Structure of a widely conserved type IV pilus biogenesis factor that affects the stability of secretin multimers Melissa B. Trindade1#, Viviana Job1#, Carlos Contreras-Martel1, Vladimir Pelicic2, and Andréa Dessen1* 1Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel, UMR 5075 (CEA, CNRS, UJF, PSB); 41 rue Jules Horowitz, F-38027 Grenoble 2Department of Microbiology, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK *to whom correspondence should be addressed email : andrea.dessen@ibs.fr phone : (33)4-38-78-95-90 fax : (33)4-38-78-54-94 # these authors contributed equally Keywords : bacterial virulence, type IV pilus, secretin, crystallography, 3D structure 1 SUMMARY Type IV pili (Tfp) are arguably the most widespread pili in bacteria, whose biogenesis requires a complex machinery composed of as many as 18 different proteins. This includes the conserved outer membrane-localized secretin, which forms a pore through which Tfp emerge on the bacterial surface. Although, in most model species studied, secretin oligomerization and functionality requires the action of partner lipoproteins, structural information regarding these molecules is limited. In this work, we report the high resolution crystal structure of PilW, the partner lipoprotein of the type IV pilus secretin PilQ from Neisseria meningitidis, which defines a conserved class of Tfp biogenesis proteins involved in the formation and/or stability of secretin multimers in a wide variety of bacteria. The use of PilW’s structure as a blueprint reveals an area of high sequence conservation in homologous proteins from different pathogens that could reflect a possible secretin binding site. These results could be exploited for the development of new broad-spectrum antibacterials interfering with the biogenesis of a widespread virulence factor. 2 INTRODUCTION A common theme in bacterial pathogens concerns the use of long hairlike filaments, collectively known as pili, as colonization factors. There exists a wide variety of different pili, which are currently grouped according to their mechanisms of assembly 1, but type IV pili (Tfp) seem by far the more disseminated. Tfp, elongated, flexible filaments, are found in both Gramnegative and Gram-positive bacteria, and are key virulence factors in species as diverse as enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), pathogenic Neisseria species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi and Vibrio cholerae 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8. One of the main distinctive features of Tfp is their capacity to be retracted, which has been characterized at the level of a single filament in N. gonorrhoeae, and they have been shown to generate substantial mechanical forces 9. This promotes some of the additional Tfp-linked properties such as competence for DNA transformation, biofilm formation, bacterial aggregation, and a form of locomotion called twitching motility 10; 11. Tfp are mainly composed of pilin subunits and are defined by two distinct subtypes known as type IVa and type IVb, the former being by far the most widespread and accounting for most of the bewildering diffusion of Tfp noted above 12. N. meningitidis, our model organism, expresses type IVa pili and is, together with P. aeruginosa, the prototypal species for this Tfp subtype. Systematic genetic studies in these two species have defined the complete sets 3 of genes encoding proteins specifically dedicated to Tfp biogenesis 13; 14 which are virtually identical and composed of 15 and 18 proteins, respectively. However, the exact functions of a majority of these proteins remain unknown and consequently Tfp biogenesis is a poorly understood process. A systematic genetic analysis performed in N. meningitidis showed, however, that Tfp biogenesis can be resolved into discrete steps onto which each of the Pil proteins could be mapped 15. This provided evidence that most Tfp biogenesis proteins are actually dispensable for pilus assembly and serve to counteract PilT-mediated retraction of the fibers and to make them functional 15. A single protein, the secretin PilQ, was found to be essential for the late step in Tfp biogenesis during which the filaments, which are assembled in the periplasm, emerge onto the cell surface 15; 16. PilQ forms multimers that are essentially pores in the outer membrane through which pili are thought to emerge 15; 17. The GSP (general secretion pathway) secretin superfamily, to which PilQ belongs, also includes membrane-associated, oligomeric channels of the type II (T2SS) and type III secretion systems (T3SS) 18, as well as the secretin from the f1 filamentous phage 19. Secretins form SDS- , detergent-, and heat-resistant dodecamers 20; 21; 22; 23. Electron microscopy images of PilQ have revealed it to assemble in doughnut form, with a large cavity at the center, which could be the site through which the polymerized Tfp fiber travels 17; 20; 24; 25. 4 There is now growing evidence for the existence of a subcomplex of Tfp biogenesis proteins in the outer membrane, which is centered around the secretin and contains other proteins which are key for secretin multimerization, stability, and/or correct localization onto the outer membrane. For example, the Klebsiella oxytoca T2SS secretin PulD requires PulS for proper outer membrane association; in its absence, PulD remains associated to the inner membrane 23; 26. The T3SS secretin MxiD from Shigella flexneri requires MxiM for outer membrane recognition and oligomerization 27; 28, while in Yersinia enterocolitica, YscW ensures outer membrane localization and multimerization of another T3SS secretin, YscC 29. All of these proteins are known as pilotins, or pilot proteins. Secretins involved in Tfp biogenesis also rely on other proteins for stability of the multimers, such as BfpG, TcpQ and PilW in EPEC, V. cholerae and N. meningitidis, respectively, but they apparently do not need them for proper localization into the outer membrane 13; 30; 31. The latter protein, PilW, is of particular interest due to the fact that it is widespread, being found in bacteria expressing type IVa pili. It apparently plays the same role in all of these organisms since, in its absence, no secretin multimers can be detected in species of Proteobacteria as distant as N. meningitidis and Myxococcus xanthus, where it is known as Tgl 13; 21; 32; 33. In addition, as demonstrated in N. meningitidis, PilW is one of the proteins that serve to counteract PilT-mediated retraction of the fibers and makes the fibers functional 13. Altogether, this suggests that there could be an outer 5 membrane complex of Pil proteins involved in the late stages of Tfp biogenesis, which includes at least PilQ and PilW, that may interact directly. To date, one structure of a secretin partner protein has been reported: that of the Shigella flexneri pilotin MxiM structure of a domain of Neisserial PilP 27. 34 It should be noted that the NMR is also available, but this protein is now known not to affect the stability of PilQ multimers 35. Here, we report the high resolution crystal structure of PilW from N. meningitidis, and show that it is totally distinct from that of the aforementioned molecules. The structure reveals that the N-terminal and C-terminal regions both fold into tetratricopeptide (TPR) domains, whose boundary is stabilized by a disulfide bridge. Mapping of sequence similarities between PilW and its orthologs onto the PilW superhelical surface reveals a key region within the concave face of the TPR superhelix that could be essential for secretin stabilization, and thus, Tfp functionality. This information could be further exploited for the development of antibacterials that target the Tfp biogenesis machinery. 6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Characterization, crystallization, and structure solution of PilW PilW is an outer membrane-associated protein that is essential for Tfp biogenesis in N. meningitidis. It is conserved in all Gram-negative bacteria harboring type IVa pili and harbors an N-terminal lipoprotein signal peptide sequence; thus, PilW is likely to be a lipoprotein which, upon cleavage of a signal peptide of 19 residues, remains attached to the outer membrane through a lipid on the Cys20 side chain 13. Secondary structure prediction programs and protein domain database analyses (ScanProsite, InterProScan, SMART) predicted the presence of three sets of tetratricopeptide (TPR) motifs (res 36-69, 70-103, and 141-174), which could potentially form a TPR fold encompassing most of N-terminus of the molecule; the fold of the C-terminus of the molecule could not be predicted. A recombinant form of PilW, which lacked the N-terminal signal sequence (residues 1-19), was expressed as a cleavable MBP fusion and formed a covalent, disulfide-bonded dimer (through the interaction of the Cys20 residues from different monomers). In order to identify the optimal conditions for crystallization, the stability of PilW with respect to thermal denaturation in different buffer and concentration conditions was analyzed using fluorescence spectroscopy (see Materials and Methods). The PilW 7 covalent dimer crystallized at pH 5 in the presence of LiCl2, but poor data quality prevented us from solving the structure by any conventional phasing methodologies. Nevertheless, treatment of the covalent dimer with trypsin yielded a stable, monomeric form of the molecule in which the 7 N-terminal residues of the mature protein (thus including Cys20), had been removed, as confirmed by electrospray mass spectrometry and N-terminal sequencing. Crystals of monomeric PilW (residues 28-253) were in space group P6222, diffracted X-rays at the ESRF synchrotron to 1.6 Å, and contained 1 molecule per asymmetric unit. In view of the high quality diffraction of these new crystals, the structure could be solved using the MIR technique with 2.0 Å data collected on an in-house generator from a seleno-methionylated crystal and a native sample. Four seleno-methionine sites were easily identified through employment of this technique, which allowed automatic building of a large part of the molecule. Molecular replacement was subsequently employed in order to phase the highest resolution data. Data collection and structure refinement statistics are shown in Table 1. 