INDUSTRIAL ATTACHMENT PROGRAM FOLLOW-UP WORKSHOP REPORT. Kigali, August 2013 I. INTRODUCTION An Industrial attachment program (IAP) is a training program whereby students/graduates are placed in companies/industries to acquire practical hands on skills through on the job training under the mentorship of a company supervisor with vast experience in that area. IAPs are delivered by TVET training providers, such as VTCs, TSSs and IPRCs as part of their training curriculum. These training providers, however, have conducted IAPs using different approaches. For the purpose of uniformity and harmonization, WDA in collaboration with JICA, developed a standardized IAP guideline, which was validated in a workshop which took place at Hilltop hotel on 17th of January 2012, with the presence of all stakeholders including the private sector. Subsequently, IAP dissemination workshops for TVET schools were conducted from 7th to 11th May 2012 in Musanze and from 28th May to 1st June 2012 in Kigali. This time, one year after the workshop, WDA in partnership with JICA-TCT project phase 2 conducted IAP follow-up survey from 27thMay to 6th June 2013 in order to collect information of the current situation of IAP, understand the obstacles and good practices of IAP in implementation, and examine the effectiveness of the IAP guideline as well as the IAP workshop conducted last year. To conclude the IAP follow-up survey, WDA and JICA-TCT project phase 2 have carried out a two-day workshop from 1st to 2nd August 2013 to share the findings of the survey, and to examine how WDA, together with TVET schools and industry partners, can better promote and improve the IAP practices on the ground. II. IAP-FU Workshop Preparation Steps Various consultative meetings to review the previous trainings, collect all the visit reports and analyze the results, Arrangement for the experience-sharing presentations ,Case study preparation, Review of the previous WS presentation , Invitations and final preparations have been conducted based on the pre established schedule below ● Main in charge, take initiative ○ Tentative Deadline i) Second in charge ᇞ Give inputs & support d Activities WDA TCT JICA ● ● ● Review of previous training and consider the workshop program (1 meeting) Done ・Review of previous training and consider the workshop program ii) Make visits to some institutions where it seems to have good practices. (within May). Done ・Selection of institutions to be visited and appointments ● Done ・Prepare general/ standardized questions, regarding IAP implementation ● ○ ● ● ᇞ ● ● ᇞ ● ● ○ ● Done Done 24-Jun July ・Appoint people who will visit selected institutions and decide source of transport means ・Visit schools and conduct the survey (verval interview & collection of questionnaire) Responsible person makes a report of the visit ・Collect all the visit reports and analyze the results (& identify the schools which will share their experience at the WS) ・A summary report of the school visit/survey findings should be made before the workshop ● ● iii) Preparation 1: Arrangement for the experience-sharing presentations Done ・identify the schools which will share their experience at the WS ● 24-Jun ・make a “skeleton” or “content list” of the presentation ● 26-Jun end June 5-Jul ・prepare and send out request letters to the selected schools together with a “skeleton” or “content list” ● ● ● ・progress check ● ● ・collect presentation data ● ● iii) Preparation 2: Arrangement of the Venue 24-Jun ᇞ ・Decide the date and venue. Book a place. ● iv) Preparation 3: Case study preparation 1-Jul ・Prepare “Made-up case study” 1 ○ ᇞ ● 17-Jul ・Prepare “Made-up case study” 2 ○ ᇞ ● ● ᇞ ○ ● ● v) Preparation 4: Review of the previous WS presentation 28-Jun ・Prepare “Review of the previous WS" presentation vi) Preparation 5: Invitations and final preparations 15-Jul ・Send invitation letters to the schools (2 weeks before the workshop) ● 22-Jul ・Final meeting before the FUWS. Confirm and clarify doubts ● 25-Jul ・Confirmation of participation (1 week before, for almost final check) ● 29-Jul ・print and prepare all the handouts and if any, guidelines. ● ● ● vii) Conduct IAP-FU workshop 31-Jul ・Preparation check ● 1&2Aug ・Conduct the WS (chaired by WDA, with facilitation support of