1 EXCEPTIONAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT AND ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES HENRICO COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Department of Exceptional Education and Support Services Revised June 2012 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 BEFORE THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING ......................................................................................2 AT THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING ................................................................................................3 AFTER THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING.........................................................................................5 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ELIGIBILITY ..............................................................6 OPERATIONAL CRITERIA WORKSHEETS Autism ................................................................................................................................18 Deaf-Blindness ...................................................................................................................22 Developmental Delay.........................................................................................................24 Emotional Disability ..........................................................................................................25 Hearing Impairment ...........................................................................................................27 Intellectual Disability .........................................................................................................28 Multiple Disabilities...........................................................................................................29 Orthopedic Impairment ......................................................................................................30 Other Health Impairment ...................................................................................................31 Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ..........................................................................32 Specific Learning Disability ..............................................................................................33 Speech or Language Impairment .......................................................................................35 Traumatic Brain Injury ......................................................................................................36 Visual Impairment .............................................................................................................37 QUALITY MEETING GUIDELINES ..........................................................................................38 APPENDIX A. Federal Definitions 3 INTRODUCTION A student may receive special education services when a multidisciplinary team determines that the student: 1) is considered to have a disability under federal and state laws and regulations governing special education, and 2) due to that disability, requires specially designed instruction to meet his/her unique needs. In Henrico County Public Schools, this decision is made at the school level by an Eligibility Group. Under federal laws and regulations, the child’s parent participates as a group member during the eligibility process. School personnel will work closely with the parent to explain the decision-making process. It is our goal to help parents feel comfortable with the procedure and become active participants in the meeting. In addition to the parents, the Eligibility Group consists of qualified professionals. Contributing members of the Eligibility Group are: administrator/designee, school psychologist, school social worker, general education and special education teachers, the parent(s), and other school personnel contributing components to the eligibility consideration. If a child meets the criteria for Speech/Language Impaired as the primary disability, the Eligibility Group is composed of the administrator/designee, speech/language pathologist, the student’s teacher, and the parent. Other staff members may be present to contribute to the consensus determination. This booklet is designed to assist Eligibility Group members in making clear and consistent decisions. It is recommended that administrators/designees review this booklet to ensure that the correct procedures are followed. 4 BEFORE THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING A. SCHEDULE THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING Most schools hold eligibility meetings on a specific day of the week according to the schedules of the psychologist and social worker assigned to the building. With this in mind, contact the parent to identify a mutually convenient date and time. Inform them that copies of the reports to be presented at the meeting will be available for review two days prior to the meeting. Collaborate with school staff about possible meeting dates. Confirm the date by mailing notice of the eligibility meeting to the parent. B. NOTIFY SCHOOL-BASED STAFF Notify school staff. C. COLLECT REPORTS FOR REVIEW Reports to be presented must be typed and placed in the student education record no later than two business days prior to the eligibility meeting so the parents may have access to the reports. Each professional conducting an assessment or completing a report is responsible for submitting the report in a timely manner. 5 AT THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING A. SETTING THE STAGE The eligibility chair will welcome the participants and introduce group members, stating their roles and their relationships to the student. The eligibility chair will state the purpose of the meeting and provide a brief description of the proceedings. The eligibility chair will present a summary of the background information and the reason for the evaluation. B. PRESENTATION OF REPORTS Each evaluation team member will present a summary of his/her report to the group. Highlights of the summary will be recorded on the Eligibility Group Summary of Deliberations. A written copy of the evaluation reports must be provided to the parent(s). C. PARENTS PROVIDE INFORMATION After reports are presented, the eligibility chair will ask the parent(s) if there are any questions or any additional information they would like the group to consider. D. DECISION-MAKING PROCESS The eligibility chair will review the decision-making process used in Henrico County Public Schools. Group members are asked which disabilities they would like the group to consider. The Operational Criteria Worksheets are selected from the file/notebook. E. OPERATIONAL CRITERIA WORKSHEETS ADDRESSED Each Operational Criteria Worksheet is considered separately. The eligibility chair reads the definition of the disability. The eligibility chair ensures that the required reports have been obtained. The eligibility chair reads each criteria aloud. The group discusses each item and comes to a consensus. It is not necessary for the group to come to complete agreement on each item. Dissenting opinions are noted on the Eligibility Group Summary of Deliberations with an explanation. (See F. and G.) F. CHILD DETERMINED ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION Based on the information in the Operational Criteria Worksheets, the Eligibility Group identifies the presence of a disability that requires special education. If there is disagreement among group members, each member’s opinion is taken and an effort is made to reach consensus. Using language contained in the Operational Criteria Worksheets, a written summary that consists of the basis for the group’s eligibility decision is composed. Members of the Eligibility Group sign the Eligibility Minutes form indicating that they agree or disagree with the decision. If any member disagrees with the consensus of the group, he/she must write a statement of explanation presenting that member’s conclusions. A child may be determined to have more than one disability, based on Operational Criteria Worksheets. G. CHILD DETERMINED INELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION Based on the information in the Operational Criteria Worksheets, the group may find a child ineligible for special education. If there is disagreement among group members, each member’s opinion is taken and an effort is made to reach consensus. If a child is found 6 ineligible, the group is required to make recommendations for further programming. One of the recommendations may be a referral to the child study or intervention teams; additional recommendations will be case and child specific. Implement Response to Intervention process to continue assessing the effectiveness of interventions in general education. The Essential Deliberations statement is composed. Members of the Eligibility Group sign the form indicating their agreement or disagreement with the decision. If a member disagrees with the consensus of the group, he/she must write a statement of dissent. This statement may be written on the dissent page. H. DISAGREEMENT OF PARENT If the parent expresses disagreement with the group’s decision, the eligibility chair indicates the section entitled “Impartial Due Process Hearing” in the procedural safeguards document. The eligibility chair describes the mediation and due process activities and informs the parent how to access each one. The notice of the proposed action is provided to the parents with a copy of their procedural safeguards. If mediation is selected by parents, they may access more information on this subject through the Virginia Department of Education website. (http//www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/dueproc/) If mediation or a due process hearing is requested by the parents, the Director of Exceptional Education should receive a letter from the parents. It is critical at this time to be sure that the eligibility group informs parents that support for their child will be implemented in academic and/or behavioral areas, no matter what the decision of the eligibility group is. I. DISTRIBUTION OF PAPERWORK The parent receives the signed copy of the Eligibility Minutes, the Procedural Safeguards document, and the Prior Written Notice. The Prior Written Notice may be completed after the meeting in more complex cases and when parents and school are not in agreement. Parents should receive the Prior Written Notice as soon as possible. If applicable, the parent also receives a copy of the LD Addendum and a copy of the Conclusions of Dissenting Members. The eligibility chair ensures that the parent has no additional questions or concerns. 