B. The Church during the Two World Wars The struggle between the Secular Nationalism and the Church was soon overwhelmed by the advent of World War I & II. These wars were unprecedented in history in terms of participants, weaponry, cost, and lives. The Church had to react to this global disaster at a time when many thought its influence was on a steep decline. 1) Benedict XV (1914-1922) and World War I o St. Pius X died on the eve of the outbreak of WWI on August 20, 1914; some say he died of grief over what was to happen. o His place was taken by one of the cardinals created by Pius X: Giacomo della Chiesa, who took the name of Benedict XV. o Immediately, the Church had to rely on his skills as a diplomat to guide it through these difficult times. o Unfortunately, Benedict was facing a near obsessive mentality in all the world’s leaders because of Secular Nationalism. a) Secular Nationalism and World War I. Secular Nationalism demanded that everyone put the interests of the nation first over everything else, as Bismarck did in Prussia. This implied that anything conflicting with the interests of the nation had to be opposed, especially if this opposition came from another nation. This led to the network of alliances that turned Europe and its colonies into an armed camp with Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire in alliance against Britain, France, and Russia. In diplomacy, Germany, Britain and France made it their ultimate goal to outmaneuver each other. When the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand made diplomacy impossible, this obsession to outdo their rivals translated into defeating them completely in war. So, once the War started, Secular Nationalism made the complete and utter defeat of the enemy the epitome of patriotism; unless this was achieved, no talk of truce would be considered. b) "Victorious Peace" vs. "Peace without Victory" WWI began in 1914; most thought it would end by the next year at the most, as most wars did. By 1916, with the attrition caused by trenches and machine guns, it was clear that this war would be much longer, but because of Secular Nationalism, neither side wanted to discuss peace. What the world leaders wanted was a "Victorious Peace" in which one side was totally vanquished. Benedict made several appeals to world leaders for a "Peace without Victory", which called for an immediate end to the War without consideration of who won or lost and how. The following are excerpts of his exhortations. - "The rulers of the peoples should be satisfied with the ruin already wrought." - "Who could realize that they are brethren, children of the same Father in Heaven?" - While pressured by both sides to condemn the other, Benedict instead condemned the war itself as an "unparalleled scourge," a "carnage which is without example," a "horrible plague," and "that monstrous spectacle." - As early as Christmas 1914, Benedict said the following in his homily: "May the fratricidal weapons fall to the ground! Already they are too bloodstained; let them at last fall! And may the hands of those how have to wield them return to the labours of industry and commerce, to the works of civilization and peace." - In Holy Week of 1915: "In this hour made terrible with burning hate, with bloodshed and with slaughter, once more may Thy divine Heart be moved to pity…Inspire rulers and peoples with counsels of meekness…heal the discords that tear nations asunder…hear our trustful prayer, and give back to the world peace and tranquility." - To 5000 children who received First Communion at the Vatican in July 1916: "[You know], my children, how for two long years men who were once innocent and affectionate like you, and are so no longer, have been tearing and killing each other…We desire that mankind may cease from hatred and slaughter…May God…spare you and your household and the entire world every further shedding of blood by the merits of [the Precious Blood of Christ]…" - In August 1917, Benedict recommended a Peace Plan on the basis of 7 principles: 1. The "moral force of right" instead of the "material force of arms." 1 2. Limitation of armaments. 3. Compulsory arbitration of international disputes. 4. Full freedom of the seas. 5. Renunciation of all claims to war reparations. 