HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY FACULTY ASSEMBLY Gen Ed Curriculum Subcommittee of UCC (To select a box, highlight it and press “x”.) Proposal Type: Five themes category . . . . . . . “Special” 5 themes category. . 5 Themes with Cross Theme. UD Service Learning. . . . . . . UD Global Citizenship. . . . . . UD Research and writing. . . . GECS RECORD OF CURRICULUM ACTION AND REVIEW (RCAR FORM) [To be filled out by Proposal Author(s)] School/Colle ge: Liberal Arts Program : Course Alpha/#: SOC 3380 Proposed by: Mary Sheridan, Dan Morgan, Gordon Knowles, and Paul Tran Category or Type of UD course Upper Division Global Citizenship Title: Sociology Cross-Cultural Relations Record of GECS Action EMail: msheridan@hpu.edu Proposal received by GECS on: 12-1-06 Online reading Date: 12-7-06 1st Reading: Date: 12-13-06 Discussion: This is a very popular course to fulfill cross-cultural requirements in some current majors. In the new gen ed we think it will be popular as a global citizenship course. The course clearly has focused on race relations in the United States, but that might not be the appropriate lens for a global citizenship course. Is there something in the course that deals with the weakness of using the US as a case study? Or the problems of trying to understand cross-cultural issues in other countries from the perspective of the US? For example Americans either group all Muslims together or think divides between them are religious, missing the political dimension the sectarian conflict has in the middle east. We see that Uganda is used in a film but more international examples are needed. Suggestion from GECS members: use a text or supplementary text that draws on world cultures. Action: Mary will go back to the instructors with these comments and submit a revised proposal for a second reading. Marc Gilbert and Chris Fung willing to suggest relevant readings. 106747146 Page 1 of 13 File last saved on 3/3/2016 Second reading 2-16-07 Discussion Action Third reading Discussion a. This is a second reading. Proposers were not present. b. Members noted that changes had been made especially to the application portion that addressed some of the comments. However the syllabus did not appear to have been modified. The proposal and syllabus include a second text which addresses a set of issues outside of the context of the United States (the book by Memmi) but this is listed on the syllabus as an optional text (the other option being "Black Like Me") which seems to again de-emphasize non-US course content in favor of US situations. Perhaps Memmi could be identified on the syllabus as more central to the course content (it isn't actually mentioned at all in the week-by-week list of lecture topics and readings, for instance). c. The topics in the week-by-week description are very broad. One could argue that some of these might include non-US perspectives or case studies, but this is not indicated clearly on the syllabus. Perhaps the syllabus might be made a little more detailed so that we can see some examples of where the lecturer plans to address non-US case studies. d. Some of the videos listed on the syllabus do indeed refer to non-US situations but again, there is no indication on the syllabus in what way these are integrated into the course content, or whether they are simply added on to provide a brief contrast with the main ambit of the course content which in the absence of evidence to the contrary seems to continue to be heavily UScentric. e. Chris Fung was concerned that we be careful to avoid the idea that simply invoking "multi-culturalness" in the United States addresses intercultural relations on a global scale. Understanding racism in the US involves some discussion of the idea of otherness which may indeed be couched in the language of foreignness, but the dominant political, social and cultural structures remain those of the United States. Anti-Indian racism in Mexico or anti-black racism in Brazil are very different things from anti-Indian or antiblack racism in the United States. f. The course has potential to fit well into this category and we would like to be able to approve it at our last meeting to accept proposals for the Fall 2008 implementation. Chris volunteered to work with the proposers to address these concerns in advance of the final meeting. 