1 Auxiliary Material 2 Attributing intensification of precipitation extremes to human influence 3 Xuebin Zhang1, Hui Wan1, Francis W. Zwiers2, Gabriele C. Hegerl3, Seung-Ki Min4 4 1. Observational data 5 We use gridded annual maximum 1-day (RX1day) and 5-day (RX5day) precipitation 6 amounts available from the HadEX2 [Donat et al., 2013]. This dataset covers the period 7 1901-2010. A previous detection and attribution study on extreme precipitation [Min et 8 al., 2011] used RX1day and RX5day from HadEX [Alexander et al., 2006], which covers 9 1951-2003. Compared with HadEX, HadEX2 includes almost twice as many 10 precipitation stations and substantial improvements in spatial coverage (see Figure S1). 11 We conduct our detection and attribution analysis on the longest time period for which 12 there is good spatial coverage so that large area spatial averaging will reduce noise 13 from internal variability. Since observations started to become abundant in the 1950s 14 but significantly reduced around 2005, and most model simulations end in 2005, we 15 conduct our analysis over the period 1951-2005. To avoid possible data 16 inhomogeneities caused by changes in data availability, we only use long-term data. 17 Data from a grid box are not used if there are more than 10 missing years during 1951- 18 2005. Figure S1 shows the map of grid box locations of these long-term data. 1 Climate Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W2Y2, Canada. 3 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh #H93JW, UK. 4 School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Gyungbuk, 790-784 Korea. 2 1 19 The availability of Russian daily precipitation data was limited to the late 1990s at the 20 time of HadEX2 construction. As a result, HadEX2 has few grid boxes over Russia that 21 meet our missing data criterion. As Russia represents a large fraction of the Northern 22 Hemisphere mid-latitude land area, we augment HadEX2 with extreme precipitation 23 extracted from daily precipitation data that have become available recently from the 24 Russian Met Service via their website 25 (http://www.meteo.ru/English/climate/d_temp.php). 26 We used daily precipitation amounts observed at 600 stations covering time period 27 1874-2011 from this source. In 1966-67, the Hydrometeorological Services of the former 28 Soviet Union initiated an effort to account for light precipitation “to the last drop” and 29 introduced a wetting correction to each nonzero precipitation measurement (0.2mm for 30 liquid and 0.1mm for frozen precipitation) when at least one drop was extracted from the 31 gauge. This resulted in a substantial increase in the number of precipitation days and 32 affected annual total precipitation [Groisman and Rankova, 2001]. However, this 33 practice does not affect measurements of extreme precipitation. Gauge under-catch due 34 to wind, and changes in the use of instruments also affect precipitation measurement. 35 However, again, extreme precipitation measurements are mostly unaffected by such 36 data inhomogeneity issues [Groisman et al., 2013]. 37 RX1day is extracted from Russian station daily data if there are no more than 15 38 missing values in the daily amount of precipitation for each year. We compute 5-day 39 precipitation accumulations if there are at least 4 daily values within a given 5-day 40 window (if only 4 daily values are available within a given 5-day window, the value for 41 the missing day is set to zero). RX5day is extracted if no more than 15 values are 2 42 missing from all possible overlapping 5-consecutive days. Stations with less than 10-yr 43 missing during 1951-2005 in RX1day or RX5day are retained for the analysis. A total of 44 433 stations for RX1day and 427 stations for RX5day meet this requirement. The 45 RX1day and RX5day values at individual stations are then averaged within the 46 2.5x3.75° grid boxes, consistent with the approach used by Donat et al. [2013]. Grid box 47 values are converted into PI to replace the PI values from the original HadEX2. This 48 merged dataset forms our observational dataset. We also computed PI values from 49 station data and then averaged these PI values from individual stations within the 50 2.5x3.75° grid boxes. The resulting regional series are essentially the same (not 51 shown). The addition of Russian data improves data spatial coverage substantially 52 (Figure S1). 