RETURN FELLOW ADVISOR ACTIVITY Facilitation Exercise 1. Write an updated lesson plan for “What to Teach: Identifying the Key Concepts” found in the SAF Facilitation Guide, keeping in mind any obstacles you and/or your Fellows may have experienced while facilitating this session. In your updated lesson, you may want to consider the following: How could you improve this session’s flow to impact Fellows’ comprehension? What supplemental materials would you consider adding? Why? Would you alter the amount of time allocated to any portion of the session? How could you integrate subject content into your session? 2. Please provide a written rationale for each of the session activities that addresses how your proposed modifications to the session would enhance Fellows’ understanding of how Backward Design, key concepts, and supporting standards provide the contextual framework for effective unit and lesson planning. You may choose to use the pre-formatted template provided. The pre-formatted template contains an example of a modified “Do Now” portion to the session, along with accompanying rationale. You may write the lesson plan in any style you feel most comfortable with (narrative, etc.), but each portion of the lesson must contain the rationale for your changes and a description of any content material you wish to incorporate. Applicants are only required to address Activities 1-3 in their lesson plan. Applicants need not re-write the “Do Now” or “Closing” portions to this lesson, unless the applicant chooses otherwise. RETURN FELLOW ADVISOR LESSON PLAN EXERCISE MODULE 5, SESSION #2 What to Teach: Identifying the Key Concepts Name:________________________ Content Area:_______________ AGENDA INSTRUCTIONAL FLOW Do Now 1. Remind Fellows that this module will explicitly answer two of the most daunting questions asked by new teachers: What do I teach? And How do I teach it? Scheduled: 10 minutes Revised: 15-20 minutes “One research-based approach to lesson planning is through the use of Backward Design. Just as we found that finding the shortest route to Fort Lonesome was quickly accomplished by tracing a route backwards to our starting location, backward planning also facilitates effective instructional planning.” 2. Direct Fellows’ attention to the FA created flow chart, and read aloud each step of the Backward Design process. Then inform Fellows that the first place that deliberate instructional planning begins is with a close inspection of state standards. In order to read state standards with accuracy, Fellows must begin to understand Bloom’s Taxonomy. CONTENT SUPPLEMENTS AND MODIFICATIONS 1. FA created poster, “The Process of Backwards Design.” It will list the three main steps of Backward Design: Identify the key concept of the content area under study. Align assessments to the key concepts. Design instructional activities that ensure students’ mastery of the content. 2. FA created list of IEP goals and short-term objectives, including goals for academic, emotional, and 3. Direct Fellows to Handout 5.2.1, Bloom’s Taxonomy Resource; inform speech/language students. Fellows that before they evaluate state standards, they must review their understanding of Bloom’s. Allow Fellows to review the workbook sheet. 3. Bring in FA owned “Bloom’s Taxonomy Wheel” for Fellows to 4. Pair Fellows. review for possible incorporation into their own lesson planning process. 5. Have Fellows complete Handout 5.2.2, allowing them to create their own operational definition of each level of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Share. 6. Provide Fellows with an FA created list of IEP goals and short-term objectives. Ask Fellows to underline the appropriate verb associated with the annual goal and the short term objectives. 7. FA will then demonstrate that each of the written short term goals have lower order levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, all of which build up to the student’s annual “high order “ goal. Rationale for modifications and/or content materials: For the “Do Now,” I wanted to ensure that my Fellows understood the instructional importance of Backward Design and how it facilitates instructional planning. I specifically wanted a chart on the wall that noted the progression of activities required for Backward Design. The Backward Design flow chart was intentionally left relatively broad, rather than risk Fellows’ confusion. The chart will be used throughout the Module. I did not modify a significant amount of the “Do Now” activities, as I believe that the handouts were clear and benefited Fellows’ understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Having taught this “Do Now” with Cohort 16, I experienced a small degree of confusion when Fellows were asked to create their own operational definitions of Bloom’s Taxonomy levels. Misunderstandings were primarily addressed through group discussion. As a special education Fellow Advisor, I believe that it is important to integrate content specific examples and artifacts throughout SAF sessions. For the “Do Now,” I developed a list of IEP annual goals and their associated short term objectives. This IEP worksheet was distributed to Fellows in order to illustrate how an IEP’s annual goals (with “higher order” levels of Bloom’s taxonomy) are supported by carefully chosen short term objectives (generally consisting of lower taxonomy levels). For Fellows to become effective IEP writers, they must understand how IEP goals are formulated through real world examples. Accordingly, I will walk Fellows through the IEP worksheet, demonstrating how lower taxonomy levels (used in short term goals) purposefully build upon themselves to accomplish the larger taxonomy level stated in the annual goal. Due to the need to connect this foundational understanding of Bloom’s to IEPs, I have elected to alter the time allotted in this area by 10 minutes. Activity 1: Identifying Key Concepts Rationale for modifications and/or content materials: Activity 2: Clustering Supporting Standards Around Key Concepts Rationale for modifications and/or content materials: Activity 3: Communicating Key Concepts To Students Rationale for modifications and/or content supplements: