Campus Improvement Plan 2013-2014 Campus: Reaves Elementary Rating: Met Standard Goal 1: Student Achievement and Post-Secondary Success Reaves Elementary School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare all students for graduation and post secondary success. 1.1 Master Rigorous Academic Standards Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3-4; all subjects; all students; % met phase-in Level I standard Index 2: Student Progress Grades 3-4; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress o Top 25% Distinction, including Top quartile of campus comparison group in performance on Index 2, Greater Than Expected Progress in ELA, and Greater Than Expected Progress in Math. 1.2 Close the Performance Gap Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Grades 3-4; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (phase-in Level I) 1.3 Successful Completion of High School Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Grades 3-8; HS:4-year or 5-year graduation rates (or annual dropout rate, if no graduation rate), all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, SP Ed; RHSP/DAP annual rates, all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups; STAAR % met final level II standard on one or more tests, all students, 7 race/ethnic groups, combined over all subject areas. Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designations (AADD). K-8: 50% of measures in top quartile; HS: 33% of measures of measures in top quartile GOAL 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND POST-SECONDARY SUCCESS Core Analysis CISD Curriculum Reaves Elementary School disaggregates and analyzes performance on Texas Statewide Assessments (STAAR, TELPAS, PBMAS): by content, by grade, by campus (all students), by student groups (African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, White, 2 or More Races, Economically Disadvantaged, ELLs, and Students with Disabilities), and by program (Special Education, Bilingual or ESL, migrant, CTE) to determine target areas of improvement. Reaves Elementary School implements the CISD Curriculum, which is aligned with the TEKS and has integrated the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), Career and College Readiness Standards (CCRS), and the Technology Applications TEKS for grades K-12. The curriculum establishes rigorous standards through the depth and complexity of the content, processes, and assessment. The Reading/ELA curriculum, CISD Reads, is a balanced literacy model that includes the instructional components of phonemic awareness, phonics, semantics and syntax, reading /thinking together, shared reading, guided reading, strategic reading, independent reading, modeled writing, shared writing, interactive writing, guided writing, and independent writing. The Mathematics curriculum, CISD Solves, is a balanced math model that ensures the development of computational skills, mathematical reasoning and problem-solving abilities, conceptual understanding, and demonstration of mathematical understanding in a variety of assessment formats. CISD Solves includes the use of math review, mental math, problem solving, poster method, and math fluency. CISD Best Practices 2/16/2016 The Science curriculum, CISD Investigates, includes the use of the 5-E lesson model (engage, explore, explain, elaborate, and evaluate), science interactive notebook, and Science Success, the CISD science review process. The Social Studies curriculum, CISD Remembers, includes engagement through student centered instructional strategies based on History Alive! or Social Studies Alive!, integrates content literacy strategies K-12 and emphasizes the roles and responsibilities of global citizenship by recognizing the interconnectedness between global issues and the actions and decisions of ordinary citizens. Reaves Elementary School implements and supports the following CISD best practices: The Curriculum and Instruction Model (CISD Instructional Model) accommodates for the needs of all student populations through Tier 1 best practices of differentiating the content, process, product, 1 1.1 1.2 and environment, and ensures that all students construct multiple representations of learning. CISD Instructional Model incorporates the foundational research of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences, Cooperative Learning, Brain-Based Learning, Understanding Poverty, and Marzano’s Research of Nine Instructional Strategies of Effective Teaching and Building Academic Vocabulary. The three components of the CISD Instructional Model include the alignment of the TEKS, the students’ Learning process of the required curriculum, and the ongoing Assessment in which both teachers and students evaluate their learning. Tier I Differentiated instruction is provided to all students and all student groups through strategies, techniques and resources that include tiered assignments; flexible groupings; anchor activities; scaffolding; frequent monitoring; Bloom’s Taxonomy of Critical Thinking, Quality Questioning, Thinking Maps, CRISS and Sheltered Instruction Using