“I can't say it works everywhere but it works for me and I wouldn't have it any other way. Is it easy? NOPE! It took a lot of hard work, relationship building and there were snags a long the way but so far it is working!”
“I have a good friend and we share all the time. She rocks at assessment I rock at presentation. We meld our lessons and constantly trade information and lesson plans. What comes out in the end is great lessons and great assessment.”

2 native English speaking teachers (2006)
This paper will explore the collaboration and relationship between Native
English Speaking teachers (NESTs) and Korean English teachers (NNESTs). It isn’t always easy but with a little knowledge, most teachers can adapt and succeed as co-teachers. Two heads are definitely better than one!
There are significant benefits to co-teaching which have been researched and validated. The benefits include those for both teachers and students.
Co-Teaching Benefits
 better student to teacher ratio and more individual attention
(especially helpful to lower level students.).
 a wider use of instructional techniques, to better student learning
 more and better critical, planning and reflective practices by teachers
 social skills improvement / better classroom management.
 a more “community” oriented classroom
 increased score results.
Benefits for Teachers
 Teacher training in-house. The Korean English Teacher betters their own language skills while teaching.
 Both teachers develop new instructional techniques while teaching and sharing.

 New teachers can be given guidance and mentoring.
 Effective modeling for students.
 NESTs > less cultural adaptation.

Know Yourself Teachers that know their own teaching style, their own beliefs and teaching philosophy are more successful at co-teaching.

Know your co-teacher - Teachers who spend time to get to know each other BOTH socially and professionally, have more success at coteaching.

Know your students - Co-teachers should discuss students regularly and this will allow a common point of reference on which to build a successful relationship.
 Know your “stuff”- Teachers who are motivated to grow professionally and who make a concerted effort to learn on the job are more likely to be successful at co-teaching.
Keefe, Moore, Duff, (2004)
 Professional Respect / Rapport : Sharing and helping each other.

Adaptability : Able to change, accept criticism and feedback
 Belief in Inclusion : student centered philosophy, every student counts.
 Humor : don’t sweat the small stuff! It’s cross cultural!
Sturman, (1992)
The first thing co-teachers need to do (above and beyond getting to know each other) is to discuss their roles and responsibilities in their classroom. Each coteacher should fill out the S.H.A.R.E. co-teaching questionnaire individually (see the appendix) and then allow their co-teacher to read their thoughts. Finally, discuss together and go through each item individually.

The 3 Keys to Co-teaching: Planning / Disposition / Evaluation
1 ) Co-teachers need to plan regularly together (Sileo, 2003). Planning is crucial to any successful co-teaching. You should set up a weekly planning session or if that isn’t possible, plan and communicate through email or messenger.
2) A teacher’s “personality” should be one that is flexible and good social skills are a primary feature of successful co-teaching questionnaire. Be prepared to
“wear several hats” and to adapt your personality for each co-teacher.
3) Teachers with similar teaching philosophies and beliefs are also highly successful (see the Stages of Co-teaching diagram). This also goes for beliefs regarding evaluation (how, how often, type).
If you are co-teaching and the following situations seem familiar, you should be taking steps to change things. This might include talking to your co-teacher(s) and school administration or taking your concerns to your district supervisor.
1.
The foreign expert.
Foreign teachers are viewed as “all knowing”. This creates an imbalance in the classroom and eventually resentment. There must be a shared power in the classroom. There is no expert or rather, a Native expert and a Foreign expert.
Each have their particular skills and experience and relevance.
2. The “walking tape recorder”.
In this case, the Korean teacher feels that the foreign teacher lacks instructional skills and uses the NEST as a kind of puppet, only good for pronunciation and laughter, cultural communication.
3. The “token foreigner”.
Here, the NEST is only there to give the school pride as being progressive. They aren’t used as teachers. They are just a symbol of being “international” and progressive. (P. Struman, 1992)

