REBECCA BOONE AND KENTUCKY FRONTIER WOMEN BLUEGRASS HERITAGE MUSEUM, WINCHESTER, MAY 13, 2010 Searching for evidences of women in the history of Kentucky is like pushing through the lush Kentucky cane, taller than a woman on horseback, in the beautiful Bluegrass. Reasonably, many resources are at hand – but most show evidences of men’s lives and thoughts. Where are the women? We can find Rebecca Bryan Boone and other women of our state’s early years in the census and tax records. Let’s review the few facts we know about Rebecca: she was born in Virginia on January 9, 1738, to Joseph Bryan, Sr. and Alee Linville. Her mother died shortly after she was born. When she was ten, Rebecca moved with her Quaker grandparents, Morgan and Martha (Strode) Bryan, to the Yadkin River valley in the backwoods of North Carolina. Meanwhile Daniel Boone and his family settled near the Bryans in North Carolina. The two families knew each other well. Rebecca and Daniel began their courtship in 1753 and married three years later on August 14, 1756. Frontier women’s lives were rough and violent, and Rebecca’s was no different. From the first time the Boones fled trouble (the first time during the Cherokee War in 1759) until her death, Rebecca set up house at least 15 times. Their marriage lasted fifty-six years. Together they had ten children‹-six sons and four daughters. Rebecca moved many times during her lifetime. She created homes in North Carolina, Virginia, Kentucky, and finally Missouri where she spent the last 1 fourteen years of her life. We know that Rebecca Boone died at the age of 75 on March 18, 1813, at her daughter Jemima Boone Callaway's home near the village of Charette (near present day Marthasville). She was buried at the Bryan family cemetery nearby overlooking the Missouri River, reinterred and buried again in Frankfort, Kentucky. Rebecca Bryan Boone has always been spotted at the edges of historical narratives published about her iconic husband – even during her own lifetime. John Filson’s 1784 publication of The Adventures of Colonel Daniel Boone1 refers to her only in passing – thus maintaining her proper role of respectable matron. The earliest and most influential portrait of her was in the 1833 Memoir of Daniel Boone,2 largely written by Timothy Flint. Flint described her as the Victorian Age’s ideal woman: meek yet courageous, and her husband’s affectionate friend. In 1852, Elizabeth Ellet’s Pioneer Women of the West3 dropped the meekness but emphasized her domestic skills, leaving readers to think that she worked near the hearth raising children and forgetting that her husband said she had “transported my family and goods, on horses, through the wilderness, amidst a multitude of dangers”4 and that she hunted well enough to feed her large extended family and others (as her husband recounted). Many tell the same stories based on Flint and Ellet over and over with slight variations as evidence more of her place in revered legends of pioneer Kentucky than in history. 2 Can’t we do better for Rebecca Boone and other women like her? When historians choose to look for primary sources by or about women of Kentucky, there are many: in letters, memoirs and celebratory speeches; in tax records, store ledgers and overseers’ farm reports; in pamphlets, newspapers and even in our earliest printed books. But Rebecca, the daughter of a Welsh Quaker in North Carolina backcountry without formal education, who was an experienced midwife, leather tanner, sharpshooter and linen-maker – resourceful and independent in the isolated areas she and her large, combined family often found themselves – is rarely mentioned. Try finding illiterate, rural Kentucky women in our history books – a few pioneers, some slaves, lots of belles and wealthy white women. The same stories told long ago filter through to the current day history books, and each time they are resurrected often without question. The task before us then is to look more carefully at the way that the early documentation portrays women – to examine the “lens” of history used by those who recorded women’s deeds and aspirations of their time. Women who came to start a new life in Kentucky brought with them the cultural expectations of womanhood - both white and black. For white and free black women, the political and cultural messages of the earlier part of this time period under study reflected the ideal of the ancient world’s Spartan mother who gave up everything to raise her son to be a good citizen of the republic. Called 3 “republican motherhood” by historians today,5 the ideal expected of a good woman was to use her powers to draw wayward men into