What are learning outcomes? A guide to their use in teaching and assessment 2000 Notes for Staff Development Faculty of Continuing Education Notes for Staff Development Faculty of Continuing Education What are learning outcomes? Section 1 What are learning outcomes? Learning outcomes are the intended or unintended development of skills and/or personal attributes acquisition of knowledge deepening of understanding that result from engaging in a learning event such as a course, a day school, or an independent learning project. Learning outcomes are statements of what it is that students will or should be able to do as a result of engaging in a learning activity. They need to be able to be assessed, and therefore there should not be too many. Some people believe that each class in a course should have a set of learning outcomes. That is perfectly possible. An example from an Introduction to Sociology course might be a class that is looking at how people conform to social norms and share common belief systems: By the end of this class, participants will be able to use the concept of socialisation to explain how children learn to conform recognise different agencies of socialisation explain why some people do not conform to social norms define the concept of ideology identify the variety of ways in which ideologies become dominant recognise the existence of strategies for resisting dominant ideologies construct a clear and cogent argument that explains the existence of hegemony. There are two problems with this. First, if you are to utilise learning outcomes at this level, they will need not only to be assessable but also to be assessed. There is no point in making claims as to what participants will be able to do, if they are not to be tested. This means that a significant amount of time at the end of the class, or through homework, will have to be given over to assessing these outcomes. Second, this is only one week out of, say, 24. If you multiply the number of learning outcomes by 24, then the course will have a huge number of learning outcomes that will need to be assessed. Again, whilst this is possible, it may be very daunting and take up a disproportionate amount of time. On the other hand it is perfectly possible to produce a list of learning outcomes to be achieved by the end of the course. So, for the example of Introduction to Sociology: Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 3 What are learning outcomes? By the end of the course, participants will be able to identify at least two different sociological perspectives apply a sociological perspective to explain how social order is possible explain why social deviance occurs construct a sociological explanation that accounts for individual differences compare the relative significance of the family and education as agencies of socialisation. Learning outcomes may be used in any kind of learning event, including those shorter than a course, including a day school or a half-day workshop. Here is an example for a day school. The meaning of food: a social psychological perspective Day school (7 hours) Aim To provide an introduction to the social psychology of food choice Objectives Examine different levels of analysis in the study of food and eating Enhance understanding of different contributions to food preferences Consider links between social psychological concepts and food choice Consider individual differences in eating behaviour Learning outcomes By the end of this day school you will be able to: discriminate between different levels of analysis of food and eating from biology to culture describe and comment on the way individual, social and cultural factors contribute to food choice recognise links between social psychological concepts (such as the influence of group membership and persuasion techniques) and food choice identify the causes of individual differences in eating behaviour. By emphasising what learners should be able to do by the end of the learning activity, the consequences are more tangible and observable than those ideas related to educational aims and objectives. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 4 What are learning outcomes? An aim for any particular educational, training or other kinds of learning activities will: specify the overall purpose be expressed in general rather than specific terms cover breadth and depth cover the whole of the learning event or activity be aspirational or what the learning event intends to achieve There is not a consensus about what constitutes an aim, nor whether a learning event or activity can have more than one aim. However, for the purpose of standardisation, let us work with the assumption that any learning event or activity should be characterised by a single aim that has the above characteristics. On the other hand objectives may be multiple. If the aim provides the overall strategy, purpose, mission or vision of a learning programme, event or activity, then the objectives outline the ways in which that strategy will be delivered, the tasks to be done, the activities to be engaged in if the aim is to be met. Objectives specify action to be taken represent achievable steeping stones to meeting the overall aim are detailed Every stated objective should be a contribution to the achievement of the aim. Collectively, the set of objectives should be comprehensive and capable of delivering the aim. Examples Applying these principles to this learning pack on aims, objectives and learning outcomes, we might specify: Aim To enable participants to distinguish and write aims, objectives and learning outcomes that will assist in teaching and assessment. Objectives Understand the importance of the distinction between aims, objectives and learning outcomes Recognise the difference between aims, objectives and learning outcomes Write aims, objectives and learning outcomes Ensure that learning outcomes can be assessed. