Cause-Effect Critical Reading Guide (hand this in with your revised essay) OK to share with class You can share, but don’t use my name Please don’t share Writer: ________________________________________________________________ Purpose: What do you hope to accomplish in this paper? Problem: Ask your reader to help you solve the single most important problem with your draft. Describe this problem briefly. Reader ________________________________________________________________ Contact info: ___________________________________________________________ General Reaction/Advice: Cause-Effect Essay Criteria Unity Comments Yes No Thesis clearly expresses cause-effect relationship Content supports thesis Yes No At least three supporting points are present Transitions and signal words such as because make relationship of ideas clear Logical fallacies are avoided: — coincidence is not confused with cause — focus is on important causes — evidence is provided for all causes Yes No Introduction, conclusion, and title are effective Organization is clear: Cause-to-effect(s), Effect-to-cause(s), or Series of causes Transitions and other connecting words lead reader through paper Verb tenses are appropriate, without confusing shifts Yes No Support/Development Coherence Sentence Skills Spelling, grammar, and sentence structure are correct COMPOSITION II GRADING RUBRIC: CAUSE-EFFECT Name___________________________ Evaluative Area Unity (25 points total) Appropriate organizing strategies include • cause-to-effect • effect-to-cause • chain of causes 4 Section___________________ Date ______________ 3 2 1/0 Thesis clearly states cause/effect relationship Thesis states cause/effect relationship Thesis lacks clear direction No thesis (557) Solid topic sentences and supporting paragraphs Topic sent. and/or para. content need more relation to thesis Topic sentences present, but paragraphs need to be expanded Lacks topic sentences and appropriate paragraphing (559) Conclusion: Restated thesis relates directly to thesis and uses varied language Conclusion: Restated thesis provided, but too much like thesis OR needs work Conclusion: Summation provided, but does not relate closely enough to thesis 3 points of support but relate loosely 1 or 2 points of support Lacks quality support Some evidence for each point is provided Evidence is provided for only 1 or 2 points Lacks specific evidence Documentation present, but format is incorrect Organization plan is clear Some documentation missing Work needed to maintain organization No documentation present Transitions present, but work is needed to clarify how ideas are related Some transitions missing between and within paragraphs Lacks transitions and connections throughout (567) Introduction, conclusion, and title present; lack a relationship Title is lacking, introduction and conclusion relate well Title, introduction, and/or conclusion missing Conclusion: Lacks restated thesis Thesis and conclusion engage attention and give reader a reason to care Support 3 or more specific points of support (25 points total) Specific evidence for each point is presented Coherence (25 points total) Material is correctly cited and smoothly integrated Method of organization is clear and wellsuited to topic and audience Transitions and connections between and within paragraphs flow easily Effective introduction, conclusion, title Lacks any method of organization Sentence Skills (25 points total) Sentences are correct and varied in length and structure. Language is precise and original. Language is appropriate to the intended audience. Paper is free from fragments Few fragments exist (H 10) Understanding lost due to fragments Paper is free from run-ons Work needed to fix run-ons (H8) Understanding lost due to R-O-S Subjects and verbs agree throughout Some S-Vs lack agreement (H25) Understanding lost due to S-V agree. All verb tenses are correct Some verb tenses need work (H21) Understanding lost due to verb tense Parallelism is used throughout Parallelism lacking at times (H45) Understanding lost due to faulty parallelism Pronouns agree; correct reference Pronouns lack agreement; reference (H14) Only 3rd person PNs used Shifts in PN point of view (H-19) Capital letters are correct Capital letters need correction (H88) Punctuation is correct Punctuation needs work (H58-85) Varied sentence structure is evident Few sentence variations (H116) No spelling errors or careless errors Few spelling/ careless errors Sentences are clear and carefully worded Few awkwardly worded sentences Succinct wording throughout Effective and appropriate language Correct format: name, section, type of paper, date, draft, layout Sometimes lacks succinctness (H48) Few instances of ineffective or immature lang. (H52-55) All information present; lacks correct format Understanding lost due to PN agreement/ ref. Understanding lost due to shifts in PN P-O-V Understanding lost due to capitalization problems Understanding lost due to punctuation errors Lacks sentence variety Understanding lost due to spelling/ careless errors Understanding lost due to awk. sent. Understanding lost due to repetition Lacks effectiveness and maturity Lacks correct format and information