.4730 41.4517 41.4558 41.3111 41.3699 41.1902 41.4336 41.3707 41.3213 41.3517 41.2986 41.3627 41.2049 41.2444 41.2587 41.2839 19.6967 19.7304 19.7021 19.6777 19.6924 19.7621 19.7778 19.7891 19.6175 19.6909 19.6194 19.6242 19.6770 19.7265 19.6302 19.7101 19.7002 19.6668 19.6389 19.7349 19.6247 19.7193 19.6786 19.7131 19.6698 19.7434 19.7784 19.6390 19.7441 19.6019 19.7995 19.6526 19.6522 19.6250 19.6944 19.7474 19.6960 19.7333 19.6266 19.7485 19.7367 19.7617 19.6421 19.7643 19.6975 19.7260 19.6536 19.7866 19.7054 19.6916 19.6927 SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 Frequency (MHz) 1710.0 1711.5 1713.0 1714.5 1716.0 1717.5 1719.0 1720.5 1722.0 1723.5 1725.0 1726.5 1728.0 1729.5 1731.0 1732.5 1734.0 1735.5 1737.0 1738.5 1740.0 1741.5 1743.0 1744.5 1746.0 1747.5 1749.0 1750.5 1752.0 1753.5 1755.0 1756.5 1758.0 1759.5 1761.0 1762.5 1764.0 1765.5 1767.0 1768.5 1770.0 1771.5 1773.0 1774.5 1776.0 1777.5 1779.0 1780.5 1782.0 1783.5 1785.0 e' e'' 39.5951 39.2618 39.3285 39.4180 39.5911 39.3513 39.2004 39.5717 39.2554 39.5251 39.1860 39.3497 39.3211 39.1011 39.4715 39.3682 39.4489 39.6091 39.5386 39.2730 39.5243 39.2369 39.4662 39.4367 39.2635 39.4415 39.1337 39.1390 39.2859 39.0900 39.1787 39.4120 39.5061 39.2778 39.2126 39.1336 39.5477 39.4798 39.1717 39.6375 39.5081 39.1799 39.3305 39.6448 39.2852 39.2293 39.4186 39.5756 39.2156 39.2170 39.2135 14.1655 14.5224 14.2920 14.2295 14.4075 14.5792 14.5103 14.2675 14.3914 14.1737 14.5526 14.4013 14.3065 14.2158 14.0876 14.3517 14.3154 14.0948 14.5273 14.3753 14.4589 14.4488 14.2960 14.3005 14.3594 14.4948 14.4319 14.4702 14.1556 14.2467 14.4871 14.4288 14.1860 14.2550 14.1194 14.4845 14.1013 14.5705 14.4442 14.1633 14.2045 14.5423 14.4502 14.1155 14.5640 14.3834 14.5169 14.0953 14.1810 14.3909 14.5628 18 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 1900 MHz Head and Body Frequency (MHz) 1920.0 1921.2 1922.4 1923.6 1924.8 1926.0 1927.2 1928.4 1929.6 1930.8 1932.0 1933.2 1934.4 1935.6 1936.8 1938.0 1939.2 1940.4 1941.6 1942.8 1944.0 1945.2 1946.4 1947.6 1948.8 1950.0 1951.2 1952.4 1953.6 1954.8 1956.0 1957.2 1958.4 1959.6 1960.8 1962.0 1963.2 1964.4 1965.6 1966.8 1968.0 1969.2 1970.4 1971.6 1972.8 1974.0 1975.2 1976.4 1977.6 1978.8 1980.0 SAR Evaluation Report e' e'' 40.7144 40.1224 40.2209 40.1836 40.7207 40.0817 40.2652 40.4615 40.6837 40.2825 40.7309 40.6288 40.7423 40.0079 40.6934 40.0314 40.5387 40.0803 40.1538 39.9839 40.6407 40.1817 40.6453 40.5641 40.0117 40.3309 40.6147 40.3682 40.5649 40.6295 40.4842 40.1654 40.5106 40.0838 40.6032 40.2455 40.4595 40.7429 40.6838 40.7266 40.0471 40.3498 40.3518 40.7398 40.6288 40.7417 40.6349 40.5066 40.0807 40.3196 40.5654 12.7885 12.5824 13.3866 12.9875 12.9512 12.9594 12.9336 13.1597 13.2820 12.7419 12.9952 13.0886 13.1982 12.5671 13.3687 12.6087 12.5175 13.2117 12.9111 12.9028 12.8290 13.2299 12.7073 12.5567 12.8890 12.6168 12.8758 12.5563 12.7335 12.6081 12.8337 13.0739 12.7961 12.6425 13.1025 12.8560 13.1587 13.0992 13.1956 12.9798 12.5898 12.7302 12.7012 12.7167 13.1185 12.5062 12.5651 12.5562 12.1530 12.9017 13.1551 19 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 System Accuracy Verification Prior to the assessment, the system validation kit was used to test whether the system was operating within its specifications of ±10%. The validation results are tabulated below. And also the corresponding SAR plot is attached as well in the SAR plots files. System Verification Setup Block Diagram Probe and dipole antenna List and Detail Serial Calibration Calibration Number Date Due Date ALS-E-020 500-00283 2014-10-14 2015-10-13 Dipole antenna(900MHz) ALS-D-900-S-2 190-00609 2014-10-08 2017-10-07 APREL Dipole antenna(1750MHz) ALS-D-1750-S-2 198-00304 2013-10-08 2016-10-07 APREL Dipole antenna(1900MHz) ALS-D-1900-S-2 210-00710 2014-10-09 2017-10-08 Manufacturer Description Model APREL Probe APREL System Accuracy Check Results Date 2015-01-20 Frequency Band Liquid Type Measured SAR (W/Kg) Target Value (W/Kg) Delta (%) Tolerance (%) 900 Head and Body 10g 7.758 7.595 2.146 ±10 1750 Head and Body 10g 18.539 18.99 -2.375 ±10 1900 Head and Body 10g 19.818 20.44 -3.043 ±10 All SAR values are normalized to 1 Watt forward power. SAR Evaluation Report 20 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EN62209-1:2006 recommended reference value for Head Tissue Frequency (MHz) 1 g SAR (W/Kg) 10 g SAR (W/Kg) Local SAR at surface (above feed point) Local SAR at surface (y=2cm offset from feed point) 300 450 835 900 1450 1800 1900 2000 2450 3000 3.0 4.9 9.5 10.8 29.0 38.1 39.7 41.1 52.4 63.8 2.0 3.3 6.2 6.9 16.0 19.8 20.5 21.1 24.0 25.7 4.4 7.2 14.1 16.4 50.2 69.5 72.1 74.6 104.2 140.2 2.1 3.2 4.9 5.4 6.5 6.8 6.6 6.5 7.7 9.5 EN62209-2:2010 recommended reference value for Body Tissue Frequency (MHz) 1 g SAR (W/Kg) 10 g SAR (W/Kg) Local SAR at surface (above feed point) Local SAR at surface (y=2cm offset from feed point) 300 450 835 900 1450 1800 1900 2000 2450 3000 2.85 4.58 9.56 10.9 29.0 38.4 39.7 41.1 52.4 63.8 1.94 3.06 6.22 6.99 16.0 20.1 20.5 21.1 24.0 25.7 4.14 6.75 14.6 16.4 