7 AFTER THE ELIGIBILITY MEETING A. IF PARENT DID NOT ATTEND MEETING Mail a copy of the above-described paperwork to the student’s home. Call them to inform them of the group’s decision and respond to any questions they might have. Let them know that you will be sending documents in the mail. This is also a good time to schedule the IEP meeting if the child has been found eligible or the child study/ intervention team meeting if the student is ineligible for special education. B. STUDENT FOUND INELIGIBLE If the student has been found ineligible for special education, review the Essential Deliberations and check the recommendations made by the Eligibility Group. Take action as necessary. Students who are found ineligible for special education may be referred to the child study/intervention team to develop an appropriate child study plan. C. STUDENT FOUND ELIGIBLE If the student was found eligible for special education services, schedule the IEP meeting to occur within thirty (30) calendar days of the eligibility meeting. Review the Essential Deliberations statement for IEP recommendations and related services to be considered. Ensure the presence of the appropriate related service provider(s) at the meeting. 8 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT ELIGIBILITY RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION What role does RtI play in eligibility decisions? The expectation is that eligibility groups will help determine if specialized instruction is needed by applying the response to intervention process. This includes goal setting, progress monitoring, and use of research-based interventions. What is the timeline for continuing to use an intervention before determining that a special education evaluation is needed? Is there a maximum time that a student can be involved in a RtI process? Decisions about the duration, type(s), and number of interventions must be based on an individual student’s performance data; therefore, there is no prescribed length of time for intervention implementation. Sufficient time must be provided to a) determine if the intervention is working and b) “close the gap” between the performance of the target student and peers or benchmark expectations when effective interventions have been documented. The greater the gap, the more time will be needed to bring the target student into the range of expected performance. The team must consider each individual student’s needs and use data from frequent progress monitoring and other sources to determine the length of time to implement interventions and plan revisions to interventions accordingly. School teams should use standardized databased decision rules rather than prescribed timelines to evaluate student outcomes. Other factors to consider include: • The student’s baseline performance level, • The student’s prior history of effective interventions, • The stability of the student in the current school and instructional environment (e.g., student attendance/absences, disciplinary removals from class, student mobility), and • The intensity of the interventions. Can parents request an evaluation while their child is involved in an RtI process? The right for parents to request a special education evaluation at any time has not changed, nor have the requirements associated with the district’s response to such a request. Therefore, parents can request a special education evaluation at any time prior to, during, or following their child’s involvement in an RtI process. If the district agrees that the student may be a student with a disability requiring special education and related services, then it must provide notice of the intent to conduct an evaluation, obtain written parental consent, and complete the evaluation. If the district does not agree that a special education evaluation is warranted, a written notice must be provided to the parents that informs them of this decision and explains the reasons why it has been determined an evaluation is not indicated. The parent can challenge the district’s decision by requesting mediation and/or a due process hearing to resolve the dispute over the student’s need for an evaluation. To determine special education eligibility, existing data collected during the RtI process will be used as an important source of evaluation information. The school eligibility team, which includes a student’s parents, will determine if these data are sufficient to 9 determine eligibility or if additional evaluation data are needed. During this process, any interventions the student has been receiving should continue to be provided. How do you decide what’s good evidence-based instruction? Start with the documentation provided by school staff of the instruction, interventions and data on the student’s progress to date. Ask for information on how the various approaches and strategies were selected, and their relationship to district guidance and scientifically-based practice. GENERAL QUESTIONS: What does “adversely affects educational performance” mean? An adverse effect on educational performance can incorporate all aspects of the child’s functioning at school, including educational performance as measured by grades or achievement test scores. It can also be manifested through behavioral difficulties at school; and impaired or inappropriate social relations; impaired work skills, such as being disorganized, tardy, having trouble getting to work on time and difficulty with following the rules. Schools are required to address the effects of a child’s disability in all areas of functioning, including academic, social/emotional, cognitive, communication, vocational, and independent living skills. What part do private evaluations play in eligibility consideration? Henrico County Public Schools has the right to complete the evaluation of the child and the responsibility to review private evaluations. Private evaluations should be viewed as supplemental to components completed by school personnel. In interpreting evaluation data for the purpose of determining if a child has a disability and determining the educational needs of the child, the Eligibility Group shall: (a) draw upon information from a variety of sources, including aptitude and achievement tests, parent input, teacher recommendations, physical condition, social or cultural background, and adaptive behavior; and (b) ensure that information from all these sources is documented and carefully considered. When the Eligibility Group determines that information is not sufficient to make an eligibility decision, what do they do? The group must either not find the student eligible (initial eligibility) or maintain current eligibility. A re-evaluation may then be initiated and eligibility determined based on new evaluative reports. If a selected component is determined to not be essential to the eligibility decision, complete the eligibility meeting based on available information. Can we find a student eligible based on oral information given during the meeting when this information is not included in written form? All available information, written and oral, should be used in making eligibility decisions. Written documentation should always be present. For example, a student with a health impairment (other than ADHD) must have the health impairment documented by a physician. This documentation is necessary, even when the parent may have given verbal information pertaining to the health impairment in the social history or shared medical information during the eligibility meeting. 10 What is meant by “current” evaluation? An evaluation may be considered current if it was completed within the 12 months (6 months for preschool) prior to the eligibility meeting. Any current report deemed relevant can be used when making an eligibility decision with the exception of a hearing test, which must be administered within the 65-day time frame allowed for the eligibility process. What assessment components should be used for re-evaluation? Minimally, the educational component (to include standardized achievement testing) should be updated. Questions or concerns about student progress may justify the need for additional evaluative components. The group should refer to the Student Planning Worksheet and previous evaluations. Can a report be updated? Yes. The decision to update rather than readminister an assessment component is an individual professional decision. When the professional updates a report, he/she is accepting that report as a current reflection of the student’s performance/ability. If the decision is made to update, NEW information must be added (for example, the psychologist who decides not to readminister a cognitive abilities test but who does conduct an interview or a classroom observation). Does the Eligibility Group decide if a student is eligible to receive related services? With the exception of speech/language, vision, and hearing services, the IEP Team determines whether or not a related service is required in a student’s IEP based upon review of the goals and objectives, appropriate assessment reports, and local guidelines for provision of related services. However, the Eligibility Group may review the related service evaluation, document the results on the Eligibility Minutes Summary form, and recommend that the service be considered by the IEP Team. What do I tell parents about mediation and due process? Both mediation and due process are avenues parents may pursue if they are in disagreement with any decision regarding evaluation, identification, or placement of their child in special education. Due process may be initiated by the parent contacting the Executive Director of Exceptional Education or the Virginia Department of Education. Mediation may be initiated by the parent writing a letter to the Executive Director of Exceptional Education that states the reason for disagreement. An explanation of mediation and due process is in the procedural safeguards document, which will be given to the parent at any meeting involving special education. Copies of forms for requesting mediation or due process are available from the VDOE’s Office of Dispute Resolution and Administration website: http://www.pen.k12.va.us/VDOE/dueproc/. What assessment components should be used for re-evaluation? The educational evaluation (to include standardized achievement testing) and the observation should be minimally