Reshaping Care Engagement Summary Report Eastwood House, Giffnock 2 August 2010 As part of the public engagement process, local partnerships were offered the opportunity of hosting a Local Engagement session to which Scottish Government officials would attend and record the discussion. A public meeting was held from 2pm to 4pm in East Renfrewshire on 2 August and was attended by 53 people. The session included representatives from the Community Health Partnership, Befriender Project, Carers Associations, Housing Associations, Retail Trust, Princess Royal Trust, RAHM Brighter Futures, and an MSP and members of the public. The panel were: June Findlater from East Renfrewshire Council, Tim Eltringham from the East Renfrewshire CHP and Mike Martin from the Scottish Government. The panel asked a series of questions based on five broad themes. Below is a summarised discussion from the meeting under the broad headings of the questions posed. Views from those attending: 1. Do you have confidence in the care system now? It is good that older people get to have their feet looked after, every three months as problems with feet are prevalent. But – is every three months enough? It should be more often as toenails grow quickly and can hinder walking. One lady applied to have her feet looked at with a view to having toenails cut, and upon applying was asked “can you reach your feet?” When she replied yes, she was told she should then be able to do it herself. Many people are very happy with their current level of care however with all the speculation around budget cuts what will the future hold? Will it be sustainable? Will there be means testing? One lady helped herself by installing a stairlift despite the fact she could barely afford it she knows it will help her to remain at home in the future. It can sometimes feel like a nanny state and people are dictated to rather than given choice. Retail Trust is a marvellous place. There are cottages, flats, a communal green, community hall – and there is help nearby if needed. This sort of housing set up is very good. 2. What changes would you like to see to care and support for older people in future? Knowing who and where to contact is a very important factor. Information should be more readily available. Each household is bombarded by junk mail yet we don’t seem to get the information that we really need. Even when you are in the social care system it is hard to get information. For instance when deciding on a care home it would be useful to know about the existence of Care Commission reports. Many older people will only put their trust in their own GP and look to them to provide the necessary help and information that they need. If they can send a letter saying you need a flu jab, they can send a letter saying all manner of things. This is an option for getting information out to older people. Alternatively, there should be a paid professional in each GP surgery whose sole role is to provide information to people, older and younger. There could also be someone who works for the council whose role is to visit older people and give them information about what options they have. Patient confidentiality can sometimes mean that the family do not find out how serious an older family member is until much further down the line. In some situations confidentiality should be waived. Bring back screening for over 75s rather than wait for acute problems to arise. An annual assessment for this age group would help to keep people healthy and potentially out of the system. We probably couldn’t afford to resource the screening of over 75s across Scotland and in any case younger age groups can very often be in need of just as much care. We cant however be seen to coerce people into the system and in fact this can be seen as elderly abuse. In every town and village across Scotland there are pensioners’ clubs. If social work staff went out to these clubs to tell people what help is available they would have a better understanding of the system. Unpaid carers need to be equal partners with professional staff when deciding on what is appropriate care. In many situations Power of Attorney does not give family members enough power and the difference between Power of Attorney and Guardianship is not made clear to people. Dementia should be recognised as an illness that is covered by the NHS. A deaf lady complained that there was no loop hearing system in a public meeting place. Should GPs be more intrusive when it comes to asking questions of older people, instead of being more careful. This may lead to picking up on any problems earlier leading to better health. Older People are often too proud to ask for help, they do not realise it is their right to receive it. They need to be of the mindset that asking for help from social services does not make them a failure. To provide a service, must communicate with the user and find out exactly what they want – should not just assume they know what is best. There is too much red tape, too much bureaucracy in getting people into care. There needs to be less - let the people who want to help, help, don’t make them jump through hoops. The benefits system needs to be looked at - why should people who have saved all their lives pay for care when others that have spent everything they have and get everything for free. 3. 4. 5. Who should be responsible for the costs of care? A lot of older people with a small pension would struggle to pay for care. One audience member stated they paid for most things out of their own pocket, but when they needed, and asked for, a specialised toilet, it was provided, but followed by a bill for £900. Why do services keep bleeding older people dry? Is consideration being given to what happens regarding the cost of care in other European countries? Many other countries ask individuals to contribute more and as a result have a better care system. When Richard Branson set up the National Lottery he said we should put the money into the NHS – can we not do that now? At present there is a huge waste of Government resources and there needs to be honesty about where the money is being spent. Unused and unnecessary pharmaceuticals are costing the NHS millions which could be invested into other services. This needs addressed urgently. GPs issue far too many repeat prescriptions to people who may not need to take medication any longer. Who should be responsible for care and support? The voluntary sector should not be responsible for care. Instead, if unpaid carers are to be primary carers, then the state needs to be there to provide back-up, to support them. Many people over 60 are already providing unpaid care to their spouse or other family member however this is taking its toll on their own health. Direct payments are seen to be too bureaucratic and add to the burden. There can also be a long wait before finances become available. Someone said that their father had money all his life but didn’t spend it. If he received direct payments he wouldn’t have used that to pay for care either. It doesn’t matter who provides the care, what is important is that the older person is given choice and all the information they might need to make an informed decision on where their care should be. This choice should include options on the NHS and private options. Volunteering is not the answer, but it certainly does help, whether it be befriending on a 1 to 1 basis or in a group setting. What type of care do you prefer? Would prefer to stay at home, but the key point here is personalisation. Currently happy in own home with adaptations doing their bit to suit changing needs. Care homes cannot necessarily promise such personally defined care. The older population are very proud and asking for help can sometimes not be easy for them. There is also the fear that they could be put in a care home if they ask for help as it is sometimes the easy option.