King’s College London Athena SWAN submission – 2008 Submission Report - Summary 1. Background and existing relevant initiatives The College undertook a range of quantitative and qualitative research activities in order to inform its Gender Equality Scheme (GES). As part of this the issues experienced by women academics were prioritised. The following initiatives are being promoted under the banner of the King’s Women’s Advancement Initiative (WAI): Membership of the Athena SWAN Charter; Development of an innovative Pilot Mentoring Scheme for women academics at the Institute of Psychiatry (IoP), which if successful will be rolled out more widely and evaluated with a randomised controlled trial; A programme of research to explore career progression barriers experienced by women academics and evaluate a range of interventions to respond to these. A broad range of other initiatives are occurring across the College which are relevant to women working in science, engineering and technology (SET) disciplines, some of these include: The King’s College Women’s Network has been operating for 3 years and hosts four meetings a year on topics of interest and relevance to women staff. A dedicated Childcare Adviser provides support for staff and students on childcare provision. Graduate School training opportunities are open to all postgraduate research students and research staff, with women-only opportunities provided as appropriate The College promotion procedures now more fully recognise innovations in teaching as relevant criteria for promotion as well as research achievements. 2. The assessment process The College’s Athena SWAN Steering Group comprised women academics working in a range of SET disciplines and at different stages in their career progression, male Heads of Department, representatives from Human Resources (HR) and the Equality and Diversity Department and a senior administrator. The group met twice between January and April 2008 to consider a range of date and information (including headcount data for academic and research staff and postgraduate students and academic promotions data), which informed the first draft of the submission which was then approved by the Principal. A second draft then went out for broad consultation during May. The submission was also made available via the College website and promoted in the weekly E-zine. 1 A final draft of the submission was approved by the Principal’s Central Team. 3. Key findings and new actions derived as a consequence of the submission process 3.1 Information used to contextualise the data analysis Headcount data were analysed separately for Clinical Academic and NonClinical Academic staff in the Schools of Medicine, Dentistry and the IoP since these staff have different career paths. Data kept by HR on the posts held by staff members before they applied for promotion were analysed to help identify the most common career paths for academic staff at the College. This information was used to contextualise the headcount data, providing an indication of the relevant eligible pool (or the most likely group of staff to apply) for particular senior academic positions. 3.2 Percentage of women in all SET Schools by job type, 2005-2007 An overview of the proportions of women in all SET Schools by job type was considered and demonstrated that there is a decreasing proportion of women at increasing levels of seniority. 3.3 Percentage of women by School and job type, 2007 Overall in SET disciplines the proportion of women in Non-Clinical academic roles tended to decline with increasing seniority. This trend was most striking in BHS and the IoP, less so in the School of Medicine and Dental Institute. PSE deviated from this pattern as women were significantly underrepresented at all grades, whereas in the Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery (FNSNM) there were high proportions of women in all grades. Considering Clinical Academics, women were fairly well represented in the junior grades (Research and Lecturer) in all three Schools apart from Medicine. Women were less well represented in senior grades (Senior Lecturer, Reader and Professor) in all three Schools. This trend was most noticeable in the School of Medicine and least noticeable at the IoP. 3.4 Summary of promotions data for women applying to senior academic roles by School, 2005-2007 In most cases the numbers of women selected for promotion did not differ significantly from the numbers you would expect based on their representation in the eligible pool. This would suggest that the College’s promotion processes are neutral and that promotion occurs based solely on merit. In some Schools women academics were more likely to apply for promotion for senior academic roles when compared with their male counterparts, although the numbers are too small to draw firm conclusions. The overall shortfall of women being promoted to senior academic posts in SET disciplines appeared 2 to be attributed in the main to the low numbers of women present in PSE and Medicine. 3.5 Comparison of percentage of women postgraduate research students with percentage of women junior research staff by School At a College level, the percentage of women Postgraduate Research Students was compared with the percentage in Research Assistant/Associate roles (considered the entry positions to academia) to identify whether women are leaving academia in higher proportions than men at this transition point. No significant differences were found between the proportions of women in each group, suggesting women are not leaving at this point. 3.6 School specific findings Data relating to headcount, promotions and Postgraduate Research students was collated for each School to identify the issues which seemed to impact most significantly on the representation of women in the workforce in that School. Key actions are identified in bullet points. 3.6.1 School of Biomedical and Health Sciences (BHS) In BHS the key transition point where the proportion of women declines most notably is the progression from Lecturer to Senior Lecturer. However there was a positive increase in the numbers of women in Senior Lecturer roles between 2005 and 2007. If this were sustained it is likely to impact favourably on the numbers of women at Reader and Professor levels in future years. See College-wide recommendation relating to promotions. 3.6.2 Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery (FNSNM) There were high proportions of women in all academic grades within this School. A significant majority of academics in this School were at Lecturer level with historically few individuals choosing to put themselves forward for promotion. The majority of academics were qualified nurses who once they choose the academic path have few opportunities to continue to update their clinical skills. The School recently undertook two related projects to improve career progression: i) Consideration of measures to encourage more members of staff to apply for senior lectureship. ii) Consideration of how to build clinical academic pathways in nursing and midwifery. It is perceived that these projects will have positive benefits for the career progression of academics in the School. 3 3.6.3 School of Physical Sciences and Engineering (PSE) In PSE the main issue for academic staff appeared to be the low proportions of women Lecturers joining the departments, a UK trend in HEIs. The following general measures to increase female participation are being considered: Building on current Widening Participation and Marketing strategies to recruit women undergraduate students1; Encouraging women undergraduate students in this area to pursue an academic career by delivering an annual publicity campaign covering the financial support available for postgraduate study; Positive action measures to encourage women academics external to the College to apply for posts at King’s. 3.6.4 Dental Institute The percentage of women Non-Clinical Professors has been increasing gradually, although the low total number of staff in this group makes it difficult to draw any strong conclusions. On the Clinical side there had been a positive increase in the percentage of women at junior grades (Researcher and Lecturer). The dentistry profession offers Clinical Academics with primary responsibility for childcare the opportunity to qualify part-time which is a positive development. However qualification is still extremely challenging and may take longer for women who it is expected will increasingly comprise the majority of this group. See College-wide recommendation relating to mentoring. 3.6.5 School of Medicine On the Non-Clinical side the proportion of women at Lecturer level declined slightly in 2007 and it will be important to monitor this. There has been a positive improvement in the proportion of women Senior Lecturers in the last two years. It is the proportion of women at Professor level which needs further consideration. On the Clinical side, it is noteworthy that the proportion of women in senior grades (Senior Lecturer, Reader, Professor) remained low. This is a national area of concern, and a recent report by the Medical Schools Council suggests that many women struggle reconciling the lengthy and intensive qualification process with childcare responsibilities. However, at King’s the percentage of women in the junior clinical grades had increased over two years. It will be important to ensure that this growth continues and that these women progress through to the senior clinical grades. 1 This will occur in all PSE Departments bar Mathematics where a good proportion of undergraduates are women 4 Non-clinical Consideration of the routes into Non-Clinical academic roles will be undertaken, including whether there are possibilities for the high proportions of women in Non-Clinical Research roles to make this transition. See College-wide recommendation relating to promotion. Clinical Consider how better to recruit women into the senior grades and ensure they remain and progress up the career ladder Formation of an Athena SWAN subgroup in the School to consider the issues above and the clinical requirements necessary to qualify in certain medical specialisms, since the nature of these could influence their appeal to women See College-wide recommendation relating to mentoring. 3.6.6 Institute of Psychiatry (IoP) On the Non-Clinical side, the low proportion of women Professors was a notable finding. On the Clinical side there had been improvements in the proportion of women in the senior grades and it would be worth monitoring this trend. A good proportion of those who achieved promotion in this School were women which was encouraging and women were also applying for promotion in higher proportions than their representation in the eligible pool. It will be important to seek to ensure that these improvements continue and feed through to representation at senior levels. 3.7 Researchers The advancement process for Research staff is more variable, occurring in a range of contexts depending on the level of seniority. It is therefore more complex to capture and analyse the data systematically. The following actions will be taken: The College will take steps centrally to record and monitor staff applying for Senior and Principal Research Fellow positions2 by gender and include the findings in future submissions. Consideration will be given to the recording of staff who apply for Research Fellow positions at a local level. A high proportion of Research staff are on fixed term contracts, which may inhibit career progression and since women tend to be over-represented in this group, it will be valuable to analyse data on Researchers by contract type (fixed or permanent) and gender as part of the next submission. In crude terms, the career structure for Researchers at King’s is as follows: Research Assistant, Research Associate, Research Fellow, Senior Research Fellow and Principal Research Fellow 2 5 3.8 Changing the culture and gender balance in decision making Work was undertaken to examine the membership of the 11 principal governance Committees at the College. Men were considerably overrepresented in the membership of seven of these Committees. The following was agreed as a way forward in order to address the issues: More detailed work will be undertaken in order to understand the different types of membership (nominated, appointed, ex-officio etc) and the associated selection processes. Specific actions will be identified to encourage increased representation of women on Committees. Some of the options under consideration are listed in the Progress Record Form. 3.9 College-wide recommendations The following recommendations have College-wide relevance: To encourage more women academics to apply for promotion the College will consider how promotion can be more effectively integrated with appraisal, including emphasis on identifying staff potential as well as existing achievements. To research and promote to junior women academics and researchers the range of fellowships on offer via the Royal Society, Wellcome Trust and other Research Councils. To consider how data covering recruitment to academic positions can be collected and analysed routinely. To consider whether a reporting mechanism can be found to identify the length of time staff spend in certain grades. To consider offering mentoring to women academics in other Schools, once the Pilot Mentoring Scheme at the IoP has been established. 23 May 2008 6