1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 1
© 2010 Sweet & Maxwell
Rylands v Fletcher
Also known as:
Fletcher v Rylands
House of Lords
17 July 1868
Case Analysis
Where Reported
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330;
Case Digest
Subject: Real property
Keywords: Causes of action, Damage, Land drainage, Mines, Neighbouring land, Negligence
Abstract:
Judges: Lord Cairns, L.C.Cairns, Lord, LC
Appellate History
affirming
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
reversing
(1865-66) L.R. 1 Ex. 265; [1865-66] All E.R. Rep. 1; (1866) 4 Hurl. & C. 263
159 E.R. 737; (1865) 3 Hurl. & C. 774
Related Cases
Significant Cases Cited
St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping
11 E.R. 1483; (1865) 11 H.L. Cas. 642
HL
Allen v Hayward
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
115 E.R. 749; (1845) 7 Q.B. 960
QB
In re Williams v Groucott
122 E.R. 416; (1863) 4 B. & S. 149
KB
Smith v Kenrick
137 E.R. 205; (1849) 7 C.B. 515
QB
Imperial Gas Light and Coke Co v Broadbent
11 E.R. 239; (1859) 7 H.L. Cas. 600
QB
Bamford v Turnley
122 E.R. 25; (1860) 3 B. & S. 62
KB
Pickard v Smith
142 E.R. 535; (1861) 10 C.B. N.S. 470
CCP
Chadwick v Trower
133 E.R. 1; (1839) 6 Bing. N.C. 1
CCP
Sutton v Clarke
128 E.R. 943; (1815) 6 Taunt. 29
CCP
Baird v Williamson
143 E.R. 831; (1863) 15 C.B. N.S. 376
CCP
George Chasemore v Henry Richards
11 E.R. 140; (1859) 7 H.L. Cas. 349
HL
Partridge v Scott
150 E.R. 1124; (1838) 3 M. & W. 220
Ex Ct
Surtees v Lister
158 E.R. 367; (1861) 7 Hurl. & N. 1
Ex Ct
Tenant v Goldwin
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 2
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 3
92 E.R. 222; (1704) 2 Ld. Raym. 1089
KB
Acton v Blundell
152 E.R. 1223; (1843) 12 M. & W. 324
Ex Ct
Peachey v Rowland
138 E.R. 1167; (1853) 13 C.B. 182
CCP
Hodgkinson v Ennor
122 E.R. 446; (1863) 4 B. & S. 229
KB
Cases Citing This Case
considered
Cammidge v Young
[1997] C.L.Y. 3803
CC (Birmingham)
applied
Dunne v North Western Gas Board
[1964] 2 Q.B. 806; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 164; [1963] 3 All E.R. 916; 62 L.G.R. 197; (1963) 107 S.J. 890
CA
applied
Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc
[1993] Env. L.R. 116; Times, October 23, 1991
QBD
considered
Mitchell v Mason
(1966) 10 W.I.R. 26
CA
considered
Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd
[1947] A.C. 156; [1946] 2 All E.R. 471; (1947) 80 Ll. L. Rep. 1; (1946) 62 T.L.R. 646; [1947] L.J.R. 39; 175
L.T. 413
HL
applied
Weisler, Weisler and Seaboard Enterprises v District of North Vancouver, Delves, British Columbia Electric Co and Christie
(1959) 17 D.L.R. (2d) 319
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 4
distinguished
Landeys (Doncaster) v Fletcher
(1958) 109 L.J. 204
CC
considered
Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc
[1994] 2 A.C. 264; [1994] 2 W.L.R. 53; [1994] 1 All E.R. 53; [1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 261; [1994] Env. L.R. 105;
[1993] E.G. 211 (C.S.); (1994) 144 N.L.J. 15; (1994) 138 S.J.L.B. 24; Times, December 10, 1993; Independent,
December 10, 1993
HL
considered
Bedfordshire Police Authority v Constable
[2009] EWCA Civ 64; [2009] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 200; [2009] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 607; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
applied
Cordin v Newport City Council
Unreported, January 23, 2008
QBD (TCC)
applied
H&N Emanuel v Greater London Council
(1970) 114 S.J. 653; Times, July 21, 1970
QBD
applied
Ellison v Ministry of Defence
81 B.L.R. 101; Official Transcript
QBD (OR)
applied
Federic v Perpetual Investments
(1968) 2 D.L.R. (3d) 50
HC (Ont)
considered
Fowler v Lanning
[1959] 1 Q.B. 426; [1959] 2 W.L.R. 241; [1959] 1 All E.R. 290; (1959) 103 S.J. 157
QBD
considered
Balfour v Barty King
[1957] 1 Q.B. 496; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 84; [1957] 1 All E.R. 156; [1956] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 646; (1957) 101 S.J. 62
CA
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 5
applied
Canadian Forest Products v Hudson Lumber Co
(1960) 20 D.L.R. (2d) 712
Sup Ct (BC)
considered
Benning v Wong
(1969) 43 A.L.J.R. 467
HC (Aus)
considered
Pearson v North Western Gas Board
[1968] 2 All E.R. 669
Assizes (Manchester)
considered
J Doltis Ltd v Isaac Braithwaite & Sons (Engineers) Ltd
[1957] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 522
QBD
referred to
Holderness v Goslin
[1975] 2 N.Z.L.R. 46
applied
Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd
[1961] 1 W.L.R. 683; [1961] 2 All E.R. 145; (1961) 105 S.J. 209
QBD
applied
Home Brewery Co v William Davis & Co (Leicester)
[1987] Q.B. 339; [1987] 2 W.L.R. 117; [1987] 1 All E.R. 637; (1987) 84 L.S.G. 657; (1987) 131 S.J. 102;
Times, August 13, 1986
QBD
considered
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd
[1970] A.C. 1004; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 1140; [1970] 2 All E.R. 294; [1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 453; (1970) 114 S.J. 375
HL
applied
E Hobbs (Farms) Ltd v Baxenden (Chemical Co) Ltd
[1992] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 54
QBD
referred to
Mihalchuk v Ratke
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 6
(1966) 57 D.L.R. (2d) 269
referred to
Lamberty v Saskatchewan Power Corp
(1966) 59 D.L.R. (2d) 246
considered
Salsbury v Woodland
[1970] 1 Q.B. 324; [1969] 3 W.L.R. 29; [1969] 3 All E.R. 863; (1969) 113 S.J. 327
CA (Civ Div)
applied
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Southport Corp
[1953] 3 W.L.R. 773; [1953] 2 All E.R. 1204; [1953] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 414; (1954) 118 J.P. 1; 52 L.G.R. 22;
(1953) 97 S.J. 764
Assizes (Liverpool)
applied
Shell-Mex & BP v Belfast Corp
[1952] N.I. 72
CA
considered
Mandraj and Mandraj v Texaco Trinidad Inc
(1969) 15 W.I.R. 251
CA (Trin)
applied
Seaway Hotels v Canada Cragg and Consumers Gas Co
(1959) 17 D.L.R. (2d) 292
considered
A Prosser & Son Ltd v Levy
[1955] 1 W.L.R. 1224; [1955] 3 All E.R. 577; (1955) 99 S.J. 815
CA
applied
Aldridge and O'Brien v Van Patter
[1952] 4 D.L.R. 93
HC (Ont)
applied
Hiller v Air Ministry
Times, December 8, 1962
distinguished
Perkins v Glyn
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
[1976] C.L.Y. 1883
CC
applied
Bowden v South West Water Services Ltd
[1998] 3 C.M.L.R. 330; [1998] Eu. L.R. 418; [1998] Env. L.R. 445
QBD
distinguished
Perry v Kendricks Transport
[1956] 1 W.L.R. 85; [1956] 1 All E.R. 154; (1956) 100 S.J. 52
CA
considered
McLaughlan v Craig
1948 S.C. 599; 1948 S.L.T. 483; 1948 S.L.T. (Notes) 53
IH (1 Div)
applied
Gilson v Kerrier DC
[1976] 1 W.L.R. 904; [1976] 3 All E.R. 343; 75 L.G.R. 60; (1976) 120 S.J. 572
CA (Civ Div)
not applied
Bottoni v Henderson
(1978) 90 D.L.R. (3d) 301
HC (Ont)
referred to
Matheson v Northcote College Board of Governors
[1975] 2 N.Z.L.R. 106
considered
Smith v Scott
[1973] Ch. 314; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 783; [1972] 3 All E.R. 645; (1972) 116 S.J. 785
Ch D
considered
Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co
[1964] 1 Q.B. 518; [1964] 2 W.L.R. 240; [1964] 1 All E.R. 98; (1964) 108 S.J. 53
CA
applied
James (Noel T) v Central Electricity Authority
(1958) 108 L.J. 250
applied
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 7
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 8
Rogers v Kaus
[1976] C.L.Y. 330.u
considered
Wise Bros Pty v Commissioner for Railways (NSW)
75 C.L.R. 59; (1947) 21 A.L.J. 287
HC (Aus)
considered
Transco Plc v Stockport MBC
[2001] EWCA Civ 212; [2001] Env. L.R. 44; (2001) 3 L.G.L.R. 33; [2001] 9 E.G. 228 (C.S.); (2001) 98(9)
L.S.G. 42; [2001] Env. L.R. D11; Daily Telegraph, March 6, 2001; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
considered
C Burley Ltd v Stepney Corp
[1947] 1 All E.R. 507; (1947) 80 Ll. L. Rep. 289; (1947) 111 J.P. 258; 176 L.T. 535
KBD
applied
Curtis v Lutes
[1953] 4 D.L.R. 188
CA (Ont)
distinguished
Lewis v North Vancouver (District of)
(1963) 40 D.L.R. (2d) 182
applied
Lindsay and Lindsay v R.