completed. Questions or concerns about student 11 progress may justify the need for additional evaluative components. The group should refer to the Student Planning Worksheet and previous evaluations. When an evaluation is initiated at a child study meeting and the team suspects a child has fine motor issues, can an occupational therapy (OT) assessment be selected as an evaluative component? No. OT is a related service to the IEP, and an OT assessment can only be initiated at an IEP meeting. However, an occupational therapist may be invited to a child study meeting, and may offer suggestions for teacher and parent to address fine motor concerns. The OT may also observe the student in the classroom and offer additional recommendations for home and school assistance. If an IEP team determines that a student has made progress on an IEP, no further IEP goals are needed, and the student no longer requires special education services, how should the student be terminated from special education services? A full evaluation is needed, an eligibility meeting is held, and if the consensus is that the student is no longer eligible, with parental written consent, the student is then exited from special education. What should the IEP team do if a parent wants their child out of special education immediately and will not consent to any re-evaluations? Parents have the right to refuse special education services. The parent should notify HCPS in writing that they want their child removed from special education and refuse special education services. This means ALL services, if a parent disagrees with level of services or specific services only then the team should utilize the standard dispute resolution. If a parent removes their child from special education services HCPS retains the right to disagree and file a due process if we believe special education is necessary for FAPE. AUTISM: Do you have to have a medical diagnosis of autism? No. We consider autism an educational label, not a medical diagnosis. A medical diagnosis of autism or a Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD), however, may provide supportive data in making an eligibility decision. If there is no medical documentation of autism, there must be sufficient documentation in the reports to support the determination. This will include observations, reports from school personnel, and behavioral checklists. Under the autism criteria for Step 4, “documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance,” does this include those students who only have significant social skill deficits? Yes. DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY: When a child is approaching his or her seventh birthday, does he/she need to go back to eligibility even if it has not been three years since the last evaluation? 12 Yes. All children who have been identified as Developmentally Delayed must be reevaluated and go through the eligibility process to determine a categorical disability and the need for continued special education. Can you give a categorical designation to a child before the age of seven? Absolutely! A categorical designation is required if the child clearly meets the criteria. EMOTIONAL DISABILITY: When an emotional disability is suspected, besides evaluative components, what else should be done? Best practice recommends that in most cases a functional behavior assessment and behavior plan be implemented prior to eligibility meeting. Can a student be socially maladjusted and still have an emotional disability? Yes. A student with an emotional disability may present with significant problems in behavior. A severely depressed student, for example, may well act out in ways that violate norms of behavior in school – smoking, fighting, abusing substances, verbally abusing others, etc. However, the student may not be found eligible solely on the basis of social maladjustment. In order to be eligible under Emotional Disability (or any disability category), the student must meet the applicable criteria. Can a student be drug involved and be identified as emotionally disabled? Yes. However, substance abuse, by itself, is not an emotional disability. The Eligibility Group must investigate if the characteristics of emotional disability were present before the onset of the substance abuse. If a student was hospitalized for psychiatric reasons, does he/she automatically qualify for ED services? No. Students may be hospitalized for psychiatric reasons, which may or may not qualify them for ED services. Severe behavior problems often precipitate psychiatric hospitalizations for students who would not qualify for ED services. Moreover, a psychiatric diagnosis does not necessarily qualify a student for ED services. The Eligibility Group must carefully examine the data presented in order to determine if the diagnosis creates an adverse educational impact. Can a very young child be identified as a child with emotional disability? Yes. The data must clearly support the determination that the child has an emotional disability; however, such an identification will be a rare occurrence. HEARING IMPAIRMENT: Do we need to have a current audiological assessment to determine eligibility for hearing impairment? A current audiological assessment for an initial evaluation should occur within 65 days. Can a student be both hearing impaired and learning disabled? 13 Yes, but it is a rare occurrence. The data must clearly show that the specific learning disability is not caused by the hearing impairment and the Essential Deliberations statement must provide strong evidence that the hearing impairment is not exclusionary for a learning disability. INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY: What are areas of adaptive behavior? Adaptive behavior skills are those that help us to function in nonacademic activities. Areas of adaptive behavior will vary according to the instrument used for measurement. They may include self-care, communication, daily living skills, social skills, selfdirection, health, safety, and leisure. Do we need formal measures of adaptive behavior or can we use descriptions of behavior found in a social history or teacher narrative? At least one formal measure must be reported. It is also useful to gather evidence for deficits in adaptive behavior from one or more reliable independent sources (i.e., teacher education reports; educational, developmental, and medical evaluations). Can a student be found eligible as intellectually disabled (ID) with standard scores in academics above the ID range? Students can be found eligible as ID with some achievement scores above the ID range. (ID range is two or more standard deviations below the mean, i.e., a standard score of 70 or less.) High splinter skills should not negate the preponderance of evidence supporting the ID identification. Can a student be found eligible as intellectually disabled with standard scores in adaptive behavior above the ID range? It is expected that students being considered for ID have composite scores two or more standard deviations below the mean (i.e., a standard score of 70 or less). However, all available information should be considered in making a determination of ID. Do ID students with standard scores of 40 or less who also have physical impairments, emotional issues, etc., need to be given additional eligibility identifications? No. Typically, these students require no additional identifications. What happened to the Severe Disability category? The Severe Disability category no longer exists separately. Students with standard scores of 40 or less are now identified as having an intellectual disability. MULTIPLE DISABILITIES: What is meant by “multiple disabilities”? A student with multiple disabilities will meet the criteria for at least two disability categories. The educational impact of these concomitant impairments will be so severe that they cannot be accommodated in a special education program solely for one of the impairments. In the rare cases when a student is found eligible for multiple 14 disabilities without ID, the Eligibility Group must provide a clear statement for this position. ORTHOPEDIC IMPAIRMENT: Does an OI student automatically receive occupational and physical therapy? No. OI students qualify for OT and PT in the same way as any other student receiving special education services. The students must go through the referral and evaluation process, and it is the responsibility of the IEP team to consider whether these services are required to support the special education program. Can a student have cerebral palsy and not be found eligible for services? Yes. As a student with OI, there has to be educational impact. There are students with CP who do not require special education services. Does a student with OI have to exhibit a severe discrepancy between ability and achievement to determine educational impact? No. The impact of physical disability may not be reflected on standardized testing. In some cases, the student will be impacted in the area of fine-motor skills, production of class work, or in organizational skills. The Eligibility Group needs to refer to all data, particularly the teacher education reports, to obtain data relevant to the educational impact. OTHER HEALTH IMPAIRMENT: Are students with ADHD automatically considered eligible under OHI? No. ADHD may be considered under OHI. The student must first meet the Henrico County criteria as a student with ADHD. Then, the nature of the attentional deficit and its impact on educational performance must be considered. Eligibility Groups must review the modifications/accommodations to the general education environment that have been made. If ADHD is suspected, besides evaluative components, what else is needed for the eligibility meeting? Goals from the child study team addressing issues at school related to ADHD should be developed with interventions, progress monitoring, and data to show effects of plan. For example, what is the intervention plan for poor sustained attention? Are children with a neurological impairment automatically considered eligible under OHI? No. It depends on the nature of the impairment and its educational impact. SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY: May teams determine when to use the ability/achievement discrepancy as part of SLD criteria? No. HCPS is no longer using ability/achievement discrepancy as part of the SLD criteria. 