JICA) ● ● ● ● ● ● viii) Review 5-Aug ・Review meeting and think of action plan for improvement III. IAP FOLLOW UP WORKSHOP The workshop was conducted to examine how WDA, together with TVET schools and industry partners, can better promote and improve the IAP practices with the following specific objectives: to share information on the current situation of IAP, to understand the obstacles and good practices of IAP in practice, to examine the effectiveness of the IAP guideline as well as the IAP workshops conducted last year, to suggest the best strategies to bring private companies on board to support IAP and to understand different roles/responsibilities to be taken by different stakeholders, i.e. TVET schools, private companies, and WDA, for better IAP implementation At the end of the workshop expected results were: Sort out good practices and challenges of IAP, share ideas with companies so as to minimize the gap on expectation for IAP, examine possible solutions to overcome IAP challenges, learn how to conduct proper monitoring and assessment and understand different roles to be taken by different stakeholders, namely, TVET schools, private companies, and WDA III.1. Agenda of IAP Follow-up Workshop Day1 Time 8:309:00-9:10 9:10-9:25 9:30-10:00 10:00-10:15 10:15- 12:30 15 min + Q&A 5min =20 x 5 institutions & RALO (Rwanda Association of Liaison Officers) 12:30-14:00 14:00-15:00 Agenda Registration Opening Remarks Self-introduction Workshop objective & schedule Review of the previous workshop Industry Relation Activities by TCT Sharing the institutions experience (request selected institutions to prepare PPT, flip chart or handouts before the workshop) <Contents> Summary of IAP 1. Information of the school 2. IAP Operation Structure at the school 3. Information of the 2012 IAP 4. Good Practice 5. Challenges faced 6. Possible solutions to overcome the challenges Lunch Summary of IAP FU Survey - General Findings - Good practices - Challenges in preparation - Challenges in implementation stage - Challenges in Assessment and Review Sort out good practice and challenges into categories Category sample: HR Finance Transport 15:00-16:30 Preparation Implementation Assessment and review 16:30-16:50 Wrap-up 16:50-17:00 Explanation of next day, closing of Day 1 Company cooperation Day2 Agenda Time Registration 8:30- 9:00-12:00 (tea break 15 min) 12:00-13:00 13:30-15:00 15:00-16:00 16:00-16:30 Group work on G/P and Challenges (make 4-6 groups) - Analysis of good practices and challenges (using 5 whys) Success contribution factors Challenges’ root cause Guideline and logbooks usage - Recommendation - Summary, write down on flip chart Lunch Group presentation & discussion - Institutional level improvement strategy - WDA/MINEDUC level improvement strategy Wrap-up& Conclusion Closing III.2. Review of the previous workshop For the purpose of updating all participants on the implementation of the harmonized industrial attachment program, it was necessary to draw the history of the new industrial attachment program from the pilot phase to dissemination including respective activities and findings. III.2.1. IAP PILOT PROJECT To enhance competitiveness and employability of the workforce, WDA urged the promotion of industrial attachment program in TVET Schools hence requested JICA to cooperate in a technical aid project .JICA provided an expert who facilitated and guided the development of IAP framework, implemented it in 10 selected VTCs and visited private sector companies, PSF (BDS), RCA and individual cooperatives for seeking cooperation to the program. After a careful evaluation and validation workshop of the program it was decided to replicate / roll out it in the remaining TVET schools. III.2.2. IAP DISSEMINATION WORKSHOPS After implementing the IAP pilot program and its validation by industry in January 2012, WDA through partnership building unit have been implementing the validated program in All TVET schools: 20 industrial liaison officers from 20 schools were trained on a harmonized IAP 212 school managers around the country were trained 187 company supervisors were trained IAP guideline was developed during the workshop III.2.2.1. Major Activities implemented Visit 6 Schools supported by SDP and discuss IAP with school Managers Different