University of South Carolina Upstate English 101 Composition I Spring 2011 Instructor’s Name: Lisa Richie Course Section & Meeting Times: Tuesday/Thursday – 4:00 – 5:15 p.m. Office Location & Hours: B132 – 8:30 – 9:30 a.m. daily and by appointment Office Phone: 864-582-4347, ext. 2132 E-mail address: lrichie@uscupstate.edu Course Description English 101 provides instruction and practice in academic writing, critical reading, and research. Attention is given to planning, drafting, revising, and editing a variety of texts. Course Objectives: Students will Practice strategies to develop a multi-stage process of writing, a sequence of invention, organization, drafting, revision, and editing to produce focused, clear, polished essays Read to understand what an author says and to determine how the author shapes his or her ideas, identifying rhetorical strategies appropriate to various genres and distinguishing between the conventions of private and public writing Learn critical reading skills to understand and respond to texts and to develop personal insights and thoughtful ideas for their own writing Engage the skills of annotating, summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting texts in order to represent them accurately in their own writing Write logical, organized academic essays developing a thesis in a manner that an audience will find convincing Develop strategies for locating and assessing relevant, credible sources Research a topic, locate and use source material to generate ideas for their own writing, support their ideas as they write, integrate and clearly attribute source material, and document sources accurately using current MLA format Manage language appropriately and with skill: occasional mistakes in grammar and punctuation may occur, but essays are free from patterns of errors Required Texts Bullock, Richard, Maureen Daly Goggin, and Francine Weinberg. The Norton Field Guide to Writing. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010. Print. Graff, Gerald. They Say, I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. New York: W.W. Norton, 2010. Print. Skloot, Rebecca. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown, 2010. Print. Additional reading assigned by instructor available on Blackboard or as class handouts. Blackboard access is required. Assignments Quizzes (10% total) Attendance and participation (10%) Timed Writings (10%) Summary and analysis (10%) Cultural event description one (5%) Cultural event description two (5%) Popular culture textual analysis (20%) Research paper (25%) Final portfolio and reflection (5%) English 101 Syllabus End of Semester Grading A 90-100 B+ 87-89 B 80-86 C+ 77-79 C 70-76 D+ 67-69 D 60-66 F 0-59 1 Scope and Nature of Class Work Assignments will include the following: critical thinking - asking questions, defining problems, examining evidence, analyzing assumptions and biases, avoiding emotional reasoning, avoiding oversimplification, considering other interpretations, and tolerating ambiguity. Adapted from C. Wade, “Using Writing to Develop and Assess Critical Thinking.” Teaching of Psychology 22.1 (1995): 24-28. strategic reading - locating the key points of an essay, comprehending or inferring main ideas or themes, recognizing particular rhetorical patterns, and identifying unfamiliar vocabulary informal writing - journaling, taking class notes, responding to ideas or readings, drafting, reviewing cultural events formal writing - composing four or more essays, averaging four pages each, which undergo a process of revision. At least two essays will incorporate research. Overall writing, including both formal and informal writing, will include a minimum of 10,000 words or thirty pages (330 words/page). research - participating in the iPod library tour and required library training sessions; locating a variety of sources through the USC Upstate library; accessing electronic sources using USC Upstate databases; researching, drafting and documenting an essay; and citing sources carefully and correctly portfolio building - collecting and reflecting on drafts, revisions, and final essays in a folder or notebook cultural event critiques - attending and reviewing two cultural events as directed by your instructor. demonstrating progress as a cohort - writing a diagnostic essay, reading texts in common with other 101 classes, and attending cultural events. conferences - meeting with your instructor on a one-to-one basis for writing instruction. At least one conference is required. Attendance & Punctuality Due to the participatory nature of this class, students are expected to attend regularly, to be on time and to remain until the class is over. Circumstances may occasionally arise which might cause you to miss class, but excessive absences, tardiness, and/or occasions of leaving class early will have a negative impact on your final course grade. Two absences are allowed; further absences will have a negative effect on your grade. After the second absence, each addition absence will result in a final average penalty of three points. (Two tardies and/or two occasions of leaving class early will count as one absence.) In case of an absence, you are responsible for determining from another student what went on in class and any assignments. You may want to find out the names and phone numbers or email addresses of some of your classmates to contact if you are absent. Accommodations If you are a student with a disability and would like to request disability-related accommodations, you are encouraged to contact your instructor and the Office of Disability Services as early in the semester as