8 A superhelix with a positive backbone PilW is comprised of thirteen anti-parallel -helices that fold into six TPR motifs; the motifs are organized as to form a super-helical structure (Fig. 1). PilW’s helices 5 and 7, which lie within TPR motifs 3 and 4, are interconnected by a disulfide bridge (Cys115-Cys150), pointing to the necessity of stabilizing the two halves of the TPR superhelix. TPR motifs are present in a wide range of proteins, and are involved in biological processes as diverse as transcriptional control and protein folding, in which they often mediate protein–protein interactions and the assembly of multiprotein complexes 36. The arrangement of several linked TPR motifs in tandem forms a superhelical assembly, generating both concave and convex surfaces. To date, most of the known TPR structures have been solved from eukaryotic sources, and have been shown to bind their cognate proteins either through the concave face of the TPR structure 37 or by employing inter-helical turns 38. Recently, 3D structures from bacterial TPRs have become available, and have revealed that TPRs can employ both concave and convex surfaces for cognate protein recognition 39. In the case of PilW, the concave region is decorated with highly conserved amino acids (see below), while the convex side is highly charged. Interestingly, the convex region is reminiscent of a ‘backbone’ decorated by a line of basic residues that span the entire length of the protein (Fig. 2a). This could be indicative of the fact that PilW employs its 9 convex region for interaction with other Tfp biogenesis factors, or the negatively-charged outer membrane. Within the concave region (Fig. 2b), a small enclave of positive charges is formed by Lys 179, Arg 183, and Lys 218. Tfp biogenesis lipoproteins with a common fold Fig. 3 displays a structure-based sequence alignment of PilW orthologs from diverse Proteobacteria known or suspected to harbor type IVa pili. These proteins have been shown to be essential for Tfp biogenesis in several model organisms such as N. meningitidis, P. aeruginosa and M. xanthus 13; 21; 40. Bioinformatic analyses for these molecules identify the presence of TPR motifs in all of them (not shown). These proteins share several major homology regions within the TPR superhelix, as evidenced by the analysis of residues highlighted in red boxes in Fig. 3, which are either identical or highly conserved in at least four of the aligned sequences. Notably, a large number of these residues are hydrophobic, and, in the PilW structure, are located within the interface of different helices. Thus, intra-helical stabilization is provided by the formation of hydrophobic interactions, as suggested for other TPR folds 41. This analysis suggests not only that these proteins display similar structures, but that the aforementioned residues probably play comparable roles within the different proteins. This hypothesis is strengthened by the recent solution of the structure of PilF from P. aeruginosa, 10 which also folds into a TPR superhelix 42, similarly to PilW (rms deviation = 2.14 Å over 171 atoms; PDB code 2FI7). PilW represents the first TPR structure stabilized by a disulfide bridge. This is likely to be a general feature for most of the Tfp biogenesis proteins of this class since the two corresponding cysteine residues (Cys115-Cys150) are conserved in most of the sequences shown in Fig. 3. However, in some orthologs, such as PilF 42 and Tgl from P. aeruginosa and M. xanthus respectively, these cysteines have been replaced by residues with hydrophobic side chains, which suggests that that a non-polar surface may also be involved in stabilization of this specific region; indeed, in the structure of PilF 42, these residues face each other, being located within a highly hydrophobic area. Nevertheless, Tgl from M. xanthus carries 4 other cysteine residues in addition to the Cys in the lipoprotein signal sequence (residues 171, 191, 201, 241, identified with green asterisks in Fig. 3). Hence, it is conceivable that, within a potential Tgl superhelix, the C-terminal half of the molecule is further stabilized by at least one disulfide bond. A potential insight into function PilW is one of the few proteins involved in Tfp biogenesis for which considerable functional information is available. As shown by a systematic genetic analysis in N. meningitidis, this protein is not essential for Tfp 11 assembly per se but is rather involved at late step of Tfp biogenesis during which, together with an important subset of Pil proteins, it counteracts pilus retraction and makes the filaments perfectly functional affects the stability of secretin multimers 13, 13. In addition, PilW an