(1956) 5 D.L.R. (2d) 349
Ex Ct (Can)
considered
Smeaton v Ilford Corp
[1954] Ch. 450; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 668; [1954] 1 All E.R. 923; (1954) 118 J.P. 290; 52 L.G.R. 253; (1954) 98 S.J.
251
Ch D
applied
British Celanese Ltd v AH Hunt (Capacitors) Ltd
[1969] 1 W.L.R. 959; [1969] 2 All E.R. 1252; (1969) 113 S.J. 368
QBD
considered
Smith v Lewisham LBC
Times, June 8, 1972
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 9
Ch D
referred to
Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather Plc
[1993] Env. L.R. 287; [1992] N.P.C. 147; Times, December 29, 1992
CA (Civ Div)
applied
Downes v Cameron
[1976] C.L.Y. 332.u
applied
Neath Rural DC v Williams
[1951] 1 K.B. 115; [1950] 2 All E.R. 625; 66 T.L.R. (Pt. 2) 539; (1950) 114 J.P. 464; 49 L.G.R. 177; (1950) 94
S.J. 568
DC
considered
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound)
[1963] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 402
Sup Ct (NSW)
applied
Vaughn v Halifax-Dartmouth Bridge Commission
(1961) 29 D.L.R. (2d) 523
applied
Petter v Metropolitan Properties Co
(1974) 231 E.G. 491
CA (Civ Div)
applied
Petter v Metropolitan Properties Co
(1973) 229 E.G. 973
HC
applied
Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd
[1957] 2 Q.B. 1; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 404; [1957] 1 All E.R. 583; (1957) 101 S.J. 208
QBD
applied
Ryeford Homes Ltd v Sevenoaks DC
46 B.L.R. 34; 16 Con. L.R. 75; [1989] 2 E.G.L.R. 281; (1990) 6 Const. L.J. 170; [1990] J.P.L. 36; (1989) 139
N.L.J. 255; Times, February 15, 1989; Independent, February 14, 1989
QBD
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 10
applied
Barrette v Franki Compressed Pile Co of Canada
[1955] 2 D.L.R. 665
CJ (Gen Div) (Ont)
considered
Transco Plc v Stockport MBC
[2003] UKHL 61; [2004] 2 A.C. 1; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 1467; [2004] 1 All E.R. 589; 91 Con. L.R. 28; [2004] Env.
L.R. 24; [2003] 48 E.G. 127 (C.S.); (2003) 153 N.L.J. 1791; (2003) 147 S.J.L.B. 1367; [2003] N.P.C. 143;
[2004] 1 P. & C.R. DG12; Times, November 20, 2003; Independent, November 25, 2003; Official Transcript
HL
considered
Sochacki v Sas
[1947] 1 All E.R. 344
KBD
applied
Heintzman & Co v Hashman Construction
(1972) 32 D.L.R. (3d) 622
Sup Ct (Alta)
considered
RHM Bakeries (Scotland) Ltd v Strathclyde RC
1985 S.C. (H.L.) 17; 1985 S.L.T. 214; Times, January 29, 1985
HL
applied
Crown River Cruises Ltd v Kimbolton Fireworks Ltd
[1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 533; [1996] C.L.C. 1214; Times, March 6, 1996
QBD (Comm)
applied
LMS International Ltd v Styrene Packaging & Insulation Ltd
[2005] EWHC 2065 (TCC); [2006] T.C.L.R. 6; Official Transcript
QBD (TCC)
considered
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd v British Celanese Ltd
[1952] 1 All E.R. 1326; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 1013; 50 L.G.R. 488; [1952] W.N. 227; (1952) 96 S.J. 263
Ch D
distinguished
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
[1980] Q.B. 485; [1980] 2 W.L.R. 65; [1980] 1 All E.R. 17; 78 L.G.R. 100; (1979) 123 S.J. 606
CA (Civ Div)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 11
considered
Boxes Ltd v British Waterways Board
[1971] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 183; 70 L.G.R. 1
CA (Civ Div)
Essa v Laing Ltd
[2003] I.C.R. 1110; [2003] I.R.L.R. 346; (2003) 100(18) L.S.G. 34; Times, April 7, 2003; Official Transcript
EAT
Boynton v Ancholme Drainage and Navigation Commissioners
[1921] 2 K.B. 213
CA
Booth v Thomas
[1926] Ch. 109
Ch D
Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Parke
[1899] A.C. 535
PC (Can)
Cowper-Essex v Acton Local Board
(1889) L.R. 14 App. Cas. 153
HL
Western Silver Fox Ranch Ltd v Ross and Cromarty CC
1940 S.C. 601; 1940 S.L.T. 144
OH
Glasgow DC v Carroll
1991 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 46; 1991 S.C.L.R. 199
Sh Ct (Glasgow)
Newcastle under Lyme Corp v Wolstanton Ltd
[1947] Ch. 92; [1946] 2 All E.R. 447
Ch D
Jordeson v Sutton Southcoates and Drypool Gas Co
[1899] 2 Ch. 217
CA
Leong Bee & Co v Ling Nam Rubber Works
[1970] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 247; (1970) 114 S.J. 806
PC (Mal)
Lippiatt v South Gloucestershire Council
[2000] Q.B. 51; [1999] 3 W.L.R. 137; [1999] 4 All E.R. 149; (1999) 31 H.L.R. 1114; (1999) 1 L.G.L.R. 865;
[1999] B.L.G.R. 562; (1999) 96(15) L.S.G. 31; Times, April 9, 1999; Independent, April 30, 1999
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 12
CA (Civ Div)
Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc
[2009] EWHC 540 (Comm); [2009] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 1; [2009] 1 C.L.C. 186; (2009) 153(12) S.J.L.B. 29; Official
Transcript
QBD (Comm)
Hamilton v Papakura DC
[2002] UKPC 9; (2002) 146 S.J.L.B. 75; Times, March 5, 2002; Official Transcript
PC (NZ)
Canadian Pacific Railway Co v Roy
[1902] A.C. 220
PC (Can)
Corby Group Litigation Claimants v Corby BC
[2008] EWCA Civ 463; [2009] Q.B. 335; [2009] 2 W.L.R. 609; [2009] 4 All E.R. 44; [2008] C.P. Rep. 32;
[2008] B.L.R. 411; [2009] Env. L.R. 2; [2008] P.I.Q.R. P16; [2008] C.I.L.L. 2597; [2009] J.P.L. 64; [2008] 19
E.G. 204 (C.S.); (2008) 152(21) S.J.L.B. 32; [2008] N.P.C. 58; Times, May 28, 2008; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Manton v Brocklebank
[1923] 1 K.B. 406
KBD
Baxter v Camden LBC (No.2)