50.2 69.5 72.1 74.6 104 140 2.00 2.98 4.90 5.40 6.50 6.80 6.60 6.50 7.70 9.50 SAR Evaluation Report 21 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION DATA Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) System Performance Check 900 MHz Liquid Dipole 900 MHz; Type: ALS-D-900-S-2; S/N: 190-00609 Product Data Device Name Serial No. Type Model Frequency Band Max. Transmit Pwr Drift Time Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : Dipole 900 MHz : 190-00609 : Dipole : ALS-D-900-S-2 : 900 :1W : 3 min(s) : 12.169 W/kg : 12.322 W/kg : 2.108 Phantom Data Name Type Serial No. Location Description : APREL-Uni : Uni-Phantom : System Default : Center : Default Tissue Data Type Serial No. Frequency Last Calib. Date Temperature Ambient Temp. Humidity Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 280-01054 : 900.00 MHz : 20-Jan-2015 : 20.00 °C : 21.00 °C : 50.00 RH% : 41.35 F/m : 0.98 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. M Probe Data Name Model Type Serial No. Last Calib. Date Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : E-Field : E-020 : E-Field Triangle : 500-00283 : 14-Oct-2014 : 900 :1 :6 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm Measurement Data Crest Factor Scan Type Tissue Temp. Ambient Temp. Area Scan Zoom Scan :1 : Complete : 20.00 °C : 20.00 °C : 7x9x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm SAR Evaluation Report µV/(V/m)2 22 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR Report No: RDG150116005-20 : 11.835 W/kg : 7.758 W/kg : 12.40 W/kg : 18.682 W/kg 900 MHz System Validation SAR Evaluation Report 23 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) System Performance Check 1750 MHz Liquid Dipole 1750 MHz; Type: ALS-D-1750-S-2; S/N: 198-00304 Product Data Device Name Serial No. Type Model Frequency Band Max. Transmit Pwr Drift Time Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : Dipole 1750MHHz : 198-00304 : Dipole : ALS-D-1750-S-2 : 1750 :1W : 3 min(s) : 36.133 W/kg : 36.568 W/kg : 1.216 Phantom Data Name Type Serial No. Location Description : APREL-Uni : Uni-Phantom : System Default : Center : Default Tissue Data Type Serial No. Frequency Last Calib. Date Temperature Ambient Temp. Humidity Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 290-01105 : 1750 MHz : 20-Jan-2015 : 20.00 °C : 21.00 °C : 50.00 RH% : 39.13 F/m : 1.41 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. M Probe Data Name Model Type Serial No. Last Calib. Date Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : E-Field : E-020 : E-Field Triangle : 500-00283 : 14-Oct-2014 : 1750 :1 : 5.4 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm Measurement Data Crest Factor Scan Type Tissue Temp. Ambient Temp. Area Scan Zoom Scan :1 : Complete : 20.00 °C : 20.00 °C : 7x9x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm SAR Evaluation Report µV/(V/m)2 24 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR Report No: RDG150116005-20 : 37.428 W/kg : 18.539 W/kg : 40.920 W/kg : 66.233 W/kg 1750 MHz System Validation SAR Evaluation Report 25 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) System Performance Check 1900 MHz Liquid Dipole 1900 MHz; Type: ALS-D-1900-S-2; S/N: 210-00710 Product Data Device Name Serial No. Type Model Frequency Band Max. Transmit Pwr Drift Time Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : Dipole 1900MHz : 210-00710 : Dipole : ALS-D-1900-S-2 : 1900 :1W : 3 min(s) : 22.620 W/kg : 22.406 W/kg : -1.063 Phantom Data Name Type Serial No. Location Description : APREL-Uni : Uni-Phantom : System Default : Center : Default Tissue Data Type Serial No. Frequency Last Calib. Date Temperature Ambient Temp. Humidity Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 295-01103 : 1900.00 MHz : 20-Jan-2015 : 20.00 °C : 21.00 °C : 56.00 RH% : 40.56 F/m : 1.37 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Name Model Type Serial No. Last Calib. Date Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : E-Field : E-020 : E-Field Triangle : 500-00283 : 14-Oct-2014 : 1900 :1 : 4.8 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm Measurement Data Crest Factor Scan Type Tissue Temp. Ambient Temp. Area Scan Zoom Scan :1 : Complete : 20.00 °C : 21.00 °C : 8x10x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm SAR Evaluation Report µV/(V/m)2 26 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR Report No: RDG150116005-20 : 38.206 W/kg : 19.818 W/kg : 41.760 W/kg : 65.375 W/kg 1900 MHz System Validation SAR Evaluation Report 27 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EUT TEST STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY Test Positions for Device Operating Next to a Person’s Ear This category includes most wireless handsets with fixed, retractable or internal antennas located toward the top half of the device, with or without a foldout, sliding or similar keypad cover. The handset should have its earpiece located within the upper ¼ of the device, either along the centerline or off-centered, as perceived by its users. This type of handset