3-12-07 A new syllabus was submitted to address concerns from last time. Professor Paul Tran was present. The updated syllabus looked a lot better and addressed GECS concerns. Action The GECS recommends that the UCC approve the course for Global Citizenship ATTACH PROPOSAL AFTER RCAR SIGNATURE SHEET ON NEXT PAGE 106747146 Page 2 of 13 File last saved on 3/3/2016 HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY FACULTY ASSEMBLY GENERAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM SUBCOMMITTEE OF UCC GECS RECORD OF CURRICULUM ACTION AND REVIEW SIGNATURE SHEET Liberal Arts SOC 3380: Cross-Cultural Relations College/School Course # & Title Mary Sheridan Program Chair for Curriculum Area offering Course 12-1-06 Print Name Date Les Correa Academic Dean 3-20-07 Print Name Date Catherine Unabia GECS Chair 3-12-07 Print Name Date Curt Powley UCC Chair 106747146 3-16-07 Print Name Page 3 of 13 Date File last saved on 3/3/2016 HAWAII PACIFIC UNIVERSITY GENERAL EDUCATION CURRICULUM SUBCOMMITTEE OF UCC GENERAL EDUCATION UPPER DIVISION GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP COURSE APPLICATION Course Alpha/#: SOC 3380 Title: Cross-Cultural Sociology Student Learning Outcomes Required Gen Ed Learning Outcome #1: Students should be able to apply their understanding of ethical systems and models to develop and demonstrate a conscious value system as individuals, students, professionals and citizens. [V&C 7] Relevance to course content—provide examples of assignments, course readings, supplementary materials, or in-class activities from the sample syllabus that will help students to achieve this learning outcome and/or demonstrate their ability to do so. The course mission states: “Students will be challenged to examine how these issues affect their lives at a personal level, and also to understand how their own attitudes and behaviors, in turn, affect these issues at a societal level.” Much of this examination and understanding occurs in classroom discussion and in the journal or term paper. In addition, readings from text, auxiliary readings, and global awareness documentaries/ films encourage students to examine dominant/minority relations in the US and other world cultures, through exposure to concepts such as assimilation and cultural pluralism. Student Assessment—According to the sample syllabus, how will the instructor assess whether students have achieved this outcome? How will achievement of this learning outcome be reflected in the grade for the course? Students are graded on class participation/discussion/quizzes/journal or paper, and answering review question at the end of each chapter from Parrillo’s text. These review questions include reflective, value-related ones, e.g., “How would you answer someone who claims foreigners are changing American culture” (Ch. 2), discussion of functional and conflict perspectives (Ch. 3), issues of mass media (Ch. 4), etc. The kinds of questions that students might be asked to reflect on in their journals or paper include, “Identify a time when you have experienced prejudice or discrimination.” “Reflect on your own ethnic heritage and how it fits into the ‘American mosaic.” “What do you think John Griffin would experience if he conducted his experiment today? In Hawaii?” Similarly, students will be asked to explore misconceptions of colonized Tunisians in “The Colonizer and the Colonized” and provide analyses of similar portrayals in Hawaii and other regions of the world. 106747146 Page 4 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Required Gen Ed learning outcome #2: Students should understand a range of meanings for concepts associated with individual and social ethics such as rights and responsibilities, justice and impartiality, citizenship and social responsibility. [V&C 8] Relevance to course content—provide examples of assignments, course readings, supplementary materials, or in-class activities from the sample syllabus that will help students to achieve this learning outcome and/or demonstrate their ability to do so. Rights and responsibilities are reflected in Parillo text topics such as, “Personal Troubles and Public Issues (Ch. 1), material on social class and intergroup conflict in Ch. 2, prejudice and discrimination (Chs. 4 and 5), affirmative action (Ch. 5), dominant group and minority group relations (Ch. 6), and “current ethnic issues” in Ch. 7. Black Like Me presents a graphic and gripping illustration of what life was like under segregation, raising issues of human rights, justice and institutional and social discrimination. Material about justice and impartiality is included in Parillo, especially in Ch. 5 on discrimination, Ch. 6 on dominant-minority relations, and Ch. 7 on current intergroup issues in the U.S. Material about citizenship as a cause of discrimination (i.e., immigration status) is covered throughout the course, beginning with Parillo Ch. 1’s discussion of “the stranger as a social phenomenon.” Material tending to promote “good citizenship” and “global citizenship” includes specifics on overcoming prejudice (Parillo Ch. 4). More centrally, though, the course is oriented towards raising an affective as well as intellectual consciousness