I. THE CORNERSTONE: A PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS
The members of successful co-teaching teams share several common beliefs that constitute a philosophy or a system of principles that guide their practice.
II. INDIVIDUAL PREREQUISITES
Individual teachers voluntarily bring certain characteristics, knowledge, and skills to the co-teaching situation.
A. Co-teachers have personal characteristics that enable them to work effectively with another adult.
B.
C.
Co-teachers have sets of common knowledge and skills.
Co-teachers have discipline-specific knowledge and skills.
D. Co-teaching is voluntary (NOTE: This teacher perception is not
recommended practice for long-term program success).
III. THE PROFESSIONAL RELATIONSHIP
Co-teachers have unique professional relationships.
A. The professional relationship is built on parity, communication, respect,
and trust.
B. Co-teachers make a commitment to building and maintaining their professional relationship.
IV. CLASSROOM DYNAMICS
The interactions in a co-taught classroom are unique to this teaching arrangement.
A.
B.
Co-teachers clearly define classroom roles and responsibilities.
Coteachers’ instructional interactions reflect their professional relationship.
C. Co-teachers successfully maintain the instructional flow of the whole class by providing support to individual students.
D.
E.
The curriculum in co-taught classes explicitly addresses academic, developmental, compensatory, and life skills and reflects the needs of students in the class.
Co-teachers monitor their efforts.
V. EXTERNAL SUPPORTS
External support facilitates successful co-teaching.
A.
B.
Administrators support co-teaching
Appropriate professional development activities enhance co-teaching.

1. One Teach, One Observe. One of the advantages in co-teaching is that more detailed observation of students engaged in the learning process can occur. With this approach, for example, co-teachers can decide in advance what types of specific observational information to gather during instruction and can agree on a system for gathering the data. Afterward, the teachers should analyze the information together.
WHEN TO USE

In new co-teaching situations

When questions arise about students

To check student progress

To compare target students to others in class
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

Low
2. Station Teaching.
In this co-teaching approach, teachers divide content and students. Each teacher then teaches the content to one group and subsequently repeats the instruction for the other group. If appropriate, a third
"station" could give students an opportunity to work independently.
WHEN TO USE

When content is complex but not hierarchical

In lessons in which part of planned instruction is review

When several topics comprise instruction
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

Medium
3. Parallel Teaching.
On occasion, students' learning would be greatly facilitated if they just had more supervision by the teacher or more opportunity to respond. In parallel teaching, the teachers are both teaching the same information, but they divide the class group and do so simultaneously.
WHEN TO USE

When a lower adult-student ratio is needed to improve instructional efficiency

To foster student participation in discussions

For activities such as drill and practice, re-teaching, and test review
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

Medium
4. Alternative Teaching: In most class groups, occasions arise in which several students need specialized attention. In alternative teaching, one

teacher takes responsibility for the large group while the other works with a smaller group.
WHEN TO USE
 In situations where students’ mastery of concepts taught or about to be taught varies tremendously

When extremely high levels of mastery are expected for all students

When enrichment is desired

When some students are working in a parallel curriculum
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

High
5. Teaming: In team teaching, both teachers are delivering the same instruction at the same time. Some teachers refer to this as having “one brain in two bodies.” Others call it “tag team teaching.” Most co-teachers consider this approach the most complex but satisfying way to co-teach, but it is the approach that is most dependent on teachers’ styles.
WHEN TO USE

When two heads are better than one or experience is comparable or complementary

The teachers have a high sense of comfort and compatibility

During a lesson in which instructional conversation is appropriate

When a goal of instruction is to demonstrate some type of interaction to students
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

High
6. One Teach, One Assist. In a second approach to co-teaching, one person would keep primary responsibility for teaching while the other professional circulated through the room providing unobtrusive assistance to students as needed.
WHEN TO USE

When the lesson lends itself to delivery by one teacher

When one teacher has particular expertise for the lesson

In new co-teaching situations--to get to know each other

In lessons stressing a process in which student work needs close monitoring
AMOUNT OF PLANNING