[2001] Q.B. 1; [1999] 2 W.L.R. 566; [1999] 1 All E.R. 237; [1999] Env. L.R. 561; (1999) 31 H.L.R. 356; [1999]
B.L.G.R. 239; [1999] L. & T.R. 136; [1998] E.G. 157 (C.S.); (1998) 95(45) L.S.G. 41; (1999) 143 S.J.L.B. 11;
[1998] N.P.C. 147; [1999] E.H.L.R. Dig. 205; Times, November 11, 1998
CA (Civ Div)
Blake v Barking and Dagenham LBC
(1998) 30 H.L.R. 963; [1999] P.N.L.R. 171; [1996] E.G. 145 (C.S.); [1996] N.P.C. 134; Times, November 1,
1996
QBD
Westhoughton Coal and Cannel Co Ltd v Wigan Coal Corp Ltd
[1939] Ch. 393
Ch D
Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)
[2003] EWCA Civ 65; [2003] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 1; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 327; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 325; (2003)
100(13) L.S.G. 27; [2003] Env. L.R. D11; Times, February 27, 2003; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd (The Esso Bernicia)
[1989] A.C. 643; [1988] 3 W.L.R. 730; [1989] 1 All E.R. 37; [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 8; 1988 S.L.T. 874; (1988)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 13
85(42) L.S.G. 48; (1988) 132 S.J. 1459; Times, October 7, 1988
HL
Delaware Mansions Ltd v Westminster City Council
[2001] UKHL 55; [2002] 1 A.C. 321; [2001] 3 W.L.R. 1007; [2001] 4 All E.R. 737; [2002] B.L.R. 25; [2002]
T.C.L.R. 8; 79 Con. L.R. 39; [2002] B.L.G.R. 1; [2001] 44 E.G. 150 (C.S.); (2001) 98(45) L.S.G. 26; (2001) 151
N.L.J. 1611; (2001) 145 S.J.L.B. 259; [2001] N.P.C. 151; Times, October 26, 2001; Independent, December 17,
2001; Official Transcript
HL
Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No.6)
[2002] UKHL 19; [2002] 2 A.C. 883; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1353; [2002] 3 All E.R. 209; [2002] 1 All E.R. (Comm)
843; [2003] 1 C.L.C. 183; Times, May 21, 2002; Official Transcript
HL
Jan De Nul (UK) Ltd v Axa Royale Belge SA (formerly NV Royale Belge)
[2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 700; [2001] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 327; Official Transcript
QBD (Comm)
Blue Circle Industries Plc v Ministry of Defence
[1999] Ch. 289; [1999] 2 W.L.R. 295; [1998] 3 All E.R. 385; [1999] Env. L.R. 22; [1998] E.G. 93 (C.S.); [1998]
N.P.C. 100; Times, June 16, 1998
CA (Civ Div)
Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Co v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd (Preliminary Issues)
[2004] EWHC 2197 (Comm); [2005] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 669; [2005] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 494; [2005] 2 C.L.C. 617;
[2005] B.L.R. 47; 98 Con. L.R. 21; [2005] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 74; [2004] 42 E.G. 160 (C.S.); Official Transcript
QBD (Comm)
Montreal Transportation Co Ltd v King, The
(1926) 24 Ll. L. Rep. 242
PC (Can)
Fletcher v Bealey
(1885) L.R. 28 Ch. D. 688
Ch D
Dixon v Metropolitan Board of Works
(1880-81) L.R. 7 Q.B.D. 418
QBD
News Group Newspapers Ltd v Society of Graphical and Allied Trades (SOGAT) 1982
[1987] I.C.R. 181; [1986] I.R.L.R. 337; (1986) 136 N.L.J. 893; Times, August 1, 1986
QBD
Dymond v Pearce
[1972] 1 Q.B. 496; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 633; [1972] 1 All E.R. 1142; [1972] R.T.R. 169; (1972) 116 S.J. 62
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 14
CA (Civ Div)
Rapier v London Tramways Co
[1893] 2 Ch. 588
CA
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
[1973] Q.B. 27; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 502; [1972] 3 All E.R. 557; 14 K.I.R. 75; (1972) 116 S.J. 648
CA (Civ Div)
Price v Cromack
[1975] 1 W.L.R. 988; [1975] 2 All E.R. 113; (1975) 119 S.J. 458
QBD
Thomas & Evans Ltd v Mid-Rhondda Cooperative Society Ltd
[1941] 1 K.B. 381
CA
Cheater v Cater
[1917] 2 K.B. 516
KBD
Lowery v Walker
[1910] 1 K.B. 173
CA
Manchester Corp v Markland
[1934] 1 K.B. 566
CA
Merlin v British Nuclear Fuels Plc
[1990] 2 Q.B. 557; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 383; [1990] 3 All E.R. 711
QBD
Kay, Re
[1968] 1 Q.B. 140; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 695; [1967] 3 All E.R. 22; 3 K.I.R. 18; (1967) 111 S.J. 351
CA (Civ Div)
Butler v Standard Telephones & Cables Ltd
[1940] 1 K.B. 399
KBD
McKenna v British Aluminium Ltd
[2002] Env. L.R. 30; Times, April 25, 2002; Official Transcript
Ch D
Arscott v Coal Authority
[2004] EWCA Civ 892; [2005] Env. L.R. 6; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 880; [2004] N.P.C. 114; Official Transcript
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 15
CA (Civ Div)
Bridlington Relay v Yorkshire Electricity Board
[1965] Ch. 436; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 349; [1965] 1 All E.R. 264; (1965) 109 S.J. 12
Ch D
Graigola Merthyr Co Ltd v Swansea Corp
[1928] Ch. 31
Ch D
Cheater v Cater
[1918] 1 K.B. 247
CA
Phillips v Britannia Hygienic Laundry Co Ltd
[1923] 1 K.B. 539
KBD
Radstock Cooperative & Industrial Society v Norton-Radstock Urban DC
[1967] Ch. 1094; [1967] 3 W.L.R. 588; [1967] 2 All E.R. 812; (1967) 131 J.P. 387; 65 L.G.R. 518
Ch D
Fletcher v Smith
(1871-72) L.R. 7 Ex. 305; (1869-72) L.R. 2 P. & D. 20
Ex Ct
Countess of Rothes v Kirkcaldy and Dysart Waterworks Commissioners
(1881-82) L.R. 7 App. Cas. 694; (1882) 9 R. (H.L.) 108
HL
Lupton (Inspector of Taxes) v FA & AB Ltd
[1972] A.C. 634; [1971] 3 W.L.R. 670; [1971] 3 All E.R. 948; 47 T.C. 580; [1971] T.R. 284; (1971) 115 S.J.
