MGOB865: Leading Change Office hours – by appointment Office: Dean College Phone: 978-897-4562 wgobrien@live.com Course Overview: This course examines the nature and process of organizational change in the contemporary business environment and its importance to business results. It focuses on the challenges posed by managing both planned and unplanned change. We will look at successful change as a process involving organizational strategy, culture, people, structure and technology as well as individual, interpersonal and organizational processes and dynamics. We will pay particular attention to assessing the need for change, developing change strategies, implementing those strategies, overcoming resistance to change within the organization, and assessing the impact of change on the organization, its members, and other stakeholders. We will employ discussion, case analysis and decision-making simulations; e.g., role-playing. Students will develop requisite change agent skills and capabilities as well as an understanding of the technical, organizational and competitive dynamics associated with change. Application areas include such initiatives as: Change required for major corporate initiatives: o Quality; e.g., TQM or Six Sigma o Lean production o Ethical behavior o Sustainability IT-Based Process Change; e.g., ERP implementation Restructuring Mergers & Acquisitions Learning Objectives: By applying and integrating the knowledge, skills, and attitudes acquired in the course to a realworld business problem, students will achieve the following learning objectives: Knowledge Understanding of the principles, best practices and processes in change management Comprehension of the business case for change within organizations. Fluency with models for developing, implementing, and evaluating policies and programs in support of change. Skills Analyze key factors relating to the success or failure of major initiatives involving change. Synthesize large volumes of information to identify key issues and risks as well as to develop strategies for managing these risks thoughtfully. Attitudes Appreciation of the need for leadership and functional collaboration in order for organizations to succeed. Appetite for investigating and addressing complex problems in an ethical and broadminded manner. Recognition of the global demand for change in individuals as well as corporate business practices to preserve the environment for future generations. Texts: Kotter, John P. (1996), Leading Change, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Business School Press. Articles & Cases: Jim Collins, "Level 5 Leadership: The Triumph of Humility and Fierce Resolve," Harvard Business Review (reprinted July-August 2005). HBSP No. 5831 Eric Abrahamson, "Change Without Pain," Harvard Business Review (July-August 2000), HBSP No. 6498 Robert Kaplan and Eric Norton, "New Strategy Without Disrupting Your Organization," Harvard Business Review (March 2006), HBSP No. R0603G " John Smithers at Sigtek." HBS Case No. 491-035 "Sears Auto Centers," HBS Case No. 394-009 "Iggy's Bread of the World," HBS Case No. 801-292 “Wal-Mart’s Sustainability Strategy”, HBS Product#: OIT71 "Andrea Jung: Empowering Avon Women," HBS Case No. 406-095 "Gillette Singapore: Managing Global Business Integration on the Ground," HBS Case No. 897-102 Recommended Reading: Esther Cameron, Mike Green, (2004) Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools & Techniques of Organizational Change, Sterling, VA, Kogan Page Limited Noel M. Tichy (1986, 1990) The Transformational Leader… New York: John W. Wiley & Sons University Disability Statement Suffolk University is dedicated to a full university education for all its students and ensures that all students have access to university services. If you have a learning, physical, medical, or psychiatric disability that may impact your coursework, and are seeking classroom accommodations under the American with Disabilities Act, you are required to 1) meet with your instructor to discuss possible needs, and 2) register with the Dean of Students Office, 73 Tremont Street, 12th floor, 617-573-8239. The instructor must receive verification from the Dean of Students Office before accommodations are granted. All information and documentation is confidential. Academic Dishonesty University policies regarding student conduct as specified in your Student’s Handbook apply. In particular, please note that you are expected to follow an honor code whereby class members are invited to study and prepare together for most aspects of the course. However, where individual effort is expected, it must be unique for each person and without consultation. You may receive help on English grammar and syntax, but the final written product must be entirely your own written work. Please consult citation guides, cite thoroughly, and give credit where credit is due. Evaluation and Grading: Grades will be determined on the following basis: Cases (6) Class Preparation, Attendance & Contribution Team-based Project