the SIOP Model. Response to Intervention is addressed through Tier I, II, and III practices and interventions appropriate for the individual student. MASTER RIGOROUS ACADEMIC STANDARDS - INDEX 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT and INDEX 2: STUDENT PROGRESS CLOSE THE PERFORMANCE GAP - INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS INDEX 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT OBJECTIVE INDEX 2: STUDENT PROGRESS OBJECTIVES INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS OBJECTIVES Focus Strategies READING/ELA Performance Objective Focus Strategies 2/16/2016 Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3-4; all subjects; all students; % met phase-in Level I standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet phase-in Level I performance standard in STAAR 3-4; STAAR 3-4 Modified and Alternate; STAAR L. Index 2: Student Progress Grades 3-4; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress 1. 90% of ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math. 2. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Grades 3-4, HS; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (phase-in Level I) 1. 90% Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance phase-in Level I 2. Will meet Top 25% Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math Provide intensive, systematic tutoring for identified at-risk students before, during and after school. Provide mentors to targeted at-risk students. Provide intensive, systematic, research-based reading instruction to identified dyslexic at-risk students. Ensure that ELL students receive appropriate English language acquisition and sheltered instruction. Provide RtI through Tier 1 research-based best practices and Tier II and III interventions to facilitate academic improvement for identified students. As School Wide Title I campus, general education teachers provide differentiated instructional strategies to improve the achievement of all at-risk students. Review, revise, and implement daily attendance procedures to meet 95% average attendance. Promote students as “Future CISD High School Students” through activities within feeder and district, including: Tiger Challenge, football games, pep rallies, student visits, etc. READING/ELA CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students and student groups taking the general STAAR assessment, STAAR Modified, or STAARL in Reading/ELA will meet phase-in Level I: Satisfactory Performance Level; 35% will meet Level III: Advanced Performance Level; and will increase weighted progress in Index 2 from 76 to 100 out of 200. Target: Reporting Category 1 – 3rd & 4th Grade African American, Hispanic, Special Ed., Eco. Dis. and LEP; Reporting Category 2 – 3rd & 4th Grade All Students, African American, Hispanic, White and LEP; Reporting Category 3 – 3rd & 4th Grade African American Reading/ELA Performance Safeguard Target (if applicable):N / A Emphasize higher level questioning within each component of CISD READS: Reading Aloud and Thinking Together, Shared/Strategic Reading, Guided Reading, and Independent Reading in 2 whole group, flexible groups, and with individual students Re-examine effectiveness and depth of Guided Reading in the K-4 classroom through an in-depth examination of classroom practices and focus on the critical role of texts and the expert teaching in the process of reading Continue the integration of Elementary Language Arts into Social Studies content K-4 Provide leadership, training, and follow-through on the implementation of CISD READS. Develop and implement common formative assessments to assist in monitoring achievement, including matching rigor of the questions to the requirement of the TEKS, using data to write and review common assessment items, and focusing on the benefits of teacher collaboration when developing and reviewing common assessments. Continue the emphasis on small group reading instruction such as in guided reading, tracking individual progress through documentation (including ARI) using anecdotal notes and implementation of effective tutorial programs for students. Continue to use differentiated instruction to develop reading strategies that modify for identified gifted reading students and/or close learning gaps, such as using lessons from The Comprehension Toolkit (Stephanie Harvey) and Interactive Read Aloud (Linda Hoyt). The District and Campus Instructional Literacy Coaches will provide campus based “customized” reading staff development and assist teachers with reading instruction throughout the school year. WRITING CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students and student groups taking the general STAAR assessment, STAAR Modified, or STAARL in Writing/ELA will meet phase-in Level I: Satisfactory Performance Level; and 25% will meet Level III: Advanced Performance Level. Target: Reporting Category 1 – 4th Grade Hispanic and LEP (Personal Narrative / Expository); Reporting Category 3 – 4th Grade All Students Writing Performance Safeguard Target (if applicable):N / A Continue to focus on daily