15 If a student initially identified as having a SLD that interferes with reading, then later presents concerns in math, do we need to initiate a formal re-evaluation or could the IEP committee add math goals to the plan? This student should be referred to the child study team to write an intervention plan to address math. The response to intervention process would be initiated to determine if the student is progressing in math with additional support from general education. If math progress is noted, no further action related to special education would be needed. If there is a lack of math progress based on goal setting, documented progress monitoring, and various levels of intervention, this data would be shared with the IEP team to determine if a math goal should be added to the IEP. Can a VI, HI, or otherwise disabled student be considered SLD? Students with other disabilities may be considered for SLD, but exclusionary criteria must be considered. To qualify for SLD, the academic deficit cannot be caused by a visual, hearing, or motor disability; intellectual disability; emotional disability; or environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage. If a student is not found eligible for Exceptional Education services will he be able to continue receiving RtI support? Yes. I do interventions in the classroom all the time such as proximity seating, small group for reading, and reading aloud tests but my student is still not successful and earning poor grades. Isn’t this evidence enough that he is not responding to intervention and needs an IEP? No, in a Response to Intervention model a student must receive evidence-based interventions targeting specific areas of academic weakness. RtI requires implementation of an aim line, goal, and at least bi-weekly progress monitoring toward a goal. Proximity seating, small group for reading, reading aloud tests, etc. are accommodations or best teaching practices and are not evidence based interventions and would not be applicable in determining whether a child has a SLD using a RtI model. Can a student qualify for special education as a student with a learning disability if (s)he has participated in Tier II and/or Tier III interventions and has met or almost met his/her goals at the time of progress monitoring, but the student’s achievement is still below grade level? If the student is demonstrating the ability to make significant progress toward goals, that may not support identification as a student with a disability and the committee should carefully consider whether other factors may have impacted learning or achievement test performance prior to making an eligibility decision. How much consideration should be given to the student’s attendance/tardiness at school when making eligibility determinations? If the student is frequently tardy and misses the whole class instruction that is provided in a particular subject area (i.e.reading), but is present in order to receive individual interventions, is that not sufficient to document lack of growth that may be indicative of a disability? Tier II and Tier III interventions are intended to be provided in addition to core instruction. If the student is missing out on the Tier I instruction the teacher is providing 16 to the entire class, then Tier II and Tier III interventions are simply make-up for what was missed. That would be insufficient in order to determine that the student has a disability. What if the student is always present for the Tier II and/or Tier III interventions, but his/her inattention and hyperactivity do not allow him/her to benefit from the instruction? Can Specific Learning Disability be considered as a primary disability when the student demonstrates a lack of growth in the area of intervention? If the student’s attention and hyperactivity appear to be interfering with the student’s learning and the benefit of interventions, the team may choose to consider the category of Other Health Impairment for ADHD, rather than Specific Learning Disability. If a student is performing below grade level but is making progress does this count as expected progress? Additionally, how do we determine goals for students reading significantly below grade level? For example, if I have a 5th grade student who is reading on a 2nd grade level and has progressed to a 3rd grade level, can that student qualify because they are still not on grade level? Benchmarks and progress monitoring should generally match the intervention level. So if a 5th-grade student receives a supplemental reading fluency intervention using grade 2 texts, the school would use grade 2 reading fluency benchmarks and progress-monitoring measures to track student growth and to determine when the student has reached mastery at this off-level intervention point. It is also recommended that the school occasionally (e.g., once per month) assess an off-level student using benchmarks and progressmonitoring measures from his or her enrolled grade level as a means to assess the student’s abilities relative to same-grade peers. If an off-level student is tracked using only unrealistically difficult progress-monitoring measures from his or her enrolled-grade level, any actual evidence of student progress may be masked by the challenging nature of the assessment materials. This intervention assessment mismatch could lead the school erroneously to judge the student a “nonresponder” to an off-level intervention when in fact the student is actually making substantial academic progress. (taken from interventioncentral) My student received an intervention for reading fluency but eligibility/educational testing revealed very low scores on reading comprehension. Can the reading comprehension score be “evidence” for SLD criteria? The student must receive interventions in the area where a disability is suspected. REFERENCES -Adroin & Christ (2008) Evaluating Curriculum-Based Measurement Slope Estimates Using Data from Triannual Universal Screenings. School Psychology Review, 37 (1), 109-125. -Fuchs (2003) “Assessing Intervention Responsiveness” Conceptual and Technical Issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18 (3), 172-186 -NASP article “Response to Instruction in the Identification of Learning Disabilities: A guide from School Teams” -National Research Center for Learning Disabilities website 17 -Vaughn (2003, December) How Many Tiers are Needed for Responsive to Intervention to Achieve Acceptable Performance Outcome? Paper presented at the National Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY: Is a student with a brain tumor eligible under TBI? No. A brain tumor is considered a health impairment. Is a student with severe brain damage eligible under TBI? A traumatic brain injury must be caused by an external physical force. If the brain damage was caused by an external force, e.g., a gunshot wound or blow to the head, then the student could be considered for TBI. How current does the brain injury have to be to be considered for TBI? An injury that occurs anytime after the period immediately following birth can be considered for TBI if the injury meets the requirements of the definition. Does the injury have to be permanent? No. There are degrees of recovery from a traumatic brain injury. SECTION 504: When and how do we consider Section 504 eligibility? Section 504 eligibility should always be considered after a student is found ineligible for special education under IDEIA. An eligibility group may consider Section 504 eligibility alone when the impairment is solely a medically based disability with accommodations for the student as the main need. The eligibility group should carefully consider the Section 504 eligibility flow chart that is included in this manual. To determine eligibility for Section 504, the eligibility group must determine that there is a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits the student’s performance in a major life activity. An impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would substantially limit a major life activity when active. Be sure to identify the specific physical or mental impairment and write it in the summary of deliberations statement in the eligibility minutes. The determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity shall be made without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures. These include medication, medical supplies, equipment or appliance, low-vision devices, prosthetics including limbs and devices, and hearing aids and cochlear implants or other implantable hearing devices, mobility devices, or oxygen therapy equipment and supplies. Ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses are not included in this provision. The definition of a person with a disability contains the addition of reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, bending, lifting, standing, sleeping, and eating as “major life activities,” along with the established major life activities of learning, working, breathing, speaking, walking, hearing, seeing, performing manual tasks, and caring for oneself. The term “major life activity” also includes the operation of a major 18 bodily function. This definition of disability does not apply to impairments that are transitory (actual or expected duration of six months or less) and minor. In the summary of deliberations statement, also include how the physical or mental impairment substantially limits or impacts the major life activity. 17 ELIGIBILITY DECISION PROCESS CHART Child Study or Intervention Team Plan NO –– Provide IDEIA Procedural Safeguards IDEIA Does the child study or eligibility team suspect the child has a disability under IDEIA? YES Conduct IDEIA evaluation If not IDEIA eligible SECTION 504 Child Study or Intervention Team Plan NO –– Provide 504 Procedural Safeguards NO –– Provide 504 Procedural Safeguards NO –– Provide 504 Procedural Safeguards YES –– Provide 504 Procedural Safeguards NO –– Provide 504 Procedural Safeguards Does the child study team suspect a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity? Does the student have a physical or mental impairment? YES 504 Evaluation YES YES Does the impairment affect a major life activity? NO Do cultural, environmental or economic factors cancel out potential limitations of a major life activity? YES Does the impairment substantially limit a major life activity? Write 504 plan and provide Section 504 procedural safeguards. 20 Name: D.O.B. Autism Worksheet School: AGE: Meeting Date: GRADE: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Autism. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. STEP 3. DEFINITION: "Autism" means a developmental disability significantly affecting verbal and nonverbal communication and social interaction, generally evident before age three that adversely affects a child's educational performance. Other characteristics often associated with autism are engagement in repetitive activities and stereotyped movements, resistance to environmental change or change in daily routines, and unusual responses to sensory experiences. Autism does not apply if a child's educational performance is adversely affected primarily because the child has an emotional disturbance. A child who manifests the characteristics of autism after age three could be identified as having autism if the criteria in this definition are satisfied. There is documentation of any of the Pervasive Developmental Disorders, also referenced as autism spectrum disorder, such as Autistic Disorder, Asperger's Disorder, Rhett's Disorder, Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified including Atypical Autism as indicated in diagnostic references. Characteristics of Autism: (see criteria worksheets) □ Children with Asperger's Disorder demonstrate the following characteristics: Impairments in social interaction, such as marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction; failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level; a lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (i.e., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest); or lack of social or emotional reciprocity are noted; and Restricted, repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities such as encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus, apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals, stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms, persistent preoccupation with parts of objects. □ Children with Autistic Disorder demonstrate impairments in: Social interaction; and Restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior as listed above; and Impairments in communication, such as delay in, or total lack of, the development of spoken language (not accompanied by an attempt to compensate through alternative modes of communication such as gesture or mime). In individuals with adequate speech, marked impairment in the ability to initiate or sustain a conversation with others, stereotyped and repetitive use of language or idiosyncratic language, or lack of varied, spontaneous makebelieve play or social imitative play appropriate to developmental level is noted. □ Children with Pervasive Developmental Disorder - Not Otherwise Specified or Atypical Autism may display any of the characteristics listed above without displaying all of the characteristics associated with either Asperger's Disorder or Autistic Disorder. □ Other (Describe): AND The child's educational performance is not adversely affected primarily because the child has an emotional disturbance. AND STEP 4. STEP 5. There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of autism. List and/or describe: AND Due to the identified Autism, the student needs specially designed instruction. 21 CRITERIA FOR AUTISM DSM-IV-TR A. A total of six (or more) items from 1), 2), and 3), with at least two from 1) and one each from 2) and 3): 1) Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following: a) b) c) d) 2) Qualitative impairments in communication, as manifested by at least one of the following: a) b) c) d) 3) Marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors, such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body posture, and gestures to regulate social interaction Failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level A lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest) Lack of social or emotional reciprocity Delay in, or total lack of, the development of spoken language (not accompanied by an attempt to compensate through alternative modes of communication, such as gesture or mime) In individuals with adequate speech, marked impairment in the ability to initiate or sustain a conversation with others Stereotyped and repetitive use of language or idiosyncratic language Lack of varied, spontaneous make-believe play or social imitative play appropriate to developmental level Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following: a) b) c) d) Encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus Apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals Stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements) Persistent preoccupation with parts of objects B. Delays or abnormal functioning in at least one of the following areas, with onset prior to age three years: (1) social interaction, (2) language as used in social communication, or (3) symbolic or imaginative play. C. The disturbance is not better accounted for by Rett’s Disorder or Childhood Disintegrative Disorder. 22 DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic criteria for 299.10 Childhood Disintegrative Disorder A. Apparently normal development for at least the first 2 years after birth as manifested by the presence of age-appropriate verbal and nonverbal communication, social relationships, play, and adaptive behavior. B. Clinically significant loss of previously acquired skills (before age 10 years) in at least two of the following areas: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) C. Abnormalities of functioning in at least two of the following areas: (1) (2) (3) D. Expressive or receptive language Social skills or adaptive behavior Bowel or bladder control Play Motor skills Qualitative impairment in social interaction (e.g., impairment in nonverbal behaviors, failure to develop peer relationships, lack of social or emotional reciprocity) Qualitative impairments in communication (e.g., delay or lack of spoken language, inability to initiate or sustain a conversation, stereotyped and repetitive use of language, lack of varied make-believe play) Restricted, repetitive, and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, including motor stereotypes and mannerisms The disturbance is not better accounted for by another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or by Schizophrenia. Diagnostic criteria for 299.80 Rett’s Disorder A. All of the following: (1) (2) (3) B. Apparently normal prenatal and perinatal development Apparently normal psychomotor development through the first 5 months after birth Normal head circumference at birth Onset of all of the following after the period of normal development: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Deceleration of head growth between ages 5 and 58 months Loss of previously acquired purposeful hand skills between ages 5 and 30 months with the subsequent development of stereotyped hand movements (e.g., hand wringing or hand washing) Loss of social engagement early in the course (although often social interaction develops later) Appearance of poorly coordinated gait or trunk movements Severely impaired expressive and receptive language development with severe psychomotor retardation 23 Diagnostic criteria for 299.80 Asperger’s Disorder A. Qualitative impairment in social interaction, as manifested by at least two of the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) B. Restricted repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities, as manifested by at least one of the following: (1) (2) (3) (4) Marked impairment in the use of multiple nonverbal behaviors such as eye-to-eye gaze, facial expression, body postures, and gestures to regulate social interaction. Failure to develop peer relationships appropriate to developmental level A lack of spontaneous seeking to share enjoyment, interests, or achievements with other people (e.g., by a lack of showing, bringing, or pointing out objects of interest to other people) Lack of social or emotional reciprocity Encompassing preoccupation with one or more stereotyped and restricted patterns of interest that is abnormal either in intensity or focus Apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals Stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms (e.g., hand or finger flapping or twisting, or complex whole-body movements) Persistent preoccupation with parts of objects C. The disturbance causes clinically significant impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning. D. There is no clinically significant delay in language (e.g., single words used by age 2 years, communicative phrases used by age 3 years). E. There is no clinically significant delay in cognitive development or in the development of ageappropriate self-help skills, adaptive behavior (other than in social interaction), and curiosity about the environment in childhood. F. Criteria are not met for another specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder or Schizophrenia. 299.80 Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (Including Atypical Autism) This category should be used when there is a severe and pervasive impairment in the development of reciprocal social interaction or verbal and nonverbal communication skills, or when stereotyped behavior, interests, and activities are present, but the criteria are not met for a specific Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, or Avoidant Personality Disorder. For example, this category includes “atypical autism” - presentations that do not meet the criteria for Autistic Disorder because of late age at onset, atypical symptomatology, or subthreshold symptomatology, or all of these. 24 Deaf-blindness Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Deaf-blindness. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: "Deaf-blindness" means simultaneous hearing and visual impairments, the combination of which causes such severe communication and other developmental and educational needs that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for children with deafness or children with blindness. There is documentation of Deaf-blindness. Complete and attach: Visual Impairment including Blindness Worksheet Deafness or Hearing Impairment Worksheet AND STEP 3. The combination of the hearing and visual impairments causes such severe communication and other developmental and educational needs that cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for children with deafness or children with blindness. 25 Deafness Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Deafness. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: "Deafness" means a hearing impairment that is so severe that the child is impaired in processing linguistic information through hearing, with or without amplification that adversely affects the child's educational performance. There is documentation of Deafness. The child has (check all that apply): □ a bilateral hearing loss (sensorineural, or mixed conductive and sensorineural), □ a fluctuating or a permanent hearing loss, □ documented auditory dyssynchrony (auditory neuropathy), and/or cortical deafness Describe: AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to the Deafness. List and/or describe: STEP 3. AND STEP 4. Due to the identified Deafness, the student needs specially designed instruction. 26 Developmental Delay Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Developmental Delay. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION: "Developmental Delay" means a disability affecting a child ages two by September 30 through six, inclusive: (34 CFR 300.8(b); 34 CFR 300.306(b)) 1. (i) Who is experiencing developmental delays, as measured by appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures, in one or more of the following areas: physical development, cognitive development, communication development, social or emotional development, or adaptive development, or (ii) who has an established physical or mental condition that has a high probability of resulting in developmental delay; 2. The delay(s) is not primarily a result of cultural factors, environmental or economic disadvantage, or limited English proficiency; and 3. The presence of one or more documented characteristics of the delay has an adverse effect on educational performance and makes it necessary for the student to have specially designed instruction to access and make progress in the general educational activities for this age group. STEP 2. The child will be two by September 30 of the current school year through six, inclusive. AND There is documentation of a Developmental Delay, (a standard score of 70 or below) as measured by appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures, in one or more of the following areas (check all that apply): □ P ysical Development □ STEP 3. Social or Development Emotional □ Cognitive Development □ Communication Development, □ Adaptive Development □ Established Physical or Mental Condition that has a high probability of resulting in developmental delay; List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. The delay(s) is not primarily a result of cultural factors, environmental or economic disadvantage, or limited English proficiency. AND The presence of one or more documented characteristics of the delay has an adverse effect on educational performance and makes it necessary for the student to have specially designed instruction to access and make progress in the general educational activities for this age group. STEP 5. List and/or describe: 27 Emotional Disability Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Emotional Disability. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: "Emotional Disability" means a condition exhibiting one or more of the following characteristics over a long period of time and to a marked degree that adversely affects a child's educational performance: (34 CFR 300.8(c)(4)) 1. An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors; 2. An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers as shown by reports and information from multiple sources. Provide time frame for unsatisfactory peer and teacher relationships. Consider factors such as the inability to get along, feelings of isolation, withdrawal behavior, avoidance of communication, inappropriate fear of teachers and/or students (not an exclusive list). Describe: __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances as shown by reports and information from multiple sources. Consider behaviors such as anxiety, attention issues, excessive crying, curling up in a fetal position, hiding under furniture, paranoia, persecution, verbal and/or physical attacks on others for no apparent reason (not an exclusive list). Describe: __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 4. A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression, as shown by reports and information from multiple sources and as seen in more than one setting. Provide time frame for evidence of unhappiness or depression, such as changes in eating and/or sleeping patterns, persistent disobedience, low frustration tolerance, mood swings, self-destructive behavior, suicidal ideation, and underachievement (not an exclusive list). Describe: _________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems as confirmed by reports from multiple sources. Provide time frame for physical symptoms such as stomachaches or headaches related to school, school refusal, and high rate of absenteeism (not an exclusive list). Describe: Emotional disability includes schizophrenia. The term does not apply to children who are socially maladjusted*, unless it is determined that they have an emotional disability as defined in the Virginia Regulations. *(See ED/Social Maladjustment checklist) There is documentation of an Emotional Disability. One or more of the following characteristics, exhibited over a long period of time and to a marked degree (check all that apply): □ An inability to learn that cannot be explained by intellectual, sensory, or health factors; □ An inability to build or maintain satisfactory interpersonal relationships with peers and teachers as □ Inappropriate types of behavior or feelings under normal circumstances; □ A general pervasive mood of unhappiness or depression; or □ A tendency to develop physical symptoms or fears associated with personal or school problems. AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of an Emotional Disability. STEP 3. List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. Due to the Emotional Disability, the student needs specially designed instruction. 28 ED OR SOCIALLY MALADJUSTED CHECKLIST Complete this checklist as a team. At least seven items in column A required. You may check both or neither under characteristic. Column A Characteristic Emotional Disability Conscience development Self-critical; poor self-esteem; feelings of guilt Reality orientation Withdraws into fantasy; naïve; gullible Adaptive behavior Consistently poor Aggression Uncontrolled verbal or physical aggression towards self or others Bullying Victim or perpetrator due to poor social judgment Anxiety Tense; fearful; hypervigilant; paranoid, suspicious Depression Persistent mood of sadness or irritability with disturbance in functioning across environments Peer relations School behavior Locus of control Issues of trust Attitude toward authority Rationality Ignored or rejected; withdrawn; unable to form and maintain satisfactory age peer relationships Inconsistent compliance, response to structure, situations, relationships, and achievement Maintains external locus of control; therefore, manipulated by environment Wants to trust; feels insecure; can develop relationships Unable to comply consistently Unable to correctly identify a problem and articulate its causes or solutions Column B Social Maladjustment Egocentric; lack of empathy; little remorse Able to manipulate situations for gain; streetwise Situationally dependent Purposeful, premeditated aggression towards others Threatens and intimidates for social or material gain Indifferent; sullen; appears relaxed Sadness related to consequences of actions and adjustment to life circumstances, e.g., depressed because he/she got caught Accepted socially; outgoing; friends the same age or older Controls and manipulates circumstances and relationships for personal gain Maintains internal locus of control; able to manipulate the environment Does not trust those outside of close circle of friends and family Compliance based on personal agenda Dismisses ownership of a problem; lacks personal responsibility for actions *According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TR), a student with a conduct disorder (social maladjustment) displays a persistent pattern of behavior characterized by violating the rights of others and not following age-appropriate behavioral norms or rules. Behaviors include: A. Threatening or aggressive behavior toward people and animals, B. destruction of property, C. deceitfulness or theft, and D. serious violations of rules. Most or all behaviors will be manifested for the past twelve months, and at least one will be present for the last six months. Social/academic functioning will be markedly impaired. Such students may have little concern for others and may lack appropriate feelings of guilt or remorse. 29 Hearing Impairment Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Hearing Impairment. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: "Hearing impairment" means an impairment in hearing in one or both ears, with or without amplification, whether permanent or fluctuating, that adversely affects a child's educational performance but that is not included under the definition of deafness contained in the Virginia Regulations. There is documentation of a Hearing Impairment. Characteristics include (check all that apply): □ unilateral hearing loss (conductive, sensorineural, or mixed), or □ bilateral hearing loss (conductive, sensorineural, or mixed), or □ a fluctuating or permanent hearing loss, and/or □ auditory dyssynchrony (auditory neuropathy) □ other:__________________________________________________________ List and/or describe: AND STEP 3. The hearing loss results in qualitative impairments in communication/educational performance. AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to the Hearing Impairment. STEP 4. List and/or describe: AND STEP 5. Due to the identified Hearing Impairment, the student needs specially designed instruction. 30 Intellectual Disabilities Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting date Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Intellectual Disability. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION: "Intellectual disability" means significantly sub average general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period that adversely affects a child's educational performance. Significant limitations in adaptive behavior and intellectual functioning (must be present concurrently): □ At least 2.0 standard deviations below the mean, on an individually administered, standardized measure of intellectual functioning with consideration given to the standard error of measurement for the assessment. Standardized instrument used: ______________________ Score/Results:______________________ STEP 2. □ Significantly impaired adaptive behavior, at least 2.0 standard deviations below the mean on an individual standardized instrument of adaptive behavior. The following skills represent the three areas of adaptive behavior: Conceptual Skills - language and literacy, money, time, and number concepts; and self-direction Social Skills - interpersonal skills, social responsibility, self-esteem, gullibility, social problem solving, and the ability to follow rules, obey laws, and avoid being victimized Practical Skills – activities of daily living, occupational skills, healthcare, travel/transportation, schedules/routines, safety, use of money, use of the telephone Standardized instrument used: ______________________ Composite Score/Results:______________________ □ There is a developmental history (birth through 18) that indicates significant impairment in intellectual functioning and a current demonstration of a significant impairment is present. Age at Identification:_________________ AND STEP 3. There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to the documented characteristics of an intellectual disability. List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. Due to the intellectual disability, the student needs specially designed instruction. 31 Multiple Disabilities Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Multiple Disabilities. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: "Multiple disabilities" means simultaneous impairments (such as intellectual disability with blindness, intellectual disability with orthopedic impairment), the combination of which causes such severe educational needs that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for one of the impairments. The term does not include deaf-blindness. There is documentation of multiple disabilities. Simultaneous impairments (such as intellectual disability with blindness, intellectual disability with orthopedic impairment) are present and individual specific disability worksheets are attached. List disability worksheets completed: _________________________________________ AND There is documentation that the combination of impairments causes such severe educational needs that they cannot be accommodated in special education programs solely for one of the impairments. STEP 3. List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. The student does not have Deaf-blindness. 32 Orthopedic Impairment Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Orthopedic Impairment. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: “Orthopedic Impairment” means a severe orthopedic impairment that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. The term includes impairments caused by congenital anomaly, impairments caused by disease (e.g., poliomyelitis, bone tuberculosis, etc.), and impairments from other causes (e.g. cerebral palsy, amputations, and fractures or burns that cause contractures). There is documentation of an Orthopedic Impairment (check all that apply): □ Congenital anomaly □ Impairments caused by disease (e.g., poliomyelitis, bone tuberculosis, etc.) □ Impairments from other causes List and/or describe: AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to the Orthopedic Impairment. STEP 3. List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. Due to the identified Orthopedic Impairment, the student needs specially designed instruction. 33 Other Health Impairment Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Other Health Impairment. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION “Other Health Impairment" means having limited strength, vitality or alertness, including a heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment, that is due to chronic or acute health problems such as asthma, attention deficit disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, diabetes, epilepsy, a heart condition, hemophilia, lead poisoning, leukemia, nephritis, rheumatic fever, and sickle cell anemia and Tourette syndrome that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. There is documentation of an Other Health Impairment. The effect of the Other Health Impairment limits are identified and impacts the students in the area of (check all that apply): □ Strength □ Vitality □ Alertness (including heightened alertness to environmental stimuli, that results in limited alertness with respect to the educational environment) Indicate chronic or acute health condition: □ Attention deficit disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (see criteria worksheet) □ Asthma □ Leukemia □ Diabetes □ Nephritis □ Epilepsy □ Rheumatic fever STEP 2. □ Heart condition □ Sickle cell anemia □ Hemophilia □ Tourette syndrome □ Lead poisoning □ Other (describe): List and/or describe: AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of the Other Health Impairment. STEP 3. List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. Due to the identified Other Health Impairment, the student needs specially designed instruction. 34 Name: School: Completed by: DOB Date: (please print) ATTENTION DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER IDENTIFICATION WORKSHEET CRITERIA. A Student with AD/HD will meet all the following criteria. For each criterion indicate yes or no. _____ A. Either (1) or (2): 1. six (or more) of the following symptoms of inattention have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is maladaptive and inconsistent with developmental level: Inattention a. often fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes in schoolwork, work, or other activities b. often has difficulty sustaining attention in tasks or play activities c. often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly d. often does not follow through on instructions and fails to finish schoolwork, chores, or duties in the workplace (not due to oppositional behavior or failure to understand instructions) e. often has difficulty organizing tasks and activities f. often avoids, dislikes, or is reluctant to engage in tasks that require sustained mental effort (such as schoolwork or homework) g. often loses things necessary for tasks or activities (e.g., toys, school assignments, pencils, books, or tools) h. is often easily distracted by extraneous stimuli i. is often forgetful in daily activities 2. six (or more) of the following symptoms of hyperactivity-impulsivity have persisted for at least 6 months to a degree that is maladaptive and inconsistent with developmental level: Hyperactivity a. often fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in seat b. often leaves seat in classroom or in other situations in which remaining seated is expected c. often runs about or climbs excessively in situations in which it is inappropriate (in adolescents or adults, may be limited to subjective feelings of restlessness) d. often has difficulty playing or engaging in leisure activities quietly e. is often “on the go” or often acts as is “driven by a motor” f. often talks excessively Impulsivity g. often blurts out answers before questions have been completed h. often has difficulty awaiting turn i. often interrupts or intrudes on others (e.g., butts into conversations or games) _____ B. Some hyperactive-impulsive or inattentive symptoms that caused impairment were present before age 7 years. _____ C. Some impairment from the symptoms is present in two or more settings (e.g., at school [or work] and at home). _____ D. There must be clear evidence of clinically significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning. _____ E. The symptoms do not occur exclusively during the course of a Pervasive Developmental Disorder, Schizophrenia, or other Psychotic Disorder and are not better accounted for by another mental disorder (e.g., Mood Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Dissociative Disorder, or a Personality Disorder). 35 Specific Learning Disability Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Specific Learning Disability. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION: “Specific Learning Disability” means a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding or in using language, spoken or written, that may manifest itself in the imperfect ability to listen, think, speak, read, write, spell, or to do mathematical calculations, including such conditions as perceptual disabilities, brain injury, minimal brain dysfunction, dyslexia, and developmental aphasia. Specific learning disability does not include learning problems that are primarily the result of visual, hearing, or motor disabilities; of intellectual disabilities; of emotional disabilities; of environmental, cultural, or economic disadvantage. AND Criteria A child with a specific learning disability who requires special education and related services will meet ALL of the following criteria. In interpreting evaluation data, the committee must document and carefully consider information from a variety of sources. For each criterion indicate Yes or No and provide additional information where indicated. STEP 2. Yes No The student’s learning problems are not primarily the result of: 1. a visual, hearing, or motor impairment, 2. an intellectual disability, 3. an emotional disability, 4. cultural factors, an environmental or economic disadvantage, or 5. limited English proficiency. AND STEP 3. Underachievement The student does not achieve adequately for the student’s age or to meet Virginia-approved grade-level standards in one or more of the following areas, when provided with learning experiences and instruction appropriate for the student’s age or Virginia-approved grade-level standards. Consider a pattern of underachievement across norm-referenced achievement tests (e.g., WJ-III, WIAT-III, KTEA-III) criterion-referenced tests (e.g., SOLs, DRAs, PALs), classroom performance, curriculum-based measurements, and response to intervention. (check all that apply): Yes No □ Reading comprehension □ Oral Expression □ Basic reading skills □ Listening comprehension □ Reading fluency skills □ Mathematical calculations □ Written expression □ Mathematical problem solving Comment: AND 36 Yes No Data of Instruction and Assessment The underachievement of the child suspected of having a specific learning disability is not due to lack of appropriate instruction in reading, math, or written expression. The committee considered: STEP 4. □ Data that demonstrated that prior to, or as part of, the referral process, the child was provided appropriate Tier II/ research-based instruction in general education settings, delivered by qualified personnel; and □ Data-based documentation that repeated assessments of achievement at reasonable intervals, reflecting that formal assessment of student progress during instruction was compiled and reviewed. Check all that were considered: □ Child Study or Intervention Team Plan(s) □ Response to Intervention □ Phonological Awareness & Literacy Screening (PALS) □ Other: ______________________________ □ Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA) □ Running Records □ Curriculum-Based Measures Identify interventions as well as dates and durations: AND Yes No Evaluation outcomes (check all that apply): The student exhibits a pattern of strengths and weaknesses in performance, achievement, or both, relative to age, Virginia-approved grade-level standards, or intellectual development that is determined by the group to be relevant to the identification of a specific learning disability, using appropriate assessments. In identifying a pattern of strengths and weaknesses, the following criteria must be met: Yes No 1) The child has a deficit (at least one standard deviation) in one or more cognitive abilities/processes (broad or narrow) below what is expected for the child’s age, and the cognitive deficit(s) exists within a pattern of significantly higher abilities. STEP 5. Comment: Yes No 2) The identified cognitive deficit(s) is related (empirically or logically) to the underachievement, if identified above. Identify areas of underachievement that are related to cognitive deficit: AND Yes No There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of a specific learning disability. STEP 6. List and/or describe: AND STEP 7. Yes No The student needs specially designed instruction. 