MIDLANDS STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND COMMUNICATION BAEH 202: AFRICAN LITERATURE Offered by: Cuthbert Tagwirei tagwireic@msu.ac.zw 0912118209 0914309307 Module synopsis The module is designed to introduce students to the works of some writers who have made significant contributions to the development of literature in Africa. It explores the engagement of the African literary works with key issues such as African history, slavery, colonialism, gender, postcolonial politics and the construction of nationhood. Writers to be used for purposes of illustration include Chinua Achebe, Ngugi wa Thiong’o, Ayi Kwei Armah, Buchi Emecheta, Ferdinand Oyono and Tsitsi Dangarembga. It will be particularly important to note how the literature has developed as a unique category, at times challenging and departing from Western forms and concerns. Through lecture, research, discussion, in-class activities and formal writing, students will learn the key areas under African literature. Topics of study 1. Perceiving African Literature 1.1. Chinua Achebe- Hopes and Impediments 1.2. Chinua Achebe- Morning yet on Creation Day 1.3. Chinweizu et al- Decolonizing African Literature 1.4. Ngugi wa Thiong’o- Decolonizing the Mind 1.5. Ngugi wa Thiong’o- Writers in Politics 2. Images of Africa 2.1. Joseph Conrad- Heart of Darkness 2.2. Chinua Achebe- Things Fall Apart 2.3. Ayi Kwei Armah- Two Thousand Seasons 3. Tradition and Modernity 3.1. Okot p’Bitek- Song of Lawino 3.2. Wole Soyinka- The Lion and the Jewel 3.3. Ama Ata Aidoo- The Dilemma of a Ghost 4. Varied Colonial Experiences 4.1. Ferdinand Oyono- Houseboy 4.2. Ezekiel Mphahlele- Down Second Avenue 4.3. Luis Honwana- We Killed Mangy Dog and Other Stories 5. Representing African Womanhood 5.1. Tsitsi Dangarembga- Nervous Conditions 5.2. Mariama Ba- So Long a Letter 5.3. Chimamanda Adichie- Purple Hibiscus 6. Re-inventing the African Nation 6.1. Pepetela- Mayombe. 6.2. Alan Paton- Cry Beloved Country 6.4. Sembene Ousmane- God’s Bits of Wood 7. Post-Colonial Africa 7.1. Chinua Achebe- Anthills of the Savannah 7.2. Ayi Kwei Armah- The Beautiful Ones Are Not Yet Born 7.3. Ngugi wa Thiong’o- Devil on the Cross Objectives Students should be able to: i) Familiarize themselves with texts and concerns of African literature through reading fiction and critical works by Chinweizu, Fanon, Achebe, Ngugi and Rodney, among others; ii) Note the variations in African literary works from different geographical places; iii) Problematise in discussions and formal writing the forms and concerns of African literature and iv) Produce original interpretations of texts, employing the theoretical insights and analytical tools they acquired through reading and classroom discussions. Assessment Questions relating to this module will appear in the final examination taken by students. The questions will be based on the material from lectures and readings. Students will be expected to answer THREE questions from a total of six in the examination. One major assignment and/or in-class test; and one group assignment will be written during the semester. Group assignment mark will be on the basis of individual participation during presentations and submission of a write-up. All assignments will be handed in and signed for, personally, in class on the due date and collected in the same manner when they are ready for collection. Students will be allocated groups and assignments in class during the second or third lecture session of the semester only. Excuses will not be tolerated. Assignments and exams will be graded for: 1) evidence that you have closely analysed the text, 2) evidence of your familiarity with secondary sources, 3) originality and creativity in applying relevant concepts to textual analysis, 4) clarity, 5) organisation and style. Students should attend all lectures and participate in the proceedings. Every lecture session, students should each bring at least three questions generated by the concerns for that day, and be prepared to pose them for the class. Participation will contribute 10% of the final mark. Course work constitutes 30% of the student’s overall grading. Students without a course work mark will automatically have their exam mark ‘nullified’. Assignments are to be typed- Times New Roman, font size 12, double spaced and justified. The cover page should display the following information in the order given: surname, first names, registration number, programme, module title, lecturer, topic question and due date. After the bibliography, the following information should be displayed in vertical form: analysis of texts, familiarity with secondary sources, originality, clarity and organisation. Students will sit for a THREE hour examination at the end of the semester. The examination constitutes 70% of the student’s final grading. Plagiarism will be considered as non-submission. The following constitute plagiarism: 1) Turning in as your own work a paper or part of a paper written by another. This would include but is not limited to work taken from another student, from a published author or from the internet. 