09/07
1
Employee
Performance Review
BIOLA UNIVERSITY
Employee’s Name:
Supervisor:
Position:
Department:
Review Period
From:
To:
Completed Review Date:
Briefly, list the previously-established objectives for this review period and evaluate the degree to which they have been attained:
7/06
Performance Factors
1
Misses few work days
2
Arrives at work on time.
3
Applies consistent energy level
throughout the work-day
4
Gets tasks done on time; meets deadline
commitments; reliable and dependable
5
Produces a high quantity of work in a day
6
Does the work accurately and with
attention to detail
7
Has mastery of all the skills and
knowledge of the job as expected by
supervisor at this point and time
8
Is appropriately proficient in the use of
computers and other technological
resources
9
Keeps his/her work area reasonably neat
and orderly
10 Is able to work with a minimum of
supervision; Has initiative; self-motivated
to begin work or proceed with work to
completion without distraction or giving
up
11 Understands applicable departmental
work procedures and rules, and follows
them
12 Understands instructions and
explanations and learns quickly
Reviewer: Comment where necessary to
more accurately or fully describe
the indicated level of performance.
Exceptionally Characteristic;
Greatly Exceeded Standards
Very Characteristic;
Generally Exceeded Standards
Characteristic;
Achieved Standards
Somewhat Characteristic;
Marginally Achieved Standards
Reviewer & Employee Comments
Not Characteristic;
Standards Not Achieved
Mark the level which best describes
performance during the review period. If the
performance factor is not applicable to the
position or if there had not been sufficient
opportunity to gauge performance, please
indicate “DNA” (Does Not Apply). Any
mark that is not in the middle column must
be explained in the comments section. (For
descriptive DEFINITIONS of the five levels,
refer to the KEY on page 5).
2
Employee: (Optional) you may comment on
any of the indicated levels of
performance or supervisory
comments.
13 Has creative ideas; thinks of new
approaches to work problems and
procedures
14 Is able to "think through" normal work
problems and solve them independently;
yet, involves others when necessary or
appropriate
15 Accepts responsibilities even when they
are tough or unpleasant; does not look for
the "easy way out"
16 Adapts well to new or unusual situations;
is flexible
17 Is able to withstand pressure and remain
calm in difficult situations
18 Has the ability to communicate clearly and
concisely; to give feedback to others in an
open and respectful manner
19 Is able to listen to and understand others
20 Has the ability to accept constructive
feedback and takes responsibility for
mistakes without reacting defensively
21 Works well with fellow employees
22 Shows respect to all persons, including
those in authority
23 Provides good customer service to
students, fellow employees, and guests.
24 Demonstrates awareness and use of safe
work practices
Exceptionally Characteristic;
Greatly Exceeded Standards
Very Characteristic;
Generally Exceeded Standards
Characteristic;
Achieved Standards
Somewhat Characteristic;
Marginally Achieved Standards
Performance Factors
3
Not Characteristic;
Standards Not Achieved
09/07
Reviewer & Employee Comments
7/06
OVERALL RATING, considering
all performance factors and their
relative importance to the job:
(Please refer to the key below).
4
[
[
[
[
[
]
]
]
]
]
Greatly Exceeded Standards
Generally Exceeded Standards
Achieved Standards
Marginally Achieved Standards
Standards Not Achieved
Key:
Greatly Exceeded Standards / Exceptionally Characteristic
This rating should reflect the performance of a truly outstanding performer, one whose behavior, as regards this topic, is exemplary.
This rating should be reserved for those who consistently perform at a level you could describe as “the best of the best.”
Generally Exceeded Standards / Very Characteristic
On a regular basis, this individual’s performance more than lives up to expectations for getting the job done in regard to the attribute in
question. This person behaves in a way that inspires confidence that they will represent themselves and the organization with
distinction.
Achieved Standards / Characteristic
If you compare this person’s performance with the normal, expected standard of acceptable achievement, you would find them fully
competent and you would be pleased that this individual is “pulling their share of the load” and making a solid contribution to the
workplace. NOTE: Most employees who meet standards fully will be in this column.
Marginally Achieved Standards / Somewhat Characteristic
While the person performs up to the standard, expected level for this trait frequently, you could not say that this level is achieved
consistently and dependably. Their periodic attainment of the standard performance level indicates that, with proper resources, and by
applying themselves to the challenge, they are capable of achieving that level of performance on a more routine basis.
Standards Not Achieved / Not Characteristic
In regard to the performance factor in question (or the overall rating), this individual is consistently performing below the level that is
expected and acceptable. Attention needs to be paid to raising the performance level, with the supervisor offering specific guidance
and support in this area, and with the individual employee assuming responsibility for making a concerted effort at adequate
improvement.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_
In which responsibilities, skills, or other performance factors has there been a significant degree of success or growth?
List specific goals or objectives to be achieved during the NEXT review period.
7/06
5
Provide suggestions for this employee's development - things that would improve their ability to achieve objectives, enhance their
performance or increase their potential for greater responsibility.
Reviewer’s Comments:
Reviewer's Signature ___________________________________
Date ____________________
Reviewer’s Position _____________________________________________________________
Manager Approval Signature (Reviewer’s Manager) ______________________________________
Employee's Comments (Optional): Comment here and/or by performance factors on pages 2 and 3.
Did your supervisor meet with you and discuss your review in detail?
[ ] Yes
[ ] No
Employee's Signature __________________________________
Date _____________________
Employee’s Position ________________________________________________________________
Date _______________