possible. The Office of Disability Services is located in Suite 107 of the Campus Life Center. Their phone number is 864-503-5199. Student Conduct for the Classroom A Member of the USC Upstate Community of Scholars: Displays personal and academic integrity. You are honest, truthful, and trustworthy. You do not lie, cheat, or steal. You do not present others’ work as your own or collaborate with others without acknowledgement or permission from the faculty member. English 101 Syllabus 2 Accepts responsibility for actions. You do not blame others for academic consequences resulting from your own decisions and behavior. You follow established policies and procedures in the USC Upstate Catalog, the USC Upstate Student Handbook, and course syllabi. Respects the rights and dignity of all persons. You are courteous and respect the rights and property of others. You do not harass, demean, ridicule, abuse, threaten, or discriminate against others. Maintains a learning-focused attitude. You are engaged in the classroom and other learning environments, both on and off campus. You are on time, prepared, and alert. You participate until the faculty member in charge dismisses the class. Refrains from conduct that adversely affects others. Your conduct is appropriate for learning. You do not enter the class late or leave early without permission of the faculty member. You follow the instructions of the faculty member regarding talking or using cell phones, pagers, or other electronic devices in class. You do not use threatening, demeaning, or inflammatory language. Follows the specific requirements of faculty members. You meet the behavioral and academic expectations of your instructors recognizing that these standards will often vary. Plagiarism From USC Upstate Student Handbook, “The Academic Honor Code”: “Students are required to properly acknowledge sources as follows: students may not present as their own ideas, opinion, images, figures, languages, or concepts of another, including those of other students. Students must acknowledge all sources such as magazines, journals, internet sites, records, tapes, films, and interviews. The common specific uses of source material are Direct Quotation: Word-for-word copying of a source. A direct quotation must be accurate, must not misrepresent the source in any way, and must be properly acknowledged. Paraphrase: A recasting into one’s own words material from a source, generally condensing the source. A direct quotation with only a word or two changed, added or omitted should not be passed off as a paraphrase. A paraphrase restates the source but does not misrepresent it and must be properly acknowledged. Use of ideas: The use of an idea from a source must be properly acknowledged, even when one’s application of that idea varies from the source. Use of figures, tables, charts, statistics, images, photographs, and other similar sources: These items must be fully acknowledged and any changes must be clearly indicated. . . ...[A]ny kind of help (except that permitted by an instructor) in the preparation of a project ... must be fully acknowledged. Papers and other materials [copied or] bought from ‘term paper writing services,’ if submitted as the work of anyone except the writing service, constitute a violation of the principles of this document” (94). In addition, resubmitting work done for another instructor—either from high school or another college class— also constitutes academic dishonesty. BE AWARE: The consequences of plagiarism range from a grade change to expulsion. Students who admit responsibility for an academic integrity violation or who are found responsible through the Student Code of Conduct will receive the appropriate grade determined by the professor, which may include an X to signify academic dishonesty. Grades with an X are not subject to grade forgiveness. Sanctioned Writing Assistance The University Writing Center (HPAC 136) provides free individual tutoring in writing. Consulting a UWC tutor does not constitute plagiarism. NOTE: To improve our composition program, the English faculty read samples of essays written in English 101. All names are removed before the essays are read. If you do not want your essay used in this assessment, see the LLC administrative assistant in HPAC 222 for a nonparticipation form. English 101 Syllabus 3 Turning in Assignments via Blackboard With the exception of timed writings and short homework practice exercises, all assignments must be turned in via Blackboard. You MUST have your Blackboard login information at the beginning of the semester. Late Assignments All assignments will have deadlines which include a date and a time. Assignments turned in one minute past the required time will be considered late. PAPERS MORE THAN 24 HOURS LATE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. (The late penalty is a grade reduction of one letter grade.