in students of the nature and consequences of injustice, and thus inculcating in them a sense of social responsibility and encouraging them to take action for improving relationships among groups of people and the community they live in. The Griffin book is especially effective in this regard. Reading and discussing Memmi’s “Colonizer and the Colonized” challenges students to place themselves in situations of the “colonizer who accepts” and the “colonizer who refuses” and analyze similar situations that occur in our social world today. These themes are reinforced through journaling or the term paper. Student Assessment—According to the sample syllabus, how will the instructor assess whether students have achieved this outcome? How will achievement of this learning outcome be reflected in the grade for the course? Students are graded on class participation/discussion/ quizzes and answering review questions at the end of each chapter from Parrillo’s text in their journal as well as the thoughtful quality of the journal/paper. Questions that students might be asked to reflect on in their journals include, “What responsibilities do you have to reduce prejudice and discrimination locally, nationally, globally?” and “What do you understand about ‘social justice,’ and how can you work towards achieving it?” Other questions posed include, “What misconceptions do people hold about your culture? How would you respond to these questions in the context of what Memmi wrote about colonization?” Required Gen Ed learning outcome #3: Investigate the roles that race, ethnicity, class, power, belief systems, and gender play in past and present cultural systems. [WC 3] Relevance to course content—provide examples of assignments, course readings, supplementary materials, or in-class activities from the sample syllabus that will help 106747146 Page 5 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 students to achieve this learning outcome and/or demonstrate their ability to do so. Parillo deals with these entities as follows: Race: The concept is introduced in Ch. 1, and included in discussions throughout the text on prejudice, discrimination, etc. Griffin, of course, deals extensively with race. The videos, “Eyes on the Prize I and II” also present information about the 1960’s civil right movement. Ethnicity: There is considerable overlap in the discussion of race and ethnicity. Ethnic stratification specifically is the subject of Ch. 3. Class: Class is introduced under ethnic stratification in Ch. 3, and is included in discussions throughout the text on intergroup relations. Power: Power is discussed implicitly in connection with discrimination, and explicitly as a factor in majority-minority relations. This is underscored in Griffin, where the dominant white majority is shown as having the power to maintain a system of dominance over the black minority and concepts of institutional and social discrimination are discussed. Belief systems: Prejudice is presented as a belief system that must be taken seriously (and changed). Belief systems and their interaction with intergroup relations in the U.S. is especially discussed in Ch. 7, “The Ever-Changing U.S. Mosaic.” The course uses one of two films relating to prejudice: “Crash” about race relations in Los Angeles and “Color of Fear.” Gender: Gender is discussed as interacting with other statuses. Women, although numerically a majority, are considered by sociology to be a minority, and so discussions of majority-minority relations (Parillo Ch. 6) apply to women. The course uses the videos, “Iron Jawed Angels” about the women’s suffrage movement and “Killing us Softly” about mass media portrayals of women. The video “Tough Guise” shows mass media portrayals of male violence. The videos “Story of Grace” on female child soldiers in Uganda and “Tomorrow We Will Finish” (female child labor in Nepal) are also often used. All of these topics are appropriate for the journal or paper. Student Assessment—According to the sample syllabus, how will the instructor assess whether students have achieved this outcome? How will achievement of this learning outcome be reflected in the grade for the course? Students are graded on class participation/discussion/ quizzes and answering review questions at the end of each chapter from Parrillo’s text, and on their journal or paper. Questions that students might be asked to reflect on in their journals include, “What social class are you in, and how has this affected your opportunities in life?” “What would a culture without gender distinctions look like?” “How do mass media define gender roles?” “Identify what roles a man or woman should take according to the past and to the present societal norms.” “Where would you most likely place yourself in