53 Area-averaged PI from the merged dataset differs from that calculated from HadEX2 54 (Figure S2), but differences in 5-year mean values are much smaller than for annual 55 values. The long-term trends remain in the merged dataset though the trend is smaller. 56 Wan et al. [2013] showed that the bias of northern hemispheric annual precipitation 57 anomalies tend to be smaller when spatial averages are calculated over networks with 58 greater spatial coverage. Analogously, we expect smaller bias in the spatial averages 59 calculated from the merged HadEX2 plus Russian data than in corresponding spatial 60 averages from HadEX2. Figure S3 displays 5-yr PI averages computed from different 61 datasets. Averages from the merged HadEX2+Russian data have a weaker trend due to 62 the increased spatial coverage over Russia, which includes many more northern Asian 63 locations with weak trends. When masked by the HadEX data availability, averages 64 from the merged HadEX2+Russian data yield a trend that is almost identical to that of 3 65 HadEX due to similar spatial coverage. In contrast, when HadEX2 alone is masked by 66 HadEX data availability, coverage is lower than in HadEX due to the lack of Russian 67 data, and a stronger trend results than estimated from HadEX. 68 2. Model data processing 69 Model simulated RX1day and RX5day under historical forcing (ALL) were extracted 70 from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) archive [Sillmann et 71 al., 2013]. At the time of analyses, 54 historical simulations from 14 coupled climate 72 models (GCMs) and 34 historical natural forcing (NAT) simulations from 9 GCMs were 73 available. The simulations in general start in the late 19th century and finish in the early 74 21th century. Many modelling centers do not provide ALL and NAT forcing simulations 75 beyond 2005. Over 15000 model-years of pre-industrial control (CTL) simulations 76 conducted with 31 GCMs are also available. We extracted all of the available simulated 77 daily precipitation data from NAT and CTL simulations through the PCMDI CMIP5 78 website and computed RX1day and RX5day. Since different GCMs have different 79 spatial resolutions we interpolated model indices to the HadEX2 grid at 2.5°x3.75° 80 resolution using distance weighting average remapping implemented in the Climate 81 Data Operators (https://code.zmaw.de/projects/cdo) for the subsequent analysis. 82 Model simulated indices for 1951-2005 for each of the available ALL and NAT runs are 83 masked using the merged dataset to mimic the availability of observational data. They 84 are then converted to PI (see main paper). Figure S5 shows PI trends from 85 observations and model simulations. Overall, there is a spatially consistent increasing 86 trend over North America and Europe. Russia does not show spatially consistent 87 positive or negative trends, as is also the case in annual total precipitation [Min et al., 4 88 2008]. This explains the smaller trend in PI averages when Russian data are included 89 (Figure S2). Multi-model simulated ALL trend is in general, positive almost everywhere. 90 The model-simulated NAT trend is mixed with regions of positive and negative changes, 91 but overall, it is weakly negative. 92 Note that averaging of multi-model PI trends substantially reduces the spatial variability 93 in trends that is induced by internal climate variability, and thus the multi-model mean 94 trends should not be expected to be of similar magnitude to observed trends on the 95 grid-box scale. Spatially smoothing the observed trends (e.g., by applying a 9 grid-box 96 spatial moving average to the observed trends) dampens internal variability 97 considerably and produces observational maps that are more directly comparable to the 98 multi-model maps (Fig. S5). It should also be noted, however, that the smoothed 99 observational map contains regional features that may be related to the specific 100 realization of internal variation that we are experiencing. Individual model simulations 101 also have features of similar scale, but since these are of natural internal origin, they are 102 filtered out when multi-model PI- trends are averaged. Note that the model maps are 103 spatially very homogenous, as expected (see discussion in the main paper, and also 104 Hegerl et al., 2004), limiting the prospects for the separation of signals based on the 105 expected spatial features of the responses to forcing. 