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A note regarding pedagogy, a fluid dynamic of teaching and learning: A curriculum is not a syllabus and a textbook; curricula are plans for interactions of learning in a communal environment. learning ENVIRONMENTS classroom library online laboratory student workspaces field locations learning RELATIONSHIPS faculty – student peer – student advanced student – student student – community member staff – student student – self learning EVENTS curricular co-curricular extra-curricular learning ACTIVITIES reading writing observation problem-solving skills practice presentation discussion exams learning RESOURCES books websites articles databases films periodicals slideshows other resources Most learning activities should feature GOALS (purposes of activities), PRACTICES (the activity itself), and OUTCOMES (results, including what is to be learned and how learning will be measured). This syllabus is tentative. The instructor reserves the right to make adjustments as necessary. Students will be notified of changes. English 101 Syllabus 4 COURSE SCHEDULE Week Readings Class Activities Purposes *Note: Due to the snow days, the reading assignments are numerous through February 1. January 11 – 13 *SNOW DAYS All 101 & 102 students meet in DHS LMC. January 19 January 20 Assignments Due Norton ch. 1-6 Immortal ch. 1-3 Pick up handouts and assignments. Books will be issued on Monday. January 24 Complete these readings by Thursday, January 27: Norton ch. 7-8, & 40 Immortal ch. 4-11 Meet in DHS LMC . January 27 See January 24 for reading assignments due today. February TSIS Prefaces, introduction, and ch. 1 1 Immortal ch. 12-16 Norton ch. 13, 54 February TSIS ch. 2 3 Immortal ch. 17-21 English 101 Syllabus Introduce course: syllabus policies; class practices; student introductions *note January 21—last day to drop without “w” Identify course expectations and activities, make us more comfortable with one another How does the author know what she knows? What conversations does the author enter? Describe literacy narratives Demonstrate active reading, annotating a text ; Discuss reading: what is the rhetorical situation? Apply course concepts to multiple texts: learn methodology and academic ways of knowing; link humanities and sciences Develop critical reading skills ; Apply course concepts to Preface text Introduce critical literacy Who is the implied “They” in the readings? Apply course concepts to text: understand implied context and audiences Practice textual analysis; apply course concepts to Peer review; What strategies does the author use to report? How are those strategies similar or different from those described in the Norton? Practice summaries with essays Annotation of essay due Feb 3 Preface text: consider various ways of reporting, especially for cultural event one due Feb. 15 Practice summary and analysis for assignment 5 Week Readings Class Activities Purposes Assignments Due February 8 TSIS ch. 3 Immortal ch. 22-26 Analyze how the author uses quotes; practice quoting the author Practice summary and analysis for assignment February 10 Immortal ch. 27-31 Peer review; discuss reading Practice collaborative learning; practice textual analysis February 15 Norton ch. 21, 23 Immortal ch. 32-35 Introduce textual analysis: thinking critical about popular culture Apply class strategies to texts of your own choosing February 17 Norton ch. 55 Library research day. We will meet at the USU Upstate library at 4:00 and will remain until 5:15. Introduce research; Practice writing thesis statements Increase ability to make use of secondary sources; emphasize focus in writing February 22 Norton ch. 24, 14 Immortal ch. 36-end Model topic proposal; continue practicing writing thesis statements Practice proposing research projects Textual analysis topic proposal due Feb 24 Norton ch. 29-30, 4344 Peer review topic proposals; Discuss heavy revisers and heavy planners; Evaluating online sources Norton ch. 25-26 Peer review; how to revise Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation; learn to rate the credibility of a source Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation Textual analysis rough draft or first two pages due Mar 1 Norton ch. 46-49; Norton ch. 27 Part 8 Handbook In-text citing and works cited in MLA style February 24 March 1 March 3 Editing workshop Learn to incorporate credible sources accurately Summary and analysis due for peer review Feb 8; revision due Feb 10 Cultural event one due Feb 15 Textual analysis draft due Mar 3 Improve our ability to recognize and correct errors March 7 Norton ch.17 & 42 Introduce final research paper and model research paper topic proposal. Discuss reading: what is the writer’s topic, argument, and point of view? March 11 NO CLASS Conferences Conferences March 15 NO CLASS Conferences Conferences Norton ch. 33-36; Practice on-line research Review topic proposals; how are these models of writing effective? Find sources online; Model Isearch paper March 17 English 101 Syllabus Practice critical reading skills. Practice proposing research projects. Textual analysis revision due at time of individual conference Increase ability to research effectively; Learn how to organize source material or reflect on research process Research paper topic proposal due March 17; Cultural event two due March 17 6 Week Readings Class Activities Purposes Assignments Due Norton ch. 62 Discuss reading; Peer review Isearch paper followed by Composition Workshop Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation I-search paper due for peer review March 22; revision due Mar 24 Norton ch. 45 & 57 Discuss reading; model research paper introductions Practice research paper introductions --introductions due April 5th (after Spring Break) Norton ch. 56, 58 Discuss reading; share introductions in peer groups. Practice research paper introductions Research paper introduction due April 5 Norton ch. 60, 63 Review research paper introductions; Discuss reading April 12 Norton ch. 59, 64 Peer review rough draft or first three pages; Discuss reading Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation; review critical reading Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation April 14 Norton ch. 61 March 22 March 24 March 29-31 — NO CLASS Spring Break April 5 April 7 Discuss organization and development: subordinate sources to the argument; Review