2) Turning in a paper that includes unquoted and / or undocumented passages someone else wrote. 3) Including in a paper someone else’s original ideas, opinions, or research results without attribution. 4) Paraphrasing without attribution. 5) Turning the same paper in for credit in more than one class. 1. Perceiving African literature Chinweizu et al (1985) propose a criterion for defining African literature which considers the following aspects: i) The primary audience for whom the work is done. Clearly, the trio believes every text has a particular audience in mind and that audience can be deduced from the work. What is certain is that for African literature the audience should be none other than Africans. ii) The cultural and national consciousness expressed in the work, whether through the author’s voice of through the characters and their consciousness, habits and choice of words. iii) Nationality of writer- which should be determined by one’s passport. iv) The language in which work is done. What this entails is that texts written by Englishmen/women, even when set in Africa and comprising of African characters do not qualify as African texts. It is quite inevitable in such a case that the text will expose a decidedly Western consciousness and set of prejudices calculated to appeal to Western readers. Chinweizu et al’s criterion has not gone unchallenged. Debates about what constitutes African literature have extended to other critics including Achebe and Ngugi wa Thiong’o. Achebe believes the African writer’s task is to educate society about the African past by redeeming it from the denigration it has suffered in western discourses. Society should consequently regain belief in itself. This does not amount to romanticizing the past. Instead, the writer should portray Africa with its imperfections and convince his/her society that, even with those imperfections, the past was not one long night of savagery from which the Europeans delivered them. The African writer actually guides the society in reassessing itself in order to find out “where we went wrong, where the rain began to beat us.” (Achebe 1988:29) In Achebe’s view, African literature is about Africa. It has its basis the African view point of Africa and the world. In terms of language, Achebe is cautious. He suggests the use of “a language spoken by Africans on African soil.” He adds, “A language in which Africans write, justifies itself” (Achebe 1988:63.) Drawing from Marxist principles, Ngugi wa Thiong’o (1998) views the writer as a product of history, time and space. In this sense the writer does not have an existence outside his/her society. S/he belongs to a social class and is therefore a participant in the class struggle of his/her time. The line between writer and politician in Africa is thin. The writer is led into active politics from the moment he begins to articulate the people’s collective consciousness. This explains the reasons why various writers have been exiled or incarcerated at any given time in Africa. (Ngugi, Mphahlele, Biko, e.t.c.) Ngugi declares that writers should be honest and faithful in portraying the struggles around them. They must actively support the African working class struggles by taking their side against imperialists, whether black or white. On language, Ngugi does not subscribe to the use of foreign languages in African literature. He identifies English, French and Portuguese, among other European languages, as the languages of cultural imperialism. According to Ngugi (1987), language has a dual role, one of which is to carry and transmit a culture. From that perspective, it becomes difficult to justify the use of foreign languages in articulating an African consciousness. Apart from misrepresenting African experiences, using a foreign language serves to reinforce the inferiority complex of Africans who tend to regard their languages as incapable of communicating their messages. It also serves to enrich foreign languages at the expense of native languages. Ngugi (1987:4) states: “The choice of language and the use to which language is put is central to a people’s definition of themselves in relation to their natural and social environment.” This obviously poses a lot of problems for those who consciously choose to write in foreign languages. Readings* Achebe C. (1988) Hopes and Impediments: Selected Essays Chinweizu et al. (1985) Toward the Decolonisation of African Literature Ngugi wa Thiong’o. (1998) Writers in Politics Ngugi wa Thiong’o (1987) Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature 2. Images of Africa The proliferation of discourses on Africa from the ‘west’ has led to animated debates on African