more pious and moral approaches to republican virtue – and to use her maternal influence and intellectual powers to teach her sons to become a model citizen of the Republic. For most Black women, the life of a bonded servant left few opportunities, even in the American backwoods. Whether a field hand or a domestic, a Black woman’s physical strength and careful negotiation skills were critical for her survival. Considered less than human by white communities, yet highly prized for her versatility in skills – and fertility – a black woman on the Kentucky frontier sought out her own communities to support her rather than remain the only slave for hire or owned by a white family struggling for basic subsistence. The women of the backcountry Virginia and Pennsylvania, usually second generation immigrants, knew of these expectations and brought them with them as they traveled down the Ohio River or through the Cumberland Gap. Kentucky women during the frontier days participated in crafting a social, economic and political world that was unique and noteworthy in a new nation. The Kentucky frontier had begun to transform in the 1790s to an economic locus for those journeying down the Ohio River or up through the Cumberland Gap and north into the rich Ohio Valley lands or further west to the new lands and profitable markets of New Orleans. While scholars agree that most women moved 4 west reluctantly, yet Kentucky women, slave and free, served key roles in the early history of Kentucky as entrepreneurs, artists, farm managers, laborers and artisans – as well as wives and mothers, sisters and daughters. African American women, here as early as 1777 at Fort Harrod, lived a more difficult life, lonely for their kin and community back east. They are part of the untold stories evidenced in the quick successes of Kentucky’s early stations and homesteads. Many frontier homes were mere shacks clustered together for military support during attacks (certainly not as neat as this image by Colonel Henderson) and quickly abandoned once the conditions in the station or fort worsened. Since most men served as the local military and did not stay at home for very long, their wives had to manage their economic futures on the farm. The violence of the frontier meant that there were many young widows, but they rarely stayed single. A frontierswoman succeeded economically and socially if she married at some point in her life. The Virginia law of coverture continued on the frontier and this meant that married women had few rights in property ownership or even in the guardianship of their own children. In practical terms, though, women often had strong personal control over their lands and family -- and widows could serve as the heads of household . This power greatly increased if the woman had a strong kin network to support her. Records of early Kentucky women’s wills and land transactions show that women were able to accumulate great wealth and exercise a legal independence unknown 5 in the former British colonies across the mountains. Scanning the earliest lists of Kentuckians’ personal tax lists, I found 31 women’s names – and seven of them are slave owners. Another four women paid taxes on bonded servants. We don’t know if these women were white or if they spoke English as their first language, though it is probably the case. Kentucky women joined together, white and black separately, in leadership roles in churches and schools – and many were strong advocates for temperance or the abolition of slavery. However, illiteracy – since too many families moving into the Southern frontier did not choose to or have the opportunity to teach their girls to read – bound many women in Kentucky to a legal and often physically dependent status.6 We can see if we look closely an implicit leadership by women in communal food gathering, growing and processing. Male settlers on their own squandered much of the natural resources with the indiscriminate killing of buffalo and other wild game, and they often were late in planting crucial food crops since they showed more interest in hunting, warfare and adventures than farming. Visitors and potential settlers of Kentucky traveled through a hardwood forest of walnuts, maples, oaks, ash, and beech, and the meadows of rustling canebrakes in which wild game and hunters could hide. The fertile area, rich with natural springs, streams and ponds, provided an abundance of river mussels, fish and turtle easily gathered by those who knew where to look. It also yielded nuts, seeds, fruits, and 6 squash and during the eighteenth century enterprising settlers in the area had already introduced