Workshops within the schools where students, instructors and Los were trained Visit cooperatives and request for IAP cooperation IAP was discussed during TVET EXPO 2012 Visit private sector companies Contact with PSF (BDS) Delivery of IAP log books & framework through IPRCs to all schools Over 400 companies gave attachment to students from the above 20 schools 18,600 log books were distributed to all TVET Institutions through IPRCs 600 IAP Framework were distributed to all TVET Institutions for clear IAP guidance III.3. Industry relation activities by Tumba College of Technology (TCT) Industry relation activities of TCT consist in three areas: Interface, joint capacity building and students career support III.3.1.Interface A) Technical Advisory Group (TAG) To identify need in the industry To keep up the curriculum relevant to the industrial needs To establish network ties between the stakeholders and the school B) Alumni Association Promotion of unity among TCT graduates Strengthen the link among graduates in industries and TCT Lead to positive impacts to students’ employment C) Public Relations Exposure through various media channels of major school events and technological achievements to attract the industries’ attention. Establishment of an office particularly in charge of relation with industries (ORI) III.3.2. Joint Capacity Building A) Income Generation Sign MoUs with industries Work together on projects that generate income Build capacity through those projects Reflect in class B) Technology Demonstration Organize showcases of technologies under development - Solar water heater - Biomass - Improved cooking stoves - Factory automation system - Mobile Apps, etc.. Invite industries to participate and give they views Incorporate the views and come up with final versions Invite industries for a seminar on technologies newly developed Sign MoUs with industries for production, sales, distribution, etc.. III.3.3. Students Career Support IA Support Employment Support Entrepreneurship Support Tracer Survey Incubation Center IV. SHARING THE INSTITUTIONS EXPERIENCE The invitees were Industrial Liaison officers and deputy school managers/vice principals in charge of trainings from 23 TVET institutions. Six TVET institutions were selected to make power point presentation to share the institutions experience but only 5 institutions were able to share their experiences: TCT, IPRC Kigali, Gatenga VTC, Gisenyi VTC and NMEC who presented about Rwanda Association for Liaison Officers (RALO) on the following aspects: Information of the school IAP Operation Structure at the school Information of the 2012 IAP Good Practice Challenges faced, Solutions to overcome challenges. After power point presentations from selected institutions, the participants shared views on the general findings, good practices, challenges in the preparation, in implementation stage and in assessment and review. V. INDUSTRIAL ATTACHMENT PROGRAM FOLLOW UP SURVEY A well implemented industrial attachment allows TVET students to acquire appropriate knowledge and skills through real practical experience. For a better and harmonized IAP implementation in TVET sector, the government of Rwanda through WDA in collaboration with JICA organized two sessions of IAP workshops from 7th to 11th May 2012 in Musanze and from 28th May to 1st June 2012 in Kigali. During the workshops, the IAP Guideline and some tools were introduced and distributed to participants to help in IAP implementation. IV.1. Objectives of the survey Collect information of the current situation of IAP Understand the obstacles and good practices of IAP in practice Examine the effectiveness of the IAP guideline Examine the effectiveness of the IAP WS conducted last year WDA understands what improvements can be made for better IAP practice IV.2. Agenda and the schedule of the survey N o NAME OF KIND THE OF SCHOOL SCHO OL DISTRIC T PROVI NCE CONTACT PERSON 1 GATENGA VTC GACURIRO VTC NEW HOPE INSTITUTE UMUSHUMB AMWIZA VTC IPRC KIGALI VTC KICUKIR O GASABO KIGALI CITY KIGALI CITY KIGALI CITY KIGALI CITY AKILAH INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN INSTI TUTE KIGALI CITY KIGALI CITY MURINDAHABI Diogene NYAGAHIMA Julian 0788463186 6 KICUKIR O GASABO 0786545581 yes yes yes 7 KIBALI VTC(CFJ Kibali) TCT VTC GICUMBI NORTH RUZINDANA Eugene 0788589349 yes yes yes RULINDO NORTH GATABAZI Pascal 0788300375 NYANZA SOUTH RUDAHUNGA Gedeon 0788300215 yes yes yes RUHANG O NYANZA BUGESER A KAYONZ A KAYONZ A KIREHE RUBAVU RUSIZI SOUTH NDANGAMIRA Gilbert MUDUMIRO Simon NGABONZIZA P. Celestin BIDERI John Bonds 0788508074 yes yes yes 0788617619 0788554008 yes yes yes yes yes Yes 0788304184 yes yes Yes 0788662593 yes yes yes yes yes yes Yes Yes Yes WEST 0782115399 0788846016 07 88782444 0783709491 yes yes yes NYAMAS HEKE MUKAKAGWENE Alphonsine MURERA Celestin TUYISENGE Evariste NYIRANGIRIMAN A Noella NZABAGURIRA Fabien no No Yes 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 VTC VTC VTC IPRC COLL EGE IPRC- SOUTH VTC (KAVUMU Campus) MPANDA VTC VTC NYANZA VTC VTC NMEC VTC VTC VTC 15 16 17 AMIZERO VTC KABARONDO VTC KIREHE VTC GISENYI VTC SABANA VTC 18 TYAZO VTC VTC 14 VTC VTC VTC VTC NYARUG ENGE GASABO SOUTH EAST EAST EAST EAST WEST WEST TELEPHO NE Guide line distrib uted IAP neces sary forms distri butes FATHER DANKO Liti 0788435034 yes yes Parti cipat ed last IAP work shop yes NIYITEGEKA Gad 0788870317 yes yes yes ABANDIBAKOBWA 0788931667 Jacqueline SOEUR MARIE CHRI 0784163295 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes IV.2. General Findings Out of 18 visited schools: 15 Schools have assigned ILOs 16 schools conducted IAP after 2012 IAP WS 15 of IAP responsible have experience Average year of experience for all IAP responsible is 2.1 years IV.2.1 FIVE (5) YEARS IAP GENERAL EXPERIENCE Academic year Number of schools Number of students Number of attachments and unattachments Percentage Attached students Unattached students Attached students Unattached students 2008 7 1586 1,512 74 95.33% 4.66% 2009 11 2063 2,031 32 98.44% 1.55% 2010 14 2050 2,025 25 98.78% 1.21% 2011 14 2732 2,449 283 89.64% 10.35% 2012 18 3072 2,661 411 86.62% 13.37% According the results, number of schools conducting IAP is increasing as well as the number of students going fort IAP is increasing but the number of attachment is decreasing IV.2.2. ATTACHMENT SITUATION OF 2012 IV.2.3. AREAS THAT HAVE PARTICULAR PROBLEMS Interns of tailoring are restricted to touch any customers’ product Sex harassment for hotels interns Out of 17 visited schools, 11 of them had a problem of companies charging money for IAP. For 7 schools of them students will pay for themselves. 4 schools pay the cost on behalf of students. 6 schools did not have such problem. Number of schools 17 Tot nbr of students 2951 Combined male and female Attac Unatt 2584 = 87.5% 367 = 12.6% Male Female Nmbr Attach Unatt 1790 1479 = 82.62% 311 = 17.37% Nubr. Attach. Unatt 1161 1105 =95.17% 56 = 4.82 IV.2.4. OBSTACLES TO THE EFFECTIVENESS IAP IMPLEMENTATION Insufficient budget Limited number of companies Lack of companies particularly for plumbing, welding and carpentry Problem of undermining VTC graduates to favor those from universities Charging IAP Lack of allowance for trainees Limited financial resources to facilitate ILO in supervision School managers who do not recognize the importance of ILOs Difficulties to find attachment for electrical department Schools having IAP in the same time create a high demand in companies to provide IAP and thus it reduce the chance to get attachment places IAP Guideline seems to be not well understood by users (difference of steps) Schools think that all logbooks are complicated to be used and be filled especially time consuming for companies’ supervisors IV.2.5. INSURANCE PROVISION a) Insurance provision: All students had insurance for 14 schools Some of the students had insurance for 3 schools (1,30,40%) b) Insurance problems: c) Limited capacity for students to pay insurance themselves (Comments from 3 schools); d) Particular or individual insurance obliged by some companies IV.2.6. PROBLEMS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED DURING MONITORING Failing to meet student immediate student’s supervisor when monitoring Lack of discipline of trainees/interns Idle student who were not tasked to do things or kept in one place or department Some company supervisors do not support interns Companies supervisors do not like to fill logbooks Lack of enough transport facilities Students who get IAP in far places difficult to monitor