Total: 30% 20% 50% 100% Case Write-ups: Each case write-up should consist of a maximum of two typed, double-spaced pages of narrative in 12-point font. The “8 Step Assessment Tool” should be used to determine areas that have been or need to be addressed in the case. It should be attached as an exhibit. Other exhibits in the form of calculations, tables, charts, graphs, etc., may be added to the twopage narrative to enhance your discussion. However, these exhibits should not be in the form of prose extensions of your narrative. LATE PAPERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Class Preparation, Attendance & Contribution: To achieve the course goals and learning objectives outlined above, it is essential that each student: be prepared for class; i.e., has done the assigned readings, etc. arrive to class on time and contribute to class discussion Each student will be graded at the end of the semester in terms of the quality and quantity of his/her contribution to class discussions, etc. Class preparation, attendance and contribution are worth three points per class toward your final grade. Class contribution will be reported and verified at the end of each class. On the back of each student’s name card is a table with the number for each class session. Reporting will be accomplished by the student placing a check mark for the class verifying that he/she: was prepared for class; i.e., has done the assigned readings, etc., arrived on time, and contributed to class discussion. On the other hand, if a student is late for class or called upon and it is clear that he/she is unprepared, this will be recorded by the lecturer and reflected in the student’s final grade. Lastly, laptops will not be required during class. Therefore, class will begin when all laptops are closed. PLEASE COME PREPARED TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE CLASS DISCUSSION. Team-based Project – Change Management Plan & Presentation: 2-3 person teams, students will develop a plan for an initiative focused on change management for a corporation, non-profit organization or municipality. The team is to focus on an organization that is planning to execute a business initiative requiring change management. Objectives of the project are to: - Apply the knowledge gained in the course to an organizational setting - Accelerate development of the skills outlined above - Provide material for study in future delivery of this course The deliverables of team-based project will be a Change Management Plan (CMP) and an oral presentation of the plan to the class. The organization selected for the project may be a local, national or global company or not-for-profit organization. Below is described the process to be used in development of the CMP. The CMP should consist of a maximum of fifteen typed, double-spaced pages of narrative in 12-point font. Below are listed the projects and team members: Home Depot Project Team Members Kristy Muccini Magda Marczyk Raytheon SAP Implementation Jeff Grandmaison Bill Queenan United Way Marie Peeler The team is required to use the process and structure below. Change Management Plan 1. Purpose a. The purpose of the Project is to have student teams apply knowledge about executive leadership and management to an actual organization. This project requires students: I) to assess the leadership climate of an organization; 2) to diagnose problematic areas; 3) to plan changes in leaders, their groups, and the situations they find themselves in, and 4) to plan for follow-up evaluation of their proposals. The expected output is Change Management Plan (CMP), broadly organized as shown below. b. Students are required to assess one or more aspects of a company's executive management system using the “8 Step Assessment Tool” to guide analysis. The tool is available on the Blackboard. Teams of students or a committee of the whole in small classes will perform this assessment. Resulting CMPs are to be objective in nature, and supported by theory, research publications, and observation. The study must be performed from a positive point of view that seeks improved performance, rather than simply pointing out flaws without recommendations for improvement. c. Your purpose is to create a useful CMP that could be, and may be, implemented. The team may select a real organization/situation, or a case study provided by the professor. d. The CMP may focus on an entire company, or on one of its primary functional areas such as operations, marketing, logistics, finance, HR, or IT. If a functional area is chosen, particular emphasis must be placed on practical integration of your CMP with other units at the same level. Do not go below the vice-presidential level when building the action portion of your CMP. e. Before proceeding with your term project, coordinate your topic selection with the professor. Additionally, the professor may ask teams to provide brief progress reports during the course. 