WWII Propaganda Paper (Due Jan 27/28th)
Learning objectives:
Students will learn how to take an argumentative stance and frame that stance
within the Aristotelian triangle.
Students will learn how to analyze both sides of an argument, anticipate rebuttals,
and address possible rebuttals while writing their paper.
Students will apply their knowledge of semiotics by using it to analyze WWII
propaganda.
Directions: We’ve done some semiotic analysis, and now it’s time to apply it. You will
be writing a six-page persuasive essay that describes the techniques used by both the U.S.
and Germany for their propaganda during WWII and evaluates, using both your
analysis and historical evidence, which country’s was more effective. You must
include three analyzed examples from each side. The pictures of these examples must
be included in the body of your paper but must not exceed an area of 2”x 2.” The pictures
will not count against your final page total. Paper must be written in MLA format and
include Five Cited Sources.
Sample Outline:
I.
Introduction to use of propaganda in WWII; statement about which side
did better (thesis).
II.
Discussion of U.S. techniques and strategies
A. Intro to U.S. propaganda
B. Discussion of first example
1. Function of text
2. Syntagm
3. Paradigm
4. Media effects model that best fits
C. Discussion of second example
D. Discussion of third example
E. Conclusion of U.S. propaganda
III.
Discussion of German techniques and strategies
IV.
Comparison and Contrast of both/Relation to historical events
What techniques were most impactful?
V.
Conclusion: state the winner; how can studying this propaganda make us
more aware individuals today?
Grading:
Grading:
100-90%
Paper is six pages in length, and creates a persuasive argument using analyzed
textual evidence from at least five cited sources. Body of paragraphs match the topic
sentences which develop the thesis. Paper is written in the academic voice and uses
sophisticated syntax and diction. Paper addresses both sides of the argument but does not
ride the fence. Conclusion effectively answers a level three question such as the one
posed in the sample outline.
90-80%
Paper is six pages in length, and creates a persuasive argument using analyzed
textual evidence from at least five cited sources. Two or less paragraphs have focus
issues. Paper often slips into an informal voice and uses many simple sentences that are
alike. Paper addresses both sides of the argument but does not ride the fence.
Conclusion effectively answers a level three question such as the one posed in the sample
outline.
80-70%: Could be any of the following:
Paper creates a semi-persuasive argument based on opinion rather than facts and
data. More than two paragraphs have focus issues. Paper has many grammatical
mistakes and is written entirely in the informal voice. Perhaps too few sources are used
in analysis. Paper may not take a strong stance or create a persuasive argument.
Conclusion restates body of paper but fails to discuss importance of topic.
70-60%
Paper creates a non-persuasive argument using no secondary sources. Paper
appears to be pulled entirely out of one’s mind rather than out of the sources. Paper does
not create a logical argument of any sort. Many grammatical and formatting errors are
present, and the paper fails to fulfill the requirements of the assignment.