corn, beans and other crops raised by Native American women. It is likely that white women gathered and cultivated some leftover variants when they arrived in this area. Sketches of stations or forts where women lived showed evidence of their presence, even when the written records did not. One good example of this, a sketch of Constant’s Station in 1785 as remembered by one of its residents, shows where fields included hemp for women to process for clothing and cordage.7 In the 1780s the frontierswomen of Strode’s Station (nearby Winchester in Clark County) worked together to produce thirty yards of hemp linen for an old widower – this was recorded in an oral history interview by Reverend John Dabney Shane when he interviewed William Clinkenbeard.8 Pioneer families often planted flax and hemp right away for domestic production of clothing, cordage, bagging and paper for family consumption or for barter. Women traditionally managed the textile production in the rural home. The richer the pioneer, the more hemp could be grown, manufactured and sold for a hefty profit – and women, whether black or white, took advantage of this opportunity in the new frontier. The Wickliffe Preston Papers at UK show that slave women on Fayette County farms in the 1790s worked long past their task rate and earned extra money producing bolts of jean cloth for sale both locally and to ship down river. Tax lists for the 1780s and 90s show a surprising number of early pioneer 7 women as well as men owned slaves or had indentured servants who could do the back-breaking work in the hemp and flax fields. With the opening of the Mississippi River in the late 1790s, hemp became an important export commodity and manufacturers of good quality hemp products on a reliable basis made more money by shipping large quantities down river to New Orleans. Most pioneer farmwomen (especially those with extensive kin networks as Rebecca Bryan Boone did) felt obligated to -- though didn’t always succeed in -maintaining the trappings of civilization in the midst of the complex and horrific violence of the Kentucky frontier.9 One of the stories of the Boone family carefully handed down through the years leaves us a clue. Rebecca insisted that her boy, caught on the Great Warriors Path, tortured and finally killed by Indians (one of whom he had known), be buried wrapped up in one of her handmade linen sheets. Even though her son would never see home again, she made sure he was encased in one of her most precious domestic possessions as a sort of protection against the wilderness. For many, Daniel Boone is an iconic figure in Kentucky history, and the impact of his Wilderness Road remains huge. Before 1800 more than two hundred thousand people, many of them slaves, had come to Kentucky over the Wilderness Road, the route first explored, marked and laid out by Boone.10 The earliest stories of Kentucky and the American frontier included biographies of Boone, and his 8 wife was the pioneer woman venerated by all. In 1852 George Caleb Bingham painted an epic portrait of Boone escorting settlers through the Cumberland Gap. Rebecca Boone plays the part of the romantic Madonna, this time completed in interpretive ways with a faithful hunting dog and her husband leading the noble charger. She represented all pioneer women who by the mid-nineteenth century were idealized and celebrated. In a memorial to the early Kentucky frontier women, the Lexington Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution erected a wall around a spring five miles out on Bryan’s Station Pike on August 16, 1896,. It is said to be the first monument funded and erected “by women – for women.” The inscription reads: “In Honor of the Women of Bryan’s Station who on 15th of August, 1782, faced a Savage Host in Ambush and With Heroic Courage and a Sublime Self-Sacrifice that will remain Forever Illustrious Obtained from this Spring the Water that made Possible the Successful Defense of that Station.” The stories describe the sixteen younger women at first as scared and reluctant, but convinced in their heroic duties by the older women. Led by Jemima Suggett Johnson, twenty-eight girls and women made “the resolute march to the spring,” and even – so they say – laughed as they passed within shooting range of the enemy, filled their buckets and returned to the stockade.11 This physical act of protest against the British and their Indian allies became early on a cherished moment in Kentucky history. 