incorporating sources Peer review research paper draft April 19 Norton ch. 28, 38 April 22 Last Day of Classes English 101 Syllabus How to compile your final paper portfolio and write the reflection; Complete course evaluation Submit final paper and reflection; Discuss course Understand that your voice matters more than those of your sources; improve citations Practice collaborative learning and peer evaluation Treat writing as both a process and a product; think about how your composition process has developed; participate in university practice of assessing instruction Research paper rough draft or first three pages due April 12 Research paper draft due April 14 Research paper revision and reflection due April 22 7 Short Assignments Cultural Event Attend a co-curricular campus event—a panel discussion, a guest speaker, a sporting event, a theatrical or musical performance, or some USC Upstate happening—and write a one page summary and analysis of it generally in line with the assignment above and below. Your summary should be sufficient to describe the event for a reader who did not attend, include who was involved and who attended; your analysis should suggest how this event fits within the mission of the university and student services as described in the Academic Catalogue 2010-11. This summary and analysis of the cultural event is worth five points, so do your best. I will evaluate your effort based on your clarity of description, quality of analysis, and sentence-level correctness. Summary and Analysis Carefully read a chapter of the Preface text and offer one paragraph each of summary and analysis, roughly half a page each, single spaced and block paragraphed, 12 pt. Times New Roman, with one inch margins. You probably should begin your descriptive summary paragraph with a one sentence account of the selection, and then identify its content and structure in an organized fashion. For both the descriptive summary and the analysis, you should incorporate textual evidence by introducing its context (where in the novel the quote appears and such), punctuating the quote correctly, restating it in your own words, and then relating its particular meaning to the point you make regarding the chapter. Your paragraph of analysis should offer some point about the meaning, consequences, subtext, tone, style, or some other matter of the chapter or essay. Proceed with a claim or set of related claims about the text, for which you should offer evidence from the text in the form of quotes. Each paragraph should feature 1-2 quotes as evidence and one or two partial quotes. You are best off making your claims specific throughout each paragraph, and only in the concluding sentence of each offering a more general point. See RW and the syllabus section on incorporating quotes for guidance. Analysis means lots of things, so let’s be clear on what it is not: - it is not simple claim of taste, whether something is good or bad (by which you really mean whether you like it or not), though you may indicate the why of such an evaluation; - it is not unsupported opinion; - it is not vague, general, or lacking evidence. See RW for guidance. Your analysis, then, should be the careful, specific, and evidenced demonstration of some particular and not obvious characteristic of the chapter: what it means, what it does, what its purpose is, who its audience is, the implied position of the author, what text it resembles, where it is especially successful, or where it fails to work well. This summary and analysis is worth ten points, so do your best. I will evaluate your effort based on the engagement and effort of your draft, clarity and quality of thought, apt selection and incorporation of quotes, and sentence-level correctness. English 101 Syllabus 8 Popular Culture Textual Analysis Your next significant writing assignment in this class requires you to select, engage critically, and analyze one or two popular works (film, song, TV episode) on a common topic involving class or work. Your paper should be four to five pages long, double spaced. The introduction should identify the topic and its relevant historical and cultural context, the text(s) you analyze, and your thesis—a small and unexpected claim worth making. The next paragraph should summarize the text(s) and incorporate evidence in the form of quotes to substantiate your summary. The bulk of the paper should develop the specifically analytical (and perhaps comparative) argument offered in your thesis, including careful evidence to support your claims. Analysis means many different things, so stay focused on demonstrating the how work or class is represented in the text(s). Finally, given the careful detail and specific, supported analysis of your essay, you have earned the right in your conclusion to offer conjecture, make more general claims, suggest what the broader implications of your analysis might be. This essay should be directed to actual and implied audiences, both your fellow students and professor as well as an imagined audience you are trying to teach with your experience or interpretation and impress with your style of description and explanation. You must craft the essay to make it meaningful and appealing to others. Format The essay must be printed in 12 point Times New Roman, double spaced with 1” margins. Your primary source or sources include the text(s) undergoing analysis; secondary sources over evidence that enhances your argument. All sources must be documented according to MLA conventions. Evaluation Your topic proposal (1 pt), initial two pages (2 pts), and draft (2 pts) will be evaluated based on the effort and