history, culture and religion, among others. The ‘west’ has largely portrayed Africa as a continent in its primitive state, still backward and uncivilized. As reflected in Ani (1994) Africa has been considered “a remote place at the extreme of the universe” (Homer 1700BC), “a timeless place in which there are no arts, letters or social organization” (Thomas Hobbes), “ahistorical” (Hegel) and a place of darkness (Trevor-Roper.) These discourses have been used to justify the enslavement and colonization of African people. Colonialism has been frequently regarded as a ‘civilizing’ mission while AfroAmericans are said to have benefited from slavery. Scholars, such as Fanon (1967) and Said (1991), have explained how ‘western’ discourses have always constructed the identities of the marginalized in a negative way, by attributing negative and inferior qualities to them. The education systems in European colonies served to reinforce the idea that Africans were inherently inferior to ‘whites’ and therefore fit for servitude. In fiction, the image of Africa and Africans as primitive and ahistoric is often reproduced in texts by European writers. The colour black is stressed upon as symbolic of evil. Some of the texts go to the extent of employing animal imagery to denigrate Africans. African literature has responded to Eurocentric discourses in various ways. Some African texts are records of the African past. Writers assign themselves the task of redeeming Africa from the demonisation by the ‘west.’ In such texts, Africa is not portrayed as static, but as a continent whose progress was stalled by the coming of whites. While some writers tend to romanticize Africa, others have been more pragmatic by representing Africa as a continent with its strengths as well as weaknesses. The three texts in this section provide varying images of the African continent. While some definitions of African literature will understandably exclude Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, there is need to explore its representation of Africa vis-à-vis texts by Armah and Achebe. Readings Ani M. (1994) Yurugu: An African-Centred Critique of European Cultural Thought and Behaviour Fanon F. (1967) “On National Culture” in The Wretched of the Earth Said E. (1991) Orientalism Ashcroft et al. (1995) The Empire Writes Back 3. Tradition and modernity African literature dealing with the effects of colonialism grapples with the issues of acculturation, cultural erosion and cultural hybridity, among others, The issue is dealt with from different angles. Some writers are outrightly against ‘western’ culture and its claims of progress and civilization, while some are quite accommodative. What is clear is that ‘western’ cultural invasion together with the infiltration of material luxuries poses a serious threat to traditional African values. Writers problematise the question of progress. They pose questions such as Do African cultures epitomize backwardness as is often suggested in ‘western’ discourses on Africa? What is progress? Is it synonymous with modernity? Is progress to be understood in terms of discarding tradition in favor of ‘western’ practices and values? In what way does modernity translate to real progress? Because of such burning concerns, some African writers resolve the conflict between tradition and modernity in favor of tradition. They write in defence of African customs and practices. In such cases ‘western’ practices and values are wholly ridiculed and rejected, while African ones are celebrated and romanticized. Such sentiments find explicit articulation in the Senghorian concept of Negritude which was out to demonize everything ‘western’ and celebrate everything African. This ideological school strove for the cultural reclamation of African values. Its members advocated for cultural purity. However not all African writers take this position. Some literary works attempt to strike a balance between tradition and modernity by celebrating only those values and practices of both cultures considered to be worthy of celebration. This goes in tandem with Homi Bhabha’s notion of liminality, the idea of the 'in-betweenness' or straddling two cultures. Writers who take this position do not overlook the shortcomings of African culture. They are willing to accept change as long as it leads to real progress. Students should note the formal devices used in texts (such as flat characterization and imagery) and evaluate how they are employed in relation to the issues raised. Readings Ngugi wa Thiong’o. (1994) Homecoming Bhabha H. (1994) The Location of Culture Biko S. I Write What I Like 4. Varied colonial experiences Colonialism in Africa took on different forms although the effects and processes have many similarities from one colony to the other. On paper the major colonial powers each had a policy designed for the effective administration of its colonies. The