9 Their bravery stands in the face of a fear of a “fate worse than death” – rape and slavery in an Indian community – a marker for the racist beliefs of the day but which also arose from a very real threat. The Shawnee continued to raid Kentucky settlements after the other Indians had given up, and even threatened a pan-Indian uprising during the War of 1812. In the antebellum stories of Daniel Boone, there inevitably came a version of the story when a band of four Shawnee and Cherokee kidnapped his thirteen-year-old daughter Jemima and her girlfriends as they avoided work back at the fort with a pleasure ride on the river. Here is the 1852 lithograph by Karl Bodmer and Jean-Francois Millet, “The Abduction of the Daughters of Boone and Callaway” in which the image of the “savage” is clearly represented in terms of potential rape. The stories that come down to us from that incident include an aura of this fear – and storytellers emphasized that the girls were not injured. A descendent of Jemima remembers how embarrassed the girls said they were when their male relatives (and Jemima’s future husband) found them with their skirts chopped off above the knees – despite the fact the Shawnee had given them leggings and moccasins to hide their legs.12 This lithograph, painted by George Fasel and published in an 1851 book titled Heroic Deeds of Former Times, depicts Daniel Boone rescuing his teenage daughter, Jemima, from captivity (note Boone’s famous wide brimmed beaver felt hat) and she returned to marry a boy from her frontier settlement home. 10 Women who helped build the frontier forts, homesteads, villages and cities of Kentucky however did not always remain tied to a domestic role as prescribed and valorized in the ideal of the republican mother or submissive slave. Records include stories of women evidence military valor during their lives of constant warfare. Most women had to take on the role of frontier warriors but preferred to remain anonymous in the process, and a more acceptable role was publicly to shame men not adequate in their roles in the defense of the community. Women retained the responsibility then for turning the frontier into the civilization of domesticity they once knew or wanted to emulate. (Here is a double log cabin still standing in the late 19th century for a nostalgic photo opportunity – even log cabins could be upgraded when a family hoped to become more respectable.) Mostly of the middle-class and married (since poor or working-class women could not often afford the expensive trip to the west), they brought with them or ordered from relatives or favorite stores back East the respectable white doilies, elegant china and plated silver for their tables. While Kentucky frontier women kept having babies, working in the fields to clothe and feed their families, they also started up schools when forted and made sure that preachers held church services when they could. But it is difficult to see these women as simply one thing or another. Daniel Trabue remembered some women traveling from Forts Harrod and Logan went on a shooting spree but transformed into “Ladys” when they celebrated in fancy dress 11 at George Roger Clark’s new Fort Nelson at the Falls of the Ohio in 1779.13 Kentucky women sent their men off to war regularly throughout the early years in the hopes of a safer, more civilized life. Colonel John Todd who built the Lexington fort had brought his Virginia wife and slaves to join him during these dangerous times. Jane Hawkins Todd held tea parties while still living in the fort, though as one woman remembered her mother telling it, she had “nothing but tea and dried buffaloe (sic) meat.”14 Todd brought her genteel manners and worldview with her from Virginia and crafted her world of parlor politics even in the midst of frontier violence. In Kentucky shanties or log cabins were the norm, but in the early towns brick houses and elegant Federal-style houses sprang up. Young ladies’ academies became popular in this time period and the practical value of women who knew history, empirical science, political theory and moral philosophy could best prepare their children for the new nation. At the same time, the academy’s curriculum must include the fine arts so that the educated lady could entertain her husband and his friends upon their return from the new battles of capitalism and electoral politics. Lexington had three schools for girls before 1800. Around 1793 Mrs. Ann Walsh opened a school just for girls where they would learn spelling, reading and needle-work. In 1797 Mrs. Lucy Gray established an academy at her country home four miles out from town where lessons included Italian and arithmetic. The next year Mr. James W. Stevens rented 12 the upper story of Montgomery Bell’s storehouse to use as a young ladies academy “in order