should be positioned in a normal operating position with the “test device reference point” located along the “vertical centerline” on the front of the device aligned to the “ear reference point”. The “test device reference point” should be located at the same level as the center of the earpiece region. The “vertical centerline” should bisect the front surface of the handset at its top and bottom edges. A “ear reference point” is located on the outer surface of the head phantom on each ear spacer. It is located 1.5 cm above the center of the ear canal entrance in the “phantom reference plane” defined by the three lines joining the center of each “ear reference point” (left and right) and the tip of the mouth. A handset should be initially positioned with the earpiece region pressed against the ear spacer of a head phantom. For the SCC-34/SC-2 head phantom, the device should be positioned parallel to the “N-F” line defined along the base of the ear spacer that contains the “ear reference point”. For interim head phantoms, the device should be positioned parallel to the cheek for maximum RF energy coupling. The “test device reference point” is aligned to the “ear reference point” on the head phantom and the “vertical centerline” is aligned to the “phantom reference plane”. This is called the “initial ear position”. While maintaining these three alignments, the body of the handset is gradually adjusted to each of the following positions for evaluating SAR: F LE ER P M B 15 mm EE P ERP - ear reference i t- entrance to ear EEP l SAR Evaluation Report N 28 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Cheek/Touch Position The device is brought toward the mouth of the head phantom by pivoting against the “ear reference point” or along the “N-F” line for the SCC-34/SC-2 head phantom. This test position is established: o When any point on the display, keypad or mouthpiece portions of the handset is in contact with the phantom. o (or) When any portion of a foldout, sliding or similar keypad cover opened to its intended self-adjusting normal use position is in contact with the cheek or mouth of the phantom. For existing head phantoms – when the handset loses contact with the phantom at the pivoting point, rotation should continue until the device touches the cheek of the phantom or breaks its last contact from the ear spacer. Cheek /Touch Position Ear/Tilt Position With the handset aligned in the “Cheek/Touch Position”: 1) If the earpiece of the handset is not in full contact with the phantom’s ear spacer (in the “Cheek/Touch position”) and the peak SAR location for the “Cheek/Touch” position is located at the ear spacer region or corresponds to the earpiece region of the handset, the device should be returned to the “initial ear position” by rotating it away from the mouth until the earpiece is in full contact with the ear spacer. 2) (otherwise) The handset should be moved (translated) away from the cheek perpendicular to the line passes through both “ear reference points” (note: one of these ear reference points may not physically exist on a split head model) for approximate 2-3 cm. While it is in this position, the device handset is tilted away from the mouth with respect to the “test device reference point” until the inside angle between the vertical centerline on the front surface of the phone and the horizontal line passing through the ear reference point is by 15°. After the tilt, it is then moved (translated) back toward the head perpendicular to the line passes through both “ear reference points” until the device touches the phantom or the ear spacer. If the antenna touches the head first, the positioning process should be repeated with a tilt angle less than 15° so that the device and its antenna would touch the phantom simultaneously. This test position may require a device holder or positioner to achieve the translation and tilting with acceptable positioning repeatability. SAR Evaluation Report 29 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 If a device is also designed to transmit with its keypad cover closed for operating in the head position, such positions should also be considered in the SAR evaluation. The device should be tested on the left and right side of the head phantom in the “Cheek/Touch” and “Ear/Tilt” positions. When applicable, each configuration should be tested with the antenna in its fully extended and fully retracted positions. These test configurations should be tested at the high, middle and low frequency channels of each operating mode; for example, AMPS, CDMA, and TDMA. If the SAR measured at the middle channel for each test configuration (left, right, Cheek/Touch, Tile/Ear, extended and retracted) is at least 2.0 dB lower than the SAR limit, testing at the high and low channels is optional for such test configuration(s). If the transmission band of the test device is less than 10 MHz, testing at the high and low frequency channels is optional. Ear /Tilt 15o Position Test positions for body-worn and other configurations Body-worn operating