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 5 What are learning outcomes? Note Again there is a difference of opinion on this, but typically an aim should being with 'To ....' and objectives begin with an active verb that will guide action such as 'Recognise'. 'Differentiate', 'Identify', 'Analyse', 'Describe', 'Demonstrate', 'Explain', 'Agree', 'Compare' and so on. Learning outcomes will be prefaced; 'By the end of the course (day)(class)(workshop)(etc) participants will be able to ....'. Let's apply that to something more concrete. Here is an example taken from a Faculty of Continuing Education psychology course: Psychology at Work Aim To examine the ways in which psychological theories and principles can be applied to working in organisations and to the world of work generally. Objectives Identify and critically discuss current issues in personnel selection and assessment, motivation, job satisfaction, organisations, ergonomics, training and development, health and safety. Support and develop study skills, including note taking and essay writing Promote students' confidence in presenting their own ideas and in critical thinking Provide equal opportunities to all students irrespective of race, gender, class, sexual orientation, religion, disability, age or political beliefs What do you think of this aim and set of objectives? Here are some observations: Coherence of the aim and objectives The aim is succinct and appropriately expressed; it conveys the purpose of the course on offer. It does not specify the curriculum content, this is the function of the objectives that set down the broad headings for the curriculum content. It is important that the objectives are consistent with the aim, of course. The aim and objectives are specified for pedagogical purposes, to help determine the course content. Marketing Sometimes it is assumed that either separately or together aims and objectives can be used to market a course or learning event. This is not its main purpose, Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 6 What are learning outcomes? although marketing information must be consistent with the specified aim, objectives and learning outcomes. Scope If an aim cannot be expressed simply in terms of a single statement then this is an indicator that the course or learning event may be being too ambitious, and could benefit from being re-structured into more than one event. Getting the aim, objectives and learning outcomes right are useful for ensuring that there is enough time to meet the aim, deliver the objectives and achieve the outcomes. If you have had that common experience of not having the time, or having to rush to cover the pre-specified content, then you need to revisit and revise your aim and objectives. Key skills The objectives in the example are not all about content. Some are to do with personal attributes (building confidence) and what are currently known as key skills (study skills and critical thinking, and we could add communication skills, such as making a successful presentation, or IT skills, if relevant). This is important. The aim does not necessarily indicate that as well as gaining knowledge and deepening understanding about psychological theories and principles, participants will develop skills such as critical thinking and note-taking. However, these must be reflected in the learning outcomes; they must form part of the assessment of learning outcomes if they are in the objectives. Equal opportunities The objectives also contain something else – the commitment to equal opportunities. Whilst this is extremely important, and should be highly commended, there needs to be a word of caution here. There is a difference between saying that the learning event will be an equal opportunities experience, to saying that it will focus on raising awareness of equal opportunities. All courses and learning activities should provide equal opportunities, and whether they do or not should be identified through course evaluation procedures, not assessment. However, some courses and learning will include objectives that relate to raising awareness of, and providing strategies for handling, equal opportunity issues. In such cases, this must also be reflected in learning outcomes and in the assessment strategy. We will see how that works shortly. Evaluating aims and objectives It is important for the specification of aims and objectives to be critically scrutinised. This is the responsibility of the tutor writing them. They are the foundation for the quality of the learning experience, upon which all else rests. There is little point in investing time in specifying learning outcomes and appropriate assessment criteria unless these are right in the first place. Having said that, of course, it is an iterative process, and that the evaluation of aims and Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 7 What are learning outcomes? objectives rests in the ability to derive a set of comprehensive and measurable learning outcomes that ensures that the learning event is feasible and realistic. Let's have a practice at critical scrutiny. Here is another example taken from a psychology syllabus. Getting Closer – the Dynamics of Relationship A one day course Getting closer requires an understanding of one's own need for independence and freedom. Otherwise the relationship breaks down into continual bickering over who puts the rubbish out or pays the 'phone bill. But the underlying argument is the same: it is always about who cares the most. The 'carer' is defined as the 'closeness