6. Evacuation and restoration of all territories conquered during the war. 7. Review of any border territorial disputes like Alsace-Lorraine in a "conciliatory spirit." His appeals my have resonated with ordinary Catholics, but it didn’t do much with world leaders. Only the new Emperor of Austria-Hungary, Charles I of Hapsburg, was willing to seek a "Peace without Victory." He too was ignored and died in exile in 1922, but he was beatified for his efforts by Pope John Paul II in 2004. Other world leaders were less than polite: - A young Benito Mussolini, in the initial stages of dominating Italian politics, publicly condemned Benedict’s Holy Week prayer. - The French Police called the Holy Week prayer "subversive". - British Foreign Minister Arthur Balfour refused to consider Benedict’s 7-Point Peace Plan because it didn’t make Germany admit war guilt. - French Foreign Minister Alexandre Ribot and Italian Foreign Minister Sidney Sonnino objected to having any written correspondence with the Pope on matters of war and peace. - Any hope of this plan accepted in Germany was destroyed by General Erich Ludendorff. - U.S. President Woodrow Wilson’s first reaction to Benedict’s Peace Plan was the following quote: "What does he want to butt in for?" c) After the War When the war ended, and the victors were negotiating the Treaty Versailles, Benedict tried to warn the Allied Powers not to humiliate Germany: "Remember that nations do not die; humbled and oppressed, they chafe under the yoke imposed upon them, preparing a renewal of the combat, and passing down from generation to generation a mournful heritage of revenge." Of course, the world leaders ignored him, and the Treaty of Versailles imposed harsh conditions on Germany which included accepting guilt for the war and a paying all reparations. Many historians agree that these harsh terms were a direct cause of the rise of the Nazis and the start of World War II. Benedict, in the meantime, gave huge sums of Vatican money for the relief of thousands of war refugees. By the time Benedict died on Jan. 22, 1922, the Vatican treasury couldn’t afford the expenses to pay for the next conclave; eventually, the conclave was able to elect Cardinal Achille Ratti a few weeks later. It was up to Cardinal Ratti—who took the name Pius XI—to deal with the crises left by World War I. 2) Pius XI (1922-1939) and the world between wars a) The Lateran Treaty of 1929 The Popes were still the "Prisoners of the Vatican" from the times of Bd. Pius IX. By 1919, Mussolini and his Fascists were gradually taking control of Italy by some harsh measures, but he still could not afford the condemnation of the Church; consequently, he opened negotiations with the Vatican. The result of these negotiations was the Lateran Treaty signed in 1929. - The Italian government recognized the Vatican State as an independent nation, it gave legal standing to religious orders and other Catholic institutions in Italy, and Catholicism could be taught in Italian schools. - The Vatican would give up territorial claims in Italy, recognize the ruling royal dynasty as legitimate, and stay out of Italian politics b) Pius XI vs. unrestrained capitalism In the West, the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century had evolved to the unbridled Capitalism of the 20th century. Companies and corporations made profit the ultimate goal of business, and a dog-eat-dog mentality ensued. This was merged with Darwin’s idea of "survival of the fittest" in which the strong companies survived and the weak ones were eliminated. 2 Low wages, bankruptcy, unemployment, and dangerous working conditions were often seen as merely "the cost of doing business." In response, Pius XI wrote the encyclical Quadragesimo Anno, where he reiterated the Church’s insistence of social justice in the realm of economics: - "Every effort must therefore be made that fathers of families receive a wage large enough to meet ordinary family needs adequately. But if this cannot always be done under existing circumstances, social justice demands that changes be introduced as soon as possible whereby such a wage will be assured to every adult workingman." - "The riches that economic-social developments constantly increase ought to be so distributed among individual persons and classes that ... the common good of all society will be kept inviolate." - It follows from the twofold character of ownership, which we have termed individual and social, that men must take into account in this matter not only their own advantage but also the common good." c) Pius XI vs. Atheistic Communism Karl Marx's ideas of a proletariat revolution were established in Russia during the Russian Revolution of 1917. Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown and eventually executed, while Lenin proclaimed a "Workers' State" with the Communist Party in control. Because Marx believed that religion was "the opiate of the people" and a means for the rich to control the proletariat, the Communists under Lenin and later Josef Stalin aimed to supress it by confiscating church lands and limiting religious freedom. Under Stalin, Communist Russia became a totalitarian state ( = a single party led by a dictator controls all aspects of life), which is the ultimate form of Secular Nationalism; outright persecution was just a matter of time. In response, Pius XI wrote the encyclical Divini Redemptoris in which he condemned the errors of Communism. -"Communism is by its nature anti-religious. It considers religion as "the opiate of the people" because the principles of religion which speak of a life beyond the grave dissuade the proletariat from the dream of a Soviet paradise which is of this world." - "After all, even the sphere of economics needs some morality, some moral sense of responsibility, which can find no place in a system so thoroughly materialistic as Communism. Terrorism is the only possible substitute, and it is terrorism that reigns today in Russia, where former comrades in revolution are exterminating each other. Terrorism, having failed despite all to stem the tide of moral corruption, cannot even prevent the dissolution of society itself." d) Pius XI vs. the Fascists Pius also had to deal with the other form of totalitarianism--Fascism He already dealt with Italian fascists under Mussolini; this resulted in the Lateran Treaty. In Spain during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939), Pius XI faced a dilemma with Generalissimo Francisco Franco, whose group included Nationalists and Fascists who were backed by Hitler and Mussolini. Franco was a Fascist and totalitarian, but: - Franco claimed to be a practicing Catholic who was defending the Spanish Church, and he openly guaranteed that Catholicism would be recognized and protected under his government. - Pius was still worried about the spread of Communism, and the Communists had joined the Civil War on the side of the Republicans against Franco's coalition. - Spain's Republican government turned a blind eye to the Spanish Communists' anti-Catholic activities in which they burned churches and killed religious; in 1936 alone 10 bishops, 6000 priests, and 16 000 religious and lay leaders were killed by the Spanish Communists. - What does Pius XI do? Does he support Franco as a defender of Catholics or condemn him as a fascist dictator? The biggest challenge was Germany where Adolf Hitler and the Nazis established another totalitarian state. - Hitler’s policies were aggressive and brutal against minorities like Jews and Slavs. - Hitler, the ultimate Secular Nationalist, also took measures to suppress the Church. 3 Pius XI responded by publishing an Encyclical specifically to the Church in Germany: Mit Brennender Sorge (“With Great Anxiety”), which condemned the Nazis’ racist actions in Germany and was ordered to be read at Sunday Mass everywhere in Germany. Hitler angrily reacted by suppressing the Church even more: - He threw priests and laypeople in prison. - He closed the presses that printed Mit Brennender Sorge. - He forced Catholic schools and clergy to teach the Nazi party line but forbade them to participate in political activities. - In all of this, he threatened the Pope not to criticize the Nazis further or risk even more reprisals. This gave Pius XI a dilemma: - As pope, he was obliged to criticize what Hitler was doing not only to the Church, but to the others being persecuted (Jews, Slavs, Gypsies, etc.). - At the same time, Pius knew that criticism not only would cause more suffering to the Church in Germany, but Hitler could easily convince his ally Mussolini to break the Lateran Treaty and invade the Vatican itself. Pius XI would die on February 10, 1939; World War II would break out less than 7 months later which only added to the dilemma. This dilemma would be placed in the hands of the Cardinal who had experience as Secretary of State and Papal Nuncio to Germany since World War I—Eugenio Pacelli. Assignment 1. What form of Secular Nationalism did Benedict XV face, and how did he meet that challenge? How successful was he? 2. How did Pius XI’s writings promote social and economic justice against the errors of capitalism and communism? 3. Totalitarianism was another form of Secular Nationalism. How did Pius XI meet the challenges of the two kinds of totalitarianism? 4. [Opinion question] Based what you learned about Benedict XV here and in Unit 4 about St. Benedict of Nursia (who wrote the Rule of St. Benedict), is there any significance in the fact that Cardinal Josef Ratzinger chose the name Benedict XVI when he was elected in 2005? [Bonus +2] 4