writing in every K-4 classroom in both fiction and nonfiction genres. Explicitly teach grammar and conventions within the context of the CISD READS Writers' Workshop model by implementing Mentor Sentences and the Lucy Calkins CISD Writing Calendars for Grades 1-4. Provide fourth grade teachers with staff development to focus on personal narrative and expository writing along with the effective teaching of revising and editing. Provide leadership, training, and follow-through on the implementation of the CISD READS Writers’ Workshop model using the Lucy Calkins Writing Model for grades K-4. Develop and implement common formative assessments to assist in monitoring achievement, including matching rigor of the questions to the requirement of the TEKS, using data to write and review common assessment items, and focusing on the benefits of teacher collaboration when developing and reviewing common assessments. Develop and implement a writing camp to promote writing, revising / editing and reading mentor texts to improve student engagement in writing. The District and Campus Instructional Literacy Coaches will provide campus based “customized” writing staff development throughout the school year. MATH CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students and student groups taking the general STAAR assessment, STAAR Modified, or STAARL in Math will meet phase-in Level I: Satisfactory Performance Level; 40% will meet Level III: Advanced Performance Level; and will increase weighted progress in Index 2 from 105 to 125 out of 200. Target: Reporting Category 1 – 3rd & 4th Grade African American and Special Ed.; Reporting Category 2 – 3rd & 4th Grade African American, Hispanic and LEP; Reporting Category 3 – 3rd & 4th Grade African American Math Performance Safeguard Target (if applicable):N / A Emphasize multiple representations of learning in math within each component of CISD Solves Math Structure: Math Review / Mental Math, Poster Method and Math Fluency in whole group, flexible groups, and with individual students. Provide leadership, training, and follow-through on the implementation of the CISD Solves Math WRITING Performance Objective Focus Strategies MATH Performance Objective Focus Strategies 2/16/2016 3 Structure. Develop and implement common formative assessments to assist in monitoring achievement, including matching rigor of the questions to the requirement of the TEKS, using data to write and review common assessment items, and focusing on the benefits of teacher collaboration when developing and reviewing common assessments. Continue the emphasis on small group math instruction such as in guided math, tracking individual progress through documentation (including AMI) using anecdotal notes and implementation of effective tutorial programs for teachers. Continue to use differentiated instruction to develop math strategies that modify for identified gifted math students and/or close learning gaps, such as using Number Sense Routines (Shumway), Math Work Stations (Diller), Guided Math (Sammons) and Kim Sutton. The Title I teacher will provide small group instruction of target math skills for at-risk students needing additional interventions. The District and Campus Instructional Math Coaches will provide campus based “customized” math staff development and assist teachers with math instruction throughout the school year. SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students and student groups taking the general STAAR assessment, STAAR Modified, or STAARL in Social Studies will meet phase-in Level I: Satisfactory Performance Level; 25% will meet Level III: Advanced Performance Level. Continue the integration of Social Studies content into Elementary Language Arts K-4. Provide leadership, training, and follow-through on the implementation of CISD Remembers. Ensure that teachers plan and implement social studies lessons based on the district scope and sequence CISD Remembers. Continue to use differentiated instruction in the focus area of engagement that modify for identified gifted math students and/or close learning gaps, such as using hands-on activities from Social Studies Alive! Provide Texas Studies Weekly Newspapers (K-4th) to integrate social studies curriculum with language arts instruction. SCIENCE CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students and student groups taking the general STAAR assessment, STAAR Modified, or STAARL in Science will meet phase-in Level I: Satisfactory Performance Level; 25% will meet Level III: Advanced Performance Level. Target: Reporting Category: Provide leadership, training, and follow-through on the implementation of CISD Investigates. Ensure that teachers plan and implement TEKS aligned science lessons using the 5-E lesson model (engage, explore, explain, elaborate, and evaluate) based on the district scope and sequence CISD Investigates. Improve vocabulary building in Science through the Science Word of the Week (WOW), Science word walls, and the use of Marzano Words in the district scope and sequence. Ensure that teachers require all students to utilize