seeker' and therefore the other becomes the 'freedom seeker'. From this point all communication (intimate, mundane, sexual) is biased to reinforce this 'I versus We' conflict. Breaking this cycle of disillusionment and overcoming emotional pain involves analysing childhood attachment patterns that set the dice rolling in the first place, as well as social scripting that promotes 'masculinity' and 'femininity' and the history of disappointments and failures in past relationships. This course is about how to maintain a positive stance towards the relationship future by changing emotional attitudes. Healthier patterns of communication both verbal and non-verbal are discussed. We shall also explore the concepts of speech style and love style. Although the course is designed for opposite sex couples, it is just as applicable to all dyads, homosexual, parent/child, friendships, colleagues. All are welcome. What is the aim of this one-day course? Are the objectives clear? What do you think the learning outcomes would be? That example is so far from the ideal type that it should have been relatively easy to criticise. Now have a go at this one. Creative Imaging Accredited course Aims The course aims: To introduce participants to the experience of visualisation in a variety of contexts so they may increase their potential and their effectiveness in their personal and working lives; To increase awareness of the differences between the right and the left cerebral hemisphere and how they may be integrated for optimum effectiveness. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 8 What are learning outcomes? Objectives At the end of the course people will be able to use imaging to: relax deeply and relieve stress explore problems and issues and help themselves to bring 'hunches' to consciousness through the use of images as metaphors explore possible futures to enable better decision making and choices in the present explore issues and conflicts concerning their concepts and feelings regarding: time, money , relationships and health explore their sub personalities through contacting the inner male and female and the inner child improve a skills and/or prepare for change improve relationships access their deeper wisdom and self knowledge. Is the aim of the course clear and coherent? Any comments on the objectives listed? What are the learning outcomes? This example is a little more challenging. You will observe that the course has two aims. It was indicated earlier that ideally a course should only have one aim, and if there is a need for two then perhaps the course is trying to cover too much ground in the time available. What do you think? Could you find a way of merging the course aims into a single aim? The objectives are problematic because they are led by the phrase 'At the end of the course people will be able to use imaging to: ....'. On the surface this might look as though they are not objectives but learning outcomes. Can they be treated as learning outcomes? Some of them would be very difficult to assess. In fact, the way it is expressed suggests that there is only one learning outcome: by the end of the course people will be able to use imaging in a variety of ways. The list of things to be explored could well constitute the course content, and therefore are probably intended to be learning objectives. So we would need to not only revise the course aim, but also need to disentangle the objectives from the learning outcomes. Learning outcomes are indicators that learning has taken place that can be attributed to the participation in the learning event or activities. In other words, learning outcomes are a sign that the course we have provided has been successful for those who participate. As such they are also useful evidence for accountability – providing data on the quality of our teaching programmes. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 9 What are learning outcomes? Section 2 Why learning outcomes? Having introduced what learning outcomes are, and how they fit with course aims, objectives and assessment strategies, we should spend a little time thinking about why learning outcomes? Learning outcomes inform participants what they can expect to get from registering on a course, learning event or through engaging in a learning activity ensure learning is more relevant to the needs of learners confirm to learners that they have been successful as a result of being on a course, learning event or through engaging in a learning activity build learners' confidence provide documentary evidence of their achievement help to identify areas in need of further development support a flexible, student-centred approach to learning, including project work enable the process assessment and accreditation of prior learning identify intended as well as intended consequences of teaching and learning assist tutors in designing their course and developing materials for supporting and assessing learning clarify expectations and demystify the learning process ensure appropriate assessment strategies are used help set assessment tasks (exam questions, essay titles, multiple choice statements, etc) help tutors to choose an appropriate teaching strategy as some learning outcomes are more appropriately delivered through some teaching methods or ways of learning than others provide clear information as to the level of a course or learning event give feedback to tutors on the effectiveness of their teaching contribute to lifelong learning blur the barriers between learning providers and the outside world (work, home, communities) give institutions and external funding bodies and sponsors evidence of successful teaching and learning. The key principles behind the learning