configurations should be tested with the belt-clips and holsters attached to the device and positioned against a flat phantom in normal use configurations. Devices with a headset output should be tested with a headset connected to the device. When multiple accessories that do not contain metallic components are supplied with the device, the device may be tested with only the accessory that dictates the closest spacing to the body. When multiple accessories that contain metallic components are supplied with the device, the device must be tested with each accessory that contains a unique metallic component. If multiple accessories share an identical metallic component (e.g., the same metallic belt-clip used with different holsters with no other metallic components), only the accessory that dictates the closest spacing to the body must be tested. Body-worn accessories may not always be supplied or available as options for some devices that are intended to be authorized for body-worn use. A separation distance of 1.5 cm between the back of the device and a flat phantom is recommended for testing body-worn SAR compliance under such circumstances. Other separation distances may be used, but they should not exceed 2.5 cm. In these cases, the device may use body-worn accessories that provide a separation distance greater than that tested for the device provided however that the accessory contains no metallic components. SAR Evaluation Report 30 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR Evaluation Procedure The evaluation was performed with the following procedure: Step 1: Measurement of the SAR value at a fixed location above the ear point or central position was used as a reference value for assessing the power drop. The SAR at this point is measured at the start of the test and then again at the end of the testing. Step 2: The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head was measured at a distance of 4 mm from the inner surface of the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the head or EUT and the horizontal grid spacing was 10 mm x 10 mm. Based on these data, the area of the maximum absorption was determined by spline interpolation. The first Area Scan covers the entire dimension of the EUT to ensure that the hotspot was correctly identified. Step 3: Around this point, a volume of 35 mm x 35 mm x 35 mm was assessed by measuring 7x 7 x 7 points. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated under the following procedure: 1) The data at the surface were extrapolated, since the center of the dipoles is 1.2 mm away from the tip of the probe and the distance between the surface and the lowest measuring point is 1.3 mm. The extrapolation was based on a least square algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in z-axes. This polynomial was then used to evaluate the points between the surface and the probe tip. 2) The maximum interpolated value was searched with a straightforward algorithm. Around this maximum the SAR values averaged over the spatial volumes (1 g or 10 g) were computed by the 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-Spline is composed of three one dimensional splines with the “Not a knot"-condition (in x, y and z-directions). The volume was integrated with the trapezoidal-algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were interpolated to calculate the averages. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was found. Step 4: Re-measurement of the SAR value at the same location as in Step 1. If the value changed by more than 5%, the evaluation was repeated. Test methodology EN50360: 2001+A1:2012 EN62209-1:2006 EN62209-2:2010 EN 62479:2010 IEEE1528:2013 SAR Evaluation Report 31 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 CONDUCTED OUTPUT POWER MEASUREMENT Provision Applicable The measured peak output power should be greater and within 5% than EMI measurement. Test Procedure The RF output of the transmitter was connected to the input of the EMI Receiver through sufficient attenuation. EMI Receiver Combiner EUT Rohde & Schwarz CMU200 Wireless Communication Test Set GSM&3G Test Results: GSM Conducted Output Power Frequency Band GSM900 DCS1800 (MHz) (dBm) (W) 880.2 32.30 1.698 902.0 32.40 1.738 914.8 32.50 1.778 1710.2 29.60 0.912 1747.8 29.00 0.794 1784.8 28.10 0.646 GPRS Mode GSM900 DCS1800 RF Output Power (dBm) Channel No. Frequency (MHz) 1 slot 2 slots 3 slots 4 slots 975 880.2 32.36 30.73 29.09 27.93 60 902.0 31.34 30.68 29.11 27.95 124 914.8 31.39 30.72 29.20 28.00 512 1710.2 29.62 28.83 27.07 25.92 700 1747.8 28.99 28.29 26.62 25.46 885 1784.8 28.24 27.51 26.31 25.13 SAR Evaluation Report 32 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 For SAR, the time based average power is relevant, the difference in between depends on the duty cycle of the TDMA signal. Number of Time slot 1 2 3 4 Duty Cycle 1:8 1:4 1:2.66 1:2 Time based Ave. power compared to slotted Ave. power -9 dB -6 dB -4.25 dB -3 dB Crest Factor 8 4 2.66 2 The time based average power for GPRS Band Time based average Power (dBm) Channel No. Frequency (MHz) 1 slot 2 slots 3 slots 4 slots 975 880.2 23.36 24.73 24.84 24.93 60 902.0 22.34 24.68 24.86 24.95 124 914.8 22.39 24.72 24.95 25.00 512 1710.2 20.62 22.83 22.82 22.92 700 1747.8 19.99 22.29 22.37 22.46 885 1784.8 19.24 21.51 22.06 22.13 GSM900 DCS1800 Note: 1. Rohde & Schwarz Radio Communication Tester (CMU200) was used for the measurement of GSM peak and average output power for active timeslots. 