to prevent an indiscriminate intercourse of the sexes so injurious to the morals, and incompatible with the delicacy of the ‘fair’ for the purpose of conferring the degree of a classical education.”15 The conscious effort to create an educated and enlightened society makes a case for perceiving the ideal of womanhood in Kentucky to be more active than passive, more literate and important consumers in the frontier economy. Some may have learned also to become more assertive in genteel company conversation contributing also to heated political debates, and surely not all of them growing up to be pliant wallflowers as shown in the fashionable images of the day. For those frontier women outside of the wealthy elite, an important locus of power became the great religious revivals of Kentucky which started in the summer of 1800. Even before then, frontier families would travel for miles to attend a Sunday preaching marathon that would last two to three hours. Few churches had pews, but the early churches all segregated their congregations by sex and race. The service would end with a family picnic and important social and political interactions that served as “welcome relief from the toil and loneliness of frontier life.”16 During the in-migrations of the 1790s the established frontier churches couldn’t keep up, and the historical records emphasize the obsession with salvation and redemption in the white and black communities during this time of 13 transition. Informal “fast and prayer” societies came into vogue, and religious tract publishers made big profits. Little is known about the more informal activities in women’s homes, but historians acknowledge that these then fueled the attendance for the camp revivals as well as the temperance, abolitionist and Sunday School movements that are well documented. A good example is Margaretta Mason Brown who came to Frankfort in 1801. The daughter of a Presbyterian minister from New York City, she married the Kentucky Senator John Brown who had read law with Thomas Jefferson. Influenced by Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, she was fiercely anti-slavery and a dedicated mother to her boys. She led study circles for young women in her home (often held in the lovely orchard behind the house), and in 1810 established the first Sunday school west of the Allegheny Mountains. Her work came to fruition with the formation of the First Presbyterian Church of Frankfort. Other women who fueled the religious fervor of Kentucky were those who traveled the rough trails of the backcountry to attend camp revivals and then retreated to communal life. For example, there were those who were recruited at the revivals to join the United Society of Believers in Christ’s Second Coming – the Shakers at South Union and at Pleasant Hill (near Harrodsburg). These converts promised to live a “virgin life” and abstain from any forms of lust, especially sex. For rural women who lived a life of endless work, constant 14 pregnancy and degradation in a violent world of men, the Shaker communal life must have seemed a haven.17 There they could learn a trade, become educated, worship ecstatically and be a part of a community that respected them as human beings. Their simple, functional designs for household and farming tools and furniture, their breed stock and specially hybridized seeds, their music and dancing, and self-published books became popular in secular culture. The idea of Mother Ann Lee as the second half of Jesus, the female form of Christ, must have been truly radical and empowering for those who regularly heard from their regular preachers of the evils of women as daughters of Eve and Jezebel.18 Working women in central Kentucky were the norm, whether free or slave, so the hard work was nothing new to their recruits.19 Women’s lives in the rural southern backcountry of the nineteenth century meant isolation and loneliness, and the social gatherings that reinforced kin networks, religious beliefs or political agendas, served as wonderful diversions from the usual drudgery of subsistence farming.20 Central Kentucky is unique in the agrarian norm for this time period, and though not much research has been done on the status of women in the Lexington environs, it is worth exploring. American post-colonial society began to see a change in the expectations for their women. The household economy of eighteenth century farms in which women and men worked together to be self-sufficient 15 changed with the rise of cities and international trade along the Atlantic coast. Sweatshops and the new age of the machine transformed American labor systems and birthed a market