CHARUSAT JOURNAL
Paper Number:
Title of the Paper
Author's Surname Name1,*, Co-Author's Surname Name2
2
1
Author's Affiliation (Name of institution, City, Country)
Co-Author's Affiliation (Name of institution, City, Country)
Abstract: The Abstract should not exceed 200 words. The Abstract should state the principal objectives and the scope
of the investigation, as well as the methodology employed. It should summarize the results and state the principal
conclusions. An effective abstract stands on its own — it can be understood fully even when made available without the
full paper. To this end, avoid referring to figures or the bibliography in the abstract. Please introduce any acronyms the
first time you use them in the abstract (if needed), and do so again in the full paper. About 4 to 6 significant key words
should follow the abstract to aid indexing.
Keywords: Keyword, Keyword, Keyword, Keyword, Keyword Point
INTRODUCTION
An Introduction should provide a review of the recent
literature on the topic and sufficient background
information to allow the results of the article to be
understood and evaluated.
In the Introduction section, state the motivation for the
work presented in your paper and prepare readers for the
structure of the paper. Write four components, preferably
(but not necessarily) in four paragraphs: context, need,
task, and objective of the article. References to literature
in the body of the manuscript are cited by author(s),
followed by year depend up on how the sentence is
developed (Smith, 1993). In case of more references,
each reference is to be separated by semicolon (Smith,
1993; Rao and Ram, 2011; Ram et al. (2008)).
Alternatively citation can be written as: Smith (1993) has
developed the new method of extraction of nickel from
ore.
You may organize the body of your paper into
subsections or sub-subsections; however, remember to
prepare your readers for the structure ahead at all levels.
Scientific papers should report significant and innovative
results and exhibit a high level of originality and limited
to a maximum size of 4000 words. Review articles are in
the form of systematic reviews and literature reviews and
are a form of secondary literature with a limitation of
5000 words. Systematic reviews determine an objective
list of criteria and find all previously published original
experimental papers that meet the criteria. They then
compare the results presented in these papers with
proposed innovative or novel findings. Short scientific
papers are generally have the same structure as longer
scientific papers but are shorter (max 2500 words) and
report on a significant, but limited, aspect of research
work meriting a separate publication.
Instrumentation Details
The Methods section details the theoretical or
experimental methods used. What justifies using a given
method? What is special, unexpected, or different in
your approach? If you use a standard or usual procedure,
mention that upfront, too.
The SI system of units for nomenclature, symbols and
abbreviations should be followed closely. Symbols for
physical quantities in the text should be written in italics
(e.g. v, T, n, etc.). Vectors and matrix should be written
in bold. See Eq. (2). Symbols for units that consist of
letters should be in plain text (e.g. ms-1, K, min, mm,
etc.).
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
RESULTS
The Experimental section should provide details of the
experimental set-up and the methods used to obtain the
results. To make this section interesting, explain the
choices you made in your experimental procedure. This
section should provide sufficient detail for other
scientists to be able to reproduce the experiments
presented in this paper. The Methods and Experimental
part may be combined.
The results section should clearly and concisely present
the data, using figures and tables where appropriate.
State the message of each paragraph upfront: Convey in
the first sentence what you want readers to remember
from the paragraph as a whole. Focus on what happened.
Then develop your message in the remainder of the
paragraph, including only that information (figures and
tables) you think you need to convince your audience.
Subtitle 1
Figures and tables must be cited in consecutive
numerical order and referred in the text as Fig.1 or Table
2 etc. Figures and Tables should be inserted at the exact
positions where they belong in the body of the paper.