2. For GSM voice, 1 timeslot has been activated with power level 5 (900 MHz band) and 0 (1800 MHz band). 3. For GPRS, 1, 2, 3 and 4 timeslots has been activated separately with power control level 3(900 MHz band) and 3(1800 MHz band). WCDMA900 Averaged Mean Power (dBm) Test Condition Test Mode 3GPP Sub Test Low Frequency Mid Frequency High Frequency Normal Rel 99 - 22.27 22.70 22.75 Test Condition Test Mode 3GPP Sub Test Low Frequency Mid Frequency High Frequency Normal Rel 99 - 22.28 22.26 22.19 WCDMA2100 Averaged Mean Power (dBm) Note: The default test configuration is to measure SAR with an established radio link between the EUT and a communication test set using a 12.2 kbps RMC (reference measurement Channel) Configured in Test Loop Model 1. SAR Evaluation Report 33 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Bluetooth: Mode BDR(GFSK) EDR(4-DQPSK) EDR-8DPSK BLE Channel Frequency (MHz) Power (dBm) Power (mw) 2402 1.84 1.528 2441 2.86 1.932 2480 3.21 2.094 2402 0.49 1.119 2441 2.01 1.589 2480 2.50 1.778 2402 0.85 1.216 2441 1.99 1.581 2480 2.48 1.770 2402 -6.11 0.245 2440 -5.02 0.315 2480 -4.42 0.361 Wi-Fi Band 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n-HT20 802.11n-HT40 Conducted Output Power Frequency (MHz) (dBm) (mW) 2412 12.40 17.378 2442 12.60 18.197 2472 12.30 16.982 2412 11.03 12.677 2442 11.65 14.622 2472 11.41 13.836 2412 9.66 9.247 2442 9.78 9.506 2472 9.53 8.974 2422 8.46 7.015 2442 8.26 6.699 2462 8.89 7.745 Note: 1. The output power was tested under data rate 1Mbps for 802.11b, 6Mbps for 802.11g, 6.5Mbps for 802.11n-HT20 and 13.5Mbps for 802.11n-HT40. 2. EN62479-SAR is not required for low-power equipment where the available antenna power and/or the average total radiated power is less than or equal to the Pmax values given in Annex A (20 mW). SAR Evaluation Report 34 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR MEASUREMENT RESULTS This page summarizes the results of the performed dosimetric evaluation. Test Results: Environmental Conditions: Temperature: 21 ℃ Relative Humidity: 52 ATM Pressure: 1002 mbar * Testing was performed by Wilson Chen on 2015-01-20 EGSM 900: EUT Position Left-Head-Cheek Left-Head-Tilt Right-Head-Cheek Right -Head-Tilt Body-Headset-Back (15mm) Body-Back (15mm) SAR Evaluation Report Frequency (MHz) Test Mode Antenna Phantom Type Type 880.2 902.0 914.8 880.2 902.0 914.8 880.2 902.0 914.8 880.2 902.0 914.8 880.2 902.0 914.8 880.2 902.0 914.8 GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GPRS GPRS GPRS Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM Universal Universal Universal Universal Universal Universal Power CE 10g SAR (W/Kg) Drift Measurement Limit Plot () / / 2.0 / 1.826 0.376 2.0 / / / 2.0 / / / 2.0 / 0.945 0.223 2.0 / / / 2.0 / -2.163 0.359 2.0 / -3.177 0.402 2.0 1# 1.296 0.384 2.0 / / / 2.0 / -2.401 0.210 2.0 / / / 2.0 / / / 2.0 / -1.490 0.369 2.0 / / / 2.0 / / 2.188 0.582 2.0 -0.909 0.609 2.0 / -1.115 0.613 2.0 2# 35 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 DCS 1800: EUT Position Left-Head-Cheek Left-Head-Tilt Right-Head-Cheek Right -Head-Tilt Body-Headset-Back (15mm) Body-Back (15mm) Frequency (MHz) Test Mode Antenna Phantom Type Type 1710.2 1747.8 1784.8 1710.2 1747.8 1784.8 1710.2 1747.8 1784.8 1710.2 1747.8 1784.8 1747.8 1784.8 1710.2 1747.8 1784.8 1710.2 GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GSM GPRS GPRS GPRS Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral Integral SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM SAM Universal Universal Universal Universal Universal Universal Power CE 10g SAR (W/Kg) Drift Measurement Limit Plot () -1.127 0.124 2.0 / -2.406 0.143 2.0 3# -0.429 0.122 2.0 / / / 2.0 / 1.263 0.059 2.0 / / / 2.0 / / / / 2.0 -2.826 0.139 2.0 / / 2.0 / / / 2.0 / -0.882 0.055 2.0 / / / 2.0 / / / 2.0 / 1.278 0.166 2.0 / / / 2.0 / 2.007 0.325 2.0 4# -1.785 0.283 2.0 / 0.296 0.308 2.0 / Note: 1. When the 10-g SAR is ≤ 1.0W/Kg, testing for low and high channel is optional. 