Parrillo’s discrimination chart? Are you more of a non-prejudiced discriminator? A nonprejudiced, non-discriminator? What social forces have influenced your position?” Required Gen Ed learning outcome #4: Understand the impact of the process of globalization from a historical or cultural perspective. [GS 7] Relevance to course content—provide examples of assignments, course readings, 106747146 Page 6 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 supplementary materials, or in-class activities from the sample syllabus that will help students to achieve this learning outcome and/or demonstrate their ability to do so. Globalization is discussed as a cause of changes in the U.S. in Parillo Ch. 7 and the discussion of the cross-cultural time line is developed. Videos may be used such as “Invisible children,” dealing with child soldiers in Uganda. Student Assessment—According to the sample syllabus, how will the instructor assess whether students have achieved these outcomes? How will achievement of this learning outcome be reflected in the grade for the course? Students are graded on class participation/discussion, answering review question at the end of each chapter from Parrillo’s text. and the thoughtful quality of their paper or journal entries. Questions that students might be asked to reflect on in their journals include, “What changes do you see in the dominant U.S. culture as America becomes more diverse?” “How is HPU a model for an increasingly globalized nation?” Students are also asked to bring in newspaper clippings from around the world that reflect topics discussed in the course. Historical perspectives on racial categorization are also examined, including those developed by Swedish botanist Linnaeus, and how these categories have been socially perpetuated in light of evidence that they are biologically flawed. Additional Questions: Explain how this course addresses the issue of “global citizenship.” It is crucial that students be sociologically informed and culturally literate as they pursue degrees in myriad academic fields. That is, they are aided in becoming “global citizens” by the ability to look beyond their own embedded notions of what is “right” or “normal,” and consider the ways that other societies approach the problems of living. This course offers a critical examination of social phenomena often accepted as natural or normal, by delving into how these phenomena are embedded in history, politics and economy. Does this course address the relationship between the local and the global? If so, explain how. (Answering “no” does not disqualify the course as a global citizenship course. The question is meant to encourage thinking about making such connections when applicable). The discussion of the concept cross-culture time line develops this relationship. Some videos, such as “Story of Grace” and ”Invisible Children” show international themes and these are related to local issues and initiatives in class discussion. The Parrillo text provides a foundation of sociological theory and constructs, while the Griffin and Memmi texts provide vehicles for students to scrutinize how these concepts have come into play in global communities throughout the world. 106747146 Page 7 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Hawai'i Pacific University SOC 3380 A/Cross-Cultural Relations Instructor: __________________ Office location________________ Office Hours: ______________________ Office Phone: ___________ Day/time of class: ___________________ Catalog Description: A course that addresses problems of residents of multiethnic societies and immigrants and sojourners in a foreign country. Topics include how characteristics of the individual, group, situation, and host society affect transcultural relations; and principles which maximize cross-cultural adjustment, work effectiveness, and successful interaction. Special focus on the indigenous population and immigrant experiences in Hawai’i and United States. Pre-requisites: WRI 1200 and any two social science courses. Required Texts: Parrillo, Vincent N. 2005 Understanding Race and Ethnic Relations, second edition. Allyn & Bacon ISBN: 0-205-41482-6 Memmi, Albert: The Colonizer and the Colonized Beacon Press, 1991. ISBN: 0807003018 Course Mission Statement and Goals: This course will serve to familiarize students with historical, economic and cultural developments that have influenced our attitudes and behaviors regarding race and ethnicity in the United States of America and abroad. Students will be encouraged to identify, develop and use their “Sociological Imaginations” when examining these issues. Students will also learn how these developments and subsequent problems relate to sociological theory. Students will be challenged to examine how