SUPPORTING INFORMATION FOR Comparison of Brownian Dynamic-Based Estimates of Polymer Tension with Direct Force Measurements Mark E. Arsenault(a), Prashant K Purohit (a) , Yale E. Goldman(b), Henry Shuman(b), Haim H. Bau(a) ,* (a) Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics and Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104 (b) Pennsylvania Muscle *email: bau@seas.upenn.edu S.1 Optical Trap Calibration Every bead trapped during our experiments was calibrated in order to convert the photodiode signals into direct force measurements. The experiments presented in this document were carried out with aqueous solution as the suspending medium. Similar calibration experiments (not reported here) were carried out with glycerin. Figure S.1 depicts the power spectrum G (and the respective fit) of an optically trapped, 1 m-diameter bead undergoing Brownian motion, sampled at 20 kHz. The power spectrum of the thermal fluctuations of a bead in a harmonic well is (Svoboda and Block 1994): G f t k BT 2 fc 2 ft2 , (S.1) where ft is the frequency, =6r is the bead’s hydrodynamic drag coefficient, fc=/(2) is the trap’s characteristic frequency, is the trap’s spring constant, is the solution viscosity, r is the bead radius, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. This expression can be rearranged, yielding G f t 4 k B T 1 2 C f 1 t f c 2 , (S.2) where C is the voltage to force conversion factor. The power spectrum in Fig. S.1 is fit by equation (S.2) (solid line). When ft << fc, G 4kBT/C2. From this low frequency asymptote, we determine the bead’s voltage to force conversion factor C = 12.2 pN/V. The corner frequency fc = 230 Hz corresponds to spring constant = 0.014 pN/nm. As the second calibration technique, we applied hydrodynamic drag to optically-trapped beads by moving the microscope stage back and forth in a triangle wave form. The triangle wave displacement profile of the microscope stage exerts a square wave hydrodynamic drag profile on the bead. Figure S.2 depicts the quadrant-photodiode signal of the same optically-trapped bead from Fig. S.1 (dashed line) superimposed on the microscope stage’s position (solid line). The equation of motion of the bead, neglecting the inertial term, is x x FS t , t (S.3) where FS is the force on the bead. Equation (S.3) admits the solution t FS xt 1 e , (S.4) where FS = u; u = 2A is the stage’s velocity; A is the peak-to-peak amplitude of the stage’s displacement; and is the frequency of the triangle wave (s-1). The displacement of the bead out of the trap is recorded as a signal from the quadrant photodiode. From equation (S.4), the equilibrium displacement xeq 2 A C (S.5) (measured in V) of a bead attached to a Hookean spring and acted upon by a constant drag force. By measuring the average steady-state displacement of the bead from its equilibrium positions (horizontal dotted lines in Fig. S.2) and inserting this value into Eq. (S.5), we estimate the trap’s voltage to force conversion factor C = 13.7 pN/V. The estimates based on the hydrodynamic drag method and the power spectrum method agree within 15%. -5 10 Power (V22s)s) PowerSpectrum Spectrum (V -6 10 -7 10 -8 10 -9 10 -10 10 0 10 2 10 Frequency (Hz) (Hz) Frequency 4 10 Figure S.1: The power spectrum of an optically trapped, 1-m diameter bead undergoing Brownian motion. The solid line corresponds to equation (S.2) with C = 12.2 pN/V and fc=230 Hz. 0.03 0.01 0 -0.01 -2 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Detector Signal (V)(V) Detector Signal StageDisplacement Displacement ( m) Stage (m) 2 -0.03 0.5 Time (s) Time (s) Figure S.2: The photodiode signal from the same optically-trapped bead (dashed line) superimposed on the microscope stage’s position (solid line). The stage is oscillating as a triangle wave ( = 10 Hz). The average steady-state displacement, denoted by horizontal dotted lines, is compared to the steady-state value expected from equation (S.7). This gives us the voltage to force conversion factor C = 13.7 pN/V.