economy that devalued household-centered work. Society expected women to perform domestic labor in their own or as bonded labor in someone else’s home, while men became the preferred labor force for the new factories, workshops and offices. Slater’s Mill in Rhode Island, the first commercially successful cotton-spinning mill with a fully mechanized power system in America, started operating in 1793; Central Kentucky entrepreneurs within a decade had mechanized the carding and spinning of cotton, hemp and linen. According to the 1806 Lexington directory, John Wesley Hunt, one of the first millionaires west of the Alleghenies had a “Duck (canvas) manufactory” that employed 40-50 “hands” – very likely young girls or boys between eight and sixteen years of age. Society expected married women to perform domestic labor in their own or someone else’s home – and this contribution to the labor force became less valued by the new nation which focused on the new demands for labor in the new factories and offices. Lexington’s early industrial workforce included women and girls, both slave and free, on farms and in the city. The importance of the hemp and other textiles to early Kentucky has been documented. Around 1810 for example there were two steam mills for both flour and cotton manufactory, two cut nail factories, four hat 16 factories, thirteen rope-walks, five bagging factories, two sail-duck factories, four cotton and two wool spinning factories, a spectacle factory that mounted glasses, soap and candlemaking industries, a tobacco factory, a piano manufactory, an oil mill and a paper mill. Of the five wool carding factories, the newly invented machinery run by horse power was touted as being so simple that “any child could run it.”21 The Lexington Manufactory of 1816 advertised for women, girls and children over nine years to work - alongside their call for twenty men and boys from fourteen to twenty-one years of age.22 Ropewalks, bagging and weaving factories needed the dexterous hands of women and children. Women’s role in the northern textile industries has been well documented and analyzed, but rarely have historians looked at the female workforce in early Southern urban areas. Lexington most likely attracted girls into the urban workforce for the personal wages and different types of work than on the farm. Wendy Gordon compared the “independent migration” of young, unmarried and unchaperoned girls in England, Scotland and the U.S. northeast to the urban mills and marketplaces. Women’s supportive networks in these manufacturing centers helped to attract and retain women workers – though women alone and outside family relationships were viewed with suspicion, Gordon posits that this migration was the woman’s own choice in moving out of the home in order to transition to adult responsibilities.23 17 Women also took important economic roles in the several marketplaces in early Lexington: there were at least six market houses in antebellum Lexington, and in 1813 the watchman polled the town’s housekeepers to determine their preferences for market days.24 Women of all classes were important in early Lexington as consumers.25 Besides the regular markethouses, women likely worked as street vendors and upon-demand service providers such as laundresses, cooks, midwives, charwomen and prostitutes. Likely places for successful women entrepreneurs were at the many stagecoach taverns and train depots in and around Lexington26 and the county courthouse in the center of town. The life of a black woman in Kentucky was hard and fraught with dangers, even if she were free (and free women were very few). Women domestic servants and well as those in Kentucky fields were almost always in the near vicinity of whites, had more chance of being subjected to racial violence. The ultimate resistance to slavery was to run away, and women did. Of the advertisements in Kentucky newspapers for women who ran away, most included references to those women being with men and some carrying children with them. Kentucky’s women were a vital part of its success in these early years of its history. Like Rebecca Boone, somehow our women lost this status in the midtwentieth century, and the professional women of today are fighting the same cultural prejudices as all Kentuckians but one step down. Our future success as 18 Kentuckians can best be measured by the status of women in Kentucky . We have not yet found Mrs. Boone as she once must have been: strong, talented, resourceful and at the center of a civilized world of her own making. Gerda Lerner wrote that history should be seen as a necessity, and in crafting good history we must ask ourselves questions that can only be answered by including both men’s and women’s activities and ideas.27 What were women doing while men were doing what the books tell us they were doing? What were women experiencing while men were doing what the textbook tells our children were important activities? The nation knows only that today our women are poor, disfranchised, pregnant from an early age, illiterate and in ill health. Where is the entrepreneurial Kentucky woman we once had? Surely, studying our women’s past can help our young girls and boys of today create a better tomorrow. 