106 Model PIs are spatially averaged to produce NH or regional series. For the same forcing 107 group, signals are estimated by first computing single-model ensemble means and then 108 averaging the model-means. Model simulated indices for 1896-1950 are also used for 109 internal variability estimation. For this purpose, each of the available ALL and NAT runs 110 is masked using the merged dataset for 1951-2005 in a way such that the data 5 111 availability from the model year (e.g., 1896) is the same as that from the corresponding 112 observation year (e.g., 1951). These model-simulated segments are then converted to 113 PI and averaged across the space to produce regional series. Ensemble means from 114 individual GCMs are removed. The available control simulations from each model are 115 divided into 55-yr chunks. These are then masked using the merged observational 116 dataset such that the data availability in each model year of each 55-yr chunk is the 117 same as that from the corresponding observation year over the 55-yr period. Data from 118 CTL simulations are converted to PI by fitting a GEV distribution at each grid box to 119 RX1day and RX5day series representing the entire length of the control simulation. 120 Regional averaged PIs are split into an equal number of 55-yr chunks from each 121 model’s CTL run and 0.5 (the mean probability) is subtracted. We use control 122 simulations and the inter-ensemble differences from ALL and NAT simulations to 123 construct two independent noise datasets N1 and N2 . N1 includes inter-ensemble 124 differences for 1896-1950 and half of the control simulations while N2 includes inter- 125 ensemble differences for 1951-2005 and the remaining half of the control simulations. 126 They are used to produce two independent estimates of internal variability covariance 127 ( C N 1 and C N 2 ) respectively. In total, there are 142, 54, and 34 55-yr chunks respectively 128 from CTL, ALL, and NAT simulations for the estimation of each covariance matrix. 129 3. Single-signal non-optimized analysis. 130 We also conducted the single-signal analyses using the non-optimized analysis method 131 of Polson et al. [2013]. In a nutshell, model-simulated signals are fitted to observation 132 via the TLS method without pre-whitening residuals as in the optimal generalized TLS 133 approach of Allan and Stott [2003]. Since the distribution of the scaling factors cannot 6 134 be determined analytically in this case without making the unrealistic assumption that 135 the residuals are independent and identically distributed, confidence intervals for the 136 scaling factors are estimated with a resampling scheme that takes the covariance 137 structure of the residuals into account. This is done by adding model simulated noise to 138 the best-fit reconstruction of the signal with a bootstrap procedure. Details of the 139 method are described in Polson et al. [2013]. 140 Figure S6 shows scaling factor best estimates and their 90% confidence intervals for 141 ALL, ANT and NAT based on single-signal analyses of 5-yr mean PI. Results are 142 essentially the same as those obtained with the optimized analyses: the 90% 143 confidence intervals for scaling factors from the non-optimized analyses are in general 144 wider (but not to a large extent). It appears that there is not a great advantage to use 145 the optimized method in this case. 146 4. Detection and attribution results for annual mean PI 147 Compared with multi-year mean PI, the annual mean PI series has higher temporal 148 resolution and thus more data points. This requires the estimation of a much larger 149 covariance matrix that may no longer be of full rank given limited model data. In this 150 case, dimension reduction is required so that estimated covariance matrix will be of full 151 rank and thus be invertible. Also, importantly, dimension reduction may be necessary to 152 ensure that the analysis is performed at temporal and spatial scales at which the GCMs 153 represent internal variability well, avoiding small scales at which variability may be 154 underestimated [Hegerl et al., 1997, Allen and Tett, 