2. The EUT is a Class B mobile phone which can be attached to both GPRS and GSM services, using one service at a time. 3. The Multi-slot Classes of EUT is Class 12which has maximum 4 Downlink slots and 4 Uplink slots, the maximum active slots is 5, when perform the multiple slots scan, 1DL+4UL is the worst case. 4. The EUT transmit and receive through the same GSM antenna while testing SAR. SAR Evaluation Report 36 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 WCDMA 900 EUT Position Left-Head-Cheek Left-Head-Tilt Right-Head-Cheek Right -Head-Tilt Body- Back (15mm) Frequency (MHz) 882.4 897.6 912.6 882.4 897.6 912.6 882.4 897.6 912.6 882.4 897.6 912.6 882.4 897.6 912.6 Power CE 10g SAR (W/Kg) Drift () Measurement Limit Plot WCDMA900 Integral SAM -2.105 0.168 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM -1.727 0.182 2.0 5# WCDMA900 Integral SAM -3.439 0.171 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM -2.145 0.083 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM -0.825 0.176 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM -1.829 0.098 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral Universal 0.539 0.244 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral Universal 1.044 0.252 2.0 / WCDMA900 Integral Universal 2.267 0.269 2.0 6# Test Mode Antenna Phantom Type Type WCDMA 2100 EUT Position Left-Head-Cheek Left-Head-Tilt Right-Head-Cheek Right -Head-Tilt Body- Back (15mm) Frequency (MHz) 1922.4 1950.0 1977.6 1922.4 1950.0 1977.6 1922.4 1950.0 1977.6 1922.4 1950.0 1977.6 1922.4 1950.0 1977.6 Power CE 10g SAR (W/Kg) Drift () Measurement Limit Plot WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM 1.716 0.099 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM 0.839 0.048 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / 7# WCDMA2100 Integral SAM -2.323 0.103 2.0 WCDMA2100 Integral SAM -1.375 0.096 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM -2.900 0.101 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM 2.626 0.045 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral SAM / / 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral Universal 1.436 0.284 2.0 8# WCDMA2100 Integral Universal -2.070 0.258 2.0 / WCDMA2100 Integral Universal -1.343 0.262 2.0 / Test Mode Antenna Phantom Type Type Note: 1. When the 10-g SAR is ≤ 1.0W/Kg, testing for low and high channel is optional. 2. The default test configuration is to measure SAR with an established radio link between the EUT and a communication test set using a 12.2 kbps RMC (reference measurement Channel) Configured in Test Loop Mode. SAR Evaluation Report 37 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 SAR Plots (Summary of the Highest SAR Values) Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) Right -Head-Cheek (902.0 MHz Middle Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : GSM :8 : Complete : 11x8x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.033 W/kg : 0.032 W/kg : -3.177 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 902.0 MHz : 41.46 F/m : 0.99 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 900 :8 :6 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.563 W/kg : 0.402 W/kg : 0.580 W/kg : 0.875 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 1# SAR Evaluation Report 38 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) Body-worn Back (914.8 MHz High Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : GPRS :2 : Complete : 8x11x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.761 W/kg : 0.753 W/kg : -1.115 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 914.8 MHz : 41.28 F/m : 1.00 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 900 :2 :6 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.850 W/kg : 0.613 W/kg : 0.852 W/kg : 1.366 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 2# SAR Evaluation Report 39 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) Left-Head-Cheek (1747.8 MHz Middle Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : GSM :8 : Complete : 8x11x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.003 W/kg : 0.003 W/kg : -2.406 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 1747.8 MHz : 39.55 F/m : 1.41 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 1750 :8 : 5.4 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.242 W/kg : 0.143 W/kg : 0.270 W/kg : 0.408 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 3# SAR Evaluation Report 40 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) Body-worn-Back (1710.2 MHz Low Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : GPRS :2 : Complete : 8x11x1 : Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7 : Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.305 W/kg : 0.311 W/kg : 2.007 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 1710.2 MHz : 39.37 F/m : 1.37 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 1750 :4 : 5.4 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.617 W/kg : 0.325 W/kg : 0.622 W/kg : 0.970 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 4# SAR Evaluation Report 41 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) WCDMA900; Left-Head-Cheek (897.6 MHz Middle Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : WCDMA900 :1 : Complete : 8x11x1: Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7: Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.009 W/kg : 0.009 W/kg :-1.727 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 897.6 MHz : 41.25 F/m : 0.99 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 900 :1 :6 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.273 W/kg : 0.182 W/kg : 0.291 W/kg : 0.455 