Sir Muir Grey Presentation Page 1 Improving Eye Care through Maximising Value: the population approach Sir Muir Gray Miss Aeesha Malik Page 2 The NHS in a word 1948-Free 1970’s and 80’s- Effectiveness 1990’s-Cost-effectiveness 2000’s-Quality and Safety 2010, and for the rest of the century… Page 3 Value = Outcomes / Costs Outcome = Good – Bad (Effectiveness – Harm) Costs ≠ Money Costs = Harm + Carbon + Opportunity Lost Page 4 Lower value activities are those which 1. Have clear evidence that they are ineffective or that they do more harm than good. 2. Have no evidence of effectiveness but are not being delivered in the context of research that would allow evidence to judge effectiveness to be gathered. 3. Have evidence of effectiveness but are being offered to patients whose characteristics are different from the characteristics of the patients in the research studies which produced the evidence of effectiveness. 4. Treat a patient who has not been given unbiased information in a way that they can understand the probability of both benefit and harm of accepting the offer of treatment Use resources which would produce more value, namely a better balance of benefit to harm, if invested in some other service Page 5 Commissioning Growth ££ DIAGRAM SHOWING 3 PIE CHARTS 1st one is COMMISSIONING, The Opthalomology piece of commissioning split into another pie chart showing Cataract, Retinopothy, ARMD and Glaucoma then split into a 3rd pie chart showing Low Vision Services and Lucentis or Avastin Page 6 DIAGRAM SHOWING SINGLE PIE CHART WITH Lucentis or Avastin Page 7 DIAGRAM SHOWING TWO PIE CHARTS 1ST with Lucentis or Avastin with an arrow towards another pie chart showing Cataract, Retinopothy, ARMD and Glaucoma Page 8 DIAGRAM 3 Pie Charts of COMMISSIONING, The Opthalomology piece of commissioning split into another pie chart showing Cataract, Retinopothy, ARMD and Glaucoma then split into a 3rd pie chart showing Low Vision Services and Lucentis or Avastin Page 9 1. Is the service for people with glaucoma in Manchester better than the service in Liverpool? 2. Who is responsible for the retinopathy service for people in Warrington? 3. How many AMD services are there in England and how many should there be? 4. Which cataract service provides the best value? 5. Which cataract service improved most in the last year ? 6. Who is responsible for publishing the Annual Report on AMD care in England? Page 10 THIS PAGE IS BLANK PAGE 11 CHART SHOWING THE GROWTH OF OPPTHALMOLOGY OUTPATIENT ATTENDANCES AGAIN YEARS FROM 2003 TO 2009 Page 12 CHART SHOWING Ophthalmology first and subsequent outpatient APPOINTMENTS Page 13 PICTURE showing Total attendance outpatient expenditure rate, 2009/10 (weighted for age, sex and need - per 1,000 population) Page 14 PICTURE showing Phakoemulsification Cataract Extraction and Insertion of Lens Inpatient expenditure rate, 2008/9 Page 15 PICTURE Measuring Variation • • Outpatient attendances • Per 1000 population • Follow-up to first attendance ratio • First attendances per 1000 population +/- by source of referral Day case admissions • • Per 1000 population Cost • Out patient costs per 1000 population • Number of sight tests • Out patient costs per 1000 population Page 16 Sustainable, Accountable Systems Agreed objectives, standards, outcomes to minimise un-warranted variation and maximise value in communities Page 17 Eyes and Vision Programme Systems Glaucoma, AMD, Emergency Eye Care. Networks Patient Pathways PICTURE OF VISION 2020 EYE CARE NETWORK Page 18 AMD Pathway Map of Medicine PICTURE OF AMD MAP OF MEDICINE Page 19 Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disorders Programme Standards GRAPH OF STANDARDS Page 20 The NHS Outcomes framework is organised around five domains that cover all treatment activity for which the NHS is responsible These will help the public, NHS Commissioning Board and Secretary of State for Health to track: How EFFECTIVE the care provided by the NHS is What the patient EXPERIENCE is like How SAFE the care provided is The five domains will cover the range of activities that the NHS should be delivering for all patients Domain 1 Preventing people from dying prematurely Domain 2 Enhancing quality of life for people with long-term conditions Domain 