effect which was also confirmed in another piliated species, M. xanthus 21. These findings are suggestive of specific interactions between PilQ and PilW (or Tgl), and point to a likely outer membrane protein complex involved in the late stages of Tfp biogenesis. The structure of PilW, presented here, provides some clues as to its unique functional properties. First, it clearly strengthens the notion that PilW is not a pilot protein. The TPR superhelix fold strikingly differs from that of the only pilot protein whose structure is available. Indeed, MxiM, which is the pilotin of the MxiD secretin in the type III secretion secretin of Shigella 28, folds into a "cracked" -barrel capable of binding ligands within a central hydrophobic cavity 27. Second, the highly charged convex side of PilW could mediate interactions with a negatively-charged partner protein or even with the outer membrane. Third, and possibly the most relevant observation, relies on the fact that three of the residues which are absolutely conserved within all sequences presented in Fig. 3, Asn109, Tyr137 and Asn146, are located in proximity to each other within the concave region of the TPR superhelix (Fig. 4), on 5 and 7. Moreover, Asn109 is located within the Asn-Asn-Xhyd-GlyX-Xhyd-Leu motif (where Xhyd represents a hydrophobic amino acid), which is 12 highly conserved (blue background in Fig. 3). In PilW, Asn108 plays the role of central residue in a hydrogen bonding network involving Asn109 and Asn146; notably, this role is also played by Asn residues in all sequences displayed on Fig. 3, with the exception of Tgl from M. xanthus; in the latter molecule, this role seems to be played by a Thr residue, which could provide a single hydrogen bond through its O group. It is of interest that most of the aforementioned residues are clustered on the interface between TPR motifs 3 and 4, precisely the region that is stabilized by the disulfide bridge (Figs. 3 and 4). These observations suggest that the constellation of residues on 5 and 7 may be of particular importance for PilW function, and their clustering within the concave area formed by the TPR superhelix indicates that this could represent a protein-binding region. Notably, employment of protein-binding pocket predictive tools such as PASS (http://www.ccl.net/cca/software/UNIX/pass/pass_jcamd.html) also point to this region as a potential partner-recognition site. The identity of the potential partner that binds to this region is difficult to predict at this stage due to the multiple properties associated with PilW in N. meningitidis 13, which are for the most part still to be confirmed in other piliated species. However, the confirmation in M. xanthus that Tgl is also necessary for the stability of PilQ mutlimers 21 points to the secretin as the most likely protein recognized by the above protein-binding region. A surface representation of PilW in which residues which are identical (red) and similar 13 (orange) to Tgl is shown in Fig. 5, and reveals that the concave region of the TPR superhelix is highly conserved between these two proteins; in addition to the residues described above for all PilW orthologs, other potentially relevant amino acids within this region also include the Pro138-Thr139-Pro140 motif that immediately follows Tyr137 (highlighted in light blue in Fig. 3), all located within 7, and the loop which precedes it. These results suggest that PilW and Tgl (and maybe PilF) may recognize their cognate secretins in a similar fashion and thus act as chaperones for secretin multimers. However, the multiple functions associated with it indicate that it would be reductive to consider PilW only as a chaperone of secretin multimers, although it could not be excluded at this point that PilW mediates these functions indirectly, possibly through its contact with PilQ. In conclusion, with the three-dimensional structure of PilW now at hand, a detailed structure/function analysis of this protein is possible. Due to the wide conservation of this protein in bacteria expressing type IVa pili and its key role in Tfp biogenesis, such an analysis will certainly shed light on an insufficiently understood biological process. In addition, the common constellation of residues within the PilW superhelix identified in this work could represent a novel, tractable target for the development of potential antibacterials which could interfere with Tfp biogenesis without having to cross the inner bacterial membrane in order to exert their action. This in turn 14 could have far-reaching economic consequences due to the wide distribution of Tfp in human, animal and plant pathogens. 15 MATERIALS AND METHODS Cloning, expression and purification of PilW The region of the N. meningitidis pilW gene coding for amino acids 20253 of the full-length protein was amplified using conventional PCR methodologies and cloned into pCRII-TOPO (Invitrogen) using E. coli TOP10 (Invitrogen), to generate plasmid pYU17. After digesting pYU17 by EcoRI and HindIII, the fragment was subcloned in the pMAL-p2X vector (New England Biolabs) digested with the same enzymes. pYU18 was transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells. Protein expression was induced in Luria Broth with 0.5 mM IPTG at 30oC overnight. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and lysed by sonication in 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7.4, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 0.1 M aprotinin, 1 M leupeptin, and 1 M pepstatin. The supernatant was cleared by centrifugation and applied to an amylose column (New England BioLabs, USA) pre- equilibrated in lysis buffer. Sample elution was performed with a 10 mM maltose step, which was followed by treatment with 4 units of Factor Xa per milligram of protein. The cleaved protein was re-loaded onto an amylose column, and unbound samples were loaded onto a Superdex 75 column (GE Healthcare, Sweden). The purified PilW product contained 4 vector-derived residues (ISEF) followed by residues 20-253 corresponding to the mature PilW protein. 16 Pooled, concentrated fractions were employed in crystallization trials as described below. Subsequently, in order to facilitate purification, a histidine tag was introduced C-terminally to the signal peptide-encoding region of the malE gene by site-specific mutagenesis using the Quick Change II kit (Stratagene). This construct was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) cells and expression was induced as described above. After the lysate was cleared by centrifugation, the supernatant was applied to a Ni2+ Sepharose column in lysis buffer (with 20 mM imidazole), and protein was eluted with a step imidazole gradient. Samples were treated with trypsin at a 1:1000 ratio for 3 hrs; the reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 mM PMSF, after which the protein was reloaded onto a Ni2+ Sepharose column, used to trap the histidine-MBP tag. The flow through was subsequently loaded onto a Superdex 75 column in 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl. The eluted peak of PilW (28-253) was subsequently submitted to crystallization trials (below). Selenomethionine-substituted PilW was overexpressed in the same E. coli BL21(DE3) strain in minimal medium supplemented with thiamine (0.2 mg/mL) leucine, (50 mg/L), valine (50 mg/L), isoleucine (50 mg/L), lysine (100 mg/L), phenylalanine (100 mg/L), threonine (100 mg/L) and selenomethionine (60 mg/L). Purification was performed as described above 17 for the native molecule. MALDI-TOF analyses revealed the full substitution of four methionines. 18 Thermal stability assays PilW’s stability with respect to thermal denaturation was analyzed using fluorescence spectroscopy in order to identify optimal conditions for crystallization and biochemical analyses. Protein samples were incubated with SYPRO® Orange dye and heated between 20°C and 100°C; the dye binds to hydrophobic regions of a protein that become exposed during denaturation, and a fluorescent signal is measured 43. Samples were prepared in various pH, NaCl, and protein concentrations, and tested in 96-well thinwall PCR plates (BioRad) in a total volume of 25 µL. Protein samples whose concentration ranged from 0.1 to 4 mg/mL) were prepared in 0.1 M buffers of pH values ranging from 4.0 to 10.0, with NaCl concentrations of 10, 100, 250, 500 mM, 1M, and 2 M. 2.5µL of 50x SYPRO Orange (Molecular Probes) sample were added to each mix. Assays were performed using an IQ5 realtime PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) over a temperature range of 20°C to 100°C, with an increment of 0.2°C/step. At each step, excitation was performed at 470 nm, while emission of SYPRO® Orange fluorescence was monitored at 570 nm by employing a camera 43. The melting temperature (Tm) values of the protein in each condition were determined graphically from the first derivative of the fluorescence curves. These results suggested that PilW was unstable at a pH value below 5.3, and at a concentration value above 5 mg/ml. Crystallization trials were performed with protein samples at a maximal concentration of 2.5 mg/mL in the drop. 19 Crystallization, data collection, and structure solution Crystals of PilW (20-253) were obtained by the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method in 100 mM citrate pH 5.2, 1 % polyethylene glycol 6000, and 800 mM LiCl2, but as described in the Results section, could not be exploited for structure solution. Subsequently, crystals of PilW (28-253) were also obtained by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method by mixing 1L of the protein sample with 1L of well solution at 20°C. Crystals grew in 100 mM Tris pH 8.5, 800 mM Li2SO4, 10 mM NiCl2 and were cryoprotected by brief immersion in mother liquor containing increasing concentrations of glycerol (up to 15%), after which they were flash-cooled in the nitrogen stream. A first highly redundant native data set was collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) ID14-EH3 