1999]. Thus it is important to 155 evaluate whether the variability in the regression residual is consistent with model 156 simulated variability. A typical approach in such cases is to reduce data dimension by 7 157 projecting both observations and model simulations onto the leading Empirical 158 Orthogonal Functions (EOFs) estimated from model simulated internal variability. The 159 maximum number of EOFs that can be retained is often determined by a residual 160 consistency test [Allen and Stott, 2003] such that model simulated variability is not 161 smaller than the variability in the regression residual. We use the formula of Ribes and 162 Terray [2013] to compute critical values for this statistic. Figure S7 displays residual 163 consistency test results for Northern Hemisphere land area averages for single-signal 164 analyses. In general, model simulated variability becomes smaller than that of 165 regression residual only when a large number (>40) of EOFs are retained in the 166 truncation. The scaling factor and its 90% confidence interval vary only slowly in relation 167 to the number of EOFs retained in the analysis (Figure S8). Figure S9 shows results 168 from 2-signal analysis, corresponding to EOF truncations under which model simulated 169 variability is consistent with that of residuals. For NH or ML and TR two-region 170 combined, the effect of anthropogenic forcings can be detected in extreme precipitation 171 observations when simultaneously estimating anthropogenic and naturally forced 172 changes while the effect of natural forcings is not detectable. This conclusion is robust 173 across a wide range of EOF truncations. Model simulated variability is also consistent 174 with that of the residuals corresponding to these EOF truncations. However, for the 175 NA+EU+AS three region analysis, ANT and NAT cannot be jointly detected and ANT 176 cannot be separately detected. Overall, optimal detection analysis on annual series 177 does not provide much more information than that of 5-year analysis since the annual PI 178 analysis can only be conducted on a reduced dimension that is not much larger than 179 that of 5-yr mean analysis. 8 180 181 5. Sensitivity of detection and attribution results to different time period and GCMs used 182 To examine whether the detection and attribution results presented in the main text are 183 sensitive to the time period used in the analysis, we also conducted an analysis for 184 the1951-2000 period that was used in Min et al. [2011] for NH, ML+TR, and 185 NA+EU+AS. Figure S10 displays scaling factors from single-signal analyses and Figure 186 S11 shows results for two-signal analyses. Overall, results are very similar to those for 187 1951-2005 described in the main text. 188 We also examined if the two-signal detection results are sensitive to the differences 189 among the GCMs being used in the estimate of ALL and NAT signals by estimating ALL 190 and NAT signals from simulations of the 7 GCMs for which both ALL and NAT 191 simulations are available. Figure S12 shows results from two-signal analyses for 5-yr 192 mean PI series for NH, ML+TR, and NA+EU+AS over period 1951-2005. These results 193 are also similar to those in Fig. 3 of the main paper. 194 195 Additional References: 196 Groisman, P. Y.and E. Y. Rankova (2001), Precipitation trends over the Russian 197 permafrost-free zone: removing the artifacts of pre-processing. Int. J. Climatol., 21, 657- 198 678 . 199 Groisman, P.Ya., R.W. Knight and O.G. Zolina (2013), Recent trends in regional and 200 global extreme precipitation patterns. Chapter 5.03 in Pielke, R. Sr., Hossain F., et al. 9 201 (eds) Water Encyclopedia (Elsevier Sciences) Climate Vulnerability: Understanding and 202 Addressing Threats to Essential Resources. Elsevier Publishing House, in press. 