Students who are tasked to do thing far different from their training skills Tailoring companies do not allow interns to go real practices. They are afraid that students might damage customers’ items Some of students get job during IAP and do not come back to school to complete their studies Some students mostly girls get sex harassments during IAP Lack of practice in many of companies IV.2.7. GOOD PRACTICE The IAP practice is high from some years ago even before IAP training and with high attachment For 11 schools ILO’s responsibilities are shared Some of schools developed necessary missing IAP forms Though there is a limited number of companies/industries schools do their best to attach the big number of students IAP guideline is used and useful to11 schools which is 61.1% Students’ logbook is useful and used by 9 schools. Three others users recommended to improve it ILO logbook is useful and used by 9 schools. Two schools think that it needs to be improved Companies' supervisors Logbooks are used in 6 schools. 5 schools think that it need to be revised VI. GROUP WORK ON GOOD PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES The participants were divided into six group discussions to analyse good practice, challenges and effectiveness of TVET through IAP Public awareness, company’s cooperation to IAP and student allocation, IAP financing and Insurance, more effective of IAP, logbook and IAP guidelines. The findings are stated below: V.1. LOGBOOKS i) ii) PROBLEMS/POINTS TO BE IMPROVED Lack of enough pages Duplication of some information Numbering disorganization Spelling mistakes CAUSE OF PROBLEMS LIAISON OFFICER LOGBOOK Logbook pages are not in order Few pages for liaison officer for company visit form STUDENT’S LOGBOOK Indicate phone number of supervisor Mention on page 2 the title: Week No…. Date, from….to….and make ten similar copies On page 5, the first column is a repetition of page 3. It should be removed. The space for comments and suggestions is too small Lack of instructions on how to use logbook and how IAP is conducted Lack of hard cover for log books COMPANY SUPERVISOR LOG BOOK Contract between company and school should be signed once for all. Lack of enough space to write down objectives Lack of enough space for company and school names Logbook translation is not exact when you compares different languages Space for signature is not enough iii) SOLUTIONS Train concerned persons on how to fill in log books (Company log book) Increase the space for objectives (Company log book) Indicate the number of weeks as heading (Company log book) Avail the log book in Kinyarwanda(Company log book) Insert a table of ten rows at least (Company log book) On page 4, change health to health insurances On Art2, change ID badge to “student ID card” Art3. Change ‘allow one or two visits’ to ‘allow liaison office or other schools delegated member for IAP monitoring’ Delete duplicated ideas and phrases Rearrange numbering Correction of spelling mistakes Replace plastic cover with other good covers Harmonize the translation V.2. IAP GUIDELINE i) PROBLEMS ii) CAUSE OF PROBLEMS iii) Logbook is very big Confirmation letters are not properly used Some steps of the steps are not well understood/clear Lack of understanding the meaning/use of some of the IAP proposed forms Communication skills and English level are low Lack of time Mismatch of calendar for schools’ IAP implementation and private sector places availability SOLUTION Use forms instead of letters. It is suitable for business men (WDA) Simplify the logbooks by making few pages (WDA,s responsibility) Sensitization (WDA,s responsibility) Appoint WDA/IAP representative at district level (WDA,s responsibility) V.3. COMPANIES COPOPERATION TO IAP AND STUDENTS ALLOCATION i) PROBLEMS/POINTS TO BE IMPROVED COMPANIES’ COOPERATION TO IAP Trainees are considered as potential competitors Lack of relationship between companies and training providers Companies do not recognize/get the importance of IAP Doubting skills of VTC/fresh graduates Lack of internal IAP supervisors Trainees are considered as potential competitors STUDENTS ALLOCATION ii) Huge number of student go for IAP in the same time Limited number of companies compared to schools IAP places demand Nature of companies (poor companies with limited equipment, lack of capable human resources etc) Lack of financial means which force students to get attached in wrong places CAUSE OF PROBLEMS COMPANIES’ COOPERATION Lack of collaboration framework between companies and schools Companies are not sensitized on IAP Low school/parent financial capacity Lack of IAP awareness to companies IAP period is the same for all schools which means a huge IAP demand difficult to satisfy by limited number of companies Lack of carrier guidance of students before they go to IAP STUDENTS ALLOCATION iii) IAP calendar is the same for all schools Lack of carrier guidance in students orientation SOLUTION Sensitization to company managers (they should get the real meaning/advantage of IAP). Responsible: WDA Establish a relationship framework and follow up. Responsible: WDA and school managers Involve parents in IAP (saving for IAP). Responsible: Government Funding IAP. Responsible: Government ILO should visit companies before sending students. Responsible: School managers and ILOs RESPONSIBLES: WDA in hands with PSF, Company managers V.4. TVET and IAP PUBLIC AWARENESS i) POINTS TO BE IMPROVED ii) CAUSE OF PROBLEMS iii) Lack of TVET and IAP marketing to the public Activities of TVET are not understood by local government/ establish advocacy policy Lack of awareness for VTC, TSS, IPRC and TVET Lack of communication skills of VTCs graduates Lack of employment for VTC graduates on the market Lack of motivation to companies that receive students Lack of marketing budget for TVET And IAP Lack of IAP and TVET decentralization Public’s bad impression of TVET graduates Lack of equipment and qualified teachers Different background of TVET students (Not completed primary studies, primary level, 9years etc) SOLUTION Set up open days, internal and external marketing. Responsible: WDA, Schools, PSF Organize marketing session with company managers. Responsible: Schools, PSF, WDA Select students from the same background. Responsible: Schools Hire qualified trainers. Responsible: WDA Motivating TVET teachers. Responsible: WDA, MINEDUC Create production units within schools. Responsible: Schools, WDA Sensitize IAP to local government (District and other related partners) V.5. IAP FINANCING AND INSURANCE i) PROBLEMS IAP is cost is high to be supported by schools Difficulties to have medical certificate required by some of companies Some companies request student to bring their own working equipment, which is expensive to most of them Charging caution fees to students before providing IAP placement ii) Companies obliging students to submit physical fitness Individual insurance expensive to students CAUSE OF PROBLEMS Weak sensitization/awareness of IAP to the public poverty to concerned pities iii) SOLUTION SHORT TERM SOLUTION Include parent in IAP process. Responsible: Parent and sponsors Establishing IAP clubs in schools. Responsible: School managers Secure IAP budget LONG TERM SOLUTION TVET financing OTHER SOLUTIONS Use media to advertize IAP Advertise IAP in schools’ parent meetings V.6. IAP EFFECTIVENESS i) PROBLEMS Lack responsibilities management in looking IAP places IAP preparation stage complications Lack of seriousness of some of companies Mismatch of schedule of students to attend IAP IAP calendar unfavorable to VTCs, when all school look IAP places in the same time Lack of harmonization of IAP duration ii) CAUSE OF PROBLEMS Schools looking for IAP places alone Students looking for places Delay IAP implementation preparation Poor follow up of request made Heavy workload of ILO Lack of full ownership by school managers Uncertainty of secured places, since companies change their minds Companies undermining VTC levels Companies obliging expensive insurance iii) Duplication of request (student and school applying in one institution separately) Lack of control for IAP request made by students Difficulties to secure places for all school go for IAP in the same period Some of the schools do not follow IAP guideline prepared by DWA and conduct IAP for 3, 2 or 1.5 Months SOLUTION/RECOMMENDATION School should secure places but let students secure places by themselves Stop giving recommendation letters to students to stop schools request letters duplication. The recommendation