ENGL 1102 Spring 2009 Final Web Project & Portfolio (35%) Peer Review 1 (Written Content): Friday, April 10th Peer Review 2 (Web Material): Wednesday, April 22nd Final Version Due: By 5:00PM on the scheduled exam day (P3=April 29th; E1=April 28th; M=April 29th) Task For the final project, students will need to create an interactive website that does two things: 1) the site as a whole should function as a portfolio for their writing throughout the semester (i.e. a main page, introduction, menu, links to respective sections of the portfolio, conclusion section, etc). 2) the site will also need to include the final research project on zombies in popular media. The research project must focus on a particular theme or themes (i.e. gender, technology, reproduction, etc.) in 2-3 different zombie narratives. Students are free to choose any texts they wish (film, novel, graphic novel, etc.) to analyze. One text must be from the course reading or film list; additional texts may be chosen from outside with prior approval. The project should develop a clear argument, establish connections across the texts (i.e. comparison and/or contrast), present close readings of key scenes or examples to support ideas, and integrate theoretical ideas from at least five scholarly sources to help develop the author’s claims. NOTE: Students may not choose a film that they have already written or presented on. Requirements The Portfolio The web portfolio and all its content must be uploaded and hosted on the IRON server under the student’s account (see the wiki’s Resources section for details on uploading to the server) Students should use an HTML editing program (like Dreamweaver) to design their portfolio The main index page of the site should have: 1) a title, 2) the student’s name and section number; 3) a brief welcome/introduction paragraph explaining the contents of the portfolio; 4) a menu with links to your work throughout the semester—this MUST include: a) your film poster; b) your group poster; c) your scene analysis web project; and d) the final project The Final Project The project must develop an analytical argument about the 2-3 chosen zombie texts that is supported with persuasive scene analyses and relevant scholarly sources. Therefore, the project needs to make connections between the primary texts by examining them in relation to each other, not separately. The project must have a specific title that reflects the focus of the analyses The project must include pertinent images, especially to support any scene analyses. I expect to see screenshots and/or embedded video clips of the sequence(s) discussed (Note: All images or videos appropriate from the web must be cited in the Works Cited section using MLA format) The project must have the following sections: 1) introduction (provides an appropriate opening hook, situates the film, the thematic focus, and articulates the thesis) 2) separate topic or thematic sections (these should have their own subtitles/headings and contain the bulk of the project’s written content, including scene analyses from the texts) 3) a conclusion (ties together the different sections, reiterates their significance to the narratives and the overall argument, etc.) 4) a Works Cited (ALL cited materials must be indexed here using MLA style) The written content of the project should total between 2000-2500 words (approximately 8-10 pages double spaced). On a technical level, the project must: o Incorporate relevant, function hyperlinks o Demonstrate ability to modify background color or wallpaper imagery o Set the title of the project and sub-headings apart from the other written content by use of distinctive font size, color, and/or style o The font should be legible throughout the site—please use 14pt font or larger for chunks of written text o Use single-spaced block paragraphs and demarcate paragraph breaks with a paragraph or double line break o Use formal language and avoid use of the personal pronoun o Use present tense when discussing the film and specific scenes Submission Students must submit the URL (under the “Add URL” tab) in their individual dropbox folder on T-Square by 5:00PM on their section exam date Students must also turn in hard copy printouts of their peer reviews on the last day of class (Note: It is recommended that students also submit electronic copies to the dropbox as backups) Suggestions and Tips Preparation Students should keep their written content in Word documents so that it is easy to edit and track changes (Note: Students should wait to upload their written content to the web site until they have completed all peer reviews and revisions) Students should test out well in advance all links, videos, and images to their site before submitting the URL to dropbox Students should test their website out on several different browsers to ensure consistency (Note: I will be viewing projects in either Mozilla or Safari) Students can consult with me in advance if they have questions about the project or would like me to look over drafted sections (Note: This must be done via appointment, not over email) Students are encouraged to use their peers as resources, especially if they need help with HTML editing; alternatively, students can often receive assistance from help desk personnel in the Multimedia Suite of the library Grading and Assessment Students will receive a percentage out of 100 for their grade on this assignment. For the portfolio (10%) I will be assessing: 1) how well it meets the assignment criteria for formatting, content, etc. 2) the clarity and effectiveness of the welcome/introduction paragraph 3) functionality of links and ease of navigation throughout the portfolio 3) style and creativity of design For the final project (25%) I will be assessing: 1) clarity, cohesiveness, and persuasiveness of overall argument 2) the quality and sophistication of textual analysis and scholarly support for the argument throughout the project 3) overall organization of the project and the written content 4) design creativity, professionalism, and appropriateness 5) grammar, spelling, and MLA citation accuracy Additionally, I will also be taking into consideration the Writing and Communications Program rubric when assessing projects (See chart on following page). Table 1. Objectives and Outcomes Specified by the Board of Regents and by Communication@Tech Board of Regents University System of Georgia* Georgia Tech Writing and Communication Program Rhetoric Rhetoric focuses on available means of persuasion, considering the synergy of factors such as context, audience, purpose, role, argument, organization, design, visuals, and conventions of language. Objective “Understand rhetorical contexts for writing by establishing the writer’s role, the audience, and the purpose of the project.” Outcome “Use conventions of writing mechanics, usage, and style to communicate effectively for the given audience, purpose, and format.” Objectives Understand registers and variations within discourses. Process Processes for communication — for example, creating, planning, drafting, designing, rehearsing, revising, presenting, publishing—are recursive, not linear. Learning productive processes is as important as creating products. Objective “Approach writing as a way to think and communicate ideas to others.” Outcomes “Use recursive processes that include collecting information, focusing, ordering, drafting, revising, and editing.” Objective Explore individual and collaborative processes in multicultural and international contexts. Outcome Create artifacts that demonstrate the synergy of rhetorical elements. Apply strategies for addressing academic and professional audiences. Outcome Construct, select, and deploy information based on interpretation and critique of the accuracy, bias, credibility, authority, and appropriateness of sources. “Demonstrate the techniques and skills of research, integration of source material, and documentation.” Quoted text derives from the “Committee on English Recommendation,” Board of Regents for the University System of Georgia, http://www.usg.edu/academics/comm/english/level_11012.phtml (accessed July 31, 2008). * Modes and Media Activities and assignments should use a variety of modes and media— written, oral, visual, electronic, and nonverbal—singly and in combination. The context and culture of multimodality and multimedia are critical. Objective “Adjust writing to a variety of contexts, including electronic environments.” Outcome “Read and respond to various texts for purposes of interpretation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and judgment.” Objective Distinguish and evaluate multimodal communication — WOVEN (Written, Oral, Visual, Electronic, and Nonverbal). Outcome Create WOVEN artifacts that demonstrate interpretation, analysis, synthesis, evaluation, and judgment.