Enquiries:
Mrs L Garlipp/Mr S Shabalala
Telephone:
012 310 3313/3449
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
BRIEFING ON THE AREAS OF AMENDMENTS UNDER THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT LAWS SECOND AMENDMENT BILL, 2013
1.
PURPOSE
1.1.
To provide the Portfolio Committee with an overview of the areas of amendment under the
National Environmental Management Laws Second Amendment Bill, 2013 (Second
Amendment Bill), the subsequent changes made to the Bill and the reason therefore.
2.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
2.1.
The proposed amendments in the Second Amendment Bill were part of the National
Environmental Management Laws Amendment Bill [B 13 – 2012] (NEMLA Bill) before a
decision was taken in September 2012 by the Portfolio Committee to split the Bill into two Bills,
namely, National Environmental Management Laws First Amendment Bill [biodiversity
amendments], and National Environmental Management Laws Second Amendment Bill
[National Environmental Management Act amendments].
2.2.
The NEMLA Bill was tabled in parliament in April 2012. The briefing to the Portfolio Committee
on the NEMLA Bill was held on 14 February 2012. Public hearings were held on 21, 22, 28
August 2012. Thereafter, the Portfolio Committee discussed the NEMLA Bill clause by clause
on 5, 18 and 19 September 2012.
1
2.3.
On 19 September 2012 the Portfolio Committee took a decision to split the NEMLA Bill into the
First Amendment Bill and Second Amendment Bill. The First Amendment Bill deals with the
non-controversial biodiversity amendments, and the Second Amendment Bill deals with the
non-controversial and controversial amendments to the National Environmental Management
Act, 1998 (NEMA). The main reason for the split was that the proposed amendments to
biodiversity amendments were urgent to address most of the challenges relating to the
permitting system and the implementation of the new Threatened or Protected Species
Regulations.
2.4.
The Second Amendment Bill proposes amendments to certain provisions under the NEMA, and
most of the amendments were identified through the implementation of the Act and some
originated from the Department of Cooperative Governance process of identifying legislation
that hampers service delivery.
2.5.
The Second Amendment Bill contains new additions and amendments proposed by the
Department and the Portfolio Committee in order to enable the implementation of the
provisions relating to environmental management planning, integrated environmental
management and compliance and enforcement.
2.6.
The proposed amendments to the NEMA aims to, amongst others, achieve the following:
2.6.1. The Second Amendment Bill seeks to amend and insert certain definitions to provide clarity and
remove any ambiguity. Due to two new amendments added to the Bill two new definitions were
added, namely definition for “adoption” and “disaster”.
2.6.2. The provisions being amended seeks to change the timeframes for the preparation of
environmental implementation plans and environmental management plans from 4 years to 5
years, in order to afford the elected government with a legal mandate to implement its priorities.
2.6.3. The Second Amendment Bill also inserts a new section requiring the Department, provincial
departments responsible for environmental affairs and, on a voluntary basis, metropolitan and
district municipalities to prepare and publish environment outlook reports. These reports will
provide the state of the environment at a national, provincial and local level. A new amendment
was added by the Portfolio Committee that will provide the Minister with legal mandate to
prescribe by regulation the process for the submission, adoption of and compliance with these
reports.
2
2.6.4. The major amendments to Chapter 5 of NEMA will, amongst others, provide the Minister with
legal mandates(a)
to restrict or prohibit certain developments in certain geographical areas for a certain
period of time on certain conditions.
A new amendment was proposed by the
Department to provide clarity that the competent authority may not accept any further
application where the Minister has published a notice prohibiting or restricting the
granting of an environmental authorisation within a specified geographical area;
(b)
to develop norms or standards for activities, sectors or geographical areas;
(c)
to deal with an environmental authorisation application pertaining to any activity
relating to a matter that has been declared a national priority by Cabinet. This
amendment was proposed by the Department in order to provide the Minister with a
legal mandate to issue an environmental authorisation regarding any activity that has
been declared a national priority by Cabinet; and
(d)
to intervene on written request by the applicant and to take a decision in instances
where an MEC fails to take a decision within prescribed timeframes regarding an
application for an environmental authorisation. This clause was substantial revised to
properly align it with section 125(2)(b) of the Constitution of the Republic of South
Africa, 2006 as well as to provide for various steps before the applicant may request
Minister’s intervention.
The adjustments were on the request of the Portfolio
Committee and were necessary in order to ensure that the Minister acts within the
ambit of the Constitution.
2.6.5. The Department also revisited the amendment to section 24C(2)(b) on request of the Portfolio
Committee and the minor amendment thereto is only to provide legal clarity.