outcomes approach: Curriculum The learning outcomes approach to curriculum bases programme and curriculum design, content, delivery and assessment on an identification of knowledge, Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 10 What are learning outcomes? understanding, skills (and abilities), attitudes and values needed by both learners and their societies: Learning outcomes , based on an analysis of learner and societal needs, should be the basis for curriculum and pedagogic strategies Pedagogy The learning outcomes approach to pedagogy emphasises clarity of instruction, goals, explicit identification of knowledge, understanding, skills and abilities that learners should acquire, and the use of ongoing, integrated, authentic assessment strategies. Learning outcomes should enable tutors and learners to have a clear understanding of the goals of the curriculum Learning outcomes A learning outcome statement expresses the essential and enduring knowledge, the depth of understanding, the range of abilities and skills, as well as the attitudes, values and dispositions that constitute the integrated learning needed by a learner to successfully complete a course or learning event. Learning outcomes should clearly relate to the use learners will make of their learning beyond the classroom or learning setting Learning outcomes should express the essential and integrated abilities of the successful learner rather than discrete elements of knowledge or skills Learning outcomes should express not only the specific outcomes of a learning, training or educational programme, but also the general or generic outcomes. Programme level outcomes should always include relevant general key skill outcomes such as critical thinking and effective communication Learning outcomes should be developed and articulated at the institutional level, as well as at programme level and course level, or even class or workshop level. Assessment Learning outcomes are educational or instructional goals and should be measurable and assessed, but outcomes should not be limited by the assessment process. Learning outcomes should assessed in an 'authentic' manner that tests learners' ability to self assess, integrate and apply to their learning Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 11 What are learning outcomes? Assessment should be seen as playing a crucial function in learning by providing a means for learners to practice integrative application of their learning and receive useful feedback Implementation Learning outcomes should be identified and implemented by tutors in consultation with learners as well as programme managers, and other appropriate advisory groups. Learning outcomes should emerge from a negotiation between learners, tutors and others, as appropriate Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 12 What are learning outcomes? Section 3 How do you write learning outcomes? We have already looked at some examples of learning outcomes. They need to specify things that learners will be able to do, know, believe, feel or understand at the end of any learning activity. These are intended outcomes. They may also be unplanned – what learners can do, know, believe, feel or understand following engagement with a set of learning activities that were not planned as part of the course or learning event. The specification of unplanned learning outcomes by definition cannot be written in advance, but learners or their tutors will need to be able to formulate a statement at the end of their learning programme that captures this change that has taken place as a result of engaging with the learning. Writing learning outcomes in advance can take a variety of forms and involve a number of procedures. They might be written by the course tutor who is to deliver and assess the learning; they might be written by a programme designer or course manager who then appoints a tutor to deliver and assess them; or the writing may be the result of a negotiation between the programme manager, the student and the tutor. Whichever strategy is adopted, the end product must be in the form of a simple, coherent, clear and measurable statement. There may be one or many. But they must derive from, and be consistent with, the aim and objectives. As indicated earlier, this may in practice prove to be a consultative and iterative process. Here is a suggested approach to the task: Think what you as a tutor might expect learners to be able to do and/or know and/or understand as a result of participating in your course or learning activity. Check with other colleagues, including the programme manager, that this is a realistic and feasible expectation Where possible, test these out with actual or potential learners, those you have identified as target groups of learners, and get their feedback Consider what you will have covered in your course or learning activity. What should those participating be able to do as a result of that programme? Now write those ideas out, using active verbs where possible. The verb used will not only indicate the nature of the learning outcome, but the level at which they are intended to demonstrate the achievement of the learning. For example, the requirement to list the factors that contribute to psychological well-being, is of a lower order, than the determination of the relative significance of those factors. At the end of this section is a list of Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 13 What are learning outcomes? typical active verbs, grouped by particular types of intended outcomes. This is the basis of a vocabulary for writing learning outcomes. Now write them out Check them to ensure they are consistent with your aim and objectives, and that they are likely