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 5# SAR Evaluation Report 42 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) WCDMA900; Body-worn Back-Headset (912.6 MHz High Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : WCDMA900 :1 : Complete : 8x11x1: Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7: Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.352 W/kg : 0.344 W/kg : 2.267 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 912.6 MHz : 41.36 F/m : 1.00 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 900 :1 :6 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.349 W/kg : 0.269 W/kg : 0.360 W/kg : 0.548 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 6# SAR Evaluation Report 43 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) WCDMA2100; Right Head Cheek (1922.4 MHz Low Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : WCDMA2100 :1 : Complete : 8x11x1: Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7: Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.002 W/kg : 0.002 W/kg :-2.323 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 1922.4 MHz : 40.01 F/m : 1.35 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 1900 :1 : 4.8 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.192 W/kg : 0.103 W/kg : 0.210 W/kg : 0.305 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 7# SAR Evaluation Report 44 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Test Laboratory: Bay Area Compliance Lab Corp. (Shenzhen) WCDMA2100; Body-worn-Back (1922.4 MHz Low Channel) Measurement Data Test mode Crest Factor Scan Type Area Scan Zoom Scan Power Drift-Start Power Drift-Finish Power Drift (%) : WCDMA2100 :1 : Complete : 8x11x1: Measurement x=10mm, y=10mm, z=4mm : 7x7x7: Measurement x=5mm, y=5mm, z=5mm : 0.210 W/kg : 0.213 W/kg : 1.436 Tissue Data Type Frequency Epsilon Sigma Density : Head and Body : 1922.4 MHz : 40.01 F/m : 1.35 S/m : 1000.00 kg/cu. m Probe Data Serial No. Frequency Band Duty Cycle Factor Conversion Factor Probe Sensitivity Compression Point Offset : 500-00283 : 1900 :1 : 4.8 : 1.20 1.20 1.20 : 95.00 mV : 1.56 mm 1 gram SAR value 10 gram SAR value Area Scan Peak SAR Zoom Scan Peak SAR : 0.402 W/kg : 0.284 W/kg : 0.414 W/kg : 0.610 W/kg µV/(V/m)2 Plot 8# SAR Evaluation Report 45 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX A MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY The uncertainty budget has been determined for the measurement system and is given in the following Table. Measurement Uncertainty for 300MHz to 3GHz Source of Uncertainty Tolerance Value Probability Distribution Divisor c i1 (1-g) c i1 (10-g) Standard Uncertainty (1-g) % Standard Uncertainty (10-g) % 1 1 (1-cp)1 3.5 3.5 /2 1.5 1.5 Measurement System Probe Calibration 3.5 normal 1 Axial Isotropy 3.7 rectangular 3 (1-cp)1/2 Hemispherical Isotropy Boundary Effect 10.9 1.0 rectangular rectangular 3 3 √cp 1 √cp 1 4.4 0.6 4.4 0.6 Linearity 4.7 rectangular 3 1 1 2.7 2.7 Detection Limit 1.0 rectangular 3 1 1 0.6 0.6 Readout Electronics 1.0 normal 1 1 1 1.0 1.0 Response Time 0.8 rectangular 3 1 1 0.5 0.5 Integration Time RF Ambient Condition -Noise RF Ambient Condition Reflections Probe Positioner Mech. Restrictions 1.7 rectangular 3 1 1 1.0 1.0 0.6 rectangular 3 1 1 0.3 0.3 3.0 rectangular 3 1 1 1.7 1.7 0.4 rectangular 3 1 1 0.2 0.2 Restriction Probe Positioning with respect to Phantom Shell 2.9 rectangular 3 1 1 1.7 1.7 Extrapolation and Integration 3.7 rectangular 3 1 1 2.1 2.1 2.3 normal 1 1 1 2.3 2.3 6.215 normal 1 1 1 6.215 6.215 4.627 rectangular 3 1 1 2.67 2.67 Test Sample Positioning Device Holder Uncertainty Drift of Output Power Phantom and Setup Phantom Uncertainty(shape & thickness tolerance) Liquid Conductivity(target) Liquid Conductivity(meas.) Liquid Permittivity(target) Liquid Permittivity(meas.) Combined Uncertainty Expanded uncertainty (coverage factor=2) SAR Evaluation Report 3.4 rectangular 3 1 1 2.0 2.0 5.0 rectangular 3 0.7 0.5 2.0 1.4 1.938 normal 1 0.7 0.5 1.36 0.97 5.0 rectangular 3 0.6 0.5 1.7 1.4 3.093 normal 1 0.6 0.5 1.86 1.55 RSS 10.78 10.55 Normal(k=2) 21.56 21.10 46 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX B PROBE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES SAR Evaluation Report 47 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 48 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 49 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 50 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 51 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 52 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 53 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 54 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 55 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 56 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX C DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES SAR Evaluation Report 57 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 58 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 59 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 60 