37 Speech-Language Impairment Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Speech-Language Impairment. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. STEP 2. DEFINITION: “Speech-Language Impairment” means a communication disorder, such as dysfluency (stuttering), impaired articulation, expressive or receptive language impairment or a voice impairment that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. There is documentation of a significant discrepancy from typical communication skills in one of the areas below (check all that apply): □ Fluency □ Receptive or expressive language □ Articulation □ Voice List and/or describe: AND STEP 3. The student does not demonstrate Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and/or is not a speaker of a sociocultural dialect that is the primary reason for the speech-language impairment. AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of Speech-Language Impairment. STEP 4. List and/or describe: AND STEP 5. Due to the identified Speech-Language Impairment, the student needs specially designed instruction. 38 Traumatic Brain Injury Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Traumatic Brain Injury. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION: "Traumatic Brain Injury" means an acquired injury to the brain caused by an external physical force, resulting in total or partial functional disability or psychosocial impairment, or both, that adversely affects a child's educational performance. Traumatic brain injury applies to open or closed head injuries resulting in impairments in one or more areas, such as cognition; language; memory; attention; reasoning; abstract thinking; judgment; problem-solving; sensory, perceptual, and motor abilities; psychosocial behavior; physical functions; information processing; and speech. Traumatic brain injury does not apply to brain injuries that are congenital or degenerative, or to brain injuries induced by birth trauma. There is documentation of a Traumatic Brain Injury. STEP 2. List and/or describe: AND STEP 3. There is documentation of impairments in one or more areas including (check all that apply): Cognition Language Memory Attention Reasoning Abstract thinking Judgment Problem-solving Speech Psychosocial behavior Physical functions Information processing Sensory Perceptual Motor abilities List and/or describe: AND STEP 4. The brain injury is not congenital, degenerative, or induced by birth trauma. (34 CFR 300.8(c)(12)) AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to one or more documented characteristics of traumatic brain injury. STEP 5. List and/or describe: AND Due to the identified Traumatic Brain Injury, the student needs specially designed instruction. 39 40 Visual Impairment including Blindness Worksheet Name: D.O.B. School: Age: Meeting Date: Grade: In application of the Virginia Department of Education’s Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia, this worksheet shall assist the eligibility group in applying criteria for students who are being considered for eligibility under the category of Visual Impairment. Review the definition, consider the items below, and note any additional information. Attach this worksheet to the Eligibility Summary Form and include any necessary documentation. STEP 1. DEFINITION: “Visual Impairment including Blindness” means an impairment in vision that, even with correction, adversely affects a child’s educational performance. The term includes both partial sight and blindness. There is documentation of a visual impairment and the child demonstrates the characteristics of blindness or visual impairment (check all that apply): A child with blindness has (check all that apply): □ Visual acuity in the better eye with best possible correction of 20/200 or less at distance or near; or □ Visual field restriction in the better eye of remaining visual field of 20 degrees or less. STEP 2. A child with a visual impairment demonstrates the following (check all that apply): □ Visual acuity better than 20/200 but worse than 20/70 at distance and/or near; or □ Visual field restriction in the better eye of remaining visual field of 70 degrees or less but better than 20 degrees. List and/or describe: AND/OR STEP 3. The child has any of the conditions, which may in the future, have an adverse effect on educational performance, or a functional vision loss where field and acuity deficits alone may not meet the aforementioned criteria (check all that apply). □ Oculomotor apraxia □ Cortical visual impairment □ A progressive loss of vision □ Other:__________________________ List and/or describe: AND There is documentation of an adverse effect on educational performance due to the visual impairment. STEP 4. List and/or describe: AND STEP 5. Due to the identified visual impairment, the student needs specially designed instruction. 41 QUALITY MEETING GUIDELINES 1. Participants are punctual. 2. Meetings start at the specified time. 3. Meetings are uninterrupted. 4. Participants listen actively. 5. There are no one-to-one or side meetings. 6. There is active participation. 7. Participants respect the agenda. 8. There is freedom to check process and ground rules. 9. Participants are willing to reach consensus. “Although I may not agree with the team’s decision, I can support it because it has been reached through a fair and open process that has considered my point of view.” 10. Participants share responsibility for team’s progress. 11. Timekeeping is observed. 42 QUALITY MEETING GUIDELINES (continued) Quality meeting guidelines describe agreements that team members can make to conduct meetings in a courteous and business-like way in order to save time and add to the productivity of the team. It is useful to post these guidelines at meetings, to review them from time to time and to renew the agreement to observe them. Team members will respect the time of others by arriving promptly at the appointed time and place of the meeting. To accommodate team members’ busy schedules and Meetings start at the specified make sure the meeting concludes on time, meetings will time. begin promptly at the specified time, whether or not all team members are present. To avoid disrupting group processes and delaying the Meetings are uninterrupted. conclusion of the meeting, team members will make whatever arrangements are necessary so as not to be interrupted during the meeting. Team members will pay close attention so that they can Participants listen actively. receive the information being presented, mentally process it, and formulate responses to the questions asked and issues raised. All team members will participate in the same meeting. There are no one-to-one or side There will be no one-to-one conversations or side meetings. meetings; questions, ideas, and thoughts will be shared with the group. Team members will use appropriate interactive skills to There is active participation. participate actively in the group processes: initiating, reacting, and clarifying. In order to complete the business at hand and conclude Participants respect the agenda. the meeting on time, the group should adhere to the agenda. In the event that additional issues arise that the group must deal with, then the agenda needs to be revised and the time reallocated. There is freedom to check process Each team member shares responsibility for keeping the meeting on track and, therefore, should not hesitate to and ground rules. call for a process check or a review of the ground rules. Participants are punctual. 43 QUALITY MEETING GUIDELINES (continued) Participants are willing to reach consensus. The quality consensus model does not require unanimous agreement. The quality model calls for the consideration of everyone’s opinion in a fair and open process. Consensus is reached when all team members agree that they can willingly support the team’s decision. In other words, consensus has been achieved when each team member either agrees wholeheartedly with the team or can sincerely make the following statement: “Although I may not agree with the team’s decision, I can support it because it has been reached through a fair and open process that has considered my point of view.” Participants share responsibility for team’s progress. Timekeeping is observed. In the event that one or more team members cannot agree to support the decision, consensus has not been reached and the process will continue until a decision is reached that all parties can support. Sometimes that “supportable decision” will be to select an alternative method for reaching a final agreement or to postpone the final decision. Each team member bears individual responsibility for contributing actively to a positive group process that supports the team efforts to complete specified tasks and/or achieve agreed-upon goals. To accommodate team members’ busy schedules and conclude the meeting on time, while at the same time making sure that all agenda items are addressed, timekeeping must be initiated and observed.