to be measurable Are there too few or too many? Will you need to spend a disproportionate amount of time engaged in assessment? Can some of them be collapsed together to make fewer, broader, less specific outcomes? Examine the range – do they cover key skills as well as content, and at the appropriate level? Now check with colleagues and/or potential students that they clearly know what would be expected of them if they were to do this programme. Then find out if they think this is reasonable set of learning outcomes that would satisfy students coming on the programme. Re-adjust as necessary. Remember to always begin your list with a phrase such as 'By the end of this course students will be able to ..... ' Practice Drawing on a previous example, consider what kind of learning outcomes can be written. In the box below add in some learning outcomes that derive from the aim and objectives. Psychology at Work Aim To examine the ways in which psychological theories and principles can be applied to working in organisations and to the world of work generally. Objectives Identify and critically discuss current issues in personnel selection and assessment, motivation, job satisfaction, organisations, ergonomics, training and development, health and safety. Support and develop study skills, including note taking and essay writing Promote students' confidence in presenting their own ideas and in critical thinking Provide equal opportunities to all students irrespective of race, gender, class, sexual orientation, religion, disability, age or political beliefs Learning outcomes Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 14 What are learning outcomes? How did you get on? Did you remember to begin with 'By the end of this course, students will be able to ..... ' Here are some suggestions: Learning outcomes By the end of this course, you will be able to Distinguish at least three psychological theories that you can apply to your own work context Critically analyse a successful personnel selection interview using psychological theory to understand why it was a success Use your knowledge of individual differences and cultural diversity to analyse why some colleagues appear to be more motivated and committed than others to their work Argue the importance of initiatives such as Investors in People Present your ideas and arguments in a clear, coherent and structured way You may well have come up with a different set. That's fine, and alerts us to the argument for ensuring that the tutor (and where possible in negotiation with the actual students) should be responsible for writing the learning outcomes. In the example above, the course tutor or students may not have wanted to talk about, say, Investors in People as part of the learning. If it is specified as a learning outcome they would have to; otherwise, the learning outcome may not be assessable. There is no magic formula for writing learning outcomes. Nor is it a difficult or mysterious process. Some people may recall when writing aims and objectives was a challenge, and now, after some practice, it is a routine activity they go through in the production of their course outline or syllabus. With practice, this will be equally true of writing learning outcomes. Have a go at writing your own. And if you are not sure, show them to a colleague or your programme manager for confirmation that they are appropriate. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 15 What are learning outcomes? List of verbs for use in writing learning outcomes For Knowledge arrange order define recognise duplicate label recall list repeat memorise name state relate reproduce ** For Comprehension classify locate describe recognise discuss report explain restate express review identify select indicate translate ** For Application apply operate choose schedule dramatise illustrate use practice demonstrate sketch employ solve interpret write ** For Analysis analyse differentiate appraise discriminate calculate distinguish categorise examine compare experiment contrast question criticise test ** For Synthesis arrange formulate assemble manage collect organise compose plan construct prepare create propose design write ** For Evaluation appraise judge argue predict assess rate attach score choose select compare support estimate evaluate ** Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 16 What are learning outcomes? Section 4 How do you assess learning outcomes? In many ways writing learning outcomes is the easy part of their use. Identifying assessment criteria and designing assessment strategies based on learning outcomes is more challenging. It may not always be necessary to assess each and every learning outcome in every kind of learning event. For example, in the case of a half – or full-day workshop, to spend time engaged in assessment of learning may feel to be disproportionate to the total amount of time available for learning. If the programme is not accredited, then more informal checks on learning can be made, which may, for example, use self-assessment. The concluding comments to the day might include something like: ‘On your way home this evening reflect back on the learning outcomes that were set for the day, and consider how far you think those outcomes have been achieved’. More formally, such statements could be tied in with the evaluation of the day. So the participants might be asked either verbally on through a questionnaire: ‘The learning outcomes specified for today were a, b, c and d. How far have each of these been achieved, do you think?’ In linking learning outcomes to assessment of learning, we need to suspend our preconceptions about what are good assessment practices. Many automatically turn to conventional assessment tools without really asking why, say, examinations or essays. Their reliability and validity is, it is assumed, well tried and tested, and there is little point in innovating new assessment techniques for the sake of it. Taken to its extreme, it is possible to identify programmes of learning that are driven by the assessment strategy. Unseen examination papers, for example, often need to be produced and agreed with an external examiner months before a course is due to finish. The tutor has to determine what the issues are still to be raised, and quite often the curriculum content is thereafter decided in the knowledge of what questions have been asked on the examination paper. There is always the danger of the tail wagging the dog. As Battersby (1997) comments: If we really wish to achieve complex but worthy educational outcomes, we should make sure that our assessment tools not only do not pervert the process, but actually enhance it. Given that one of the main advantages of moving to outcomes is to enable us to realise curriculum-wide goals and Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 17 What are learning outcomes? disciplinary integration, we must be sure that our assessment instruments really measure whether we are attaining these goals. The notion of 'authentic' assessment has already been mentioned. Battersby uses the term to refer to the necessity of creating assessment tools that 'really test whether students have developed the intended skills and understanding' which should be integrated in the 'use of their knowledge outside of school'. Far from stifling creativity, learning outcomes stimulate it, especially in designing and innovating new ways of undertaking authentic assessment. The determination of the assessment strategy is a derivative process. The flow of decision-making flows from the agreed purpose or course aims. As already implied, this is an iterative process, and does not mean that those aims may be subject to change by considerations of the assessment strategy, but it they are the starting point. In formulating learning outcomes it has been argued that they must be measurable and their assessment feasible. Moreover, and perhaps more obviously, they must be coherent. There is no value in assessing knowledge, skills nor understanding that are not identified through learning outcomes. To go back to the unseen examination as an example. If one of the learning outcomes stresses the ability to work to tight deadlines and under pressure, then one way of testing that might be to use unseen timed examinations to measure learners' ability to respond to pressure. However, we would need to bear in mind that the ability to do examinations also tests other skills, knowledge and attributes such as memory. Unless our learning outcomes also include the ability to store and recall information from memory then there might be more appropriate ways of testing the ability to work under pressure. It could be that learning outcomes are amended to include this aspect to be learned, but it would need to be accompanied with a change in the course content, to build time into the course for learners to find out how to do examinations and to practice the skills needed. To illustrate these points about assessment let us go back to our example. Psychology at Work Aim To examine the ways in which psychological theories and principles can be applied to working in organisations and to the world of work generally. Objectives Identify and critically discuss current issues in personnel selection and assessment, motivation, job satisfaction, organisations, ergonomics, training and development, health and safety. Support and develop study skills, including note taking and essay writing Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 18 What are learning outcomes? Promote students' confidence in presenting their own ideas and in critical thinking Provide equal opportunities to all students irrespective of race, gender, class, sexual orientation, religion, disability, age or political beliefs Learning outcomes By the end of this course, you will be able to Distinguish at least three psychological theories that you can apply to your own work context Critically analyse a successful personnel selection interview using psychological theory to understand why it was a success Use your knowledge of individual differences and cultural diversity to analyse why some colleagues appear to be more motivated and committed than others to their work Argue the importance of initiatives such as Investors in People Present your ideas and arguments in a clear, coherent and structured way Write down the assessment strategy would you use and why? Bear in mind an assessment strategy could be made up of one or more assessment tools, methods or instruments such as essays, examinations, projects, presentations, multiple choice tests, and so on. In real circumstances you might also need to consider level and the currency of credits if the learning is accredited, since assessment is sometimes part of the equation, not just number of learning hours. Compare your ideas with this suggestion: Workbased learning project: a) In a workplace with which you are familiar, undertake an analysis of one of the following personnel selection interview job satisfaction Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 19 What are learning outcomes? organisational leadership and management structures office arrangements, layouts and communication channels Investors in People Health and safety policies and practices b) Write a 3,000 word essay that (i) sets the context of the workplace (ii) defines the issues found in workplace as compared with those found in the literature on the subject (iii) shows a critical