these issues affect their lives at a personal level, and also to understand how their own attitudes and behaviors, in turn, affect these issues at a societal level. By the end of the course, students will be able to: Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts presented in class related to culture 106747146 Page 8 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Identify the theories and theorists associated with the concepts presented Evaluate and synthesize theories presented in class in terms of utility in particular situations in everyday life (workplace, government, etc.) Develop a working knowledge of terminology such as hegemony, racism, sexism, ethnocentrism, discrimination, pluralism, multiculturalism, etc. Understand, locally, nationally, and internationally, the effects of colonialization on the colonizer and colonized. Some of the areas that will be addressed in class: Culture in Sociological Perspective Theoretical and historical positions as they relate to race and ethnicity Cultural Diversity Global perspective Cross-cultural perspective Indigenous perspective Race relationship Colonialization The Five Themes of the HPU General Education Core: World Cultures represents an ability to relate to people of different races and ethnicities, and understanding cultural interactions. In this course, we examine how those relationships have been shaped by social phenomena such as globalization, cultural diffusion and colonization. Values and Choices takes into account community responsibility, lifelong learning, and making moral decisions with social responsibility. Cultural awareness is integral to these choices. Global Systems refers to an understanding of contemporary civilizations and solving complex problems. This is key when learning about concepts such as culture, dominant vs. subordinate groups, norms and sanctions, in the United States, the Pacific, and in the world at large. Research and Epistemology includes solving complex problems, including complex quantitative and qualitative problems. For your research papers, we will discuss the ways social scientists do research, as well as the results of their research. We will also spend time reviewing sociological research and cultural bias, in the context of writing your research papers. Communication involves performing as a member of a team, and the ability to think critically. Communication varies across culture, and participation can take many forms, and includes punctuality, submitting assignments on time, and participating in class discussions. If approved: This course meets the Upper Division Global Citizenship Requirement. General Education themes addressed in this course are as follows: 106747146 Page 9 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Students should be able to apply their understanding of ethical systems and models to develop and demonstrate a conscious value system as individuals, students, professionals and citizens. [V&C 7] Students should understand a range of meanings for concepts associated with individual and social ethics such as rights and responsibilities, justice and impartiality, citizenship and social responsibility. [V&C 8] Students will be challenged to investigate the roles that race, ethnicity, class, power, belief systems, and gender play in past and present cultural systems. [WC 3] Students who are successful in the course will understand the impact of the process of globalization, cultural diffusion and colonization from historical and cultural perspectives. [GS 7] Grading: Attendance & Class Participation: (5 points per class (28) = 130 points) Students are expected to attend each class prepared and actively participate. I highly value student-instructor interaction and studentstudent interaction. I will be relying heavily on group exercises, interactive activities, and the use of documentary/video as methods for teaching this course. This is a course that can generate a great deal of feelings and emotions. For that reason, it is imperative that contributions to class be done in a mindful, respectful and professional academic manner. Refer to the handout on good listening skills and the various types of intelligence. Seven journal entries: (10 points per journal entry = 70 points) Each journal entry submitted will be at least 2 pages in length. Students will be responding to questions posed in class and from both texts. Writing should be thoughtful and substantive. Journal entries are due at the beginning of class period on the due date. Refer to the handout on journaling. Late journals will not be accepted. Seven in-class quizzes: (10 points per quiz = 70 points) Quizzes will be pertinent to the material covered in class and in the assigned reading from the text. Cumulative Final Exam. (100 