203 204 10 205 Table S1. List of coupled model simulations available at the time of analysis and used in 206 this study, ٭marks GCMs from which both ALL and ANT simulations are available. Model Bcc-csm1-1 CanESM2٭ CCSM4 CNRM-CM5٭ CSIRO_Mk3-6-0٭ FGOALS-s2 GFDL-CM3٭ HadGEM2-ES٭ IPSL-CM5A-LR٭ IPSL-CM5A-MR MIROC5 MIROC-ESM٭ MPI-ESM-LR MPI-ESM-MR MRI-CGCM3-p1 NorESM1-M ACCESS1-0 ACCESS1-3 Bcc-csm1-1-m BNU-ESM CESM1-BGC CMCC-CM CMCC-CMS EC-EARTH GFDL-ESM2G GFDL-ESM2M HadGEM2-CC Inmcm4 IPSL-CM5B-LR MIROC-ESM-CHEM MPI-ESM-P ALL 1896-2005 NAT 1896-2005 Pre-industrial control (CTL) [# of runs/# of 55-yr [# of runs/# of 55- simulations chunks] yr chunks] [# of 55-yr chunks] 3 5 5 5 3 5 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 14 GCMs 5 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 9 GCMs 8 18 2 14 8 8 8 10 18 4 12 8 18 18 8 8 4 8 6 10 8 6 8 8 8 8 4 8 4 4 20 31 GCMs 54 runs/108 chunks 34 runs/68 chunks 284 chunks Sum 207 11 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 Table S2. Estimated attributable changes in PI (δPI, in percent), in percentage of annual extreme precipitation, and return periods in 2000s for a 20-yr event in the 1950s in RX1day and RX5day due to anthropogenic forcing. The second column indicates spatial domains used in the detection and attribution analyses for one (NH), two (ML+TR) and three (NA+EU+AS) dimensions. The third column indicates the results for single-signal (ANT) or two-signal (ANT+NAT) analysis. The first, second, third columns under RX1day and RX5day correspond to results for the lower 5%, the median, and the upper 95% of changes, respectively. RX1day NH δPI (%) ML+TR NA+EU+AS NH Changes in annual extreme precipitation (%) ML+TR NA+EU+AS Return period in 2000s for a 20-yr event in 1950s (year) NH ML+TR RX5day 2signal 1.544 3.923 6.333 2.396 4.743 7.158 ANT 1.685 4.049 6.463 2.839 5.112 7.486 2signal 1.569 4.069 6.614 1.926 4.396 6.946 ANT 1.776 4.250 6.790 2.527 4.893 7.366 2signal 1.353 3.541 5.774 2.354 4.650 7.039 ANT 1.383 3.506 5.664 2.550 4.708 6.950 2signal 1.249 3.243 5.356 1.910 3.859 5.958 ANT 1.365 3.351 5.474 2.272 4.174 6.250 2signal 1.270 3.369 5.610 1.529 3.566 5.770 ANT 1.439 3.524 5.769 2.016 3.987 6.143 2signal 1.093 2.917 4.858 1.875 3.781 5.852 ANT 1.117 2.887 4.760 2.035 3.830 5.773 2signal 18 15 12 16 14 11 ANT 18 15 12 16 13 11 2- 18 15 12 17 14 12 12 signal NA+EU+AS ANT 17 14 12 16 14 11 2signal 18 15 13 16 14 12 ANT 18 15 13 16 14 12 216 13 217 218 219 220 221 Figure S1. Locations of long-term grids for RX1day from HadEX and HadEX2. A grid is 222 considered as a long-term grid if there are no more than 10 missing years during 1951- 223 2003 for HadEX or during 1951-2005 for HadEX2. Note that because of missing values 224 in the more recent years, some Russian grid boxes that were considered to have 225 sufficient records in HadEX (up to 2003) do not meet the selection criteria for HadEX2 226 (up to 2005). Black dots, green circles, and red circles indicate HadEX, HadEX2, and 227 merged HadEX2+Russian data points, respectively. The horizontal dashed black line 228 shows the division between the tropics and middle-latitude regions, while the vertical 229 blue lines delineate the three west-east regions used in the analyses. 230 231 14 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 Figure S2. Time series of annual (thin lines) and non-overlapping 5-yr mean (thick lines) area-averaged PI over Northern Hemisphere land during 1951-2005. a, RX1day, b, RX5day. For each panel, red lines represent averages obtained from HadEX2 data while blue lines from merged HadEX2/Russian data. 242 15 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 Figure S3. 5-yr average of PI for RX1Day based on different datasets: HadEX, HadEX2, and HadEX2+Russia are averages from their respective long-term grids; HadEX2+HadEXmask and HadEX2+Russia+HadEXmask are averages from HadEX2 and the merged HadEX2+Russian data but masked by the availability of HadEX longterm grids. 16 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 Figure S4. 5-yr average PI for RX5day over Northern Hemispheric land based on merged HadEX2 and Russia data computed by (1) fitting GEV distributions to individual grids (GEV), and (2) by using a ranking based method (ranking) where PIt=(nt0.31)/(N+0.38)*100. Here N is the number of years in the record while nt is the rank of the data value in year t. 17 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 RX1day, OBS RX5day, OBS RX1day, OBS, Smoothed RX5day, OBS, Smoothed RX1day, ALL RX5day, ALL RX1day, NAT RX5day, NAT Figure S5. Linear trends of extreme precipitation indices (PI) during 1951-2005 in observations (OBS, first row; and OBS with 9-point spatial smoothing, second row), in model simulations with combined anthropogenic and natural forcing (ALL, third row), in model simulations with natural forcing (NAT, fourth row). For each pair of panels, results are shown for annual maximum one-day (RX1day) and five-day (RX5day) precipitation amounts. For model simulations, ensemble means of trends from individual simulations are displayed. Units: probability (in percent) over 55 year period. 