2.6.6
Other proposed amendments relating to an environmental authorisation will provide for the
transfer of rights and obligations even in situations where there is no change in ownership in
the property.
2.6.7. The Second Amendment Bill will also include a new amendment proposed by a Department of
Cooperative Governance project on legislation hampering service delivery. The main reason
for the proposed amendment is that it is sometimes necessary for national departments or
provincial departments to commence with a listed activity in order to prevent, contain or
3
mitigate a disaster. In most cases, these are measures taken to save lives or property. The
amendment will allow those departments to commence with a listed activity without an
environmental authorisation. However, the disaster must be declared in terms of the Disaster
Management Act, 2002.
2.6.8. On request of the Portfolio Committee all the criminal offences is now placed in one place in the
Bill. Also the defence in terms of the previous section 24F(3) of the Act (now the new section
49A(2)) has now been qualified as requested by the Portfolio Committee.
2.6.9
The proposed amendments were substantially amended to address most of the public
comments received during the public hearings. With the suggested amendments the section
24G process will be tighter and vigorous with respect to the process.
The proposed
amendments are, in the main, meant to deal with the abuses of the section 24G process. The
amendment will de-link section 24G process from the commission of a section 24F offence.
The commencement of a listed activity without an environmental authorisation is an offence
under NEMA, and the de-link approach will provide the Department, after assessing the facts,
with options to either pursue criminal prosecution or allow for a rectification. The amendment
will also provide the competent authority with a legal mandate to direct the applicant to stop the
listed activity pending a decision on the section 24G application.
2.6.10 The amendments will also provide the competent authority with options when processing a
section 24G environmental authorisation application, namely, refusal to issue an environmental
authorisation and direct rehabilitation, issue an environmental authorisation subject to certain
conditions or defer a decision to issue an environmental authorisation where there is a criminal
investigation. In addition, the amendments will clarify that the submission of a section 24G
application does not derogate the Department’s responsibility of initiating and conducting
criminal investigation and prosecution in appropriate circumstances. The amendments will also
increase the section 24G administrative fine from R1 million to R5 million.
2.6.11. The Portfolio Committee has also suggested a new clause that the Minister must develop
regulations relating to the procedure and criteria to be followed in the determination of a section
24G administrative fine.
The Portfolio Committee further suggested that all offences and
penalties must be contained under one section, and as a result this process resulted in
consequential amendments to most sections of NEMA dealing offences and penalties.
4
2.6.12. The Second Amendment Bill further provides for an amendment de-linking the duty of care
requirement on a section 28 directive. The environmental management inspectors have been
experiencing a number of challenges with respect to the implementation of the duty of care
requirement on section 28 directives.
The de-linking approach will ensure easier
implementation and enforceability of this provision.
2.6.13. Other compliance and enforcement amendments provides the environmental management
inspectors with power to seize, without a warrant, a vehicle, vessel, aircraft or any other
transport mechanism which may afford evidence of the commission or suspected commission
of an offence. This amendment will enhance the enforcement provisions of NEMA, and will
assist the environmental management inspectors in effectively performing their compliance and
enforcement function.
2.6.14. The Second Amendment Bill also provides the Minister with a legal mandate to develop
regulations to control products that may have a detrimental effect on the environment. A similar
provision was contained in the repealed provisions under the Environment Conservation Act,
1989 (ECA). For example, the asbestos regulations were developed in terms of a similar
provision under the ECA. This provision will assist in dealing with products that pose a problem
to the environment.
2.6.15. The amendments further provide clarity that the Department must table instead of submitting
the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations at Parliament before final implementation.
This clause will provide clarity that any amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment
Regulations must be tabled before Parliament before implementation.
2.6.16. The proposed amendments will allow for the use of other mechanisms of delivering documents
under the NEMA or other specific environmental management Act, namely by fax, e-mail or
ordinary mail. This clause will ensure that the NEMA adapts to modern technology of
conducting business.
2.6.17. The amendments will further reiterate that NEMA is applicable to the State without exceptions.
However, the Portfolio Committee expressed concerns as to the extent that the State can be
held criminally liable as the State and will, through the National Prosecuting Authority, be
prosecuting itself. In this regard, the Portfolio Committee requested the Chief State Law
Adviser to provide the Committee with a legal opinion on the practical implementation of the
5
proposed amendment. The issue whether this clause must be deleted or retained will be
informed by the legal opinion of the Chief State Law Adviser.
2.7. Copies of the draft Second Amendment Bill and Memorandum on Objects are attached hereto
for the Portfolio Committee ease of reference.
6