beamline (Grenoble, France), using 0.931 Å wavelength (Native-1). A second one was collected in-house with Cu K radiation (1.54 Å) using an ENRAF-NONIUS rotating-anode generator (Native-2). Finally, a selenium-derivatized crystal was also collected in-house using Cu K radiation. Diffraction images were indexed and scaled with the program XDS 44, and merged with the CCP4 program suite 45. SHELXD 46 was employed in the identification of the four expected Se sites, (∆f” 1.139 electrons) by employing both the Native-2 and seleno-methionine datasets. Heavy atom position 20 refinement and phasing were performed with SHARP 47; 48, while density modification was performed with the programs SOLOMON 49 and DM 50, and automatic model building was performed ARP/wARP 6.1 51. Once the model was traced in the 2.0 Å native data set, the molecular replacement program PHASER 52 was used to calculate phases for Native-1. Subsequently, COOT 53 was employed in cycles of manual model building, while cycles of restrained refinement were performed with REFMAC 5.2 54 as implemented in CCP4 program suite 45. Stereo-chemical verification was performed by PROCHECK 55 and secondary structure assignment was performed by DSSP 56. Data collection and structure refinement statistics can be found in Table 1. Figures were generated with PyMol (http://www.pymol.org). 21 REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Soto, G. E. & Hultgren, S. J. (1999). Bacterial adhesins: common themes and variations in architecture and assembly. J. Bacteriol. 181, 1059-1071. Merz, A. J. & So, M. (2000). Interactions of pathogenic Neisseriae with epithelial cell membranes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16, 423-457. Zhang, X.-L., Tsui, I. S. M., Yip, C. M. C., Fung, A. W. Y., Wong, D. K.-H., Dai, X., Yang, Y., Hackett, J. & Morris, C. (2000). Salmonella enterica serovar typhi uses type IVB pili to enter human intestinal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 68, 3067-3073. Doig, P., Todd, T., Sastry, P. A., Lee, K. K., Hodges, R. S., Paranchych, W. & Irvin, R. T. (1988). Role of pili in adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to human respiratory epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 56, 1641-1646. Hambrook, J., Titball, R. & Lindsay, C. (2004). The interaction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK with human and animal respiratory tract cell lines. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 238, 49-55. Karaolis, D. K., Johnson, J. A., Bailey, C. C., Boedeker, E. C., Kaper, J. B. & Reeves, P. R. (1998). A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 95, 3134-3139. Kaper, J. B., Nataro, J. P. & Mobley, H. L. T. (2004). Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 123-140. Bieber, D., Ramer, S. W., Wu, C.-Y., Murray, W. J., Tobe, T., Fernandez, R. & Schoolnik, G. K. (1998). Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science 280, 2114-2118. Maier, B., Potter, L., So, M., Long, C., Seifert, H. S. & Sheetz, M. P. (2002). Single pilus motor forces exceed 100 pN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 100, 16012-16017. Burrows, L. L. (2005). Weapons of mass retraction. Mol. Microbiol. 57, 878888. Mattick, J. S. (2002). Type IV pili and twitching motility. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 56, 289-314. Craig, L., Pique, M. E. & Tainer, J. A. (2004). Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 363-377. Carbonnelle, E., Helaine, S., Prouvensier, L., Nassif, X. & Pelicic, V. (2005). Type IV pilus biogenesis in Neisseria meningitidis: PilW is involved in a step occurring after pilus assembly, essential for fibre stability and function. Mol. Microbiol. 55, 54-64. Alm, R. A. & Mattick, J. S. (1997). Genes involved in the biogenesis and function of type-4 fimbriae in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 192, 89-98. Carbonnelle, E., Helaine, S., Nassif, X. & Pelicic, V. (2006). A systematic genetic analysis in Neisseria meningitidis defines the Pil proteins required for assembly, functionality, stabilization and export of type IV pili. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 1510-1522. Wolfgang, M., van Putten, J. P. M., Hayes, S. F., Dorward, D. & Koomey, M. (2000). Components and dynamics of fiber formation define a ubiquitous biogenesis pathway for bacterial pili. EMBO J. 19, 6408-6418. Collins, R. F., Frye, S. A., Balasingham, S., Ford, R. C., Tonjum, T. & Derrick, J. P. (2005). Interaction with type IV pili induces structural changes 22 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. in the bacterial outer membrane secretin PilQ. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1892318930. Peabody, C. R., Chung, Y. J., Yen, M.