849
HL
Shipsey v British & South American Steam Navigation Co
(1936) 54 Ll. L. Rep. 188
Sup Ct (Irl)
Alegrete Shipping Co Inc v International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund 1971 (The Sea Empress)
[2002] EWHC 1095 (Admlty); [2002] 2 All E.R. (Comm) 416; [2003] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 123; [2003] Env. L.R. 8;
[2003] Env. L.R. D2; Official Transcript
QBD (Admlty)
Rainham Chemical Works Ltd (In Liquidation) v Belvedere Fish Guano Co Ltd
[1921] 2 A.C. 465
HL
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 16
Nichols v Marsland
(1874-75) L.R. 10 Ex. 255
Ex Ct
Whalley v Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Co
(1883-84) L.R. 13 Q.B.D. 131
CA
Anderson v Buckhaven and Methil Burgh
1955 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 50; (1955) 71 Sh. Ct. Rep. 180
Sh Ct (Tayside)
Bowie v Wylie
(1899) 6 S.L.T. 315
IH (2 Div)
Balfour v Barty King
[1956] 1 W.L.R. 779; [1956] 2 All E.R. 555; [1956] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 600; (1956) 100 S.J. 472
QBD
Dodd Properties (Kent) Ltd v Canterbury City Council
[1980] 1 W.L.R. 433; [1980] 1 All E.R. 928; 13 B.L.R. 45; (1979) 253 E.G. 1335; (1980) 124 S.J. 84
CA (Civ Div)
Beckett v Newalls Insulation Co
[1953] 1 W.L.R. 8; [1953] 1 All E.R. 250; [1953] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 53; (1953) 97 S.J. 8
CA
Sturge v Hackett
[1962] 1 W.L.R. 1257; [1962] 3 All E.R. 166; [1962] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 626; (1962) 106 S.J. 568
CA
Midwood & Co v Manchester Corp
[1905] 2 K.B. 597
CA
Bartlett v Tottenham
[1932] 1 Ch. 114
Ch D
Dell v Chesham Urban DC
[1921] 3 K.B. 427
KBD
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority
[1983] 3 W.L.R. 105; [1983] 1 All E.R. 892; 81 L.G.R. 599; (1983) 127 S.J. 426; Times, December 9, 1982
QBD
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 17
Deen v Davies
[1935] 2 K.B. 282
CA
Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd
[1924] 1 K.B. 1
CA
Crompton v Lea
(1874-75) L.R. 19 Eq. 115
Ct of Chancery
King v Liverpool City Council
[1986] 1 W.L.R. 890; [1986] 3 All E.R. 544; (1986) 18 H.L.R. 307; 84 L.G.R. 871; [1986] 1 E.G.L.R. 181;
(1986) 278 E.G. 278; (1986) 83 L.S.G. 2492; (1986) 136 N.L.J. 334; (1986) 130 S.J. 505
CA (Civ Div)
Barker v Herbert
[1911] 2 K.B. 633
CA
Henderson v John Stuart (Farms) Ltd
1963 S.C. 245; 1963 S.L.T. 22; 1962 S.L.T. (Notes) 102
OH
D McIntyre & Son Ltd v Soutar
1980 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 115
Sh Ct (Tayside)
Alphacell Ltd v Woodward
[1972] A.C. 824; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 1320; [1972] 2 All E.R. 475; 70 L.G.R. 455; [1972] Crim. L.R. 41; (1972)
116 S.J. 431
HL
Jones v Pritchard
[1908] 1 Ch. 630
Ch D
Child v Hearn
(1873-74) L.R. 9 Ex. 176
Ex Ct
Bedfordshire Police Authority v Constable
[2008] EWHC 1375 (Comm); [2009] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 39; Official Transcript
QBD (Comm)
Radstock Cooperative & Industrial Society v Norton-Radstock Urban DC
[1968] Ch. 605; [1968] 2 W.L.R. 1214; [1968] 2 All E.R. 59; (1968) 132 J.P. 238; 66 L.G.R. 457; (1968) 112
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 18
S.J. 135
CA (Civ Div)
Alphacell Ltd v Woodward
[1972] 1 Q.B. 127; [1971] 3 W.L.R. 445; [1971] 2 All E.R. 910; 69 L.G.R. 561; (1971) 115 S.J. 464
QBD
Bluett v Suffolk CC
[2004] EWHC 378 (QB); Official Transcript
QBD
RH Buckley & Sons Ltd v N Buckley & Sons
[1898] 2 Q.B. 608
CA
Weller & Co v Foot & Mouth Disease Research Institute
[1966] 1 Q.B. 569; [1965] 3 W.L.R. 1082; [1965] 3 All E.R. 560; [1965] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 414; (1965) 109 S.J.
702
QBD
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire
[1985] 1 W.L.R. 1242; [1985] 2 All E.R. 985; (1986) 83 L.S.G. 46
QBD
Rainham Chemical Works Ltd (In Liquidation) v Belvedere Fish Guano Co Ltd
[1920] 2 K.B. 487
CA
Attorney General v Corke
[1933] Ch. 89
Ch D
Marshall v Moncrieffe
1912 2 S.L.T. 306
Sh Ct
C (A Minor) v DPP
[1996] A.C. 1; [1995] 2 W.L.R. 383; [1995] 2 All E.R. 43; [1995] 2 Cr. App. R. 166; (1995) 159 J.P. 269;
[1995] R.T.R. 261; [1995] 1 F.L.R. 933; [1995] Crim. L.R. 801; [1995] Fam. Law 400; (1995) 159 J.P.N. 248;
(1995) 145 N.L.J. 416; Times, March 17, 1995; Independent, March 21, 1995
HL
I&J Hyman (Sales) Ltd v A Benedyk & Co Ltd
[1957] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 601
CC (Lambeth)
Smith v Giddy
[1904] 2 K.B. 448
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 19
KBD
Eastern and South African Telegraph Co Ltd v Cape Town Tramway Cos Ltd
[1902] A.C. 381
PC (Cape)
Shirvell v Hackwood Estates Co Ltd
[1938] 2 K.B. 577
CA
Attorney General v PYA Quarries Ltd (No.1)
[1957] 2 Q.B. 169; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 770; [1957] 1 All E.R. 894; (1957) 121 J.P. 323; 55 L.G.R. 208; (1957) 101
S.J. 338
CA
Holliday v Wakefield Borough
(1888) L.R. 20 Q.B.D. 699
CA
Kiddle v City Business Properties Ltd
[1942] 1 K.B. 269
KBD
Foster v Warblington Urban DC
[1906] 1 K.B. 648
CA
Greenock Corp v Caledonian Railway Co
[1917] A.C. 556; 1917 S.C. (H.L.) 56; 1917 2 S.L.T. 67
HL
Fletcher v Smith
(1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 781
HL
Knott v London CC
[1934] 1 K.B. 126
CA
Wing v London General Omnibus Co
[1909] 2 K.B. 652
CA
Pride of Derby and Derbyshire Angling Association Ltd v British Celanese Ltd
[1953] Ch. 149; [1953] 2 W.L.R. 58; [1953] 1 All E.R. 179; (1953) 117 J.P. 52; 51 L.G.R. 121; (1953) 97 S.J.
