GRL_Auxiliary_Banwell_et_al_v4

advertisement
1
Auxiliary Material
2
“Break-up of the Larsen B Ice Shelf Triggered by Chain-Reaction Drainage of
3
Supraglacial Lakes”
4
Alison F. Banwell, Douglas R. MacAyeal and Olga V. Sergienko
5
Methods
6
1. Exact analytic solution for elastic plate subject to disk-shaped load
7
We use an azimuthally symmetric solution valid for r>0 to the thin-elastic-plate flexure
8
equation (also known as the Kirchoff-Love equation, but modified to account for
9
buoyancy associated with ocean water below the thin plate) in which meltwater loads, or
10
anti-loads associated with dolines (both of uniform load area density), are confined
11
within a region r ≤ R using polar coordinates r, , and where R is the radius of the lake or
12
doline. The vertical displacement of the elastic plate, (r), for 0 ≤ r ≤ ∞, is expressed in
13
terms of Kelvin-Bessel functions (as derived by Lambeck and Nakiboglu [1980]), and is
14
displayed in MacAyeal and Sergienko [2013].
15
To illustrate the basic features of the solution, we plot in Figure S1 the vertical deflection
16
resulting from the drainage of a lake 1 m in depth and 500 m in radius, (r), radial stress,
17
Trr, and azimuthal stress, T, and the von-Mises stress (TvM), all evaluated at the upper
18
surface of the ice shelf, TvM = (Trr2 + T2 – TrrT1/2, as functions of any given distance, r,
19
from the lake center (given both in km, and expressed in units of the intrinsic flexural
20
length scale L = {D/(sw g)}1/4 ~ 923 m, where D = EH3/[12(1-2)] is the flexural rigidity,
21
sw = 1028 kg m-3 is the density of seawater, g = 9.81 m s-2 is the acceleration of gravity,
22
E = 10 GPa is Young’s modulus,  = 0.3 is the Poisson ratio, and H = 200 m is ice
23
thickness). The black line in the left panel of Figure S1 depicts the uplift associated with
24
hydrostatic rebound of the missing load [MacAyeal and Sergienko, 2013]. A photograph
25
of an uplifted doline on the George VI Ice Shelf surrounded by a down-warped moat is
26
shown in Figure 1 of MacAyeal and Sergienko [2013].
27
28
Figure S1. Analytic solution for axisymmetric (disk shaped) lake drainage-induced
29
unloading. a) Radial stress, Trr, azimuthal stress, T and vertical deflection, ,
30
introduced by drainage of a circular lake of radius 500 m and depth 1 m (note separate
31
vertical scale, in cm, for ) as evaluated at the upper surface of the ice shelf. The two
32
stress components vary linearly through the vertical dimension of the ice shelf, are zero at
33
the neutral surface (central plane of the ice shelf half way between surface and base) and
34
are equal but opposite in sign at the upper and lower surfaces of the ice shelf. Arrow and
35
dot signify location of maximum compressive stress at the surface of the ice shelf, and
36
maximum tensile stress at the base of the ice shelf, within the moat area. b) Von-Mises
37
stress, TvM, associated with the stress conditions at the surface of the ice shelf. Shaded
38
regions in both (a, b) denote the footprint of the lake.
39
2. Replacement of exact shapes of observed lakes with circular disk loads
40
Here, we justify the replacement of exact shapes of observed lakes (with equally
41
distributed loads) with circular disk loads. In Figure S2, we display the geometry of the
42
lakes and dolines observed in February 2000 (see Glasser and Scambos [2008] and
43
Banwell et al. [in press]). Comparison of the observed lakes with their circular
44
representations suggests that relatively few lakes are not well represented by circles.
45
These few lakes tend to be the larger ones that are also long and narrow, with long
46
dimensions aligned with the direction of ice flow, likely indicating the influence of a
47
suture zone within the ice-thickness field of the ice shelf.
48
To display the performance impacts of representing the lakes as circles, we use
49
COMSOL® to numerically solve the ice-shelf elastic flexure equations for an idealized
50
ice-shelf domain that is rectangular in which we arbitrarily place a given lake (or its
51
circular representation) in the center. The resulting solutions for displacement, , and
52
von-Mises stress, TvM, under the assumptions of either the observed lake geometry or
53
circular lake geometry are shown in Figures S3 and S4. Figure S3 depicts the
54
comparison between results of the exact observed geometry with the results of the
55
circular representation for a typical lake. We regard the comparison to be sufficiently
56
similar as to affirm our decision to simplify the lakes on the LBIS as circles so that the
57
analytic solution could be used. For comparison, and to motivate future investigation, we
58
show a worst-case performance of the circular representation of an observed lake that is
59
long and narrow in Figure S4. Despite the relatively poor comparison of the two
60
solutions in Figure S4, the relative rarity of large, long lakes on the LBIS motivated our
61
decision to stick with circular lake representations.
62
A comparison of the numerical and the exact analytic solutions for a circular lake is
63
provided in MacAyeal and Sergienko [2013].
64
65
Figure S2. Observed lakes (as observed in February 2000, see Glasser and Scambos
66
[2008]) and their representation using circles of equal area. a) 2758 lakes and dolines on
67
the LBIS. b) Representation of the lakes in a by circles. c) Close-up of lakes represented
68
as circles in region outlined by box in (b). d) Close-up of lakes and dolines in region
69
outlined by box in (a).
70
71
Figure S3. Numerical demonstration of the effect of representing arbitrary lake shapes
72
as circles—a typical lake showing acceptable performance of the circular representation.
73
a) The deflection, , for a typical lake on the LBIS assuming a uniform lake depth of 5
74
m. b) The von-Mises stress, TvM, evaluated at the ice-shelf surface associated with the
75
solution shown in (a). c) As in (b), but for a circular representation of the lake. d) As in
76
(a), but for a circular representation of the lake. Gray shading indicates the footprint of
77
the lake or circular representation of the lake. Color bar for (a) also applies to (d), color
78
bar for (b) also applies to (c). Only areas where TvM >70 kPa, are colored in panels (b, c).
79
80
Figure S4. Numerical demonstration of the effect of representing arbitrary lake shapes as
81
circles—an atypical lake showing worst-case performance of the circular representation.
82
a) The deflection, , for an atypical lake (long and narrow) on the LBIS assuming a
83
uniform lake depth of 5 m. b) The von-Mises stress, TvM, evaluated at the ice shelf
84
surface associated with the solution shown in (a). c) As in (b), but for a circular
85
representation of the lake. d) As in (a), but for a circular representation of the lake. Grey
86
shading indicates the footprint of the lake or circular representation of the lake. Color bar
87
for (a) also applies to (d). Color bar for (b) also applies to (c). Only areas where TvM >70
88
kPa, are colored in panels (b, c).
Download