points) Note: material presented in class presentations may be included in the final exam. Points will be averaged and the following grade percentages will be used to calculate final grades: 106747146 Page 10 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Grade A B C D F Scale 360-400 320-359 280-319 240-279 <239 This course adheres strictly to HPU’s policy on academic honesty, and high ethical standards are expected of students. Course Content Session 1: Welcome/Introduction/Syllabus/Course expectations Session 2: Minorities: a Sociological Perspective (What are minorities? Minority-majority issues worldwide) Read for today’s class: Parrillo Ch. 1, “The Study of Minorities.” Session 3: Minority groups: racial and ethnic perspectives in the US and worldwide Read for today’s class: Memmi—Introduction (Jean-Paul Sartre) Session 4: Minorities: Intergroup relations in the US and worldwide Quiz 1. Journal 1 due. Video: Color of Fear (a group of diverse men confront the effect of racism in their lives), or From Hawaii to the Holocaust: A Shared Moment in History (how two very different peoples--Jews and Americans of Japanese Ancestry--shared a common experience as victims of governmentsanctioned oppression, racism, and prejudice during World War II) Session 5: Culture: The concept. Functions of culture. Diversity of cultures worldwide. What we can learn from other cultures. Read for today’s class: Parrillo Ch. 2, “The Role of Culture” Session 6: Culture: Minority Integration—not just a US problem. Video: Eyes on the Prize I and II (U.S. civil rights movement) or Amnesty Interactive (produced by Amnesty International; growth of the concept of human rights, prisoners of conscience) Session 7: Culture: Is there a white culture? White privilege. Session 8: Cultural change: conditions producing it, effects of globalization in the US and worldwide Quiz 2. Journal 2 due. 106747146 Page 11 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Session 9: Ethnic stratification: Strutural conditions leading to ethnic stratification in the US and worldwide Read for today’s class: Parrillo Ch. 3, “Ethnic Stratification” Video: Social class (systems of stratification worldwide) or Interracial Marriage Session 10: Ethnic stratification: Social class in the US and worldwide Session 11: Ethnic stratification: Intergroup conflict in the US and worldwide Session. 12: Ethnic stratification in the US and worldwide. Quiz 3. Journal 3 due. Session 13: Prejudice: Psychological and Sociological theories Read for today’s class: Parrillo Ch. 4, “Prejudice” Session 14: Prejudice: Stereotyping and the media Video: Crash (stereotyping of various minority groups) or Killing us Softly III (portrayal of women in the media) or Tough Guise (mass media portrayal of male violence) Session 15: Prejudice: How can it be reduced in the US and worldwide? Video: Class Divided (classic on inducing and overcoming prejudice in a 3rd grade classroom) Session 16: Prejudice: personal experiences Quiz 4. Journal 4 due. Session 17: Discrimination: terminology and levels Read for today’s class: Parillo Ch. 5, “Discrimination” Session 18: Discrimination—social and institutional aspects in the US and worldwide Session 19: Discrimination—racial profiling affirmative action Session 20: Discrimination: sexual discrimination and harassment. Quiz 5. Journal 5 due. Video: Iron-Jawed Angels (women’s sufferage) or Shortchanging Girls, Shortchanging America (problems girls face in schools); or That’s Why I’m Working, or Tomorrow we will Finish (both about child labor internationally) Session 21: Dominant-Minority relations in the US and worldwide 106747146 Page 12 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016 Read for today’s class: Parillo Ch. 6, “Dominant-Minority Relations” and Memmi part 1, “Portrait of the colonizer” Session 22: Dominant-Minority relations: Colonization Read for today’s class: Memmi part 2, “Portrait of the Colonized” Video: Africans: A Triple Heritage 4: Tools of Exploitation (the colonial heritage in Africa) Session 23: Dominant-Minority relations: The heritage of colonization in Hawaii Quiz 6. Journal 6 due. Read for today’s class: Memmi: “Conclusion” and “Afterword” Session 24: Ethnic diversity in the U.S. and abroad: The changing face of ethnicity and current ethnic issues Read for today’s class: Parillo Ch. 7, “The Ever-Changing U.S. Mosaic” Session 25: Ethnic diversity in the U.S.: the challenges of the immigrant Video: We all came to America (American immigrant experience) Session 26: Ethnic diversity in the U.S.: challenges in the workplace Session 27: Last day of class. What can we conclude about cross-cultural relations? Quiz 7. Journal 7 due. Session 28: FINAL EXAM 106747146 Page 13 of 13 This file last saved on March 3, 2016