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 61 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 62 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 63 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 64 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 65 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 66 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 67 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 68 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 69 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 70 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 71 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 72 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 73 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 74 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 75 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 76 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 77 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 78 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 79 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 80 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 81 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 82 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) SAR Evaluation Report Report No: RDG150116005-20 83 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX D EUT TEST POSITION PHOTOS Liquid depth ≥ 15cm Body-worn Back Setup Photo 15mm SAR Evaluation Report 84 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Left Head Cheek Setup Photo Left Head Tilt Setup Photo SAR Evaluation Report 85 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 Right Head Cheek Setup Photo Right Head Tilt Setup Photo SAR Evaluation Report 86 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX E EUT PHOTOS EUT – Front View EUT – Back View SAR Evaluation Report 87 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EUT – Left Side View EUT – Right Side View SAR Evaluation Report 88 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EUT – Top View EUT – Bottom View SAR Evaluation Report 89 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 EUT – Uncovered View GSM&3G Antenna Location SAR Evaluation Report 90 of 91 Bay Area Compliance Laboratories Corp. (Shenzhen) Report No: RDG150116005-20 APPENDIX F INFORMATIVE REFERENCES [1] Federal Communications Commission, \Report and order: Guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of radiofrequency radiation", Tech. Rep. FCC 96-326, FCC, Washington, D.C. 20554, 1996. [2] David L. Means Kwok Chan, Robert F. Cleveland, \Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields", Tech. Rep., Federal Communication Commission, O_ce of Engineering & Technology, Washington, DC, 1997. [3] Thomas Schmid, Oliver Egger, and Niels Kuster, \Automated E-_eld scanning system for dosimetric assessments", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, pp. 105{113, Jan. 1996. [4] Niels Kuster, Ralph K.astle, and Thomas Schmid, \Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision", IEICE Transactions on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, pp. 645{652, May 1997. [5] CENELEC, \Considerations for evaluating of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile telecommunication equipment (MTE) in the frequency range 30MHz - 6GHz", Tech. Rep., CENELEC, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization, Brussels, 1997. [6] ANSI, ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, NY 10017, 1992. [7] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at mobile communications frequencies", in ICECOM _ 97, Dubrovnik, October 15{17, 1997, pp. 120-24. [8] Katja Pokovic, Thomas Schmid, and Niels Kuster, \E-field probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids", in Proceedings of the ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, 23{25 June, 1996, pp. 172-175. [9] Volker Hombach, Klaus Meier, Michael Burkhardt, Eberhard K. uhn, and Niels Kuster, \The depen-dence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1865-1873, Oct. 1996. [10] Klaus Meier, Ralf Kastle, Volker Hombach, Roger Tay, and Niels Kuster, \The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 1800 MHz", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Oct. 1997, in press. [11] W. Gander, Computermathematik, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992. [12] W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky,W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recepies in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 9 [13] NIS81 NAMAS, \The treatment of uncertainity in EMC measurement", Tech. Rep., NAMAS Executive, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, England, 1994. [14] Barry N. Taylor and Christ E. Kuyatt, \Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results", Tech. Rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994. Dosimetric Evaluation of Sample device, month 1998 10. ***** END OF REPORT ***** SAR Evaluation Report 91 of 91