engagement they demonstrate. Your revision (15 pts) will be evaluated according to the following criteria: PROCESS - The essay goes through stages of development, including a topic proposal, introductory pages, complete first draft, and a polished final revision. QUALITY OF THOUGHT and CLARITY OF PURPOSE - The essay effectively describes and analyzes a popular work and attends to context. ORGANIZATION - The essay is organized effectively and includes smooth transitions between sections and paragraphs. Paragraphs are clearly focused on one idea relevant to the essay’s thesis; the ideas within the paragraph are clearly related and smoothly linked, and the main point of the paragraph is supported by examples and details. USE OF LANGUAGE - Clarity of expression: the writing has been carefully proofread and adheres to standard conventions of grammar and punctuation; the essay presents an appropriate tone and precise diction. RESEARCH - The essay effectively and appropriately cites relevant sources using quotes that are accurately introduced, cited, and analyzed. The in-text citation and the list of works are in MLA style. English 101 Syllabus 9 Research Paper: Critical Response Your final and most important writing assignment in this class requires you to describe an issue or topic and three competing viewpoints regarding it, then support the position you find most reasonable. First, establish a topic and specific debatable issue of your interest and research it carefully. Possible topics might include health care, class in America, education policy, or any other matter of interest approved for class. Then, you should describe fairly and reasonably at least three positions on that issue and their justification. The introduction should identify the topic, its relevant context, the various perspectives available, and your thesis: a small and unexpected claim worth making. The next few paragraphs should describe more than two conflicting but reasonable positions on the topic, and you need to incorporate evidence in the form of quotes and statistics to substantiate your descriptions. The rest of the paper should demonstrate your position with respect to those you have described, offering careful evidence to support your claims. For your conclusion, you have earned the right to make more general claims, suggest what the broader implications of your analysis and position might be. This essay should be directed to actual and implied audiences, both your fellow students and professor as well as an imagined audience you are trying to teach with your experience or interpretation and impress with your style of description and explanation. You must craft the essay to make it meaningful and appealing to others. Format The essay must be 5-7 pages, printed in 12 point Times New Roman, double spaced with 1” margins. Your four+ sources must be documented according to MLA conventions both in the text and in the list of works cited. Schedule Topic proposal: it should feature a brief statement of the topic, a longer explanation of the topic, a description of three or more conflicting but reasonable perspectives regarding the topic, and a brief list of possible sources. Annotated bibliography: it should feature five or more sources cited appropriately, followed by a three to four sentence summary of the text and a descriptive and appropriate quote from the text related to the summary you write. Research paper introduction: it should be a paragraph clarifying the topic, its context, and a clear sense of the various positions, your own, and its reasoning. Draft of research paper: your best work, incorporating your research accurately and demonstrating clear purpose, successful organization, and sentence-level correctness. Research paper portfolio due, including your final revision. It should include your topic proposal, the annotated bibliography, the introduction, the draft, the peer review you wrote, and your revision. Grading criteria PROCESS - The portfolio includes the topic proposal, annotated bibliography, introduction, draft, complete first draft, and a polished final draft. QUALITY OF THOUGHT and CLARITY OF PURPOSE - The essay effectively describes multiple perspectives on a topic and demonstrates its own position. ORGANIZATION - The essay is organized effectively and includes smooth transitions between sections and paragraphs. Paragraphs are clearly focused on one idea relevant to the essay’s thesis; the ideas within the paragraph are clearly related and smoothly linked, and the main point of the paragraph is supported by examples and details. USE OF LANGUAGE - Clarity of expression: the writing has been carefully proofread and adheres to standard conventions of grammar and punctuation; the essay presents an appropriate tone and precise diction. RESEARCH - The essay effectively and appropriately cites relevant sources using quotes that are accurately introduced, cited, and analyzed. The in-text citation and the list of works are in MLA style. English 101 Syllabus 10 I-Search Assignment Description: The I-Search paper is designed to teach the writer and the reader something valuable about a chosen topic and about the nature of searching and discovery. As opposed to the standard research paper in which the writer usually assumes a detached and objective stance, the I-Search paper allows you to take an active role in your search, to hunt for facts and truths firsthand, and to provide a step-by-step record of the discovery process. For this assignment, you will write a 6-8 page paper on your topic and an additional bibliography. You must have at least six sources (more would always be good): 2 must