3 Helping people to recover from episodes of ill health or following injury Domain 4 Ensuring that people have a positive experience of care Domain 5 Treating and caring for people in a safe environment and protecting them from avoidable harm Page 21 What are the outcomes for our patients? Have we improved from last year? How does we compare to others? PICTURE OF WEBSITE PAGE ‘COMMISSIONERS QUESTIONS ABOUT GLAUCOMA’ Page 22 Developing Sustainable Systems Monitor the service outcomes and value being delivered Adapt to new integrated pathways Strong networks to allow people to be treated by right person in right place Cope with increasing demand Sustain high quality health service for patients Reduce inequalities and preventable disease Page 23 Population medicine Skills development as part of professional development Developing a role for a ‘clinical lead’ in a population- integrating care with community Page 24 Why did 1 in 4 people with diabetes who are eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening not take part in the screening programme? Why do some PCTs in England have a rate of eye tests more than 3 times higher than in others? Page 25 Miss Jones estimated from a population based audit that there were a significant number of people who were not referred who would benefit. There were also meanwhile another large number of people seen in hospital clinics who didn’t need to be there. PICTURE Page 26 Miss Jones, the Co-ordinator of the Glaucoma multi professional Network and Service with leadership and resources to: Develop Clinical Networks across primary/secondary, health/public health/social care Localise integrated patient pathways Advise the Clinical commissioning board Advise Health and wellbeing boards on ocular public health Produce the Annual Report of the service PICTURE Page 27 Population based planning and programme budgeting Allocating resources optimally using programme budgeting Use of programme budgeting tools for comparison and to highlight variation NHS Atlas of variation Page 28 City and Hackney has: 23% of those CVI registered blind/visually impaired are due to Glaucoma (Compared to 8% in England and Wales) 13% of those registered are due to Diabetic retinopathy (compared to 7% in E+W) 36% of CVI registration is in the working age population (compared to 17% in EW) Page 29 C &H has a lower spend than national average, cluster and host SHA in comparison PICTURE Page 30 • Overall trend of lower spend on vision in areas of higher deprivation- inverse care law • In comparison to overall total PCT spend as slight increase with increasing deprivation PICTURE Page 31 City and Hackney has less first outpatient attendances compared to the SHA and national average PICTURE Page 32 Outcome measures Vision- total sight tests per 10,000 population PICTURE Page 33 City and Hackney has a higher than average rate of CVI blindness registration due to Glaucoma and DR Right Care Programme Budgeting tools show that compared to similar PCTs it has; Lower overall spend on Vision High index of deprivation Less first outpatient attendances Similar day surgery admission rate Lower spend on GP prescribing for eye care medications Page 34 Shared decision making Creating a culture for patients to actively engage in decision making about their own healthcare Clinicians Diagnosis Cause of disease Prognosis Treatment options Outcome probabilities Patients Experience of illness Social circumstances Attitude to risk Values Preferences Page 35 NHS Direct: Cataract decision making support tool coming soon…….. PICTURE OF WEBSITE PAGE Page 36 1. Population based planning and programme budgeting 2. Sustainable, Accountable Systems 3. Better Value Clinical Practice 4. Shared Decision Making 5. Population Medicine QIPP Right Care Page 37 Conclusions Increasing demands on Eye care services, which is set to continue Significant progress through UK Vision strategy, VISION 2020 and Royal College in new pathways and models Build on current changes with sustainable accountable systems, networks, pathways spread across the country Opportunity for clinicians to take a leading role on planning Eye care services for the 21st century Page 38 “We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them” Albert Einstein