2. Format a. Setting the problem. Describe the problem you have chosen to study, and list the three or four critical issues that must be solved to fix the problem. In this section, you are charged with initially "setting the problem," to include identifying its measures, and its short and long-term effects. Be sure to use the 8 Step Assessment Tool to structure your response. If you find no information about a specific element, you may either say no information is available, or cite a theory to support the probability of a certain element occurring. For example, if low quality, poor performance, or high costs are noted, one may cite an observation that employee confidence in the plan may be quite low. b. Critical Assessment. The intent of this section is to analyze the issues, integrate information needed to solve the problem, and present your wellsupported opinion on the topic. Most importantly, it should conclude with the ramifications of your observations, and an opinion on the best decision to be made. Quality and depth of thought, as well as the need for a succinct, organized presentation, should drive length. Consider yourself to be a consultant whose fee depends on both convincing a CEO/Board of Directors, yet not wasting their valuable time. Clarity of thought, brevity of expression, and simplicity of recommended actions are desirable. c. CMP Presentation. In this section, you are to present your detailed plan to correct organizational problems you encountered in your research. Here, the key is to take a long-range, yet pragmatic, position. Again, use the 8 Step Assessment Tool as your standard. If you have already used the tool, you will know immediately which deficiencies need to be addressed within the overall context of your assessment. Be sure to justify each element of your recommendations since assertions are not considered sound bases for executive decision-making. 3. Grading Criteria a. 30%: Setting the problem 1. Did you identify the important (not trivial) factors contributing to "the problem” by using the 8 Step Assessment Tool? 2. Did you describe “the problem” clearly 3. Did you formulate 2-4 issue questions whose answers would help solve "the problem?" 4. Did you identify measures & standards that must be met to solve "the problem?" 5. Did you support your observations with appropriate theory and facts? b. 30%: Critical Assessment 1. Did you use broad management thinking & consider all relevant aspects of the problem? 2. Is your approach consistent with the elements of Kotter’s 8 steps? 3. Are your recommendations pragmatic in light of the organization's leadership, its culture, and the constraints of resources, ethics, law, and competition? c. 40%: Oral Presentation 1. Does the paper follow a logical format? 2. Is it clear and succinct? 3. Are you specific? 4. Are there spelling, grammatical or typing errors? 5. Did you incorporate professional presentation tools; e.g., PowerPoint? Attribution: This syllabus is based on the valuable work done by Andrew McLean, Adjunct Professor of Management at Bentley College, in the course entitled “Managing Organizational Change”. The course has been modified to focus on business results derived from successful change management. Class Date Discussion Readings & Assignments in Preparation for Class Topics June 7/11 1 9 AM > 5 PM 7/18 2 9 AM > 5 PM 7/25 3 9 AM > 5 PM 8/1 4 9 AM > 5 PM 5 8/2 9 AM > Noon Assignments Due It is essential that you read Leading Change by John P. Kotter and submit prior to July 11th the analyses of two cases listed below for class #1 These two cases = 10% of your final grade. Course Introduction: Introductions Syllabus Texts Projects Reasons for failure Kotter & Audios Case discussion Next class Leadership: Tichy Collins Case discussion Leading Change by John P. Kotter "Sears Auto Centers," HBS Case No. 394-009 John Smithers at Sigtek." HBS Case No. 491-035 The Transformational Leader by Noel M. Tichy Jim Collins, "Level 5 Leadership..” James C. Collins, “Building Your Company’s Vision” "Andrea Jung: Empowering Avon Women," HBS Case No. 406-095 "Iggy's Bread of the World," HBS Case No. 801-292 Cameron & Green – Chapter #4 (Leadership) – Peter Senge Change Without Pain, Eric Abrahamson "Gillette Singapore: Managing Global Business Integration on the Ground” “Wal-Mart's Sustainability Strategy” Planning & Strategy Abrahamson “The 11th Hour” ERM Model Case discussion Executing Strategy: Performance Management Balanced Scorecard Teams Project Management Wow Project New Strategy Without Disrupting Your Organization, Robert Kaplan and Eric Norton Cameron & Green – Chapter #2 (Team Change) Project Managers as Change Agents The Wow Project, Tom Peters Presentations of Change Mgmt. Plans (CMP) Home Depot Raytheon SAP Implementation United Way www.erm.com Case analyses for both Sears and Sigtek Case analyses for both Avon and Iggy’s Bread Case analyses for both Gillette & Wal-Mart CMP: Statement of Problem Performance Management: Balanced Scorecard www.thepalladiumgroup.com/about/hof/Pages/overview.aspx Submit Problem Definition for CMPs Change Management Plans: 45 minutes each