NYISO/NYSRC REPORT June 2014 Rich Bolbrock – NYISO Advisor The following are highlights of recent NYISO and NYSRC activities: . Uplift/OATT Schedule 1 Charges Uplift for May (not including NYISO cost of operations) is $0.07/MWh, higher than the ($0.09/MWh for April. The Local Reliability Share is $0.51/MWh, up from $0.15/MWh in April, while the Statewide Share is ($0.44)/MWh, lower than the ($0.24)/MWh in April. The average year-to-date monthly LBMP of $108.12/MWh is a 65% increase from $65.46/MWh in May 2013. Natural gas prices (Transco Zone 6 NY) dropped in May, down 16% from $4.12/MMBtu the previous month. Oil prices dropped slightly in May. The May peak load was 23,198 Mw and occurred on the 27th. This compares to the all-time summer capability period peak load of 33,956 Mw that was set on July 19th of last year. NYISO Issues POWER TRENDS 2014 (Evolution of the Grid) The NYISO produces this annual report to provide stakeholders with data and analysis of the major factors affecting the New York electric industry. [Think of it as a ‘State of the Grid’ report.] Changing Patterns of Demand for Electricity – NYISO indicates that combinations of factors (the economy, extreme weather events, and emerging energy technologies) are changing the historical patterns of electricity demand. This change has significant implications for system planning, operations, wholesale electricity markets, and demand-side management programs. Electric load growth has been reduced with energy efficiency initiatives as well as “behind the meter” distributed generation such as customer-sited solar photovoltaic systems. One negative change is that peak demand is growing faster than average energy demand. From 2014 through 2024 New York peak demand is forecast to grow at an annual rate of 0.83 percent while energy use is forecast to grow at an annual rate of 0.16 percent. [This trend in load factor suggests that peak load reduction initiatives will need to be considered.] What Extreme Conditions Tell Us About the Grid – New York set new seasonal peaks within a six month period and suffered a major hurricane in October 2012. The July 19, 2013 new all time summer peak coupled with a weeklong heat wave reinforced the need to address transmission congestion issues. [Interestingly, for our member systems the solutions to relieving congestion can be a two-edged sword – potentially lowering energy costs while raising capacity costs.] The NYISO concludes that this situation reinforces the need for the Energy Highway projects to be implemented. The January 7, 2014 new all time winter peak focused attention on the need to address various gas/electric coordination issues given the increased reliance on natural gas as the fuel of choice. Although there were no outages due to fuel shortages during the winter, exceptionally high natural gas prices resulted in spikes in wholesale electricity prices. [These price spikes proved to be a significant burden to our member systems.] The value of fuel diversity and dual-fuel capability was demonstrated. In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, the potential of distributed energy resources to enhance the resilience of the electric system was recognized and the Governor announced a $40M initiative to develop community-based “micro grids”. [The potential impact of micro grids and large scale distributed-energy resources is not well understood but is likely complex in nature.] Sustaining and Enhancing Power Resources – NYISO notes that New York’s installed reserve margins remain positive but have been declining. [My view is that this decline is a natural event given the relatively large excesses in recent years. It seems to me that for better or worse, the market is functioning as intended in this regard.] The NYISO planning process is still a work in progress. The NYISO is expanding its risk assessment analyses to include scenarios (such as a “90/10” load forecast) to account for extreme weather conditions. In order to take full advantage of New York’s fuel diversity (most of the renewable and hydro resources are located in the west and north vs. the southeast with mostly gas-fired plants), the NYISO states that upgrades and enhancements are needed to the transmission system including the Transmission Owners TRANSCO projects and the Governor’s Energy Highway Initiative. These changes to the transmission system will enable energy to be moved from the upstate regions to the Hudson Valley and New York City/Long Island regions. [This will likely raise costs for our member systems.] The addition of significant amounts of distributed energy resources poses a variety of operational challenges for NYISO. Over the past two years more than 300 Mw of solar resources have been installed or are under development according to the NY–Sun Initiative with a goal of installing 3,000 Mw of solar capacity by 2023. In April of this year the New York Public Service Commission initiated a Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) proceeding with the ultimate goal of putting in place a mechanism for the management and coordination of distributed energy resources on a large scale. Maximizing Resources and Regional Collaboration - As reported in this column on numerous occasions, the Broader Regional Market Initiative has been actively pursued by NYISO and neighboring ISOs and has begun to realize economic and reliability benefits. In addition, the Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative (EIPIC) is currently studying the region’s natural gas infrastructure and its ability to provide for the increasing use of natural gas generation. Markets and Grid Evolution – NYISO correctly notes that wholesale electricity market structures are in a continual state of flux due to changes in technology, economic conditions, and public policy. They cite the “Draft 2014 New York State Energy Plan” which states that New York’s wholesale electricity market provides incentives “to locate generation, transmission and demand response resources where they are most needed” and the value of markets in “putting the risk of those investments on investors rather than on ratepayers”. [I generally disagree with the first citation and strongly disagree with the second – but that is a discussion for another time!] Odds and Ends Market-to-Market Coordination (PJM) – In May the Broader Regional Market Coordination protocol produced a cost savings to New York of $0.15M (compared to $0.30M in April) with a year-to-date value of $6.11M. Joint NYISO Board/Management Committee Meeting – The annual meeting utilized a new format (previously a “panel session” format was used) of “round table” discussions. Three topics were discussed: 1. Gas/Electric Coordination, 2. Capacity Market Evolution, and 3. Distributed Energy Resources. [The subject of a Forward Capacity Market was raised but fortunately there was a strong negative reaction by many stakeholders.] -2- New Capacity Zone (NCZ) Litigation – As reported last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard arguments in early June regarding whether it should stop the implementation of the NCZ in the Lower Hudson Valley. Separate petitions have been brought by Central Hudson and the New York PSC. The concern is that the NCZ will cause significant price spikes and that the various projects being proposed as part of the Energy Highway and other initiatives eliminates the need for the new zone. The Court subsequently has rejected the request for a delay in implementation. [It is not clear what further action, if any, the parties will take, but my belief is that the NCZ saga will continue.] As always, please convey any questions or comments that you may have on the above or any other issues related to the NYISO or NYSRC to me through the MEUA office. -3-