SS1 - Sociology of the family 1 Why is family important? Personal issue but also a public one (CW Mills) – ‘private troubles and public issues’ It is not possible to understand 'the family' outside its social context. In other words, you can not put 'the family' in a box and talk about sex roles, socialisation or power relations, without also looking at how these are affected by work, education, social welfare, taxation policy and so on. Family is seen to be important in Irish society for various reasons: symbolic (eg Irish Constitution) policy (eg individualisation; FFWP) liked to ideas of change in Irish society (divorce, contraception, sex education &c) diversity (family forms and patterns) – indeed a changing definition of what constitutes a family (eg extended family to nuclear family to new forms of family (blended, single, gay, unrelated people &c) media, advertisers, marketers, politicians &c frequently use ‘family’ as an emotive marketing tool. Also a major topic of discussion (eg Marion Finucane, Gerry Ryan) Sociologists’ interest: site of socialisation (eg fatherhood; childcare) structuring basis of society (eg kinship) institution of reproduction (eg property relations; education) (O’Hara) policy issues (eg taxation, shiftwork, flexible patterns of work, childcare, social care, fostering &c) Family structure changing Key changes: decline in marriage decline in birth & fertility rates later age of marriage & first childbirth increased ex-nuptial births smaller completed family size (1981-1996 - families with one and two children grew by 26% and 34%, respectively. increase in numbers remaining single increase in cohabitees? (1,298 family units consisting of cohabiting couples, accounting for 3.9% of all family units in 1996; 60% were couples without children) increase in lone parent families (there were close to 130,000 lone-parent families in 1996, with more than four in five of them headed by women)( in more than 45% of lone-parent families a widowed person was the parent. in a further 28% the lone parent was separated while single parents accounted for 15% of all lone-parent families in 1996) increasing number of childless (childfree?) couples (a 34% increase in the number of couples without children in the fifteen-year period to 1996 - whether married or not) Sociological approaches A shift in the way that sociologists have viewed the family: from an 'innocent' approach that saw the family in a positive light, to one that takes a less favourable view and focuses on 'inequity' within the family. This reflects a shift from functionalist theories of the family to a conflict perspective: particularly towards an analysis influenced by feminism. The functionalist approach focuses on the functions the family serves for society: principally in terms of reproduction and socialisation. For functionalists males and females have distinctive sex roles within the family: the male role involves paid work and decision-making; the female role includes caring, emotional support and day-today management of the family. Marxists (or conflict theorists) have tended to accept this analysis, but have also focused on the ways in which the family reduces the cost of labour by providing free childcare, catering and domestic services and also helps to reproduce capitalist ideologies of consumerism and respect for authority. They also argue that family well-being is strongly influenced by class and the labour market. Generally speaking, for Marxists, families are viewed as stable and conservative institutions. These approaches dominated the sociology of the family until the women's movement re-emerged in the 1960s and blew open the formerly taken-for-granted nature of the family. Feminism did not simply accept the idea of the family as a unit - it probed beneath the surface and discovered some fairly unsavoury aspects. Women were encouraged to speak out, for the first time, about the realities of family life. It became apparent that the family was not so much a haven as a site of conflict. Incest, domestic violence (not recognised in Ireland until late 1980s) and exploitation within families were shown not to be pathological exceptions, but as part of a broader pattern of power relationships within society. The revelation of such inequality led women to develop supports for the victims of family life: they established women's refuges, rape crisis centres, incest phone-ins and help for those sexually and physically abused (see Gilligan’s book for further information). Women, Social Welfare And The State Despite the fact that women have made a significant move into the workforce, they still constitute the majority of welfare beneficiaries. Women are also major providers of welfare, for example caring for disabled children or aged relatives. Thus women are significantly affected by state welfare policies. Many feminists have argued that welfare policies in countries like Ireland , Australia, the USA and Britain have tended to support particular forms of the family and have perpetuated the dependence of women. The result of this is that many women and their children are trapped in poverty. Welfare policies are linked to patterns of low pay and weak connection with the labour market that many women are forced into because of their domestic responsibilities. The relationship between women and the state is important in other ways. Family law, for example, is crucial to many women's security in relation to property, particularly in cases of marriage breakdown. Many governments (including in Ireland through the NWCI) now have special women's units or offices that perform an important role in monitoring and attempting to improve the status of women – often in conjunction with broader international bodies such as the UN. A very important function of the state is as an employer of women. The community services sector (including social care) has been one of the fastest growing in the Irish economy and many of the jobs (in the government and non-government areas) have gone to women.