274 275 18 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 Figure S6. Results from single-signal non-optimized detection analyses of extreme precipitation indices for RX1day (upper panel) and RX5day (lower panel). Best estimates (data points) and 5-95% confidence intervals (error bars) of the scaling factors are displayed for ALL, ANT and NAT, when using five-year mean PI averaged over mid-latitude (ML), northern tropics (TR), western Hemisphere land (NA), western East Hemisphere land (EU), and eastern East Hemisphere land (AS), Northern Hemisphere (NH), and when using two regional averages (ML+TR) or three regional averages (NA+EU+AS). 287 19 288 All Ant NH ML+TR NA+EU+AS 289 290 291 292 Figure S7. Residual consistency statistics for RX1day and RX5day annual mean PI as a function of number of EOFs retained when covariance matrices. C N 1 and C N 2 293 294 295 are estimated with independent noise data N1 and N2, respectively. The pink and blue curves depict the 5%-95% acceptance region for the test of consistency between model-simulated and residual-observed variance. 296 20 297 ALL ANT NH ML+TR NA+EU+AS 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 Figure S8. Estimated scaling factors and their 90% confidence intervals from singlesignal analyses for annual series corresponding to different number of EOFs retained in the analyses for NH (upper panel), ML+TR (middle panel), and NA+EU+AS (lower panel). 306 21 307 RX1day RX5day NH ML+TR NA+EU+AS 308 309 310 311 312 313 Figure S9. Estimated scaling factors and their 90% marginal confidence intervals and 90% joint confidence region from two-signal analyses for annual series corresponding to different number of EOFs returned in the analyses for NH (upper panel), ML+TR (middle panel), and NA+EU+AS (lower panel). 22 314 315 Figure S10: Results from single-signal optimal detection analyses of extreme 316 precipitation indices for RX1day and RX5day for time period 1951-2000. Best estimates 317 (data points) and 5-95% confidence intervals (error bars) of the scaling factors are 318 displayed for ALL (red), ANT (green) and NAT (blue), when using five-year mean PI 319 averaged over Northern Hemisphere (NH), and when using two regional averages 320 (ML+TR) or three regional averages (NA+EU+AS). 321 23 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 a: RX1day, NH b: RX1day, ML+TR c: RX1day, NA+EU+AS d: RX5day, NH e: RX5day, ML+TR f: RX5day, NA+EU+AS Figure S11: Results from two-signal optimal detection analyses of extreme precipitation indices. a, b, c, for RX1day, and d, e, f, for RX5day for time period 1951-2000. Data points of the crossing between two error bars represent best estimates of the scaling factors for ANT and NAT. The 5-95% marginal confidence intervals of the scaling factors are displayed as error bars. The 5-95% joint confidence regions are represented by ellipses. The left, central, and right panels are for results when using five-year mean PI averaged over Northern Hemisphere (NH), when using two regional averages combined (ML+TR), and using three regions combined (NA+EU+AS). 333 24 334 335 336 a: RX1day, NH b: RX1day, ML+TR c: RX1day, NA+EU+AS d: RX5day, NH e: RX5day, ML+TR f: RX5day, NA+EU+AS Figure S12: Same as in Fig. S11 but for 1951-2005 using GCM simulations from the 7 GCMs for which both ALL and NAT runs are available. 337 25 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 a: RX1day, NH b: RX1day, ML+TR c: RX5day, NH d: RX5day, ML+TR Figure S13: Results from two-signal optimal detection analyses of extreme precipitation indices. a and b for RX1day, and c and d for RX5day. The intersections of the two error bars represent best estimates of the scaling factors for ANT and NAT. The 5-95% marginal confidence intervals of the scaling factors are displayed as error bars. The 595% joint confidence regions are represented by ellipses. The left and right panels are for results when using five-year mean PI averaged over Northern Hemisphere (NH), and when using two (ML+TR) regional averages. 347 26