a science interactive notebook as part of their learning process Continue to use differentiated instruction to develop science process skills and concepts that modify for identified gifted math students and/or close learning gaps, such as using CISD Science Success (K-4) and STEMScopes (4). HEALTH CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT: FOCUS, CLARITY, DEPTH 90% of all students will meet or exceed their personal Healthy Fitness Zone standards. Coordinate lesson plans that have students involved in MVPA for at least 65% of class time. Track and evaluate students’ personal level of health related fitness through student-developed short term and long term goals, testing with Fitnessgram two times a year (Fall and Spring), and practice sessions at last once each 6 weeks. Ensure students are well informed of physical activity that can be performed outside of the Physical Education classroom in order to keep them physically active throughout their lifetime. SOCIAL STUDIES Performance Objective Focus Strategies SCIENCE Performance Objective Focus Strategies HEALTH Performance Objective Focus Strategies 2/16/2016 Engage students regularly in exercising, stretching and running in a standard format, as well as 4 games and activities. SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF HIGH SCHOOL POSTSECONDARY READINESS (Index 4) INDEX 4: INDEX 4: POSTSECONDARY READINESS POSTSECONDARY Grades 3-8, High School READINESS 90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on one or more tests combined OBJECTIVES over all subject areas. Meet Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designations (AADD) in Reading/ELA and Math K-8 50% of measures will be in top quartile Grades 3-12 AADD Indicators Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98% Increase Level III Performance in Reading/ELA from 24% to 35%. Increase Level III Performance in Writing grade 4from 10% to 25%. Increase Level III Performance in Math from 28% to 35%. Increase greater than expected growth in ELA from 13% to 25%. Increase greater than expected growth in Math from 34% to 45%. Grade 3-12 Safeguard Indicators Safeguard Target for Participation Rate(if applicable): N/A Focus Strategies Ensure that teachers implement strategies/techniques in their classroom to promote regular attendance. Communicate the attendance laws to parents annually and reinforce the importance of regular school attendance. Promote students as “Future CISD High School Students” through activities within feeder and district, including: Tiger Challenge, football games, pep rallies, student visits, etc. Financial Resources Campus budget SCE, Title I, Title III Additional Resources Curriculum: CISD Instructional Model, CISD Reads, CISD Solves, CISD Investigates, CISD Remembers, CISD English Language Acquisition Model for Bilingual Education Programs, Gifted & Talented Assessment: STAAR, STAAR M, STAAR L, STAAR Alt, TELPAS, District Benchmarks, Campus Common Assessments, Universal Screeners, Stanford, DRA, OS, QPS, PAPI, SAT, ACT Systems: ViewIt, Eduphoria, INOVA Process, Quintiles, Curriculum Heat Maps Monitoring Timeline November, January, April Formative Evaluation CISD Benchmarks at 70% passing rate Summative Evaluation TEA Data Tables AEIS Project Manager(s): Principal Assistant Principal 1.3 Goal 2 RECRUITMENT, DEVELOPMENT, AND RETENTION OF STAFF Objective Strategies To recruit, retain and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students. Additional Resources Ensure the appropriate certification and highly qualified requirements for professional and paraprofessional s. Provide mentor support for beginning teachers. Improve qualifications of teachers by providing opportunities to attend workshops and trainings sessions. Provide opportunities for teachers to attend GT training to maintain HQ status in the area of GT. Provide opportunities for teachers to acquire ESL certification. Campus budget Teacher Activity Fund Title III Position Control Reports Allocation Reports Monitoring November, January, March Financial Resources 2/16/2016 5 Timeline Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Project Manager(s): Goal 3 HQ data from Human Resources AEIS HQ Report to TEA Principal Assistant Principal PARENTS AND COMMUNITY Objective Strategies Financial Resources Additional Resources Monitoring Timeline Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Project Manager Goal 4 To work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through communication, collaborative partnerships and unity of purpose. Provide communications regarding campus initiatives, programs, meetings, and activities through a variety of media, including campus website, e- newsletters, email announcements, campus meetings, and other sources. Expand the campus partnerships with Conroe Noon Lions Club and Sam Houston State University to support the educational achievement of all students. Provide opportunities at school for parents to participate in academic and social events with students. Provide information nights, curriculum nights, and parent/teacher conferences so