review of the professor james houghton paper on slavery

advertisement
Slavery
A paper delivered by Professor James Houghton of George Washington
University, Washington DC and The Smithsonian Institution at Liverpool John
Moores University, on Thursday 23 March 2000.
Reviewed By Clare Horrocks, Edge Hill College
Looking at the misunderstandings and mythology surrounding discourses of
slavery, this paper was delivered to American Studies students following a course
entitled ‘Black Atlantic’. However, as with many of the projects undertaken by the
American Studies Centre, there were also a number of other visitors who were not
students at the university. It was a friendly and informal afternoon enjoyed by all.
Contextualised within the eighteenth and nineteenth century, it was a paper which
sought to explore how the legacy of slavery can be seen to provide a foundation for
many of the concepts surrounding race in modern society. Professor Houghton
undermined the myths that slavery only existed from the 1840s until its cessation in
1865, drawing out a history of oppression, richly supplemented by OHPs of charts
and maps, tables and statistics which corroborated the continual oppression of black
American slaves. Yet despite this extended history of slavery in America’s history,
Americans today, he argues, are loath to directly refer to the term ‘slavery’. From
direct experience, conveyed through a number of anecdotes, he exemplified how this
tendency continues to persist today. Taking Thomas Jefferson as an example of how
idyllic myths are formed, he proposed to the students that there was a vital
contradiction in the representation of a man who wrote the Declaration of
Independence, advocating “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness”, when he was in
actual fact a slave owner himself. Jefferson was raised at Monticello, Virginia, where
there is now a booming tourist industry with plantation tours and actors dressed in
colonial costume. There is a history behind the family home which is shared by both
the Jeffersons and the numerous slaves who worked there, yet tour guides fail to
acknowledge their existence, even when directly questioned. There is a discourse of
slavery which is hidden, Professor Houghton argues, behind the embarrassment of a
nation which is still trying to accept that it is this history of oppression which lies
behind many of the problems of race today.
What was particularly interesting was his discussion of the divide between North
and South and the distribution of industries which facilitated the slave/master
relationship. Many people associate the slave trade with sugar and cotton
plantations, but this was not the only industry in which slaves were employed. In
the eighteenth century many Northern states like Virginia were involved with slaves
and there was certainly no cotton or sugar in these regions! Their trade was tobacco,
grown around the Chesapeake Bay and the colony of Maryland. Down in the
Carolinas slaves were used in the production and growth of rice. It is only as we
shift into the nineteenth century that we see a shift in trade and subsequently the
occupations of the slaves. With growth came a shift in geographical location down
into the Deep South, into a climate which facilitated the growth of cotton. By 1850
cotton constituted 57.5% of all US exports, as opposed to only 7.1% in 1800. Despite
the decline in the slave trade in the Northern states after 1808, many of the buildings
and institutions which still exist today, have been founded on the money derived
from the slave trade, a legacy of their involvement; buildings such as Brown
University, Rhode Island.
To conclude, Professor Houghton reinforced how when one starts to talk about
slavery, we reveal a whole group of inconsistencies in its depiction. Yet slavery’s
legacy is still very much with us, playing a part in our living history, reminding us
that we must take account of the human impact it had, and still has, on many
Americans. Plantations re-enacting and role playing the segregation and oppression
forget that they are reawakening memories which stimulate emotions of anger,
hostility and sadness. We must not forget the history of this race of people, learn not
to be afraid to stand up and acknowledge discourses of slavery, for it is their legacy
which continues to provide the foundation for today’s concept of race.
****
A stimulating paper which prompted many questions from both students and staff
alike, may we extend our thanks to Professor Houghton and his partner Dr Lois
Houghton and wish them a safe journey back to Washington.
Download