British mainly used indirect rule and multiculturalism, while the French and the Portuguese had versions of assimilation policies. It should be noted that these policies did not reflect what was on the ground. South Africa was colonized by the English and Dutch in the seventeenth century. There existed an unease power sharing arrangement between the two European nations until the 1940’s when the Afrikaner national party came to power. In 1948, racism was institutionalized in South Africa through the enactment of apartheid laws. Apartheid, euphemistically known as ‘separate development’ was a system of segregation which separated races in every aspect of social life. Apartheid was almost similar to American Jim Crow laws which separated ‘blacks’ and ‘whites’ in all spheres (work, education, residence, travel, recreation, e.t.c.) In South Africa, Africans were driven from their homes to township slums where they were to be confined and regulated through a system of pass laws indefinitely. Education, medical care and other public services were segregated, with Africans getting services inferior to the whites. In other parts of Africa, the British administered the colonies through traditional structures such as the chiefs and headmen’s councils. Segregation policies were also enacted, but they were at their worst in South Africa under the Afrikaners. Portugal sought to Europeanize the local populations and assimilate them into Portuguese culture in all its colonies. As a result segregation was not as explicit as in South Africa. It operated on a policy of racial integration. The French policy of assimilation promised French citizenship to the Africans. Africans were taught that, by adopting French language and culture, they could eventually become Frenchmen/women and enjoy the full benefits afforded French citizens. Education was therefore a vital tool for expanding French culture. African writers have in many ways exposed the follies of these policies. They expose the hypocrisy which underlies all colonial ventures. Ultimately, the African is inferior to the white man. Under this section students should note and evaluate the varied African colonial experiences as they are portrayed by African writers. They should be able to identify the differences and similarities in experience as they are reflected in texts by writers from different historical and geographical backgrounds. Readings Olaniyan T. (2005) “Africa Varied Colonial Legacies” in Schwarz H and Sangeeta R (Eds). A Companion to Postcolonial Studies 5. Representing African womanhood Postcolonial critics note that African literature by male writers largely dealing with nationalist issues has ignored the plight of women altogether or has used them in the service of their primary agendas to present Africa as stable and uniform prior to colonialism. Female characters in these texts play no significant roles. They are always on the fringes of both story and society. Writers like Achebe have been accused of male chauvinism in some of their works (e.g. Things Fall Apart) where female characters are portrayed as weak, passive and complacent in spite of the patriarchal oppression to which they are subjected. Female writers, informed by feminist principles have responded to such representations by exposing the injustices perpetrated against women in both colonial and post-colonial societies. They expose African women not only as victims of colonialism or post-independence African governments, but also as victims of patriarchal oppression in cultural and religious communities, be they Islamic or Christian. Unlike their male counterparts, the women suffer a double yoke and consequently fight from both fronts. However, the female characters are not the cynics portrayed by male writers. They are conscious of the patriarchal oppression and are determined to emancipate themselves. What is unique about the writings by African women is their representation of female agency and the celebration of female sexuality. Through education and alliances, among other strategies, female characters are shown to create their womanhood. Female writers are redefining womanhood and redressing the distorted images of women. This is not, however, to say that female writers completely ignore other issues beyond the plight of women or all male writers represent women unfairly in their texts. Moreso, some female writers reproduce gender inequalities in their texts. It will be interesting to note the variations in writings by African female writers in their representation of African womanhood while comparing them with their male counterparts. Readings Petersen K. “First Things First: Problems of a Feminist Approach to African Literature” in Ashcroft et al The Postcolonial Reader 6. Re-inventing the African nation Nationalism is not a new phenomenon to Africa. African nationhood predates colonialism. There are numerous