Low

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCE MATERIALS ON CO-TEACHING
Adams, L., Cessna, K., & Friend, M. (1993). Effectiveness indicators of collaboration in special education/general education co-teaching: Final report.
Denver: Colorado Department of Education.
Bauwens, J. & Hourcade, J. J. (1991). Making co-teaching a mainstreaming strategy. Preventing School Failure, 35, (4), 19-24.
Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices.
Focus on Exceptional Children , 28(3), 1-16.
Dieker, Lisa, (2003) An Introduction to Cooperative Teaching, University of
Central Florida.
Friend, M., Reising, M., & Cook, L. (1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School
Failure, 37 (4), 6-10.
Gately, S., Gately, F., (2001), Understanding Co-teaching Components, Journal of Teaching Exceptional Children , 2 (3) 41-47
Keefe, Moore, Duff (2004), The 4 “Knows” of Collaborative Teaching, Journal of
Teaching Exceptional Children , 4(3), 36-41
Sileo, J. M. (2003). Co-teaching: Rationale for best practices. Journal of Asia-
Pacific Special Education, 3 (1), 17-26.
Sturman, P., (1992), Team Teaching: A case study from Japan, Collaborative
Language Learning and Teaching , Cambridge University Press, Nunan, D., 141-
161
Walther-Thomas, C. , (1997) Co-Teaching Experiences: The Benefits and
Problems That Teachers and Principals Report Over Time , Journal of Learning
Disabilities
(Please see my Research folder at http://mediafire.com/eflclassroom
for these articles and many, many more on co-teaching. You might also look at my co-teaching recommendations for the ETIS program.
Further, the Professional Development page on EFL Classroom 2.0 http://eflclassroom.com
offers further material. Please check the forums there for many discussions on co-teaching). You might also find useful – http://setiteachers.ning.com
. Please find the co-teaching discussion there.

Co-teaching survey: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education
Native Speaking English Teachers
CIRCLE THE CORRECT ANSWER
1.
I can easily read the nonverbal cues
of my co-teaching partner. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
2.
I feel comfortable moving freely about the space in the co-taught classroom. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
3. I understand the curriculum standards with
respect to the content area in the classroom.
RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
4. Both teachers in the classroom agree on
the goals of the classroom RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
5. Planning can be spontaneous, with changes occurring during the instructional lesson
RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
6.
I often present lessons in the co-taught class RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
7.
Classroom rules and routines have been
jointly developed. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
8.
Many measures are used for grading
students. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
9. Humor is often used in the classroom. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
10. All materials are shared in the classroom. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
11. I am familiar with the methods and materials needed to teach the curriculum.
RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
12. Modifications of goals for different level
students are incorporated into this class. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
13.
Planning for classes is the shared
responsibility of both teachers. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
The "chalk" passes freely between the
14. two teachers. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
15. A variety of classroom management techniques
is used to enhance learning RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
16. Communication is open and honest.
RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
17.
There is fluid (changing) positioning of
teachers in the classroom RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
18.
I feel confident in my knowledge of
the curriculum content RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS

19.
The administration encourages and supports both teachers and co-teaching. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
20.
Both teachers share curriculum resources;
audio-video, books, tests, blackline masters
RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
21. Students accept both teachers as equal
partners in the learning process RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
22.
Time is allotted (or found) for common planning. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
23.
Behavior management is the shared
responsibility of both teachers. RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
24
I feel happy about my relationship
with my co-teacher RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
25.
We hold meetings and give honest feedback about lessons RARELY SOMETIMES USUALLY ALWAYS
SCORING: RARELY = 1 SOMETIMES = 2 USUALLY = 3 ALWAYS= 4
< 50 = a poor co-teaching relationship
51
– 75 = a satisfactory (but in need of improvement) co-teaching relationship
76 – 100 = a healthy co-teaching relationship
Discuss afterwards with your co-teaching partner. What differences did you see?
How can you improve those parts of your relationship?
State your future co-teaching goal