28
CA
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Haseldine v Daw & Son Ltd
[1941] 2 K.B. 343
CA
Ballard v Tomlinson
(1884) L.R. 26 Ch. D. 194
Ch D
Postmaster General v Liverpool Corp
(1921) 9 Ll. L. Rep. 351
KBD
Anderson v Oppenheimer
(1879-80) L.R. 5 Q.B.D. 602
CA
Snow v Whitehead
(1884) L.R. 27 Ch. D. 588
Ch D
Phillimore v Watford Rural DC
[1913] 2 Ch. 434
Ch D
Holliday v Wakefield Borough
[1891] A.C. 81
HL
Noble v Harrison
[1926] 2 K.B. 332; 49 A.L.R. 833
KBD
Quebec Railway Light Heat and Power Co Ltd v Vandry
[1920] A.C. 662
PC (Can)
Malone v Laskey
[1907] 2 K.B. 141
CA
North Western Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee & Accident Co Ltd
[1936] A.C. 108; (1935) 53 Ll. L. Rep. 67; (1935) 53 Ll. L. Rep. 67; [1935] W.N. 176
PC (Can)
Howard v Furness-Houlder Argentine Lines Ltd
(1936) 55 Ll. L. Rep. 121
KBD
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 20
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 21
Dunn v Birmingham Canal Navigation Co Proprietors
(1872-73) L.R. 8 Q.B. 42
Ex Chamber
Jones v Festiniog Railway Co
(1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 733
QB
Intpro Properties (UK) v Sauvel
[1983] Q.B. 1019; [1983] 2 W.L.R. 1; [1983] 1 All E.R. 658; (1983) 127 S.J. 16; Times, December 1, 1982
QBD
Ancell & Ancell v McDermott
[1993] 4 All E.R. 355; [1993] R.T.R. 235; (1994) 6 Admin. L.R. 473; (1995) 159 L.G. Rev. 389; (1993) 90(11)
L.S.G. 46; (1993) 143 N.L.J. 363; (1993) 137 S.J.L.B. 36; [1994] J.P.I.L. 78; Times, February 4, 1993; Independent, February 18, 1993
CA (Civ Div)
Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No.2)
[2000] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 1; [2000] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 218; [2000] Lloyd's Rep. Bank. 40; [2000] C.L.C. 133;
Times, March 15, 2000; Independent, December 9, 1999; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Societe Francaise Bunge SA v Belcan NV (The Federal Huron)
[1988] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 288
Sup Ct (PNG)
Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd
[2002] EWHC 1131 (TCC); [2002] 3 All E.R. 574; 86 Con. L.R. 74; [2002] N.P.C. 17; Official Transcript
QBD (TCC)
John Young & Co v Bankier Distillery Co
[1893] A.C. 691; (1893) 1 S.L.T. 204
HL
West Cumberland Iron & Steel Co v Kenyon
(1877) L.R. 6 Ch. D. 773
Ch D
Baker v Snell
[1908] 2 K.B. 825
CA
Great Western Railway Co v Owners of the SS Mostyn
[1928] A.C. 57; (1927-28) 29 Ll. L. Rep. 293
HL
Hoare & Co v McAlpine
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 22
[1923] 1 Ch. 167
Ch D
Brackenborough v Spalding Urban DC
[1940] 1 K.B. 675
CA
McQuaker v Goddard
[1940] 1 K.B. 687
CA
Postmaster General v Liverpool Corp
(1922) 12 Ll. L. Rep. 105
CA
Bybrook Barn Garden Centre Ltd v Kent CC
[2001] B.L.R. 55; [2001] Env. L.R. 30; (2001) 3 L.G.L.R. 27; [2001] B.L.G.R. 239; (2001) 98(14) L.S.G. 39;
[2000] N.P.C. 135; Times, January 5, 2001; Daily Telegraph, December 19, 2000; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Davie (James Pennycook) v Edinburgh City Council (No.1)
1951 S.C. 720; 1952 S.L.T. 74
IH (1 Div)
Bolton v Stone
[1951] A.C. 850; [1951] 1 All E.R. 1078; [1951] 1 T.L.R. 977; 50 L.G.R. 32; (1951) 95 S.J. 333
HL
Nitro Phosphate & Odam's Chemical Manure Co v London and St Katharine Docks Co
(1878) L.R. 9 Ch. D. 503
CA
Salt Union Ltd v Brunner Mond & Co
[1906] 2 K.B. 822
KBD
Bolton v Stone
[1950] 1 K.B. 201; [1949] 2 All E.R. 851; 65 T.L.R. 683; 48 L.G.R. 107; (1949) 93 S.J. 710
CA
Job Edwards Ltd v Birmingham Navigations Proprietors
[1924] 1 K.B. 341
CA
Green v Lord Somerleyton
[2003] EWCA Civ 198; [2004] 1 P. & C.R. 33; [2003] 11 E.G. 152 (C.S.); (2003) 100(10) L.S.G. 31; [2003]
N.P.C. 29; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Pontardawe Rural DC v Moore-Gwyn
[1929] 1 Ch. 656
Ch D
Sutton v Clarke
128 E.R. 943; (1815) 6 Taunt. 29
CCP
Glanville v Sutton
[1928] 1 K.B. 571
KBD
National Telephone Co v Baker
[1893] 2 Ch. 186
Ch D
Miller v Robert Addie & Sons Collieries Ltd
1934 S.C. 150; 1934 S.L.T. 160
IH (2 Div)
Cockburn v Smith
[1924] 2 K.B. 119
CA
Ilford Urban DC v Beal
[1925] 1 K.B. 671
KBD
Blake v Woolf
[1898] 2 Q.B. 426
QBD
Nichols v Marsland
(1876-77) L.R. 2 Ex. D. 1
CA
Wilkins v Leighton
[1932] 2 Ch. 106
Ch D
Bower v Peate
(1875-76) L.R. 1 Q.B.D. 321
QBD
Akerib v Booth & Others Ltd
[1960] 1 W.L.R. 454; [1960] 1 All E.R. 481; (1960) 104 S.J. 350
Assizes (Manchester)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 23
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 24
West v Bristol Tramways Co
[1908] 2 K.B. 16 (Note)
KBD
McKendrick v Sinclair
1972 S.C. (H.L.) 25; 1972 S.L.T. 110; Times, March 21, 1972
HL
Margereson v JW Roberts Ltd
[1996] P.I.Q.R. P154
QBD
River Wear Commissioners v Adamson
(1876-77) L.R. 2 App. Cas. 743
HL
Watt v Jamieson
1954 S.C. 56; 1954 S.L.T. 56
OH
Charing Cross Electricity Supply Co v Hydraulic Power Co
[1913] 3 K.B. 442
KBD
Holgate v Bleazard
[1917] 1 K.B. 443
KBD
Manton v Brocklebank
[1923] 2 K.B. 212
CA
Ballard v Tomlinson
(1885) L.R. 29 Ch. D. 115
CA
Department of Transport v North West Water Authority
[1984] A.C. 336; [1983] 3 W.L.R. 707; [1983] 3 All E.R. 273; 82 L.G.R. 207; (1983) 133 N.L.J. 1016; (1983)
127 S.J. 713
HL
AB v South West Water Services Ltd
[1993] Q.B. 507; [1993] 2 W.L.R. 507; [1993] 1 All E.R. 609; [1993] Env. L.R. 266; [1993] P.I.Q.R. P167;
(1993) 143 N.L.J. 235; [1992] N.P.C. 146; Times, November 26, 1992; Independent, November 18, 1992
CA (Civ Div)
Jones v Llanrwst Urban DC
[1911] 1 Ch. 393
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 25
Ch D
MCA Records Inc v Charly Records Ltd (No.5)
[2000] E.M.L.R. 743; (2000) 23(7) I.P.D. 23056; Official Transcript
Ch D
Montreal v Watt & Scott Ltd
[1922] 2 A.C. 555
PC (Can)
Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd
[2002] EWCA Civ 64; [2002] Q.B. 929; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 932; [2002] 2 All E.R. 55; [2002] B.L.R. 174; [2002]
T.C.L.R. 15; 81 Con. L.R. 193; [2002] Env. L.R. 32; [2003] E.H.L.R. 2; [2002] H.R.L.R. 22; [2002] U.K.H.R.R.
1041; (2002) 18 Const. L.J. 152; [2002] 7 E.G. 122 (C.S.); (2002) 99(12) L.S.G. 34; (2002) 146 S.J.L.B. 51;
[2002] N.P.C. 20; Times, February 14, 2002; Independent, February 12, 2002; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Marsh v Powys CC
(1998) 75 P. & C.R. 538; [1997] 2 E.G.L.R. 177; [1997] 33 E.G. 100; [1997] R.V.R. 283; [1998] J.P.L. 496
Lands Tr
Yorkshire Water Services Ltd v Sun Alliance and London Insurance Plc (No.2)
[1998] Env. L.R. 204
QBD (OR)
C Evans & Son Ltd v Spritebrand Ltd
[1983] Q.B. 310; [1985] 1 W.L.R. 317; [1985] 2 All E.R. 415; (1985) 1 B.C.C. 99316; [1985] P.C.C. 109;
[1985] F.S.R. 267; (1985) 82 L.S.G. 606; (1985) 129 S.J. 189
CA (Civ Div)
Davis v Balfour Kilpatrick Ltd
[2002] EWCA Civ 736; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd
[1997] A.C. 655; [1997] 2 W.L.R. 684; [1997] 2 All E.R. 426; [1997] C.L.C. 1045; 84 B.L.R. 1; 54 Con. L.R.
12; [1997] Env. L.R. 488; [1997] 2 F.L.R. 342; (1998) 30 H.L.R. 409; [1997] Fam. Law 601; [1997] E.G. 59
(C.S.); (1997) 94(19) L.S.G. 25; (1997) 147 N.L.J. 634; (1997) 141 S.J.L.B. 108; [1997] N.P.C. 64; Times,
April 25, 1997; Independent, May 2, 1997
HL
Douglas-Scott v Scorgie
[1984] 1 W.L.R. 716; [1984] 1 All E.R. 1086; (1984) 13 H.L.R. 97; (1984) 48 P. & C.R. 109; (1984) 269 E.G.