METHODS
*
Corresponding Author's Address: Name of institution, Address, City, Country, aaaa@xxxxxx.com
1
Table numbers and titles should be placed at the top left
of the Tables and Figure numbers and titles should be
placed at the bottom left of the Figure.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Acknowledgement (optional) of collaboration
preparation assistance may be included.
or
Table 1. Table title
NOMENCLATURES
LDF
Real quantity
Number of
true positives
Number of
false positives
Line
defects
70
Point
defects
210
55
213
19
1
Precision
[%]
92.7
Nomenclature (optional). Papers with many symbols
should include a nomenclature that defines all symbols
with units, inserted above the references. If one is used,
it must contain all the symbols used in the manuscript
and the definitions should not be repeated in the text.
vi
tmax
T0
[ms-1]
[min]
[K]
velocity in ith position
maximal time limit
initial temp
REFERENCES
All literature mentioned in the text should be listed in
alphabetical and chronological order at the end of the
paper under References. Only cited text references are to
be included as per the format given in the “Instruction to
Authors”. All references must be complete and accurate.
Fig. 1. Fuzzy set integration
Equations
Equations should be numbered in consecutive numerical
order with the use of brackets in the text and referred in
the text as Eq. (1), Eq. (2), etc.
f ( x)  arg max F  x, y  ,
(1)
yY
1 0 367 
T  0 1
0  .
0 0
1 
Ram, R.and Peter, K. (2005) ‘Risk assessment of
Australian domestic violence’, The Australian Feminist
Law Journal, vol. 5, August, pp. 100-105.
Ram, R., Krishna, S. and Peter, K. (2005a) ‘Differential
rectification using control points’, International Journal
of Geoscience and Remote sensing, vol. 3, August, pp.
10-18.
(2)
DISCUSSION
The Discussion section that should describe the
relationships and generalizations shown by the results
and discuss the significance of the results, making
comparisons with previously published work. If
required, the Results and Discussion can be combined
into a single section to improve clarity.
CONCLUSIONS
A Conclusions section should present one or more
conclusions drawn from the results and subsequent
discussion. It should state the most important outcome of
your work. This should not duplicate the Abstract. You
may also consider including perspectives - that is, an
idea of what could or should still be done in relation to
the issue addressed in the paper.
2
Journal article
Muller, V. (1994) ‘Trapped in the body: Transsexualism,
the law, sexual identity’, The Australian Feminist Law
Journal, vol. 3, August, pp. 103-107.
Ram, R., Krishna, S. and Peter, K. (2005b) ‘Differential
rectification using multiple control points’, IEEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, vol. 4,
August, pp. 203-215.
Journal article from CD-ROM, electronic database,
or journal
Skargren, E.I. and Oberg, B. (1998) ‘Predictive factors
for 1-year outcome of low-back and neck pain in patients
treated in primary care: Comparison between the
treatment strategies chiropractic and physiotherapy’,
Pain [Electronic], vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 201-208, Available:
Elsevier/ScienceDirect/ O304-3959(98)00101-8, [8 Feb
1999].
Book with two authors
McCarthy, P. and Hatcher, C. (1996) Speaking
persuasively: Making the most of your presentations,
Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Book with three or more authors
Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (1991) Getting to yes:
Negotiating an agreement without giving in, 2nd edition,
London: Century Business
Book with an editor
Danaher, P. (ed.) (1998) Beyond the ferris wheel,
Rockhampton: CQU Press.
Chapter in a book written by someone other than the
editor
Byrne, J. (1995) ‘Disabilities in tertiary education’, in
Rowan, L. and McNamee, J. (ed.) Voices of a Margin,
Rockhampton: CQU Press.
World Wide Web page
Young, C. (2001) English Heritage position statement
on the Valletta Convention, [Online], Available:
http://www.archaeol.freeuk.com/EHPostionStatement.ht
m [24 Aug 2001].
World Wide Web page Without Authors
General Format for Writing a Scientific Paper (2015).
Available:
http://www.instruction.greenriver.edu/mcvay/b100/gener
al_format_for_writing_a_sci.htm (October 05, 2015)
Citation: (General Format, 2015)
Conferences
Robert, R. and Smith, J. K. (2003) ‘Probability
Assessment of Project Risks Using Fuzzy - Fault Tree
Approach’, Proceedings of International Conference on
Construction Management and Materials (ICCMM), IIT,
Kharagpur, pp. 100-105.
PhD Thesis
Mack, S. (2000) ‘Desperate Optimism’, PhD Thesis,
University of Calgary, Canada.
3