letter provided to student is exactly the same letter that the school present when applying for IAP places. Cancelling one that was provided to student will improve the situation Let students prepare IAP application letters by themselves get approval from school before taking it to companies and leave a copy of it to school School managers should fully understand IAP and own its activities Publish the list of attachment at least 2 weeks prior to start IAP ILO should not be a trainer because of heavy workload. Teachers should help when it comes to technical support Enhance relations with industries Award best companies to provide IAP placements One person per school should be responsible to sign IAP requesting letters They should be a flexibility for VTCs to arrange IAP for their suitable calendar To respect and follow IAP provided guideline Responsible should be WDA, MINEDUC and GoR VII. IAP Follow Up WorkShop ASSESSMENT, QUESTIONNAIRES RESULT LAPALISSE August 1st and 2nd, 2013 To assess the smoothness of the workshop, a questionnaire was distributed to the participants so that the future workshops could be improved. NO 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. QUESTION Was the workshop venue (La Palisse) good? Were the workshop dates (1 and 2) suitable for you? Was the facilitation good Was the food satisfactory What is the most impressive session in the Workshop? RATING Very good Good 19 Suitable 12 Not suitab le 3 Good 31 Very good 7. Any other comme nt Is the per diem and accommodation enough? Did you enjoy the workshop? Poor Not very good Poor Not satisfa ctory Poor 17 Very satisfact ory 17 Satisf actory 10 Industry relation (TCT) 20 Schoo l Prese ntatio n 14 3 IAP Survey Result Group Work Group work presentati on 13 11 5 Too much Fair Not enoug h 5 Very much 18 Fair 8 Not very much How much is suitabl e? FRW 37,600 Not at all 25 9 3 6. Not very good 3 Reaso ns Other -Information sharing was made easy -SDF IAP WS should be organized for TSS too Consider the ticked/accommodation for those coming far from Kigali not the same way as near/Kigali residents Getting a high number of TVET graduate is appreciable but the quality should prevail on the quantity, since the quality is still very low. Please think of creating technical schools of excellence in Rwanda to serve as model in EAC Congratulation! The workshop was well organized and participants were willing to exchange ideas as well as experience I appreciated WDA for organizing IAP WS To strengthen the capacity of ILO, they should be regular, supervision, visits to them Make sure to heed our given recommendation We should make the WS simple and shorter so that members do not get tired The WS was well organized The training should happen many times to increase the IAP understanding and share experience There is no any other comments apart from congratulating this IAP WS planners Invite more companies to participate in this kind of workshop Consider to increase the per diem for participants who come far from Kigali. They come earlier and leave later As an ILO the workshop should take place periodically, it is helpful to fulfill my responsibilities I appreciated the way the workshop was prepared and conducted I appreciated the workshop organization, group work and its rich methodology Please implement all of suggestion given in this workshop It’s better to organize more workshop like this IAP pacification was very good *Proposed per diem: 35000, 35000, 37000, 40000, 35000, 37000, 37000, 35000, 50000, and 35000. The average of all is 37600Frw: VIII. Recommendations (way forward) The lessons learnt and suggestions from the workshop will lead to the following activities and will be implemented just after the workshop: Dissemination of IAP in all TVET schools We shall Visit and prepare workshops within at least 100 schools. Revise IAP Tools Distribute revised IAP tools To train ILOs, School managers and company supervisors We shall make IAP impact evaluation ANNEX 1: List of participants INDUSTRIAL LIAISON OFFICERS&DEPUTY SCHOOL MANAGERS IN CHARGE OF TRAINING S/ Name of Schools N 1. AMIZERO VTC Candidates Contacts Email NGARAMBE ELIAS MUTURI Lucy NZABAKIRA Francois MURERANGONDO Petronile 0788452705 0789293388 0788505023 0788312743 rambelias@gmail.com 3. GATENGA