1164; (1984) 81 L.S.G. 663; (1984) 128 S.J. 264
CA (Civ Div)
P Perl (Exporters) Ltd v Camden LBC
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 26
[1984] Q.B. 342; [1983] 3 W.L.R. 769; [1983] 3 All E.R. 161; (1980) 80 L.S.G. 2216; (1980) 77 L.S.G. 2216;
(1983) 127 S.J. 581
CA (Civ Div)
Colour Quest Ltd v Total Downstream UK Plc
[2010] EWCA Civ 180; [2010] 1 C.L.C. 343; 129 Con. L.R. 104; [2010] 10 E.G. 117 (C.S.); Times, March 30,
2010; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
SCM (United Kingdom) Ltd v WJ Whittall & Son Ltd
[1970] 1 W.L.R. 1017; [1970] 2 All E.R. 417; 8 K.I.R. 1073; (1970) 114 S.J. 268
QBD
Hall v Duke of Norfolk
[1900] 2 Ch. 493
Ch D
Miller v Jackson
[1977] Q.B. 966; [1977] 3 W.L.R. 20; [1977] 3 All E.R. 338
CA (Civ Div)
Savage v Fairclough
[2000] Env. L.R. 183; [1999] N.P.C. 103; [2000] E.H.L.R. Dig. 97; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
British Railways Board v Herrington
[1972] A.C. 877; [1972] 2 W.L.R. 537; [1972] 1 All E.R. 749; (1972) 116 S.J. 178
HL
RHM Bakeries (Scotland) Ltd v Strathclyde RC
1985 S.L.T. 3
IH (2 Div)
Duke of Westminster v Guild
[1985] Q.B. 688; [1984] 3 W.L.R. 630; [1984] 3 All E.R. 144; (1984) 48 P. & C.R. 42; (1983) 267 E.G. 762;
(1984) 128 S.J. 581
CA (Civ Div)
Goldman v Hargrave
[1967] 1 A.C. 645; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 513; [1966] 2 All E.R. 989; [1966] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 65; (1966) 110 S.J. 527
PC (Aus)
R. v Associated Octel Co Ltd
[1994] 4 All E.R. 1051; [1995] I.C.R. 281; [1994] I.R.L.R. 540; (1994) 91(36) L.S.G. 37; (1994) 144 N.L.J.
1312; (1994) 138 S.J.L.B. 194; Times, August 3, 1994; Independent, August 29, 1994
CA (Crim Div)
Eastern Counties Leather Plc v Eastern Counties Leather Group Ltd
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 27
[2002] EWCA Civ 1636; [2003] Env. L.R. 13; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
AB v South West Water Services Ltd
[1992] 4 All E.R. 574; [1993] Env. L.R. 176; [1992] P.I.Q.R. P224; (1992) 142 N.L.J. 897; Times, May 8, 1992;
Independent, May 15, 1992
QBD
Greenwell v Low Beechburn Coal Co
[1897] 2 Q.B. 165
QBD
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (The Wagon Mound)
[1967] 1 A.C. 617; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 498; [1966] 2 All E.R. 709; [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 657; (1966) 110 S.J. 447
PC (Aus)
Stretton's Derby Brewery Co v Mayor of Derby
[1894] 1 Ch. 431
Ch D
Cunard v Antifyre
[1933] 1 K.B. 551
KBD
Hughes v Percival
(1882-83) L.R. 8 App. Cas. 443
HL
Humphries v Cousins
(1876-77) L.R. 2 C.P.D. 239
CPD
Filburn v Peoples Palace and Aquarium Co Ltd
(1890) L.R. 25 Q.B.D. 258
CA
Attorney General v Tomline (Flood Damage)
(1879) L.R. 12 Ch. D. 214
Ch D
Spiers v Newton-On-Ayr Gas Co Ltd
1942 S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 2
Sh Ct (South Strathclyde)
Stearn v Prentice Bros Ltd
[1919] 1 K.B. 394
KBD
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 28
Wilson v Newberry
(1871-72) L.R. 7 Q.B. 31
QB
Charing Cross Electricity Supply Co v Hydraulic Power Co
[1914] 3 K.B. 772
CA
Rickards v Lothian
[1913] A.C. 263
PC (Aus)
Ribee v Norrie
(2001) 33 H.L.R. 69; [2001] P.I.Q.R. P8; [2001] L. & T.R. 23; [2000] N.P.C. 116; (2001) 81 P. & C.R. DG18;
Times, November 22, 2000; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Box v Jubb
(1878-79) L.R. 4 Ex. D. 76
Exchequer Div
Jefferson v Derbyshire Farmers Ltd
[1921] 2 K.B. 281
CA
Boxes Ltd v British Waterways Board
[1970] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 434
QBD
New Moss Colliery Ltd v Manchester Corp
[1906] 1 Ch. 278
Ch D
Marshall & Son v Russian Oil Products Ltd
1938 S.C. 773; 1938 S.L.T. 604
IH (2 Div)
Tenant v Goldwin
92 E.R. 222; (1704) 2 Ld. Raym. 1089
KB
Rouse v Gravelworks Ltd
[1940] 1 K.B. 489
CA
Rands v McNeil
[1955] 1 Q.B. 253; [1954] 3 W.L.R. 905; [1954] 3 All E.R. 593; (1954) 98 S.J. 851
CA
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 29
Cox v Burbidge
143 E.R. 171; (1863) 13 C.B. N.S. 430
CCP
Smith v London & South Western Railway Co
(1870-71) L.R. 6 C.P. 14
Ex Chamber
McQueen v Glasgow Garden Festival (1988) Ltd
1995 S.L.T. 211
OH
Carstairs v Taylor
(1870-71) L.R. 6 Ex. 217
Ex Ct
Palmer v Bowman
[2000] 1 W.L.R. 842; [2000] 1 All E.R. 22; (1999) 96(41) L.S.G. 35; (1999) 96(41) L.S.G. 37; (1999) 143
S.J.L.B. 247; [1999] N.P.C. 122; (2000) 79 P. & C.R. D13; Times, November 10, 1999; Independent, November
29, 1999; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
Hanley v Edinburgh City Council
1912 S.C. 1199; 1912 2 S.L.T. 235
IH (2 Div)
Slater v A&J McLellan (A Firm)
1924 S.C. 854; 1924 S.L.T. 634
IH (1 Div)
Crow v Wood
[1971] 1 Q.B. 77; [1970] 3 W.L.R. 516; [1970] 3 All E.R. 425; (1970) 21 P. & C.R. 929; (1970) 114 S.J. 474
CA (Civ Div)
Attorney General v Cory Bros & Co Ltd (No.1)
[1921] 1 A.C. 521
HL
Dunn v Birmingham Canal Navigation Co Proprietors
(1871-72) L.R. 7 Q.B. 244
QB
Firth v Bowling Iron Co
(1877-78) L.R. 3 C.P.D. 254
CPD
Day & Sons v Thames Water Authority
(1984) 48 P. & C.R. 323; (1984) 270 E.G. 1294; [1984] R.V.R. 216
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 30
Lands Tr
Chichester Corp v Foster
[1906] 1 K.B. 167
KBD
Evans v Liverpool Corp
[1906] 1 K.B. 160
KBD
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound)
[1961] A.C. 388; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 126; [1961] 1 All E.R. 404; [1961] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 1; 100 A.L.R.2d 928; 1961
A.M.C. 962; (1961) 105 S.J. 85
PC (Aus)
Sanderson v Berwick upon Tweed Corp
(1883-84) L.R. 13 Q.B.D. 547
CA
West v Bristol Tramways Co
[1908] 2 K.B. 14
CA
Essa v Laing Ltd
[2004] EWCA Civ 2; [2004] I.C.R. 746; [2004] I.R.L.R. 313; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 146; Times, January 29, 2004;
Independent, January 23, 2004; Official Transcript
CA (Civ Div)
May v Burdett
115 E.R. 1213; (1846) 9 Q.B. 101
KB
X (Minors) v Bedfordshire CC
[1995] 2 A.C. 633; [1995] 3 W.L.R. 152; [1995] 3 All E.R. 353; [1995] 2 F.L.R. 276; [1995] 3 F.C.R. 337; 94
L.G.R. 313; (1995) 7 Admin. L.R. 705; [1995] Fam. Law 537; (1996) 160 L.G. Rev. 123; (1996) 160 L.G. Rev.
103; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 993; Times, June 30, 1995; Independent, June 30, 1995
HL
Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callagan (Trustees for St Joseph's Society for Foreign Missions)
[1940] A.C. 880; [1940] 3 All E.R. 349
HL
Evans v Manchester, Sheffield & Lincolnshire Railway Co
(1887) L.R. 36 Ch. D. 626
Ch D
Brackenborough v Spalding Urban DC
[1942] A.C. 310
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 31
HL
Solomons v R Gertzenstein Ltd
[1954] 1 Q.B. 565; [1954] 2 W.L.R. 823; [1954] 1 All E.R. 1008; (1954) 98 S.J. 270
QBD
Hussain v Lancaster City Council
[2000] Q.B. 1; [1999] 2 W.L.R. 1142; [1999] 4 All E.R. 125; [1998] E.H.L.R. 166; (1999) 31 H.L.R. 164;
(1999) 1 L.G.L.R. 37; (1999) 77 P. & C.R. 89; [1998] E.G. 86 (C.S.); (1998) 95(23) L.S.G. 27; (1998) 142
S.J.L.B. 173; [1998] N.P.C. 85; (1998) 76 P. & C.R. D31; Times, May 26, 1998; Independent, May 19, 1998
CA (Civ Div)
Penn v Gatenex Co
[1958] 2 Q.B. 210; [1958] 2 W.L.R. 606; [1958] 1 All E.R. 712; (1958) 102 S.J. 250
CA
H&N Emanuel v Greater London Council
[1971] 2 All E.R. 835; [1971] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 36; 69 L.G.R. 346; (1971) 115 S.J. 226
CA (Civ Div)
Clift v Welsh Office
[1999] 1 W.L.R. 796; [1998] 4 All E.R. 852; (1999) 78 P. & C.R. 32; [1998] R.V.R. 303; (1998) 95(36) L.S.G.
31; (1998) 76 P. & C.R. D46; Times, August 24, 1998; Independent, July 29, 1998
CA (Civ Div)
Musgrove v Pandelis
[1919] 2 K.B. 43
CA
Hammack v White
142 E.R. 926; (1862) 11 C.B. N.S. 588
CCP
Searle v Wallbank
[1947] A.C. 341; [1947] 1 All E.R. 12; 63 T.L.R. 24; [1947] L.J.R. 258; 176 L.T. 104; (1947) 91 S.J. 83
HL
Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd
[1945] K.B. 216
CA
Musgrove v Pandelis
[1919] 1 K.B. 314
KBD
Lloyde v West Midlands Gas Board
[1971] 1 W.L.R. 749; [1971] 2 All E.R. 1240; (1971) 115 S.J. 227
CA (Civ Div)
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Whitmores (Edenbridge) Ltd v Stanford
[1909] 1 Ch. 427
Ch D
Ross v Fedden
(1871-72) L.R. 7 Q.B. 661
QB
Hayn Roman & Co v Culliford
(1877-78) L.R. 3 C.P.D. 410
CPD
Biffa Waste Services Ltd v Maschinenfabrik Ernst Hese GmbH
[2008] EWHC 6 (TCC); [2008] B.L.R. 155; 118 Con. L.R. 104; [2008] P.N.L.R. 17; Official Transcript
QBD (TCC)
Bowden v South West Water Services Ltd
[1999] 3 C.M.L.R. 180; [1999] Eu. L.R. 573; [1999] Env. L.R. 438
CA (Civ Div)
Davey v Harrow Corp
[1958] 1 Q.B. 60; [1957] 2 W.L.R. 941; [1957] 2 All E.R. 305; (1957) 101 S.J. 405
CA
Geddis v Bann Reservoir Proprietors
(1877-78) L.R. 3 App. Cas. 430
HL (UK-Irl)
Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre (Birmingham) Ltd
[1943] K.B. 73
CA
Langbrook Properties v Surrey CC
[1970] 1 W.L.R. 161; [1969] 3 All E.R. 1424; 68 L.G.R. 268; (1969) 113 S.J. 983
Ch D
Cattle v Stockton Waterworks Co
(1874-75) L.R. 10 Q.B. 453; [1874-80] All E.R. Rep. 492
QBD
Powell v Fall
(1879-80) L.R. 5 Q.B.D. 597
CA
J&J Makin Ltd v London and North Eastern Railway Co
[1943] K.B. 467; [1943] 1 All E.R. 645
CA
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 32
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 33
Long v Hepworth
[1968] 1 W.L.R. 1299; [1968] 3 All E.R. 248; (1968) 112 S.J. 485
QBD
Collingwood v Home & Colonial Stores Ltd
[1936] 3 All E.R. 200; (1936) 56 Ll. L. Rep. 105
CA
Darley Main Colliery Co v Mitchell
(1886) L.R. 11 App. Cas. 127
HL
XvA
[2000] 1 All E.R. 490; [2000] Env. L.R. 104; [2000] 1 E.G.L.R. 19; [2000] 01 E.G. 94; [2000] W.T.L.R. 11;
(1999) 96(39) L.S.G. 38; Times, October 6, 1999; Official Transcript
Ch D
Mundy v Duke of Rutland
(1883) L.R. 23 Ch. D. 81
CA
Glasgow Corp v Muir
1941 S.L.T. 163
OH
Love v Bell
(1883-84) L.R. 9 App. Cas. 286
HL
Leakey v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty
[1978] Q.B. 849; [1978] 2 W.L.R. 774; [1978] 3 All E.R. 234; 76 L.G.R. 488; (1978) 122 S.J. 231
QBD
Mason v Levy Auto Parts of England Ltd
[1967] 2 Q.B. 530; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 1384; [1967] 2 All E.R. 62; [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 372; (1967) 111 S.J. 234
Assizes (Winchester)
Tarry v Ashton
(1875-76) L.R. 1 Q.B.D. 314
QBD
La Societe Anonyme de Remorquage a Helice v Bennetts
[1911] 1 K.B. 243
KBD
Journal Articles
Foot and mouth: economic loss
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 34
Duty of care, Economic loss, Farming, Foot and mouth disease, Infectious disease control, Private nuisance,
Proximity, Rylands v Fletcher liability
Env. L.M. 2009, May, 1-2
Update: agriculture (May)
Cattle, Compensation, Economic loss, Farming, Implied promises, Infectious disease control, Intestacy, Livestock, Market value, Proprietary estoppel, Reliance, Valuation
S.J. 2009, 153(20), 25-26
More than a nuisance: personal injury under Rylands
Consequential loss, Damages, Loss of amenity, Personal injury claims, Rylands v Fletcher liability
S.J. 2009, 153(15) Supp (Personal Injury Focus), 11-12
Public nuisance in the environmental context
Criminal liability, Environmental liability, Environmental offences, Public nuisance, Statutory nuisance, Tortious liability
J.P.L. 2008, 11, 1526-1546
The long-term stewardship of carbon dioxide storage sites - who pays, for what and how?
Carbon capture and storage, Decommissioning, EC law, Emissions trading, Environmental liability
E.L.M. 2008, 20(3), 127-132
Rights, reductionism and tort law
Human rights, Jurisprudence, Torts
O.J.L.S. 2008, 28(2), 393-407
As the flood water recedes who pays for the damage?
Causation, Damage to property, Duty of care, Flood risk, Floods, Foreseeability, Land drainage, Neighbouring
land, Nuisance, Professional liability, Protection of property, Remedies, Sewerage undertakers
S.J. 2008, 152(28), 12,14
A renaissance in public nuisance?