examples of pre-colonial African nations such as Mali, Benin, Monomotapa, Great Zimbabwe and Ethiopia. The Berlin conference disrupted the process of nation-building by arbitrarily carving up Africa into numerous European colonies while disregarding traditional boundaries that existed prior to colonialism. Some critics have criticized the adoption of these arbitrary geographical boundaries after independence citing that the boundaries lack a social, political and linguistic basis. Needless, the spirit of nationalism was revived within the modern African states as a response to colonialism. African nationalists found it pragmatic to cultivate national sentiment within the imposed states. African writers were also part of the nationalist drive against imperialism. They did not only portray what was happening, but contributed to national sentiment through their works. Literature played a significant role in cultural nationalism. One characteristic of African nationalism is the invocation of the pre-colonial past by drawing from national myths, rituals, songs and symbols such as the Great Zimbabwe. The resurgence of nationalism also marked a symbolic return to the ancestral spirits for inspiration. These aspects constitute much of African nationalist literature. Apart from this is a focus on the dissolution of barriers to unity, which might be based on ethnicity, class or gender, for the purpose of nation-building. The liberation struggles across the continent marked the climax of nationalist expression. In the literary works by African writers there is part glorification of nationalism and part indictment of the nationalists who betrayed national sentiment. Socialist/Marxist doctrines informed most of the struggles against imperialism. In such cases, the nation was reconstructed from a socialist basis. The liberation war was perceived not as the struggle between races, but as a conflict between classes. Writers also reflected this dimension of nationalism, although some would advocate for nations whose foundation was religious or cultural. As will be noted in the following section, nationalism has its high and low moments. The attempt at nation-building did not always meet with success. Readings Cabral A.(1972) “Return to the Source” Fanon F. (1967) “On National Culture” in The Wretched of the Earth Amuta C. “Fanon, Cabral and Ngugi on National Liberation” in Ashcroft et al. A Postcolonial Reader 7. Post-colonial Africa In “Pitfalls of National Consciousness,” Fanon highlighted the follies that befall African nations after the attainment of political independence. Fanon is not alone in this exposition. Other postcolonial critics also grapple with this issue. A general overview of African countries immediately after independence would paint a gloomy picture of Africa. This feeling has been taken up by African writers of the generation immediately after independence. One word sums most of it: disillusionment. This disillusionment emanates from the following: Class inequalities persist irregardless of the fact that the ‘white’ oppressor has been defeated in war; The land has not been returned to the ‘black’ majority; The new governments have adopted the colonial systems of governance; Corruption has become rampant In short, the expectations of the majority have not been met. The questions of interest might be who/what is to blame for the slow development of African states. Is it enough to point at the ‘west’ or at the African leaders? What forces are at work? African literature has been unequivocal in its portrayal of the post-independent era. It would, however, be foolhardy to conclude that the literature paints one gloomy picture of the continent since different writers respond differently to the circumstances. Some adopt a pessimistic outlook, while for some there is still hope for Africa. For Ngugi wa Thiong’o (1987:1) “imperialism is still the root cause of many problems in Africa.” The working class comprising of workers and peasants is the most affected. Imperialism, through neo-colonialism, continues to dominate the political, economic and cultural lives of the Africans. Global capital manages the former colonies through multinational companies and financial power houses. Ngugi does not however believe the working class is docile in the face of imperialism. They remain defiant. Achebe (1983) sees it differently. He emphatically declares that the problem of postindependent Nigeria is the absence of committed leaders. The leaders are only interested in enriching themselves and remaining in power. Readings Rodney W. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa Fanon F. (1967) “Pitfalls of National Consciousness” in The Wretched of the Earth Freire P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed Achebe C. (1983) The Trouble with Nigeria * Reading lists at the end of each section are indicative and not exhaustive.