-R., Vidal-Ingigliardi, D., Pugsley, A. P. & Saier Jr., M. H. (2003). Type II protein secretion and its relationship to bacterial type IV pili and archeal flagella. Microbiology 149, 3051-3072. Linderoth, N. A., Simon, M. N. & Russel, M. (1997). The filamentous phage pIV multimer visualized by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Science 278, 1635-1638. Collins, R. F., Davidsen, L., Derrick, J. P., Ford, R. C. & Tonjum, T. (2001). Analysis of the PilQ secretin from Neisseria meningitidis by transmission electron microscopy reveals a dodecameric quaternary structure. J. Bacteriol. 183, 3825-3832. Nudleman, E., MWall, D. & Kaiser, D. (2006). Polar assembly of the type IV pilus secretin in Myxococcus xanthus. Mol. Microbiol. 60, 16-29. Chami, M., Guilvout, I., Gregorini, M., Remigny, H. W., Muller, S. A., Valerio, M., Engel, A., Pugsley, A. P. & Bayan, N. (2005). Structural insights into the secretin PulD and its trypsin-resistant core. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 3773237741. Hardie, K. R., Seydel, A., Guilvout, I. & Pugsley, A. P. (1996). The secretinspecific chaperone-like protein of the general secretory pathway: separation of proteolytic protection and piloting functions. Mol. Microbiol. 5, 967-976. Collins, R. F., Frye, S. A., Kitmitto, A., Ford, R. C., Tonjum, T. & Derrick, J. P. (2004). Structure of the Neisseria meningitidis outer membrane PilQ secretin complex at 12 A resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 39750-39756. Frye, S. A., Assalkhou, R., Collins, R. F., Ford, R. C., Petersson, C., Derrick, J. P. & Tonjum, T. (2006). Topology of the outer-membrane secretin PilQ from Neisseria meningitidis. Microbiology 152, 3751-3764. Hardie, K. R., Lory, S. & Pugsley, A. P. (1996). Insertion of an outer membrane protein in Escherichia coli requires a chaperone-like protein. EMBO J. 15, 978-988. Lario, P. I., Pfuetzner, R. A., Frey, E. A., Creagh, L., Haynes, C., Maurelli, A. T. & Strynadka, N. C. (2005). Structure and biochemical analysis of a secretin pilot protein. EMBO J. 24, 1111-1121. Schuch, R. & Maurelli, A. T. (2001). MxiM and MxiJ, base elements of the Mxi-Spa type III secretion system of Shigella, interact with and stabilize the MxiD secretin in the cell envelope. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6991-6998. Burghout, P., Beckers, F., de Wit, E., van Boxtel, R., Cornelis, G. R., Tommassen, J. & Koster, M. (2004). Role of the pilot protein YscW in the biogenesis of the YscC secretin in Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Bacteriol. 186, 5366-5375. Schmidt, S. A., Bieber, D., Ramer, S. W., Hwang, J., Wu, C. Y. & Schoolnik, G. (2001). Structure-function analysis of BfpB, a secretin-like protein encoded by the bundle-forming pilus operon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183, 4848-4859. Bose, N. & Taylor, R. K. (2005). Identification of a TcpC-TcpQ outer membrane complex involved in the biogenesis of the toxin-coregulated pilus of Vibrio cholerae. J. Bacteriol. 187, 2225-2232. Rodriguez-Soto, J. P. & Kaiser, D. (1997). Identification and localization of the Tgl protein, which is required for Myxococcus xanthus social motility. J. Bacteriol. 179, 4372-4381. 23 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. Rodriguez-Soto, J. P. & Kaiser, D. (1997). The tgl gene: social motility and stimulation in Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 179, 4361-4371,. Golovanov, A. P., Balasingham, S., Tzitzilonis, C., Goult, B. T., Lian, L.-Y., Homberset, H., Tonjum, T. & Derrick, J. P. (2006). The solution structure of a domain from the Neisseria meningitidis lipoprotein PilP reveals a new sandwich fold. J. Mol. Biol. 364, 186-195. Balasingham, S. V., Collins, R. F., Assalkhou, R., Homberset, H., Frye, S. A., Derrick, J. P. & Tonjum, T. (2007). Interactions between the lipoprotein PilP and the secretin PilQ in Neisseria meningitidis. J. Bacteriol. 189, 5716-5727. D'Andrea, L. D. & Regan, L. (2003). TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 655-662. Scheufler, c., Brinker, A., Bourenkov, G., Pergoraro, S., Moroder, L., Bartunik, H., Hartl, F. U. & Moarefi, I. (2000). Structure of TPR domainpeptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 101, 199-210. Yang, J., Roe, S. M., Cliff, M. J., Williams, M. A., Ladbury, J. E., Cohen, P. T. W. & Barford, D. (2005). Molecular basis for TPR domain-mediated regulation of protein phosphatase 5. EMBO J. 24. Quinaud, M., Ple, S., Job, V., Contreras-Martel, C., Simorre, J.-P., Attree, I. & Dessen, A. (2007). Structure of the heterotrimeric complex that regulates type III secretion needle formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 104, 7803-7808. Watson, A. A., Alm, R. A. & Mattick, J. S. (1996). Identification of a gene, pilF, required for type 4 fimbrial biogenesis and twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene 180, 49-56. Lamb, J. R., Tugendreich, S. & Hieter, P. (1995). Tetratrico peptide repeat interactions: to TPR or not to TPR? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 257-259. Kim, K., Oh, J., Han, D., Kim, E. E., Lee, B. C. & Kim, Y. (2006). Crystal structure of PilF: functional implication in the type 4 pilus biogenesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 340, 1028-1038. Yeh, A. P., McMillan, A. & Stowell, M. H. (2006). Rapid and simple proteinstability screens: application to membrane proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 451-457. Kabsch, W. (1993). Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 795-800. CCP4. (1994). The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. sect. D 50, 760-763. Schneider, T. R. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1772-1779. de la Fortelle, E. & Bricogne, G. (1997). Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement for multiple isomorphous replacement and multiwavelength anomalous diffraction methods. Methods Enzymol. 276, 472494. Bricogne, G., Vonrhein, C., Flensburg, C., Schiltz, M. & Paciorek, W. (2003). Generation, representation and flow of phase information in structure determination: recent developments in and around SHARP 2.0. Acta Crystallogr. D 59, 2023-2030. Abrahams, J. P. & Leslie, A. G. W. (1996). Methods used in the structure detrmination of bovine mitochondrial F1 ATPase. Acta Crystallogr. D 52, 3042. 24 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. Cowtan, K. (1994). DM: an automated procedure for phase improvement by density modification. Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Newsletter on protein crystallography 31, 34-38. Perrakis, A., Morris, R. M. & Lamzin, V. S. (1999). Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 458-463. Storoni, L., McCoy, A. & Read, R. (2004). Likelihood-enhanced fast rotation functions. Acta Crystallogr. sect. D 57, 1373-1382. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126-2132. Murshudov, G., Vagin, A. & Dodson, E. (1997). Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. sect. D 53, 240-255. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. (1993). PROCHECK: a program to check the stereo chemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallog. 26, 283-291. Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. (1983). Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577-2637. Gouet, P., Robert, X. & Courcelle, E. (2003). ESPript/ENDscript: extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3320-3323. 25 FIGURE LEGENDS Fig 1. Schematic arrangement and tertiary fold of PilW. (A) PilW consists of a signal peptide (SP), a lipoprotein-binding Cys residue (shown in red), and six TPR motifs. The region included in the crystal structure is shown in a red box. (B) PilW folds into a right-handed, superhelical assembly composed of 13 helices that comprise 6 TPR domains: TPR1 (1, 2), TPR2 (3, 4), TPR3 (5, 6), TPR4 (7, 8), TPR5 (9, 10), and TPR6 (11, 12). TPR domains 3 and 4 are stabilized by a disulfide bridge. Fig. 2 Surface potential of PilW. The PilW superhelix displays a highly charged surface, and is notably decorated by basic residues along its backbone. The two views (panels A and B) differ by 180o. Fig. 3. Sequence alignment of PilW orthologs. Bacteria include Neisseria meningitidis, Aeromonas hydrophila, Vibrio cholerae, Yersinia enterocolitica, Xylella fastidiosa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Myxococcus xanthus. Identical residues are highlighted with a red background, while similar residues are shown in red. Positions where there are four or more identical residues are shown in red boxes. The cysteines that participate in the formation of the disulfide bridge between TPRs 3 and 4 are marked with a green background. The conserved residues that line 5 26 are marked in blue, while the Tyr-Pro-Thr-Pro motif, which could potentially play a role in PilW (N. meningitidis) and Tgl (M. xanthus) functionalities, is shown in light blue. The figure was prepared by aligning all sequences with CLUSTALW, and subsequently employing ESPript 57 in order to display the structure of PilW onto the sequence block. Fig. 4. The concave region of the TPR superhelix is highly conserved. Asn108, Asn109, Tyr137 and Asn146 are located within 5-7, within TPRs 3 and 4. Fig. 5. PilW and Tgl display high similarity within their concave regions. Surface representation of PilW, where residues which are identical (red) and similar (orange) to Tgl are shown. The two proteins, whose functions could be very similar, display a high level of sequence identity and similarity within the concave region of the superhelix. 27 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The coordinates of PilW have been deposited in the Protein Databank with code XXXXX and are available pre-relase from andrea.dessen@ibs.fr. The authors would like to thank the ESRF ID14-EH3 beamline staff for help with data collection, Julien Offant and RoBioMol (LIM, IBS) for help with thermal stability assays, Bernard Dublet and the IBS mass spectroscopy facility (LSMP) for electrospray analyses and JeanPierre Andrieu (LBM, IBS) for N-terminal sequencing. This work was partly supported by INSERM and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (grant JC05_44953 to VP). 28 FIGURES Figure 1 29 30 Figure 2 31 Figure 3 32 Figure 4 33 Figure 5 34