Contaminated land, Damages, Personal injury claims, Public nuisance
P.L.J. 2008, 213, 22-24
Personal injury update (July)
Contaminated land, Control, Damages, Employers' liability, Personal injury, Public nuisance, Third parties,
Work equipment
N.L.J. 2008, 158(7328), 964-965
Get to the bottom of it
Appropriate persons, Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Environmental remediation
E.G. 2008, 0807, 138-139
Ordeal by water and fire
Fire, Floods, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability
S.J. 2007, 151(24), 796-797
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 35
The widening gap in cover for environmental liabilities in public liability policies
Clean-up costs, Environmental liability, Environmental remediation, Insurance policies, Public liability insurance, Water pollution
J.P.L. 2007, Jun, 816-825
Too high a burden of proof?
Animals, Burden of proof, Personal injury, Strict liability
P.I.L.J. 2006, 51(Dec/Jan), 13-14
Deconstructing the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.
Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
J. Env. L. 2006, 18(3), 423-442
Liability for the escape of genetically modified organisms.
Farming, Genetically modified organisms, Germany, Member States, Private nuisance, Product contamination,
Rylands v Fletcher liability
Farm Law 2005, 114, 15-20
Escape in consequence of non-natural use of land: statutory regulation, insurance considerations and
"higher" duties of care.
Escape, Fire, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability
Build. L.M. 2005, Nov, 5-9
Civil claims for pollution.
Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability
E.I.B. 2005, 154, 8-10
Opening the floodgates to stop the fire?
Fire, Land use, Negligence, Packaging, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
N.L.J. 2005, 155(7200), 1720-1721
The distinctiveness of Rylands v Fletcher.
Foreseeability, Negligence, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability
L.Q.R. 2005, 121(Jul), 421-451
Rylands v Fletcher limps on: Transco plc v Stockport M.B.C. in the House of Lords.
Duty of care, Hazardous pursuits, Ireland, Limit of liability, Limitations, Personal injury, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Standard of care, Strict liability
I.P.E.L.J. 2004, 11(4), 158-163
Drains, planes and heavy metal: a new era for the tort of nuisance?
Liabilities, Nuisance, Public authorities, Remedies, Right to respect for private and family life
L.S. & P. 2004, 2(2/3), 163-181
Viewpoint: public participation and environmental law: the role of the courts and the proposal for an environmental tribunal.
EC law, Environmental protection, Science, Tribunals
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 36
L.S. & P. 2004, 2(2/3), 115-122
Taking the middle ground.
Australia, Rylands v Fletcher liability, United States, User
L. Ex. 2004, Nov, 32-33
Civil liability for GM farming: GM crops and the existing law: Part 2.
Corporate liability, Farmers, Genetically modified organisms, Negligence, Nuisance, Reasonableness, Reputation, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Statutory authority, Strict liability, Tortious liability
Env. Liability 2004, 12(5), 185-195
The cherries on the cake.
Commission, Consent, Estate agents, Professional liability, Property misdescriptions, Residential tenancies, Restrictive covenants, Rylands v Fletcher liability
E.G. 2004, 0451, 86-87
Fireworks: the Fireworks Act 2003.
Anti social behaviour, Consumer protection, Fireworks, Offences
Crim. Law. 2004, 145, 6-8
Environmental claims and personal injury - an overview.
Causation, Causes of action, Civil evidence, Duty of care, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Negligence,
Personal injury
J.P.I. Law 2004, 2, 111-119
Holding back the tide of negligence: Rylands resurgent.
Foreseeability, Insurance, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water
supply
Conv. 2004, May/Jun, 240-251
The long arm of environmental law.
Environmental liability, Pollution
E.G. 2004, 0420, 162-163
Rylands v Fletcher restated - the House of Lords' decision in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.
Environmental liability, Environmental remediation, Foreseeability, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution, Water supply
E.L.M. 2004, 15(6), 367-369
Current topics (April).
Damage to property, Floods, Planning obligations, Planning permission, Private nuisance, Right to respect for
home, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Sewerage undertakers, Utilities
J.P.L. 2004, Apr, 373-378
The scope of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.
Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supply
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 37
Build. L.M. 2004, Dec/Jan, 4-11
The rule in Rylands and Fletcher reconsidered.
Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water
supply
Env. Liability 2003, 11(6), 239-241
Transco ruling refines test for strict liability.
Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supply
E.I.B. 2004, 136, 6
Health and safety.
Foreseeability, Land use, Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water
supply
C. McK. Env. L.B. 2004, Jan, 53-54
Property law update (February).
Completion, Contract for sale of land, Deposits, Forfeiture, Natural user, Real property
N.L.J. 2004, 154(7117), 309-310
Problems of liability for historical land contamination under Irish law.
Contaminated land, Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Ireland, Nuisance
I.P.E.L.J. 2003, 10(4), 112-118
Liability insurance: the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.
Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supply
Ins. L.M. 2004, Feb, 10-12
Exceptionally dangerous.
Local authorities powers and duties, Risk, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supply
E.G. 2004, 0402, 91
Rylands v Fletcher.
Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water supply
Env. L.M. 2003, 12(12), 7-11
House of Lords rules on strict liability.
Foreseeability, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supply
ENDS 2003, 347, 65-66
New Zealand - sale of goods - statutory implied warrant - whether purpose for which water purchased
must have been communicated to seller.
Crops, Foreseeability, Herbicides, Implied terms, New Zealand, Sale of goods, Water supply
C.L.B. 2000, 26(2), 867-868
Rylands v Fletcher re-stated.
Local authorities powers and duties, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water supply
S.J. 2003, 147(47), 1413-1414
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
Page 38
Legal liability for GM crops.
Consumer safety, Crops, Environmental health, Genetically modified organisms, Negligence, Nuisance, Strict liability
Farm Law 2003, 87, 23-28
Environment: radioactive pollution.
Contaminated land, Damage to property, Economic loss, Measure of damages, Radioactive substances
P.L.B. 1997, 17(8), 58-59
Environmental law: notions of strict liability.
Environmental liability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability, Water pollution
J.B.L. 1995, Jan, 93-101
The return of Rylands v Fletcher.
Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
L.Q.R. 1994, 110(Oct), 506-509
Requiem for Rylands v Fletcher.
Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
Conv. 1994, Jul/Aug, 309-316
Australia - negligence: acts of independent contractor.
Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
I.C.C.L.R. 1994, 5(7), C134-135
Scope of Rylands v Fletcher is reduced.
Negligence, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
Post Mag. 2005, Nov 24, 27
Who will the courts find liable for spread of fire?
Foreseeability, Negligence, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
L.L.I.D. 2005, Oct 28, 5
Australia - strict liability/negligence: Rylands v Fletcher.
Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
Int. I.L.R. 1994, 2(6), G87-88
The return of Rylands v Fletcher.
Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
L.Q.R. 1994, 110(Apr), 185-187
Who says ignorance is no excuse?
Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
P.E.L.B. 1994, 3(7), 56
Environmental: Rylands v Fletcher - foreseeability of harm.
Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
I.C.C.L.R. 1994, 5(2), C42-43
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
1868 WL 9885
(1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330 (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330
No liability for historic pollution.
Environmental liability, Foreseeability, Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
P.L.B. 1994, 14(7), 49,53
Lords judgement limits ruling scope.
Intention, Land use, Rylands v Fletcher liability
Post Mag. 2003, Dec 4, 29
Groundwater pollution and strict liability at common law under Rylands v Fletcher.
Environmental liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Water pollution
Conv. 1992, Nov-Dec, 451-457
Project financing and the environment: lender liability for environmental damage in Australia.
Australia, Environmental liability, Lender liability, Project finance
J.I.B.L. 1996, 11(1), 7-17
The rule in Rylands v Fletcher revised in Australia.
Australia, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Rylands v Fletcher liability, Strict liability
Int. I.L.R. 1994, 2(10), 390-392
Australia: strict liability/negligence: Rylands v Fletcher.
Australia, Dangerous escape, Negligence, Occupiers liability, Strict liability
Int. I.L.R. 1994, 2(6), Supp G87-88
END OF DOCUMENT
© 2010 Thomson Reuters.
Page 39