VTC NSHIMIYIMANA J. NEPO BYARUHANGA Gratien 0783161956 0788746280 nshimiyimanajnepo@ya hoo.fr 4. GISENYI VTC NIYONZIMA Pacifique TWIZERIMANA Viateur NYIRARUKUNDO Denyse NSHIMIYIMANA Emmanuel 0783254731 0788471418 0728819418 0788784830 nipacifique2@gmail.co m denysebobette@yahoo.f r nshiemma202@yahoo.fr /kibalivtc@gmail.com MUSHIMIYIMANA Rosine MUGEMANYI Servelien 0783242033 0788562186 gilbertn2000@yahoo.fr gilbertn2000@yahoo.fr 7. NEW HOPE VTC UWIMANA Godebertha UWAMALIYA M. Goretti 0788552143 0788525813 ugodberthe@yahoo.fr 8. NYANZA VTC KAMANZI Safari Innocent NSANZABERA Gilbert 0788444798 0726916411 DUSENGUMUREMYI J. Damascene Sr Marie Christine MURERA Celestin DUSABE Augustin MWUMVANEZA Valerien NGAMIJE Anastase GASANA Ritah LISA Martillota CARRIE Ellett 0726369021 0784163295 0782115399 0788521518 0788288898 0788591172 0788500206 0784108834 0787613157 NIYIKORA Brisel MBARUBUKEYE Innocent 0788581091 0788521880 2. GACURIRO VTC 5. KIBALI VTC 6. MPANDA VTC 9. UMUSHUMBA MWIZA VTC 10 . 11 . 12 . KIREHE VTC KABARONDO VTC AKILAH INSTITUTE 13 KIBUNGO TSS . nzabakiraf@yahoo.fr gnsanzabera@yahoo@y ahoo.fr christnyira@yahoo.fr vtckirehe@yahoo.com kabarondovtc@yahoo.fr ritah@akilahinstitute.or g carrie@akilahinstitute.o rg Briniy2007@yahoo.fr ubukeye@yahoo.fr 14 ESTB BUSOGO . HAKIZIMANA J. Damascene NIZEYIMANA Jean de la Paix NSANZIRAZOSE Marcel UWIHAYIMANA Eliphaz MUTANGANA Frederic 0788514849 0783058089 16 IPRC –KIGALI . 17 IPRCSOUTH . (KAVUMU) MURIUKI JORUM MFINANGA Joseph NDAHIMANA Solange KAJYAMBERE Pierre 0788436002 0788534595 0788491089 0788410433 18 TCT . MANIRAGUHA Muhamad ABAYISENGA Emile Narcisse January NKURANGA J. Bosco 0788433282 0788651881 0788434725 0788405355 19 . 20 . 21. MUNYESHEMA Ernest BIZIMANA Servilien BYIRINGIRO Claire NYABYENDA J. Paul NYIRANGIRIMANA Noella MUKESHIMANA Pangras NGABONZIZA P. CELESTIN TWAGIRUMUKIZA Ignace UMUKUNZI Paul 0788352532 0788435925 0788880422 0783420548 0788782444 0788419101 0788554008 0788880585 0788307395 15 KIBUYE TSS . IWAWAIRUSDC TYAZO VTC SABANA VTC 22 NMEC VTC . 23 IPRC South . TOTAL WDA STAFF S/N Candidates 0788871080 0788580568 0788305295 hajedandre@yahoo.com nizeyejd@yahoo.fr mutanganafrederic@yah oo.com jorumpeterson@yahoo.c om Solangemu2002@yahoo .fr abem2002@yahoo.com januarynarcisse@gmail. com nkurangajbosco@yahoo .com cyezaernest@yahoo.fr bservilien@yahoo.fr vtctyazo@gmail.com nijohnpa@gmail.com sabanavtc@yahoo.fr bobongadtre@yahoo.fr Umpaul2000@yahoo.fr 44 PARTICIPANTS Title Contacts Email 45. GASANA Jerome DG 0788308785 jerome@wda.gov.rw 46. MUNEZERO Didier Director partnership 0788303726 didimu80@yahoo.fr 47. HABIMANA Theodore Director TVET Training 0788301057 habitheo@yahoo.fr 48. Dr. MUKURIRA Olivier Quality assurance & accreditat 0783138333 mukulio02@yahoo.fr 49. MUHIRE JMV Head of curriculum DVPT 0788597268 muhirej@yahoo.fr 50. MUYENZI Wilson SDP Manager 0788303886 wmuyenzi@yahoo.fr 51. KAGANGO DIOGENE PBU 0788597657 kadiogene74@yahoo.fr 52. IBINGIRA FRANK PBU 0788422625 ibingiraf@gmail.com 53. BAMWINE Gordon PBU 0788889668 tumusimeg@yahoo.com 54. KARAMUTSA Gerard PBU 0788458762 karamutsag@yahoo.fr JICA S/N Candidates 55. Ryuichi NISHIYAMA Title Contacts email 56. Silas Niyitegeka TCT Project 2 Chief Advisor 0783042577 r.nishiyama@ssc-toky o.co.jp TCT Project 2 staff 0788877328 nsylas@yahoo.fr 57. SATOMI KAMEI JICA Rwanda officer 0788305528 Kamei.Satomi@jica.go.jp 58. TUGIRIMANA JP JICA Rwanda Education coordinator TCT Project 0788482625 tugirijp@gmail.com TATSUMI Aragaki Company supervisors S/N Candidates COMPANIES A.Tatsumi@unico-intl.co Contacts Email 59. NTIRENGANYA Vincen SportsView Hotel 0788301003 vincentntirenganya@gmail.c 60. HABIMANA Aime LandStar Hotel 0788532327 61. YUSUFU ATTDM Garage (GIKOND 0728753598 62. Real contractors Real contractors 0788597656 63. Manumetal Manumetal 0252574714 64. Sonatubes Sonatubes 0788300736 PSF S/N Candidates Title Contacts Email 65. MUNGWARAREBA DonDirector of Member services, 078830142 donatienm@psf.org.rw Capacity Building and Entrepreneurship Promotion 66. UWANTEGE Diane 078862104 dianuwa@yahoo.com Executive Director of crafts chamber GIZ S/N Candidates Title Contacts Email 67 ASSOUMANI HAKIZIM Private sector skills devpt Exper 078877577 assumani.hakizimana@giz. 68 SIGRID Jonas TA 078203324 sigridjonas@giz.de