19 Women’s Names in Personal Tax Lists of Fayette County, 1787-91 This is an abridged version of the personal tax lists, focusing only on those names that seemed to be for women. Part Second – State Enumerations of Heads of Families, Virginia & Kentucky.“First Census” of Kentucky 1790. Prepared under the supervision of Charles Brunk Heineman. Baltimore: Genealogical Pub. Co., Inc., 1993 (orig. pub. Washington D.C.: Gaius Marcus Brumbaugh, 1940). Taxpayer Head of Household Ann Baker Sarah Bush Joanne Campbell Eliz. Clemons Eliz. Curtner+ Mary Davison Marget Drake Eliz. Ewart Mary Gibson Mary Harper Rebecca Hunter Jane Huson Martha Johnson Eliz. Jones Grace Jones Mary McConnell Elizabeth McCorkle Marget McGuire Eliz. Mair Rosanna Mitchell Elizah Poage Mary Richardson Mary Spaw Jane Todd+ Jane Tompson Jane Venable Marget Ward Ester Wilson Jane Wilson Margaret Wilson Mary Wilson 1787 Tax List for Fayette County, Virginia (2 slaves) (1 slave) 1788 Tax List 1789/90/91 Tax Lists Fayette 1/11/1790 Fayette 6/30/1789 Woodford 5/29/1790 (5 slaves) Fayette 1/11/1790 Fayette 1/11/1790 Bourbon 3/1791 (Elliot*) (9 slaves; John and Francis*) Fayette 1/11/1790 Fayette 3/19/1790 ? (John*) (1 slave) (Michael Capiday*) (5 slaves) Fayette 1/11/1790 (1 slave) Fayette 1/11/1790 Fayette 2/26/1790 + - In 1783, the Lexington trustees distributed town lots to 3 women in addition to men: Jane Todd, “Widow McDonald,” and “Widow Kirtner” (could be Curtner?). * - additional white tithables ++ - Maybe this is the same Jane Thompson listed in the Lexington station Trustee book as receiving a town lot on December 26, 1781. Also, a Jane Thompson married John Scott on September 11, 1792 at Walnut Hill Presbyterian Church in Fayette County, according to the Papers of Rev. James Crawford, in the Rev. John Dabney Shane Manuscript Collection of the Presbyterian Historical Association, 28th Reel, Vol. 5. Female Heads of Household: Women’s Names in Early Lexington Directories (Free Black women are numbered in parentheses when identified as of color in the directory.) Occupations Boardinghouse Boot/shoe trimmer Cart Proprietor Confectioner & Fancy Goods Dressmaker Fancy Store Grocer Hat Trimmer Laundress Midwife Mattress Maker Milliner Morocco Manufacturer Music Teacher Schoolmistress Seamstress Shoe Binder Tailoress Weaver Women with no occupation listed or identified as “gentlewoman” or “widow of …” TOTAL 1806 1818 3 2 1838 & ‘39 8 1 1 (1) 9 1 2 1 (13) 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 12 23 (1) 1 3 1 1 2 3 (2) (1) 6 (1) 67 18 of 266 names 6.7% 35 of 541 names 6.5% 124 of 902 names 13.7% Note: The single black woman listed in the 1818 directory is Esther Underwood on Mulberry, “widow of Sam” (vs. such designations as “Mrs. Eliza Trotter,” “southern suburb,” and “widow of Gen George Trotter”). The 1818 Fayette County tax list shows “Underwood, heirs of Samuel (colored)” but no occupation listed; the entry under sex is “ha”; two inlots valued at $1200; two horses valued at $100; one cow valued at $10; one (4WH_N) valued at $150 and under the Other Tax “cart” valued at $40, 1 house, 1 stable, 1 death, total blacks 4, no specific address listed for the directory. The 1820 census lists her in the list for “free colored persons residing in Lexington” as (En(r?)ster Underwood) with three in her household. Sources: Charless, Joseph. Lexington Directory, Taken For Charless’ Almanack, for 1806.[Lexington, Ky., 1806]. MacCabe, Julius P. Bolivar. Directory of the City of Lexington and County of Fayette for 1838 & ‘39. Lexington, Ky.: J.C. Noble, 1838. Worsley and Smith, Lexington, Ky. Directory of the Town of Lexington, for 1818.[Lexington, Ky., 1818] ENDNOTES John Filson, “The Adventures of Colonel Daniel Boone, Containing a Narrative of the Wars of Kentucke” appended to The Discovery and Settlement of Kentucke (Wilmington, Del.: James Adams, Printer, 1784). 2 Timothy Flint, Biographical Memoir of Daniel Boone, the First Settler of Kentucky (Cincinnati: N & G Guildford, 1833). 3 Mrs. [Elizabeth Fries] Ellet, Pioneer Women of the West (New York: Charles Scribner, 1856), pp. 42-57. 