be “print” sources, 2 must be “electronic” (databases and websites) and 2 must be “other” (interview, television, film, radio, song or other media). The “other” sources might be difficult to track down, so it’s best to start early on your research. Make sure that your sources are credible. If you are researching something that requires you include non-credible sources (for example, if you are researching Bigfoot), make sure you also cite six credible sources in addition to the non-credible ones. Topic: The cardinal rule of the I-Search paper is to choose an argument that genuinely interests you and that you want to know more about. You may want to research the arguments that surround the “Pro-Choice” position, or arguments in favor or in opposition to gay marriage. Remember: arguments are EVERYWHERE, so the topic is open. The important point is that you choose an argument that you really care about. It can be an argument that you disagree with, agree with, or are undecided about. It can be something you know a lot or a little about. Because of the nature of the I-search, you cannot simply tell me what you already know for your research. Whatever you know, you are going to learn more, so find something that will engage you for a long period. Format: The I-Search paper should be written in four sections (Yes, you should label them.—preferably with a cool title for each section. No, you don’t need to start a separate page for each.): 1. 2. 3. 4. What I already know, assume, or imagine and why I am interested. (1-2 pages) The search—what I did to go about learning more. (1-2 pages) What I discovered and what this means to me. (3-4 pages) Works Cited 1. What I already know or assume, why I am interested, and what I want to learn. After clearing your topic with me, but before conducting any formal research, write a section in which you explain to the reader what you think you know, what you assume, or what you imagine about your topic. For example, if you decided to investigate the debate over the war in Iraq, you might want to explain your own thoughts about the war, what you know, and why you find this topic interesting. Then, come up with a list of things that you want to learn such as the various exit strategies, the cost of the war, etc. Some advice here: the more specific your topic is, the easier it will be to write your essay. For example, one student who has ADHD might want to investigate the argument that America is overmedicating its youth with drugs like Ritalin. I suggest that you narrow your search to 2-3 very specific questions that you clearly identify at the end of your first section. (Hint: Even though in initial drafts you might write this section in present tense, you will probably want to change it to past tense by the final draft.) 2. The search. Test your knowledge, assumptions, or conjectures by researching your topic thoroughly. Consult useful books, magazines, newspapers, films, tapes, and other sources for information. When possible, interview people who are authorities on or who are familiar with your topic. Write this part of your paper in narrative form, recording the steps of the discovery process (you may want to start with “First I…”). Which aspects were easy and why? Which were more challenging? (You’ll want to take VERY good notes along the way.) Do not feel obligated to tell everything, but highlight the English 101 Syllabus 11 happenings and facts you uncovered that were crucial to your hunt and contributed to your understanding of the topic. Important: you do not need citations in this section, because you should not be revealing specific information from your sources. You are just explaining HOW you found them. 3. What I discovered and what this means to me. After concluding your search, compare what you thought you knew or assumed and what you imagined you would learn with what you actually discovered. You might begin your introduction with the formula: “First I believed _____________________________, but now after my research, I understand _____________________________________________. Then insert an argumentative thesis sentence that covers your argument that is now informed by your research. Offer some personal commentary along the way “To my surprise, I discovered that...” and draw some conclusion. Use the skills you have developed this semester in rhetorical analysis to critique the arguments that you find along the way. Point out logical fallacies wherever you find them (even if they are in your own initial thought). Make sure that you look at objective material concerning your topic, and incorporate not just opinion, but fact in support of your conclusion. Refer explicitly back to the 2-3 questions that you identified in section one of your paper. If you found satisfying answers to those questions, explain why. If you didn’t, explain why not. This third section is the more traditional, “research paper” part of your paper. This section is also the part that should contain your citations of other sources. Intentional plagiarism will result in a failing grade for the entire class, and you will be reported to the Honor Court. 4. Works Cited. At the end of the paper, attach a formal Works Cited in MLA format listing the sources that you used to write your paper. We will go over how to do a works cited in class. Make SURE that you have the minimum required sources and the variety of sources requested. Failure to do so will result in a failing grade for the essay. You must photocopy or print source material and turn in with your paper so that I can check your sources. As always, ask me if you have any questions. English 101 Syllabus 12