awareness of the impact of individual difference and cultural diversity c) Prepare and deliver a 10 minute presentation to the class that compares the ways three different psychological perspectives would interpret your analysis and findings. Are any of the learning outcomes not being tested by this proposed assignment? Would any of the course objectives be left undemonstrated or redundant? Would the assessment be able to lead to a reliable and valid conclusion that the course aim has (or has not, in some cases) been met? Is the assignment likely to be realistic and feasible? Do you have any concerns or objections? How would you improve the suggested assignment to address your concerns? This approach enhances the coherence and consistency between aim, objectives and learning outcomes. However, it is not yet complete. We still need to specify the criteria by which we are going to mark or grade the written assignment and the presentation. And we have to ensure that the assessment is carried out at the appropriate level. In part this is reflected by the choice of active verbs and use of adverbs chosen to write the learning outcomes and the assessment tasks. In the written part of the assignment, the first part invites description. The assessment criteria can determine how that part of the assignment is marked or graded. Presumably, given the word length, advice should be given on how much space should be given over to this description of the context. Weaker students will tend to spend longer on this than on the analysis. The analysis asks for a comparison with the issues identified in the literature. Research skills (both in the workplace and in the library) are being tested here, which do not appear in the learning outcomes. Taking notes and writing an essay does. The emphasis on comparison is an analytic skill – not as high in the taxonomy as synthesis or evaluation skills, but beyond describing and classifying. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 20 What are learning outcomes? If the course was operating at postgraduate level, the tasks would have to be rewritten so that the learners could demonstrate synthetic skills as an outcome, or even evaluative skills. The presentation for example could ask the learner to evaluate, rather than compare the utility of three different psychological theories. Note the use of the adverb 'critically'. This adds to level required. Those who are not critical in their essay may still do enough to pass, but may not achieve the higher grades of merit or distinction that are reserved for those that do show evidence of critical awareness of individual differences and diversity. This is an illustrative example, and does not claim to be the best nor only way of assessing the learning outcomes. The choice of assessment strategies is typically complex and constrained by institutional procedures and resources. Course specific learning outcomes must, however, be the primary consideration. Finally, this section has not said anything about different modes of assessment. We know there are diagnostic, formative and summative functions of assessment. These apply to assessment by learning outcomes as much as any other approach to assessment. Just because the focus is on outcomes does not necessarily mean that the assessment should be left to the end. In some cases that may be appropriate, especially where learning needs to be integrated. However, as courses build up, different learning outcomes would be achievable at different stages. An earlier model suggested that some people might try to identify learning outcomes for each and every class. In such circumstances, given the large number of learning outcomes that may need to be assessed over the programme, some might be identified as diagnostic, others formative and the rest as summative. A version of learning outcomes is utilised in, for example, the acquisition of National Vocational Qualifications. The category of 'not yet achieved' is favoured over the more brutal and terminal 'failed'. This document has stressed that one of the advantages of learning outcomes approach is its flexibility, and learning outcomes can be assessed in different ways at different times, as specified in a clearly thought out assessment strategy. Assessment is typically carried our by tutors or other designated assessors. Some more innovative approaches utilise peer assessment, and there is increasing use of self assessment. For a range of reasons the Faculty of Continuing Education has introduced a mode of self assessment. The first attempt was not entirely successful, partly because it conflated assessment and evaluation (which are not the same thing). It also struggled because in the need to be applicable to the whole diverse provision it had to find the common denominator, which left the assessment at a very general level, not doing justice to the specifics of any course or learning event. Two alternative strategies emerged. The first was to abandon any intention of standardising the self assessment, and allow each course to design its own. This has problems both of standardisation and inequity. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 21 What are learning outcomes? Course aims Course objectives Curriculum content Learning outcomes Teachng methods Assessment Strategy Assessment Criteria Assessment Tasks Assessment Methods Tools instruments Awarding Bodies Standards Agencies Quality Assurance Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 22 What are learning outcomes? An alternative strategy is to standardise around the notion of learning outcomes. Providing all courses and learning activities expressed in terms of learning outcomes, the standardisation is in the question how far have the learning outcomes (however many, and whatever they are) been achieved? Whether or not we think this is all a good idea or not, the Quality Assurance Agency is committed to a programme specification built around learning outcomes, and will expect to see all our provision expressed in these terms. In most recent draft documentation concerning the programme specification, the QAA (2000) says: Formal and effective procedures should exist in all institutions for: the approval of new programmes of study; the subsequent monitoring of their effectiveness in achieving stated aims and the success of students in attaining the stated learning outcomes; the review of the continuing validity of those aims and outcomes. The QAA expects to see Design criteria The following points may be regarded as a starting point for reflection on approaches to programme design. They are intended to assist institutions develop their own guidance which will promote good practice in the design of programmes to ensure that standards are set appropriately and intended learning outcomes specified accordingly. Level Consideration should be given to the level of a programme and to the level of the stated learning outcomes at any named stages in the programme. A level is an indicator of the relative demand, complexity, depth of study and learner autonomy involved in a programme. Various systems are currently in use to identify levels, including descriptors indicating the intellectual and skill attainment expected of students. The introduction of the national qualifications frameworks will assist institutions to define the level of their programmes. Progression Consideration should be given to the way in which the curriculum promotes an organised progression so that the demands on the learner in intellectual challenge, skills, knowledge, and learning autonomy increase. Balance Consideration should be given to the balance within the programme of a number of elements, typically academic and practical elements, a concern for personal Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 23 What are learning outcomes? development and academic outcomes and a determination of breadth and depth of the subject material to be included in the programme. Flexibility The range of requirements of learners likely to enter the programme should be considered. Coherence Consideration should be given to the overall coherence and intellectual integrity of the programme. The programme should be designed in a way that will ensure the student's experience has a logic and integrity that are clearly linked to the purpose of the programme. Integrity The expectations given to student and others about the intended outcomes of the programme should be honest and deliverable. Consideration should be given to the feasibility of attainment of the outcomes. Points of reference Internal and external points of reference should be used to inform the design of the programme. External reference points might be provided by a subject benchmark statement, information about similar or parallel programmes elsewhere or expectations of professional or statutory regulatory bodies, or employer expectations (for example as set out in occupational standards). In a student negotiated programme, an inherent part of the negotiation process will involve the student and tutor in designing the programme, taking into consideration the intended level of the award and jointly agreeing the relevant sources of reference. In the quality assurance process, institutions should monitor the success of their programmes: to ensure that programmes remain current and valid in the light of developing knowledge in the discipline, and practice in its application, to evaluate the extent to which the intended outcomes are being attained by students, to evaluate the continuing effectiveness of the curriculum and of assessment in relation to the intended outcomes. This is the bottom line. Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 24 What are learning outcomes? References and further reading J. Allan (1996), ‘Learning outcomes in higher education’ Studies in Higher Education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 93-108 Mark Battersby (1997), 'Outcomes -based education: a college faculty perspective'. http://lists.ctt.bc.ca/lo/lqfeb97.html Mark Battersby (1999), ‘So what’s a learning outcome anyway?’ http://www.ctt.bc.ca/lo/sowhatsa.html N. Entwhistle (1992), The impact of teaching and learning outcomes in higher education: a literature review. CVCP, Sheffield Alan Jenkins and David Unwin (1996), 'How to write learning outcomes' http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/education/curricula/gisc/units/format/outcomes.html H. G. McIntosh and D. L. Nuttall (1981) Curriculum evaluation and assessment in educational institutions. Block 4 Measuring learning outcomes. Open University, Milton Keynes R. F. Melton (1997) Objectives, competences and learning outcome: developing instructional materials in open and distance learning. Kogan Page, London Evelyn Murray (1993) 'Assessing outcomes in the education of adults: a seminar organised by the Working Men's College and WEA London District June 1993'. Adults Learning, October, p.p49-50 Sue Otter (1992) Learning outcomes in higher education: a development project report. UDACE/Employment Department, Leicester Quality Assurance Agency (2000), Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education: Programme approval, monitoring and review. Draft, 3 April. http://www/qaa.ac.uk/COPapproval/introduction.html Unit for the Development of Adult Continuing Education (1989) Understanding learning outcomes: a development paper. NIACE, Leicester Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College Page 25