parents fully understand the rigor and complexity of CISD curriculum and assessment. Utilize the CISD and campus website to promote campus and district events and information for parents, families, communities and businesses. Hold school improvement committee meetings weekly on a rotating basis to provide opportunities for teacher collaboration and understanding of prior and future curricular expectations. Hold weekly PLC and grade level planning meetings to ensure teacher collaboration within each department/grade. Campus budget Title I Campus Key Communicators Translation services Local media Safe Schools Plan Technology Formative November, January Summative July Record of contact with media Record of press releases Record of campus communication Website information is current and accurate Meet Performance Indicators for Campus Principal SAFE SCHOOLS Objective Strategies To provide a safe and orderly school environment conducive to learning for all students and staff. 2/16/2016 Conduct fire, disaster, lock-downs, evacuation, and emergency drills to ensure the effectiveness of Emergency operations Plans at the district and campus level. Ensure the EOP addresses the areas of safety control, crisis management, facilities management and health services. Ensure the safety of students by requiring all visitors’ sign in with a valid, government issued ID and wear visitor badges in the school. 6 Financial Resources Additional Resources Monitoring Timeline Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Project Manager(s): Goal 5 Implement bullying prevention and intervention strategies: faculty training through Safe Schools: Bullying: Recognition & Response Full Course and Online Safety: What Every Educator Needs to Know; CISD online resources at http://www.conroeisd.net/Bullying/student_guide.asp; campus programs and presentations. Provide student education in safe schools and personal safety/wellness through implementation of programs on character development; conflict resolution; drug, alcohol, and tobacco resistance; and life/coping skills. Campus budget Emergency operations plan Formative November, January Summative July Record of programs/presentations/trainings for students and staff Quarterly reports of police activity and safety drills for campus Clean safety audit Principal Assistant Principal TECHNOLOGY Objective Strategies Financial Resources Additional Resources Monitoring Timeline Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation Project Manager(s): To ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers. Increase student opportunities for utilizing technology across the curriculum areas. Ensure the Technology Applications TEKS are met across content areas. Provide hands-on training in use of new technology hardware and software. Provide staff development on integration of technology across the curriculum. Ensure staff and students utilize technology as a tool and resource within curriculum and assessment. Build teacher capacity to fully implement technology in instruction Provide meaningful opportunities for students to access technology for learning Relate technology staff development to specific instructional objectives Campus budget Title I Technology staff Formative Summative November, January July Records of professional development in technology Campus and District Technology Plans align with strategies Meet Performance Indicators for STaR Report Principal Assistant Principal Technology Liaison NON-DISCRIMINATION STATEMENT The Conroe Independent School District is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability in employment matters, in its admissions policies, or by excluding from participation in, denying access to, or denying the benefits of district services, academic and/or vocational and technology programs, or activities as required by Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 2/16/2016 7 For information about Title IX rights, contact the Title IX Coordinator, 3205 W. Davis, Conroe, Texas 77304; (936) 709-7700. For information about Section 504/ADA rights, contact the Section 504/ADA Coordinator, 3205 W. Davis, Conroe, Texas 77304; (936) 709-7670. 2/16/2016 8 State Compensatory Education Program 2013-2014 School Year Strategy SCE Program/Service EXAMPLE: Reading/ELA Strategy 4; Writing Strategy 4; and Math Strategy 1 Academic Tutorials General Education Teachers for At-Risk Students Funds Budgeted FTEs 12,594.00 1.0 1,246,052.57 21.0 Total Funds Budgeted and FTEs 22.0 Resources Allocated for Title I - III 2013-2014 School Year Strategy Program/Service Funds Budgeted FTEs Title IA Instructional Support – Professionals Subs Computer Equipment Books Instructional Supplies IPad Carts Staff Development Parent Involvement TOTAL Title IA 211,617.70 5,175.00 10,000.00 959.25 6,902.05 15,000.00 3,500.00 2,736.00 255,890.00 3.25 00 00 3.25 Title III LEP Extra Duty 2,250 Computer / AV 2,250 Books 2,000 General Supplies TOTAL Title III 1,500 8,000 Extra Duty Computer / AV Books General Supplies TOTAL Title III 1,375 750 875 500 3,500 0 Title III Immigrant 8.14.13 2/16/2016 9 0 0