4 Filson, p. 8. 5 On the expectation for white women in the new nation to be a good mother in order to fulfill her citizenly duties, see Linda K. Kerber, Women of the Republic: Intellect and ideology in Revolutionary America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980); and, Mary Beth Norton, Liberty’s Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 17501800 (Boston: Little, Brown, 1980). 6 Margaret Ripley Wolfe, Daughters of Canaan: A Saga of Southern Women (Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1995), p. 37. 7 Elizabeth A. Perkins, Border Life: Experience and Memory in the Revolutionary Ohio Valley (Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press), p. 72. 8 Lucien Beckner, ed., “Reverend John Dabney Shane’s Interview with Peioneer William Clinkenbeard,” The Filson Club History Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 3 (April 1928) p. 119. 9 Wolfe, Daughters of Canaan, p. 69. 10 John Mack Faragher, Daniel Boone: The Life and Legend of an American Pioneer (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1992), p. 351. 11 Reuben T. Durrett, Bryant’s Station and the Memorial Proceedings Held on its Site under the Auspices of the Lexington chapter, D. A. R., August the 18th, 1896, in honor of its heroic mothers and daughters. Filson Club publications; no. 12. Louisville, Ky.: J. P. Morton and Company, printers, 1897. 12 Nathan Boone, My Father, Daniel Boone: The Draper Interviews with Nathan Boone, edited by Neal O. Hammon (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1999), pp. 47-51; and, Michael A. Lofaro, Daniel Boone: An American Life (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2003), pp. 68-74. 13 Chester Raymond Young, ed., Westward into Kentucky: The Narrative of Daniel Trabue (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1981), pp. 55-56. 14 Quoted in Elizabeth Perkins, Border Life: Experience and Memory in the Revolutionary Ohio Valley (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), p. 105. 15 Kentucky Gazette (February 21, 1798), p. 3. 16 John B. Boles, Religion in Antebellum Kentucky (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1976), p. 15. 17 Married women’s lives in Kentucky’s rural areas were rough and violent. See for example Honor R. Sachs, “The Myth of the Abandoned Wife: Married Women’s Agency and the Legal Narrative of Gender in Eighteenth-Century Kentucky,” Ohio Valley History 3 (Winter 2003): 3-20. 18 See Karen Kay Nickless, “‘A Good Faithful Sister’: The Shaker Sisters of Pleasant Hill, Kentucky,” (Dissertation, Ph.D., University of South Carolina, 2004); Edward D. Andrews, The Community Industries of the Shakers (Philadelphia: Porcupine Press, Inc., 1972); Thomas 1 D. Clark and F. Gerald Ham, Pleasant Hill and Its Shakers (Harrodsburg, KY: Pleasant Hill Press, 1983); and, Flo Morse, The Shakers and the World’s People (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1987). 19 For the importance of researching rural women’s lives, see John Mack Faragher, “History from the Inside Out: Writing the History of Women in Rural America,” American Quarterly 33 (1981): 537-57. 20 See Margaret Ripley Wolfe, Daughters of Canaan: A Saga of Southern Women (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995), esp. pp. 62-65. See also, Richard Sears, “Working Like A Slave: Views of Slavery and the Status of Women in Antebellum Kentucky,” Register of the Kentucky Historical Society 87 (Winter 1989): 1-39. 21 Kentucky Gazette, March 25, 1813. 22 Kentucky Gazette, February 12, 1816. 23 Wendy M. Gordon, Mill Girls and Strangers: Single Women’s Independent Migration in England, Scotland and the United States, 1850-1881 (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002), pp. 2, 156-157. 24 Kentucky Gazette (August 3, 1813), p. 1. 25 See Elizabeth Perkins, Border Life: Experience and Memory in the Revolutionary Ohio Valley (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998). 26 Nancy Levinson wrote that white, black and Native American women were not only employed in car-cleaning and other domestic services jobs for the railroads in the 1830s, but they also served water to passengers or sold fruit to women traveling in ladies’ cars. Levinson, She’s Been Working on the Railroad (Dutton: Lodestar Books, 1997). See also the description of the amenities available at The Villa, a train rest stop in Versailles on the way from Lexington to Frankfort in the Lexington Observer & Reporter, (May 23, 1833), p. 4, col. 4. 27 Gerda Lerner, Why History Matters: Life and Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 119.