Can scientists make a space elevator?

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/11/05/space.elevator/index.html?iref=allsearch
Can scientists make a space elevator? - CNN.com
By Doug Gross , CNN
November 5, 2009 -- Updated 1529 GMT (2329 HKT)
CNN.com
Can scientists make a space elevator?
This concept
image from
NASA shows
what a space
elevator and
transfer station
could look like.
"The question
Artsutanov
asked himself
had the childlike
brilliance of true
genius. A
merely clever
man could never
have thought of
it -- or would
have dismissed
it instantly as
absurd. If the
laws of celestial mechanics make it possible for an object to stay fixed in the sky, might it not be possible to lower a
cable down to the surface, and so to establish an elevator system linking earth to space?" -- Arthur C. Clarke, 1979,
"The Fountains of Paradise"
(CNN) -- It sounds like science fiction. And it was.
Now, 30 years after "2001" author Arthur C. Clarke wrote about an elevator that rises into outer space, serious
research is happening all over the world in an effort to make the far-fetched-sounding idea a reality.
The benefits of a fully realized elevator would make carrying people and goods into space cheaper, easier and safer
than with rocket launches, proponents say, opening up a host of possibilities.
Restaurants and hotels for space tourists. Wind turbines that provide energy by spinning 24 hours a day. A cheaper,
easier and more environmentally friendly way to launch rockets.
Scientists envision all of the above -- possibly within our lifetimes.
"Space elevator-related research is valid, but there are hurdles to overcome," said David Smitherman, a space
architect at NASA's George C. Marshall Space Flight Center.
This week in the Mojave Desert, three teams of engineers are competing for $2 million offered up by NASA for
anyone who can build a prototype of an elevator able to crawl up a kilometer-high tether while hauling a heavy
payload.
"We haven't had any winners yet, but we truly do expect to have at least one winner, probably more [this year]," said
Ted Semon, spokesman for The Spaceward Foundation, which has run the competition for the past several years.
Most models for an elevator into space involve attaching a cable from a satellite, space station or other
Page 1 of 3
14/05/2012 05:02 AM
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/11/05/space.elevator/index.html?iref=allsearch
counterweight to a base on Earth's surface.
Scientists say inertia would keep the cable tight enough to allow an elevator to climb it.
The inspiration for researchers to pursue a space elevator started, as many scientific advances have, in the fantastical
world of science fiction.
In Clarke's 1979 novel "The Fountains of Paradise," he writes about a scientist battling technological, political and
ethical difficulties involved in creating a space elevator.
In the years that followed, Clarke, who died last year, remained an outspoken advocate for researching and funding
the elevator.
Others are now carrying the torch.
"Space elevator research is important because it is a way to build a bridge to space instead of ferrying everything by
rocket," said Smitherman, who has conducted research and published findings on the effort.
"Look at the cost and efficiency of a bridge versus a ferry on Earth and then look at the cost and inefficiency of the
rocket ferries we use today and you will see why so many people are looking for a 'bridge' solution like the space
elevator."
Microsoft is among the sponsors an annual space elevator conference, and teams in Japan and Russia are among
those working to turn the theory into reality -- even if they all admit they have a long way to go.
Even the most avid proponents of the research admit there are big hurdles that need to be overcome.
The first, scientists say, is that there's currently not a viable material strong enough to make the cables that will
support heavy loads of passengers or cargo into orbit. According to NASA research, the space elevator cable would
need to be about 22,000 miles long. That's how far away a satellite must be to maintain orbit above a fixed spot on
the Earth's equator.
"Right now, if you use the strongest material in the world, the weight of the tether would be so much that it would
actually snap," said Semon, a retired software engineer. He said the super-light material would probably need to be
about 25 times stronger than what's now commercially available.
In a separate competition, his group offers a prize to any team that can build a tether that's at least twice as strong as
what's currently on the market.
Another issue, scientists say, is how to keep the cable, or the elevator itself, from getting clobbered by meteorites or
space junk floating around in space. Some suggest a massive cleanup of Earth's near orbit would be required.
And then there's the cost. Estimates are as high as $20 billion for a working system that would stretch into orbit.
Many think it would be private enterprise, not a government, that would spring for the earliest versions of the
elevator.
Professor Brendan Quine and his team at York University in Toronto, Canada, think they have the answers to at least
some of those problems.
They've built a three-story high prototype of an elevator tower that would rise roughly 13 miles (20 kilometers) -high enough to escape most of the earth's atmosphere.
"At 20 kilometers, you still have gravity; you're not in orbit," Quine said. "But for a tourist, you can see basically the
same things an astronaut sees -- the blackness of space, the horizon of the Earth."
Page 2 of 3
14/05/2012 05:02 AM
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/11/05/space.elevator/index.html?iref=allsearch
In the stratosphere, the tower also could potentially be used to launch rockets, he said. The most expensive and
energy-sucking part of any space launch now is blasting from the ground out of the atmosphere.
Constructed from Kevlar, the free-standing structure would use pneumatically inflated sections pressurized with a
lightweight gas, such as hydrogen or helium, to actively stabilize itself and allow for flexibility. A series of platforms
or pods, supported by the elevator, would be used to launch payloads into Earth's orbit.
Quine acknowledged that the prototype is just a first step toward realizing the elevator and that several more
prototypes are needed to fine-tune details.
He estimated that the cost of the basic tower would be about $2 billion -- the equivalent of a massive skyscraper in
places like New York -- and that the technology to build it could be ready in less than 10 years.
He said a more advanced -- and expensive -- elevator tower could be built to go higher into the stratosphere.
But for the purposes of actually ferrying everyday people into space, 20 kilometers makes the most sense, Quine
said.
"The tower might be economically viable if you're able to transport 1,000 people a day to the to of it for about
$1,000 a ticket," he said. "At the top, you'd probably want amenities -- hotels, restaurants. It could be a very pleasant
experience, in contrast to zero gravity, which makes many people sick."
For now, advocates of making the elevator a reality say they'll keep at it. They'll continue reminding themselves that
they wouldn't be the first to turn what started as an outlandish idea into good science.
"Every revolutionary idea seems to evoke three stages of reaction," Clarke once said. "They may be summed up by
the phrases: One, it's completely impossible. Two, it's possible, but it's not worth doing. Three, I said it was a good
idea all along."
© 2011 Cable News Network. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Page 3 of 3
14/05/2012 05:02 AM